DOCSLIB.ORG

Poor Journalism: Framing Poverty and Welfare in the British Press During the ‘Age of Neoliberalism’ 1985-2015

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Poor Journalism: Framing Poverty and Welfare in the British Press During the ‘Age of Neoliberalism’ 1985-2015 Poor journalism: Framing poverty and welfare in the British press during the ‘age of neoliberalism’ 1985-2015 Steven Harkins A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. University of Sheffield, Department of Journalism Studies, March 2017 1 2 Abstract This thesis examines 4070 articles in the British press written between 1985 and 2015. This longitudinal approach captures a timeframe which has been described by scholars as the ‘age of neoliberalism’. In order to understand how the neoliberal paradigm emerged, the thesis outlines a history of ideas about poverty in the UK national press which have developed across key periods characterised by individualism, collectivism, and a return to individualism. Individualism has been linked to neoliberal ideology, placing the individual consumer in the free market at the centre of political, social and economic decision making. This free market ideology undermines the case for the welfare state and is often used to criticise individuals experiencing poverty as failed capitalists or consumers rather than as victims of an unjust system. This thesis examines the extent to which this neoliberal ideology has been reflected in news coverage of poverty and welfare by examining news, politics and ideology. It finds that the press have engaged in a process of institutionalised social exclusion of welfare recipients who they construct as an ‘undeserving other’ who threatens ‘mainstream’ values. In doing so, the press have largely ignored inequality and the risk that poverty presents to many people by constructing it as an issue which only affects ‘others’ with behavioural problems. This behavioural diagnosis of poverty was consolidated in the early days of the commercial press and was used to blame impoverished people for their own poverty. This thesis analyses how the British press have reinforced neoliberal ideology by repackaging a set of claims about poverty and welfare which are rooted in the historical concepts of the ‘deserving’ and ‘undeserving’ poor. 3 4 Table of Contents ABSTRACT ......................................................................................................... 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ...................................................................................... 5 TABLE OF FIGURES ........................................................................................ 10 TABLE OF TABLES .......................................................................................... 12 ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................. 13 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................ 14 1.1 RESEARCH QUESTIONS ..................................................................................................... 16 1.2 WHY STUDY NEWS COVERAGE OF POVERTY IN THE UNITED KINGDOM? ..................................... 17 1.2.1. The editorial position of the British press ...................................................... 18 1.3 WHY THE NEOLIBERAL TIME PERIOD? .................................................................................. 21 1.4 NEOLIBERALISM AND INEQUALITY ....................................................................................... 23 1.5 STRUCTURE OF THE THESIS ................................................................................................ 25 2. LITERATURE REVIEW .............................................................................. 29 2.1 THE BATTLE OF IDEAS: POVERTY AND JOURNALISM FROM THE ELIZABETHAN POOR LAWS TO THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION 1597-1815 ..................................................................................... 32 2.2 THE VICTORIANS: POVERTY AND JOURNALISM IN THE ‘AGE OF INDIVIDUALISM’ 1815-1914 .......... 44 2.2.1 The Poor Laws and the radical press 1815-1855 ............................................ 44 2.2.2. Imperialism and the commercial press 1855-1914 ....................................... 54 2.3 THE COLD WAR: POVERTY AND JOURNALISM IN THE ‘AGE OF COLLECTIVISM’ 1917-1975 ............ 67 2.3.1 Poverty in the ‘age of collectivism’ 1917-1970 ............................................... 67 2.3.2 Thinking the unthinkable: the roots of neoliberalism 1930-1975 .................. 76 5 2.4 POVERTY, POLITICS AND JOURNALISM IN THE ‘AGE OF NEOLIBERALISM’ 1974-1984 .................... 82 2.4.1 Poverty, politics and news coverage 1974-1984 ............................................ 82 2.5 CHAPTER SUMMARY ........................................................................................................ 86 3. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK .................................................................. 89 3.1 CONSTRUCTING THE ‘DESERVING’ AND ‘UNDESERVING’ POOR IN THE NEWS ................................ 89 3.2 POVERTY AND WELFARE IN THE AGE OF NEOLIBERALISM .......................................................... 92 3.3. POVERTY, POLITICS AND THE ‘FOURTH ESTATE’ .................................................................... 95 3.3.1. The importance of news sources ................................................................. 100 3.4. NEOLIBERALISM AS IDEOLOGY IN THE BRITISH PRESS ........................................................... 102 3.5. CHAPTER SUMMARY..................................................................................................... 112 4. METHODS AND METHODOLOGY .......................................................... 114 4.1. METHODOLOGY .......................................................................................................... 114 4.1.1. Objectivity and the position of the researcher ............................................ 114 4.1.2. Social constructionism and critical realism as a research paradigm ............ 118 4.1.3. Sociology and media studies ........................................................................ 123 4.2 RESEARCH METHODS ..................................................................................................... 126 4.2.1 Content analysis ............................................................................................ 126 4.2.1.1 Operationalising content analysis in Chapter 5 ......................................... 127 4.2.2 Framing analysis ............................................................................................ 132 4.2.2.1. Operationalising framing analysis in Chapter 6 ........................................ 141 4.2.2.2. Operationalising framing analysis in Chapter 7 ........................................ 148 4.2.2.3. Operationalising framing analysis in Chapter 8 ........................................ 152 4.2.2.4. Operationalising framing analysis in Chapter 9 ........................................ 154 4.3 SAMPLING ................................................................................................................... 157 6 5. THE ‘DESERVING’ AND ‘UNDESERVING’ POOR IN THE ‘AGE OF NEOLIBERALISM’ .......................................................................................... 159 5.1 POVERTY AND POLITICS .................................................................................................. 160 5.2 THE ‘DESERVING’ POOR .................................................................................................. 163 5.3 THE ‘UNDESERVING’ POOR .............................................................................................. 168 6. THE POLITICS OF POVERTY AND THE POVERTY OF POLITICS ....... 174 6.1. REFLECTING POLITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON POVERTY ............................................................. 178 6.2. FRAMING POVERTY: 1985-1997 ................................................................................... 180 6.3. FRAMING POVERTY 1997-2010 .................................................................................... 191 6.4. FRAMING POVERTY 2010-2014 .................................................................................... 198 6.5. CASE STUDY: FRAMING THE SPARE ROOM SUBSIDY ............................................................. 205 6.5.1. Defending the British State from the ‘loony left’ ......................................... 207 6.5.2. Reporting Rolnik in the liberal press ............................................................ 214 7. POOR SOURCES: ‘EXPERT’ VOICES IN REPORTING FOOD AND FUEL POVERTY ....................................................................................................... 216 7.1. SOURCING FOOD POVERTY ............................................................................................ 218 7.1.1. Sourcing food poverty in the liberal press ................................................... 225 7.1.2. Sourcing food poverty in the conservative press ......................................... 229 7.1.3. Reporting food poverty summary ................................................................ 236 7.2. SOURCING FUEL POVERTY .............................................................................................. 236 7.2.1. Sourcing fuel poverty in the liberal press ..................................................... 239 7.2.2. Sourcing fuel poverty in the conservative press .......................................... 243 8. BLAMING THE VICTIMS: NEWS FRAMING OF THE WELFARE STATE 249 7 8.1. FRAMING THE WELFARE STATE 1985-1997 ..................................................................... 250 8.1.1. Single Mothers, the ‘underclass’
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Theos Turbulentpriests Reform:Layout 1
    Turbulent Priests? The Archbishop of Canterbury in contemporary English politics Daniel Gover Theos Friends’ Programme Theos is a public theology think tank which seeks to influence public opinion about the role of faith and belief in society. We were launched in November 2006 with the support of the Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Rowan Williams, and the Cardinal Archbishop of Westminster, Cardinal Cormac Murphy-O'Connor. We provide • high-quality research, reports and publications; • an events programme; • news, information and analysis to media companies and other opinion formers. We can only do this with your help! Theos Friends receive complimentary copies of all Theos publications, invitations to selected events and monthly email bulletins. If you would like to become a Friend, please detach or photocopy the form below, and send it with a cheque to Theos for £60. Thank you. Yes, I would like to help change public opinion! I enclose a cheque for £60 made payable to Theos. Name Address Postcode Email Tel Data Protection Theos will use your personal data to inform you of its activities. If you prefer not to receive this information please tick here By completing you are consenting to receiving communications by telephone and email. Theos will not pass on your details to any third party. Please return this form to: Theos | 77 Great Peter Street | London | SW1P 2EZ S: 97711: D: 36701: Turbulent Priests? what Theos is Theos is a public theology think tank which exists to undertake research and provide commentary on social and political arrangements. We aim to impact opinion around issues of faith and belief in The Archbishop of Canterbury society.
    [Show full text]
  • Welfare State Regimes: a Literature Review
    Welfare State Regimes: a Literature Review Arshad Isakjee IRIS WORKING PAPER SERIES, NO. 18/2017 www.birmingham.ac.uk/iris IRiS Working Paper Series The Institute for Research into Superdiversity (IRiS) Working Paper Series is intended to aid the rapid distribution of work in progress, research findings and special lectures by researchers and associates of the Institute. Papers aim to stimulate discussion among scholars, policymakers and practitioners and will address a range of topics including issues surrounding population dynamics, security, cohesion and integration, identity, global networks, rights and citizenship, diasporic and transnational activities, service delivery, wellbeing, social exclusion and the opportunities which superdiverse societies offer to support economic recovery. The IRiS WP Series is edited by Dr Nando Sigona at the Institute for Research into Superdiversity, University of Birmingham. We welcome proposals for Working Papers from researchers, policymakers and practitioners; for queries and proposals, please contact: [email protected]. All papers are peer-reviewed before publication. The opinions expressed in the papers are solely those of the author/s who retain the copyright. They should not be attributed to the project funders or the Institute for Research into Superdiversity, the School of Social Policy or the University of Birmingham. Papers are distributed free of charge in PDF format via the IRiS website. Hard copies will be occasionally available at IRiS public events. This Working Paper is also part of UPWEB Working Paper Series (No.5/2017) For more info on UPWEB: http://www.birmingham.ac.uk/generic/upweb/index.aspx 2 | IRIS WORKING PAPER SERIES NO.18/2017 Abstract This literature review seeks to position the UPWEB research project in relation to discourses on welfare regimes.
    [Show full text]
  • What's Right with Welfare? the Other Face of AFDC
    The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare Volume 16 Issue 2 June - Special Issue on Social Justice, Article 2 Values, and Social Work Practice June 1989 What's Right with Welfare? The Other Face of AFDC Ronald B. Dear University of Washington Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/jssw Part of the Social Welfare Commons, and the Social Work Commons Recommended Citation Dear, Ronald B. (1989) "What's Right with Welfare? The Other Face of AFDC," The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare: Vol. 16 : Iss. 2 , Article 2. Available at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/jssw/vol16/iss2/2 This Article is brought to you by the Western Michigan University School of Social Work. For more information, please contact [email protected]. What's Right with Welfare? The Other Face of AFDC' RONALD B. DEAR University of Washington School of Social Work Eleven million people, mostly mothers and children, depend on Aid to Families with Dependent Children, America's largest child welfare pro- gram. Much is wrong with AFDC welfare, and serious efforts are being made, again, to reform it. So far, no major attempts at reform have been successful. If reform is to succeed, we must understand what needs to be corrected and what does not. What's right with welfare? This study, not an apology or excuse for AFDC, answers that rarely asked question. Part I surveys back- ground. Part II cites myths and criticisms of AFDC and portrays pov- erty as it afflicts children and female-headed households. The focus of the analysis is on the depiction of 12 positive features of AFDC.
    [Show full text]
  • Welfare Reform and Political Theory
    WELFARE REFORM AND POLITICAL THEORY WELFARE REFORM AND POLITICAL THEORY LAWRENCE M. MEAD AND CHRISTOPHER BEEM EDITORS Russell Sage Foundation • New York The Russell Sage Foundation The Russell Sage Foundation, one of the oldest of America’s general purpose foundations, was established in 1907 by Mrs. Margaret Olivia Sage for “the improvement of social and living conditions in the United States.” The Founda- tion seeks to fulfill this mandate by fostering the development and dissemina- tion of knowledge about the country’s political, social, and economic problems. While the Foundation endeavors to assure the accuracy and objectivity of each book it publishes, the conclusions and interpretations in Russell Sage Founda- tion publications are those of the authors and not of the Foundation, its Trustees, or its staff. Publication by Russell Sage, therefore, does not imply Foundation endorsement. BOARD OF TRUSTEES Robert E. Denham, Chair Alan S. Blinder Larry V. Hedges Alan B. Krueger Christine K. Cassel Jennifer L. Hochschild Cora B. Marrett Thomas D. Cook Timothy A. Hultquist Eric Wanner Christopher Edley Jr. Kathleen Hall Jamieson Mary C. Waters John A. Ferejohn Melvin J. Konner Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Welfare reform and political theory / Lawrence M. Mead and Christopher Beem, editors. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0-87154-595-0 1. Public welfare—United States. 2. Public welfare—Great Britain. 3. Welfare recipients—Employment—United States. 4. Welfare recipients—Employment— Great Britain. 5. United States—Social policy—1993- 6. Great Britain—Social policy—1979- 7. Public welfare—Political aspects. 8. Citizenship. I. Mead, Lawrence M. II.
    [Show full text]
  • Carina Trimingham -V
    Neutral Citation Number: [2012] EWHC 1296 (QB) Case No: HQ10D03060 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL Date: 24/05/2012 Before: THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Between: Carina Trimingham Claimant - and - Associated Newspapers Limited Defendant - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Matthew Ryder QC & William Bennett (instructed by Mishcon de Reya) for the Claimant Antony White QC & Alexandra Marzec (instructed by Reynolds Porter Chamberlain LLP) for the Defendant Hearing dates: 23,24,25,26,27 April 2012 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Approved Judgment I direct that pursuant to CPR PD 39A para 6.1 no official shorthand note shall be taken of this Judgment and that copies of this version as handed down may be treated as authentic. ............................. THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT Trimingham v. ANL Approved Judgment Mr Justice Tugendhat : 1. By claim form issued on 11 August 2010 the Claimant (“Ms Trimingham”) complained that the Defendant had wrongfully published private information concerning herself in eight articles. 2. Mr Christopher Huhne MP had been re-elected as the Member of Parliament for Eastleigh in Hampshire at the General Election held in May 2010, just over a month before the first of the articles complained of. He became Secretary of State for Energy in the Coalition Government. He was one of the leading figures in the Government and in the Liberal Democrat Party. In 2008 Ms Trimingham and Mr Huhne started an affair, unknown to both Mr Huhne’s wife, Ms Pryce, and Ms Trimingham’s civil partner. By 2008 Mr Huhne had become the Home Affairs spokesman for the Liberal Democrats.
    [Show full text]
  • Clothing the New Poor Law Workhouse in the Nineteenth Century1
    Clothing the New Poor Law Workhouse in the Nineteenth Century1 Peter Jones*, Steven King*, Karen Thompson** * Department of History, University of Leicester, United Kingdom; ** Centre for Textile Conservation, University of Glasgow, United Kingdom Corresponding author: Peter Jones; email: [email protected] The workhouse remains a totemic institution for social historians, yet we still know very about the day-to-day experiences of the indoor poor. Nowhere is this clearer than in discussions about workhouse clothing, which remain overwhelmingly negative in the literature and consistent with the predominant view of the workhouse as a place of suffering and humiliation. Yet more often than not, this view is based on relatively shallow empirical foundations and tends to rely on anecdotal evidence or on the uncritical use of subjective sources such as photographs, newspaper editorials and other cultural products. This article takes a different approach by looking again at the whole range of meanings that workhouse clothing held for paupers and those who oversaw its allocation, and at the practical and symbolic usages to which it was put by them. On the basis of this evidence the authors argue that, contrary to the orthodox view, workhouse clothing was rarely intended to be degrading or stigmatising; that it would have held very different meanings for different classes of paupers; and that, far from being a source of unbridled misery, paupers often found it to be a source of great strategic and practical value. Keywords: workhouse, clothing, poverty, poor law, pauper agency Introduction Notwithstanding the fact that outdoor relief remained the modus operandi of the New Poor Law throughout its existence, the workhouse still holds a firm grip on the historiographical and public imagination.
    [Show full text]
  • Bad News for Disabled People: How the Newspapers Are Reporting Disability
    Strathclyde Centre for Disability Research and Glasgow Media Unit Bad News for Disabled People: How the newspapers are reporting disability In association with: Contents PAGE 1. Acknowledgements 2 2. Author details 3 3. Main findings 4 4. Summary 6 Part 2 5. Introduction 16 6. Methodology and Design 18 6.1 Content analysis 18 6.2 Audience reception analysis 20 7. Content analysis:Results 22 7.1 Political discussion and critiques of policy 22 7.2 Changes in the profile of disability coverage and ‘sympathetic’ portrayals 32 7.3 Changes in the profile of representations of the ‘undeserving’ disability claimant 38 8. Audience reception analysis 59 8.1 How is disability reported in the media 59 8.2 Views on disabled people 62 8.3 Views on benefits and benefit claimants 64 8.4 Views on government policy 67 9. Conclusion 69 10. References 73 Appendix 1. Coding schedule 80 Appendix 2. Detailed descriptors for coding and analysis 85 1 Acknowledgements This research was commissioned by Inclusion London and their financial sponsorship and administrative backing is gratefully recognised. In particular we would like to acknowledge the help and collaborative support of Anne Kane who provided us with very valuable and helpful advice throughout the research and had a significant input in the drafting of the final report. We would also like to thank the following researchers who worked in the Glasgow Media Group and who tirelessly, carefully and painstakingly undertook the content analysis of the media: Stevie Docherty, Louise Gaw, Daniela Latina, Colin Macpherson, Hannah Millar and Sarah Watson. We are grateful to Allan Sutherland and Jo Ferrie for their contributions to the data collection.
    [Show full text]
  • G 3-19 Comprehensive Educa Volume 42 Number 3 Autumn 2000
    ISSN 0963-8253 g 3-19 comprehensive educa Volume 42 BRIAN SIMON. Blair on Educatior Number 3 ANNABELLE DIXON Fire Blankets or Depth Charges: Autumn 2000 choices in education for citizenship HILLEVILENZ TAGUCHI. 'Doing Reggio'? No, 'Doing Difference' in Co-operative Learning LAURA SIMON Issues in the Provision of Deaf Education PIP MARPLES & TYRELL BURGESS. General Teaching Council: whose voice will be heard? TREVOR KERRY Learning and Testing: debates and dilemmas ANNABELLE DIXON. Too Much Too Young JUDITH JUDD Tony Blair Should be Proud to Send his Children to Hounslow Manor. So Why Does it Face Closure? IAN DUCKETT. Up for a New Curriculum JENNY THEWLIS. An Education in Education: Penguin Education (and Penguin Education Specials) TRIANGLE DEREK GILLARD The Plowden Report BRIAN SIMON. George Freeland EDITORS (89- 123) Contents CLYDE CHITTY, Goldsmiths College, University of London (also Book Reviews Editor) VOLUME 42 NUMBER 3 2000 ANNABELLE DIXON, Lucy Cavendish College, University of Cambridge Editorial. 89 EDITORIAL BOARD BRIAN SIMON. Blair on Education 91 MICHAEL ARMSTRONG, formerly ANNABELLE DIXON. Fire Blankets or Depth Harwell County Primary School, Oxfordshire Charges: choices in education for citizenship 94 {Chairperson) HILLEVI LENZ TAGUCHI. 'Doing Reggio'? MARY JANE DRUMMOND, School of Education, No, 'Doing Difference' in Co-operative Learning 100 University of Cambridge LAURA SIMON. Issues in the Provision MICHAEL FIELDING, Department of Education, of Deaf Education 103 University of Sussex LESLEY JONES. A letter to DEREK GILLARD, Educational Consultant, Oxford David Blunkett and a DfEE reply 107 ANDY GREEN, Post-16 Education Centre, Institute of Education, University of London PIP MARPLES & TYRELL BURGESS. General Teaching Council: whose voice will be heard? 108 BRENDA HANSON, King's College, London JANE McGREGOR, The Open University TREVOR KERRY.
    [Show full text]
  • Welfare, Work, and American Indians November 2001
    Acknowledgements This report was made possible through funding from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the W. K. Kellogg Foundation through the National Congress of American Indians. We extend special thanks to Sarah Hicks (National Congress of American Indians) for her guidance and support throughout the development of this report, to Delaine Alley and Ashley Cruse for invaluable research assistance, to the program administrators of the 34 HHS-approved tribal TANF programs for responding to the “Tribal TANF Administration Survey,” to Norm DeWeaver of the Indian and Native American Training Coalition for his contributions to and review of the document, and to the numerous tribal professionals, TANF program staff members, and other individuals who shared their expertise and experience with us and our colleagues at conferences and in dozens of conversations and interviews. Contacts For Further Information Dr. Eddie F. Brown, Director Kathryn M. Buder Center for American Indian Studies George Warren Brown School of Social Work, Washington University Campus Box 1196, One Brookings Drive St. Louis, MO 63130-4899 Tel: 314-935-4510 Email: [email protected] Dr. Stephen Cornell, Director Udall Center for Studies in Public Policy, The University of Arizona 803 East First Street Tucson, AZ 85719 Tel: 520-884-4393 Email: [email protected] Welfare, Work, and American Indians November 2001 Executive Summary The Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (PRWORA) ushered in a new era of welfare programs in America. PRWORA and related legislation specifically addressed the needs of American Indian tribes. In this report we review the key features of the welfare reform legislation as it applies to American Indians and Indian Country, assess—to the best of our ability with currently available information—its impact on Indian nations and its chances of achieving its goals, and identify key issues that demand attention if welfare reform is to succeed on Indian lands.
    [Show full text]
  • The Conservative Parliamentary Party the Conservative Parliamentary Party
    4 Philip Cowley and Mark Stuart The Conservative parliamentary party The Conservative parliamentary party Philip Cowley and Mark Stuart 1 When the Conservative Party gathered for its first party conference since the 1997 general election, they came to bury the parliamentary party, not to praise it. The preceding five years had seen the party lose its (long-enjoyed) reputation for unity, and the blame for this was laid largely at the feet of the party’s parliamentarians.2 As Peter Riddell noted in The Times, ‘speaker after speaker was loudly cheered whenever they criticised the parliamentary party and its divisions’.3 It was an argument with which both the outgoing and incoming Prime Ministers were in agreement. Just before the 1997 general election, John Major confessed to his biographer that ‘I love my party in the country, but I do not love my parliamentary party’; he was later to claim that ‘divided views – expressed without restraint – in the parliamentary party made our position impossible’.4 And in his first address to the massed ranks of the new parliamentary Labour Party after the election Tony Blair drew attention to the state of the Conservative Party: Look at the Tory Party. Pause. Reflect. Then vow never to emulate. Day after day, when in government they had MPs out there, behaving with the indiscipline and thoughtlessness that was reminiscent of us in the early 80s. Where are they now, those great rebels? His answer was simple: not in Parliament. ‘When the walls came crashing down beneath the tidal wave of change, there was no discrimination between those Tory MPs.
    [Show full text]
  • Sro.Sussex.Ac.Uk
    A University of Sussex PhD thesis Available online via Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/ This thesis is protected by copyright which belongs to the author. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Please visit Sussex Research Online for more information and further details ‘Campaigning in poetry, governing in prose?’ The development of Conservative Party immigration policy in government and in opposition since 1945 Rebecca Partos Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Politics University of Sussex September 2016 2 Statement I hereby declare that this thesis has not been and will not be, submitted in whole or in part to another University for the award of any other degree. Signature: 3 University of Sussex Rebecca Partos Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Politics ‘Campaigning in poetry, governing in prose?’ The development of Conservative Party immigration policy in government and in opposition since 1945 Summary This thesis seeks to explain the development of the British Conservative Party’s immigration policy from 1945 to 2015. It draws on Gamble’s contrasting of the ‘politics of power’ versus the ‘politics of support’ to consider the extent to which Conservative immigration policy is influenced by periods in government and periods in opposition.
    [Show full text]
  • Ministers' Speeches
    Ministers' speeches Documents in the Publications Archive are at least two years old. They do not necessarily reflect current DWP policies or procedures. Old Ministerial speeches after 2007 are on: UK Government Web Archive For Ministers’ speeches 2002-2006, email the title and reference number of the publication you need to: [email protected] Recent DWP ministers’ speeches are in: Ministers’ speeches 2006 Speeches by Lord Hunt Reference Number Lord Hunt defends new Age Discrimination Act Third Age 80063 Employment Network Speeches by John Hutton Reference Number Ending child poverty and transforming life chances: John 80103 Hutton speech to Fabian Society DWP City Strategies conference 80100 Scope disablism summit 2006 80096 NAPF annual conference London 80092 The Work Foundation pensions 80074 conference ILO 2006 Global Compact Policy 80071 Dialogue What will it take to end child 80069 poverty? Reviving the European economic 80112 reform agenda The state and the individual building a lasting pensions 80123 settlement Supporting families the role of 80126 welfare The active welfare state: matching 80128 rights with responsibilities Fabian women's network women 80137 and pensions Welfare reform 10 years on 10 80143 years ahead Welfare to work convention 2006 80149 CBI/Real Finance human capital 80160 awards Future services network 80161 ABI saver summit 80163 TUC disabilities conference 2006 80165 Child support redesign 80167 Pensions reform statement 80169 Speeches by Anne McGuire Reference Number Speech at the RNIB 'focus
    [Show full text]