Prolonged Sperm Storage Duration in Domesticated Canaries

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Prolonged Sperm Storage Duration in Domesticated Canaries 770 ShortCommunications [Auk,Vol. 104 ProlongedSperm StorageDuration in DomesticatedCanaries T. R. BIRKHEAD ZoologyDepartment, The University, Sheffield S10 2TN, UnitedKingdom Relative to most mammals, female birds can retain weekspreviously. The other 8 birdsin the aviary were their fertility for a considerabletime after mating and subsequentlypaired and confirmed to be females.Es- separationfrom the male (Lake 1975).Maximum sperm timated sperm storageduration was 35 days. storagedurations range from about 6 days in Ringed (4) A female canarywas paired to a male European Turtle-Doves (Streptopeliarisoria), 16 days in ducks, Goldfinch (C. carduelis),and the male removed once and 35 days in chickens to 72 days in turkeys (see the clutch was complete.A single goldfinch mule was Birkhead 1987 for a review). No published informa- reared: this took 42 days (14 days of incubation and tion is available on the duration of sperm storagein 28 daysto rear the chick).The female canarywas then passerines.Here I report maximum sperm storageval- paired immediately with a male siskin, and within a ues for female domesticated Common Canaries (Ser- week a clutch had been laid. One chick was reared inus canaria). from this clutch, but this was alsoa goldfinch rather I collecteddata from a questionnaireto breedersof than a siskin mule. Estimatedsperm storageduration canariesand "mules" (i.e. hybrids between a British was 49 days. finch male x canary female). Six independent in- (5 and 6) The situation was identical to that in (2) stanceswere reported; in each case female canaries above, except that after the second brood had been laid fertile eggsseveral days or weeksafter separation reared and the chicks removed, the female laid a third from the males. Routinely, some breeders separate clutch without being remated. The entire third clutch the male and female after the clutch has been laid, was fertile, but it is not known whether the eggs leaving the female to incubate and rear the young hatched. Estimated sperm storage duration was 35 alone (Carr 1959, Dodwell 1986). After the first brood days for the secondclutch and 68 days for the third had been reared,some females laid fertile eggswith- clutch. out being remated. Other instancesinvolved casesof Although theseindividual values are conservative, unexpectedpaternity when femaleshad been paired they are likely to lie near the extreme for canaries. with males of two different finch speciesin succes- Nonetheless,the maximum value, 68 days, is similar sion. In each case described below I give the most to the maximum record for any bird species:72 days conservativeestimate of the duration of sperm stor- in domesticatedturkeys (Lorenz 1950) and 60 days in age. Grey-facedPetrels (Pterodroma macroptera, Imber 1976; (1) A female canary was paired to a male Eurasian see Perrins and Brooke 1976, Hatch 1987 for infor- Linnet (Cardueliscannabina), but the linnet died before mation for other Procellariiformes). any eggs were laid. Approximately 3 weeks later the Information on the duration of sperm storage is female canarywas paired to a male Common Redpoll essentialif one is to calculateaccurately the period (C.fiammea); they built a nestand a clutch was started over which a female bird might be fertilized. In par- after 7 days. Of the clutch of 4 eggs, 2 were fertile. ticular, it is important to know the timing and du- When the chicks fledged they were clearly linnet ration of this period to determine whether extrapair rather than redpoll mules, i.e. the linnet had fertilized copulationsoccur when they could fertilize eggs.Sev- the eggs,not the redpoll. Sperm storageduration was eral workers, including me (Birkhead 1982), have as- estimatedat 28 days. sumed, in the absenceof data, that sperm storage (2) A male and female canary were separatedafter duration in passerinesis considerably less than the egg laying and the female left to incubate(13-14 days) values presented here suggest. and rear the young alone. After the chicks were re- The adaptive significanceof the prolonged sperm moved (aged 21 days), the female laid a secondclutch storage that occurs in some birds is poorly under- "within days";one egg was fertile and subsequently stood, but it may be important in speciesin which hatched. Estimated sperm storage duration was 35 females copulate infrequently but produce large days. clutches (e.g. some Galliformes; see Birkhead et al. (3) Ten canaries,all thought to be female, were 1987)and in seabirds,where the femalemay be away maintained in an aviary over winter. In early Feb- from the colony and her partner for extended periods ruary one bird (obviouslya male) was heard singing before laying (see Imber 1976, Hatch 1983). There is and removed. Four weeks later one of the females no compellingreason why canariesshould have pro- was paired to a male Eurasian Siskin (C. spinus)in a longed sperm storage.Wild canariesproduce clutches separatecage; this pair built a nest and started to lay of 4-5 eggs (Bannerman and Bannerman 1968), and within a week. From the clutchof 5 eggs3 were fertile the male and the female are unlikely to be apart for and proved to be canaries,not siskin mules. The fe- long periods.In all other carduelinefinches that have male could have been fertilized only by the male been studied, and in domesticated canaries, mate canary, which had been removed from the aviary 4 guarding is well developed; the male remains with October1987] ShortCommunications 771 the female continuouslyuntil she startsto incubate --, L. ATKIN,& A. P. MOLLER.1987. Copulation (Tsuneki 1961;Newton 1972,pers. comm.). One pos- behaviour in birds. Behaviour 101: 101-138. sible explanation for the results on canariesis that CARR,V. A.V. 1959. Mule and hybrid birds.London, selectivebreeding during the periodof domestication Cage Birds. (ca.350 yr; Dodwell 1986)has produced incidentally CLAYTON,G.A. 1972. Effectsof selectionon repro- a well-developedsperm storage ability (Clayton 1972, duction in avian species.J. Reprod. Fert. Suppl. Lake 1975). This idea is plausible becausebreeders 15: 1-21. have undoubtedly selectedfor individuals that bred DODWELL,G.T. 1986. The completebook of canaries. successfullyin captivity, and prolongedsperm stor- London, Merehurst Press. age contributesto successfulbreeding. In addition, HATCrt,S. A. 1983. Mechanismand ecologicalsig- spermstorage durations differ significantlybetween nificanceof spermstorage in the Northern Ful- different strains of chickens selected for different traits mar with reference to its occurrence in other birds. (Tanejaand Gowe1961), indicating that sperm storage Auk 100: 593-600. duration hasa geneticbasis. Another explanationfor 1987. Copulationand mate guardingin the theseresults is that they representa few very rare Northern Fulmar. Auk 104: 450-461. occurrences at the extreme end of the distribution of IMBER,M. J. 1976. Breeding biology of the Grey- spermstorage duration in canaries.A systematicstudy facedPetrel Pterodromamacroptera gouldi. Ibis ! ! 8: of sperm storagein canariesand other passerines, 51-64. particularlywild species,might be interesting. LAKE,P. E. 1975. Gamete production and the fertile I am extremelygrateful to the individuals who pro- period with particular reference to domesticated videdinformation on which thisnote is based: J. May- birds. Syrup. Zool. Soc. London 35: 225-244. lan, R. Moat, T. Roberts,J. Robson,K. Swarm, and A. LORENZ,F.W. 1950. Onsetand duration of fertility C. Wyatt. I also thank Drs. M. de L. Brooke, K. M. in turkeys.Poultry Sci. 29: 20-26. Cheng,A. P. Moller, and I. Newton for commenting NEWTON, I. 1972. Finches. London, Collins. on the manuscript. PERRINS, C. M., & M. DE L. BROOKEß 1976. Manx Shearwatersin the Bay of Biscay.Bird Study 23: LITERATURE CITED 295-299. TANEJA,G. C., & R. S. GOWE.1961. Effectof varying BANNERMAN,D. A., & W. M. BANNERMAN. 1968. Birds dosesof undiluted semen on fertility in the do- of the Atlantic islands.Edinburgh. mestic fowl. Nature London 191: 828-829. BIRKHEAD,T. g. 1982. Timing and duration of mate TSUNEKI,K. 1961. Territory in flocksof the caged guardingin MagpiesPica pica. Anita. Behav.30: canaries,with special reference to its causation 277-283. and defence.Japanese J. Ecol. 11: 19-26. ß 1987. Behaviouralaspects of sperm compe- tition in birds. Adv. Stud. Behav. in press. Received28 January1987, accepted 22 April 1987. Energetic Consequencesof Sexual Size Dimorphism in White Ibises (Eudoclmus albus) KEITH L. BILDSTEIN Departmentof Biology,Winthrop College, Rock Hill, SouthCarolina 29733 USA, and Belle W. BaruchInstitute for Marine Biology,University of SouthCarolina, Columbia, South Carolina 29208 USA Sexual dimorphism is pronounced in White Ibises males and females intertwine their bills and necks (Eudocimusalbus): males are heavier than females,and during pair formation(Palmer 1962, Rudegeair 1975), they have substantiallylonger tarsi, bills, and wing and during copulation,when malesextend their bills chords(Kushlan 1977a).Sexual size dimorphism may over femalesand engagein twig pulling (Rudegeair result either from natural selectionacting to reduce 1975).A larger bill and body in malesundoubtedly intersexualfood competition or to increaseclutch size is also important for intrasexual fighting during in females (cf. Carothers 1984), or from sexual selec- courtship,mating, and nestbuilding, when malesfight tion acting to enhance the mating successof appro- over matesand attemptnest-site takeovers (Rudegeair priately sized individuals. Kushlan (1977a)proposed 1975,Frederick 1986). Fighting ability in maleshas that the size dimorphismhe reportedfor White Ibises alsobeen linked to increasedextrapair copulations in resulted from sexualselection acting to increasebody this sometimespromiscuous species (Frederick 1985a). size and bill length in males. Although female ibisesparticipate in aggressivein- Male ibisesuse their bills during courtship,when teractionsat the colonysite, female aggression is con- .
Recommended publications
  • Phylogeography of Finches and Sparrows
    In: Animal Genetics ISBN: 978-1-60741-844-3 Editor: Leopold J. Rechi © 2009 Nova Science Publishers, Inc. Chapter 1 PHYLOGEOGRAPHY OF FINCHES AND SPARROWS Antonio Arnaiz-Villena*, Pablo Gomez-Prieto and Valentin Ruiz-del-Valle Department of Immunology, University Complutense, The Madrid Regional Blood Center, Madrid, Spain. ABSTRACT Fringillidae finches form a subfamily of songbirds (Passeriformes), which are presently distributed around the world. This subfamily includes canaries, goldfinches, greenfinches, rosefinches, and grosbeaks, among others. Molecular phylogenies obtained with mitochondrial DNA sequences show that these groups of finches are put together, but with some polytomies that have apparently evolved or radiated in parallel. The time of appearance on Earth of all studied groups is suggested to start after Middle Miocene Epoch, around 10 million years ago. Greenfinches (genus Carduelis) may have originated at Eurasian desert margins coming from Rhodopechys obsoleta (dessert finch) or an extinct pale plumage ancestor; it later acquired green plumage suitable for the greenfinch ecological niche, i.e.: woods. Multicolored Eurasian goldfinch (Carduelis carduelis) has a genetic extant ancestor, the green-feathered Carduelis citrinella (citril finch); this was thought to be a canary on phonotypical bases, but it is now included within goldfinches by our molecular genetics phylograms. Speciation events between citril finch and Eurasian goldfinch are related with the Mediterranean Messinian salinity crisis (5 million years ago). Linurgus olivaceus (oriole finch) is presently thriving in Equatorial Africa and was included in a separate genus (Linurgus) by itself on phenotypical bases. Our phylograms demonstrate that it is and old canary. Proposed genus Acanthis does not exist. Twite and linnet form a separate radiation from redpolls.
    [Show full text]
  • About Eating and Not Eaten. Vigilance and Foraging Strategies in Wintering Eurasian Siskins (Carduelis Spinus)
    About eating and not eaten. Vigilance and foraging strategies in wintering Eurasian siskins (Carduelis spinus) Sobre menjar i no ser menjar: estratègies de vigilància i alimentació en lluers hivernants (Carduelis spinus) Jordi Pascual Sala ADVERTIMENT. La consulta d’aquesta tesi queda condicionada a l’acceptació de les següents condicions d'ús: La difusió d’aquesta tesi per mitjà del servei TDX (www.tdx.cat) i a través del Dipòsit Digital de la UB (diposit.ub.edu) ha estat autoritzada pels titulars dels drets de propietat intel·lectual únicament per a usos privats emmarcats en activitats d’investigació i docència. No s’autoritza la seva reproducció amb finalitats de lucre ni la seva difusió i posada a disposició des d’un lloc aliè al servei TDX ni al Dipòsit Digital de la UB. No s’autoritza la presentació del seu contingut en una finestra o marc aliè a TDX o al Dipòsit Digital de la UB (framing). Aquesta reserva de drets afecta tant al resum de presentació de la tesi com als seus continguts. En la utilització o cita de parts de la tesi és obligat indicar el nom de la persona autora. ADVERTENCIA. La consulta de esta tesis queda condicionada a la aceptación de las siguientes condiciones de uso: La difusión de esta tesis por medio del servicio TDR (www.tdx.cat) y a través del Repositorio Digital de la UB (diposit.ub.edu) ha sido autorizada por los titulares de los derechos de propiedad intelectual únicamente para usos privados enmarcados en actividades de investigación y docencia. No se autoriza su reproducción con finalidades de lucro ni su difusión y puesta a disposición desde un sitio ajeno al servicio TDR o al Repositorio Digital de la UB.
    [Show full text]
  • Niche Analysis and Conservation of Bird Species Using Urban Core Areas
    sustainability Article Niche Analysis and Conservation of Bird Species Using Urban Core Areas Vasilios Liordos 1,* , Jukka Jokimäki 2 , Marja-Liisa Kaisanlahti-Jokimäki 2, Evangelos Valsamidis 1 and Vasileios J. Kontsiotis 1 1 Department of Forest and Natural Environment Sciences, International Hellenic University, 66100 Drama, Greece; [email protected] (E.V.); [email protected] (V.J.K.) 2 Arctic Centre, University of Lapland, 96101 Rovaniemi, Finland; jukka.jokimaki@ulapland.fi (J.J.); marja-liisa.kaisanlahti@ulapland.fi (M.-L.K.-J.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Knowing the ecological requirements of bird species is essential for their successful con- servation. We studied the niche characteristics of birds in managed small-sized green spaces in the urban core areas of southern (Kavala, Greece) and northern Europe (Rovaniemi, Finland), during the breeding season, based on a set of 16 environmental variables and using Outlying Mean Index, a multivariate ordination technique. Overall, 26 bird species in Kavala and 15 in Rovaniemi were recorded in more than 5% of the green spaces and were used in detailed analyses. In both areas, bird species occupied different niches of varying marginality and breadth, indicating varying responses to urban environmental conditions. Birds showed high specialization in niche position, with 12 species in Kavala (46.2%) and six species in Rovaniemi (40.0%) having marginal niches. Niche breadth was narrower in Rovaniemi than in Kavala. Species in both communities were more strongly associated either with large green spaces located further away from the city center and having a high vegetation cover (urban adapters; e.g., Common Chaffinch (Fringilla coelebs), European Greenfinch (Chloris Citation: Liordos, V.; Jokimäki, J.; chloris Cyanistes caeruleus Kaisanlahti-Jokimäki, M.-L.; ), Eurasian Blue Tit ( )) or with green spaces located closer to the city center Valsamidis, E.; Kontsiotis, V.J.
    [Show full text]
  • Convergence in Foraging Guild Structure of Forest Breeding Bird Assemblages Across Three Continents Is Related to Habitat Structure and Foraging Opportunities
    COMMUNITY ECOLOGY 14(1): 89-100, 2013 1585-8553/$20.00 © Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest DOI: 10.1556/ComEc.14.2013.1.10 Convergence in foraging guild structure of forest breeding bird assemblages across three continents is related to habitat structure and foraging opportunities M. Korňan1,2,7, R. T. Holmes3, H. F. Recher4,5, P. Adamík6 and R. Kropil2 1Centre for Ecological Studies, Ústredie 14, 013 62 Veľké Rovné, Slovakia 2Department of Forest Protection and Game Management, Faculty of Forestry, Technical University in Zvolen, T.G. Masaryka 20, 960 53 Zvolen, Slovakia; E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 3Department of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth College, 78 College St., Hanover, New Hampshire 03755, U.S.A.; E-mail: [email protected] 4The Australian Museum, 6-8 College Street, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia 2000 5Current address: P.O. Box 154, Brooklyn, New South Wales, Australia 2083; E-mail: [email protected] 6Department of Zoology, Palacký University, Tř. Svobody 26, 771 46 Olomouc, The Czech Republic; E-mail: [email protected] 7Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Keywords: Bird community structure, Bondi State Forest, Bootstrap testing, Cluster analysis, Foraging guilds, Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, Intercontinental guild comparisons, Ordination, Resource partitioning, Šrámková National Nature Reserve. Abstract. Comparisons of community structure across sites allow for the detection of convergent patterns and the selective forces that have produced them. In this study, we examined
    [Show full text]
  • Eurasian Siskins in North America Distinguishing Females from Green
    Reprinted from: American Birds, Winter 1989, Volume 43, Number 5 Printed in U.S. A. Eurasian Siskins in North America­ distinguishing females from green-morph Pine Siskins Ian A. McLaren, Joseph Morlan, P. William Smith, Michel Gosselin, and Stephen F. Bailey Figure 1. Dorsal view of the green-morph Pine Siskin in Halifax, Nova Scotia. early April 1986. Photo/!. McLaren. N MARCH 26,1986, AN UNUSUAL were clearly Pine Siskins in other at- suggested that it was probably a Pine siskin turned up at McLaren's tributes, and they were not widely re- Siskin because of its bright yellow un- O feeder in Halifax, Nova Scotia. ported. The original Halifax bird dertail coverts, a feature lacking in It was dark grayish-green on the back, (Figs. 1, 2) required more research Eurasian Siskins (With~rby et at. with strong yellow wing and tail before finally being identified as an 1943). The photographs show that the patches, a greenish-yellow rump, and example of the little-known green bird was definitely a green-morph tinged with yellow on the head and morph of the Pine Siskin. Pine Siskin, based on this and other underparts. Furthermore, it appeared Meanwhile, in late February 1987 characters discussed below. smaller and its bill seemed deeper an unusual siskin flew into a window Our purpose~ in writing this ac- than average among scores of Pine ofe. J. Ralph's house in Arcata, Cal- count are to review available infor- Siskins (Carduelis pinus) coming to ifornia. The bird was stunned briefly, mation on claimed occurrences of the the feeder.
    [Show full text]
  • Advances in the Study of Irruptive Migration
    Advances in the study of irruptive migration Ian Newton1 Newton I. 2006. Advances in the study of irruptive migration. Ardea 94(3): 433–460. This paper discusses the movement patterns of two groups of birds which are generally regarded as irruptive migrants, namely (a) boreal finches and others that depend on fluctuating tree-fruit crops, and (b) owls and others that depend on cyclically fluctuating rodent popula- tions. Both groups specialise on food supplies which, in particular regions, fluctuate more than 100-fold from year to year. However, seed- crops in widely separated regions may fluctuate independently of one another, as may rodent populations, so that poor food supplies in one region may coincide with good supplies in another. If individuals are to have access to rich food supplies every year, they must often move hun- dreds or thousands of kilometres from one breeding area to another. In years of widespread food shortage (or high numbers relative to food supplies) extending over many thousands or millions of square kilome- tres, large numbers of individuals migrate to lower latitudes, as an ‘irruptive migration’. For these reasons, the distribution of the popula- tion, in both summer and winter, varies greatly from year to year. In irruptive migrants, in contrast to regular migrants, site fidelity is poor, and few individuals return to the same breeding areas in succes- sive years (apart from owls in the increase phase of the cycle). Moreover, ring recoveries and radio-tracking confirm that the same indi- viduals can breed in different years in areas separated by hundreds or thousands of kilometres.
    [Show full text]
  • EUROPEAN BIRDS of CONSERVATION CONCERN Populations, Trends and National Responsibilities
    EUROPEAN BIRDS OF CONSERVATION CONCERN Populations, trends and national responsibilities COMPILED BY ANNA STANEVA AND IAN BURFIELD WITH SPONSORSHIP FROM CONTENTS Introduction 4 86 ITALY References 9 89 KOSOVO ALBANIA 10 92 LATVIA ANDORRA 14 95 LIECHTENSTEIN ARMENIA 16 97 LITHUANIA AUSTRIA 19 100 LUXEMBOURG AZERBAIJAN 22 102 MACEDONIA BELARUS 26 105 MALTA BELGIUM 29 107 MOLDOVA BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 32 110 MONTENEGRO BULGARIA 35 113 NETHERLANDS CROATIA 39 116 NORWAY CYPRUS 42 119 POLAND CZECH REPUBLIC 45 122 PORTUGAL DENMARK 48 125 ROMANIA ESTONIA 51 128 RUSSIA BirdLife Europe and Central Asia is a partnership of 48 national conservation organisations and a leader in bird conservation. Our unique local to global FAROE ISLANDS DENMARK 54 132 SERBIA approach enables us to deliver high impact and long term conservation for the beneit of nature and people. BirdLife Europe and Central Asia is one of FINLAND 56 135 SLOVAKIA the six regional secretariats that compose BirdLife International. Based in Brus- sels, it supports the European and Central Asian Partnership and is present FRANCE 60 138 SLOVENIA in 47 countries including all EU Member States. With more than 4,100 staf in Europe, two million members and tens of thousands of skilled volunteers, GEORGIA 64 141 SPAIN BirdLife Europe and Central Asia, together with its national partners, owns or manages more than 6,000 nature sites totaling 320,000 hectares. GERMANY 67 145 SWEDEN GIBRALTAR UNITED KINGDOM 71 148 SWITZERLAND GREECE 72 151 TURKEY GREENLAND DENMARK 76 155 UKRAINE HUNGARY 78 159 UNITED KINGDOM ICELAND 81 162 European population sizes and trends STICHTING BIRDLIFE EUROPE GRATEFULLY ACKNOWLEDGES FINANCIAL SUPPORT FROM THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION.
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Summary of Conservation Status and Small Numbers
    Technical considerations in conjunction with the proposal to apply Autumn derogation for the live-capturing of seven finch species – Chaffinch ( Fringilla coelebs ), Linnet ( Carduelis cannabina ), European Goldfinch ( Carduelis carduelis ), European Greenfinch ( Carduelis chloris ), Hawfinch ( Coccothraustes coccothrausthes ), European Serin ( Serinus serinus ) and Eurasian Siskin ( Carduelis spinus ). An analysis of the proposal presented by the Federation for Hunting and Conservation — Malta (FKNK) Wild Birds Regulation Unit Parliamentary Secretariat for Agriculture, Fisheries and Animal Rights Ministry for Sustainable Development, the Environment and Climate Change April 2014 Abbreviations BTO British Trust for Ornithology BWP Birds of the Western Palearctic FKNK The Federation for Hunting and Conservation — Malta IUCN International Union for Conservation of Nature KVM Das Kompendium der Vögel Mitteleuropas WBRU Wild Birds Regulation Unit i Executive Summary On the 22 nd August 2013, the Federation for Hunting and Conservation — Malta (FKNK) submitted a proposal before Malta Ornis Committee concerning the application of a derogation under Article 9 of the EC Birds Directive to permit limited live capturing of seven species of finches under strictly supervised regime. The Committee requested the Wild Birds Regulation Unit to assess this proposal from a legal, technical and conservation point of view and to refer back its analysis for further consideration. FKNK’s proposal concerns the opening of an autumn 2014 season for the live-capturing of seven finch species, namely Chaffinch ( Fringilla coelebs ), Linnet ( Carduelis cannabina ), Goldfinch ( Carduelis carduelis ), Greenfinch (Carduelis chloris ), Hawfinch ( Coccothraustes coccothraustes ), Serin ( Serinus serinus ) and Siskin ( Carduelis spinus ) from 7 October to 7 December. This report reviews the technical and conservation issues arising out of this proposal with the aim of providing the Ornis Committee and the Government with an informed basis for further consideration and decision.
    [Show full text]
  • Whales & Dolphins of Madeira
    Whales & Dolphins of Madeira Naturetrek Tour Report 1 - 5 September 2011 Short-finned Pilot Whales by George Reekie Atlantic Spotted Dolphin by Liz Scott Atlantic Spotted Dolphin by George Reekie Short-finned Pilot Whales by George Reekie Report compiled by Catherine Strong Images by kind courtesy of Liz Scott and George Reekie Naturetrek Cheriton Mill Cheriton Alresford Hampshire SO24 0NG England T: +44 (0)1962 733051 F: +44 (0)1962 736426 E: [email protected] W: www.naturetrek.co.uk Tour Report Whales & Dolphins of Madeira Tour Leaders: Catherine Strong Naturetrek Leader Luis Dias Local pelagic guide & naturalist Filipe Alves Local marine biologist guide Raquel Local pelagic guide João Local ornithologist & naturalist guide Participants: George Reekie Sue Reekie Sue Hill Liz Scott Lalage Grundy Matt Creasey David Carlton Alex Wilkins Richard Wilkins Helen Ingelbrecht Michelle Leahair Tour summary This holiday was characterised by lovely weather, calm seas, excellent company and some of the best dolphin- watching you could imagine! The highlight for many of us was a wonderful encounter with a group of Atlantic Spotted Dolphins which were bow-riding, tail-slapping and swimming around our boat, very close, for about 40 minutes. We also had a wonderful afternoon with local marine biologist Filipe Alves, who is doing a PhD on Madeira’s resident pod of Short-finned Pilot Whales. Filipe was able to name members of the group we were seeing, and give us a unique insight into their lives and histories. All but two of the group took part in a late-night optional squid-fishing trip, during which the sea was lit by bioluminescence and we could hear a pilot whale surface and blow next to us in the moonlight.
    [Show full text]
  • Allofeeding in Eurasian Siskins (Carduelis Spinus)
    SHORT COMMUNICATIONS 213 The Condor 86:213-214 beak, while at other times, it was the other way round; 0 The Cooper Ornithological Society 1984 this could be interpreted as a solicitation. All of the instancesof allofeeding involved individuals ALLOFEEDING IN EURASIAN with a clear hierarchical relationship. The instances of SISIUNS (CARDUELIS SPINUS) allofeedingtook place between the alpha male(N) and his clearly subordinate A in all the phasesof the study that were appropriate for allofeeding. They also occurred be- tween N and his subordinate, L, but only in the phase JUAN CARLOS SENAR when L was more clearly subordinateto N (at the end of March 1981). Food was always passed from the subor- dinate to the dominant, which corroboratesSmith ’s theory Birds passfood to each other in three principal situations: (1980) that the receiving of food is correlated with dom- adults feeding their young, males feeding their mates, and inance. “allofeedinn.” As defined bv Smith (1980). this last often At the beginningof the allofeedingperiod, this behavior occursbetween members ofthe same sex,is not restricted sometimes appeared after a fight. In such fighting, the to the breeding season,commonly entails refusal of the mutual aggressivepecking of beaks (the A6 display in proffered food, and includes little or no food solicitation. Senar 1982) becameprogressively less violent and became Allofeeding has been described in only three highly social a mutual touching and scissoringof the beaks. Conse- species:the Florida Scrub Jay (Aphelocomac. coerules- quently, the two birds were able to stay closeto each other tens; Woolfenden and Fitzpatrick 1977), the Arabian without aggression.As the breeding seasonadvanced (by Brown Babbler (Turdoidessquamiceps; Zahavi in Smith March or April), I could observe a true passingof food, 1980), and the Social Weaver (Philetairus socius;Collias which paralleled the rise of mutual tolerance of the male and Collias 1978).
    [Show full text]
  • Trip Report June 21 – July 2, 2017 | Written by Guide Gerard Gorman
    Austria & Hungary: Trip Report June 21 – July 2, 2017 | Written by guide Gerard Gorman With Guide Gerard Gorman and Participants: Jane, Susan, and Cynthia and David This was the first Naturalist Journeys tour to combine Austria and Hungary, and it was a great success. We visited and birded some wonderfully diverse habitats and landscapes in 12 days — the forested foothills of the Alps in Lower Austria, the higher Alpine peak of Hochkar, the reed beds around Lake Neusiedler, the grasslands and wetlands of the Seewinkel in Austria and the Hanság in Hungary, the lowland steppes and farmlands of the Kiskunság east of the Danube, and finally the pleasant rolling limestone hills of the Bükk in north-east Hungary. In this way, we encountered diverse and distinct habitats and therefore birds, other wildlife, and flora, everywhere we went. We also stayed in a variety of different family-run guesthouses and lodges and sampled only local cuisine. As we went, we also found time to take in some of the rich history and culture of these two countries. Wed., June 21, 2017 We met up at Vienna International Airport at noon and were quickly on our way eastwards into Lower Austria. It was a pleasant sunny day and the traffic around the city was a little heavy, but we were soon away from the ring-road and in rural Austria. Roadside birds included both Carrion and Hooded Crows, several Eurasian Kestrels, and Barn Swallows zoomed overhead. Near Hainfeld we drove up a farm road, stopped for a picnic, and did our first real birding.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Finches” Put Your Logo Here
    Javier Blasco-Zumeta & Gerd-Michael Heinze Sponsor is needed. Write your name here 432a Idenfification of “Green Finches” Put your logo here IDENTIFICATION OF “GREEN FIN- CHES” (GENUS Chloris , Serinus , Car- duelis and Spinus ) 1 - With yellow patches on flight and tail feat- hers..……………………………...... 2 1 - Without yellow patches on flight and tail feathers ………….…………..…..... 5 2 - With yellow patches on all flight feathers 2 ….……………………….……. 3 5 - With yellow patches only on primaries 3 ……..………………….…………..... 4 3 - Crown and breast greenish-white streaked Eurasian Siskin. Fe- dark; tail feathers with yellow patches only on male: with yellow the outer webs: Eurasian Siskin, female ( Spinus patches on all flight spinus ) feathers (1); crown (2) and breast (3) - With dark crown; unstreaked yellow breast; streaked; tail feathers tail feathers with extensive yellow patches: Eu- with yellow patches rasian Siskin, male ( Spinus spinus ) only on the outer webs (4); long and 4 - The yellow patches on primaries do not 4 pointed bill (5). reach the shafts; outer tail feathers with yellow patches only on inner webs; unstreaked greenish -grey breast: European Greenfinch, female (Chloris chloris ) - The yellow patches on primaries reach the shafts; outer tail feathers with extensive yellow patches; unstreaked greenish breast: European Greenfinch, male ( Chloris chloris ) 1 - With wings and tail similar to those des- cribed but with streaked breast: European Greenfinch, juvenile ( Chloris chloris ) 2 5 - With unstreaked breast and flanks: Citril Finch, adult ( Carduelis citrinella ) 5 3 - With streaks on breast and/or flanks …. 6 6 - With unstreaked breast and streaked flanks: European serin, male ( Serinus serinus ) Eurasian Siskin. Male: with yellow patches on - With streaks on breast and flanks ..…….7 all flight feathers (1); dark crown (2); 7 - Breast bolding streaked dark; with short and unstreaked yellow stubby bill: European serin, female/juvenile breast (3); tail feathers (Serinus serinus ) with extensive yellow patches (4); long and pointed bill (5).
    [Show full text]