DOCSLIB.ORG

Report Agenda Item 8 Leicestershire County Council Highways Forum for Harborough 26 May 2010

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Report Agenda Item 8 Leicestershire County Council Highways Forum for Harborough 26 May 2010 REPORT AGENDA ITEM 8 LEICESTERSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL HIGHWAYS FORUM FOR HARBOROUGH 26 TH MAY 2010 A47 - ROAD SAFETY REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENT & TRANSPORT Purpose of Report 1. To advise Members on the results of the road traffic accident analysis recently completed on the A47, through Harborough District. Background 2. The County Council took over responsibility for this former trunk road section of the A47 in October 2004. 3. In response to recent local concerns about road safety at several locations along the route, it was agreed that an analysis of road traffic accidents along the whole route (within Harborough District) should be undertaken; and the results presented to this meeting of the Highways Forum. 4. Fixed speed cameras were first introduced onto the A47 at the Billesdon crossroads in December 2002; mobile speed camera enforcement now takes place in all of the parishes, except Thurnby & Bushby. Route Description 5. The A47 in Harborough is 17.5 km in length, stretching between Leicester City and Rutland. It is predominantly a 7.3 m wide single carriageway rural road with sweeping bends and several steep inclines requiring climbing lanes to assist safe overtaking. Speed limits through the settlements of Thurnby, Bushby and Houghton on the Hill are 40 mph; it is 50 mph through Skeffington, Billesdon (the bypass) and Tugby. Elsewhere, the national speed limit applies. The route is generally unlit and without footways or kerbing. It carries approximately 9560 vehicles per day, of which 11% are heavy goods vehicles. A location plan can be found at Appendix A. Accident Details and Analysis Overall Position 6. Measured by the frequency of killed or seriously injured (KSI) accidents per kilometre over the last 5 calendar years for the A47 within Harborough District the record of accidents is just above the average for all rural A and B roads within Leicestershire. 1 E:\moderngov\data\published\Intranet\C00000709\M00002872\AI00025432\A47RoadSafety0.doc 7. Over this period there have been a total of 66 recorded injury accidents resulting in 5 deaths, 14 serious and 87 slight casualties. This equates, on average, to just over 1 accident per year per kilometre. Whilst between 2005 and 2008 accident numbers remained reasonably stable, averaging 15 per year, 2009 has seen a sharp drop to only 6 accidents. The following tables give a more detailed view of casualty severity and accident type. Casualties 2005 to 2009 Severity 2009 Average for Average for all Rural A47 (%) Roads in Leicestershire (%) Slight 5 82 85 Serious 0 13 12 Fatal 1 5 3 Accidents 2005 to 2009 Type 2009 Average for Average for all Rural A47 (%) Roads in Leicestershire (%) Single vehicle loss of control 2 30 30 Wet or slippery road 4 39 45 Motorcycles 3 14 11 Weekend accidents 4 42 26 Right turn accidents 2 18 17 Overtaking 1 20 9 8. The consideration of only one year’s accidents when looking to identify remedial measures is unreliable and the accident investigation upon which this report is based has therefore considered the full 5 years’ accident data. Accident Clusters 9. Accidents sometimes cluster around a particular feature in the highway such as a junction or a bend; when a number of such accidents share one or more basic characteristics, it is often possible to identify improvements which will, in all probability, lead to a measurable reduction in accidents. 2 E:\moderngov\data\published\Intranet\C00000709\M00002872\AI00025432\A47RoadSafety0.doc 10. The only such site along this route is the Station Road junction in Thurnby, which experienced 6 accidents between 2005 and 2007. However, in 2008, the existing signals were upgraded, kerb lines adjusted and pedestrian facilities improved. Since then there have been no further reported accidents. Whilst it may be too early to say that the accident problem has been solved, the recent improvement indicates there is currently no justification for any further changes. Other Accidents 11. Together, the lengths of road between Tilton Lane, Billesdon and the B6047 junction (3.5km) and between Skeffington Glebe Road and the Skeffington Lodge Farm access (1.5 km) have experienced 15 accidents with no accident clusters. However, a wet/damp road surface was recorded at 40% of the accidents compared to 45% for similar roads across the whole County. Whist this proportion is just below the average for all County roads, any further deterioration of the surface may be accompanied by an increase in accidents involving skidding. The planned surface dressing of these two sections of road in 2010/11 should address this potential problem. General Road Safety Concerns 12. Local people and their representatives have expressed more general road safety concerns. The following paragraphs set out general observations. 13. Skeffington has had a 50 mph speed limit since February 2001 and currently just over 85% of vehicles passing through the village adhere to the speed limit. Whilst in the last 5 years there have bee 5 reported accidents within the 50 mph limit, three of these involved unusual circumstances i.e. an animal in the road, temporary road works and an untreated icy road. Overall, therefore, there is no strong accident pattern that leads us to specific remedial works. 14. Within Skeffington, the Main Street junction is protected by vehicle activated signs that warn speeding drivers that they are exceeding the speed limit, or, if there is a vehicle in Main St. waiting to enter the A47, warn them of the side road. The last recorded personal injury accident at the junction was 1993, and significant improvements to visibility, road signs and markings have been introduced since then. 15. The hedge on the southern highway boundary south east of Main Street not only restricts visibility for vehicles waiting at the Main Street junction (and conversely those drivers approaching the junction from the east) but also requires caution from drivers entering the A47 from those properties east of the junction. Whilst the reduced forward visibility has not contributed to the 3 reported accidents around this bend, the hedge is not being adequately maintained and the Southern Area Highways Manager is requiring the adjacent landowner to cut it back. When completed, this work should significantly improve visibility and road safety for westbound traffic as well as those entering the A47. 3 E:\moderngov\data\published\Intranet\C00000709\M00002872\AI00025432\A47RoadSafety0.doc 16. Although road safety at the blind summit North West of the old Skeffington Mill site is a cause for local concern, overtaking at the summit is prohibited by a central hatched area incorporating continuous double white lines. There are no reported accidents at or just beyond the summit and consequently there is no justification for changes to the road. 17. There are several crawler lanes along this route where the central carriageway markings allow overtaking vehicles travelling downhill to enter the opposing carriageway by crossing the broken centre line marking. Whilst downhill overtaking is a feature of only a small number of recent injury accidents, it is proposed to take advantage of the planned surface dressing work and change the markings to make this manoeuvre illegal, hence improving road safety still further. Traffic Speeds and Speed Limits 18. When considering the appropriateness of existing speed limits national guidance requires the road geometry (i.e. number of bends and junctions), to be looked at together with mean vehicle speeds, accident rates and traffic volumes. An assessment of the available data indicates that all of the existing speed limits should remain unchanged. However, some of the speed and traffic volume data are several years’ old; additional data is being collected as part of the County-wide speed limit assessment programme. A final formal assessment will be undertaken once this new data is available. Existing 85%ile speeds and matching speed limits are given below. Existing 85 % Section/Location speed Speed limit Leicester City Bushby 40 39 Bushby to Houghton on the Hill * 60 56 Houghton on the Hill 40 46 Houghton on the Hill to Billesdon * 60 60 Billesdon 50 50 Billesdon to Skeffington * 60 61 Skeffington 50 49 Skeffington to Tugby * 60 59 Tugby 50 52 Tugby to County Boundary * 60 62 Rutland *These lengths of road are subject to the national speed limit (60 mph for cars which form the majority of the traffic). 4 E:\moderngov\data\published\Intranet\C00000709\M00002872\AI00025432\A47RoadSafety0.doc 19. Whilst the measured speeds at Houghton on the Hill are at the police enforcement threshold, the village has speed limit vehicle activated signs on each approach and is within a speed camera site. Subject to the outcome of the formal speed limit assessment, a review of the existing signs and enforcement arrangements clearly needs to be undertaken. Other Recommended or Planned Works 20. Whilst the following works are not directly targeting accident reduction, they should nevertheless help drivers to safely negotiate their way along this busy route. • It is recommended that the signing on both approaches to the B6047 crossroads should be rationalised by the removal of some redundant signs and the repositioning of others to make them more visible. • In consultation with the parish council, footway improvements are being considered for the Main Street junction in Houghton on the Hill, adjacent to the service station. • Central hatching, within the existing markings in the centre of the road, are to be added within Thurnby & Bushby, where the remaining road markings are to be refreshed. Conclusion 21. Whilst the detailed accident investigation has not identified any serious accident problems along this route, there are various minor matters that, in the interests of road safety, do require some attention. Appropriate improvements will be completed during the current financial year.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A47/A141 Guyhirn Junction Project Update Winter 2020
    A47/A141 Guyhirn junction Project update winter 2020 Investing in the A47 The A47 is an important connection, linking the cities of Norwich and Peterborough, the towns of Wisbech, Kings Lynn, Dereham, Great Yarmouth and Lowestoft and a succession of villages in what is largely a rural area. As part of a multi-billion investment to improve journeys on England’s major A-roads and motorways, the Government is funding a package of six projects on the 115-mile stretch of the A47 between Peterborough and Great Yarmouth. Together the projects will convert almost eight miles of single carriageway into dual carriageway and improve key junctions along the A47 road. The A47 road improvement projects are: n A47/A141 Guyhirn junction n A47 Wansford to Sutton dualling n A47 North Tuddenham to Easton dualling n A47/A11 Thickthorn junction n A47 Blofield to North Burlingham dualling n A47 Great Yarmouth junction About the A47/A141 Guyhirn junction project Project benefits A47 We’ll be making changes to the Guyhirn junction between the A47 (Fen Our improvements to the junction will: Road to South Brink) and the A141 (March Road) which is used by over B1187 GuyhirnGuyhirn 20,000 vehicles a day and experiences high levels of congestion. The n reduce delays and queuing traffic by increasing the size of the Guyhirn South Brink changes to the junction aim to reduce congestion, improve journey times roundabout Gull Road High Road and increase safety. n improve safety by increasing visibility for drivers when they enter the roundabout Following our Preferred Route Announcement (PRA) in 2017, we undertook n improve pedestrian crossings and footpaths, particularly between Proposed traffic light R i v e r N e n e controlled crossing a variety of technical and traffic surveys to help us finalise our design for the March Road, Guyhirn village and local amenities New enlarged roundabout project.
    [Show full text]
  • Skeffington Parish Walks
    Skeffington This leaflet is one of a series produced to promote circular walking throughout the county. You can obtain Skeffington others in the series by visiting your local library, Tourist Information Centre or download them from www.leics.gov.uk/paths. circular 2 walks Bottesford 1 3½kms/2¼ miles Muston Redmile 2 8½kms/5¼ miles Wymeswold Scalford Hathern Burton on the Wolds Thorpe Acre & Prestwold Asfordby Barrow upon Soar Frisby Rearsby Normanton le Heath Barkby Ibstock Twyford Appleby Swepstone Anstey Hungarton Magna Groby Tilton & Lowesby 4 Carlton Ratby Keyham Skeffington, Desford Rolleston & Tugby 4 The path is well Thurnby l Burton Overy Wistow Hallaton marked and soon bears right Narborough through two gates about 100m apart. Medbourne Burbage Kibworth Cross the fields, to a narrow bridge on & Smeeton Westerby Laughton the left. Then follow the waymarkers Ullesthorpe Lubenham uphill to eventually reach Tugby along a surfaced path passing to the right of the three houses ahead. l5 Walk up Main Street into the village, then turn left The routes are clearly marked with bold, yellow It is advisable to wear suitable footwear when walking. into Chapel Lane. Note the Fox and Hounds public topped waymarker posts and waymarker discs Stout shoes or walking boots are recommended. house is just up on the right. Continue up the path with the Parish Walks symbol. Some stretches of the route follow minor country roads. Beware to the right, passing “Meadowcroft” on the right, then of traffic approaching from both directions. If possible stay on the through a small metal gate and onto a narrow path.
    [Show full text]
  • A Short Guide to Providing and Managing Sites for Gypsies and Travellers
    Places we’re proud of A short guide to providing and managing sites for Gypsies and Travellers January 2021 2 / Places we’re proud of About this guide This short guide shares some key lessons and strong examples to prompt more housing associations and local authorities to get involved in providing good- quality sites for Gypsies and Travellers. It’s produced by the National Policy Advisory Panel on Gypsy and Traveller Housing, which is a group of housing providers committed to extending provision and raising standards of this much-needed type of accommodation. The guide is based on research funded by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, undertaken by De Montfort University in Leicester and published by the Chartered Institute of Housing in 2016.1 This showed how vital it is for existing sites to be well managed, before seeking political and public support for plans to build new sites. The 2016 study identified a list of essential ingredients for effective site delivery and management, which this guide amplifies and illustrates with successful case studies from across the UK. Foreword I am delighted to be able to welcome this guide to providing and managing Gypsy and Traveller sites, produced by the National Policy Advisory Panel on Gypsy and Traveller Housing. It is welcome to see housing providers driving debate on Gypsy and Traveller accommodation. There are excellent examples of housing associations and local authorities working together to provide and manage sites in their areas. Baroness Cathy Bakewell Their message is that housing providers can and should include Vice-Chair of the All Party Gypsy and Traveller sites in their plans for developing new Parliamentary Group on housing.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Flood Risk Assessment
    Greater Norwich Area Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Final Report: Level 1 November 2017 This page has intentionally been left blank 2017s5962 Greater Norwich Area SFRA Final v2.0.docx JBA Project Manager Claire Gardner The Library St Philips Courtyard Church Hill COLESHILL Warwickshire B46 3AD Revision History Revision Ref / Date Issued Amendments Issued to Draft rev 1.0 / June 2017 DRAFT for comment SFRA Steering Group Final Draft rev 2.0 / August 2017 Final DRAFT for comment SFRA Steering Group Final rev 1.0 / October 2017 Final report SFRA Steering Group Final rev 2.0 / November 2017 Final Report – updated with SFRA Steering Group minor text amendments Contract This report describes work commissioned on behalf of a consortium of local planning authorities in Norfolk: • Broadland District Council • Great Yarmouth Borough Council • Borough Council of King’s Lynn and West Norfolk • Norwich City Council • North Norfolk District Council • South Norfolk Council • Broads Authority Each authority was represented as part of a steering group for the SFRA. The steering group’s representative for the contract was North Norfolk’s Policy Team Leader, Iain Withington. Sophie Dusting, Freyja Scarborough and Ffion Wilson of JBA Consulting carried out this work. Prepared by .................................................. Sophie Dusting BSc MEPS Analyst ....................................................................... Ffion Wilson BSc MSc Analyst ....................................................................... Freyja Scarborough BSc MSc Assistant Analyst Reviewed by ................................................. Claire Gardner BSc MSc MCIWEM C.WEM Chartered Senior Analyst ....................................................................... Philip Bennett-Lloyd BSc DipMgmt CMLI MCIEEM MCIWEM C.WEM C.Env Technical Director 2017s5962 Greater Norwich Area SFRA Final v2.0.docx Purpose This document has been prepared as a Final Report for the Greater Norwich Partnership.
    [Show full text]
  • FINAL SA Appendix E Residential Site Proformas
    Appendix E - Housing Site Proformas Summary .............................................................................................................................. 2 Blaby ..................................................................................................................................... 6 Cosby ................................................................................................................................. 24 Countesthorpe .................................................................................................................... 39 Croft .................................................................................................................................... 72 Elmesthorpe ........................................................................................................................ 78 Enderby .............................................................................................................................. 87 Glenfield............................................................................................................................ 102 Glen Parva ........................................................................................................................ 111 Huncote ............................................................................................................................ 117 Kilby .................................................................................................................................. 126 Kirby
    [Show full text]
  • Free Entrance ONE WEEKEND OVER 400 PROPERTIES and EVENTS
    Free Entrance ONE WEEKEND OVER 400 PROPERTIES AND EVENTS SATURDAY 13 & SUNDAY 14 SEPTEMBER www.discovernorthernireland.com/ehod EHOD 2014 Message from the Minister Welcome to European Heritage Open Days (EHOD) 2014 This year European Heritage Open Days will take place on the 13th Finally, I wish to use this opportunity to thank all and 14th September. Over 400 properties and events are opening of the owners and guardians of the properties who open their doors, and to the volunteers during the weekend FREE OF CHARGE. Not all of the events are in who give up their time to lead tours and host the brochure so for the widest choice and updates please visit our FREE events. Without your enthusiasm and website www.discovernorthernireland.com/ehod.aspx generosity this weekend event would not be possible. I am extremely grateful to all of you. In Europe, heritage and in particular cultural Once again EHOD will be merging cultural I hope that you have a great weekend. heritage is receiving new emphasis as a heritage with built heritage, to broaden our ‘strategic resource for a sustainable Europe’ 1. Our understanding of how our intangible heritage Mark H Durkan own local heritage, in all its expressions – built has shaped and influenced our historic Minister of the Environment and cultural – is part of us, and part of both the environment. This year, as well as many Arts appeal and the sustainable future of this part of and Culture events (p21), we have new Ireland and these islands. It is key to our partnerships with Craft NI (p7), and Food NI experience and identity, and key to sharing our (p16 & 17).
    [Show full text]
  • Community Infrastructure Fund Cif 2 Postwick Hub Full
    Community Infrastructure Funding CIF 2 Postwick Hub Full Business Case COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE FUND CIF 2 POSTWICK HUB FULL BUSINESS CASE NORFOLK COUNTY COUNCIL OCTOBER 2008 CONTENTS Project Summary Information 1 Overview 1 Project Plan 2 Promoter Information 3 NATA Appraisal Summary Table 5 1 Scheme Description 1-1 1.1 Background 1-2 1.2 Postwick Hub - Preferred Scheme 1-3 2 Strategic Case 2-1 2.1 Background information 2-1 2.2 Scheme objectives 2-8 2.3 Scheme history and development 2-9 2.4 Strategic Fit 2-12 3 Value for Money Case 3-1 3.1 Introduction 3-1 3.2 Capital Costs 3-1 3.3 Operating Costs 3-3 3.4 Cost Benefit Analysis 3-4 3.5 New Approach to Appraisal Assessment 3-1 3.6 NATA Supporting Analyses 3-30 4 Delivery Case 4-34 4.1 Strategic Project Governance 4-34 4.2 Project Delivery and Staffing 4-37 4.3 Project Programme 4-39 4.4 Park & Ride 4-40 4.5 Risk Management 4-41 4.6 Stakeholder and Community Engagement 4-41 5 Commercial Case 5-1 5.1 Preferred procurement route 5-1 5.2 Risk share 5-5 5.3 Contract monitoring 5-6 i 5.4 Council’s experience 5-6 6 Financial Case 6-1 6.1 Detailed cost breakdowns 6-1 6.2 Independent verification of costs 6-4 6.3 Inflation 6-4 6.4 Quantified Risk Assessment 6-5 6.5 Optimism Bias 6-5 6.6 Funding 6-5 6.7 Summary of Funding Package 6-6 6.8 Revenue Funding 6-6 LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix 1A Figure 1.1 Appendix 2A Figure 2.1 Appendix 3A Modelling Appendix 3B Environment Worksheets Appendix 3C Safety Worksheets Appendix 3D Economy Worksheets Appendix 3E Accessibility Worksheets Appendix 3F Integration
    [Show full text]
  • Road Investment Strategy East Area 6 Scheme Assessment Report A47
    Road Investment Strategy East Area 6 Scheme Assessment Report A47 Guyhirn Junction (A47IMPS2-AMY-GJ-ZZ-DO-L-0006) Date: 23 February 2018 Version: 1.4 [Type here] [Type here] [Type here] Document Control Document Title Scheme Assessment Report – A47 Guyhirn Junction Author Jon Brittain / Dan Hunt / Andrew Warwick / Raymond Logan Owner Aaron Douglas – Highways England Distribution Highways England Document Status Consultee comment Revision History Version Date Description Author 0.1 09/06/17 First Draft for Interim SGAR Jon Brittain 1.0 13/10/17 Draft of Stage 1 info for initial Jon Brittain comment 1.1 01/12/17 Draft of complete product Jon Brittain 1.2 13/12/17 Updated DRAFT for Consultee Jon Brittain comment 1.3 22/01/18 Updated DRAFT following Jon Brittain Consultee comment 1.4 23/02/18 HE Project Management review Lizzie Cooper Reviewer List Name Role Andy Heap A47 Project Director (Amey) Aaron Douglas Highways England Project Manager Paul Carey A47 Programme Manager (Amey) Guy Lewis Senior Responsible Owner (HE) Peter Grant S&P Transport Planning Group (HE) Jose Garvi Serrano SES Environment (HE) Mark Howes SES Safer Roads Group (HE) Raymond Logan Transportation Lead (Amey) Andrew Warwick Environmental Lead (Amey) Dan Hunt Engineering Lead (Amey) Approvals Name Signature Title Date of Version Issue Peter Havlicek P M Havlicek Programme Lead (HE) 18 April 1.4 2019 The original format of this document is copyright to Highways England [Type here] [Type here] [Type here] Table of Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 15 1.1 Background ........................................................................................................................... 15 1.2 Project Control Framework ................................................................................................... 16 1.3 The identified problem ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Swan Inn 3 Dereham Road, Mattishall, Dereham, Norfolk NR20 3QB
    File Ref: E-615561b Swan Inn 3 Dereham Road, Mattishall, Dereham, Norfolk NR20 3QB Tenure Open plan ground floor trade areas Leasehold Lounge bar and dining areas (40) 3 bedroom owner's accom Price Trade division 60% bar, 40% food £38,500 T/O £231,364 ex VAT Y/E 31.3.2018 Simon Jackaman Divisional Director 01223 402600 [email protected] SOLE SELLING RIGHTS Swan Inn 3 Dereham Road, Mattishall, Dereham, Norfolk NR20 3QB File Ref: E-615561b Google © Copyright (2019). All rights reserved. Location The Swan Inn is prominently situated in the centre of Mattishall directly opposite the village Church of All Saints. The village of Mattishall is located in the heart of Norfolk approximately 11 miles west of Norwich and 4 miles east of Dereham. The main A47 road which connects Norwich to King's Lynn via Dereham is close by and provides access to the north Norfolk coast, making the village very accessible. Description A two-storey detached property, pre-war built of brick construction under a pitched tiled roof, with single storey additions to the side and rear, which enhance the public areas. Google © Copyright (2019). All rights reserved. Swan Inn 3 Dereham Road, Mattishall, Dereham, Norfolk NR20 3QB File Ref: E-615561b Trade The business is very much the hub of the local community and regularly holds quiz and bingo evenings. The current owners have operated the business for just over 4 years, during which time they have carried out a number The Swan Inn is ideally suited to an owner operator seeking of refurbishments and improvements to the trading and to build upon the increasing established trade developed by private living accommodation.
    [Show full text]
  • Sessional Diary 2005–06
    HOUSE OF COMMONS SESSIONAL DIARY 2005–06 11 May 2005 to 8 November 2006 Prepared in the Journal Office of the House of Commons INTRODUCTION 1. This diary records the business on which the House spent its time in Session 2005–06, analysed into categories, and similar information for sittings in Westminster Hall. It is intended mainly to provide information in response to statistical inquiries, and in using it the following points should be borne in mind: (a) The diary does not include business which took little or no time, such as presentations of bills, unopposed private business, and motions agreed to without debate or division. (b) Divisions are normally included with the business to which they relate. (c) Timings are taken from the Official Report, using the printed times where available, and otherwise taking a column of debate to last three minutes. Daily prayers are assumed to last a standard five minutes (and are not itemised in the analysis), and the time at which the House rose is taken from the Votes and Proceedings. (d) Periods of suspension are included in the total sitting time, and are listed in section 14h of the analysis (Miscellaneous). However, the 2½-hour suspension from 11.30 to 14.00 in Westminster Hall on most Tuesdays and Wednesdays (introduced on 1 January 2003) is shown in brackets in the “Duration” column and is left out of the totals. Other suspensions in Westminster Hall are included in the totals and in the analysis under section 5. (e) The times in the column headed “After appointed time” refer to business taken after the time appointed as the “moment of interruption”.
    [Show full text]
  • Road Investment Strategy East Area 6 A47 / A11 Thickthorn Junction Improvements PCF Stage 2 Scheme Assessment Report (SAR) HE551
    Road Investment Strategy East Area 6 A47 / A11 Thickthorn Junction Improvements PCF Stage 2 Scheme Assessment Report (SAR) HE551492-ACM-GEN-TJ-RP-ZM-00006 Date: 16 January 2018 Version: 4.0 1 This page is intentionally left blank 2 Document Control Document Title Scheme Assessment Report (SAR) – HE551492-ACM-GEN-TJ-RP-ZM-00006 Author Kevin Mitchell / Oluwatobi Owoiya/Fay Lagan/John Alderman/Constantinos Rontogiannis Owner Romeu Rosa Distribution See Reviewers List Document Status For Stage Approval Revision History Version Date Description Author 1.0 30th June 2017 For Stage Approval Kevin Mitchell 2.0 8th December 2017 For Stage Approval (core growth Oluwatobi Owoiya/Fay only – Traffic) Lagan/John Alderman 3.0 21st December 2017 For Stage Approval (including high- Oluwatobi Owoiya/Fay low growth summary) Lagan/Mark Chadwick 4.0 16th January 2018 For Stage Approval (all final Constantinos comments) Rontogiannis/Brendan Kemp Reviewer List Name Role Romeu Rosa Intergrated Project Team Peter Grant Transport Planning Group (TPG) Jose Garvi Serrano SES Environment Team Mark Howes SES Safer Roads Group Approvals Name Signature Title Date of Version Issue Guy Lewis Programme Lead (PL) 25/01/18 1 The original format of this document is copyright to the Highways England 3 Limitations AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited (“AECOM”) has prepared this Report for Highways England (“Client”) in accordance with the Agreement under which our services were performed in the Collaborative Delivery Framework (Consultancy) 2016-2017, Roads Investment Strategy Schemes A47/A12 Corridor, Project Control Framework Stage 2 commission. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional advice included in this Report or any other services provided by AECOM.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Committee Papers
    Planning Committee Agenda 05 March 2021 10.00am This is a remote meeting held under the Broads Authority’s Standing Orders on Procedure Rules for Remote Meetings. Participants: You will be sent a link to join the meeting. The room will open at 9.00am and we request that you log in by 9.30am to allow us to check connections and other technical details. Members of the public: We will publish a live stream link two days before the meeting at Planning Committee - 5 March 2021 (broads-authority.gov.uk). The live stream will be suspended for any exempt items on the agenda. Please email committees@broads- authority.gov.uk with any queries about this meeting. Introduction 1. To receive apologies for absence 2. To receive declarations of interest 3. To receive and confirm the minutes of the Planning Committee meeting held on 5 February 2021 (Pages 3-13) 4. Points of information arising from the minutes 5. To note whether any items have been proposed as matters of urgent business Matters for decision 6. Chairman’s announcements and introduction to public speaking Please note that public speaking is in operation in accordance with the Authority’s Code of Conduct for Planning Committee and the new Government regulations and standing orders agreed by the Authority. 7. Request to defer applications include in this agenda and/or vary the order of the agenda 8. To consider applications for planning permission including matters for consideration of enforcement of planning control: 8.1. BA/2021/0028/FUL – Whitlingham Country Park: construction of toilet block (Pages 14- 20) Planning Committee, 05 March 2021 1 Enforcement 9.
    [Show full text]