The OSCE Secretariat Bears No Responsibility for the Content of This Document FSC.EMI/235/20 and Circulates It Without Altering Its Content

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

The OSCE Secretariat bears no responsibility for the content of this document FSC.EMI/235/20 and circulates it without altering its content. The distribution by OSCE 23 June 2020 Conference Services of this document is without prejudice to OSCE decisions, as set out in documents agreed by OSCE participating States. ENGLISH only Information Exchange on Conventional Arms Transfers EXPORTS Reporting country: SLOVAKIA Calendar Year: 2019 Date of submission: 18.6.2020 Category (I-VII) Final importer Number State of origin (if Intermediate Description Comments on the State(s) of items not exporter) location (if any) of item transfer I. Battle tanks x x ASCOD tracked vehicle After dynamic Austria 1 equipped with Elbit driving and weapon station 30 mm testing 6 SpZ without weapon For collection Austria system purposes Czech Republic 10 OT-64 without weapon system II. Armoured combat vehicles Czech Republic 10 VPV on BMP-1 without After overhaul weapon system Hungary 1 Self-propelled anti- For collection aircraft double cannon purposes mod53/59 PLdvK Poland 3 BMP-1 United Arab 1 Demining system BOŽENA Emirates 4+ Rwanda 2 122 mm rocket launcher III. Large-calibre 4x4 GRAD-M based on T- artillery systems 815 Saudi Arabia 24 120 mm mortar M12-1535 IV. Combat aircraft x x x x V. Attack helicopters x x x x VI. Warships x x VII. Missiles and a) Czech Republic 285 155 mm missile missile launchers Latvia 3000 155 mm missile M107 Poland 4000 155 mm OFd MKMDV without fuse Serbia 2500 155 mm missile with TNT, without fuse United Arab 50 155 mm HEERFBBT Emirates b) x x Information Exchange on Conventional Arms Transfers IMPORTS Reporting country: SLOVAKIA Calendar Year: 2019 Date of submission: 18.6.2020 Category (I-VII) Exporter State(s) Number State of origin Intermediate Description Comments on the of items (if not exporter) location of item transfer (if any) I. Battle tanks Czech Republic 2 VT-72 Austria 1 ASCOD tracked vehicle For dynamic driving equipped with Elbit weapon and testing station 30 mm Czech Republic 1 Self-propelled anti-aircraft For collection double cannon mod53/59 PLdvK purposes Czech Republic 1 For collection BRDM-2 without weapon system purposes Czech Republic 1 Anti-aircraft double auto For collection II. Armoured combat cannon mod53/59 on chassis purposes vehicles PRAGA V3S Czech Republic 3 BMP-1 For repair Czech Republic 1 4x4 DEMO EVO without weapon system Hungary 1 BMP-1 without weapon system For repair Israel 1 Mine protected armored vehicle AMIR Israel 1 Multi-purpose 4x4 armored vehicle THUNDER III. Large-calibre Bosnia-Herzegovina 15 82 mm mortar M69 artillery systems Czech Republic 1 Self-propelled cannon SD-100 on T-55 Czech Republic 2 122 mm rocket launcher 4x4 GRAD-M based on T-815 IV. Combat aircraft x x x x V. Attack helicopters United States 2 UH-60M BlackHawk x x VI. Warships x x VII. Missiles and a) x x missile launchers b) x x .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Progress in Delivering the British Army's Armoured
AVF0014 Written evidence submitted by Nicholas Drummond “Progress in Delivering the British Army’s Armoured Vehicle Capability.” Nicholas Drummond Defence Industry Consultant and Commentator Aura Consulting Ltd. ______________________________________________________________________________ _________ Contents Section 1 - Introduction Section 2 - HCDC questions 1. Does the Army have a clear understanding of how it will employ its armoured vehicles in future operations? 2. Given the delays to its programmes, will the Army be able to field the Strike Brigades and an armoured division as envisaged by the 2015 SDSR? 3. How much has the Army spent on procuring armoured vehicles over the last 20 years? How many vehicles has it procured with this funding? 4. What other capabilities has the Army sacrificed in order to fund overruns in its core armoured vehicles programmes? 5. How flexible can the Army be in adapting its current armoured vehicle plans to the results of the Integrated Review? 6. By 2025 will the Army be able to match the potential threat posed by peer adversaries? 7. Is the Army still confident that the Warrior CSP can deliver an effective vehicle capability for the foreseeable future? 8. To what extent does poor contractor performance explain the delays to the Warrior and Ajax programmes? 9. Should the UK have a land vehicles industrial strategy, and if so what benefits would this bring? 10. What sovereign capability for the design and production of armoured vehicles does the UK retain? 11. Does it make sense to upgrade the Challenger 2 when newer, more capable vehicles may be available from our NATO allies? 12. What other key gaps are emerging within the Army’s armoured vehicle capability? 13.
[Show full text]
'British Army's Ajax'
DEFENDINGTHE BRITISH EUROPE:EUROPE: “GLARMY’SOBAL BRITBRIT AJAX:AIN”AIN” AND THETHE FUTUREFUTURE OFFIT EUROPEAN FOR GEOPOLITICSPURPOSE? BY JROBERTAMES ROGERS CLARK, DEFENCE FELLOW DEMOCRACY || FFREEDOMREEDOM || HUMANHUMAN RIGHTRIGHTSS ReportReportAugust No No. 2018/. 2018/ 20211 1 Published in 2021 by The Henry Jackson Society The Henry Jackson Society Millbank Tower 21-24 Millbank London SW1P 4QP Registered charity no. 1140489 Tel: +44 (0)20 7340 4520 www.henryjacksonsociety.org © The Henry Jackson Society, 2021. All rights reserved. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author and are not necessarily indicative of those of The Henry Jackson Society or its Trustees. Title: “THE BRITISH ARMY’S AJAX: FIT FOR PURPOSE?” By Robert Clark, Defence Fellow Cover image: Pictured is the new AJAX prototype shown near its future assembly site in Merthyr Tydfil, Wales (http://www.defenceimagery.mod.uk/fotoweb/fwbin/download.dll/45153802.jpg). THE BRITISH ARMY’S AJAX: FIT FOR PURPOSE? BY ROBERT CLARK, DEFENCE FELLOW August 2021 THE BRITISH ARMY’S AJAX: FIT FOR PURPOSE? About the Author Robert Clark completed a BA in International Relations and Arabic (First Class Honours) at Nottingham Trent University and an MA in International Conflict Studies (Distinction) at King’s College London. Robert’s main research interests include emerging technologies within defence, alliance building and the transatlantic partnership, and authoritarian threats to the global order. Robert’s most recent work has been published by the NATO Defence College and Civitas. Robert has submitted evidence for both the Defence and Foreign Affairs Select Committees, and he is a regular contributor for the UK Defence Journal.
[Show full text]
Security & Defence European
a 8.90 D 14974 E D European & Security ES & Defence 4/2020 International Security and Defence Journal COUNTRY FOCUS: FRANCE ISSN 1617-7983 • 105 / 155mm Ammunition www.euro-sd.com • • Pivot to Asia • Future Tactical UAS • CBRN: Protecting the Population • European Transport Helicopters April 2020 • European Submarine Programmes • Malaysia's Distracted Defence Politics · Armed Forces · Procurement · Technology Deep Mourning for Dr Peter Bossdorf It is with great sadness that we have to report the sudden death of our Mana- ging Director and Publishing Director Dr Peter Bossdorf, who passed away on 26 February 2020. Our deepest sympathies go to his wife and his family. Dr Bossdorf joined Report Verlag in 2006, became its Publishing Director in 2007 and later was appointed Managing Direc- tor. In addition, he was Editor-in-Chief of the magazine "Strategie & Technik", which evolved from the traditional "Soldat und Technik" publication. As a result of the merger of Report Verlag with E.S. Mittler & Sohn publishing house, that created Mittler Report Verlag in 2012, the magazi- nes "Strategie & Technik" and "Europäische Sicherheit" were combined under his lea- dership to form the current "Europäische Sicherheit & Technik". At the same time, Dr Bossdorf was appointed Managing Director of Mittler Report Verlag, where he also played a decisive role in the development of the English-language magazine "Europe- an Security & Defence" from a quarterly magazine to an internationally recognised specialist monthly journal. One year ago, Dr Bossdorf also took over the management of K&K Medienverlag-Hardthöhe GmbH as Publisher of the magazine "Hardthöhen- kurier", so that he was most recently the highly valued Managing Director of two publishing houses as well as Editor-in-Chief of "European Security & Defence".
[Show full text]
Security & Defence European
a 7.90 D 14974 E D European & Security ES & Defence 1/2019 International Security and Defence Journal ISSN 1617-7983 • Armoured Vehicles www.euro-sd.com • UK Programmes • Armament Options • • US Army Armoured Systems • Armoured Ambulances • Tyre and Track Technology • Engineer Vehicles January 2019 • Crew Protection • Discreet Armour Politics · Armed Forces · Procurement · Technology The backbone of every strong troop. Mercedes-Benz Defence Vehicles. When your mission is clear. When there’s no road for miles around. And when you need to give all you’ve got, your equipment needs to be the best. At times like these, we’re right by your side. Mercedes-Benz Defence Vehicles: armoured, highly capable off-road and logistics vehicles with payloads ranging from 0.5 to 110 t. Mobilising safety and efficiency: www.mercedes-benz.com/defence-vehicles Editorial ARMOURED VEHICLES FOCUS Improved Protection for Vehicle-Borne Task Forces As always, most of us started the New Year with wishes for peace and happiness. However, in countless continued conflicts large and small, people are being killed, maimed or injured, landscapes and cultural treasures are being destroyed, defaced and damaged, and national assets and resources are being plundered and squandered. In land-based operations to defeat these threats and their accompanying realities, the focus falls on soldiers, security forces and first responders who – often at the risk of their own lives – protect people, enforce justice and guard assets on behalf of their governments. These are dangerous jobs, and there is a clear duty of care upon the employers for the health and well-being of their “human assets”.
[Show full text]
(AVF0016) Written Evidence: HCDC Inquiry Progress in Delivering The
(AVF0016) Written evidence submitted by the Ministry of Defence HCDC Inquiry: Progress in delivering the British Army’s armoured vehicle Executive Summary Armoured Fighting Vehicles (AFVs) are at the heart of the British Army’s contribution to high intensity warfighting and therefore integral to deterrence and a vital part of an integrated defence system. We face a range of threats that includes resurgent and developing powers and violent extremism, and while these threats have diversified AFVs continue to be critical to Defence’s ability to deliver hard power and underpin our credibility in the land environment. The Army’s modernisation programme seeks to ensure that we retain the appropriate capabilities to meet and deter the threat. AFVs deliver persistent offensive fighting power that can directly, or indirectly through deterrence, change the actions of an adversary or enemy, alongside other land and wider defence capabilities, to impose our will. Armour provides credible deterrence and increases tactical options. The objective of the Army’s modernisation programme is to not only create a fleet of highly advanced digitised platforms able to deal with future challenges, but one that will adapt to emerging threats through iterative enhancements and upgrades. Modernised AFVs, networked and integrated into a wider system that includes precision deep fires, air defence, and layered ISR, will transform the way we fight and provide the necessary core for a world-class, credible force. Underpinned by enhanced information sharing through the digital backbone integrated Land and Joint assets will be used more safely, effectively and with greater freedom of action. In the longer term and building on current experimentation plans, upgraded, digitised and networked AFVs will be a critical link to the ‘autonomous’ future of armoured capability through human and machine teaming.
[Show full text]
Obsolescent and Outgunned: the British Army's Armoured Vehicle
House of Commons Defence Committee Obsolescent and outgunned: the British Army’s armoured vehicle capability Fifth Report of Session 2019–21 Report, together with formal minutes relating to the report Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 9 March 2021 HC 659 Published on 14 March 2021 by authority of the House of Commons The Defence Committee The Defence Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Ministry of Defence and its associated public bodies. Current membership Rt Hon Tobias Ellwood MP (Conservative, Bournemouth East) (Chair) Stuart Anderson MP (Conservative, Wolverhampton South West) Sarah Atherton MP (Conservative, Wrexham) Martin Docherty-Hughes MP (Scottish National Party, West Dunbartonshire) Richard Drax MP (Conservative, South Dorset) Rt Hon Mr Mark Francois MP (Conservative, Rayleigh and Wickford) Rt Hon Kevan Jones MP (Labour, North Durham) Mrs Emma Lewell-Buck MP (Labour, South Shields) Gavin Robinson MP (Democratic Unionist Party, Belfast East) Rt Hon John Spellar MP (Labour, Warley) Derek Twigg MP (Labour, Halton) Powers The committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publications © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2021. This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament Licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright-parliament. Committee reports are published on the Committee’s website at committees.parliament.uk/committee/24/defence-committee/ and in print by Order of the House.
[Show full text]
Assembly of Western European Union
ilg- Assembly of Western European Union DOCUMENT 1569 l2May 1991 FORTY-THIRD SESSION European cooperation on armoured vehicles ? REPORT submitted on behalf of the Technological and Aerospace Commrttee by Mr Diaz de Mera, Rapporteur -.\ D,o .J ASSEMBLY OF WESTERN ETIROPEAN LTNION -13. avenue du Prcsrdent-Wilson. '157'75Paris Cedex 16 - Tel. 01.53.67.22.00 Document 1569 12 May 1997 European cooperation on armoured vehicles REPORT' submitted on behalf of the Technological and Aerospace Committeez by Mr Diaz de Mera, Rapporteur TABLE OF CONTENTS DRAFT RECOMMENDATION on European cooperatron on armoured vehrcles EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM submitted by Mr Diaz de Mera, Rapporteur I Introduction II. Armoured vehicle production in WEU member countries (t) Germany (tt) Sparn (nr) France (w) Italy' (v) United Krngdom III. The state of play m European cooperatlon rn this area IV. Conclusions I Adopted unanrmoush'by the Committce. 2 L[embers of the Committee Mr ]vlarshall (Chatman); MM Lenzer, Athnson (Vice-Chairmer),MrsAgutar, Mr Arnau, Mrs Blunck, Mrs Bribosia-Prcard, Mr Cherrrbi, Sir John Cope (Alternate: Sir Dudley Smith), Mr Cunliffe (Alternate: Alexander), Mr Drana, Mrs Durrreu, Mr Feldmann. Mrs Gelderblom-Lankhout, MM Jeambrun, Le Grand. Litherland, L6pez Henares (Alternate'. Diaz de )ulera),Ivfrll Lorenzr, Luis, Martelli, Olivo (Alternate. Lauricella),Nnvl Polydoras. Probst, Ramirez Pery, S/aes, Theis,Yallerx, Mrs Zrssr. Associate members: lvovf Ktratltoglu, Dmqer, Yurur. N B. The names of those taking part m the vote are printed m ttaltcs. DOCL]MENT
[Show full text]
Opportunities for European Collaboration in Armoured Vehicles
Opportunities for European collaboration in armoured vehicles Marta Kepe, Julia Muravska, Richard Flint, Lucia Retter, Antonia Ward, Nathan Ryan For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR2903 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif., and Cambridge, UK R® is a registered trademark. © Copyright 2019 European Defence Agency The present study was ordered by the EDA. The contractor who has undertaken the study remains responsible for its content. RAND Europe is a not-for-profit research organisation that helps to improve policy and decision making through research and analysis. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from the sponsor. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org www.randeurope.org Cover image: NATO North Atlantic Treaty Organization (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0) 1 Project objectives and approach vehicles as well as mine-resistant and ambush-protected armoured vehicles RAND Europe was commissioned by the (MRAPs). European Defence Agency (EDA) in October In order to identify the potential collaboration 2017 to conduct a study on collaborative opportunities, RAND Europe performed a opportunities relating to armoured vehicles high-level overview of supply and demand among participating Member States (pMS) elements related to current and future trends of the EDA and partner countries.1 The in armoured vehicle servicing, research and overarching goal was to support the EDA’s work development (R&D) and procurement (see in identifying new collaboration opportunities Figure 1), while respecting the fact that throughout the full life-cycle of armoured armoured vehicle choice is impacted by such vehicles (excluding main battle tanks – MBTs).
[Show full text]
Security & Defence European
a 8.90 D 14974 E D European & Security ES & Defence 1/2020 International Security and Defence Journal ISSN 1617-7983 • Armoured Vehicles www.euro-sd.com • • Surviving the City Fight • Australia's Armour Renaissance • The Return of the 6x6 AFV • Polish Fleet Modernisation • Light Tactical Mobility Platforms • Turret Options January 2020 • UK AFV Programmes • Vehicle Protection Politics · Armed Forces · Procurement · Technology WHEN SLOW AND STEADY ISN’T AN OPTION. OSHKOSH DEFENSE® JLTV BUILT LIGHT. BUILT RIGHT. Never-before-achieved speed, power and protected mobility to maneuver within combat formations. oshkoshdefense.com ©2020 OSHKOSH DEFENSE, LLC An Oshkosh Corporation Company Oshkosh Defense and the Oshkosh Defense logo are registered trademarks of Oshkosh Defense, LLC, Oshkosh, WI, USA JLTV_P2C-1_2019-EU-1 OSHK_2020_JLTV_Phs2C_EuroSecDfnc_FullPg.indd 1 12/5/19 11:48 AM Editorial My New Armoured Vehicle is a Camel A camel, remarked the British designer Alec Issigonis, is a horse designed by committee. Given that the requirements of modern armoured vehicles are driven by so many conflict- ing factors, perhaps they are the defence establishment’s own camels. Mobility, protection and firepower as core requirements are by no means confined to Main Battle Tanks, but the emergence of uninformed, or “claimed” national industrial strategic capabilities; the tightening of budgets; the growth of “zero-casualty” politics; and the ability to destroy an enemy at drone’s length all impact global demand for vehicles with the full suite of capa- bilities now available. That “full suite” costs space and manoeuvrability, as crews of 4x4 vehicles in combat have, historically, sometimes found to their detriment.
[Show full text]
Global Armoured Vehicle Holdings
Global Armoured Vehicle Holdings Revealing the total number and type of armoured vehicles in service worldwide and future procurement plans for each country Contents Page 1 Summary Page 4 Annex A: Regional Distribution of Main Battle Tanks Annex B: Regional Distribution of Light Armoured Vehicles Page 5 Europe Page 10 Asia-Pacific Page 14 Middle East and North Africa Page 18 Africa Page 22 Latin America Page 25 North America Page 27 Russia and CIS Page 29 International Armoured Vehicles XV SOURCES: STEVE PHILPOTT, MILTECH 2014 WORLD DEFENCE ALMANAC, JANES LAND WARFARE – ARMOURED VEHICLES 2014 The market for armoured globe (see annex B). Nearly Although Latin America vehicles continues to be a third of these are only has 7,735 light buoyant, with the Asia- operated by Russia and the armoured vehicles (3.3%), Pacific region predicted to CIS countries (28.7%), with several vehicles are be the major growth area Russia alone accounting for successfully produced in over the next 10 years. 25% of the world total. the region and Brazil is the Afghanistan, Australia, Europe operates 18.2% largest market, with China, India, Malaysia, New of the total (42,401) and 25 procurement programmes Zealand, Pakistan, the European countries have also in Argentina, Jamaica, Philippines, Singapore, procurement programmes Paraguay (planned) and South Korea, Taiwan and under way or planned, with Venezuela. Thailand all have major many new vehicles on the Around 11,000 light armoured vehicle market from European tracked vehicles are procurement programmes manufacturing companies. forecast to be produced under way or planned. The Middle-East over the next decade, Despite large budget cuts, accounts for over 15.1% of valued at over $30 billion, the US still plans to devote the world fleet (35,270), whereas nearly 27,000 light significant funds to its with active procurement wheeled vehicles, valued at AMPV, JLTV and ACV programmes in Algeria, over $12 billion are also programmes.
[Show full text]
Armoured Vehicles Global Inventories 2016-17 Introduction
ARMOURED VEHICLES GLOBAL INVENTORIES 2016-17 INTRODUCTION As detailed in Defence IQ’s 6th annual Global Armoured Vehicles Market Report (2017), the armoured vehicles market is projected to reach $15.17 billion in 2017. According to the report’s proprietary survey data, confidence in the global armoured vehicle market has rebounded after a temporary downturn, underpinned by steadily rising defence budgets, new contract opportunities and recent big ticket government investments. In addition to survey data and analysis the report also uncovered a continued demand for landmine/IED protection worldwide and growing demand for Armoured Personnel Carriers (APCs) and Light Protected Vehicles. Among the global community, there are also seen increasing dangers of directed energy and other types of anti-vehicles systems that demand innovative and cost-effective solutions as soon as possible. Meanwhile, Saudi Arabia and the UAE have risen in the past year as the world’s focal countries for armoured vehicles business. This follow-on report details global vehicle inventories – in easy-to-read table format – in so far as it is possible to calculate. Of course, some nations and regions are less transparent than others about the exact units stocked in their military vehicle fleets, but we hope the information enclosed can help readers garner a greater understanding of the current situation for end-users. This report has been issued ahead of the 17th Annual International Armoured Vehicles conference, taking place in London, UK, on 23-26 January. A registration form can be found at www.internationalarmouredvehicles.com. Need more information? Contact us: +44 (0) 20 7036 1300 Email:[email protected] Credit: nimr.ae 2 MARKET SUMMARY The market for armoured vehicles continues to be buoyant, with the Asia-Pacific region predicted to be the major growth area over the next 10 years.
[Show full text]
The Rise of Ecotourism in Botswana
The Eurasia Center/EBC Brief International Security Program The Great British Tank Debate March 2021 The Future of British Armor RBSL-Challenger-2-LEP_01 Photo Credit: European Defense Review Online Ethan Yang The Eurasia Center www.EurasiaCenter.org The Eurasian Business Coalition (EBC) 2200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Suite 400E Washington, DC 20037 www.USEBC.org Challenger 130mm Last August, reports emerged that the British Army was planning to scrap its ageing fleets of Challenger 2 main battle tanks and Warrior infantry fighting vehicles in advance of the upcoming Integrated Security and Defense Review. Immediately, these reports set off a firestorm of debate within the British defense and security community. Senior military leaders, including Defense Secretary Ben Wallace and General Sir Mark Carlton Smith, the Chief of the General Staff, pitched the plan as part of a wider shift away from traditional ‘sunset capabilities’ in favor of newer ‘sunrise capabilities’ such as cyber and electronic warfare capabilities and unmanned weapon systems. They argued that the threat posed by conventional forces was diminishing in modern warfare and that the British Armed Forces should instead focus on countering irregular and hybrid threats as well as operations in the emerging space and cyber domains.1 Other proponents of the plan, such as renowned military historian Sir Max Hastings, pointed to the increasing vulnerability of heavy armored vehicles to drones, attack helicopters and anti-tank guided missiles as proof of their obsolescence on the modern
[Show full text]