DOCSLIB.ORG

Valuation Report PO-25/2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Valuation Report PO-25/2018 Valuation Report PO-25/2018 A portfolio of real estate assets in Russia (St Petersburg, Moscow, Yekaterinburg) and Germany (Leipzig, Landshut, Munich) Prepared on behalf of LSR Group OJSC Date of issue: March 12, 2019 Contact details LSR Group OJSC, 15-H, liter Б, 36, Kazanskaya St, St Petersburg, 190031, Russia Lyudmila Fradina, Tel. +7 812 3856106, [email protected] Knight Frank Saint-Petersburg AO, Liter A, 3B, Mayakovskogo St., St Petersburg, 191025, Russia Svetlana Shalaeva, Tel. +7 812 3632222, [email protected] Valuation report │ A portfolio of real estate assets in St. Petersburg and Leningradskaya Oblast', Moscow and Moskovskaya Oblast’, Yekaterinburg, Russia and Leipzig, Landshut and Munich, Germany │ KF Ref: PO-25/2018 │ Prepared on behalf of LSR Group OJSC │ Date of issue: March 12, 2019 Page 1 Executive summary The executive summary below is to be used in conjunction with the valuation report to which it forms part and, is subject to the assumptions, caveats and bases of valuation stated herein. It should not be read in isolation. Location The Properties within the Portfolio of real estate assets to be valued are located in St. Petersburg and Leningradskaya Oblast', Moscow, Yekaterinburg, Russia and in Munich, Leipzig and Landshut, Germany. Description The Subject Property is represented by vacant, partly or completely developed land plots intended for residential and commercial development and commercial office buildings with related land plots. Areas ● Buildings – see the Schedule of Properties below ● Land plots – see the Schedule of Properties below Tenure ● Buildings – see the Schedule of Properties below ● Land plots – see the Schedule of Properties below Tenancies As of the valuation date from the data provided by the Client, the office properties are partially occupied by the short-term leaseholders according to the lease agreements. Valuation ● Commercial Properties. We’ve analysed both the office real estate market of St. considerations Petersburg and Moscow in general and the competitive environment of the Projects particularly to determine the market rental, vacancy and capitalization rates and OPEX for the Properties. We used this information to compare it with the data provided by the Client and to calculate the market rents after the lease expires if the current rent does not correspond to the market. Furthermore we’ve analysed the supply of the similar properties for sale. Thus the value was determined by reference to observable prices. ● Residential Properties. We’ve analysed both the residential real estate market of St. Petersburg and Leningradskaya Oblast’, Moscow, Yekaterinburg in general and the competitive environment of the Projects particularly to determine market prices, sales pace per quarter, price growth due to the inflation and project completion and construction costs. We used this information to compare it with the data provided by the Client and to calculate the market sales prices if the current prices do not correspond to the market. We assumed that sale prices information provided by the Client refers to the current average prices for the appropriate unit (apartment (per unit), Valuation report │ A portfolio of real estate assets in St. Petersburg and Leningradskaya Oblast', Moscow and Moskovskaya Oblast’, Yekaterinburg, Russia and Leipzig, Landshut and Munich, Germany │ KF Ref: PO-25/2018 │ Prepared on behalf of LSR Group OJSC │ Date of issue: March 12, 2019 Page 2 office or retail space (per sqm) or parking lot (per unit)) as if the property was commissioned at the valuation date. ● We used CPI forecast of Ministry of Economic Development of Russian Federation to index the construction costs. ● Residential Properties. We’ve analysed average residential prices dynamics by classes and extrapolated it on indexing the income from sales. ● We have taken into account the changes in Russian development legislation enforced since July 01, 2018 by using within our calculations of DCF models the financial leverage (project financing by a bank) and deponing of sales income till the completion of construction (funding on escrow accounts). The new scheme of development projects financing at the valuation date is mostly not applied in the market (only to single projects). So there is no statistics on its influence to the market and the results of its using in compare with previous situation. Also there is no accurate data on the criterias excluding projects them from obligatory transfer to the new rules of financing. But as it announces by official government speakers and experts the main criterias might be the stage of completion and the amount of sold areas. In light of the above we have applied the project financing scheme to the development projects from the portfolio those are at the beginning stages of construction and without previous sales or with a small share of sold areas. ● We have interviewed market participants (in particular development companies comparable to the Client) to determine the parametres of project financing offered by banks at the valuation date. As a result we have assumed the ratio of equity and loan as 20%/80% respectively, an average basic credit interest of 11% and a special credit interest of 5% applying when cumulative income from sales cover cumulative loan. ● All the general comments set out in this report refer to all the Properties within the portfolio if only special assumption is not provided. ● All considerations, assumptions and market commentaries regarding the properties located in Germany are attached in Appendix 6 “Valuation of properties located in Germany”. ● To the Tax Code of Russian Federation residential development performed by contractors is not subject to VAT excluding commercial and parking construction in case of charging VAT from selling prices. Thus VAT paid on construction and other development costs can be offset only proportionally to the costs incurred in non- residential construction. Commercial properties are subject to VAT in full (long-term leasehold of the land plot) or in respect of the price apportioned to the building (freehold of the land plot) if only the owner’s company is not using Simplified Tax System. Thus we have assumed that all development costs and prices provided by the Client include VAT (where applicable). In our value calculations we applied cash flows including VAT. ● More detailed valuation considerations for the particular Properties within the portfolio are expressed in the description placed in the attachments to the report. Valuation report │ A portfolio of real estate assets in St. Petersburg and Leningradskaya Oblast', Moscow and Moskovskaya Oblast’, Yekaterinburg, Russia and Leipzig, Landshut and Munich, Germany │ KF Ref: PO-25/2018 │ Prepared on behalf of LSR Group OJSC │ Date of issue: March 12, 2019 Page 3 Valuation date December 31, 2018 Market Value, 185,560,939,000 (One Hundred Eighty Five Billion Five Hundred Sixty Million Nine rounded Hundred Thirty Nine Thousand) RUB. Key assumptions ● The Subject Property is represented by vacant, partly or completely developed land plots intended for residential (residential premises) and commercial (apartments) development (hereinafter referred to as Residential Properties) and by commercial office buildings with related land plots (hereinafter referred to as Commercial Properties). It is assumed that the buildings under construction will be completed in accordance with the identified plans and specification provided by the Client. ● We have been provided with the Properties’ title information by the Client. Nevertheless we have not been provided with all the ownership certificates and land long-term lease agreements to verify it. Thus, in our valuation, we have assumed a good and marketable freehold (to the land plots and buildings) or long-term leasehold (to the land plots) title and that all documentation is satisfactorily drawn. ● Several legal entities are the owners of the Properties within the portfolio. The Client has informed us that all these legal entities belong to LSR Group OJSC. Thus we assume that 100% ownership of LSR Group OJSC is to be valued. ● To the title documents provided by the Client, part of the Properties is either the shared ownership or leasehold. For a shared ownership we assume it is the share of freehold tenure of the Client in all the properties to be assessed. For leasehold property we assume it is freehold tenure of the improvements and leasehold of the land to be assessed. ● We assume that all the utilities (heating, cold and hot water, electricity, sewerage / drainage and telecommunications) are available to the Property at the site borders. ● We assume that public and social (including school) facilities for the future development are sufficient. ● We have adopted the Developer’s estimate of project costs (project budget) within our assessment. ● Development project costs provided by the Client consist of already incurred and estimated outstanding costs. Since we provide our opinion on the value as of the valuation date, in our calculations we have adopted only estimated outstanding costs. ● Residential Properties. Sales proceeds provided by the Client consist of anticipated income from already sold but unpaid units and estimated income from the unsold units. In our DCF calculations we have adopted only income estimated from the unsold units. We assumed that a hypothetic potential purchaser of the Property would normally be entitled to all the Property rights including claim rights
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Expiry Notice
    Expiry Notice 19 January 2018 London Stock Exchange Derivatives Expiration prices for IOB Derivatives Please find below expiration prices for IOB products expiring in January 2018: Underlying Code Underlying Name Expiration Price AFID AFI DEVELOPMENT PLC 0.1800 ATAD PJSC TATNEFT 58.2800 FIVE X5 RETAIL GROUP NV 39.2400 GAZ GAZPROM NEFT 23.4000 GLTR GLOBALTRANS INVESTMENT PLC 9.9500 HSBK JSC HALYK SAVINGS BANK OF KAZAKHSTAN 12.4000 HYDR PJSC RUSHYDRO 1.3440 KMG JSC KAZMUNAIGAS EXPLORATION PROD 12.9000 LKOD PJSC LUKOIL 67.2000 LSRG LSR GROUP 2.9000 MAIL MAIL.RU GROUP LIMITED 32.0000 MFON MEGAFON 9.2000 MGNT PJSC MAGNIT 26.4000 MHPC MHP SA 12.8000 MDMG MD MEDICAL GROUP INVESTMENTS PLC 10.5000 MMK OJSC MAGNITOGORSK IRON AND STEEL WORKS 10.3000 MNOD MMC NORILSK NICKEL 20.2300 NCSP PJSC NOVOROSSIYSK COMM. SEA PORT 12.9000 NLMK NOVOLIPETSK STEEL 27.4000 NVTK OAO NOVATEK 128.1000 OGZD GAZPROM 5.2300 PLZL POLYUS PJSC 38.7000 RIGD RELIANCE INDUSTRIES 28.7000 RKMD ROSTELEKOM 6.9800 ROSN ROSNEFT OJSC 5.7920 SBER SBERBANK 18.6900 SGGD SURGUTNEFTEGAZ 5.2450 SMSN SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO 1148.0000 SSA SISTEMA JSFC 4.4200 SVST PAO SEVERSTAL 16.8200 TCS TCS GROUP HOLDING 19.3000 TMKS OAO TMK 5.4400 TRCN PJSC TRANSCONTAINER 8.0100 VTBR JSC VTB BANK 1.9370 Underlying code Underlying Name Expiration Price D7LKOD YEAR 17 DIVIDEND LUKOIL FUTURE 3.2643 YEAR 17 DIVIDEND MMC NORILSK NICKEL D7MNOD 1.8622 FUTURE D7OGZD YEAR 17 DIVIDEND GAZPROM FUTURE 0.2679 D7ROSN YEAR 17 DIVIDEND ROSNEFT FUTURE 0.1672 D7SBER YEAR 17 DIVIDEND SBERBANK FUTURE 0.3980 D7SGGD YEAR 17 DIVIDEND SURGUTNEFTEGAZ FUTURE 0.1000 D7VTBR YEAR 17 DIVIDEND VTB BANK FUTURE 0.0414 Members are asked to note that reports showing exercise/assignments should be available by approx.
    [Show full text]
  • Report to the Russian Government on the Visit to the Russian Federation
    CPT/Inf (2013) 41 Report to the Russian Government on the visit to the Russian Federation carried out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) from 21 May to 4 June 2012 The Russian Government has requested the publication of this report and of its response. The Government’s response is set out in document CPT/Inf (2013) 42. Strasbourg, 17 December 2013 - 3 - CONTENTS Copy of the letter transmitting the CPT's report............................................................................ 5 I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 7 A. Dates of the visit and composition of the delegation .............................................................. 7 B. Establishments visited .............................................................................................................. 8 C. Consultations held by the delegation and co-operation received ......................................... 9 D. Urgent action requested ......................................................................................................... 12 E. Monitoring of places of deprivation of liberty ..................................................................... 13 II. FACTS FOUND DURING THE VISIT AND ACTION PROPOSED .............................. 15 A. Persons held by the police or other law enforcement agencies ........................................... 15 1. Preliminary remarks .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Passport of St. Petersburg Industrial Zones
    The Committee for industrial policy and innovation of St. Petersburg Passport of St. Petersburg industrial zones 3-d edition 2015 Contents 1. Preamble..................................................................................................................................................................2 2. Industrial zones of St. Petersburg............................................................................................................................8 2.1. Area of industrial zones...................................................................................................................................9 2.2. Branch specialization of industrial zones according to town-planning regulations of industrial zones..............9 2.3. The Master plan of Saint-Petersburg (a scheme of a functional zoning of St. Petersburg)..............................................................................................10 2.4. The Rules of land use and building of St. Petersburg (a scheme of a territorial zoning of St. Petersburg).............................................................................................12 2.5. Extent of development of territories of industrial zones and the carried-out projects of engineering training of territories of industrial zones............................................................................................................................13 2.6. Documentation of planning areas of the industrial zones........................................................................13
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on Moscow Exchange Index Review
    Notes on Moscow Exchange index review Moscow Exchange approves the updated list of index components and free float ratios effective from 16 March 2018. X5 Retail Group N.V. (DRs) will be added to Moscow Exchange indices with the expected weight of 1.13 per cent. As these securities were offered initially, they were added without being in the waiting list under consideration. Thus, from 16 March the indices will comprise 46 (component stocks. The MOEX Russia and RTS Index moved to a floating number of component stocks in December 2017. En+ Group plc (DRs) will be in the waiting list to be added to Moscow Exchange indices, as their liquidity rose notably over recent three months. NCSP Group (ords) with low liquidity, ROSSETI (ords) and RosAgro PLC with their weights now below the minimum permissible level (0.2 per cent) will be under consideration to be excluded from the MOEX Russia Index and RTS Index. The Blue Chip Index constituents remain unaltered. X5 Retail Group (DRs), GAZ (ords), Obuvrus LLC (ords) and TNS energo (ords) will be added to the Broad Market Index, while Common of DIXY Group and Uralkali will be removed due to delisting expected. TransContainer (ords), as its free float sank below the minimum threshold of 5 per cent, and Southern Urals Nickel Plant (ords), as its liquidity ratio declined, will be also excluded. LSR Group (ords) will be incuded into SMID Index, while SOLLERS and DIXY Group (ords) will be excluded due to low liquidity ratio. X5 Retail Group (DRs) and Obuvrus LLC (ords) will be added to the Consumer & Retail Index, while DIXY Group (ords) will be removed from the Index.
    [Show full text]
  • WORKING PROGRAM of the VII Saint-Petersburg Educational
    WORKING PROGRAM of the VIIth Saint-Petersburg Educational Forum March 24, Thursday Time Event Venue Plenary Meeting of the VIIth The President Library Saint-Petersburg Educational Forum named after «Professional development and a social B.N. Yeltzin, 11.00 mission of a modern teacher» Senatskaya square, 3 Entrance according to the invitations Metro station “Admiralteyskaya” EVENTS OF THE VIIth SAINT-PETERSBURG EDUCATIONAL FORUM March 24, Thursday Time Event Venue “A modern teacher and his social mission” Saint-Petersburg City Panel discussion Palace of Youth Creativity, Nevskyi ave., 39 A 15.30 White columned hall Metro station “Nevsky Prospect”, «Gostinyi dvor” «A modern teacher: principal’s point of Elena Obraztsova view» International Academy Panel discussion of Music 15.30 Nevsky Prospekt, 35 Metro station “Nevsky Prospect”, «Gostinyi dvor” SOCIAL MISSION OF A TEACHER IN THE CONDITIONS OF MODERNIZATION OF EDUCATION March 22, Tuesday Time Event Venue “Innovation activity of a teacher in the School №509 of frames of realization of the Federal State Krasnoselskyi district Education Standards (FSES) of general Captain Greeschenko education” street, 3, building 1 The IVth All-Russian research and practical 12.00 Free bus from the Mero conference, plenary meeting station “Leninsky The main organizer: district”, “ Prospect “Institute of educational administration of the Veteranov” Russian Academy of Science”, informational and methodological center of Krasnoselskyi district of Saint-Petersburg, School №509 of Krasnoselskyi district March
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Heritage, Cinema, and Identity by Kiun H
    Title Page Framing, Walking, and Reimagining Landscapes in a Post-Soviet St. Petersburg: Cultural Heritage, Cinema, and Identity by Kiun Hwang Undergraduate degree, Yonsei University, 2005 Master degree, Yonsei University, 2008 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2019 Committee Page UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH DIETRICH SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES This dissertation was presented by Kiun Hwang It was defended on November 8, 2019 and approved by David Birnbaum, Professor, University of Pittsburgh, Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures Mrinalini Rajagopalan, Associate Professor, University of Pittsburgh, Department of History of Art & Architecture Vladimir Padunov, Associate Professor, University of Pittsburgh, Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures Dissertation Advisor: Nancy Condee, Professor, University of Pittsburgh, Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures ii Copyright © by Kiun Hwang 2019 Abstract iii Framing, Walking, and Reimagining Landscapes in a Post-Soviet St. Petersburg: Cultural Heritage, Cinema, and Identity Kiun Hwang, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2019 St. Petersburg’s image and identity have long been determined by its geographical location and socio-cultural foreignness. But St. Petersburg’s three centuries have matured its material authenticity, recognizable tableaux and unique urban narratives, chiefly the Petersburg Text. The three of these, intertwined in their formation and development, created a distinctive place-identity. The aura arising from this distinctiveness functioned as a marketable code not only for St. Petersburg’s heritage industry, but also for a future-oriented engagement with post-Soviet hypercapitalism. Reflecting on both up-to-date scholarship and the actual cityscapes themselves, my dissertation will focus on the imaginative landscapes in the historic center of St.
    [Show full text]
  • Significant Growth Potential for KONE in Russia
    KONE Capital Markets Day 2008 Significant growth potential for KONE in Russia Klaus Cawén Executive Vice President, M&A and Strategic Alliances, Russia, Legal Affairs Significant growth potential for KONE in Russia Rapidly growing economy One of the top ten elevator markets KONE uniquely positioned to drive growth Capital City, Moscow 2 May 7, 2008 © KONE Corporation l Capital Markets Day l Klaus Cawén Rapidly growing economy Strong GDP growth 140 million population – mostly urban High disposable income – high consumption Antey-III, Yekaterinburg 3 May 7, 2008 © KONE Corporation l Capital Markets Day l Klaus Cawén Strong GDP growth 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Note: Real GDP Growth Source: Bank of Finland 4 May 7, 2008 © KONE Corporation l Capital Markets Day l Klaus Cawén In addition to Moscow and St. Petersburg there are 11 cities with a population exceeding one million Cities by Number of Inhabitants (Millions) Moscow St Petersburg St Petersburg Novosibirsk Nizhny Novgorod Rural Moscow Yekaterinburg 26% Samara Omsk Nizhniy Novgorod Perm Perm Rostov-na-Donu Kazan Kazan Samara Yekaterinburg Ufa Urban Ufa Chelyabinsk Chelyabinsk 74% Rostov-on-Don Volgograd Omsk Volgograd 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Novosibirsk Source: United Nations Population density and urbanization statistics 5 May 7, 2008 © KONE Corporation l Capital Markets Day l Klaus Cawén Source: United Nations Population Division estimates and projections High disposable income Unleashed hungry urban consumers 13% flat income tax Growing middle class
    [Show full text]
  • Places in Moscow That Have to Be Visited
    Places in Moscow which have to be visited Оглавление SHOPPING CENTERS 3 GUM 3 TSUM 3 AVIAPARK 4 EVROPEISKY 4 AFIMALL CITY 4 MOSCOW PARKS. 5 GORKY CENTRAL PARK OF CULTURE AND LEISURE 5 TSARITSYNO MUSEUM-RESERVE 5 SOKOLNIKI PARK 6 MUZEON PARK OF ARTS 6 MUSEUMS 7 THE STATE DARWIN MUSEUM 7 THE STATE HISTORICAL MUSEUM 9 THE BASEL’S CATHERDRAL 10 MUSEUM OF THE PATRIOTIC WAR OF 1812 11 MUSEUM OF THE GREAT PATRIOTIC WAR, MOSCOW 12 THE STATE TRETYAKOV GALLERY 12 THE TRETYAKOV GALLERY ON KRYMSKY VAL 13 PRIVATE PHOTOGRAPHING IN THE GALLERY 14 ENGINEERING BUILDING AT LAVRUSHINSKY LANE, 12 15 PUSHKINS STATE MESEUM OF FINE ARTS 16 THE MUSEUM OF COSMONAUTICS 17 TOUR GROUPS 17 TOLSTOY HOUSE MUSEUM MOSCOW 18 Shopping centers GUM (pronounced [ˈɡum], an abbreviation of Russian: Глáвный универсáльный магазин, tr. Glávnyj Universáĺnyj Magazín literally "main universal store") With the façade extending for 242 m. along the eastern side of Red Square, the Upper Trading Rows (GUM) were built between 1890 and 1893 by Alexander Pomerantsev (responsible for architecture) and Vladimir Shukhov (responsible for engineering). The trapezoidal building features a combination of elements of Russian medieval architecture and a steel framework and glass roof, a similar style to the great 19th-century railway stations of London. William Craft Brumfield described the GUM building as "a tribute both to Shukhov's design and to the technical proficiency of Russian architecture toward the end of the 19th century”. The glass-roofed design made the building unique at the time of construction. The roof, the diameter of which is 14 m., looks light, but it is a firm construction made of more than 50,000 metal pods (about 819 short tons (743 t), capable of supporting snowfall accumulation.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Planning
    Leonid Lavrov, Elena Molotkova, Andrey Surovenkov — Pages 29–42 ON EVALUATING THE CONDITION OF THE SAINT PETERSBURG HISTORIC CENTER DOI: 10.23968/2500-0055-2020-5-3-29-42 Urban Planning ON EVALUATING THE CONDITION OF THE SAINT PETERSBURG HISTORIC CENTER Leonid Lavrov, Elena Molotkova*, Andrey Surovenkov Saint Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering Vtoraja Krasnoarmeyskaya st., 4, Saint Petersburg, Russia *Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract Introduction: This study was prompted by the introduction of the urban environment quality index into the system operated by the Russian Ministry of Construction Industry, Housing and Utilities Sector (Minstroy). We note that the ˝environment-centric˝ methodologies were already worked on and applied to housing studies in Leningrad as far back as during the 1970–1980s, and that the insights from these studies can now be used for analyzing the current state of the urban environment. Purpose of the study and methods: The information reviewed in this article gives us the first glimpse of the tangible urban environment in the historic center of Saint Petersburg. Many features of this part of the city are reminiscent of other European metropolises, but the fact that the historic center is split into three parts by vast waterways, that the construction began from the ground up in the middle of the wilderness, and that the active urban development phase lasted only a century and a half (from the 1760s to the 1910s), has a major part to play. Results: We use quantitative data to describe the features of the Saint Petersburg historic center and compare our findings to the features of European metropolises, across such parameters as spatial geometry, transportation and pedestrian links, and environmental conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Violence, Journalism, and the Russian State Building Project
    “ENEMIES NOT AMENABLE:” VIOLENCE, JOURNALISM, AND THE RUSSIAN STATE BUILDING PROJECT Liam J Anderson A thesis submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of Global Studies (Russian, Eurasian, and East European Studies) in the Graduate School. Chapel Hill 2019 Approved by: Robert Jenkins Erica Johnson Graeme Robertson © 2019 Liam J Anderson ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Liam J Anderson: “Enemies not Amenable:” Violence, Journalism, and the Russian State Building Project. (Under the direction of Graeme Robertson) Western coverage of Russian journalism often bemoans the current state of Russian independent media: shrinking every year, with an increasing number of websites, journals, and newspapers either forced to close following legal action or purchased by state-affiliated media companies. When Russian journalists appear in Western publications, it is often because of their murder of beating and the intense scrutiny that it receives from outside of Russia. While Russia is understood to be enormously dangerous for independent, critical journalists to operate in according to several journalism watchdogs, Russian independent media carries on, and remains a significant force in Russian civil society. Given the continued existence of independent Russian journalism, and its willingness to investigate the Russian state, why do certain members of the Russian media become targets of violence? This paper, through a case study approach, contends that, while no absolute cause can be identified all the time, journalists who attack the Russian state building project since Vladimir V Putin’s election to the Presidency in 2000 are at a greater risk of being attacked with their attackers receiving impunity for their actions.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Get to the Dormitory of Plekhanov Russian University of Economics (PRUE)
    How to get to the Dormitory of Plekhanov Russian University of Economics (PRUE) 1. International airports ............................................................................................................................ 2 1.1. Sheremetyevo International Airport ..................................................................................................... 2 1.2. Domodedovo Moscow Airport .............................................................................................................. 4 1.3. Vnukovo International Airport .............................................................................................................. 5 2. Train stations ......................................................................................................................................... 7 2.1. “Paveletskiy vokzal” train station ......................................................................................................... 7 2.2. “Kievsky vokzal” train station ............................................................................................................... 8 2.3. “Leningradskiy vokzal” train station .................................................................................................. 10 3. University’s main building ................................................................................................................... 12 4. Contract information ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Foreword from the Head of Moscow Metro 3 Events of the Year 4
    Foreword from the head of Moscow Metro 3 Events of the year 4 Performance indicators 20 Metro staff 30 Development and technical upgrade 44 Safety and security 50 International activity 56 Future development 62 1 The year 2012 can certainly be described as a year of great accomplishments, including the opening of new stations, reconstruction of existing facilities and metro technical systems. This year we have introduced a new section “Novogireevo” – “Novokosino” on the Kalininskaya line”, that allows now quick, convenient and reliable mode of transport to be provided to almost 200,000 inhabitants of the district. Besides, the metro map shows the long-awaited station ”Alma-Atinskaya” on the Zamoskvoretskaya line and the station “Pyatnitskoye shosse” in the Arbatsko-Pokrovskaya Foreword from the head line. The future of Moscow transport system is unthinkable without development of the metro, which plays a key role in the city’s public transport of Moscow Metro system. The Moscow Metro management carries out all the changes planned and appointed by the Moscow Government by paying as much attention to the demand of Muscovites and guests of the capital as possible. By 2020, 67 new stations are planned to be constructed. At present, we prioritize the construction of the Exterior interchange circuit line with the phased commissioning of line sections, the extension of the Lyublinsko-Dmitrovskaya line from station “Maryina roshcha” to the northern areas of the city by 2015. Also the construction of the new Kozhukhovskaya line from the station “Aviamotornaya” to the station “Nekrasovka. By 2017, the Kalininsko-Solntsevskaya line will be formed and operated between the station “Novokosino” and the districts, Solntsevo and Novo-Peredelkino.
    [Show full text]