How Did Germany Survive 1923? the Response of Many German People to This Economic Chaos Was the Same As It Had Been to the Treaty of Versailles

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

How Did Germany Survive 1923? the Response of Many German People to This Economic Chaos Was the Same As It Had Been to the Treaty of Versailles Revision for Spring Mocks 2019 Germany (Paper 3) How did Germany survive 1923? The response of many German people to this economic chaos was the same as it had been to the Treaty of Versailles. They didn’t blame the Kaiser (who had started the war) or the Allies (who had forced the German government to agree to the Treaty) or the French (who had actually invaded the Ruhr)—they blamed the Weimar government. If democracy was to survive, action was needed. The man who stepped in to save the day was a man called Gustav Stresemann, a member of the DVP - a centre-right political party, who became Chancellor in August 1923. He acted quickly and called off the policy of passive resistance and visited France to tell the French government that he was prepared to work with them to resume reparation repayments. He also scrapped the old worthless money and introduced a new, temporary currency called the rentenmark. By strictly limiting the amount of this currency in circulation, the value of German money was stabilised, bringing hyperinflation under control. Within the year a new permanent currency called the Reichsmark was brought in. Because of Stresemann, Germany had survived its first major economic crisis but there was a cost. Many right-wing extremists were furious that once again Germany had given in to the French. Another humiliation by the Weimar government and within the year a small right wing group - the NSDAP which was led by Adolf Hitler - made its first attempt to seize power in Munich, in November 1923. The attempted Putsch failed but it was a sign that the extreme-right wing was not going to just disappear. The Golden Years of the Weimar Republic—1924-1929 Although he had managed to tackle the inflation problem, Gustav Stresemann was not popular with many people. He was too right wing for the Left and too left wing for the Right. This resulted in his removal as Chancellor in 1924. However his skills were recognised and he was a member of every government from 1923 and 1929. From 1924 to 1929 he held the post of Foreign Minister. For this reason the years 1924-1929 are often referred to as the Stresemann Era. 1 The Dawes Plan 1924 and The Locarno Treaties 1925 The German recovery continued ​ in 1924 because of a deal Stresemann brokered with the French, British and Americans. Under The Dawes Plan of 1924, Germany was given longer to pay reparations so would be able to pay lower reparation payments. Germany agreed to pay as much as it could each year, starting with 1,000 million marks. As part of the deal, America agreed to lend Germany 800 million marks to get the plan started. This money was used to kick start the stagnant German economy. As Germany recovered from the crisis, more people from all social classes began to support their government. The next success for Stresemann was the Locarno Pact of ​ 1925. In a series of ​ treaties, the Germans promised to accept the land and border changes which had been made by the Treaty of Versailles. As a result of Stresemann’s cooperative stance Germany was, in 1926, at last invited to join the League of Nations Its status as a great power was also recognised as it was given a permanent seat on the League’s Council, alongside Britain and France. Finally in 1929, the Young Plan was ​ ​ ​ agreed. This greatly reduced the amount of money Germany had to pay as reparations and gave Germany longer to pay. As a result of this deal, Allied troops finally withdrew from the Rhineland. 2 Did all of this make the German people happy? Most Germans were pleased but a hard core of extremists weren’t happy because Stresemann had cooperated with the Allies rather than seeking revenge for the humiliation of the Treaty. They didn’t understand that Stresemann had recognised the fact that the only way in which the Allies would ever have agreed to change the terms of the Treaty, was if they could be made to trust Germany. Between 1924 and 1929 Stresemann had succeeded in winning the trust of the Allies and had therefore been able to negotiate concessions on the Treaty and ended the likelihood of future conflict. A New President 1925 The Weimar Constitution stated that there should be an election for President every 7 years. In 1925 Ebert’s tenure came to an end and in the following election, General Paul von Hindenburg was elected President. This was very worrying for supporters of democracy in Germany. Although he was respected and trusted by the German people Hindenburg had always been a critic of democracy and the Weimar system. Before he took office, he had even written to his old friend, Kaiser Wilhelm II, to ask his permission to stand for election! The fact that this critic of democracy had been elected President suggests that support for the pro-democracy Weimar parties was getting weaker; Hindenburg represented the old Germany of the Kaiser, not the new Weimar Germany of the Social Democrats. Economic Success and Political Stability Despite the election of Hindenburg as President, by the late 1920s, Weimar Germany seemed relatively stable. The reason for this was Germany’s economic revival. The 800 million marks loan from America, which had been part of the Dawes Plan, was invested in industry and commerce. Following America’s lead, foreign banks were also happy to lend money to German businessmen and farmers to invest in new equipment and premises; 25,000 million gold marks entered the German economy this way. 3 By 1930, Germany had become was one of the world’s leading exporters of consumer goods. 3 million new homes had been built, along with factories, public facilities, roads, railways, airships, ocean liners, film studios etc. Germany seemed like the most modern and prosperous country in the world outside the USA. The Dawes Plan had saved Germany from economic collapse and provided a kickstart to an economic recovery. One major advantage of the improved German economy was that there was a decline in support for extremist parties like the Nazis. Nazi representation in the Reichstag went from a high of 32 seats in 1924 to just 12 in 1928. Likewise, support for the Communists declined, though not as much. The message was clear: economic success led to political stability and to a decline in support for the extreme parties like the Nazis and the Communists. Warning signs for the future All of this was very exciting. However, there were very serious weaknesses threatening the long term success of the German economy: ● Germany was dependent on American and foreign loans which could be withdrawn at any time and too big a percentage of its income came from exports. ● Unemployment remained a serious problem; the Weimar economy wasn’t providing enough jobs for Germany’s rising population. ● Farming never really recovered to its pre-war situation and income from agriculture actually fell between 1925 and 1929; farm workers in 1929 were earning little more than half the national average. ● There were extremes of wealth and poverty in Germany; economic power was still mainly in the hands of just a few very wealthy industrialists who ran more than half-Germany’s industry. 4 Was Weimar Germany a beautiful house built on shaky foundations? All of this meant was that the future of Weimar Germany was far from secure. Most of the very rich, the very poor and the farmers of Germany remained unimpressed by the Weimar government. Also, because Germany’s economic success was almost totally dependant on foreign investment and exports (mainly to America), if anything happened to the American economy then the German economy would collapse. Metaphorically if America were to sneeze, Germany would be very likely to catch a fatal cold! Stresemann himself knew this: Another warning sign for the future…. Between 1919 and 1933, no single party ever won a majority of seats in the Reichstag. Although the Social Democrats always won the most votes - and were by far the most popular political party - they never won enough seats to form a government on their own. Indeed between 1923 and 1928 they didn’t take part in any of the ruling coalitions. All Weimar governments were coalitions—parties working together—and these coalitions had a horrible habit of breaking down nearly as quickly as they were formed. In the 14 years of the Weimar Republic, there were 25 separate governments; some governments only lasted a matter of weeks. The only consistent feature of government at this time was Stresemann’s role as Foreign Minister. What would happen if there was a crisis and Stresemann wasn’t around to find a solution? Germany was about to find out! The Rise of the Hitler and the Nazis 1919-1933 ​ The Nazi party was founded in Munich in 1919 by Anton Drexler NOT ​ ​ ​ Adolf Hitler. It was originally called the DAP (German Workers Party; it ​ ​ later became the National Socialist Workers party or Nazis. Before Hitler joined, it had less than 50 members, hardly any money, no party programme, no leaflets, no posters – not even the swastika symbol. In 1921, Hitler replaced Drexler as the leader. ​ 5 Nazi Policies - The 25 Point Programme Hitler and Drexler wrote The 25-point Programme which stated the party’s 3 ​ ​ ​ ​ main policies. Anti-Semitism – This is a hatred of Jewish people and the belief ​ ​ that the Jews are to blame for many national and international problems.The Nazis said the Jewish people were the lowest race of people in the world and that if you were Jewish, you weren’t a German citizen.Jews were blamed for all of Germany’s problems, including the First World War.
Recommended publications
  • Uncertainty and Hyperinflation: European Inflation Dynamics After World War I
    FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF SAN FRANCISCO WORKING PAPER SERIES Uncertainty and Hyperinflation: European Inflation Dynamics after World War I Jose A. Lopez Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Kris James Mitchener Santa Clara University CAGE, CEPR, CES-ifo & NBER June 2018 Working Paper 2018-06 https://www.frbsf.org/economic-research/publications/working-papers/2018/06/ Suggested citation: Lopez, Jose A., Kris James Mitchener. 2018. “Uncertainty and Hyperinflation: European Inflation Dynamics after World War I,” Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Working Paper 2018-06. https://doi.org/10.24148/wp2018-06 The views in this paper are solely the responsibility of the authors and should not be interpreted as reflecting the views of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco or the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Uncertainty and Hyperinflation: European Inflation Dynamics after World War I Jose A. Lopez Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Kris James Mitchener Santa Clara University CAGE, CEPR, CES-ifo & NBER* May 9, 2018 ABSTRACT. Fiscal deficits, elevated debt-to-GDP ratios, and high inflation rates suggest hyperinflation could have potentially emerged in many European countries after World War I. We demonstrate that economic policy uncertainty was instrumental in pushing a subset of European countries into hyperinflation shortly after the end of the war. Germany, Austria, Poland, and Hungary (GAPH) suffered from frequent uncertainty shocks – and correspondingly high levels of uncertainty – caused by protracted political negotiations over reparations payments, the apportionment of the Austro-Hungarian debt, and border disputes. In contrast, other European countries exhibited lower levels of measured uncertainty between 1919 and 1925, allowing them more capacity with which to implement credible commitments to their fiscal and monetary policies.
    [Show full text]
  • Records of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, 1891-1957, Record Group 85 New Orleans, Louisiana Crew Lists of Vessels Arriving at New Orleans, LA, 1910-1945
    Records of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, 1891-1957, Record Group 85 New Orleans, Louisiana Crew Lists of Vessels Arriving at New Orleans, LA, 1910-1945. T939. 311 rolls. (~A complete list of rolls has been added.) Roll Volumes Dates 1 1-3 January-June, 1910 2 4-5 July-October, 1910 3 6-7 November, 1910-February, 1911 4 8-9 March-June, 1911 5 10-11 July-October, 1911 6 12-13 November, 1911-February, 1912 7 14-15 March-June, 1912 8 16-17 July-October, 1912 9 18-19 November, 1912-February, 1913 10 20-21 March-June, 1913 11 22-23 July-October, 1913 12 24-25 November, 1913-February, 1914 13 26 March-April, 1914 14 27 May-June, 1914 15 28-29 July-October, 1914 16 30-31 November, 1914-February, 1915 17 32 March-April, 1915 18 33 May-June, 1915 19 34-35 July-October, 1915 20 36-37 November, 1915-February, 1916 21 38-39 March-June, 1916 22 40-41 July-October, 1916 23 42-43 November, 1916-February, 1917 24 44 March-April, 1917 25 45 May-June, 1917 26 46 July-August, 1917 27 47 September-October, 1917 28 48 November-December, 1917 29 49-50 Jan. 1-Mar. 15, 1918 30 51-53 Mar. 16-Apr. 30, 1918 31 56-59 June 1-Aug. 15, 1918 32 60-64 Aug. 16-0ct. 31, 1918 33 65-69 Nov. 1', 1918-Jan. 15, 1919 34 70-73 Jan. 16-Mar. 31, 1919 35 74-77 April-May, 1919 36 78-79 June-July, 1919 37 80-81 August-September, 1919 38 82-83 October-November, 1919 39 84-85 December, 1919-January, 1920 40 86-87 February-March, 1920 41 88-89 April-May, 1920 42 90 June, 1920 43 91 July, 1920 44 92 August, 1920 45 93 September, 1920 46 94 October, 1920 47 95-96 November, 1920 48 97-98 December, 1920 49 99-100 Jan.
    [Show full text]
  • JOHNSTOWN V. the NEGRO: SOUTHERN MIGRANTS and the EXODUS of 1923
    JOHNSTOWN v. THE NEGRO: SOUTHERN MIGRANTS AND THE EXODUS OF 1923 BY RICHARD B. SHERMAN* ONE of the most significant demographic changes in American history was the vast migration of Southern Negroes to the North during and shortly after the First World War. Within a period of a few years hundreds of thousands of Negroes found opportunities in the North that heretofore had been denied to them. However, the migration also made clearer than ever before the national character of American racial problems. Particularly in the early stages, it meant that an economically and culturally oppressed minority was placed in sharp and unaccustomed contact with people in Northern communities who were unprepared for the change. This process provided a dramatic test of the devotion of Americans to their ideals of freedom and equality. In some areas there were heartening instances of successful adjustment. But there were also dismaying failures. An example of the latter was provided during the early 1920's by Johnstown, Pennsylvania, where community apathy and demagogic leadership resulted in misfortune for many of the newcomers. From 1915 through the 1920's the Negro's northward migration came in two main phases, and Johnstown was affected by both. The first phase reached a peak between 1916 and 1917, and then sharply declined for a few years. A second phase was under way by 1922 and culminated the next year. Prompted by economic and social oppression in the South, and lured by the opportunities presented by labor shortages in the North, vast numbers of Negroes moved off the land, to the cities, and into the North.] *Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Economic Conditions, 1924-1933
    This PDF is a selection from an out-of-print volume from the National Bureau of Economic Research Volume Title: German Business Cycles, 1924-1933 Volume Author/Editor: Carl T. Schmidt Volume Publisher: NBER Volume ISBN: 0-87014-024-8 Volume URL: http://www.nber.org/books/schm34-1 Publication Date: 1934 Chapter Title: Review of Economic Conditions, 1924-1933 Chapter Author: Carl T. Schmidt Chapter URL: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c4934 Chapter pages in book: (p. 25 - 114) CHAPTER TWO REVIEW OF ECONOMIC CONDITIONS, 1924—1933 A. The Course of the Post-Inflation Business Cycles 1.DEPRESSION,HALTING REVIVAL, DEFINITE RECOVERY, 1924-1925 Thestabilization of German currency tore aside the dense veil of paper marks that had obscured the Various business journals, monographs and official reports constitute the source for the materials presented in Part A. Particularly suggestive were Reports of the Agent General for Reparation Payments, 1925—30 (Berlin,1925—30); James W. Angell, The Recovery of Germany; Institut für Konjunkturforschung, Vierteljahrshefte zur Konjunkturforschung, \'ols. '—7 (Reimar Hobbing, Berlin, 1926—32); Fritz Naphtaii, Abbau und Aufbau: Rückblick auf das Wirtschaftsjahr 1925 So- cietats-Druckerei, Frankfurt a.M., 1926); Reichskreditgesellschaft, A-G., Germany's Economic Development, semi-annual analyses, 1926—32 (Ber- lin, 1926—32); C. L. Roedler, Grundzuge der deutschen K,onjunhturbeweg- ung, 1920—25(Frankfurta.M., 1926); Erich Welter, Wachstum: Die deutsche Wirtschaft im Jahre 1927; and Stockung: Die Wirt- schaft im Jahre 1929(FrankfurterSocietäts-Druckerei, Frankfurt a.M., 1928 and 1930); also Dreifache Krise... (Societäts-Verlag,Frankfurt a.M., 1931). 25] features of German economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Germany 1919-1941 U.S
    U.S. MILITARY INTELLIGENCE REPORTS : GERMANY 1919-1941 U.S. MILITARY INTELLIGENCE REPORTS: GERMANY, 1919-1941 Edited by Dale Reynolds Guide Compiled by Robert Lester A Microfilm Project of UNIVERSITY PUBLICATIONS OF AMERICA, INC. 44 North Market Street • Frederick, MD 21701 Copyright© 1983 by University Publications of America, Inc. All rights reserved. ISBN 0-89093^26-6. Note on Sources The Documents in this Collection are from the National Archives and Record Service, Washington, D.C., Record Group #165. Mil- itary Intelligence Division Files: Germany. TABLE OF CONTENTS Red Index 1 Reel I 1 Reel II 6 Reel III 10 Reel IV 15 Reel V 18 Reel VI 22 Reel VII 25 Reel VIII 29 Reel IX 31 Reel X 33 Reel XI 33 Reel XII 34 Reel XIII 35 Reel XIV 38 Reel XV 39 Reel XVI 41 Reel XVII 43 Reel XVIII 45 Reel XIX 47 Reel XX 49 Reel XXI 52 Reel XXII 54 Reel XXIII 56 Reel XXIV 58 Reel XXV 61 Reel XXVI 63 Reel XXVII 65 Reel XXVIII 68 Subject Index 71 Dates to Remember February 3,1917 Severance of U.S. Diplomatic Relations with Germany; Declara- tion of War November 11,1918 Armistice December 1, 1918 U.S. Troops of the 3rd Army cross the Rhine and Occupy the Rhine Province July 2,1919 Departure of the U.S. 3rd Army; the U.S. Army of the Rhine Occupies Coblenz in the Rhine Province December 10, 1921 Presentation of Credentials of the U.S. Charge d'Affaires in Berlin April 22, 1922 Withdrawal of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ends of Four Big Inflations
    This PDF is a selection from an out-of-print volume from the National Bureau of Economic Research Volume Title: Inflation: Causes and Effects Volume Author/Editor: Robert E. Hall Volume Publisher: University of Chicago Press Volume ISBN: 0-226-31323-9 Volume URL: http://www.nber.org/books/hall82-1 Publication Date: 1982 Chapter Title: The Ends of Four Big Inflations Chapter Author: Thomas J. Sargent Chapter URL: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c11452 Chapter pages in book: (p. 41 - 98) The Ends of Four Big Inflations Thomas J. Sargent 2.1 Introduction Since the middle 1960s, many Western economies have experienced persistent and growing rates of inflation. Some prominent economists and statesmen have become convinced that this inflation has a stubborn, self-sustaining momentum and that either it simply is not susceptible to cure by conventional measures of monetary and fiscal restraint or, in terms of the consequent widespread and sustained unemployment, the cost of eradicating inflation by monetary and fiscal measures would be prohibitively high. It is often claimed that there is an underlying rate of inflation which responds slowly, if at all, to restrictive monetary and fiscal measures.1 Evidently, this underlying rate of inflation is the rate of inflation that firms and workers have come to expect will prevail in the future. There is momentum in this process because firms and workers supposedly form their expectations by extrapolating past rates of inflation into the future. If this is true, the years from the middle 1960s to the early 1980s have left firms and workers with a legacy of high expected rates of inflation which promise to respond only slowly, if at all, to restrictive monetary and fiscal policy actions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of the Nazis Revision Guide
    Rise of the Nazis Revision Guide Name: Key Topics 1. The Nazis in the 1920s 2. Hitler becomes Chancellor, 1933 3. Hitler becomes Dictator, 1934 @mrthorntonteach Hitler and the early Nazi Party The roots of the Nazi party start in 1889, with the birth of Adolf Hitler but the political beginnings of the party start in 1919 with the set up of the German Workers Party, the DAP. This party was one of the many new parties that set up in the political chaos after the First World War and it was the joining of Adolf Hitler that changed Germanys future forever. The early life of Hitler Hitler wanted to In 1913, he moved to Hitler was shocked by become an artists but Munich and became Germanys defeat in WWI was rejected by the obsessed with all things and blamed the Weimar Vienna Art School German Republic Hitler was born Between 1908- He fought in the First In 1919, Hitler begins to spy in Austria in 13, he was World War, winning the on the German Workers 1889 to an homeless and Iron Cross but was Party (DAP) but then joins abusive father. sold paintings wounded by gas in 1918 the party, soon taking over. Who were the DAP? The DAP were national socialists: The German Workers Party Nationalists – believed that all policies should should (DAP) was set up by Anton be organised to make the nation stronger Drexler in 1919 in Munich. Socialists – believed that the country's land, industry At first there were only a small and wealth should below to the workers.
    [Show full text]
  • 1923-1925 Index to Parliamentary Debates
    LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Twenty-third Parliament 10 July 1923 – 27 October 1925 Queensland Parliamentary Debates INDEX Contents of this document * 23rd Parliament, 1st Session 10 July 1923 – 2 November 1923 Index from Hansard, V.141-142, 1923 23rd Parliament, 2nd Session 29 July 1924 – 22 October 1924 Index from Hansard, V.143-144, 1924 23rd Parliament, 3rd Session 28 July 1925 – 27 October 1925 Index from Hansard, V.145-146, 1925 *The Index from each volume of Hansard corresponds with a Parliamentary Session. This document contains a list of page numbers of the daily proceedings for the Legislative Assembly as printed in the corresponding Hansard volume. A list of page numbers at the start of each printed index is provided to allow the reader to find the electronic copy in the online calendar by clicking on the date of the proceedings and then to a link to the pdf. LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Twenty-third Parliament – First Session Queensland Parliamentary Debates, V.141-142, 1923 10 July 1923 – 2 November 1923 (Theodore Government) INDEX PAGE NOS DATE PAGE NOS DATE 1-4 10 July 1923 762-784 31 August 1923 4-15 11 July 1923 784-823 4 September 1923 16-51 12 July 1923 823-864 5 September 1923 51-90 17 July 1923 864-902 6 September 1923 90-130 18 July 1923 903-942 7 September 1923 130-178 19 July 1923 942-979 11 September 1923 178-214 24 July 1923 979-1018 12 September 1923 214-251 25 July 1923 1018-1060 13 September 1923 252-286 26 July 1923 1060-1095 14 September 1923 286-319 31 July 1923 1096-1134 18 September 1923 319-353 1 August 1923 1135-1164
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report of the Colonies, Gold Coast, 1923-24
    COLONIAL REPORTS—ANNUAL. No. 1255. GOLD COAST. REPORT FOR 1923-24. (For Report for 1922^-1923 see No. 1207.) Printed in the Gold Coast Colony. LONDON: PUBLISHED BY HIS MAJKSTY'8 STATIONERY OFFICE. be purchased directly from H.M. STATIONERY OFFICE at the following addresses: Adastral House, Kingsway, London, W.C.2; 28, Abingdon Stroet, London, S.W.1; York Street, Manchester; 1, St. Andrew's Crescent, Cardiff; or 120, George Street, Edinburgh; or through any Bookseller. 1925.' prjcp'2s; 3d.*net;,, » 4 « • * » » # CONTENTS. CHAPTER. I.— GENERAL • • • • II.—FINANCIAL • • • • III.—TRADE • • • • IV.—LEGISLATION • * • * V.—AGRICULTURE • • 4 • • • • • VI.—VETERINARY • • • • • • VII.—EDUCATION .. • • • • • • • • VIII.—GOVERNMENT INSTITUTIONS • • • • IX.—VITAL STATISTICS .. • • • • X.—POLICE «• • i • • ••• XL—PRISONS • • • • XIL— POSTAL TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE SERVICE XIIL—RAILWAYS .. • • • • XIV.—HARBOUR WORKS .. • • • • XV.—PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT XVL—TRANSPORT «• • • XVIL—GEOLOGICAL SURVEY • * * • XVIII.—MINES • • •• »• XIX.—SURVEY XX.—IMPERIAL INSTITUTE • » • » I • —"GENERAL* Administration. The Government of the Colony was administered during the Financial Year by Dr. J. C. Maxwell, C.M.G., Colonial Secretary, from 2nd April, 1923, to 17th August, 1923 ; and by Mr. A. J. Philbrick, C.B.E., Chief Commissioner of the Northern Territories from the 18th August, 1923, to 1st October, 1923 ; The Governor and Commander in Chief, Brigadier General Sir F. Gordon Guggisberg, K.CM.G,, D.S.O., returned from leave on the 2nd October, 1923, and resumed the administration of the Government until the 30th March, 1924. Honours. Companionship of the Most Distinguished Order of Saint Michael and Saint George was conferred by His Majesty the King upon Dr. David Alexander, Director of Medical and Sanitary Services.
    [Show full text]
  • The Deutschnationale Volkspartei and the Dawes Plan, 1923--1924
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 1978 The Deutschnationale Volkspartei and the Dawes Plan, 1923--1924 William Phillip Bradley College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the European History Commons, and the International Relations Commons Recommended Citation Bradley, William Phillip, "The Deutschnationale Volkspartei and the Dawes Plan, 1923--1924" (1978). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539625032. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-7g65-w364 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE DEUTSCHNATIONALE VOLKSPARTEI AND THE DAWES PLAN 1923-1924 A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of History The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts. by William P. Bradley 1978 APPROVAL SHEET This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Author Approved, July’1978 G q'o rge/V. Strong / Thomas Shept>ar> arga/ret HamfYton TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT.........................................................iv INTRODUCTION.................................................... 2 CHAPTER I. THE COMMITTEE AND THE PLAN....................5 CHAPTER II. THE DNVP AND THE DAWES PLAN: THE DEBATE . .2 1 CHAPTER III. THE DNVP AND THE DAWES PLAN: THE VOTE. 40 CHAPTER IV. CONCLUSION ....................................... 56 BIBLIOGRAPHY....................................................64 i i i ABSTRACT This investigation was undertaken in order to determine the nature of nationalist reaction to the Dawes Plan in Germany.
    [Show full text]
  • Munich in the 1920S
    International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Vol. 1 No. 20; December 2011 Hitler’s Beer Hall Politics: A Reassessment based on New Historical Scholarship Jeffrey Gaab, Ph. D. Professor of History Department of History, Economics, and Politics SUNY College Farmingdale 2350 Broadhollow Road Farmingdale, New York. USA 11735. Abstract As the eightieth anniversary of Adolf Hitler’s accession to power in Germany approaches in 2013, recent scholarship has revised Hitler’s description of his formative experiences. This new scholarship demonstrates that Hitler’s time in Munich was far more significant than his period in Vienna. The new secondary literature demonstrates conclusively that Munich, not Vienna, became the “school of his life.” It was in Munich, as a “beer hall agitator,” where Hitler learned the political skills he would later employ to outmaneuver Germany’s professional politicians and seize power in 1933. Ian Kershaw has described Hitler’s years in Munich as “the years of his political apprenticeship.” Hitler developed an “aggressive obstinacy” during his years in Munich that lead to his political success. The “aggressive obstinacy” developed after numerous experiences in Munich’s beer halls. This paper argues that the road to the Reich’s Chancellery in 1933 lead through Munich’s beer halls in the 1920s. Key Words: Adolf Hitler, Germany, Third Reich, National Socialism, Munich, Beer Hall. Introduction In Mein Kampf, Adolf Hitler wrote that his political development occurred during his time in Vienna before he came to Germany in 1913. In Vienna, Hitler wrote, “I obtained the foundations for a philosophy in general and a political view in particular which later I only needed to supplement in detail, but which never left me.” In fact, Hitler argues that his political “awakening” caused him to leave Vienna for Munich.
    [Show full text]
  • 1920S Politics and the Great Depression
    AP U.S. History: Unit 7.5 Teacher’s Edition 1920s Politics and the Great Depression I. Election of 1920 Use space below for notes: A. The Republicans nominated Warren G. Harding of Ohio (Calvin Coolidge was nominated as his vice presidential running mate). 1. Their platform was effectively ambiguous regarding whether or not to join the League of Nations 2. Harding spoke of returning America to "Normalcy" a. Americans seemed less interested in international issues. b. Many Americans were tired of the idealism, sacrifice and overreaching reforms of the Progressive era. 3. The Conservative "Old Guard" wing of the Republican party now A Republican campaign dominated as Roosevelt’s Progressive followers had bolted the poster, 1920 party in 1912 and lost much influence in the Republican party once they returned in 1916. B. The Democrats nominated James M. Cox of Ohio who supported America joining the League of Nations. His running mate was assistant navy secretary Franklin Delano Roosevelt. C. Result: 1. Harding defeated Cox 404-127 in the Electoral College. 2. Women voted for the first time in a national election. 3. Eugene Debs received about 6% of the vote for the Socialist party while sitting in jail (Harding pardoned him several months later). 4. Isolationists turned the Republican victory into a mandate to block U.S. entry into the League of Nations. II. Harding’s administration A. Significant members of Harding’s cabinet 1. Charles Evans Hughes: Secretary of State Led several important international peace conferences 2. Andrew W. Mellon: Secretary of the Treasury a. Lowered the national debt and taxes for the wealthy b.
    [Show full text]