The Rage of Well-Fed Lions
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Theos Turbulentpriests Reform:Layout 1
Turbulent Priests? The Archbishop of Canterbury in contemporary English politics Daniel Gover Theos Friends’ Programme Theos is a public theology think tank which seeks to influence public opinion about the role of faith and belief in society. We were launched in November 2006 with the support of the Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Rowan Williams, and the Cardinal Archbishop of Westminster, Cardinal Cormac Murphy-O'Connor. We provide • high-quality research, reports and publications; • an events programme; • news, information and analysis to media companies and other opinion formers. We can only do this with your help! Theos Friends receive complimentary copies of all Theos publications, invitations to selected events and monthly email bulletins. If you would like to become a Friend, please detach or photocopy the form below, and send it with a cheque to Theos for £60. Thank you. Yes, I would like to help change public opinion! I enclose a cheque for £60 made payable to Theos. Name Address Postcode Email Tel Data Protection Theos will use your personal data to inform you of its activities. If you prefer not to receive this information please tick here By completing you are consenting to receiving communications by telephone and email. Theos will not pass on your details to any third party. Please return this form to: Theos | 77 Great Peter Street | London | SW1P 2EZ S: 97711: D: 36701: Turbulent Priests? what Theos is Theos is a public theology think tank which exists to undertake research and provide commentary on social and political arrangements. We aim to impact opinion around issues of faith and belief in The Archbishop of Canterbury society. -
Compassthe DIRECTION for the DEMOCRATIC LEFT
compassTHE DIRECTION FOR THE DEMOCRATIC LEFT MAPPING THE CENTRE GROUND Peter Kellner compasscontents Mapping the Centre Ground “This is a good time to think afresh about the way we do politics.The decline of the old ideologies has made many of the old Left-Right arguments redundant.A bold project to design a positive version of the Centre could fill the void.” Compass publications are intended to create real debate and discussion around the key issues facing the democratic left - however the views expressed in this publication are not a statement of Compass policy. compass Mapping the Centre Ground Peter Kellner All three leaders of Britain’s main political parties agree on one thing: elections are won and lost on the centre ground.Tony Blair insists that Labour has won the last three elections as a centre party, and would return to the wilderness were it to revert to left-wing policies. David Cameron says with equal fervour that the Conservatives must embrace the Centre if they are to return to power. Sir Menzies Campbell says that the Liberal Democrats occupy the centre ground out of principle, not electoral calculation, and he has nothing to fear from his rivals invading his space. What are we to make of all this? It is sometimes said that when any proposition commands such broad agreement, it is probably wrong. Does the shared obsession of all three party leaders count as a bad, consensual error – or are they right to compete for the same location on the left-right axis? This article is an attempt to answer that question, via an excursion down memory lane, a search for clear definitions and some speculation about the future of political debate. -
Carina Trimingham -V
Neutral Citation Number: [2012] EWHC 1296 (QB) Case No: HQ10D03060 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL Date: 24/05/2012 Before: THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Between: Carina Trimingham Claimant - and - Associated Newspapers Limited Defendant - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Matthew Ryder QC & William Bennett (instructed by Mishcon de Reya) for the Claimant Antony White QC & Alexandra Marzec (instructed by Reynolds Porter Chamberlain LLP) for the Defendant Hearing dates: 23,24,25,26,27 April 2012 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Approved Judgment I direct that pursuant to CPR PD 39A para 6.1 no official shorthand note shall be taken of this Judgment and that copies of this version as handed down may be treated as authentic. ............................. THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT Trimingham v. ANL Approved Judgment Mr Justice Tugendhat : 1. By claim form issued on 11 August 2010 the Claimant (“Ms Trimingham”) complained that the Defendant had wrongfully published private information concerning herself in eight articles. 2. Mr Christopher Huhne MP had been re-elected as the Member of Parliament for Eastleigh in Hampshire at the General Election held in May 2010, just over a month before the first of the articles complained of. He became Secretary of State for Energy in the Coalition Government. He was one of the leading figures in the Government and in the Liberal Democrat Party. In 2008 Ms Trimingham and Mr Huhne started an affair, unknown to both Mr Huhne’s wife, Ms Pryce, and Ms Trimingham’s civil partner. By 2008 Mr Huhne had become the Home Affairs spokesman for the Liberal Democrats. -
Bad News for Disabled People: How the Newspapers Are Reporting Disability
Strathclyde Centre for Disability Research and Glasgow Media Unit Bad News for Disabled People: How the newspapers are reporting disability In association with: Contents PAGE 1. Acknowledgements 2 2. Author details 3 3. Main findings 4 4. Summary 6 Part 2 5. Introduction 16 6. Methodology and Design 18 6.1 Content analysis 18 6.2 Audience reception analysis 20 7. Content analysis:Results 22 7.1 Political discussion and critiques of policy 22 7.2 Changes in the profile of disability coverage and ‘sympathetic’ portrayals 32 7.3 Changes in the profile of representations of the ‘undeserving’ disability claimant 38 8. Audience reception analysis 59 8.1 How is disability reported in the media 59 8.2 Views on disabled people 62 8.3 Views on benefits and benefit claimants 64 8.4 Views on government policy 67 9. Conclusion 69 10. References 73 Appendix 1. Coding schedule 80 Appendix 2. Detailed descriptors for coding and analysis 85 1 Acknowledgements This research was commissioned by Inclusion London and their financial sponsorship and administrative backing is gratefully recognised. In particular we would like to acknowledge the help and collaborative support of Anne Kane who provided us with very valuable and helpful advice throughout the research and had a significant input in the drafting of the final report. We would also like to thank the following researchers who worked in the Glasgow Media Group and who tirelessly, carefully and painstakingly undertook the content analysis of the media: Stevie Docherty, Louise Gaw, Daniela Latina, Colin Macpherson, Hannah Millar and Sarah Watson. We are grateful to Allan Sutherland and Jo Ferrie for their contributions to the data collection. -
The Conservative Parliamentary Party the Conservative Parliamentary Party
4 Philip Cowley and Mark Stuart The Conservative parliamentary party The Conservative parliamentary party Philip Cowley and Mark Stuart 1 When the Conservative Party gathered for its first party conference since the 1997 general election, they came to bury the parliamentary party, not to praise it. The preceding five years had seen the party lose its (long-enjoyed) reputation for unity, and the blame for this was laid largely at the feet of the party’s parliamentarians.2 As Peter Riddell noted in The Times, ‘speaker after speaker was loudly cheered whenever they criticised the parliamentary party and its divisions’.3 It was an argument with which both the outgoing and incoming Prime Ministers were in agreement. Just before the 1997 general election, John Major confessed to his biographer that ‘I love my party in the country, but I do not love my parliamentary party’; he was later to claim that ‘divided views – expressed without restraint – in the parliamentary party made our position impossible’.4 And in his first address to the massed ranks of the new parliamentary Labour Party after the election Tony Blair drew attention to the state of the Conservative Party: Look at the Tory Party. Pause. Reflect. Then vow never to emulate. Day after day, when in government they had MPs out there, behaving with the indiscipline and thoughtlessness that was reminiscent of us in the early 80s. Where are they now, those great rebels? His answer was simple: not in Parliament. ‘When the walls came crashing down beneath the tidal wave of change, there was no discrimination between those Tory MPs. -
Bibliography
BIBLIOGRAPHY A. INTERVIEWS Jacob Rees-Mogg MP (London), 9th February 2016. Jesse Norman MP (London), 12th September 2016. Nicholas Winterton (Cheshire), 23rd September 2016. Ann Winterton (Cheshire), 23rd September 2016. Peter Hitchens (London), 11th October 2016. Anne Widdecombe (London), 11th October 2016. Lord Salisbury (London), 12th October 2016. Sir William Cash MP (London), 13th October 2016. Sir Edward Leigh MP (London), 17th January 2017. David Burrowes MP (London), 17th January 2017. Charles Moore (London), 17th January 2017. Philip Davies MP (London), 19th January 2017. Sir Gerald Howarth MP (London), 19th January 2017. Dr. Myles Harris (London), 27th January 2017. Lord Sudeley (London), 6th February 2017. Jonathan Aitken (London), 6th February 2017. David Nicholson (London), 13th February 2017. Gregory Lauder-Frost (telephone), 23rd February 2017. Richard Ritchie (London), 8th March 2017. Tim Janman (London), 27th March 2017. Lord Deben (London), 4th April 2017. Lord Griffths of Fforestfach (London), 6th April 2017. Lord Tebbit (London), 6th April 2017. Sir Adrian Fitzgerald (London), 10th April 2017. © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2020 191 K. Hickson, Britain’s Conservative Right since 1945, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27697-3 192 BIBLIOGRAPHY Edward Norman (telephone), 28th April 2017. Cedric Gunnery (London), 2nd May 2017. Paul Bristol (London), 3rd May 2017. Harvey Thomas (London), 3rd May 2017. Ian Crowther (telephone), 12th May 2017. Iain Duncan Smith MP (London), 4th July 2017. Angela Ellis-Jones (London), 4th July 2017. John Hayes MP (London), 4th July 2017. Dennis Walker (London), 24th July 2017. Lord Howard of Lympne (London), 12th September 2017. -
Chavs: the Demonization of the Working Class
Chavs: The Demonization of the Working Class Chavs, written more than five years ago, is a polemic about a society that was unnecessarily unjust, cruel, divided; since its original publication in 2011 Britain has only become more unjust, cruel and divided. The book appeared in print less than twelve months after the Conservatives returned to Downing Street, after thirteen years in the political wilderness, and it had three central purposes: to refute the myth that Britain is a classless society, when in fact huge amounts of wealth and power are concentrated in very few hands; to tackle the poisonous mantra that social problems like poverty are actually individual failings; and to encourage the idea that social progress comes about by people with similar economic interests organizing together to change society. In the 1980s, Thatcherism remodelled British society. Since 2010, the Tory government has busined itself with an ambitious project for rolling back the state in an effort to complete Thatcher’s work. On the one hand, for the sorts of people who tend to fund the Conservative Party – not least those in the financial sector that plunged Britain into an economic mire – the last few years have been a boomtime. During one of the great economic truaumas of modern British history, the fortunes of the wealthiest 1000 britons more than doubled. On the other, the plight of working people stands in stark contrast. Workers suffered the longest fall in pay packets since the 1870s. And then there was the hunger. Britain is one of the richest societies ever to exist and yet hundreds of thousands of Britons depend on food banks for their meals. -
Chronology of Recent Events
AUSTRALIAN NEWSPAPER HISTORY GROUP NEWSLETTER ISSN 1443-4962 No. 38 July 2006 Compiled for the ANHG by Rod Kirkpatrick, 13 Sumac Street, Middle Park, Qld, 4074. Ph. 07-3279 2279. E-mail: [email protected] 38.1 COPY DEADLINE AND WEBSITE ADDRESS Deadline for next Newsletter: 30 September 2006. Subscription details appear at end of Newsletter. [Number 1 appeared October 1999.] The Newsletter is online through the “Publications” link of the University of Queensland’s School of Journalism & Communication Website at www.uq.edu.au/journ-comm/ and through the ePrint Archives at the University of Queensland at http://eprint.uq.edu.au/) 38.2 EDITOR’S NOTE This issue of the Newsletter introduces some minor changes in format intended to make it easier for readers to find items such as those recording deaths of newspaper identities and those listing recent publications. The section, “Recent Chronology of Events”, has been abbreviated to “Recent Chronology” and split into sub-sections labelled “Newspaper Events” (with dates in bold) and “Deaths” (with names in bold). In the section for “Recently Published”, books, theses and articles are now listed alphabetically by author’s surname (with names in bold). The ANHG is to enter the book-publishing arena again. For details, see 38.54. CURRENT DEVELOPMENTS: METROPOLITAN 38.3 SUNDAY TIMES ENTERS PERTH’S DAILY ONLINE SCENE News Limited has developed a new daily newspaper for Perth and Western Australia, but you won‟t see it in the newsagencies or supermarkets. Called PerthNow, it is available only online (at perthnow.com.au). It had a soft launch on Sunday, 19 June, and was then published daily (Mediaweek, 26 June 2006, pp.1, 7). -
Femininity, Consumption and Journalistic Professional Identity
CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Goldsmiths Research Online 1 News and Shoes: Femininity, Consumption and Journalistic Professional Identity Hatty Oliver Goldsmiths College, University of London PhD Media and Communications, 2011 2 Abstract This thesis explores the professional cultures, capital and occupational identities of a group of women journalists working in contemporary London‐ based women’s magazines and newspaper supplements. I have mapped this journalistic subfield in order to answer questions about the gendering of hierarchies and structures in the wider journalistic field and the opportunities and limitations provided by women’s traditional associations with consumption. Commercial journalism created for, and by women, plays an increasingly important editorial and commercial role within journalism, but has received little academic attention. In this research I demarcate a distinct subfield of print journalism that I term feminine journalism. This female oriented subfield is concerned with lifestyle, fashion, celebrity and the body and extends across women’s magazines and newspapers. My research is based on analysis of qualitative semi‐structured interviews with a cross‐section of forty journalists from across the subfield. I use Bourdieu’s notion of habitus and field to interrogate the gendered journalistic cultures that mediate the production of feminine journalism. Through a detailed consideration of working practices, routines and occupational identities, I document a journalistic domain dominated by consumption, taste and aesthetics and inextricably enmeshed with the adjoining commercial fields of fashion and beauty brands. I explore the way in which the cultural and economic interlink to produce a version of commercial femininity, which helps to constitute subjective identities for both practitioners and readers. -
Britain's Conservative Right Since 1945 Traditional Toryism in A
Britain’s Conservative Right since 1945 Traditional Toryism in a Cold Climate Kevin Hickson Britain’s Conservative Right since 1945 Kevin Hickson Britain’s Conservative Right since 1945 Traditional Toryism in a Cold Climate Kevin Hickson Department of Politics University of Liverpool Liverpool, UK ISBN 978-3-030-27696-6 ISBN 978-3-030-27697-3 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27697-3 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2020 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifcally the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microflms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specifc statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affliations. -
237 Albert, Hans, 152 Allais, Maurice, 29 Allen, R. G. D., 23 American
Index Albert, Hans, 152 Boyle, Andrew, 192 Allais, Maurice, 29 Breuer, Josef, 5 Allen, R. G. D., 23 British Connection (McCormick), 184, American-Austrian School, 2, 8–11 190–4 anarchy, 221–2 British Empire, 32 Ancien Régime, 1, 4 British School, 7, 8, 25, 75 Arrow, Kenneth, 23 Buchanan, James, 29 Attlee, Clement, 52–3, 186 Burgess, Guy, 189 Austrian Institute for Business Cycle Burns, Arthur, 28 Research, 82 Austrian School, 19, 32, 128 Caldwell, Bruce, 43, 57n4, 90 and Hayek, 1–15 The Cambridge Apostles (McCormick), members of, 2, 15–18 194–5 origins of, 2 Cambridge School, 7, 8, 25, 75 rise of, 5 Campbell, Glenn, 181 Ayer, A. J., 217 Cannan, Edwin, 7–8 capitalism, 51, 56, 78, 127, 132 Bartley, William Warren III, 2, 3, capital theory, 4, 66, 74 22, 36–7, 109, 147–209, 213–24, cartels, 36 234–6 Cecil, Robert, 189 biography of Erhard by, 174–7 central planning, 44–50, 66 biography of Popper by, 177–8 Chamberlin, Henry, 50 biography of Wittgenstein by, Chicago School, 25, 26, 27, 132 171–4 Churchill, Winston, 52–3 break with Christianity by, 159–62 citations, 61–5, 67–9 Collected Works, 196–202 classical economics, 3–4, 36, and Hayek, 178–202 77, 128 and justificationism, 213–18 Coase, Ronald, 24–6, 29 and Lakatos, 162–71, 200, 202 Coase Theorem, 24–5 and Popper, 162–71, 177–8, 200, Cold War, 1, 29 202, 213–14, 216 The Collected Works of F.A. Hayek Bass model, 63–5, 68 (Bartley), 2, 196–202, 229–30 Battle of Solferino, 5 communism, 5, 49, 186 Becker, Gary, 29 The Communist Manifesto (Marx and Belcredi, Richard, 15 Engels), 4, 5 Besters, Hans, 101, 102 competition, 98, 131–2, 135 Beveridge, William, 28, 51 Conservative party, 55 Beves, Donald, 186–7 The Constitution of Liberty Bismarck, Otto von, 4, 127 (Hayek), 49 Block, Walter, 99 constructivist rationalists, 214 Böhm-Bawerk, Eugen von, 2, 4, 11, Cox, Archibald, 179 16–17 critical rationalists, 218 Bork, Robert, 35 Cubitt, C. -
The Conservative Party and Thatcherism, 1970-1979: a Grass-Roots Perspective
CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by University of Birmingham Research Archive, E-theses Repository The Conservative Party and Thatcherism, 1970-1979: A Grass-Roots Perspective by Daniel Anthony Cowdrill B.A (Hons) M.Phil A thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the degree of Master of Philosophy Department of Medieval and Modern History College of Arts and Law The University of Birmingham September 2009 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Abstract This thesis argues that ‘Thatcherism’ was consistent with the values and interests of the Conservative party. The threat of socialism was pervasive and underpinned by the party’s socio- economic base. The economic status of the middle class, under threat from inflation, pay controls, taxation, organised trade unions, and even comprehensive education, resulted in a strong emphasis on individual freedom. The free market, property, and choice, with their strong norm of methodological individualism, were the Thatcherite alternative. This strengthened those with skills and qualifications but destroyed the collective structures that supported those without. Thatcherite historiography is exercised most by intellectual high politics while the broader Conservative party has been neglected.