The Knowledge Web Michael B

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Knowledge Web Michael B United States Education & Training Services Knowledge Enterprises 23 May 2000 (Reprint) Michael T. Moe, CFA Henry Blodget The Knowledge Web Michael B. Armstrong Kathleen Bailey Neil Godsey Chandy Smith Part 4: Corporate e-Learning – Feeding Hungry Minds Thatcher Thompson Scott Wilson Highlights: $300 Billion Market Catalyzed by the Internet Continuous Learning Required by the New Economy is Driving Huge and Rapidly Growing Market Merrill Lynch & Co. Global Securities Research & Economics Group Global Fundamental Equity Research Department RC#60227210 The Knowledge Web – 23 May 2000 (Reprint) Knowledge Enterprises Group Michael T. Moe, CFA Director of Global Growth Research (1) 415 676-3570 [email protected] Education Services & Knowledge Enterprises Business & Employee Services Kathleen Bailey Thatcher Thompson Vice President Director (1) 415 676-3572 (1) 212 449-8787 [email protected] [email protected] Scott Wilson Chandy Smith Vice President Assistant Vice President (1) 415 676-3541 (1) 212 449-0841 [email protected] [email protected] Global Internet Research Neil Godsey Assistant Vice President (1) 415 676-3574 Henry Blodget [email protected] Senior Internet Analyst, Global Coordinator (1) 212 449-0773 Michael B. Armstrong [email protected] Industry Analyst (1) 415 676-3585 Kirsten Campbell [email protected] Assistant Vice President (1) 212 449-3113 [email protected] "Albert Einstein"™ Licensed by the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Represented by the Roger Richman Agency, Inc., Beverly Hills, CA 90212 www.albert-einstein.net" 2 The Knowledge Web – 23 May 2000 (Reprint) Introduction to the e-Knowledge Industry The new economy moves at a pace never seen before. The new providing continuing education, employment opportunities economy is a knowledge economy based on brainpower, ideas and relevant information, will be knowledge nerve centers and entrepreneurism. Technology is the driver of the new for vertical knowledge communities. economy, and human capital is its fuel. The knowledge Colleges and universities are the most wired community economy is people-centric. Our economy has evolved from on the Web, with over 90% of college students accessing manufacturing-intensive to labor-extensive. Fundamental to the Internet, 52% of them daily. Students spend nearly 19 success in the new economy is how companies obtain, train and hours per week on the Internet, 84% of the time pursuing retain knowledge workers. The knowledge enterprise industry academic activities. College students currently spend $105 is over $2.2 trillion. We expect the online component to grow billion annually, with $1.5 billion of that online. Higher ed from $9.4 billion to $53.3 billion by 2003, a 54% CAGR. hubs provide educators and e-commerce companies access Ubiquitous PCs and high-speed bandwidth will facilitate access to this very compelling demographic. to knowledge anytime, anywhere. The Internet democratizes The Internet creates one economy and one market. As knowledge, increasing access to it, lowering its cost and large as the online higher education market is in the U.S., ultimately improving its quality. We believe combining the the global opportunity is significantly greater. Unlike the “richness” of an offline experience and the “reach” that only the U.S. where post-secondary education is relatively Internet provides creates a network effect that allows scale available, access to world-class post-secondary institutions knowledge enterprises to be born. Moreover, we see significant in many parts of the world is limited. Currently, there are potential advantages that offline operators can achieve by 84 million students enrolled in higher education leveraging their experience and brand online. worldwide. Global demand for higher education is e-Commerce has forced all traditional businesses to forecasted to reach 160 million by 2025 − if online compete at Internet speed. In a 4% unemployment learning captures even half of this growth, there would be economy with 65% of all the new jobs created requiring 40 million students for online education. We predict that skills, 70% of Fortune 1000 CEOs are saying that finding in the next five years, there will be global virtual qualified workers is a major issue for growth. “Time-to- universities with potentially millions of students enrolled. competency” is a bottleneck or a strategic advantage We project that the online higher education market will depending on how effective an organization is at finding grow to $7 billion by 2003 in the U.S. alone. and training knowledge workers. Domestic online The number of K-12 schools connected to the Internet has corporate learning is expected to grow from $1.1 billion in climbed from 35% in 1994 to 96% today. Today’s kids are 1999 to $11.4 billion in 2003, a 79% CAGR, and online − − staffing and recruiting, critical functions of human capital the Internet Generation Generation i and are as comfortable on a computer as on a bicycle. With 53 million management, is projected to grow from $5.8 billion in schoolchildren, three million teachers and 23 million 1999 to $28 billion in 2003, a 48% CAGR. families, the K-12 marketplace encompasses a huge number The information revolution that began with the birth of the of potential users. The Internet is the world’s greatest PC is really the knowledge revolution. e-Commerce is to library and gives a student in Minot the same access to the knowledge revolution what the railroads were to the knowledge as a student in Manhattan. Key for improvement industrial revolution. We think enterprises building in learner outcome is getting parents involved − the home- “knowledge tracks,” or infrastructure, into the corporate school connection − and email has already proven to be an market, K-12 community, and higher education spaces are effective communication tool between parents and teachers. poised to enjoy explosive growth. The Internet is all about disproportionate gains to the Integrating quality educational content with leaders of a category. The gigantic opportunity has not testing/assessment and certification programs is the new st been lost on investors, with over $3 billion in venture education paradigm for the 21 century. In the knowledge capital funds flowing into knowledge enterprises in the economy, assessment is the currency with which all skills past fifteen months alone. By focusing on knowledge are valued. The four engines of the new economy – enterprises that contain the 4 P’s (People, Product, computers, telecommunications, healthcare and Potential and Predictability) and other key differentiating instrumentation – employ approximately 50 knowledge factors, notably the network effect outlined in this report, workers per 100 employees and are growing. These we hope to identify the Yahoo!s from the yahoos and technology-intensive industries are growing 3-6 times as provide outsized investment returns for what we see as an fast as economy-wide job growth. Career vortals, outsized opportunity. 3 The Knowledge Web – 23 May 2000 (Reprint) Fast Facts: The New Economy • The pay gap separating a high school graduate from a • The amount spent on online advertising is expected to college graduate was 50% in 1980. Today, it has increase tenfold from $3.3 billion in 1999 to $33 reached 111%. Looked at another way, a 30-year-old billion in 2004, a 58% CAGR. male with a high school diploma earns just two-thirds • At the end of 1998 there were approximately 88 of what he earned 25 years ago. Even so, only 21% of Internet stocks. Currently, there are approximately American adults over the age of 25 have a bachelor’s 400 with nearly a half trillion dollars of market cap. degree or better. • Approximately 50% of the total Internet market cap is • In 1980, the price-to-book ratio of the ten largest accounted for by the five largest Internet companies, publicly traded companies in the U.S. was 1.2x. providing evidence for the belief that, on the Internet, Today, the price-to-book is 12.1x, or ten times greater. the winners “take all.” This multiple expansion correlates directly with the increased productivity of a company’s intangible • Studies show that effective management of human assets – its human capital. capital can improve shareholder value by up to 30%. • On average, each employee at the leading “New • By our estimates, the e-knowledge market will reach Economy” companies is “worth” $38 million based on $53.3 billion by 2003 from $9.4 billion in 1999, market cap-per-employee. In contrast, each employee growing at a CAGR of 54%. at the leading “Old Economy” companies is worth • Reflecting the transformation of technology in our about $689,000, or less than 2% of employee value at economy, in 2000, skilled jobs will represent 65% of the New Economy companies. all jobs. This is expected to expand to 85% by 2005, • Venture capital funding in knowledge enterprises up from just 20% in 1950. amounted to over $3 billion since January 1999, or • Knowledge Services – education and corporate about triple the total invested in the previous 9 years. learning for the new economy – is a $885 billion • At the end of 1999, more than 196 million people industry in the U.S. and a $2-trillion industry globally. were using the Internet worldwide. The number of • Web-based corporate learning should enjoy explosive global Internet users is expected to more than triple to growth, measuring $11.4 billion by 2003, up from 638 million by 2004, a 27% CAGR. $550 million in 1998, an 83% CAGR. • The “free agent” mindset of today’s knowledge worker • By 2002, technology-based training will capture the is evidenced by the fact that the average person entering majority of dollars for IT training, at 55% versus the the workforce today will work for between 8 and 10 45% share captured by instructor-led methods. different employers versus 4 to 6 a decade ago.
Recommended publications
  • Service Schedule for BT Web Conferencing Service Powered by Microsoft Live Meeting
    Service Schedule for BT Web Conferencing Service powered by Microsoft Live Meeting 1. INTERPRETATION “Account” means an identifier that BT gives to the Customer. This identifier is used on all records. “BT Conferencing” means the business unit of BT that provides conferencing services. “Live Meeting” means the web conferencing service provided under this Contract and is the BT Web Conferencing Service powered by Microsoft Office Live Meeting service. “Microsoft” means PlaceWare Inc a wholly owned subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation. “Organiser” means the person whose account the meeting is booked under. “Presenter” means the person presenting the visual information to the audience. “Participant” means a person or persons connected to the Service. “BT Conference Coordinator” means the individual who will assist during the conference. “Minimum Period” means the initial term as stated in the order form. “Third Party Information” means data, information, video, graphics, sound, music, photographs, software and any other materials (in whatever form) not owned or generated by or on behalf of the Customer, published or otherwise made available by the Customer using Live Meeting 2007. Reference in this Contract to a month shall be deemed to mean a calendar month unless the context requires otherwise. Version 1.1 Page 1 of 6 August 2008 BT1006ee 2. SERVICE DESCRIPTION 2.1 Live Meeting Office Live Meeting provides the ability to share a PC desktop with a group of individuals for the purposes of collaborative working and presentations. Live Meeting uses advanced secure sockets layer encryption as standard. Table of included service features Service Features Number of participants Total number of participants that can join 1250* each meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Virtual Workplaces When Metaphors Breakdown
    Virtual Workplaces When Metaphors Breakdown by Thomas W. I. Gallemore B.Arch, Carnegie Mellon, 1991 Submitted to the Department of Architecture in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Architecture Studies in Design Technology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology June 1998 @ 1998 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. All rights reserved. Signature of the Author Thomas W. I. Gallemore Department of Architecture May 8,1998 , N 1 Certified By William L. Porter Norman B. and Muriel Leventhal Professor of Architecture and Planning Thesis ervisor Accepted by Roy Strickland Associate Professor of Architecture Chairman, Departmental Committee on Graduate Students J1 71998 Virtual Workplaces When Metaphors Breakdown by Thomas W. Gallemore Submitted to the Department of Architecture on May 8, 1998 in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Architecture Studies Abstract Our model of work is shaped by the places we choose to work and the tools we choose to work with. As we introduce new technologies and build new environments our model is changing. Today's virtual workplaces are grounded in models of work that have been reformed from our experiences using current technology in physical workspace. However we are discovering opportunities and possibilities for work in collaborative, virtual environments that question physical models. Emerging patterns of distributed collaboration in persistent virtual environments are changing the way we work in time and space, recasting our notion of workplace. Virtual workplaces are interpreted and experienced through metaphors that describe a space of potential for work occurrences. Through the lens of metaphors, this research focuses on breakdowns between collaborative work and the environment in which work occurs.
    [Show full text]
  • Peer-To-Peer Grids
    Syracuse University SURFACE Electrical Engineering and Computer Science College of Engineering and Computer Science 2003 Peer-to-Peer Grids Geoffrey C. Fox Indiana University Dennis Gannon Indiana University Sung-Hoon Ko Indiana University Shrideep Pallickara Indiana University Xiaohong Qiu Indiana University and Syracuse University, [email protected] See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/eecs Part of the Computer Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Fox, Geoffrey C.; Gannon, Dennis; Ko, Sung-Hoon; Pallickara, Shrideep; Qiu, Xiaohong; and Uyar, Ahmet, "Peer-to-Peer Grids" (2003). Electrical Engineering and Computer Science. 164. https://surface.syr.edu/eecs/164 This Book Chapter is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Engineering and Computer Science at SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science by an authorized administrator of SURFACE. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Author(s)/Creator(s) Geoffrey C. Fox, Dennis Gannon, Sung-Hoon Ko, Shrideep Pallickara, Xiaohong Qiu, and Ahmet Uyar This book chapter is available at SURFACE: https://surface.syr.edu/eecs/164 Peer-to-Peer Grids Geoffrey Fox1,2,4, Dennis Gannon2, Sung-Hoon Ko1, Sangmi Lee5, Shrideep Pallickara1, Marlon Pierce1, Xiaohong Qiu1,3, Xi Rao1,2, Ahmet Uyar1,3, Minjun Wang1,3, Wenjun Wu1 1Community Grid Computing Laboratory, Indiana University 501 N Morton Suite 224, Bloomington IN 47404 2Computer Science Department, Indiana University
    [Show full text]
  • Microsoft Corporation
    A Progressive Digital Media business COMPANY PROFILE Microsoft Corporation REFERENCE CODE: 8ABE78BB-0732-4ACA-A41D-3012EBB1334D PUBLICATION DATE: 25 Jul 2017 www.marketline.com COPYRIGHT MARKETLINE. THIS CONTENT IS A LICENSED PRODUCT AND IS NOT TO BE PHOTOCOPIED OR DISTRIBUTED Microsoft Corporation TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS Company Overview ........................................................................................................3 Key Facts.........................................................................................................................3 Business Description .....................................................................................................4 History .............................................................................................................................5 Key Employees .............................................................................................................26 Key Employee Biographies .........................................................................................28 Major Products & Services ..........................................................................................35 SWOT Analysis .............................................................................................................36 Top Competitors ...........................................................................................................44 Company View ..............................................................................................................45
    [Show full text]
  • Knowledge Markets: Cooperation Among Distributed Technical Specialists
    Knowledge Markets: Cooperation Among Distributed Technical Specialists Steve Sawyer, [email protected] Kristin Eschenfelder, [email protected] Robert Heckman, [email protected] Syracuse University School of Information Studies Syracuse New York, 13244 a slightly modified version of this paper appears as: Sawyer, S., Eschenfelder, K. and Heckman, R. (2000), “Knowledge Markets: Cooperation Among Distributed Technical Specialists,” in Srikantiah, K. and Koenig, M. (Eds.) Knowledge Management for Information Professionals, Medford, NJ: Information Today, pp. 181-204. v. 4.1 as of 30 October, 1998 KEYWORDS: Knowledge Management; Knowledge Markets; Distributed Computing; Work Cultures; Social Exchange Theory; Technical Support Specialists 1 Knowledge Markets: Cooperation Among Distributed Technical Specialists Abstract Knowledge management issues are highlighted when organizational functions are decentralized. For example, distributed computing environments place more computer power in the hands of the end-user, and often demand increased technical support. In response, organizations may choose to move technical support personnel close to end- users. This can isolate them from each other, and may limit their ability to share knowledge. Thus, the growth of distributed computing calls for an increased ability to share knowledge across organizational boundaries. In that context, this paper presents the results of a case study investigating the roles of knowledge markets among distributed technologists. Our perspective is that knowledge markets are cultural entities shaped by the underlying work culture of their participants, and that the cultural forces that define knowledge markets are powerful, deeply held and difficult to change. Thus, improving the effectiveness of any given knowledge market will have less to do with the installation of information technology than with the ability to create a facilitating work culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Microsoft from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia Jump To: Navigation, Search
    Microsoft From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search Coordinates: 47°38′22.55″N 122°7′42.42″W / 47.6395972°N 122.12845°W / 47.6395972; -122.12845 Microsoft Corporation Public (NASDAQ: MSFT) Dow Jones Industrial Average Type Component S&P 500 Component Computer software Consumer electronics Digital distribution Computer hardware Industry Video games IT consulting Online advertising Retail stores Automotive software Albuquerque, New Mexico Founded April 4, 1975 Bill Gates Founder(s) Paul Allen One Microsoft Way Headquarters Redmond, Washington, United States Area served Worldwide Key people Steve Ballmer (CEO) Brian Kevin Turner (COO) Bill Gates (Chairman) Ray Ozzie (CSA) Craig Mundie (CRSO) Products See products listing Services See services listing Revenue $62.484 billion (2010) Operating income $24.098 billion (2010) Profit $18.760 billion (2010) Total assets $86.113 billion (2010) Total equity $46.175 billion (2010) Employees 89,000 (2010) Subsidiaries List of acquisitions Website microsoft.com Microsoft Corporation is an American public multinational corporation headquartered in Redmond, Washington, USA that develops, manufactures, licenses, and supports a wide range of products and services predominantly related to computing through its various product divisions. Established on April 4, 1975 to develop and sell BASIC interpreters for the Altair 8800, Microsoft rose to dominate the home computer operating system (OS) market with MS-DOS in the mid-1980s, followed by the Microsoft Windows line of OSes. Microsoft would also come to dominate the office suite market with Microsoft Office. The company has diversified in recent years into the video game industry with the Xbox and its successor, the Xbox 360 as well as into the consumer electronics market with Zune and the Windows Phone OS.
    [Show full text]
  • IT for Practice 2017
    Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Information Technology for Practice IT for Practice 2017 October 9–10, 2017, Ostrava, Czech Republic Edited by Jan Ministr Milena Tvrdíková Organized by VŠB - Technical University Ostrava, Centre for Information Technology European University Information Systems - CZ IT Cluster Czech Society for System Integration Moravian-Silesian ISBN 978-80-248-4090-1 (pdf on line) ISBN 978-80-248-4089-5 (printed) VŠB - Technical University of Ostrava Centre for Information Technology Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Information Technology for Practice 2017 October 9-10, 2017, Ostrava, Czech Republic ISBN 978-80-248-4090-1 (pdf on-line) ISBN 978-80-248-4089-5 (printed) Sponsors of IT for Practice 2017 European University Information Systems IT Cluster Czech Society for Systems Integration VŠB - Technical University of Ostrava Centre for Information Technology EDITORS Ministr Jan Tvrdíková Milena PROGRAM COMMITTEE AND REVIEWERS CHAIRMAN Milena Tvrdíková Members Caridad y Ocerin José Maria, ES Doucek Petr, CZ Chaplyha Vyacheslav, UA Ivanyshyn Sergey, UA Lula Pawel, PL Marček, Dušan, SK Mahnič Viljan, SI Ministr Jan, CZ Olszak Celina, PL Pitner Tomáš, CZ Ráček Jaroslav, CZ Sláma Michal, CZ Sudzina František, DK Wachowiak Mark, CA Yablotchnikov Sergej RU All published papers have been reviewed by 2 independent reviewers before publishing. The proceedings have not been amended or proofread and editors are not responsible for the language used papers. Copyright Author(s) of each paper. Web addres of the conference proceedings http://www.cssi-morava.cz/new/doc/IT2017/sbornik.pdf FOREWORD Conference on Information Technology for Practice 2017 Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the traditional IT4Practice 2017, a conference with international attendance.
    [Show full text]
  • Article About Placeware
    PlaceWare Article by Mike Hayden, February 28, 1999 Mailto: [email protected] http://www.DocumentationExpress.com Introduction. PlaceWare Inc., recently announced its PlaceWare 3.0 Conference Center software that delivers “live” Internet presentations in real-time to audiences anytime, anywhere. Presenters, without leaving their offices, use the Conference Center and the Web to broadcast just-in-time information and training to participants’ desktops. Web-based, real-time conferencing is becoming an important part of corporate communications. Companies, large and small, use web conferencing to reach customers, prospects, and employees. Web-based conferencing speeds the flow of information while slashing the time and expense of traditional training. With PlaceWare’s browser-based web conferencing, there is no need to deploy 100’s of clients. Conference Center does not require installation of time-consuming downloads. (Other products can require large clients up to 30 MB.) Both presenters and attendees can sign on to a Web Conference in just seconds. Presenters simply type a URL, then drag-n-drop their PowerPointÆ presentation into Conference Center. Participants simply type a URL into their browser. PlaceWare has added many new features as a result of working with their customers. By focusing on ease of use, PlaceWare is in good position to lead the market. PlaceWare’s New Product for Smaller Groups. Conference Center popularized the Auditorium Places software that supports large events, structured interactivity. PlaceWare 3.0 now offers new software called Meeting Places for small events. Here’s how they differ: Auditorium Places is preferred for structured seminars and training because it’s optimized for presenting to groups of up to 1,000.
    [Show full text]
  • Xerox-Analysis.Pdf
    XEROX CORPORATION Rescuing and Revitalizing an American Icon April 17, 2018 Prepared by Icahn Capital LP and Deason Capital Services, LLC Disclaimer SECURITY HOLDERS ARE ADVISED TO READ THE PROXY STATEMENT AND OTHER DOCUMENTS RELATED TO THE SOLICITATION OF PROXIES BY CARL ICAHN, DARWIN DEASON AND THEIR AFFILIATES FROM THE SHAREHOLDERS OF XEROX CORPORATION IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROPOSED TRANSACTIONS BETWEEN XEROX CORPORATION AND FUJIFILM HOLDINGS CORPORATION (THE “TRANSACTION”) AND/OR FOR USE AT THE 2018 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS OF XEROX CORPORATION (THE “ANNUAL MEETING”) WHEN THEY BECOME AVAILABLE BECAUSE THEY WILL CONTAIN IMPORTANT INFORMATION, INCLUDING INFORMATION RELATING TO THE PARTICIPANTS IN SUCH PROXY SOLICITATION. WHEN COMPLETED, A DEFINITIVE PROXY STATEMENT AND A FORM OF PROXY RELATED TO THE TRANSACTION AND/OR THE ANNUAL MEETING WILL BE MAILED TO SHAREHOLDERS OF XEROX CORPORATION AND WILL ALSO BE AVAILABLE AT NO CHARGE AT THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION'S WEBSITE AT http://www.sec.gov/. INFORMATION RELATING TO THE PARTICIPANTS IN SUCH PROXY SOLICITATION IS CONTAINED IN THE SCHEDULE 14A FILED BY CARL ICAHN, DARWIN DEASON AND THEIR RESPECTIVE AFFILIATES WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ON MARCH 14, 2018. THIS PRESENTATION CONTAINS OUR CURRENT VIEWS ON THE HISTORICAL PERFORMANCE OF XEROX AND ITS CURRENT MANAGEMENT AND DIRECTORS, THE VALUE OF XEROX SECURITIES, THE CONSIDERATION TO BE RECEIVED BY XEROX SHAREHOLDERS IN THE TRANSACTION AND CERTAIN ACTIONS THAT XEROX’S BOARD MAY TAKE TO ENHANCE THE VALUE OF ITS SECURITIES. OUR VIEWS ARE BASED ON OUR OWN ANALYSIS OF PUBLICLY AVAILABLE INFORMATION AND ASSUMPTIONS WE BELIEVE TO BE REASONABLE. GIVEN XEROX’S HISTORY OF INADEQUATE PUBLIC DISCLOSURE, THERE CAN BE NO ASSURANCE THAT THE INFORMATION WE CONSIDERED AND ANALYZED IS ACCURATE OR COMPLETE.
    [Show full text]
  • Visualizing the Academic Discipline of Knowledge Management
    sustainability Article Visualizing the Academic Discipline of Knowledge Management Peng Wang 1 ID , Fang-Wei Zhu 1,*, Hao-Yang Song 1, Jian-Hua Hou 2 and Jin-Lan Zhang 1 1 Faculty of Management and Economics, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China; [email protected] (P.W.); [email protected] (H.-Y.S.); [email protected] (J.-L.Z.) 2 Research Center of Science Technology and Society, Dalian University, Dalian 116622, China; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-411-8470-7746 Received: 29 December 2017; Accepted: 18 February 2018; Published: 2 March 2018 Abstract: The aim of this paper was to evaluate the research status of knowledge management (KM) and identify the characteristics of KM in the literature. We selected and studied in detail 7628 original research articles from the Web of Science from 1974 to 2017. Although many studies have contributed to the evolution of the KM domain, our results showed that a comprehensive bibliometric and visualization investigation was required. The literature on KM has grown rapidly since the 1970s. The United States of America, as the original contributing country, has also internationally collaborated the most in this field of study. The National Cheng Kung University has made the highest number of contributions. The majority of authors contributed a small number of publications. Additionally, the most common category in KM research was management. The main publications for KM research include Journal of Knowledge Management, and Knowledge Management Research & Practice. A keywords analysis determined that “knowledge sharing”, “innovation”, “ontology”, and “knowledge management” were consistent hotspots in knowledge management research.
    [Show full text]
  • IVP WEB Printsummary 03012
    ABOUT TEAM PORTFOLIO FOR LIMITED PARTNERS NEWS CONTACT IVP History Institutional Venture Partners (IVP) was founded by Reid Dennis in 1980. IVP was one of the first venture firms on Sand Hill Road, and Reid put IVP on the map by raising the first IVP fund, a $22 million venture capital fund. Over thirty years later, the firm continues to partner with exceptional entrepreneurs to create market leaders for the future. IVP recently raised IVP XIV, a $1 billion later-stage venture capital and growth equity fund, and manages $4 billion in committed capital. IVP HISTORY IVP ADVANTAGE WORKING WITH IVP INVESTMENT CRITERIA CHOOSING A VC ABOUT TEAM PORTFOLIO FOR LIMITED PARTNERS NEWS CONTACT The IVP Advantage Service There are more than 400 venture capital and growth equity firms IVP believes that the most talented management teams deserve an exceptional today managing over $400 billion. Capital is important, but what financial partner. With every investment we make, we enter into a long-term distinguishes top-tier firms today is the expertise of their financial business relationship with the entrepreneurs. IVP helps our companies review key partners and the resources that they provide to help their portfolio business strategies, recruit great executives, and establish strategic partnerships. companies succeed. IVP's partners collectively have more than We assist with all aspects of a company's financial strategy, including future rounds 100 years of venture capital and operating experience. of financings, mergers and acquisitions, and the planning and preparation for an IPO. Perspective IVP HISTORY IVP believes that building differentiated businesses takes time and perseverance.
    [Show full text]
  • Intellectual Property - Strategy and Policy ACIVES
    Intellectual Property - Strategy and Policy ACIVES By Rishi Ahuja B.E., Electronics Engineering University of Pune, 1997 ES Submitted to the System Design and Management Program in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Engineering and Management at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology February 2012 @ 2012 Rishi Ahuja. All rights Reserved The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part in any medium now known or hereafter created. S ig natu re o f A utho r.................................................(..,..... ..................................... Rishi Ahuja System Design and Management Program Ce rtifie d by...................................... ....... ....... .......... /'Joe Hadzima /Senior Lecturer, MIT Entrepreneurship Center Thesis Supervisor Acce pte d by.......................................................... ........... .......... Pat Hale Thesis Supervisor and Director, System Design and Management Program 1 Intellectual Property - Strategy and Policy By Rishi Ahuja B.E., Electronics Engineering University of Pune, 1997 Submitted to the System Design and Management Program in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Engineering and Management Abstract The thesis that follows is an attempt to gain a deeper understanding of intellectual property from a policy as well as a strategic perspective. While the discussion that follows is applicable to intellectual property in general, the focus of this thesis is on a particular aspect of intellectual property i.e patents. Policy and strategic perspectives are covered in section I and 11 respectively. The section on policy explores the origin and evolution of intellectual property related policies by discussing key legislation and court cases.
    [Show full text]