COLLEGE and UNIVERSITY
Vol. 94 Nº 4 @ Fall 2019 Educating the Modern Higher Education Administration Professional
An Alternative to Institutional Autonomy College “Choice” Models and Academic Freedom and Frameworks: in Hungary: The Iloh Model of College-Going A Historiography of Hungarian Decisions and Trajectories Higher Education
An Interview with Brad Myers
FORUM Campus Viewpoint Research in Brief Commentary Book Reviews Rethinking Institutional Academic Fraud and the Credential Engine: Use Case What’s Next for Student Readiness for Online World’s Largest Diploma Mill Scenarios for Registrars Veterans? Moving Transfer Student Success from Transition to The Transfer Data: The Key That Unlocks Academic Success Mentor Program: Student Success (Another How One University Personal Perspective Athena Rising: Enhanced the Transfer From Across the Pond) How and Why Men Student Experience Should Mentor Women Servant Leadership, the College Bubble, and Saving Higher Education Enrollment through International Online Programs in Which the Language of Instruction Is Other than English
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGIATE REGISTRARS AND ADMISSIONS OFFICERS 10 6 th
ANNUAL MEETING
APRIL 5 - 8 ERNEST N. MORIAL CONVENTION CENTER NEW ORLEANS, LA 2020 www.aacrao.org
Celebrating 110 Years: 1910-2020
227646_AACRAO_2020AnnualMeeting_8.5x11_Bleeds.indd 1 2/14/19 3:14 PM Founded in 1910, the American Association of Collegiate Registrars and Admissions Officers (AACRAO) is one of the nation’s oldest and largest higher education associations. Widely regarded as the leading authority on the emerging field of and enrollment management, the association is a COLLEGE recognized source of information on student admissions, academic records, technology solutions and international education. In addition to its professional UNIVERSITY development offerings, AACRAO serves as an independent advocate for Vol. 94 Nº 4 @ Fall 2019 the collegiate sector on a broad range of policy issues in Washington, D.C. The Association’s policy agenda is founded on the principles of academic 2 An Alternative to College “Choice” autonomy, access and accountability.
All rights reserved. AACRAO is a Models and Frameworks: registered trademark. Use, reproduction, The Iloh Model of College-Going Decisions and Trajectories copying or redistribution of the AACRAO logo is strictly prohibited without By Constance Iloh written permission from AACRAO.
WWAACRAO adheres to the principles of non-discrimination without regard to 10 Institutional Autonomy and age, color, handicap or disability, ethnic or national origin, race, religion, gender Academic Freedom in Hungary: (including discrimination taking the form of sexual harassment), marital, parental A Historiography of Hungarian Higher Education or veteran status, or sexual orientation. WWAACRAO does not endorse the products By Laura Parson and Ariel Steele or services of any advertiser. The advertiser assumes responsibility and liability for the content of any advertising. WWThe articles published in College and 24 An Interview with Brad Myers University do not reflect the opinions or positions of the Association. By Louise Lonabocker
POSTMASTER: Send address changes to College and University, One Dupont FORUM Circle, NW, Suite , Washington, D.C. -. Copyright © 18 Campus The Transfer Mentor Success (Another Instruction Is Other American Association of Collegiate Program: How One Personal Perspective than English...... 71 Registrars and Admissions Officers. Viewpoint University Enhanced From Across By Nailya O. DeLellis College and University (USPS ) is Rethinking the Transfer Student the Pond)...... 55 and Anthony J. DeLellis published four times a year by the American Institutional Readiness Experience...... 47 By Philip Henry Association of Collegiate Registrars for Online Transfer By Brooke Lockhart Book Reviews and Admissions Officers, One Dupont Student Success...... 33 Servant Leadership, What’s Next for Circle, NW, Suite , Washington, D.C. Commentary the College Bubble, -. The cost of the publication is By Melissa Allen Student Veterans? included in the AACRAO membership Credential Engine: and Saving Higher Moving from fee. For information on subscriptions Research Use Case Scenarios Education...... 67 Transition to and package rates, please visit aacrao. in Brief for Registrars...... 51 By James Wicks Academic Success.. 75 org/cu. Back issues are 30 each (price Academic Fraud and By Rodney Parks and Athena Rising: How includes shipping). ISSN: -. Enrollment through Alexander Taylor the World’s Largest International Online and Why Men Should INDEXES: College and University is Diploma Mill...... 39 Mentor Women...... 76 indexed in Current Index to Journals Data: The Key That Programs in Which By Allen Ezell Reviewed by Adrienne in Education (ERIC), Education Unlocks Student the Language of Bricker and Tara Hornor Index, Higher Education Abstracts and Contents Pages in Education.
AACRAO Board of Directors VICE PRESIDENT FOR ADMISSIONS VICE PRESIDENT FOR AND ENROLLMENT INTERNATIONAL VICE PRESIDENT FOR PRESIDENT PRESIDENT-ELECT PAST PRESIDENT MANAGEMENT EDUCATION ACCESS AND EQUITY Luisa Havens Gerardo Jack Miner Tina Falkner Tammy Aagard Jennifer Minke Tiffany Robinson Virginia Tech The Ohio State University University of Minnesota– University of Florida Tarrant County The University of Kansas Twin Cities College District
VICE PRESIDENT FOR LEADERSHIP VICE PRESIDENT FOR VICE PRESIDENT FOR AND MANAGEMENT RECORDS AND VICE PRESIDENT INFORMATION VICE PRESIDENT VICE PRESIDENT DEVELOPMENT ACADEMIC SERVICES FOR FINANCE TECHNOLOGY AT LARGE AT LARGE Jerry Montag Kristi Wold-McCormick Stan DeMerritt Mark McConahay Rhonda Kitch Tim Amyx Northern Illinois University University of South Plains College Indiana University– North Dakota Volunteer State Colorado Boulder Bloomington State University Community College Write for C&U Editorial Board EDITOR IN CHIEF Jeffrey von Munkwitz-Smith College and University AACRAO
What’s the best way to share vehicle for shaping the profes- Daniel Bender University of the Pacific your ideas, innovations, and sion and gaining recognition. Adrienne Bricker opinions with registrars, ad- AACRAO members are es- University of Minnesota missions officers, and enroll- pecially encouraged to submit Marc Camille ment managers nationwide? articles, but non-members, Loyola University Contribute to AACRAO’s pres- faculty, graduate students, and Sharon Cramer Buffalo State University tigious College and University members of the corporate sec- Julie Ferguson (C&U) quarterly journal. tor are also welcome to share University of Scranton Give your research and ex- their work. Authors will receive Matthew Fifolt University of Alabama at Birmingham perience a voice by writing for copies of the issue in which Theresa Gallo the “Feature” section, or ad- their article appears, and will Drexel University dress best practices, how-tos, be issued an honorarium. Polly Griffin new technologies, the latest For editorial procedures Princeton University books, and other pertinent and manuscript preparation Lisa Holstrom University of Cincinnati topics in “The Forum” sec- guidelines, visit
Jeff von Munkwitz-Smith, Ph.D. Editor-in-Chief [email protected]
Were you inspired over the summer to share your that Unlocks Student Success — Another Personal thoughts in a commentary, share a project in a campus Perspective from Across the Pond,” by Philip Henry; viewpoint, or share your research in a feature article? “Servant Leadership, the College Bubble, and Saving Did you read a book on a higher education topic and Higher Education,” by James Wicks; and “Increasing think, “I should write a review for C&U”? The C&U Enrollment through International Online Programs in editors are always looking for authors! which the Language of Instruction is Other than Eng- This edition includes three feature articles. In “An lish,” by Nailya O. DeLellis and Anthony J. DeLellis. Alternative to College ‘Choice’ Models and Frame- Our two research in brief articles are “Diploma Mills works: The Iloh Model of College-Going Decisions and Counterfeit Operations,” by Allen Ezell, and “The and Trajectories,” Constance Iloh describes an alterna- Transfer Mentor Program: How One University En- tive model of college choice that explores the realities hanced the Transfer Student Experience,” by Brooke of the diversity of prospective students, “from the main- Lockhart. There is also a campus viewpoint article, stream to the margins.” “Rethinking Institutional Readiness for Online Transfer Laura Parson and Ariel Steele present Institutional Student Success,” by Melissa Allen. Autonomy and Academic Freedom in Hungary: A His- We include two book reviews in this edition. Tara toriography of Hungarian Higher Education.” Homer reviews What’s Next for Student Veterans? Mov- Continuing our interview series, Louise Lonabocker, ing from Transition to Academic Success, by David DiRa- AACRAO past president and retired executive director mio, and Adrienne Bricker reviews Athena Rising: How of student services and university registrar at Boston and Why Men Should Mentor Women, by David Smith College, interviews Brad Myers, AACRAO past presi- and W. Brad Johnson. dent and retired university registrar at The Ohio State My thanks to all who contributed to this edition of University. College and University! I hope, dear reader, that you will There are four commentaries in this issue: “Cre- be inspired by something you read here to submit an dential Engine: Use Case Scenarios for Registrars,” by article or book review for a future edition. Enjoy a fan- Rodney Parks and Alexander Taylor; “Data, the Key tastic fall!
Fall 2019 COLLEGE and UNIVERSITY – 1 – FEATURE
An Alternative to College “Choice” Models and Frameworks: The Iloh Model of College-Going Decisions and Trajectories
The decisions to go to college and where are life-altering. Accordingly, college choice theory has been a necessary framework for understanding access and destinations in postsecondary education. The author argues for the need to depart from framing college-going around “choice” and puts forth a timely and context-driven alternative to previous college choice frameworks. In particular, the Iloh Model of College-Going Decisions and Trajectories illuminates the bidirectional relationship among three dimensions (information, time, and opportunity). The paper concludes with new directions for researchers, community members, leaders, and practitioners across the P–20 education pipeline.
Vol. 94 Nº 4 – 2 – COLLEGE and UNIVERSITY By Constance Iloh
tudents are among the most im- cultural capital; academic performance; and P–20 edu- portant stakeholders in the higher cation environments as they relate to their impact on the education ecosystem. How they college choice process (Hearn 1991; McDonough 1997; decide on attending college and Niu, Tienda and Cortes 2006; Perna 2006; Stephenson, why they select a particular col- Heckert and Yerger 2016). While adding to the litera- lege have often been considered ture and even revealing the impact of some elements by way of college choice theory. of social contexts on college choice, such frameworks But what does it really mean to and empirical works lack attention to the interactions “choose” a college? And are the of complex contexts and ecosystems and how they in- frameworks for understanding form college-going decisions and trajectories. this phenomenon sufficient? I -ar With more than 32 years having passed since its gue that not only is a departure initial development, the Hossler and Gallagher (1987) from college “choice” needed, but a three-dimensional model remains one of the most-used frameworks for ecological model can help us better understand the understanding college choice. Knowing that college- complexities, realities, and inequities of the college-go- going is far from a one-size-fits-all endeavor and often ingS decisions and trajectories of today’s students. a fragmented process, this paper pivots from a prevail- ing model and college choice conceptual landscape that may only account for a subsection of students (and College Choice Revisited might even skew those realities). While this dominant In 1987, College and University published what would model has added meaningfully to our understanding of become one of—if not the most—recognized college the college enrollment process and enrollment manage- choice model. Hossler and Gallagher (1987) provided ment, it is also likely to mask complexities that result in a three-stage linear model that highlights how high highly stratified and inequitable college-going narratives. school students are predisposed to go to college, gather (or search) for information about institutions of higher learning, with this culminating in the final stage, in A New Model which students make a choice about which college to Without the “Choice” attend. Other notable frameworks rooted in sociology, One of the motivations for the creation of a new model psychology, economics, and business have considered was the opportunity to challenge the idea of “choice” elements such as costs and financing; family members’ in college choice frameworks. Choice and college-go- educational background and support; policy; social and ing can become easily conflated in ways that hinder
Fall 2019 COLLEGE and UNIVERSITY – 3 – understanding of the reality of college access. I assert does not reference or contain choice at all, and, rather, that there are important reasons for halting inclusion of is a model of college-going decisions and trajectories. “choice” in such conceptualizations. Choice is inherently problematic because the term An Alternative Model: is laced with assumptions that begin to unravel upon consideration of race, time in the prospective student’s The Iloh Model of College-Going life, socioeconomic status, gender, location, and many Decisions and Trajectories other important factors. In particular, the framing This new model makes use of anthropology and, spe- of “choice” minimizes the role of privilege in shap- cifically, the lens of ecology as its foundation. This is be- ing college-going “options” and realities (Iloh 2018b). cause contexts should be examined synchronously, and Moreover, information, time, and opportunity are researchers should address the interconnections among not neutral but, rather, are dimensions that ultimately them (Woolley, Kohl and Bowen 2009). Moreover, an can expand or reduce one’s college-going possibilities ecological perspective draws attention to relationships based on a person’s identity, life circumstances, and between a person and society at large in addition to in- social position. This calls into question how choice can terrelationships among dimensions and factors that are be situated in a literature that at its best should expose likely to seem microscopic when considered through rather than disguise separate and unequal realities in other approaches. In the delicate and complicated co- college-going. nundrum of modern college access, the role of ecology Choice in college choice models often considers a and its importance to this model cannot be understated. student’s attendance in college as a one-time event The model of college-going decisions and trajectories that likely happens upon graduation from high school. highlights interactions among three dimensions that de- Other models don’t provide much clarity as to what termine a person’s college decisions: information, time, happens for students who are highly mobile, are much and opportunity (see Figure 1, on page 5). Each older when they attend college, and have obligations component informs how different prospective students that make a “conventional” college-going pathway im- make decisions about higher education pathways amid probable, for example. With other frameworks, what their complex lives. Unlike the Hossler and Gallagher happens to these “choices” is especially a mystery for (1987) model and many other sequential choice frame- students who weave in and out of the same or different works, information, time, and opportunity have non- institutions of higher learning as they seek to complete linear and codependent relationships with one another, a degree or credential. Moving away from choice al- even though each is its own separate component (Iloh lows for understanding the role of prior decisions and 2018b). The same model can be used at different points experiences on future decisions (if any). It will also in one’s life to uncover the context and rationale behind allow for a better understanding of how options and different decisions as well as one’s trajectory overall. routes shrink or simply become non-existent. This new model is designed to account for complex college path- ways and not just isolated choices at one point. This Dimension of Information also makes room for the reality that college as we know The information dimension of the model examines the it for many students is not a one-stop experience in kinds of, quality of, quantity of, and delivery of infor- which one decides to start pursuing a degree at one mation shaping a college-going decision and trajectory. institution and finishes there without any interruption “Students with access to multiple sources of credible or other decisions. Ultimately, moving from “choice” information are likely able to make more informed contributes to a deeper understanding that the P–20 decisions” (Iloh 2018b, 236). In understanding the education pipeline is likely fragmented and complex for plethora of insights that might be shared with an indi- a plethora of students who find themselves outside of a vidual, I consider the distinct qualities of general and/ linear and trite college-going narrative. or institutional college information as well as recom- Choice distorts the realities of already complicated mendations and warnings. General information tends narratives. By doing so, it also creates a blind spot in to be impartial and likely lacks persuasive or caution- the literature. Hence, the model put forth in this text ary messaging directed toward or against enrollment in
– 4 – COLLEGE and UNIVERSITY Vol. 94 Nº 4 Figure 1. RMAT FO O The Iloh Model of College-Going Decisions and Trajectories College
Decision/ O
Trajectory