Sessional Diary 2005–06

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sessional Diary 2005–06 HOUSE OF COMMONS SESSIONAL DIARY 2005–06 11 May 2005 to 8 November 2006 Prepared in the Journal Office of the House of Commons INTRODUCTION 1. This diary records the business on which the House spent its time in Session 2005–06, analysed into categories, and similar information for sittings in Westminster Hall. It is intended mainly to provide information in response to statistical inquiries, and in using it the following points should be borne in mind: (a) The diary does not include business which took little or no time, such as presentations of bills, unopposed private business, and motions agreed to without debate or division. (b) Divisions are normally included with the business to which they relate. (c) Timings are taken from the Official Report, using the printed times where available, and otherwise taking a column of debate to last three minutes. Daily prayers are assumed to last a standard five minutes (and are not itemised in the analysis), and the time at which the House rose is taken from the Votes and Proceedings. (d) Periods of suspension are included in the total sitting time, and are listed in section 14h of the analysis (Miscellaneous). However, the 2½-hour suspension from 11.30 to 14.00 in Westminster Hall on most Tuesdays and Wednesdays (introduced on 1 January 2003) is shown in brackets in the “Duration” column and is left out of the totals. Other suspensions in Westminster Hall are included in the totals and in the analysis under section 5. (e) The times in the column headed “After appointed time” refer to business taken after the time appointed as the “moment of interruption”. In Session 2005–06, these times were as follows: Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday 2200 2200 *1900 1800 1430 * 2200 on the day of the State Opening of Parliament and immediately following a periodic adjournment. (f) All times are in hours and minutes, using the 24-hour clock. 2. A Sessional Diary has been kept in the Journal Office for most sessions since 1906, although in the early years times were kept only to the nearest quarter hour. An analysis substantially in the current form begins in the 1960s. The totals from the analysis have been reproduced in the Sessional Information Digest since 1984–85 and in the House’s Sessional Returns since 1987–88. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS AND TOTALS Part Contents Duration After Page appoin- ted time I Diary for House 1 II Analysis for House 1527.07 118.05 79 1. Addresses other than Prayers 40.48 1.00 79 2. Government bills 631.27 22.32 a Second readings: committed to standing 187.28 2.24 79 committee b Second readings: committal to Committee of 50.53 1.28 81 whole House (wholly or partly) c Second readings: no committal (Consolidation — — bills) d Committee of the whole House 77.18 2.46 81 e Consideration 199.51 4.37 82 f Third reading 34.53 2.26 83 g Lords amendments 70.29 5.41 84 h Allocation of time motions 7.29 2.31 85 i Committal and carry-over motions 3.06 0.39 86 3. Private Members’ bills 58.02 0.21 a Second readings (and all stages) 40.52 0.18 86 b Later stages 17.10 0.03 87 4. Private bills at time for opposed private business — — 5. Government motions 42.17 1.43 a European Union documents 8.05 0.45 87 b Business motions 1.15 — 87 c General 32.57 0.58 87 6. Opposition business 129.58 6.32 a Opposition days 129.58 6.32 88 b Opposition motions in Government time — — 7. Private Members’ motions 22.19 3.03 a Substantive motions 7.29 3.03 89 b Ten-minute rule motions 14.50 — 89 8. Adjournment motions 283.13 72.26 a Government 103.00 1.19 91 b Recess 25.05 0.42 92 c S.O. No. 24 debates 3.16 — 92 d Daily 107.02 70.25 92 9. Estimates 15.42 0.03 96 iii Part Contents Duration After Page appoin- ted time 10. Money Resolutions 0.54 0.14 97 11. Ways and Means 22.27 1.03 97 12. Affirmative Statutory Instruments 18.09 1.04 97 13. Negative Statutory Instruments — — 14. Business when no Question before House 334.41 8.04 a Questions 176.42 — 98 b Urgent Questions 7.34 — 102 c Statements 81.39 0.54 103 d Business Statements 38.25 — 106 e S.O. No. 24 Applications 0.11 — 107 f Points of order 7.07 0.28 107 g Public petitions 4.44 3.30 118 h Miscellaneous 18.19 3.12 121 15. Daily prayers 17.00 123 III Diary for Westminster Hall 123 IV Analysis for Westminster Hall 532.11 — 1. Private Members’ Adjournment Debates 398.39 — 150 2. Government Adjournment Debates 44.45 — 159 3. Liaison Committee Adjournment Debates 65.40 — 160 4. Questions — — 5. Miscellaneous 23.07 — 161 iv PART I: DIARY FOR HOUSE 1 PART I: DIARY FOR HOUSE Time Subject Duration After appoin- ted time 1. Wednesday 11th May 2005 14.30 Message to attend the Lords Commissioners; Suspension 0.16 14.46 Election of a Speaker 0.33 15.19 House rose [Totals for session: 0.49; 0.00] 0.49 0.00 2. Thursday 12th May 2005 11.00 Message to attend the Lords Commissioners; Suspension; Approbation of 1.59 Speaker; Speaker’s statement; Members taking the oath 12.59 Suspension 1.01 14.00 Members taking the oath 1.08 15.08 Suspension 0.22 15.30 Members taking the oath 0.33 16.03 House rose [Totals for session: 5.52; 0.00] 5.03 0.00 3. Monday 16th May 2005 14.30 Prayers 0.05 14.35 Members taking the oath 0.58 15.33 Suspension 0.57 16.30 Members taking the oath 0.36 17.06 House rose [Totals for session: 8.28; 0.00] 2.36 0.00 4. Tuesday 17th May 2005 11.25 Prayers 0.05 11.30 Message from the Queen; Suspension 3.00 14.30 Members taking the oath 0.08 14.38 Miscellaneous: Speaker’s Statement [duties and responsibilities of Members] 0.06 14.44 General Government Motion: Sessional Orders [Metropolitan Police] 0.02 14.46 Address [1st day] 7.06 21.52 Adjournment: Mr David Amess: Census 2001 (Southend) 0.36 0.28 22.28 House rose [Totals for session: 19.31; 0.28] 11.03 0.28 5. Wednesday 18th May 2005 11.30 Prayers 0.05 11.35 Members taking the oath 0.01 11.36 Point of Order: Mr Eric Forth: availability of information to Members of the 0.13 House. 11.49 Address [2nd day] 6.26 18.15 Adjournment: Bob Russell: Wild Flowers 0.34 18.49 House rose [Totals for session: 26.50; 0.28] 7.19 0.00 2 SESSIONAL DIARY, 2005–06 Time Subject Duration After appoin- ted time 6. Thursday 19th May 2005 10.30 Prayers 0.05 10.35 Business Statement 0.25 11.00 Point of Order: Mr Patrick McLoughlin: asking whether the annunciator 0.01 monitors were working in all parts of the estate. 11.01 Members taking the oath 0.09 11.10 Address [3rd day] 6.49 17.59 Adjournment: Mr Graham Allen: Travellers 0.30 0.29 18.29 House rose [Totals for session: 34.49; 0.57] 7.59 0.29 7. Monday 23rd May 2005 14.30 Prayers 0.05 14.35 Members taking the oath 0.03 14.38 Questions: Home Department 0.53 15.31 Points of Order: Miss Anne McIntosh: seeking advice on asking questions of the 0.03 Advocate-General for Scotland. Miss Julie Kirkbride: wanting advice as to how she can ensure a report into the collapse of MG Rover is published by the Government. 15.34 Address [4th day] 6.24 21.58 Adjournment: David Taylor: School Meals 0.32 0.30 22.30 House rose [Totals for session: 42.49; 1.27] 8.00 0.30 8. Tuesday 24th May 2005 14.30 Prayers 0.05 14.35 Members taking the oath 0.03 14.38 Questions: Transport (45); Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster (10) 0.56 15.34 Member taking the oath 0.01 15.35 Address [5th day] [Division] 6.42 0.17 22.17 Affirmative Statutory Instruments: Draft Tax Information Exchange 0.25 0.25 Agreement (Taxes on Income) (Aruba) Order 2005; Draft Tax Information Exchange Agreement (Taxes on Income) (Netherlands Antilles) Order 2005; Draft Tax Information Exchange Agreement (Taxes on Income) (Virgin Islands) Order 2005; Draft Tax Information Exchange Agreement (Taxes on Income) (Montserrat) Order 2005. 22.42 Adjournment: Miss Ann Widdecombe: Russell Clamp 0.25 0.25 23.07 House rose [Totals for session: 51.26; 2.34] 8.37 1.07 PART I: DIARY FOR HOUSE 3 Time Subject Duration After appoin- ted time 9. Wednesday 25th May 2005 11.30 Prayers 0.05 11.35 Questions: International Development (27); Prime Minister (28) 0.55 12.30 Points of Order: Pete Wishart: asking why an amendment had not appeared on 0.07 the Order Paper. Mr Barry Sheerman: wanting the Speaker to comment on the conduct of some Members. Mrs Caroline Spelman; Simon Hughes: expressing concern that Ministers had made announcements in the press before making statements in the House. Mr Michael Fabricant: complaining that the amplification system in the Chamber was not working. 12.37 Address [6th Day] [Divisions] 7.06 0.43 19.43 Ways and Means: Budget Resolutions 0.01 0.01 19.44 Adjournment: Keith Vaz: European Union 0.30 0.30 20.14 House rose [Totals for session: 60.10; 3.48] 8.44 1.14 10.
Recommended publications
  • Global Security: Non–Proliferation
    House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee Global Security: Non–Proliferation Fourth Report of Session 2008–09 Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 3 June 2009 HC 222 [Incorporating HC 1176-i,ii,iii, Session 2007–08] Published on 14 June 2009 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Foreign Affairs Committee The Foreign Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office and its associated agencies. Current membership Mike Gapes (Labour, Ilford South), Chairman Rt Hon Sir Menzies Campbell (Liberal Democrat, North East Fife) Mr Fabian Hamilton (Labour, Leeds North East) Rt Hon Mr David Heathcoat-Amory (Conservative, Wells) Mr John Horam (Conservative, Orpington) Mr Eric Illsley (Labour, Barnsley Central) Mr Paul Keetch (Liberal Democrat, Hereford) Andrew Mackinlay (Labour, Thurrock) Mr Malcolm Moss (Conservative, North East Cambridgeshire) Sandra Osborne (Labour, Ayr, Carrick and Cumnock) Mr Greg Pope (Labour, Hyndburn) Mr Ken Purchase (Labour, Wolverhampton North East) Rt Hon Sir John Stanley (Conservative, Tonbridge and Malling) Ms Gisela Stuart (Labour, Birmingham Edgbaston) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the Internet at www.parliament.uk/parliamentary_committees/foreign_affairs_committee.cfm.
    [Show full text]
  • Interpreting Parliamentary Scrutiny
    Interpreting Parliamentary Scrutiny An enquiry concerning everyday practices of parliamentary actors in select committees of the House of Commons Marc Geddes A dissertation submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Politics Faculty of Social Sciences The University of Sheffield May 2016 Contents Abstract v Acknowledgements vi List of tables and figures viii Introduction 1 Part I: Theoretical Foundations Chapter 1: Traditions 9 Chapter 2: Theory 35 Chapter 3: Methodology 58 Part II: Interpreting Scrutiny Chapter 4: Members 81 Chapter 5: Chairs 111 Chapter 6: Staff 137 Part III: Scrutiny Landscapes Chapter 7: Relationships 165 Chapter 8: Evidence 194 Chapter 9: Conclusions 223 iii Notes Appendix A: List of select committees 245 Appendix B: Ethics agreement 247 Appendix C: House of Commons confidentiality agreement 249 Appendix D: Standard interview consent form 251 Appendix E: Interview themes and checklist 253 Appendix F: Summary statistics for committee members 255 Appendix G: Summary data for witnesses 257 Appendix H: Summary of witness database categories 259 Bibliography 261 iv Abstract This doctorate looks at the role of parliamentary select committees in the UK House of Commons. Though the literature on this topic is extensive, this research project explores the issue from a distinctive vantage point. While research on committees has predominantly focused on their outputs, such as committee reports, in order to assess the effectiveness of Parliament in holding the executive to account, this thesis looks at the input-side to committee work. It explores the individual beliefs, everyday practices and perennial dilemmas of parliamentary actors in select committees. In doing so, this thesis argues that understanding beliefs and practices of committee members, chairs and staff are crucial ways to better comprehend the way that scrutiny works in the House of Commons.
    [Show full text]
  • JEW HATRED Anti-Semitism in Emulate the Growth and Influence of Its European Counterparts
    CJM OWALJUSIKWHS JEW HATRED Anti-Semitism in emulate the growth and influence of its European counterparts. Groups such as Britain Today the British National Party are scorned by the vast majority of Britons and are Anti-Semitism is, in many ways, the relatively powerless in the mainstream precursor of the racist attitudes now political process. projected by European societies on the The Far Right's influence, however, visible ethnic minorities within their on racial and political tension and midst. Jews remain the primary, violence, is manifest in localised areas of ideological, target for hard-core racists, power across the country. Racial attacks but the vast bulk of societal racism, in Tower Hamlets increased by over prejudice and actual physical attacks are 300% following the BNP's Millwall Edmonton Cemetery April 1990 directed against visible minority groups council seat election success in of Afro-Caribbean, India sub-continent, September '93. The Millwall victory (Nov '92); and the initial Allied air strikes or North African origin. This is confirmed (since overturned in the May '94 local against Iraq (Jan '91). by a number of recent opinion polls elections) gave an unprecedented boost The next highest increase followed conducted throughout Europe and Britain to the BNP's morale and public profile. the highly publicised desecration of the by the American Jewish Committee in Jewish cemetery in Carpentras, France which Jews were consistently viewed Anti-Semitic Incidents and Attacks (May '90). This is an indicator of the more favourably than other minority Anglo-Jewry's representative body, the influence of publicity on racist attacks, a groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Governing the Future
    House of Commons Public Administration Select Committee Governing the Future Second Report of Session 2006–07 Volume I Report, together with formal minutes Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 22 February 2007 HC 123-I Published on 6 March 2007 [Incorporating HC 756-i-v, Session 2005-06] by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Public Administration Select Committee The Public Administration Select Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the reports of the Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration, of the Health Service Commissioners for England, Scotland and Wales and of the Parliamentary Ombudsman for Northern Ireland, which are laid before this House, and matters in connection therewith and to consider matters relating to the quality and standards of administration provided by civil service departments, and other matters relating to the civil service. Current membership Dr Tony Wright MP (Labour, Cannock Chase) (Chairman) Mr David Burrowes MP (Conservative, Enfield Southgate) Paul Flynn MP (Labour, Newport West) Mr Ian Liddell-Grainger MP (Conservative, Bridgewater) David Heyes MP (Labour, Ashton under Lyne) Kelvin Hopkins MP (Labour, Luton North) Julie Morgan MP (Labour, Cardiff North) Mr Gordon Prentice MP (Labour, Pendle) Paul Rowen MP (Liberal Democrats, Rochdale) Grant Shapps MP (Conservative, Welwyn Hatfield) Jenny Willott MP (Liberal Democrats, Cardiff Central) The following Member was also a member of the Committee for part of this inquiry: Julia Goldsworthy MP (Liberal Democrats, Falmouth and Cambourne) Powers The Committee is one of the select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 146.
    [Show full text]
  • A47/A141 Guyhirn Junction Project Update Winter 2020
    A47/A141 Guyhirn junction Project update winter 2020 Investing in the A47 The A47 is an important connection, linking the cities of Norwich and Peterborough, the towns of Wisbech, Kings Lynn, Dereham, Great Yarmouth and Lowestoft and a succession of villages in what is largely a rural area. As part of a multi-billion investment to improve journeys on England’s major A-roads and motorways, the Government is funding a package of six projects on the 115-mile stretch of the A47 between Peterborough and Great Yarmouth. Together the projects will convert almost eight miles of single carriageway into dual carriageway and improve key junctions along the A47 road. The A47 road improvement projects are: n A47/A141 Guyhirn junction n A47 Wansford to Sutton dualling n A47 North Tuddenham to Easton dualling n A47/A11 Thickthorn junction n A47 Blofield to North Burlingham dualling n A47 Great Yarmouth junction About the A47/A141 Guyhirn junction project Project benefits A47 We’ll be making changes to the Guyhirn junction between the A47 (Fen Our improvements to the junction will: Road to South Brink) and the A141 (March Road) which is used by over B1187 GuyhirnGuyhirn 20,000 vehicles a day and experiences high levels of congestion. The n reduce delays and queuing traffic by increasing the size of the Guyhirn South Brink changes to the junction aim to reduce congestion, improve journey times roundabout Gull Road High Road and increase safety. n improve safety by increasing visibility for drivers when they enter the roundabout Following our Preferred Route Announcement (PRA) in 2017, we undertook n improve pedestrian crossings and footpaths, particularly between Proposed traffic light R i v e r N e n e controlled crossing a variety of technical and traffic surveys to help us finalise our design for the March Road, Guyhirn village and local amenities New enlarged roundabout project.
    [Show full text]
  • Hate Crime Report 031008
    HATE CRIMES IN THE OSCE REGION -INCIDENTS AND RESPONSES ANNUAL REPORT FOR 2007 Warsaw, October 2008 Foreword In 2007, violent manifestations of intolerance continued to take place across the OSCE region. Such acts, although targeting individuals, affected entire communities and instilled fear among victims and members of their communities. The destabilizing effect of hate crimes and the potential for such crimes and incidents to threaten the security of individuals and societal cohesion – by giving rise to wider-scale conflict and violence – was acknowledged in the decision on tolerance and non-discrimination adopted by the OSCE Ministerial Council in Madrid in November 2007.1 The development of this report is based on the task the Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR) received “to serve as a collection point for information and statistics on hate crimes and relevant legislation provided by participating States and to make this information publicly available through … its report on Challenges and Responses to Hate-Motivated Incidents in the OSCE Region”.2 A comprehensive consultation process with governments and civil society takes place during the drafting of the report. In February 2008, ODIHR issued a first call to the nominated national points of contact on combating hate crime, to civil society, and to OSCE institutions and field operations to submit information for this report. The requested information included updates on legislative developments, data on hate crimes and incidents, as well as practical initiatives for combating hate crime. I am pleased to note that the national points of contact provided ODIHR with information and updates on a more systematic basis.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of the 27Th Plenary Session, October 2003
    BRITISH-IRISH INTER- PARLIAMENTARY BODY COMHLACHT IDIR- PHARLAIMINTEACH NA BREATAINE AGUS NA hÉIREANN _________________________ TWENTY-SEVENTH PLENARY CONFERENCE 20 and 21 OCTOBER 2003 Hanbury Manor Hotel & Country Club, Ware, Hertfordshire _______________________ OFFICIAL REPORT (Final Revised Edition) (Produced by the British-Irish Parliamentary Reporting Association) Any queries should be sent to: The Editor The British-Irish Parliamentary Reporting Association Room 248 Parliament Buildings Stormont Belfast BT4 3XX Tel: 028 90521135 e-mail [email protected] IN ATTENDANCE Co-Chairmen Mr Brendan Smith TD Mr David Winnick MP Members and Associate Members Mr Harry Barnes MP Mr Séamus Kirk TD Senator Paul Bradford Senator Terry Le Sueur Mr Johnny Brady TD Dr Dai Lloyd AM Rt Hon the Lord Brooke Rt Hon Andrew Mackay MP of Sutton Mandeville CH Mr Andrew Mackinlay MP Mr Alistair Carmichael MP Dr John Marek AM Senator Paul Coughlan Mr Michael Mates MP Dr Jerry Cowley TD Rt Hon Sir Brian Mawhinney MP Mr Seymour Crawford TD Mr Kevin McNamara MP Dr Jimmy Devins TD Mr David Melding AM The Lord Dubs Senator Paschal Mooney Ms Helen Eadie MSP Mr Arthur Morgan TD Mr John Ellis TD Mr Alasdair Morrison MSP Mr Jeff Ennis MP Senator Francie O’Brien Ms Margaret Ewing MSP Mr William O’Brien MP Mr Paul Flynn MP Mr Donald J Gelling CBE MLC Ms Liz O’Donnell TD Mr Mike German AM Mr Ned O’Keeffe TD Mr Jim Glennon TD Mr Jim O’Keeffe TD The Lord Glentoran CBE DL Senator Ann Ormonde Mr Dominic Grieve MP Mr Séamus Pattison TD Mr John Griffiths AM Senator
    [Show full text]
  • Skeffington Parish Walks
    Skeffington This leaflet is one of a series produced to promote circular walking throughout the county. You can obtain Skeffington others in the series by visiting your local library, Tourist Information Centre or download them from www.leics.gov.uk/paths. circular 2 walks Bottesford 1 3½kms/2¼ miles Muston Redmile 2 8½kms/5¼ miles Wymeswold Scalford Hathern Burton on the Wolds Thorpe Acre & Prestwold Asfordby Barrow upon Soar Frisby Rearsby Normanton le Heath Barkby Ibstock Twyford Appleby Swepstone Anstey Hungarton Magna Groby Tilton & Lowesby 4 Carlton Ratby Keyham Skeffington, Desford Rolleston & Tugby 4 The path is well Thurnby l Burton Overy Wistow Hallaton marked and soon bears right Narborough through two gates about 100m apart. Medbourne Burbage Kibworth Cross the fields, to a narrow bridge on & Smeeton Westerby Laughton the left. Then follow the waymarkers Ullesthorpe Lubenham uphill to eventually reach Tugby along a surfaced path passing to the right of the three houses ahead. l5 Walk up Main Street into the village, then turn left The routes are clearly marked with bold, yellow It is advisable to wear suitable footwear when walking. into Chapel Lane. Note the Fox and Hounds public topped waymarker posts and waymarker discs Stout shoes or walking boots are recommended. house is just up on the right. Continue up the path with the Parish Walks symbol. Some stretches of the route follow minor country roads. Beware to the right, passing “Meadowcroft” on the right, then of traffic approaching from both directions. If possible stay on the through a small metal gate and onto a narrow path.
    [Show full text]
  • Women Mps in Westminster Photographs Taken May 21St, June 3Rd, June 4Th, 2008
    “The House of Commons Works of Art Collection documents significant moments in Parliamentary history. We are delighted to have added this unique photographic record of women MPs of today, to mark the 90th anniversary of women first being able to take their seats in this House” – Hugo Swire, Chairman, The Speaker's Advisory Committee on Works of Art. “The day the Carlton Club accepted women” – 90 years after women first got the vote aim to ensure that a more enduring image of On May 21st 2008 over half of all women women's participation in the political process Members of Parliament in Westminster survives. gathered party by party to have group photographs taken to mark the anniversary of Each party gave its permission for the 90 years since women first got the vote (in photographs to be taken. For the Labour February 1918 women over 30 were first Party, Barbara Follett MP, the then Deputy granted the vote). Minister for Women and Equality, and Barbara Keeley MP, who was Chair of the Labour Party Women’s Committee and The four new composite Caroline Adams, who works for the photographs taken party by Parliamentary Labour Party helped ensure that all but 12 of the Labour women party aim to ensure that a attended. more enduring image of For the Conservative women's participation in the Party, The Shadow Leader of the House of political process survives Commons and Shadow Minister for Until now the most often used photographic Women, Theresa May image of women MPs had been the so called MP and the Chairman “Blair Babes” picture taken on 7th May 1997 of the Conservative shortly after 101 Labour women were elected Party, Caroline to Westminster as a result of positive action by Spelman MP, enlisted the Labour Party.
    [Show full text]
  • Adam Dant 'The Government Stable'
    ADAM DANT ‘THE GOVERNMENT STABLE’ 2015 GENERAL ELECTION ARTWORK – A KEY TO THE DRAWING ADAM DANT ‘THE GOVERNMENT STABLE’ 2015 GENERAL ELECTION ARTWORK Places: 1. Leeds Town Hall: The Victorian Civic architectural splendor of Leeds Town Hall was the venue for the BBC’s final leadership orations. The ceiling and arches are decorated with the logos of the UK political parties. 2. Central Methodist Hall, Westminster: The clock and pipe organ are from the Central Methodist Hall where the BBC’s ‘Challengers’ Debate’ took place. At 10pm the clock marks the time that polling stations across the UK closed and voting ended. 3. Swindon University Technical College Water Tower and Courtyard Pavement: Venue for The Conservative Party Manifesto Launch; the college occupies Swindon’s former Railway Village. 4. Testbed 1 Nightclub Battersea: Hanging from the ceiling are glow-stick lights from the trendy, power-cut-hit, Liberal Democrat Manifesto launch venue. Panels on the ceiling are decorated with the Lib Dem’s backdrop of children’s hand prints. 5. Arcellor Mittal Tower, Queen Elizabeth ll Olympic Park: The Labour Party Election Campaign launch took place in the viewing gallery of the Mittal tower. The party leader was introduced by an NHS nurse entering through a receiving line of cheering Labour Student activists. 6. Escalators from UKIP’s poster on immigration policy. 7. Rahere Climbing Centre, Edinburgh: Vertiginous, hand hold studded climbing walls provided the backdrop to the Scottish National party Manifesto launch. 8. The White Cliffs of Dover: The United Kingdom Independence Party unveiled a campaign poster depicting three escalators traveling up the White Cliffs of Dover at The Coastguard Inn, St Margaret’s with the cliffs the English Channel and France Telecom on everyone’s mobile phones as a backdrop.
    [Show full text]
  • On Parliamentary Representation)
    House of Commons Speaker's Conference (on Parliamentary Representation) Session 2008–09 Volume II Written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 21 April 2009 HC 167 -II Published on 27 May 2009 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 Speaker’s Conference (on Parliamentary Representation) The Conference secretariat will be able to make individual submissions available in large print or Braille on request. The Conference secretariat can be contacted on 020 7219 0654 or [email protected] On 12 November 2008 the House of Commons agreed to establish a new committee, to be chaired by the Speaker, Rt. Hon. Michael Martin MP and known as the Speaker's Conference. The Conference has been asked to: "Consider, and make recommendations for rectifying, the disparity between the representation of women, ethnic minorities and disabled people in the House of Commons and their representation in the UK population at large". It may also agree to consider other associated matters. The Speaker's Conference has until the end of the Parliament to conduct its inquiries. Current membership Miss Anne Begg MP (Labour, Aberdeen South) (Vice-Chairman) Ms Diane Abbott MP (Labour, Hackney North & Stoke Newington) John Bercow MP (Conservative, Buckingham) Mr David Blunkett MP (Labour, Sheffield, Brightside) Angela Browning MP (Conservative, Tiverton & Honiton) Mr Ronnie Campbell MP (Labour, Blyth Valley) Mrs Ann Cryer MP (Labour, Keighley) Mr Parmjit Dhanda MP (Labour, Gloucester) Andrew George MP (Liberal Democrat, St Ives) Miss Julie Kirkbride MP (Conservative, Bromsgrove) Dr William McCrea MP (Democratic Unionist, South Antrim) David Maclean MP (Conservative, Penrith & The Border) Fiona Mactaggart MP (Labour, Slough) Mr Khalid Mahmood MP (Labour, Birmingham Perry Barr) Anne Main MP (Conservative, St Albans) Jo Swinson MP (Liberal Democrat, East Dunbartonshire) Mrs Betty Williams MP (Labour, Conwy) Publications The Reports and evidence of the Conference are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
    Monday Volume 587 10 November 2014 No. 59 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Monday 10 November 2014 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2014 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 1161 10 NOVEMBER 2014 1162 delayed? An answer was expected in December, but it House of Commons has been delayed to January and then to the end of January. Will he tell us when he will make a decision? Monday 10 November 2014 Mr Pickles: As the hon. Gentleman knows, we do not call in many applications for consideration. Last year, The House met at half-past Two o’clock we called in only about eight. The one he has mentioned has some degree of complexity, and he will understand PRAYERS that I cannot comment about the individual application until all the facts are before me. [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] Mr Mark Prisk (Hertford and Stortford) (Con): I strongly support the Minister’s excellent work in devolving Mr Speaker: I remind the House that tomorrow, powers to our city regions. Will he assure us that our Tuesday 11 November, is Armistice day. At 11 o’clock counties and rural areas such as those in east Hertfordshire tomorrow, I regard it as appropriate that we, and staff will have the same opportunity for these new responsibilities? working for us, should join the nation in observing the two-minute silence so that we might remember those Mr Pickles: Such areas most certainly do have the who gave their lives for their country to help preserve same opportunity.
    [Show full text]