DOCSLIB.ORG

An Ecological Study of a Constructed Treatment Wetland on a Commercial Crocodile Farm Next to the Okavango Delta, Botswana

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
An Ecological Study of a Constructed Treatment Wetland on a Commercial Crocodile Farm Next to the Okavango Delta, Botswana AN ECOLOGICAL STUDY OF A CONSTRUCTED TREATMENT WETLAND ON A COMMERCIAL CROCODILE FARM NEXT TO THE OKAVANGO DELTA, BOTSWANA By JC LE ROUX Dissertation submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Magister Scientiae in the Department of Zoology and Entomology Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences University of the Free State 10 February 2020 SUPERVISOR: Prof LL Van As CO-SUPERVISOR: Dr C Jansen van Rensburg Decleration I, Tiaan le Roux, declare that the Master’s Degree research thesis that I hereby submit for the Master’s Degree qualification in Zoology at the University of the Free State is my independent work and that I have not previously submitted for a qualification at another institution of higher education. I, Tiaan le Roux, declare that I am aware that the copyright is vested in the University of the Free State. I, Tiaan le Roux, hereby declare that all royalties as regards to intellectual property that was developed during this course of and/or in connection with this study will accrue to the University of the Free State. Tiaan le Roux 10 February 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................... i ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................. ii OPSOMMING ............................................................................................................ iv CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION .................................................................................. 1 CHAPTER 2: WETLANDS AND CONSTRUCTED TREATMENT WETLANDS (CTWs) ................................................................................................................................... 4 2.1: The history of CTWs ........................................................................................ 5 2.2: Components of CTWs ..................................................................................... 6 2.3: Wetland hydrology ........................................................................................... 6 2.4: Wetland substrates .......................................................................................... 7 2.5: Types of CTWs ................................................................................................ 8 2.5.1: Surface flow (SF) wetland ......................................................................... 8 2.5.2: Horizontal subsurface flow (HSSF) wetland .............................................. 9 2.5.3: Vertical subsurface flow (VSSF) wetland ................................................ 11 2.5.4: Hybrid systems ........................................................................................ 12 2.6: Functions and values of CTWs ...................................................................... 12 2.7: CTWs as a habitat ......................................................................................... 14 2.8: Microbial populations in CTWs ...................................................................... 14 2.9: Zooplankton in CTWs .................................................................................... 15 2.10: Wetland vegetation ...................................................................................... 15 2.11: Processes at work in CTWs ......................................................................... 16 2.12: How CTWs improve water quality ................................................................ 18 2.13: Seasonal operation of CTWs ....................................................................... 18 2.14: CTW limitations ............................................................................................ 20 CHAPTER 3: MATERIAL AND METHODS .............................................................. 21 3.1: Study area and field laboratory ...................................................................... 21 3.2: Water supply .................................................................................................. 26 3.3: Collection and identification of plankton material and other organisms ......... 26 3.4: Preparing specimens for the Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) .............. 28 3.5: Water quality measurements ......................................................................... 29 3.6: Statistical analysis ......................................................................................... 29 CHAPTER 4: RESULTS OF KROKOVANGO CTW – TAXA COLLECTED AND WATER QUALITY .................................................................................................... 30 4.1: Phytoplankton ................................................................................................ 30 4.1.1: Phylum: Chlorophyta ............................................................................... 30 4.1.2: Phylum: Euglenophyta ............................................................................ 39 4.1.3: Phylum: Bacillariophyta ........................................................................... 42 4.1.4: Phylum: Cyanophyta ............................................................................... 48 4.2: Phytoplankton abundance .......................................................................... 53 4.2: Protozoa ........................................................................................................ 54 4.2.1: Phylum: Amoebozoa ............................................................................... 55 4.2.2: Phylum: Ciliophora .................................................................................. 57 4.3: Rotifera .......................................................................................................... 65 4.3.1: Class: Monogononta ............................................................................... 66 Order: Ploima Hudson and Gosse, 1886 ....................................................... 66 Family: Asplanchnidae Eckstein, 1883 ...................................................... 67 Family: Brachionidae Ehrenberg, 1838 ...................................................... 67 Family: Lecanidae Bartos, 1959 ................................................................. 71 Family Lepadellidae Harring, 1913 ............................................................ 73 4.3.2: Class: Digononta ..................................................................................... 75 Order: Bdelloidea Hudson, 1884 ................................................................... 76 Family Philodinidae Ehrenberg, 1838 ........................................................ 76 4.4: Cladocera ...................................................................................................... 79 4.4.1: Family Chydoridae Dybowski & Grochowski, 1894 .......................... 80 4.4.2: Family Daphniidae Strauss, 1820 .................................................... 80 4.4.3: Family Macrothricidae Norman & Brady, 1867 ................................. 85 4.5: Copepoda ...................................................................................................... 88 4.5.1: Order: Cyclopoida Burmeister, 1835 ................................................... 88 Family Cyclopidae Rafinesque, 1815 ......................................................... 89 4.6: Birds, plants and insects recorded from the Krokovango CTW ..................... 92 4.7: Results on zooplankton abundance ............................................................... 94 4.8: Physical water quality .................................................................................... 97 CHAPTER 5: DISCUSSION ..................................................................................... 98 5.1: CTWs and the Krokovango CTW ................................................................... 98 5.2: The importance of phytoplankton and microinvertebrates found in the Krokovango CTW ............................................................................................... 103 5.2.1: Phytoplankton of the Krokovango CTW ................................................ 103 5.2.2: Protozoa of the Krokovango CTW ......................................................... 106 5.2.3: Rotifera of the Krokovango CTW .......................................................... 108 5.2.4: Cladocera of the Krokovango CTW ....................................................... 111 5.2.5: Copepoda of the Krokovango CTW ...................................................... 112 5.3: Comparable studies on zooplankton composition and abundance .............. 114 5.4: Water quality of the Krokovango CTW and the Okavango Delta ................. 117 Concluding remarks ............................................................................................ 120 CHAPTER 6: REFERENCES ................................................................................. 121 APPENDIX 1: ZOOPLANKTON SPECIES COUNTS AND ABUNDANCE 2017 .... 166 APPENDIX 2: ZOOPLANKTON SPECIES COUNTS AND ABUNDANCE 2017 .... 167 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express my sincere appreciation to the following individuals and institutions for their contributions towards this study: My initial supervisor, Prof Jo Van As, for giving me the inspiration and opportunity to conduct this study and lending his guidance and knowledge throughout the time I was honored enough to get to know him. My current supervisor, Prof LL Van As, for her continuous support, guidance, assistance,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 106Th Annual Meeting of the German Zoological Society Abstracts
    September 13–16, 2013 106th Annual Meeting of the German Zoological Society Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München Geschwister-Scholl-Platz 1, 80539 Munich, Germany Abstracts ISBN 978-3-00-043583-6 1 munich Information Content Local Organizers: Abstracts Prof. Dr. Benedikt Grothe, LMU Munich Satellite Symposium I – Neuroethology .......................................... 4 Prof. Dr. Oliver Behrend, MCN-LMU Munich Satellite Symposium II – Perspectives in Animal Physiology .... 33 Satellite Symposium III – 3D EM .......................................................... 59 Conference Office Behavioral Biology ................................................................................... 83 event lab. GmbH Dufourstraße 15 Developmental Biology ......................................................................... 135 D-04107 Leipzig Ecology ......................................................................................................... 148 Germany Evolutionary Biology ............................................................................... 174 www.eventlab.org Morphology................................................................................................ 223 Neurobiology ............................................................................................. 272 Physiology ................................................................................................... 376 ISBN 978-3-00-043583-6 Zoological Systematics ........................................................................... 416
    [Show full text]
  • Reversibility of Inducible Defenses in Daphnia
    REVERSIBILITY OF INDUCIBLE DEFENSES IN DAPHNIA Q UIRIN H ERZOG DISSERTATION DER FAKULTÄT FÜR BIOLOGIE DER LUDWIG-MAXIMILIANS-UNIVERSITÄT MÜNCHEN VORGELEGT VON QUIRIN HERZOG AM 1. JUNI 2016 1. Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Chris an Laforsch 2. Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Herwig S bor Eingereicht: 1. Juni 2016 Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 12. Dezember 2016 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Zusammenfassung 3 Summary 5 Chapter 1 – Introduc on 7 Chapter 2 – Ar cle: “Modality ma ers for the expression of inducible 15 defenses: Introducing a concept of predator modality”, Herzog, Q., and C. Laforsch. 2013, BMC Biology, (11) 113 Chapter 3 – Ar cle: “Inducible Defenses with a “Twist“: Daphnia barbata 27 Abandons Bilateral Symmetry in Response to an Ancient Predator”, Herzog, Q., Rabus, M., Wolfschoon Ribeiro, B. and C. Laforsch. 2016, PLOS one, 11 (2) Chapter 4 – Ar cle: “Predator specifi c reversibility of morphological 34 defenses in Daphnia barbata”, Herzog, Q., Ti gen, C. and C. Laforsch. 2016, Journal of Plankton Research, 38 (4) Chapter 5 – Ar cle: “Plas city of defensive traits in adult Daphnia 45 magna in response to Triops cancriformis”, Herzog, Q., Rabus, M. and C. Laforsch. Manuscipt to be submi ed to Journal of Plankton Research Chapter 6 – Ar cle: “Eff ects of inducible defenses in Daphnia magna on 60 sinking and swimming effi ciency“, Herzog, Q., Immler, R., Sternhardt, M. and C. Laforsch. Manuscipt to be submi ed to Journal of Plankton Research Chapter 7 – Discussion 79 References 86 Author Contribu ons 98 Acknowledgements 99 Curriculum Vitae 101 Statutory Declara on and Statement 102 2 ZUSAMMENFASSUNG Nahezu jeder Organismus ist im engeren oder weiteren Sinne Präda on ausgesetzt, sei es durch Prädatoren sensu strictu, Weidegänger, Parasiten oder Parasitoiden.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution and Comparative Morphology of the Euglenophyte
    EVOLUTION AND COMPARATIVE MORPHOLOGY OF THE EUGLENOPHYTE PLASTID by PATRICK JERRY PAUL BROWN (Under the Direction of Mark A. Farmer) ABSTRACT My doctoral research centered on understanding the evolution of the euglenophyte protists, with special attention paid to their plastids. The euglenophytes are a widely distributed group of euglenid protists that have acquired a chloroplast via secondary symbiogenesis. The goals of my research were to 1) test the efficacy of plastid morphological and ultrastructural characters in phylogenetic analysis; 2) understand the process of plastid development and partitioning in the euglenophytes; 3) to use a plastid- encoded protein gene to determine a euglenophyte phylogeny; and 4) to perform a multi- gene analysis to uncover clues about the origins of the euglenophyte plastid. My work began with an alpha-taxonomic study that redefined the rare euglenophyte Euglena rustica. This work not only validly circumscribed the species, but also noted novel features of its habitat, cyclic migration habits, and cellular biology. This was followed by a study of plastid morphology and development in a number of diverse euglenophytes. The results of this study showed that the plastids of euglenophytes undergo drastic changes in morphology and ultrastructure over the course of a single cell division cycle. I concluded that there are four main classes of plastid development and partitioning in the euglenophytes, and that the class a given species will use is dependant on its interphase plastid morphology and the rigidity of the cell. The discovery of the class IV partitioning strategy in which cells with only one or very few plastids fragment their plastids prior to cell division was very significant.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison Regarding the Physico- Chemical Variables and Zooplankton Community Characteristics of Two Ethiopian Rift Valley Lakes: Lake Chamo and Lake Abaya
    FACULTY OF SCIENCE A comparison regarding the physico- chemical variables and zooplankton community characteristics of two Ethiopian Rift Valley Lakes: Lake Chamo and Lake Abaya Arne DERIEMAECKER Supervisor: Prof. L. De Meester Thesis presented in fulfillment of the requirements Co-supervisor: P. Lemmens for the degree of Master of Science Mentor: F. Eshetu Teferra in Biology Academic year 2012-2013 © Copyright by KU Leuven Without written permission of the promotors and the authors it is forbidden to reproduce or adapt in any form or by any means any part of this publication. Requests for obtaining the right to reproduce or utilize parts of this publication should be addressed to KU Leuven, Faculteit Wetenschappen, Geel Huis, Kasteelpark Arenberg 11 bus 2100, 3001 Leuven (Heverlee), Telephone +32 16 32 14 01. A written permission of the promotor is also required to use the methods, products, schematics and programs described in this work for industrial or commercial use, and for submitting this publication in scientific contests. I Acknowledgements I am in large debt of gratitude to Fassil Eshetu Teferra as he let me participate in his doctorate study. In all sorts of circumstances, he remained calm and kind, and when I had questions, he was always there to answer them. In addition, he and his family were very hospitable and they taught me a lot about Ethiopian culture. The second person I want to express my appreciation for is my supervisor Pieter Lemmens. His experience was a great help during the sampling campaign and he was very patient with me. I am also very grateful to the people of Arba Minch who helped us during our sampling campaign, without their help the campaign would have been less fun and we might not have finished it before the start of the rain season (Tariku Anjamo, Communist Asemamawe, Selamnesh Tesfaye and Sebla).
    [Show full text]
  • Subunit Rrna Genes of the Genus Euglena Ehrenberg
    International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology (2001), 51, 773–781 Printed in Great Britain Phylogenetic analysis of chloroplast small- subunit rRNA genes of the genus Euglena Ehrenberg Department of Plant Rafał Milanowski, Boz0 ena Zakrys! and Jan Kwiatowski Systematics and Geography, Warsaw University, Al. Ujazdowskie 4, PL-00-478 ! Warszawa, Poland Author for correspondence: Boz0 ena Zakrys. Tel: j48 22 628 2595. Fax: j48 22 622 6646. e-mail: zakrys!mercury.ci.uw.edu.pl Almost complete sequences of plastid SSU rDNA (16S rDNA) from 17 species ! belonging to the order Euglenales (sensu Nemeth, 1997; Shi et al., 1999) were determined and used to infer phylogenetic relationships between 10 species of Euglena, three of Phacus, and one of each of Colacium, Lepocinclis, Strombomonas, Trachelomonas and Eutreptia. The maximum-parsimony (MP), maximum-likelihood (ML) and distance analyses of the unambiguously aligned sequence fragments imply that the genus Euglena is not monophyletic. Parsimony and distance methods divide Euglenaceae into two sister groups. One comprises of representatives from the subgenera Phacus, Lepocinclis and ! Discoglena (sensu Zakrys, 1986), whereas the other includes members of ! Euglena and Calliglena subgenera (sensu Zakrys, 1986), intermixed with representatives of Colacium, Strombomonas and Trachelomonas. In all analyses subgenera Euglena – together with Euglena polymorpha (representative of the subgenus Calliglena) – and Discoglena – together with Phacus and Lepocinclis – form two well-defined clades. The data clearly indicate that a substantial revision of euglenoid systematics is very much required, nevertheless it must await while more information can be gathered, allowing resolution of outstanding relationships. Keywords: chloroplast SSU rDNA, Euglena, Calliglena, Discoglena, molecular phylogeny INTRODUCTION The genus Euglena consists of organisms highly diversified with respect to cell architecture.
    [Show full text]
  • {Download PDF} Freshwater Life
    FRESHWATER LIFE PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Malcolm Greenhalgh,Denys Ovenden | 256 pages | 30 Mar 2007 | HarperCollins Publishers | 9780007177776 | English | London, United Kingdom Freshwater Life PDF Book Classes of organisms found in marine ecosystems include brown algae , dinoflagellates , corals , cephalopods , echinoderms , and sharks. Gastrotrichs phylum: Gastrotricha are small and flat worms very hairy whose body ends with two quite large appendixes. In fact, many of them are equipped with one or two or even more flagella. But this was no typical love story. Figure 9 - Pediastrum sp. Once it leaves the freshwater, it does not eat, and so after it spawns its energy reserves are used up and it dies. You can see that life on Earth survives on what is essentially only a "drop in the bucket" of Earth's total water supply! Anisonema Figure 7 is an alga lacking in chloroplasts which feeds on organic detritus. Figure 13 - Spirogyrae in conjugation. Download as PDF Printable version. The simple study of animal behaviour whilst sitting on the edge of a pond is also useful. Adult freshwater snails are capable of exploits which are difficult to imagine. They are also known as Cyanophyceae because of their blue- green colour. Wetlands can be part of the lentic system, as they form naturally along most lake shores, the width of the wetland and littoral zone being dependent upon the slope of the shoreline and the amount of natural change in water levels, within and among years. Survey Manual. This region is called the thermocline. Cite this article Pick a style below, and copy the text for your bibliography.
    [Show full text]
  • "Phycology". In: Encyclopedia of Life Science
    Phycology Introductory article Ralph A Lewin, University of California, La Jolla, California, USA Article Contents Michael A Borowitzka, Murdoch University, Perth, Australia . General Features . Uses The study of algae is generally called ‘phycology’, from the Greek word phykos meaning . Noxious Algae ‘seaweed’. Just what algae are is difficult to define, because they belong to many different . Classification and unrelated classes including both prokaryotic and eukaryotic representatives. Broadly . Evolution speaking, the algae comprise all, mainly aquatic, plants that can use light energy to fix carbon from atmospheric CO2 and evolve oxygen, but which are not specialized land doi: 10.1038/npg.els.0004234 plants like mosses, ferns, coniferous trees and flowering plants. This is a negative definition, but it serves its purpose. General Features Algae range in size from microscopic unicells less than 1 mm several species are also of economic importance. Some in diameter to kelps as long as 60 m. They can be found in kinds are consumed as food by humans. These include almost all aqueous or moist habitats; in marine and fresh- the red alga Porphyra (also known as nori or laver), an water environments they are the main photosynthetic or- important ingredient of Japanese foods such as sushi. ganisms. They are also common in soils, salt lakes and hot Other algae commonly eaten in the Orient are the brown springs, and some can grow in snow and on rocks and the algae Laminaria and Undaria and the green algae Caulerpa bark of trees. Most algae normally require light, but some and Monostroma. The new science of molecular biology species can also grow in the dark if a suitable organic carbon has depended largely on the use of algal polysaccharides, source is available for nutrition.
    [Show full text]
  • Micractinium Tetrahymenae (Trebouxiophyceae, Chlorophyta), a New Endosymbiont Isolated from Ciliates
    diversity Article Micractinium tetrahymenae (Trebouxiophyceae, Chlorophyta), a New Endosymbiont Isolated from Ciliates Thomas Pröschold 1,*, Gianna Pitsch 2 and Tatyana Darienko 3 1 Research Department for Limnology, Leopold-Franzens-University of Innsbruck, Mondsee, A-5310 Mondsee, Austria 2 Limnological Station, Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Zürich, CH-8802 Kilchberg, Switzerland; [email protected] 3 Albrecht-von-Haller-Institute of Plant Sciences, Experimental Phycology and Culture Collection of Algae, Georg-August-University of Göttingen, D-37073 Göttingen, Germany; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 28 April 2020; Accepted: 13 May 2020; Published: 15 May 2020 Abstract: Endosymbiosis between coccoid green algae and ciliates are widely distributed and occur in various phylogenetic lineages among the Ciliophora. Most mixotrophic ciliates live in symbiosis with different species and genera of the so-called Chlorella clade (Trebouxiophyceae). The mixotrophic ciliates can be differentiated into two groups: (i) obligate, which always live in symbiosis with such green algae and are rarely algae-free and (ii) facultative, which formed under certain circumstances such as in anoxic environments an association with algae. A case of the facultative endosymbiosis is found in the recently described species of Tetrahymena, T. utriculariae, which lives in the bladder traps of the carnivorous aquatic plant Utricularia reflexa. The green endosymbiont of this ciliate belonged to the genus Micractinium. We characterized the isolated algal strain using an integrative approach and compared it to all described species of this genus. The phylogenetic analyses using complex evolutionary secondary structure-based models revealed that this endosymbiont represents a new species of Micractinium, M.
    [Show full text]
  • Euglenophytes Reported from Karst Sink-Holes in the Malopolska Upland (Poland, Central Europe)
    Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim. 39 (4), 333 - 346 Euglenophytes reported from karst sink-holes in the Malopolska Upland (Poland, Central Europe) K. Wolowski Polish Academy of Sciences, W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Department of Phycology, ul. Lubicz 46, PL 31-512 Kraków, Poland. E-mail: [email protected] In karst sink-holes within the environs of Czajków, and in an old fishpond within the Skorocice gypsum valley, 24 taxa of eu- glenophytes, comprising Euglena (10), Phacus (9), Lepocinclis (2), and Trachelomonas (3) were found. Four of them, Phacus elegans Pochmann, Ph. arnoldii Swirenko var. ovatus Popova, Ph. plicatus Conrad, and Ph. curvicauda Swir. var. robusta Al- lorge & Lefèvre, are new for the Polish flora, and rarely reported worldwide. Keywords : Euglenophyta, Central Europe, Poland, Malopolska Upland, karst sink-holes, fishponds. Introduction Material and methods The investigated area lies in the eastern part of the One collection of material was made from each lo- Nida Basin, a wide depression within the ´Swietokrzys-, cation during summer (June 1986). Unfiltered water kie Mountains and Cracow-Czestochowa, Upland. The (containing plankton) along with the bottom of two origin of the karst sink-holes in this area is connected sink-holes at Czajków and two fishponds at Skorocice to the occurrence of varying ground water levels. The were sampled. The water temperature in the sink-holes highest level lies just below the surface of Quaternary at Czajków was 17°C and the pH value was 5.4 (area formation and the lowest is situated in the Tertiary ca. = 0.80 ha, depth = 40 cm).
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Background of the Trust
    TRANSYLVANIAN REVIEW OF SYSTEMATICAL AND ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH 17.2 The Wetlands Diversity Editors Angela Curtean-Bănăduc & Doru Bănăduc Sibiu ‒ Romania 2015 TRANSYLVANIAN REVIEW OF SYSTEMATICAL AND ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH 17.2 The Wetlands Diversity Editors Angela Curtean-Bănăduc & Doru Bănăduc “Lucian Blaga” University of Sibiu, Faculty of Sciences, Department of Ecology and Environment Protection Published based mainly on some of the scientific materials presented at the fourth “Aquatic Biodiversity International Conference” ‒ Sibiu/Romania 2015 ESENIAS Ecotur Sibiu “Lucian Blaga” International East and South N.G.O. University Association for Danube European network for of Sibiu Research Invasive Alien Species Sibiu ‒ Romania 2015 Scientifical Reviewers John Robert AKEROYD Sherkin Island Marine Station, Sherkin Island ‒ Ireland. Doru BĂNĂDUC “Lucian Blaga” University of Sibiu, Sibiu ‒ Romania. Alexandru BURCEA “Lucian Blaga” University of Sibiu, Sibiu ‒ Romania. Bill CHAMBERS Liverpool Hope University, Liverpool ‒ United Kingdom. Kevin CIANFAGLIONE University of Camerino, Camerino ‒ Italy. Angela CURTEAN-BĂNĂDUC “Lucian Blaga” University of Sibiu, Sibiu ‒ Romania. Laurisse FRAMPTON Australian Rivers Institute, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland ‒ Australia. Andréa GALOTTI CEACTierra – University of Jaén, Jaén ‒ Spain. Marian-Traian GOMOIU Romanian Academy, Bucharest ‒ Romania. Thomas HEIN Austrian Academy of Sciences, Institute for Limnology, Mondsee ‒ Austria. Georg Albert JANAUER University of Vienna, Vienna ‒ Austria. Mike JOY Te Kura Matauranga o nga Taonga a Papatuanuku Massey University, Palmerston North ‒ New Zealand. Mirjana LENHARDT Institute for Biological Research, Belgrade ‒ Serbia. Weronika MAŚLANKO University of Life Science of Lublin, Lublin – Poland. Skyler PAULI Montana University, Missula ‒ United States of America. Eckbert SCHNEIDER Karlsruhe University, Institute for Waters and River Basin Management, Rastatt ‒ Germay. Teodora TRICHKOVA Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Zoology, Sofia ‒ Bulgaria.
    [Show full text]
  • Chloroplast Phylogenomic Analysis of Chlorophyte Green Algae Identifies a Novel Lineage Sister to the Sphaeropleales (Chlorophyceae) Claude Lemieux*, Antony T
    Lemieux et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology (2015) 15:264 DOI 10.1186/s12862-015-0544-5 RESEARCHARTICLE Open Access Chloroplast phylogenomic analysis of chlorophyte green algae identifies a novel lineage sister to the Sphaeropleales (Chlorophyceae) Claude Lemieux*, Antony T. Vincent, Aurélie Labarre, Christian Otis and Monique Turmel Abstract Background: The class Chlorophyceae (Chlorophyta) includes morphologically and ecologically diverse green algae. Most of the documented species belong to the clade formed by the Chlamydomonadales (also called Volvocales) and Sphaeropleales. Although studies based on the nuclear 18S rRNA gene or a few combined genes have shed light on the diversity and phylogenetic structure of the Chlamydomonadales, the positions of many of the monophyletic groups identified remain uncertain. Here, we used a chloroplast phylogenomic approach to delineate the relationships among these lineages. Results: To generate the analyzed amino acid and nucleotide data sets, we sequenced the chloroplast DNAs (cpDNAs) of 24 chlorophycean taxa; these included representatives from 16 of the 21 primary clades previously recognized in the Chlamydomonadales, two taxa from a coccoid lineage (Jenufa) that was suspected to be sister to the Golenkiniaceae, and two sphaeroplealeans. Using Bayesian and/or maximum likelihood inference methods, we analyzed an amino acid data set that was assembled from 69 cpDNA-encoded proteins of 73 core chlorophyte (including 33 chlorophyceans), as well as two nucleotide data sets that were generated from the 69 genes coding for these proteins and 29 RNA-coding genes. The protein and gene phylogenies were congruent and robustly resolved the branching order of most of the investigated lineages. Within the Chlamydomonadales, 22 taxa formed an assemblage of five major clades/lineages.
    [Show full text]
  • Freshwater Algae in Britain and Ireland - Bibliography
    Freshwater algae in Britain and Ireland - Bibliography Floras, monographs, articles with records and environmental information, together with papers dealing with taxonomic/nomenclatural changes since 2003 (previous update of ‘Coded List’) as well as those helpful for identification purposes. Theses are listed only where available online and include unpublished information. Useful websites are listed at the end of the bibliography. Further links to relevant information (catalogues, websites, photocatalogues) can be found on the site managed by the British Phycological Society (http://www.brphycsoc.org/links.lasso). Abbas A, Godward MBE (1964) Cytology in relation to taxonomy in Chaetophorales. Journal of the Linnean Society, Botany 58: 499–597. Abbott J, Emsley F, Hick T, Stubbins J, Turner WB, West W (1886) Contributions to a fauna and flora of West Yorkshire: algae (exclusive of Diatomaceae). Transactions of the Leeds Naturalists' Club and Scientific Association 1: 69–78, pl.1. Acton E (1909) Coccomyxa subellipsoidea, a new member of the Palmellaceae. Annals of Botany 23: 537–573. Acton E (1916a) On the structure and origin of Cladophora-balls. New Phytologist 15: 1–10. Acton E (1916b) On a new penetrating alga. New Phytologist 15: 97–102. Acton E (1916c) Studies on the nuclear division in desmids. 1. Hyalotheca dissiliens (Smith) Bréb. Annals of Botany 30: 379–382. Adams J (1908) A synopsis of Irish algae, freshwater and marine. Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy 27B: 11–60. Ahmadjian V (1967) A guide to the algae occurring as lichen symbionts: isolation, culture, cultural physiology and identification. Phycologia 6: 127–166 Allanson BR (1973) The fine structure of the periphyton of Chara sp.
    [Show full text]