DOCSLIB.ORG

5 Summary of Conservation Status and Small Numbers

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
5 Summary of Conservation Status and Small Numbers Technical considerations in conjunction with the proposal to apply Autumn derogation for the live-capturing of seven finch species – Chaffinch ( Fringilla coelebs ), Linnet ( Carduelis cannabina ), European Goldfinch ( Carduelis carduelis ), European Greenfinch ( Carduelis chloris ), Hawfinch ( Coccothraustes coccothrausthes ), European Serin ( Serinus serinus ) and Eurasian Siskin ( Carduelis spinus ). An analysis of the proposal presented by the Federation for Hunting and Conservation — Malta (FKNK) Wild Birds Regulation Unit Parliamentary Secretariat for Agriculture, Fisheries and Animal Rights Ministry for Sustainable Development, the Environment and Climate Change April 2014 Abbreviations BTO British Trust for Ornithology BWP Birds of the Western Palearctic FKNK The Federation for Hunting and Conservation — Malta IUCN International Union for Conservation of Nature KVM Das Kompendium der Vögel Mitteleuropas WBRU Wild Birds Regulation Unit i Executive Summary On the 22 nd August 2013, the Federation for Hunting and Conservation — Malta (FKNK) submitted a proposal before Malta Ornis Committee concerning the application of a derogation under Article 9 of the EC Birds Directive to permit limited live capturing of seven species of finches under strictly supervised regime. The Committee requested the Wild Birds Regulation Unit to assess this proposal from a legal, technical and conservation point of view and to refer back its analysis for further consideration. FKNK’s proposal concerns the opening of an autumn 2014 season for the live-capturing of seven finch species, namely Chaffinch ( Fringilla coelebs ), Linnet ( Carduelis cannabina ), Goldfinch ( Carduelis carduelis ), Greenfinch (Carduelis chloris ), Hawfinch ( Coccothraustes coccothraustes ), Serin ( Serinus serinus ) and Siskin ( Carduelis spinus ) from 7 October to 7 December. This report reviews the technical and conservation issues arising out of this proposal with the aim of providing the Ornis Committee and the Government with an informed basis for further consideration and decision. ii Contents Page No. Abbreviations......................................................................................................................................... i Executive Summary.............................................................................................................................. ii Key to conservation status codes.......................................................................................................... vi Categories of Species of European Conservation Concern (SPECs) and Non-SPECs........................ vi 1. FKNK’s proposal................................................................................................................................. 1 2. Consideration of specific conditions in the application of the derogation................................... 1 (i) Small numbers criteria............................................................................................................ 1 (ii) FKNK’s proposal with respect to small numbers..................................................................... 2 3. Methodology........................................................................................................................................ 3 a) Conservation status............................................................................................................................... 3 b) Ring recoveries..................................................................................................................................... 4 c) Recruitment rate: breeding success vs. breeding rate.......................................................................... 5 d) Partitioning of the <% mortality with other Member States.................................................................. 5 e) Formula for calculating <1% mortality of the reference population and proportionality to Carnet de Chasse data.......................................................................................................................................... 6 Species Conservation Status and Small Numbers 4. Chaffinch ( Fringilla coelebs ).............................................................................................................. 7 5. Linnet ( Carduelis cannabina )............................................................................................................. 13 6. European Goldfinch ( Carduelis carduelis )....................................................................................... 20 7. Greenfinch ( Carduelis chloris )........................................................................................................... 26 8. Hawfinch ( Coccothraustes coccothraustes ).................................................................................... 32 9. Serin ( Serinus serinus )....................................................................................................................... 40 10. Siskin ( Carduelus spinus ).................................................................................................................. 45 11. Conclusions regarding the reference populations and the <1% threshold................................... 51 12. Conclusion........................................................................................................................................... 52 References............................................................................................................................................ 53 Appendix I: FKNK’s proposal for autumn live-capturing of seven finch species.................................. 54 List of Figures Fig. 1 Distribution and conservation status of the European Chaffinch ( Fringilla coelebs ).......................... 7 Fig. 2 Chaffinch EU population trend by Member State............................................................................... 10 Fig. 3 Chaffinch EU population trend (ring recoveries in Malta)................................................................... 10 Fig. 4 Distribution and conservation status of the Linnet ( Carduelis cannabiba ).......................................... 13 Fig. 5 Linnet EU population trend by Member State..................................................................................... 16 Fig. 6 Linnet EU population trend (ring recoveries in Malta)......................................................................... 16 Fig. 7 Linnet EU ring recoveries: overall change (minimum pairs)............................................................... 16 Fig. 8 Linnet EU ring recoveries: overall change (maximum pairs).............................................................. 16 Fig. 9 Distribution and conservation status of the Goldfinch (Carduelis carduelis )....................................... 20 Fig. 10 Goldfinch EU population trend by Member State............................................................................... 23 Fig. 11 Goldfinch EU population trend (ring recoveries in Malta)................................................................... 23 Fig. 12 Distribution and conservation status of the Greenfinch ( Carduelis chloris )........................................ 26 Fig. 13 Greenfinch EU population trend by Member State............................................................................. 29 iii Fig. 14 Greenfinch EU population trend (ring recoveries in Malta)................................................................. 29 Fig. 15 Distribution and conservation status of the Hawfinch ( Coccothraustes coccothraustes )................... 32 Fig. 16 Foreign-ring recoveries of Hawfinches in Italy.......................................................................... 35 Fig. 17 Foreign-ringed Hawfinches recovered in Italy during the autumn migration period............................ 35 Fig. 18 Hawfinch EU population trend by Member State............................................................................... 36 Fig. 19 Hawfinch EU population trend (ring recoveries in Italy)...................................................................... 36 Fig. 20 Hawfinch EU ring recoveries: overall change (minimum pairs).......................................................... 37 Fig. 21 Hawfinch EU ring recoveries: overall change (maximum pairs)......................................................... 37 Fig. 22 Distribution and conservation status of the Serin ( Serinus serinus )................................................... 40 Fig. 23 Serin EU population trend by Member State...................................................................................... 43 Fig. 24 Serin EU population trend (ring recoveries in Malta).......................................................................... 43 Fig. 25 Distribution and conservation status of the Siskin ( Carduelis spinus )................................................ 45 Fig. 26 Siskin EU population trend by Member State..................................................................................... 48 Fig. 27 Siskin EU population trend (ring recoveries in Malta)......................................................................... 48 List of Tables Table 1 Carnet de Chasse live-capturing data for the seven finch species (2002–2008)............................. 2 Table 2 Short-term and long-term trend classifications of the seven finch species (Pan-European)............ 3 Table 3 Percentage change in the minimum and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Phylogeography of Finches and Sparrows
    In: Animal Genetics ISBN: 978-1-60741-844-3 Editor: Leopold J. Rechi © 2009 Nova Science Publishers, Inc. Chapter 1 PHYLOGEOGRAPHY OF FINCHES AND SPARROWS Antonio Arnaiz-Villena*, Pablo Gomez-Prieto and Valentin Ruiz-del-Valle Department of Immunology, University Complutense, The Madrid Regional Blood Center, Madrid, Spain. ABSTRACT Fringillidae finches form a subfamily of songbirds (Passeriformes), which are presently distributed around the world. This subfamily includes canaries, goldfinches, greenfinches, rosefinches, and grosbeaks, among others. Molecular phylogenies obtained with mitochondrial DNA sequences show that these groups of finches are put together, but with some polytomies that have apparently evolved or radiated in parallel. The time of appearance on Earth of all studied groups is suggested to start after Middle Miocene Epoch, around 10 million years ago. Greenfinches (genus Carduelis) may have originated at Eurasian desert margins coming from Rhodopechys obsoleta (dessert finch) or an extinct pale plumage ancestor; it later acquired green plumage suitable for the greenfinch ecological niche, i.e.: woods. Multicolored Eurasian goldfinch (Carduelis carduelis) has a genetic extant ancestor, the green-feathered Carduelis citrinella (citril finch); this was thought to be a canary on phonotypical bases, but it is now included within goldfinches by our molecular genetics phylograms. Speciation events between citril finch and Eurasian goldfinch are related with the Mediterranean Messinian salinity crisis (5 million years ago). Linurgus olivaceus (oriole finch) is presently thriving in Equatorial Africa and was included in a separate genus (Linurgus) by itself on phenotypical bases. Our phylograms demonstrate that it is and old canary. Proposed genus Acanthis does not exist. Twite and linnet form a separate radiation from redpolls.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing Methods for the Field Survey and Monitoring of Breeding Short-Eared Owls (Asio Flammeus) in the UK: Final Report from Pilot Fieldwork in 2006 and 2007
    BTO Research Report No. 496 Developing methods for the field survey and monitoring of breeding Short-eared owls (Asio flammeus) in the UK: Final report from pilot fieldwork in 2006 and 2007 A report to Scottish Natural Heritage Ref: 14652 Authors John Calladine, Graeme Garner and Chris Wernham February 2008 BTO Scotland School of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA Registered Charity No. SC039193 ii CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES................................................................................................................... iii LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................v LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................v LIST OF APPENDICES...........................................................................................................vi SUMMARY.............................................................................................................................vii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................... viii CRYNODEB............................................................................................................................xii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS....................................................................................................xvi 1. BACKGROUND AND AIMS...........................................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • First Records of the Common Chaffinch Fringilla Coelebs and European Greenfinch Carduelis Chloris from Lord Howe Island
    83 AUSTRALIAN FIELD ORNITHOLOGY 2004, 2I , 83- 85 First Records of the Common Chaffinch Fringilla coelebs and European Greenfinch Carduelis chloris from Lord Howe Island GLENN FRASER 34 George Street, Horsham, Victoria 3400 Summary Details are given of the first records of two species of finch from Lord Howe Island: the Common Chaffinch Fringilla coelebs and the European Greenfinch Carduelis chloris. These records, from the early 1980s, have been quoted in several papers without the details hav ing been published. My Common Chaffinch records are the first for the species in Australian territory. Details of my records and of other published records of other European finch es on Lord Howe Island are listed, and speculation is made on the origin of these finches. Introduction This paper gives details of the first records of the Common Chaffinch Fringilla coelebs and the European Greenfinch Carduelis chloris for Lord Howe Island. The Common Chaffinch records are the first for any Australian territory and although often quoted (e.g. Boles 1988, Hutton 1991, Christidis & Boles 1994), the details have not yet been published. Other finches, the European Goldfinch C. carduelis and Common Redpoll C. fiammea, both rarely reported from Lord Howe Island, were also recorded at about the same time. Lord Howe Island (31 °32'S, 159°06'E) lies c. 800 km north-east of Sydney, N.S.W. It is 600 km from the nearest landfall in New South Wales, and 1200 km from New Zealand. Lord Howe Island is small (only 11 km long x 2.8 km wide) and dominated by two mountains, Mount Lidgbird and Mount Gower, the latter rising to 866 m above sea level.
    [Show full text]
  • About Eating and Not Eaten. Vigilance and Foraging Strategies in Wintering Eurasian Siskins (Carduelis Spinus)
    About eating and not eaten. Vigilance and foraging strategies in wintering Eurasian siskins (Carduelis spinus) Sobre menjar i no ser menjar: estratègies de vigilància i alimentació en lluers hivernants (Carduelis spinus) Jordi Pascual Sala ADVERTIMENT. La consulta d’aquesta tesi queda condicionada a l’acceptació de les següents condicions d'ús: La difusió d’aquesta tesi per mitjà del servei TDX (www.tdx.cat) i a través del Dipòsit Digital de la UB (diposit.ub.edu) ha estat autoritzada pels titulars dels drets de propietat intel·lectual únicament per a usos privats emmarcats en activitats d’investigació i docència. No s’autoritza la seva reproducció amb finalitats de lucre ni la seva difusió i posada a disposició des d’un lloc aliè al servei TDX ni al Dipòsit Digital de la UB. No s’autoritza la presentació del seu contingut en una finestra o marc aliè a TDX o al Dipòsit Digital de la UB (framing). Aquesta reserva de drets afecta tant al resum de presentació de la tesi com als seus continguts. En la utilització o cita de parts de la tesi és obligat indicar el nom de la persona autora. ADVERTENCIA. La consulta de esta tesis queda condicionada a la aceptación de las siguientes condiciones de uso: La difusión de esta tesis por medio del servicio TDR (www.tdx.cat) y a través del Repositorio Digital de la UB (diposit.ub.edu) ha sido autorizada por los titulares de los derechos de propiedad intelectual únicamente para usos privados enmarcados en actividades de investigación y docencia. No se autoriza su reproducción con finalidades de lucro ni su difusión y puesta a disposición desde un sitio ajeno al servicio TDR o al Repositorio Digital de la UB.
    [Show full text]
  • Prolonged Sperm Storage Duration in Domesticated Canaries
    770 ShortCommunications [Auk,Vol. 104 ProlongedSperm StorageDuration in DomesticatedCanaries T. R. BIRKHEAD ZoologyDepartment, The University, Sheffield S10 2TN, UnitedKingdom Relative to most mammals, female birds can retain weekspreviously. The other 8 birdsin the aviary were their fertility for a considerabletime after mating and subsequentlypaired and confirmed to be females.Es- separationfrom the male (Lake 1975).Maximum sperm timated sperm storageduration was 35 days. storagedurations range from about 6 days in Ringed (4) A female canarywas paired to a male European Turtle-Doves (Streptopeliarisoria), 16 days in ducks, Goldfinch (C. carduelis),and the male removed once and 35 days in chickens to 72 days in turkeys (see the clutch was complete.A single goldfinch mule was Birkhead 1987 for a review). No published informa- reared: this took 42 days (14 days of incubation and tion is available on the duration of sperm storagein 28 daysto rear the chick).The female canarywas then passerines.Here I report maximum sperm storageval- paired immediately with a male siskin, and within a ues for female domesticated Common Canaries (Ser- week a clutch had been laid. One chick was reared inus canaria). from this clutch, but this was alsoa goldfinch rather I collecteddata from a questionnaireto breedersof than a siskin mule. Estimatedsperm storageduration canariesand "mules" (i.e. hybrids between a British was 49 days. finch male x canary female). Six independent in- (5 and 6) The situation was identical to that in (2) stanceswere reported; in each case female canaries above, except that after the second brood had been laid fertile eggsseveral days or weeksafter separation reared and the chicks removed, the female laid a third from the males.
    [Show full text]
  • Niche Analysis and Conservation of Bird Species Using Urban Core Areas
    sustainability Article Niche Analysis and Conservation of Bird Species Using Urban Core Areas Vasilios Liordos 1,* , Jukka Jokimäki 2 , Marja-Liisa Kaisanlahti-Jokimäki 2, Evangelos Valsamidis 1 and Vasileios J. Kontsiotis 1 1 Department of Forest and Natural Environment Sciences, International Hellenic University, 66100 Drama, Greece; [email protected] (E.V.); [email protected] (V.J.K.) 2 Arctic Centre, University of Lapland, 96101 Rovaniemi, Finland; jukka.jokimaki@ulapland.fi (J.J.); marja-liisa.kaisanlahti@ulapland.fi (M.-L.K.-J.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Knowing the ecological requirements of bird species is essential for their successful con- servation. We studied the niche characteristics of birds in managed small-sized green spaces in the urban core areas of southern (Kavala, Greece) and northern Europe (Rovaniemi, Finland), during the breeding season, based on a set of 16 environmental variables and using Outlying Mean Index, a multivariate ordination technique. Overall, 26 bird species in Kavala and 15 in Rovaniemi were recorded in more than 5% of the green spaces and were used in detailed analyses. In both areas, bird species occupied different niches of varying marginality and breadth, indicating varying responses to urban environmental conditions. Birds showed high specialization in niche position, with 12 species in Kavala (46.2%) and six species in Rovaniemi (40.0%) having marginal niches. Niche breadth was narrower in Rovaniemi than in Kavala. Species in both communities were more strongly associated either with large green spaces located further away from the city center and having a high vegetation cover (urban adapters; e.g., Common Chaffinch (Fringilla coelebs), European Greenfinch (Chloris Citation: Liordos, V.; Jokimäki, J.; chloris Cyanistes caeruleus Kaisanlahti-Jokimäki, M.-L.; ), Eurasian Blue Tit ( )) or with green spaces located closer to the city center Valsamidis, E.; Kontsiotis, V.J.
    [Show full text]
  • Convergence in Foraging Guild Structure of Forest Breeding Bird Assemblages Across Three Continents Is Related to Habitat Structure and Foraging Opportunities
    COMMUNITY ECOLOGY 14(1): 89-100, 2013 1585-8553/$20.00 © Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest DOI: 10.1556/ComEc.14.2013.1.10 Convergence in foraging guild structure of forest breeding bird assemblages across three continents is related to habitat structure and foraging opportunities M. Korňan1,2,7, R. T. Holmes3, H. F. Recher4,5, P. Adamík6 and R. Kropil2 1Centre for Ecological Studies, Ústredie 14, 013 62 Veľké Rovné, Slovakia 2Department of Forest Protection and Game Management, Faculty of Forestry, Technical University in Zvolen, T.G. Masaryka 20, 960 53 Zvolen, Slovakia; E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 3Department of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth College, 78 College St., Hanover, New Hampshire 03755, U.S.A.; E-mail: [email protected] 4The Australian Museum, 6-8 College Street, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia 2000 5Current address: P.O. Box 154, Brooklyn, New South Wales, Australia 2083; E-mail: [email protected] 6Department of Zoology, Palacký University, Tř. Svobody 26, 771 46 Olomouc, The Czech Republic; E-mail: [email protected] 7Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Keywords: Bird community structure, Bondi State Forest, Bootstrap testing, Cluster analysis, Foraging guilds, Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, Intercontinental guild comparisons, Ordination, Resource partitioning, Šrámková National Nature Reserve. Abstract. Comparisons of community structure across sites allow for the detection of convergent patterns and the selective forces that have produced them. In this study, we examined
    [Show full text]
  • Eurasian Siskins in North America Distinguishing Females from Green
    Reprinted from: American Birds, Winter 1989, Volume 43, Number 5 Printed in U.S. A. Eurasian Siskins in North America­ distinguishing females from green-morph Pine Siskins Ian A. McLaren, Joseph Morlan, P. William Smith, Michel Gosselin, and Stephen F. Bailey Figure 1. Dorsal view of the green-morph Pine Siskin in Halifax, Nova Scotia. early April 1986. Photo/!. McLaren. N MARCH 26,1986, AN UNUSUAL were clearly Pine Siskins in other at- suggested that it was probably a Pine siskin turned up at McLaren's tributes, and they were not widely re- Siskin because of its bright yellow un- O feeder in Halifax, Nova Scotia. ported. The original Halifax bird dertail coverts, a feature lacking in It was dark grayish-green on the back, (Figs. 1, 2) required more research Eurasian Siskins (With~rby et at. with strong yellow wing and tail before finally being identified as an 1943). The photographs show that the patches, a greenish-yellow rump, and example of the little-known green bird was definitely a green-morph tinged with yellow on the head and morph of the Pine Siskin. Pine Siskin, based on this and other underparts. Furthermore, it appeared Meanwhile, in late February 1987 characters discussed below. smaller and its bill seemed deeper an unusual siskin flew into a window Our purpose~ in writing this ac- than average among scores of Pine ofe. J. Ralph's house in Arcata, Cal- count are to review available infor- Siskins (Carduelis pinus) coming to ifornia. The bird was stunned briefly, mation on claimed occurrences of the the feeder.
    [Show full text]
  • Advances in the Study of Irruptive Migration
    Advances in the study of irruptive migration Ian Newton1 Newton I. 2006. Advances in the study of irruptive migration. Ardea 94(3): 433–460. This paper discusses the movement patterns of two groups of birds which are generally regarded as irruptive migrants, namely (a) boreal finches and others that depend on fluctuating tree-fruit crops, and (b) owls and others that depend on cyclically fluctuating rodent popula- tions. Both groups specialise on food supplies which, in particular regions, fluctuate more than 100-fold from year to year. However, seed- crops in widely separated regions may fluctuate independently of one another, as may rodent populations, so that poor food supplies in one region may coincide with good supplies in another. If individuals are to have access to rich food supplies every year, they must often move hun- dreds or thousands of kilometres from one breeding area to another. In years of widespread food shortage (or high numbers relative to food supplies) extending over many thousands or millions of square kilome- tres, large numbers of individuals migrate to lower latitudes, as an ‘irruptive migration’. For these reasons, the distribution of the popula- tion, in both summer and winter, varies greatly from year to year. In irruptive migrants, in contrast to regular migrants, site fidelity is poor, and few individuals return to the same breeding areas in succes- sive years (apart from owls in the increase phase of the cycle). Moreover, ring recoveries and radio-tracking confirm that the same indi- viduals can breed in different years in areas separated by hundreds or thousands of kilometres.
    [Show full text]
  • EUROPEAN BIRDS of CONSERVATION CONCERN Populations, Trends and National Responsibilities
    EUROPEAN BIRDS OF CONSERVATION CONCERN Populations, trends and national responsibilities COMPILED BY ANNA STANEVA AND IAN BURFIELD WITH SPONSORSHIP FROM CONTENTS Introduction 4 86 ITALY References 9 89 KOSOVO ALBANIA 10 92 LATVIA ANDORRA 14 95 LIECHTENSTEIN ARMENIA 16 97 LITHUANIA AUSTRIA 19 100 LUXEMBOURG AZERBAIJAN 22 102 MACEDONIA BELARUS 26 105 MALTA BELGIUM 29 107 MOLDOVA BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 32 110 MONTENEGRO BULGARIA 35 113 NETHERLANDS CROATIA 39 116 NORWAY CYPRUS 42 119 POLAND CZECH REPUBLIC 45 122 PORTUGAL DENMARK 48 125 ROMANIA ESTONIA 51 128 RUSSIA BirdLife Europe and Central Asia is a partnership of 48 national conservation organisations and a leader in bird conservation. Our unique local to global FAROE ISLANDS DENMARK 54 132 SERBIA approach enables us to deliver high impact and long term conservation for the beneit of nature and people. BirdLife Europe and Central Asia is one of FINLAND 56 135 SLOVAKIA the six regional secretariats that compose BirdLife International. Based in Brus- sels, it supports the European and Central Asian Partnership and is present FRANCE 60 138 SLOVENIA in 47 countries including all EU Member States. With more than 4,100 staf in Europe, two million members and tens of thousands of skilled volunteers, GEORGIA 64 141 SPAIN BirdLife Europe and Central Asia, together with its national partners, owns or manages more than 6,000 nature sites totaling 320,000 hectares. GERMANY 67 145 SWEDEN GIBRALTAR UNITED KINGDOM 71 148 SWITZERLAND GREECE 72 151 TURKEY GREENLAND DENMARK 76 155 UKRAINE HUNGARY 78 159 UNITED KINGDOM ICELAND 81 162 European population sizes and trends STICHTING BIRDLIFE EUROPE GRATEFULLY ACKNOWLEDGES FINANCIAL SUPPORT FROM THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION.
    [Show full text]
  • Whales & Dolphins of Madeira
    Whales & Dolphins of Madeira Naturetrek Tour Report 1 - 5 September 2011 Short-finned Pilot Whales by George Reekie Atlantic Spotted Dolphin by Liz Scott Atlantic Spotted Dolphin by George Reekie Short-finned Pilot Whales by George Reekie Report compiled by Catherine Strong Images by kind courtesy of Liz Scott and George Reekie Naturetrek Cheriton Mill Cheriton Alresford Hampshire SO24 0NG England T: +44 (0)1962 733051 F: +44 (0)1962 736426 E: [email protected] W: www.naturetrek.co.uk Tour Report Whales & Dolphins of Madeira Tour Leaders: Catherine Strong Naturetrek Leader Luis Dias Local pelagic guide & naturalist Filipe Alves Local marine biologist guide Raquel Local pelagic guide João Local ornithologist & naturalist guide Participants: George Reekie Sue Reekie Sue Hill Liz Scott Lalage Grundy Matt Creasey David Carlton Alex Wilkins Richard Wilkins Helen Ingelbrecht Michelle Leahair Tour summary This holiday was characterised by lovely weather, calm seas, excellent company and some of the best dolphin- watching you could imagine! The highlight for many of us was a wonderful encounter with a group of Atlantic Spotted Dolphins which were bow-riding, tail-slapping and swimming around our boat, very close, for about 40 minutes. We also had a wonderful afternoon with local marine biologist Filipe Alves, who is doing a PhD on Madeira’s resident pod of Short-finned Pilot Whales. Filipe was able to name members of the group we were seeing, and give us a unique insight into their lives and histories. All but two of the group took part in a late-night optional squid-fishing trip, during which the sea was lit by bioluminescence and we could hear a pilot whale surface and blow next to us in the moonlight.
    [Show full text]
  • Adobe PDF, Job 6
    Noms français des oiseaux du Monde par la Commission internationale des noms français des oiseaux (CINFO) composée de Pierre DEVILLERS, Henri OUELLET, Édouard BENITO-ESPINAL, Roseline BEUDELS, Roger CRUON, Normand DAVID, Christian ÉRARD, Michel GOSSELIN, Gilles SEUTIN Éd. MultiMondes Inc., Sainte-Foy, Québec & Éd. Chabaud, Bayonne, France, 1993, 1re éd. ISBN 2-87749035-1 & avec le concours de Stéphane POPINET pour les noms anglais, d'après Distribution and Taxonomy of Birds of the World par C. G. SIBLEY & B. L. MONROE Yale University Press, New Haven and London, 1990 ISBN 2-87749035-1 Source : http://perso.club-internet.fr/alfosse/cinfo.htm Nouvelle adresse : http://listoiseauxmonde.multimania.
    [Show full text]