The Van Gogh Murder and Beyond
[ 5 ] The Van Gogh Murder and Beyond BEATRICE DE GRAAF n 2007, the Dutch General Intelligence and Security Service (Algemene Inlichtingen- en Veiligheidsdienst, AIVD) dened a jihadist network as “a uid, dynamic, vaguely bounded structure, consisting of a number of individuals (radical Muslims). They are inter- Irelated at both individual and aggregated level (cells/groups) and are at least temporarily linked by a common interest. That interest is the striving towards an objective that can be related to jihadism (including terrorism).”1 In the Netherlands, such networks manifested themselves with dierent degrees of national versus international embeddedness. In this chapter, I will submit these purported compositions and the shifts between them to a historicizing analysis. This chapter discusses the shifting nature of jihadist networks in the Netherlands as attributed to them by the AIVD and counter- terrorist organizations, with a special focus on the network dubbed the “Hofstad Group,” which was identied and manifested itself in 2003. Other authors, notably Lorenzo Vidino in his seminal text on the Hof- stad Group, have argued that these groups were strictly homegrown.2 Vidino’s description and many of his conclusions still stand. However, upon closer examination, the denitions and boundaries proposed by intelligence ocials and academics between internationally organized terrorist attacks by existent terrorist groups with top-down command Copyright © 2014. Columbia University Press. All rights reserved. University Press. All © 2014. Columbia Copyright structures, on the one hand, and the “new,” loosely knit, bottom-up ter- ror cells that have emerged in Europe since 2002, on the other, seem to Hoffman, B., & Reinares, F.
[Show full text]