DOCSLIB.ORG

Factors Affecting Phytoplankton Biodiversity and Toxin Production Tracey Magrann Loma Linda University

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Factors Affecting Phytoplankton Biodiversity and Toxin Production Tracey Magrann Loma Linda University Loma Linda University TheScholarsRepository@LLU: Digital Archive of Research, Scholarship & Creative Works Loma Linda University Electronic Theses, Dissertations & Projects 6-1-2011 Factors Affecting Phytoplankton Biodiversity and Toxin Production Tracey Magrann Loma Linda University Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarsrepository.llu.edu/etd Part of the Biology Commons Recommended Citation Magrann, Tracey, "Factors Affecting Phytoplankton Biodiversity and Toxin Production" (2011). Loma Linda University Electronic Theses, Dissertations & Projects. 45. http://scholarsrepository.llu.edu/etd/45 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by TheScholarsRepository@LLU: Digital Archive of Research, Scholarship & Creative Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Loma Linda University Electronic Theses, Dissertations & Projects by an authorized administrator of TheScholarsRepository@LLU: Digital Archive of Research, Scholarship & Creative Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY School of Science and Technology in conjunction with the Faculty of Graduate Studies ____________________ Factors Affecting Phytoplankton Biodiversity and Toxin Production by Tracey Magrann ____________________ A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Biology ____________________ June 2011 © 2011 Tracey Magrann All Rights Reserved Each person whose signature appears below certifies that this dissertation in his opinion is adequate, in scope and quality, as a dissertation for the degree Doctor of Philosophy. , Chairperson Stephen G. Dunbar, Associate Professor of Biology Danilo S. Boskovic, Assistant Professor of Biochemistry, School of Medicine H. Paul Buchheim, Professor of Geology William K. Hayes, Professor of Biology Kevin E. Nick, Associate Professor of Geology iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express my deepest gratitude to Dr. Stephen G. Dunbar, who assisted with the majority of the editing and for his wonderful guidance throughout this research project, Dr. Danilo Boskovic for providing space in his laboratory, constructing data sheets, giving careful directions in proper water chemistry analysis techniques, and editing proficiency, Dr. Bill Hayes for his contribution in the statistics portion of this work, Dr. Martha Sutula for site selection and providing laboratory and field equipment, Dr. H. Paul Buchheim for contributing expertise in limnology, and Dr. Kevin Nick for his insightful editing contributions. I am also very thankful to those who provided grants and other funding which allowed this project to expand throughout five counties. The Southern California Coastal Waters Research Project (SCCWRP) funded the water chemistry analysis, and the toxin analysis was funded by grants from Marine Research Group (MRG) of Loma Linda University, the Southern California Academy of Sciences, Newport Bay Naturalists and Friends, El Dorado Audubon Society, Friends of Madrona Marsh, Sea and Sage Audubon Society, Blue Water Technologies, and Preserve Calavera. To my family and friends, your love and support through this long endeavor has been treasured and I could not have finished without you. I would like to give special thanks to my husband for his patience and cheerfulness over the past few years. And finally, I would like to thank God for providing me the undeserved opportunity to study His creation and marvel in its complexity. iv CONTENTS Approval Page .................................................................................................................... iii Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................ iv Table of Contents .................................................................................................................v List of Figures .................................................................................................................. viii List of Tables ..................................................................................................................... ix List of Abbreviations ...........................................................................................................x Abstract .............................................................................................................................. xi Chapter 1. Introduction ..............................................................................................................1 Hypotheses .........................................................................................................1 Nutrient Loads ...................................................................................................2 Nitrogenous Nutrients ........................................................................................3 Phosphorous Nutrients .......................................................................................6 Features of Ponds and Lakes Affect Algal Biodiversity ....................................8 Nuisance Algae ................................................................................................11 Summary of Dissertation .................................................................................14 References ........................................................................................................16 2. Water chemistry factors affecting phytoplankton biodiversity and toxin production in Southern California lentic habitats ..................................................20 Abstract ............................................................................................................21 Introduction ......................................................................................................22 Materials and Methods .....................................................................................25 Statistical Analyses ....................................................................................29 Results ..............................................................................................................30 Water Chemistry Factors Affecting Algal Biodiversity ............................30 Water Chemistry Factors Affecting Toxin Production ..............................33 Phytoplankton Biodiversity (Richness and Evenness) ..............................37 v Discussion ........................................................................................................40 Acknowledgments............................................................................................48 References ........................................................................................................49 3. Impact of Microcystis on algal biodiversity and use of new technology to remove Microcystis and dissolved nutrients ..........................................................53 Abstract ............................................................................................................54 Introduction ......................................................................................................55 Materials and Methods .....................................................................................58 Microcystis and Algal Biodiversity ...........................................................58 Algal Cultures ......................................................................................58 Statistical Analysis ...............................................................................59 Phosphate Restriction Assay at Mason Lake .............................................59 Blue ProTM Pilot Study at Mason Lake .......................................................60 Sample Acquisition ..............................................................................62 Algal Assay Technique ........................................................................63 Chlorophyll Assay Technique..............................................................63 Results ..............................................................................................................64 Algal Biodiversity Results .........................................................................64 Phosphate Restriction Assay at Mason Lake .............................................66 Blue ProTM Pilot Study at Mason Lake .......................................................67 Algal Assay Results .............................................................................67 Chlorophyll Assay Results ...................................................................68 Phosphate Results ................................................................................68 Discussion ........................................................................................................69 Conclusions ......................................................................................................72 Acknowledgments............................................................................................73 References ........................................................................................................74 4. Ecological impact of Southern California ponds and small lakes, and strategies for their conservation .............................................................................77 Abstract ............................................................................................................78
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Spatial Interactome Reveals the Protein Organization of the Algal
    HHS Public Access Author manuscript Author ManuscriptAuthor Manuscript Author Cell. Author Manuscript Author manuscript; Manuscript Author available in PMC 2018 September 21. Published in final edited form as: Cell. 2017 September 21; 171(1): 133–147.e14. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.08.044. A Spatial Interactome Reveals the Protein Organization of the Algal CO2 Concentrating Mechanism Luke C.M. Mackinder1,2, Chris Chen1,3, Ryan D. Leib4, Weronika Patena1, Sean R. Blum5, Matthew Rodman3, Silvia Ramundo6, Christopher M. Adams4, and Martin C. Jonikas1,3,7,8,* 1Department of Plant Biology, Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, CA 94305, USA 3Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA 4Stanford University Mass Spectrometry, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA 5Department of Biomolecular Engineering, UC Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA 6Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA 7Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA SUMMARY Approximately one-third of global CO2 fixation is performed by eukaryotic algae. Nearly all algae enhance their carbon assimilation by operating a CO2-concentrating mechanism (CCM) built around an organelle called the pyrenoid, whose protein composition is largely unknown. Here, we developed tools in the model alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii to determine the localizations of 135 candidate CCM proteins, and physical interactors of 38 of these proteins. Our data reveal the identity of 89 pyrenoid proteins, including Rubisco-interacting proteins, photosystem I assembly factor candidates and inorganic carbon flux components. We identify three previously un- described protein layers of the pyrenoid: a plate-like layer, a mesh layer and a punctate layer.
    [Show full text]
  • The Plankton Lifeform Extraction Tool: a Digital Tool to Increase The
    Discussions https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2021-171 Earth System Preprint. Discussion started: 21 July 2021 Science c Author(s) 2021. CC BY 4.0 License. Open Access Open Data The Plankton Lifeform Extraction Tool: A digital tool to increase the discoverability and usability of plankton time-series data Clare Ostle1*, Kevin Paxman1, Carolyn A. Graves2, Mathew Arnold1, Felipe Artigas3, Angus Atkinson4, Anaïs Aubert5, Malcolm Baptie6, Beth Bear7, Jacob Bedford8, Michael Best9, Eileen 5 Bresnan10, Rachel Brittain1, Derek Broughton1, Alexandre Budria5,11, Kathryn Cook12, Michelle Devlin7, George Graham1, Nick Halliday1, Pierre Hélaouët1, Marie Johansen13, David G. Johns1, Dan Lear1, Margarita Machairopoulou10, April McKinney14, Adam Mellor14, Alex Milligan7, Sophie Pitois7, Isabelle Rombouts5, Cordula Scherer15, Paul Tett16, Claire Widdicombe4, and Abigail McQuatters-Gollop8 1 10 The Marine Biological Association (MBA), The Laboratory, Citadel Hill, Plymouth, PL1 2PB, UK. 2 Centre for Environment Fisheries and Aquacu∑lture Science (Cefas), Weymouth, UK. 3 Université du Littoral Côte d’Opale, Université de Lille, CNRS UMR 8187 LOG, Laboratoire d’Océanologie et de Géosciences, Wimereux, France. 4 Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Prospect Place, Plymouth, PL1 3DH, UK. 5 15 Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle (MNHN), CRESCO, 38 UMS Patrinat, Dinard, France. 6 Scottish Environment Protection Agency, Angus Smith Building, Maxim 6, Parklands Avenue, Eurocentral, Holytown, North Lanarkshire ML1 4WQ, UK. 7 Centre for Environment Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas), Lowestoft, UK. 8 Marine Conservation Research Group, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth, PL4 8AA, UK. 9 20 The Environment Agency, Kingfisher House, Goldhay Way, Peterborough, PE4 6HL, UK. 10 Marine Scotland Science, Marine Laboratory, 375 Victoria Road, Aberdeen, AB11 9DB, UK.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution and Comparative Morphology of the Euglenophyte
    EVOLUTION AND COMPARATIVE MORPHOLOGY OF THE EUGLENOPHYTE PLASTID by PATRICK JERRY PAUL BROWN (Under the Direction of Mark A. Farmer) ABSTRACT My doctoral research centered on understanding the evolution of the euglenophyte protists, with special attention paid to their plastids. The euglenophytes are a widely distributed group of euglenid protists that have acquired a chloroplast via secondary symbiogenesis. The goals of my research were to 1) test the efficacy of plastid morphological and ultrastructural characters in phylogenetic analysis; 2) understand the process of plastid development and partitioning in the euglenophytes; 3) to use a plastid- encoded protein gene to determine a euglenophyte phylogeny; and 4) to perform a multi- gene analysis to uncover clues about the origins of the euglenophyte plastid. My work began with an alpha-taxonomic study that redefined the rare euglenophyte Euglena rustica. This work not only validly circumscribed the species, but also noted novel features of its habitat, cyclic migration habits, and cellular biology. This was followed by a study of plastid morphology and development in a number of diverse euglenophytes. The results of this study showed that the plastids of euglenophytes undergo drastic changes in morphology and ultrastructure over the course of a single cell division cycle. I concluded that there are four main classes of plastid development and partitioning in the euglenophytes, and that the class a given species will use is dependant on its interphase plastid morphology and the rigidity of the cell. The discovery of the class IV partitioning strategy in which cells with only one or very few plastids fragment their plastids prior to cell division was very significant.
    [Show full text]
  • Stromatolites
    Stromatolites What is a stromatolite? A stromatolite (literally, ‘layered rock’) is a solid structure created by single-celled microbes called cyanobacteria (blue-green algae). The cyanobacteria form colonies and trap sediment with their sticky surface coatings. The trapped sediment reacts to calcium carbonate in the water to form limestone. These limestone deposits build up very slowly – it can take a stromatolite 100 years to grow 5 cm. A 1 m-high stromatolite might be 2,000 years old! Where are they found? Shark Bay’s stromatolites are found around the shallows of Hamelin Pool , located in the southern part of the eastern bay. Between 4,000 to 6,000 years ago a massive seagrass bank called the Fauré Sill began to block tidal flow into Hamelin Pool, causing the water to become extremely concentrated, or hypersaline. The water in Hamelin Pool is twice as salty as water in the open ocean! Animals that would normally graze on algae, such as chitons and snails, cannot survive in these conditions. Around 3,000 years ago cyanobacteria started flourishing, forming stromatolites much as they did billions of years ago. More than 50 species of cyanobacteria live in Hamelin Pool. What do they look like? Stromatolites look like a cross between a cauliflower and a rock. However, unlike rocks they are actually alive – each stromatolite has a top surface layer teeming with living, active cyanobacteria. At least 3,000 million cyanobacteria can fit in 1 m2! Because cyanobacteria are plants, they photosynthesise their energy from the sun. A by-product of photosynthesis is oxygen, and if you look very carefully you may see the stromatolites gently ‘fizzing’ as tiny bubbles of oxygen are released by the cyanobacteria into the water.
    [Show full text]
  • JUDD W.S. Et. Al. (2002) Plant Systematics: a Phylogenetic Approach. Chapter 7. an Overview of Green
    UNCORRECTED PAGE PROOFS An Overview of Green Plant Phylogeny he word plant is commonly used to refer to any auto- trophic eukaryotic organism capable of converting light energy into chemical energy via the process of photosynthe- sis. More specifically, these organisms produce carbohydrates from carbon dioxide and water in the presence of chlorophyll inside of organelles called chloroplasts. Sometimes the term plant is extended to include autotrophic prokaryotic forms, especially the (eu)bacterial lineage known as the cyanobacteria (or blue- green algae). Many traditional botany textbooks even include the fungi, which differ dramatically in being heterotrophic eukaryotic organisms that enzymatically break down living or dead organic material and then absorb the simpler products. Fungi appear to be more closely related to animals, another lineage of heterotrophs characterized by eating other organisms and digesting them inter- nally. In this chapter we first briefly discuss the origin and evolution of several separately evolved plant lineages, both to acquaint you with these important branches of the tree of life and to help put the green plant lineage in broad phylogenetic perspective. We then focus attention on the evolution of green plants, emphasizing sev- eral critical transitions. Specifically, we concentrate on the origins of land plants (embryophytes), of vascular plants (tracheophytes), of 1 UNCORRECTED PAGE PROOFS 2 CHAPTER SEVEN seed plants (spermatophytes), and of flowering plants dons.” In some cases it is possible to abandon such (angiosperms). names entirely, but in others it is tempting to retain Although knowledge of fossil plants is critical to a them, either as common names for certain forms of orga- deep understanding of each of these shifts and some key nization (e.g., the “bryophytic” life cycle), or to refer to a fossils are mentioned, much of our discussion focuses on clade (e.g., applying “gymnosperms” to a hypothesized extant groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Lateral Gene Transfer of Anion-Conducting Channelrhodopsins Between Green Algae and Giant Viruses
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.15.042127; this version posted April 23, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 5 Lateral gene transfer of anion-conducting channelrhodopsins between green algae and giant viruses Andrey Rozenberg 1,5, Johannes Oppermann 2,5, Jonas Wietek 2,3, Rodrigo Gaston Fernandez Lahore 2, Ruth-Anne Sandaa 4, Gunnar Bratbak 4, Peter Hegemann 2,6, and Oded 10 Béjà 1,6 1Faculty of Biology, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel. 2Institute for Biology, Experimental Biophysics, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Invalidenstraße 42, Berlin 10115, Germany. 3Present address: Department of Neurobiology, Weizmann 15 Institute of Science, Rehovot 7610001, Israel. 4Department of Biological Sciences, University of Bergen, N-5020 Bergen, Norway. 5These authors contributed equally: Andrey Rozenberg, Johannes Oppermann. 6These authors jointly supervised this work: Peter Hegemann, Oded Béjà. e-mail: [email protected] ; [email protected] 20 ABSTRACT Channelrhodopsins (ChRs) are algal light-gated ion channels widely used as optogenetic tools for manipulating neuronal activity 1,2. Four ChR families are currently known. Green algal 3–5 and cryptophyte 6 cation-conducting ChRs (CCRs), cryptophyte anion-conducting ChRs (ACRs) 7, and the MerMAID ChRs 8. Here we 25 report the discovery of a new family of phylogenetically distinct ChRs encoded by marine giant viruses and acquired from their unicellular green algal prasinophyte hosts.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Analysis and Substitution Rate Estimation of Colonial Volvocine Algae Based on Mitochondrial Genomes
    G C A T T A C G G C A T genes Article Phylogenetic Analysis and Substitution Rate Estimation of Colonial Volvocine Algae Based on Mitochondrial Genomes Yuxin Hu 1,2, Weiyue Xing 1,2, Zhengyu Hu 3 and Guoxiang Liu 1,* 1 Key Laboratory of Algal Biology, Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430072, China; [email protected] (Y.H.); [email protected] (W.X.) 2 School of Life Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China 3 State Key Laboratory of Freshwater Ecology and Biotechnology, Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430072, China; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-027-6878-0576 Received: 11 December 2019; Accepted: 15 January 2020; Published: 20 January 2020 Abstract: We sequenced the mitochondrial genome of six colonial volvocine algae, namely: Pandorina morum, Pandorina colemaniae, Volvulina compacta, Colemanosphaera angeleri, Colemanosphaera charkowiensi, and Yamagishiella unicocca. Previous studies have typically reconstructed the phylogenetic relationship between colonial volvocine algae based on chloroplast or nuclear genes. Here, we explore the validity of phylogenetic analysis based on mitochondrial protein-coding genes. Wefound phylogenetic incongruence of the genera Yamagishiella and Colemanosphaera. In Yamagishiella, the stochastic error and linkage group formed by the mitochondrial protein-coding genes prevent phylogenetic analyses from reflecting the true relationship. In Colemanosphaera, a different reconstruction approach revealed a different phylogenetic relationship. This incongruence may be because of the influence of biological factors, such as incomplete lineage sorting or horizontal gene transfer. We also analyzed the substitution rates in the mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes between colonial volvocine algae.
    [Show full text]
  • The Genome of Prasinoderma Coloniale Unveils the Existence of a Third Phylum Within Green Plants
    Downloaded from orbit.dtu.dk on: Oct 10, 2021 The genome of Prasinoderma coloniale unveils the existence of a third phylum within green plants Li, Linzhou; Wang, Sibo; Wang, Hongli; Sahu, Sunil Kumar; Marin, Birger; Li, Haoyuan; Xu, Yan; Liang, Hongping; Li, Zhen; Cheng, Shifeng Total number of authors: 24 Published in: Nature Ecology & Evolution Link to article, DOI: 10.1038/s41559-020-1221-7 Publication date: 2020 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link back to DTU Orbit Citation (APA): Li, L., Wang, S., Wang, H., Sahu, S. K., Marin, B., Li, H., Xu, Y., Liang, H., Li, Z., Cheng, S., Reder, T., Çebi, Z., Wittek, S., Petersen, M., Melkonian, B., Du, H., Yang, H., Wang, J., Wong, G. K. S., ... Liu, H. (2020). The genome of Prasinoderma coloniale unveils the existence of a third phylum within green plants. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 4, 1220-1231. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-1221-7 General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
    [Show full text]
  • Carbon Cycling and Calcification in Hypersaline Microbial Mats
    Carbon cycling and calcification in hypersaline microbial mats Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Naturwissenschaften - Dr. rer. nat.- Dem Fachbereich Biologie/Chemie der Universität Bremen vorgelegt von Rebecca Ludwig Bremen März 2004 Die vorliegende Arbeit wurde in der Zeit von Oktober 2000 bis März 2004 am Max-Planck-Institut für marine Mikrobiologie in Bremen angefertigt. Gutachter Prof. Dr. Bo Barker Jørgensen Prof. Dr. Gunter O. Kirst Prüfer Prof. Dr. Friederike Koenig Dr. Henk M. Jonkers Tag des Promotionskolloqiums: 14. Mai 2004 Table of contents Table of contents Thesis outline v 1 Introduction 1 Prologue 3 Carbon cycle in microbial mats: Organisms and metabolism 8 Gradients and adaptations to diel changes 17 Calcification 20 Principles and applications of microsensors 22 Sampling/study sites 28 2 Structure and function of Chiprana mats 37 Structural and functional analysis of a microbial mat ecosystem from a unique permanent hypersaline inland lake: ‘La Salada de Chiprana’ (NE Spain) 3 Rate limitation in microbial mats 71 Limitation of oxygenic photosynthesis and respiration by phosphate and organic nitrogen in a hypersaline mat: A microsensor study 4 Effect of salinity on benthic photosynthesis 89 Reduced gas diffusivity and solubility limit metabolic rates in benthic phototrophs at high salinities 5 Calcification mechanism in a microbial mat 109 Photosynthesis controlled calcification in a hypersaline microbial mat 6 Stromatolite calcification and bioerosion 127 Balance between microbial calcification and metazoan bioerosion in modern stromatolitic oncolites Discussion 145 Summary 151 Zusammenfassung 153 Appendix 155 Danksagung 155 List of publications 157 iii Outline Thesis outline Five manuscripts are included in this thesis that investigate the carbon cycle in microbial mats with a special emphasis on community carbon flow and mechanisms of microbial calcification.
    [Show full text]
  • The Minor Transitions in Hierarchical Evolution and the Question of a Directional Bias
    The minor transitions in hierarchical evolution and the question of a directional bias D. W. McSHEA Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708-0338, USA Keywords: Abstract complexity; The history of life shows a clear trend in hierarchical organization, revealed by evolutionary trends; the successive emergence of organisms with ever greater numbers of levels of hierarchy; nestedness and greater development, or `individuation', of the highest level. major transitions. Various arguments have been offered which suggest that the trend is the result of a directional bias, or tendency, meaning that hierarchical increases are more probable than decreases among lineages, perhaps because hierarchical increases are favoured, on average, by natural selection. Further, what little evidence exists seems to point to a bias: some major increases are known ± including the origin of the eukaryotic cell from prokaryotic cells and of animals, fungi and land plants from solitary eukaryotic cells ± but no major decreases (except in parasitic and commensal organisms), at least at the cellular and multicellular levels. The fact of a trend, combined with the arguments and evidence, might make a bias seem beyond doubt, but here I argue that its existence is an open empirical question. Further, I show how testing is possible. Maynard Smith & SzathmaÂry, 1995, 1999; SzathmaÂry & Introduction Maynard Smith, 1995; McShea, 1996a; Pettersson, 1996; One of the most salient and certain trends in the history Heylighen, 1999; Stewart, 2000; Wright, 2000; Knoll & of life is the increase in hierarchical structure in organ- Bambach, 2000). It is also ± to my knowledge ± isms. Figure 1 shows the approximate trajectory of the unchallenged.
    [Show full text]
  • The Symbiotic Green Algae, Oophila (Chlamydomonadales
    University of Connecticut OpenCommons@UConn Master's Theses University of Connecticut Graduate School 12-16-2016 The yS mbiotic Green Algae, Oophila (Chlamydomonadales, Chlorophyceae): A Heterotrophic Growth Study and Taxonomic History Nikolaus Schultz University of Connecticut - Storrs, [email protected] Recommended Citation Schultz, Nikolaus, "The yS mbiotic Green Algae, Oophila (Chlamydomonadales, Chlorophyceae): A Heterotrophic Growth Study and Taxonomic History" (2016). Master's Theses. 1035. https://opencommons.uconn.edu/gs_theses/1035 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Connecticut Graduate School at OpenCommons@UConn. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of OpenCommons@UConn. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Symbiotic Green Algae, Oophila (Chlamydomonadales, Chlorophyceae): A Heterotrophic Growth Study and Taxonomic History Nikolaus Eduard Schultz B.A., Trinity College, 2014 A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science at the University of Connecticut 2016 Copyright by Nikolaus Eduard Schultz 2016 ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis was made possible through the guidance, teachings and support of numerous individuals in my life. First and foremost, Louise Lewis deserves recognition for her tremendous efforts in making this work possible. She has performed pioneering work on this algal system and is one of the preeminent phycologists of our time. She has spent hundreds of hours of her time mentoring and teaching me invaluable skills. For this and so much more, I am very appreciative and humbled to have worked with her. Thank you Louise! To my committee members, Kurt Schwenk and David Wagner, thank you for your mentorship and guidance.
    [Show full text]
  • Subunit Rrna Genes of the Genus Euglena Ehrenberg
    International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology (2001), 51, 773–781 Printed in Great Britain Phylogenetic analysis of chloroplast small- subunit rRNA genes of the genus Euglena Ehrenberg Department of Plant Rafał Milanowski, Boz0 ena Zakrys! and Jan Kwiatowski Systematics and Geography, Warsaw University, Al. Ujazdowskie 4, PL-00-478 ! Warszawa, Poland Author for correspondence: Boz0 ena Zakrys. Tel: j48 22 628 2595. Fax: j48 22 622 6646. e-mail: zakrys!mercury.ci.uw.edu.pl Almost complete sequences of plastid SSU rDNA (16S rDNA) from 17 species ! belonging to the order Euglenales (sensu Nemeth, 1997; Shi et al., 1999) were determined and used to infer phylogenetic relationships between 10 species of Euglena, three of Phacus, and one of each of Colacium, Lepocinclis, Strombomonas, Trachelomonas and Eutreptia. The maximum-parsimony (MP), maximum-likelihood (ML) and distance analyses of the unambiguously aligned sequence fragments imply that the genus Euglena is not monophyletic. Parsimony and distance methods divide Euglenaceae into two sister groups. One comprises of representatives from the subgenera Phacus, Lepocinclis and ! Discoglena (sensu Zakrys, 1986), whereas the other includes members of ! Euglena and Calliglena subgenera (sensu Zakrys, 1986), intermixed with representatives of Colacium, Strombomonas and Trachelomonas. In all analyses subgenera Euglena – together with Euglena polymorpha (representative of the subgenus Calliglena) – and Discoglena – together with Phacus and Lepocinclis – form two well-defined clades. The data clearly indicate that a substantial revision of euglenoid systematics is very much required, nevertheless it must await while more information can be gathered, allowing resolution of outstanding relationships. Keywords: chloroplast SSU rDNA, Euglena, Calliglena, Discoglena, molecular phylogeny INTRODUCTION The genus Euglena consists of organisms highly diversified with respect to cell architecture.
    [Show full text]