Creating Knowledge Landscapes a Service Oriented Approach to the Implementation of Knowledge Management in the Aviation Industry

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Creating Knowledge Landscapes a Service Oriented Approach to the Implementation of Knowledge Management in the Aviation Industry Creating Knowledge Landscapes A Service Oriented Approach to the Implementation of Knowledge Management in the Aviation Industry Inaugural-Dissertation submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Dr. phil.) to the Faculty of Philosophy, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf by Sascha Rohmen from Düsseldorf, Germany Supervisor: Prof. Wolfgang Stock Düsseldorf, April 2019 D61 I Index Index List of Figures IV List of Tables VI Preface VII Acknowledgements IX 1 Introduction 1 2 Data, Information and Knowledge 12 2.1 Individual Knowledge vs. Collective Knowledge 17 2.2 Explicit Knowledge vs. Implicit Knowledge 17 3 Knowledge Management - Models and Strategies 21 3.1 Managing Knowledge 21 3.2 Knowledge Management Models 24 3.2.1 TOM-Model 25 3.2.2 TIMO-Model 27 3.2.3 Building Blocks of Knowledge Management 27 3.2.4 Harnessing Implicit Knowledge 32 3.2.5 Other Concepts 37 3.3 Knowledge Management Strategies 38 3.3.1 Codification Strategy 40 3.3.2 Personalization Strategy 42 3.3.3 Socialization Strategy 43 3.3.4 Process Oriented Knowledge Management 43 3.3.5 Reasons for a Process Oriented IT Organization 52 3.4 Learning Organization 53 4 Knowledge Management Tools 55 4.1 Involving the Employees – Determination of Information Needs 56 4.2 Supporting Tools and Concepts 71 II Index 4.2.1 Project Management 71 4.2.2 Change Management 77 4.3 Technical Knowledge Management Tools 83 4.3.1 Document Management Systems 84 4.3.2 Content Management Systems 87 4.3.3 Portals and Intranet 88 4.3.4 Knowledge Maps 90 4.3.5 Learning Management Systems 93 4.3.6 Knowledge Management Systems 93 4.3.7 Expert Systems 100 4.3.8 Management Information Systems 101 4.3.9 Information Retrieval Systems and Search Engines 110 4.3.10 Yellow Pages 112 4.3.11 Knowledge Management Apps 113 4.4 Social Knowledge Management Tools 113 4.4.1 Lessons Learned 113 4.4.2 Best Practices 114 4.4.3 Job Rotation 115 4.4.4 Press Reviews 116 4.4.6 Knowledge Cafés 117 4.4.7 Storytelling 118 4.5 Web 2.0 and Social Software 119 4.5.1 Wikis 129 5 (IT) Service Management 141 5.1 Terminology 142 5.2 ITSM 143 5.3 ARIS 143 5.4 ITIL 145 5.4.1 Service Strategy 146 5.4.2 Service Design 153 5.4.3 Service Transition 156 5.4.4 Service Operation 162 III Index 5.4.5 Continual Service Improvement 165 6 First Case Study 169 6.1 Project “Knowledge Management (Conception)” 170 6.2 Project “Implementation of Knowledge Management” 187 6.3 Marketing Knowledge Management 216 6.4 Lessons Learned 219 7 Second Case Study 225 7.1 Law and Rules 228 7.2 Organizational Matters 232 7.3 File and Document Sharing 234 7.4 Quality Management 236 7.5 Information and Knowledge Sharing 238 7.6 Cabin Equipment 239 7.7 A Knowledge Landscape for Social Networks 240 8 Conclusion 246 Bibliography 253 IV List of Figures List of Figures Chapter 1 Ill. 1.1: The Hype Cycle of Knowledge Management 5 Chapter 2 Ill. 2.1: Characters-Data-Information-Knowledge 14 Ill. 2.2: From Data to Knowledge 15 Chapter 3 Ill. 3.1: TOM-Model 25 Ill. 3.2: TIMO-Model 27 Ill. 3.3: Building Blocks of Knowledge Management 28 Ill. 3.4: Knowledge Spiral 36 Ill. 3.5: Fraunhofer Reference Model of Process Oriented Knowledge Management 45 Ill. 3.6: Process Modelling 46 Ill. 3.7: KMDL - Socialization 46 Ill. 3.8: KMDL - Externalization 47 Ill. 3.9: KMDL - Combination 47 Ill. 3.10: KMDL - Internalization 47 Ill. 3.11: Summary of KMDL Objects 48 Ill. 3.12: KMDL Prozesssicht 49 Ill. 3.13: KMDL Aktivitätssicht 50 Chapter 4 Ill. 4.1: Framework for Requirement Engineering 63 Ill. 4.2: Information Need Analysis 65 Ill. 4.3: Project Management Triangle 72 Ill. 4.4: Work Breakdown Structure 74 Ill. 4.5: Milestone Plan 75 Ill. 4.6: Iterative Waterfall Model 77 Ill. 4.7: Main Reasons for the Resistance against Change 79 V List of Figures Ill. 4.8: Knowledge Source Map 90 Ill. 4.9: Knowledge Asset Map 91 Ill. 4.10: Knowledge Structure Diagram 92 Ill. 4.11: Knowledge Application Maps 93 Ill. 4.12: Architecture for Centralized Knowledge Management Systems 97 Ill. 4.13: Architecture of a Peer to Peer Knowledge Management System 99 Ill. 4.14: OLAP Cube 103 Ill. 4.15: Knowledge Warehouse Architecture 109 Ill. 4.16: Boolean Search 111 Ill. 4.17: Comparison of Web 1.0 with Web 2.0 121 Ill. 4.18: Web 2.0 Principles 125 Ill. 4.19: Wiki Template 133 Ill. 4.20: CategoryTree 134 Chapter 5 Ill. 5.1: Service Transition V-Model 159 Chapter 6 Ill. 6.1: Requirements Concerning Content and Design of Knowledge Management 178 Ill. 6.2: Requirements Concerning a Knowledge Management Application 180 Ill. 6.3: Critical Factors 183 Ill. 6.4: Increase of Wiki Pages 198 Ill. 6.5: Number of Page Views 199 Ill. 6.6: Mapping of Knowledge Management Processes with Knowledge Management 204 Tools Ill. 6.7: First Draft of a Knowledge Landscape 211 Ill. 6.8: Knowledge Landscape 216 Chapter 7 Ill. 7.1: Cabin Documentation Process 232 Ill. 7.2: Knowledge Landscape for Social Networking and Collaboration 242 VI List of Tables List of Tables Chapter 1 Table 2.1: Criteria of Information Quality 20 Chapter 3 Table 3.1: Conversion Types in KMDL 53 Chapter 4 Table 4.1: Types of Interviews 67 Table 4.2: Survey of Web 2.0 Tools 122 Chapter 6 Table 6.1: Technical Implementation 192 Table 6.2: Structuring of Contents 193 Table: 6.3: Roll Out and Use of the Wiki 193 Table 6.4: Development of a Knowledge Landscape 194 Table 6.5: Technical Challenges 201 Table 6.6: Survey of Applications 212 Chapter 7 Table 7.1: Survey of Applications 243 Chapter 8 Table 8.1: Steps of a Service Oriented Implementation of Knowledge Management 248 LL t 0≤•¶°£• Knowledge management has undergone several paradigm shifts in the last decades. At first a strong focus was put on the codification of knowledge mostly by means of IT applications. Then new anthropocentric concepts evolved particularly the personalization strategy and socialization strategy which focus on human interaction and social networks. In many cases a reasonable combination of these strategies was neglected in the past, thus impairing the effectiveness of knowledge management. In addition, a common agreement on scientific terminology and technical vocabulary with regard to knowledge management still needs to be developed. Implementation failures due to a false understanding of knowledge management and exaggerated expectations have led to disillusionment in some cases. As a consequence knowledge management may face acceptance problems. The goal of this work is to provide knowledge managers with arguments in favor of knowledge management and respective systems. Both management and employees of a company need to be convinced of the manifold benefits and added values of knowledge management for a successful implementation. In order to achieve this, the following main theses have been postulated: 1. Service management, and in particular IT service management concepts as found, for instance, in ITIL (Information Technology Infrastructure Library), have the potential to increase the acceptance of knowledge management measures significantly, especially when applied from the beginning of the implementation process. 2. Especially in larger organizations with many different applications and complex processes a so-called knowledge landscape, as has been developed in the first case study of this work, can serve as an orientation guide and help with the directing of knowledge flows and the identification of appropriate tools for specific types of knowledge. A knowledge landscape provides orientation and, thus, helps to improve acceptance of knowledge management tools. The theses are proved in two case studies, both in the aviation industry. First, however, general concepts are explained. In chapter two the terminology is defined. Data, information and knowledge are defined according to a business studies approach and according to the information science approach. A distinction is made between individual and collective knowledge and between explicit and implict knowledge. Further dimensions of knowledge are introduced such as criticality or confidentiality, for example. Chapter three is about different concepts, methods and strategies of knowledge management. A widely renowed concept is that of Probst, Raub and Romhardt who have defined eight building blocks of successful knowledge management (Probst et al. 2006). Nonaka and Takeuchi have developed another concept of a so-called knowledge spirale that explains the generation of knowledge (Nonaka & Takeuchi, 1997). Among the strategies that are introduced there are the aforementioned codification strategy, the personalization strategy, the socialization strategy and process based knowledge management. LLL t Chapter four introduces a number of different knowledge management tools, distinguishing between technical and social tools. Further supporting tools are project management and change management. Besides, the concept of Web 2.0 is explained in detail. The focus in this context is on wikis because the first case study is about the implementation of a wiki as knowledge management tool. (IT) Service management is explained in chapter five. The focus is on ITIL, a collection of best practices. These include concepts such as demand management, access management, event, incident and problem management, change management, first level support and other measures of IT service management which have been applied in the first case study. This case study is about the implementation of knowledge management and of a wiki as the core of the knowledge management IT landscape.
Recommended publications
  • Knowledge Markets: Cooperation Among Distributed Technical Specialists
    Knowledge Markets: Cooperation Among Distributed Technical Specialists Steve Sawyer, [email protected] Kristin Eschenfelder, [email protected] Robert Heckman, [email protected] Syracuse University School of Information Studies Syracuse New York, 13244 a slightly modified version of this paper appears as: Sawyer, S., Eschenfelder, K. and Heckman, R. (2000), “Knowledge Markets: Cooperation Among Distributed Technical Specialists,” in Srikantiah, K. and Koenig, M. (Eds.) Knowledge Management for Information Professionals, Medford, NJ: Information Today, pp. 181-204. v. 4.1 as of 30 October, 1998 KEYWORDS: Knowledge Management; Knowledge Markets; Distributed Computing; Work Cultures; Social Exchange Theory; Technical Support Specialists 1 Knowledge Markets: Cooperation Among Distributed Technical Specialists Abstract Knowledge management issues are highlighted when organizational functions are decentralized. For example, distributed computing environments place more computer power in the hands of the end-user, and often demand increased technical support. In response, organizations may choose to move technical support personnel close to end- users. This can isolate them from each other, and may limit their ability to share knowledge. Thus, the growth of distributed computing calls for an increased ability to share knowledge across organizational boundaries. In that context, this paper presents the results of a case study investigating the roles of knowledge markets among distributed technologists. Our perspective is that knowledge markets are cultural entities shaped by the underlying work culture of their participants, and that the cultural forces that define knowledge markets are powerful, deeply held and difficult to change. Thus, improving the effectiveness of any given knowledge market will have less to do with the installation of information technology than with the ability to create a facilitating work culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Visualizing the Academic Discipline of Knowledge Management
    sustainability Article Visualizing the Academic Discipline of Knowledge Management Peng Wang 1 ID , Fang-Wei Zhu 1,*, Hao-Yang Song 1, Jian-Hua Hou 2 and Jin-Lan Zhang 1 1 Faculty of Management and Economics, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China; [email protected] (P.W.); [email protected] (H.-Y.S.); [email protected] (J.-L.Z.) 2 Research Center of Science Technology and Society, Dalian University, Dalian 116622, China; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-411-8470-7746 Received: 29 December 2017; Accepted: 18 February 2018; Published: 2 March 2018 Abstract: The aim of this paper was to evaluate the research status of knowledge management (KM) and identify the characteristics of KM in the literature. We selected and studied in detail 7628 original research articles from the Web of Science from 1974 to 2017. Although many studies have contributed to the evolution of the KM domain, our results showed that a comprehensive bibliometric and visualization investigation was required. The literature on KM has grown rapidly since the 1970s. The United States of America, as the original contributing country, has also internationally collaborated the most in this field of study. The National Cheng Kung University has made the highest number of contributions. The majority of authors contributed a small number of publications. Additionally, the most common category in KM research was management. The main publications for KM research include Journal of Knowledge Management, and Knowledge Management Research & Practice. A keywords analysis determined that “knowledge sharing”, “innovation”, “ontology”, and “knowledge management” were consistent hotspots in knowledge management research.
    [Show full text]
  • Knowledge Markets: More Than Providers and Users
    Knowledge Markets: More than Providers and Users Simard, Albert Similarly, to remain relevant, governments must Abstract— This paper describes a knowledge- be able to create, use, and disseminate market model intended to facilitate transforming information and knowledge in social domains science-based departments to a service such as health care, education, and national perspective. Existing provider / user models mask security [9,10]. Thus, creating and using the true complexity of knowledge services. The proposed model comprises nine stages that knowledge will be central to continuing success embed, advance, or extract value. Model design in the 21st century, in both the private and public criteria include independence from content, an sector. organizational focus, scalability, two drivers, and The Government of Canada attaches a high two levels of resolution. A task group, combining importance to the knowledge economy [11]. 190 years of scientific experience and tacit Further, the amount of science conducted by the knowledge, explored the nature of knowledge Government of Canada is substantial. In 2003– services and discovered patterns to understand underlying processes. The paper concludes that a 2004, the Federal Government spent $4.6 billion cyclic value-chain-based knowledge-market model on its science and technology activities [12]. This is richer than existing models, it supports both sum represents the cost of generating supply and demand approaches to knowledge knowledge. Realizing a return on this markets, and it describes knowledge services considerable investment requires that the adequately to enable eventual measurement and knowledge be used to benefit the government, management. the society, and the citizens it serves. Index Terms— knowledge organization, knowledge services, knowledge markets, knowledge transfer, value chains, providers, users 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Knowledge Market 5.1 a Knowledge Market Is a Mechanism For
    Page 1 of 6 Knowledge market 5.1 A knowledge market is a mechanism for distributing knowledge resources. There are two views on knowledge and how knowledge markets can function. One view uses a legal construct of intellectual property to make knowledge a typical scarce resource, so the traditional commodity market mechanism can be applied directly to distribute it. An alternative model is based on treating knowledge as a public good and hence encouraging free sharing of knowledge. This is often referred to as attention economy. Currently there is no consensus among researchers on relative merits of these two approaches. History A knowledge economy include the concept of exchanging knowledge-based products and services. However, as discussed by Stewart (1996) knowledge is very different from physical products. For example, it can be in more than one place at one time, selling it does not diminish the supply, buyers only purchase it once, and once sold, it cannot be recalled. Further, knowledge begets more knowledge in a never-ending cycle. Understanding of knowledge markets is beginning to emerge. As would be expected, they are very different in form from traditional markets. Knowledge markets have been variously described by Stewart (1996) and Simard (2000) as a mechanism for enabling, supporting, and facilitating the mobilization, sharing, or exchange of information and knowledge among providers and users. This transactional approach assumes that knowledge-based products or services are available for distribution, that someone wants to use them, and that the primary focus of the market is to connect the two. This perspective is appropriate when the market has limited or no interest or control over either the production or use of the content being exchanged, as is the case for most traditional markets.
    [Show full text]
  • The Knowledge Web Michael B
    United States Education & Training Services Knowledge Enterprises 23 May 2000 (Reprint) Michael T. Moe, CFA Henry Blodget The Knowledge Web Michael B. Armstrong Kathleen Bailey Neil Godsey Chandy Smith Part 4: Corporate e-Learning – Feeding Hungry Minds Thatcher Thompson Scott Wilson Highlights: $300 Billion Market Catalyzed by the Internet Continuous Learning Required by the New Economy is Driving Huge and Rapidly Growing Market Merrill Lynch & Co. Global Securities Research & Economics Group Global Fundamental Equity Research Department RC#60227210 The Knowledge Web – 23 May 2000 (Reprint) Knowledge Enterprises Group Michael T. Moe, CFA Director of Global Growth Research (1) 415 676-3570 [email protected] Education Services & Knowledge Enterprises Business & Employee Services Kathleen Bailey Thatcher Thompson Vice President Director (1) 415 676-3572 (1) 212 449-8787 [email protected] [email protected] Scott Wilson Chandy Smith Vice President Assistant Vice President (1) 415 676-3541 (1) 212 449-0841 [email protected] [email protected] Global Internet Research Neil Godsey Assistant Vice President (1) 415 676-3574 Henry Blodget [email protected] Senior Internet Analyst, Global Coordinator (1) 212 449-0773 Michael B. Armstrong [email protected] Industry Analyst (1) 415 676-3585 Kirsten Campbell [email protected] Assistant Vice President (1) 212 449-3113 [email protected] "Albert Einstein"™ Licensed by the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Represented by the Roger Richman Agency, Inc., Beverly Hills, CA 90212 www.albert-einstein.net" 2 The Knowledge Web – 23 May 2000 (Reprint) Introduction to the e-Knowledge Industry The new economy moves at a pace never seen before. The new providing continuing education, employment opportunities economy is a knowledge economy based on brainpower, ideas and relevant information, will be knowledge nerve centers and entrepreneurism.
    [Show full text]
  • Process Model for Knowledge Management Shekar Sivasubramanian CMU-LTI-16-003
    Process Model for Knowledge Management Shekar Sivasubramanian CMU-LTI-16-003 Language Technologies Institute School of Computer Science Carnegie Mellon University 5000 Forbes Ave., Pittsburgh, PA 15213 www.lti.cs.cmu.edu Thesis Committee: Dr. Eric Nyberg (Chair) Dr. Jamie Callan Dr. Robert Frederking Kiran Hosakote Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy In Language and Information Technologies © 2016, Shekar Sivasubramanian Process Model for Knowledge Management Table of Contents CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION .................................................................................... 1 OVERVIEW ........................................................................................................................ 1 MODELS IN KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT ......................................................................... 1 General Models ............................................................................................................ 1 Maturity Models ........................................................................................................... 5 Proposed Process Model for Knowledge Management ............................................. 13 CHAPTER 2: THE PROCESS MODEL ...................................................................... 23 KEY PROCESS AREAS ..................................................................................................... 23 LEVEL 2 KEY PROCESS AREAS ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Barter - Mechanism Design of a Market-Incented Wisdom Exchange for Organizations and Communities
    Barter - Mechanism Design of A Market-incented Wisdom Exchange for Organizations and Communities Dawei Shen Marshall Van Alstyne Andrew Lippman Media Laboratory Center for Digital Business Media Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology Technology Technology [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT been promoted both by researchers in academia and by in- We are exploring the design and creation of information mar- dustry leaders in practice [2]. Firm managers often ap- kets with a goal of bringing an electronic, distributed market preciate the critical role of knowledge management systems to a community or an organization to enhance knowledge in retaining employees' knowledge, encouraging information sharing, innovation creation, and productivity. We apply sharing and innovation creation, and enhancing work pro- innovative market mechanisms to construct incentives while ductivity, usually through the usage of `Enterprise Web 2.0' still encouraging pro-social behaviors. A key advantage of platforms. However, a discouraging fact is that more than this study will be a direct appeal to information economic 70% of KMS initiatives among U.S. organizations are under- theories and market principles on information markets de- performing mainly because of the adoption problem [12]. An sign. A web-based software platform called Barter is devel- important reason for the failure is that the incentive struc- oped and deployed at several university sites. User data have ture has not been designed and constructed properly. Mem- been collected and analyzed to test the effectiveness of an bers of an organization, e.g. firm employees, lack the incen- information market and its various forces.
    [Show full text]