Socony-Mobil Building, 150 East 4211Ct Street, Aka 130-170 East4211ct Street, 375-391 Lexington a Venue, 640- 658 Third Avenue, 131-155 East 41 St Street, Manhattan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Socony-Mobil Building, 150 East 4211Ct Street, Aka 130-170 East4211ct Street, 375-391 Lexington a Venue, 640- 658 Third Avenue, 131-155 East 41 St Street, Manhattan Landmarks Preservation Commission February 25, 2003; Designation List 341 LP-2117 Socony-Mobil Building, 150 East 4211ct Street, aka 130-170 East4211ct Street, 375-391 Lexington A venue, 640- 658 Third Avenue, 131-155 East 41 st Street, Manhattan. Built 1954-1956; Harrison & Abramowitz and John B. Peterkin, architects. Landmark Site: Borough of Manhattan Tax Map Block 1296, Lot 46. On October 1, 2002, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of the Socony-Mobil Building and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item No. 2). The hearing had been advertised in accordance with provisions of law. A representative of the building owner and fee holder spoke in opposition to designation. Five witnesses testified in favor of designation, including representatives of the Landmarks Conservancy, DoCoMoMo New York Tri-State, Modern Architecture Working Group, and the Historic Districts Council. In addition, the Commission received numerous letters in support of designation, from Manhattan Communjty Board Six, the Municipal Art Society, and the Roosevelt Island Historical Society. One letter opposed designation. At the time of designation, a representative of the fee holder spoke in support of designation. Summary A curtain wall of seven thousand embossed stainless steel panels gives the Socony-Mobil Building a unique presence on the midtown skyline. Constructed between 1954 and 1956, this impressive skyscraper fills an entire block, extending from 4211d to 41 st Streets, and from Lexington to Third Avenues. There are two entrances: the primary entrance is located on 4211d Street, and a smaller, secondary entrance faces Lexington A venue. Both are reached by passing beneath dramatic stainless steel arches that enclose generous exterior vestibules. At the center of the block, atop a three-story base, is a forty-two story tower, oriented from east to west, flanked by thirteen story wings. The driving force behind this speculative office project was Peter B. Ruffin, of the Galbreath Corporation, who convinced the owners of the site, the Goelet Estate, to agree to a long-term lease. A distinguished group of architects and engineers was assembled to guide the project, and major tenants were secured, including the Socony-Mobil Oil Company, which relocated from the financial district to occupy half the structure. Fully leased at the time of completion, the project's success bolstered the emergence of midtown and the area surrounding Grand Central Terminal as a major corporate address. The Socony-Mobil Building was designed in two phases: John B. Peterkin, a consultant to the Goelet estate, was responsible for the initial scheme, a set-back tower of brick and granite that conformed to the 1916 zoning ordinance. Harrison & Abramowitz, who were at the height of their prestige, joined the team in 1952 and over the next two years the elevations were completely redesigned using man-made materials. The structure that resulted is a vivid study in contrasts, juxtaposing deep blue structural glass with stainless steel, smooth and embossed surfaces, as well as curved and rectilinear forms. These juxtapositions give the Socony-Mobil Building its singular character; while the zoning-driven massing was typical of speculative office buildings erected during this period, the sparkling elevations gave the project a strong modem identity. Aside from modest alterations to the base and storefronts, this office tower remains one of the postwar era's - and neighborhood's most striking skyscrapers. DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS History of the Grand Central District "integrated factory" facing Lexington A venue, from Public transportation played an critical role in the the end of the Civil War to 1918.2 A subway entrance development of midtown Manhattan and the site was created on the block after 1915, located in a one­ occupied by the Socony-Mobil Building. The New story brick structure at 156-158 East 42"ct Street. Other York & Harlem Railroad Company, laid tracks along buildings during this period included several small Fourth (now Park) A venue in 1837, linking 14th and hotels, two theaters, and a garage.3 125th Streets. Grand Central Depot (demolished) Under Robert Goelet (1880-1966), the family opened on 4211 ct Street in 1870. The new terminal increased its holdings on the block, purchasing six lots consisted of a vaulted iron shed, as well as a Second near the comer of Third Avenue and 4l't Street during Empire style headhouse with public entrances facing the 1940s.4 This acquisition was made with the 4211 ct Street and Vanderbilt A venue. This orientation expectation that the end of elevated rail service in made the blocks to the east considerably less desirable, Manhattan was near. With the closing of the Second and in subsequent decades stables, warehouses, and Avenue line in 1942, the Goelets correctly anticipated factories were built here. that the Third A venue el would follow and as the Elevated railway service was introduced on Third Socony-Mobil Building approached completion in Avenue (between 67th Street and South Ferry) in 1956, service ended and the iron structure was August 1878, and along Second Avenue (north of z3rct demolished. As the last pillars were removed at 4211 ct Street) in 1880. 1 At 4211 ct Street, a spur line was Street, the New York Times reported: constructed to the west, linking the "els" directly to Final removal of the shadowy el cleared the Grand Central Depot. The IRT subway, which ran way for a seven and one half mile, widened, from City Hall to 4211ct Street, and, for a time, west to tree-lined, flourescent lighted, boulevard of Times Square, made the spur line obsolete and in 1923 glistening office buildings and fine it was demolished. No longer darkened by trains and apartments and shops that will be new in track, the blocks between Park and Third A venues everything but name.5 became substantially more attractive to commercial development. In subsequent years, the Grand Central Over the next three decades, many impressive district became prime real estate and a significant commercial structures would, indeed, be erected along group of office buildings were built along 4znct Street, both sides of Third A venue, especially near 59t11 Street, including the Bowery Savings Bank (1921-23, 1931- 53 rct Street, and 4211 ct Street, where multiple subway 33), Chanin Building (1927-29) and Chrysler Building lines are present. (1928-30, all designated New York City Landmarks). The blocks east of Lexington Avenue, however, John B. Peterkin (1886-1969) remained relatively free of new development. Aside As early as 1942, the Goelet Estate began to from the Daily News Building (1929-30, a designated contemplate redevelopment of the site. John B. New York City Landmark and Interior), the blocks Peterkin, an architect specializing in apartment houses adjoining the Second and Third A venue els were and civic structures, was hired as an consultant. Most occupied by modest, low-rise structures. of his designs were relatively free of ornament and he often worked in a st1ipped Classical or streamlined The Site Modeme style. His Manhattan commissions included: The Socony-Mobil Building was built on land 53 Park Place (1922, in association with Cross & leased from the Goelet Estate. Francis Goelet Cross); 1016 Fifth Avenue (1927, part of the emigrated from Amsterdam to the colony of New Metropolitan Museum Historic District); the Airlines York in 1676. Prominent among his descendants were Building (1939-40, demolished), across from Grand Peter Goelet (1800-79) and Robert Goelet (1809-79) Central Terminal on 4211 ct Street, the East Side Airlines who accumulated large fortunes in banking and real Terminal (1950-51, demolished), located on First estate. Both brothers were founders of Chemical Bank A venue, close to the Midtown Tunnel; and the New and at one time it was reported that the family owned York Coliseum (1953-54, in association with Leon & more than fifty-five acres on Manhattan's east side. In Lionel Levy, demolished). 1848, they began acquiring lots on the block, near the Peterkin developed the first scheme for the site in comer of Lexington A venue and 4znct Street. The land the early 1940s.6 With its proximity to Grand Central was leased to various tenants, most notably Pottier & Terminal he suggested a related use, consisting of an Stymus, the furniture designers, who operated an office tower built above an airlines depot. Oriented 2 from east to west, his plan recalled various buildings Harrison & Abramowitz12 at Rockefeller Center. Above the third floor was a The project gained substantial prestige through the bold set-back, creating a platform from which a thirty­ addition of Harrison & Abramowitz. The firm had story tower, flanked by lower wings, would rise. At many important buildings to its credit and Wallace K. this level, a roof garden was envisioned. Despite a Harrison (1895-1981) had played a leading role in the "closet full of plans," the project did not proceed. creation of Rockefeller Center, first, with Corbett, While major corporations and developers expressed Harrison and MacMurray, and later, as Harrison & reservations about developing such a large site, other Fouilhoux. Max Abramowitz (b. 1908) joined the firm parties could not meet the Estate's demand that they in mid-1930s and following the death of J. Andre produce "blue-ribbon" tenants with long-term leases. 7 Fouilhoux (1879-1945), it was called Harrison & Abramowitz. The Developer During the late 1940s, Harrison developed a The driving force behind the Socony-Mobil reputation as a conciliator, able to appease opposing Building was Peter B. Ruffin, vice-president of the views and design impulses. His commissions for Galbreath Corporation.8 Born in Virginia, he moved to corporate and institutional clients display a rare gift for New York in 1927 and became one of the city' s most merging traditional and modem aesthetics.
Recommended publications
  • Landmarks Preservation Commission November 22, 2016, Designation List 490 LP-2579
    Landmarks Preservation Commission November 22, 2016, Designation List 490 LP-2579 YALE CLUB OF NEW YORK CITY 50 Vanderbilt Avenue (aka 49-55 East 44th Street), Manhattan Built 1913-15; architect, James Gamble Rogers Landmark site: Borough of Manhattan Tax Map Block 1279, Lot 28 On September 13, 2016, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation of the Yale Club of New York City and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site. The hearing had been duly advertised in accordance with provisions of law. Six people spoke in support of designation, including representatives of the Yale Club of New York City, Manhattan Borough President Gale A. Brewer, Historic Districts Council, New York Landmarks Conservancy, and the Municipal Art Society of New York. The Real Estate Board of New York submitted written testimony in opposition to designation. State Senator Brad Hoylman submitted written testimony in support of designation. Summary The Yale Club of New York City is a Renaissance Revival-style skyscraper at the northwest corner of Vanderbilt Avenue and East 44th Street. For more than a century it has played an important role in East Midtown, serving the Yale community and providing a handsome and complementary backdrop to Grand Central Terminal. Constructed on property that was once owned by the New York Central Railroad, it stands directly above two levels of train tracks and platforms. This was the ideal location to build the Yale Club, opposite the new terminal, which serves New Haven, where Yale University is located, and at the east end of “clubhouse row.” The architect was James Gamble Rogers, who graduated from Yale College in 1889 and attended the Ecole des Beaux Arts in Paris during the 1890s.
    [Show full text]
  • CENTURY APARTMENTS, 25 Central Park West, Borough of Manhattan
    Landmarks Preservation Commission July 9, 1985, Designation List 181 LP-1517 CENTURY APARTMENTS, 25 Central Park West, Borough of Manhattan. Built 1931; architect Irwin S. Chanin. Landmark Site: Borough of Manhattan Tax Map Block 1115, Lot 29. On September 11, 1984, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of the Century Apartments and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item No. 11). The hearing had been duly advertised in accordance with the provisions of law. Thirteen witnesses spoke in favor of designation. There were no speakers in opposition to designation. DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS The Century Apartments, extending along the entire blockfront of Central Park West between West 62nd Street to West 63rd Street, anchors the southern end of one of New York City's finest residential boulevards. With twin towers rising 300 feet from the street, this building is one of a small group of related structures that help give Central Park West its distinctive silhouette. Designed in 1930 by Irwin S. Chanin of the Chanin Construction Company, the Century Apartments is among the most sophisticated residential Art Deco buildings in New York and is a major work by one of America's pioneering Art Deco designers. Built in 1931, the Century was among the last buildings erected as part of the early 20th-century redevelopment of Central Park West. Central Park West, a continuation of Eighth Avenue, runs along the western edge of Central Park. Development along this prime avenue occurred very slowly , lagging sub­ stantially behind the general development of the Upper West Side.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting Planner's Guide 2019
    AN ADVERTISING SUPPLEMENT TO CRAin’S NEW YORK BUSINESS MEETING Planner’S GUIDE 2019 YOUR RESOURCE FOR SUCCESSFUL MEETINGS AND EVENTS IF YOU ARE A MEETING or event hotels in the New York City area. than other channels. A lot of that a trend toward “bleisure,” the walk the line between creating planner you are part of an elite, Our goal is to keep you ahead value comes from networking in combining of business travel and experiences that resonate with multi-talented group. Being a of the curve and one up on the person. One-on-one meetings leisure. Today’s event attendees the whole audience, as well as planner calls for a wide range of competition in 2019. have become a hot commodity; expect event planners to be equal with individual attendees. expert skills and qualifications, To that end, here are some research has shown that, after parts manager and travel agent. such as managing, budgeting and of the meeting and event trends content, networking is the sec- Everything from programming to GIVE THEM execution, knowledge of tech- to consider when planning ond biggest motivator for event catering is likely to reference the A SHOW nology, creative talent—not to this year: attendees today. And the term locality and culture of the desti- 2019 also sees a trend for the mention leadership, adaptability, “networking” covers everything nation both on-site and off. “festivalization” of meetings and people skills, patience and energy IN YOUR FACE from spontaneous conversations events. A growing number of (to name just a few). When you “Face time” is the buzzword to huddle rooms and meet-and- TAKE IT PERSONAlly gatherings are adding perfor- possess all of these qualities you in meetings and events for greets.
    [Show full text]
  • Edgar De Leon, Esq. the De Leon Firm, PLLC 26 Broadway, Suite 1700 New York, NY 10004 [email protected] (212) 747-0200
    Edgar De Leon, Esq. The De Leon Firm, PLLC 26 Broadway, Suite 1700 New York, NY 10004 [email protected] (212) 747-0200 Edgar De Leon is a graduate of the Fordham University School of Law (J.D.) and Hunter College (M.S. & B.A.). He has worked as a Detective-Sergeant and an attorney for the New York City Police Department (NYPD). His assignments included investigating hate-motivated crimes for the Chief of Department and allegations of corruption and serious misconduct for the Deputy Commissioner of Internal Affairs and the Chief of Detectives. While assigned to the NYPD Legal Bureau, Mr. De Leon litigated both criminal and civil matters on behalf of the Police Department. He conducted legal research on matters concerning police litigation and initiatives and advised members of the department on matters relating to the performance of their official duties. Mr. De Leon has counseled NYPD executives and law enforcement and community-based organizations domestically and internationally concerning policy and procedure development in police-related subjects, including cultural diversity. In 2005, Mr. De Leon was part of an international team that traveled to Spain and Hungary. Working under the auspices of the Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR), a subdivision of the Organization for Cooperation and Strategy in Europe (OCSE), the team drafted a curriculum and implemented the first-ever training program for police officers in the European Union concerning the handling and investigation of hate crimes. In January 1999, Mr. De Leon retired from the NYPD with the rank of Sergeant S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • TM 3.1 Inventory of Affected Businesses
    N E W Y O R K M E T R O P O L I T A N T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O U N C I L D E M O G R A P H I C A N D S O C I O E C O N O M I C F O R E C A S T I N G POST SEPTEMBER 11TH IMPACTS T E C H N I C A L M E M O R A N D U M NO. 3.1 INVENTORY OF AFFECTED BUSINESSES: THEIR CHARACTERISTICS AND AFTERMATH This study is funded by a matching grant from the Federal Highway Administration, under NYSDOT PIN PT 1949911. PRIME CONSULTANT: URBANOMICS 115 5TH AVENUE 3RD FLOOR NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10003 The preparation of this report was financed in part through funds from the Federal Highway Administration and FTA. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The contents of this report reflect the views of the author who is responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do no necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Federal Highway Administration, FTA, nor of the New York Metropolitan Transportation Council. This report does not constitute a standard, specification or regulation. T E C H N I C A L M E M O R A N D U M NO.
    [Show full text]
  • Philharmonic Hall Lincoln Center F O R T H E Performing Arts
    PHILHARMONIC HALL LINCOLN CENTER F O R T H E PERFORMING ARTS 1968-1969 MARQUEE The Chamber Music Society of Lincoln Center is Formed A new PERFORMiNG-arts institution, The Chamber Music Society of Lincoln Center, will begin its first season of con­ certs next October with a subscription season of 16 concerts in eight pairs, run­ ning through early April. The estab­ lishment of a chamber music society completes the full spectrum of perform­ ing arts that was fundamental to the original concept of Lincoln Center. The Chamber Music Society of Lin­ coln Center will have as its home the Center’s new Alice Tully Hall. This intimate hall, though located within the new Juilliard building, will be managed by Lincoln Center as an independent Wadsworth Carmirelli Treger public auditorium, with its own entrance and box office on Broadway between 65th and 66th Streets. The hall, with its 1,100 capacity and paneled basswood walls, has been specifically designed for chamber music and recitals. The initial Board of Directors of the New Chamber Music Society will com­ prise Miss Alice Tully, Chairman; Frank E. Taplin, President; Edward R. Ward­ well, Vice-President; David Rockefeller, Jr., Treasurer; Sampson R. Field, Sec­ retary; Mrs. George A. Carden; Dr. Peter Goldmark; Mrs. William Rosen- wald and Dr. William Schuman. The Chamber Music Society is being organ­ ized on a non-profit basis and, like other cultural institutions, depends upon voluntary contributions for its existence. Charles Wadsworth has been ap­ pointed Artistic Director of The Cham­ ber Music Society of Lincoln Center. The Society is the outgrowth of an in­ tensive survey of the chamber music field and the New York chamber music audience, conducted by Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Losing Its Way: the Landmarks Preservation Commission in Eclipse
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works Publications and Research John Jay College of Criminal Justice 2018 Losing Its Way: the Landmarks Preservation Commission in Eclipse Jeffrey A. Kroessler CUNY John Jay College How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/jj_pubs/245 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] Reprinted from Environmental Law in New York with permission. Copyright 2018 Matthew Bender & Company, Inc., a LexisNexis company. All rights reserved. Developments in Federal Michael B. Gerrard and State Law Editor ENVIRONMENTAL LAW IN NEW YORK Volume 29, No. 08 August 2018 Losing Its Way: The Landmarks Preservation Commission in Eclipse (Part 1 of 2) Viewpoint Jeffrey A. Kroessler have been designated. Part 2 will also discuss issues related to IN THIS ISSUE the membership of the Landmarks Preservation Commission as Losing Its Way: The Landmarks Preservation Commission in well as the Commission’s role in regulatory decision-making. Eclipse (Part 1 of 2) ...................................................................... 161 LEGAL DEVELOPMENTS ......................................................... 167 The City Club of New York has serious concerns about how ^ ASBESTOS......................................................................167 the Landmarks Preservation Commission (Commission or LPC) ^ CLIMATE
    [Show full text]
  • Ramon Gilsanz Is a Founding Partner in the Firm Gilsanz Murray Steficek
    Ramon Gilsanz, PE, SE, F.SEI, F.ASCE, Hon. AIA NYS Ramon Gilsanz is a founding Partner of Gilsanz Murray Steficek. In his over 35 year career as a structural engineer he has worked on a wide range of projects, both new construction and renovation. Among the new construction projects, Mr. Gilsanz has worked on residential towers, hospitals, office buildings, industrial facilities, and specialty projects such as art installations. He has been involved in renovating buildings, theaters and museums that have been deemed historical landmarks. Mr. Gilsanz is active in making contributions to the structural engineering industry through involvement in professional societies. He is currently serving as Chair of the New York City Department of Buildings’ Structural Technical Committee, a group responsible for the revisions of the New York City Building Code; Director for the New York/Northeast Chapter of Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI); Chair of the American Council of Engineering Companies of New York Metropolitan Section Structural Code Committee; Past-Chairman of the code committee of the Structural Engineers Association of New York (SEAoNY), and he is working on several committees for the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), including ASCE 7-16 Minimum Design Loads For Buildings And Other Structures, American Concrete Institute (ACI), and American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) where he currently sits on the AISC Committee on Specifications. He also participated on the Code Advisory Committee for the National Council of Structural Engineers (NCSEA) and numerous New York City Committees on Standards. Mr. Gilsanz served on the Urban Green Council's Building Resiliency Task Force (BRTF) following Hurricane Sandy in October 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Landmarks Preservation Commission April 18, 2006, Designation List 372 LP-2185
    Landmarks Preservation Commission April 18, 2006, Designation List 372 LP-2185 STEWART & COMPANY BUILDING, 402-404 Fifth Avenue (aka 2 West 37th Street), Manhattan. Built 1914; [Whitney] Warren & [Charles D.] Wetmore, architects; George A. Fuller Co., builders; New York Architectural Terra Cotta Company, terra cotta manufacturer. Landmark Site: Borough of Manhattan Tax Map Block 838, Lot. 48 On October 18, 2005, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of Stewart & Company building and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item No. 2). The hearing had been duly advertised in accordance with the provision of law. Three people spoke in favor of designation, including representatives of the property’s owners. In addition, the Commission received two letters in support of designation. Summary The Stewart & Company Building, designed by Warren and Wetmore, is one of the firm’s most unusual designs. The 1914 building reflects the unusual combination of diverse influences such as the 18th century British neo-Classical movement and the late 19th century Chicago School of Architecture style. The blue and white ornament of the terra cotta cladding is reminiscent of the 18th century neo-Classical movement in England, and specifically two of the most important proponents of the movement, Josiah Wedgwood and Robert Adam. Characteristic of the Chicago style are steel frame construction, masonry cladding that was usually terra cotta, large areas of glazing, usually featuring tripartite windows known as Chicago windows, and a tripartite vertical design. As the commercial center of Manhattan moved uptown so did the location of department stores.
    [Show full text]
  • 26 Broadway Educational Campus
    The landmarked building in Lower Manhattan gets a second life as a 26 Broadway school thanks to its steel structure and an innovative adaptive reuse plan. Educational FOR THE PAST SEVERAL YEARS, the landmarked transformed from the oil giant’s Carrère and Hast- ings-designed headquarters into a lively academic Campus complex for secondary students in Lower Manhat- tan. The third academic institution to be located in the building, it occupies 104,000 square feet of and adds nearly 700 high school seats to what SCA complex, which also includes the Urban Assembly - Ciardullo Associates, who has worked extensively this longstanding relationship is why Ciardullo was allowed to have a bit of fun with the campus, trans- forming an underused mechanical courtyard into a dramatic double-height, steel-framed gymnasium. most of the building’s existing structure is steel, for a gymnasium into the columns already in place. literally put the beams anywhere within the steel structure. If you had a concrete structure, you’d have a problem analyzing it structurally because you don’t know what reinforcing steel is in the concrete frame. You would have to drill into the concrete to the building, we could create a large space that could function as a gym and we could bring in light through a skylight,” says Ciardullo. Though the idea of giving Manhattan students an indoor gym was a novel one, the execution of it proved relatively window openings two stories above street level, the open courtyard space. There, the beams were welded at one end to existing steel columns on the portion of the building built in 1921.
    [Show full text]
  • New York Citytm
    The Internationalist ® The Top 10 Guide to New York The Top 10 Guide to New York CityTM The Internationalist 96 Walter Street/Suite 200 Boston, MA 02131 USA The Internationalist • www.internationalist.com • 617-354-7755 1 The Internationalist ® The Top 10 Guide to New York The Internationalist® International Business, Investment and Travel Published by: The Internationalist Publishing Company 96 Walter Street/Suite 200 Boston, MA 02131, USA Tel: 617-354-7722 [email protected] Author: Patrick W. Nee Copyright © 2001 by PWN The Internationalist is a Registered Trademark. The Top 10 Guide to New York City, The Top 10 Travel Guides, The Top 10 Guides are Trademarks of the Internationalist Publishing Company. All right are reserved under International, Pan-American and Pan-Asian Conventions. No part of this book, no lists, no maps or illustration may be reproduced in any form without the written permission of the publisher. All rights vigorously enforced. ISBN: 1-891382-21-7 Special Sales: Books of the Internationalist Publishing Company are available for bulk purchases at special discounts for sales promotions, corporate identity programs or premiums. The Internationalist Publishing Company publishes books on international business, investment and travel. For further information contact the Special Sales department at: Special Sales, The Internationalist, 96 Walter Street/Suite 200, Boston, MA 02131. The Internationalist Publishing Company 96 Walter Street/Suite 200 Boston, MA 02131 USA Tel: 617-354-7722 [email protected] e-mail: [email protected] web site: http://www.internationalist.com The Internationalist • www.internationalist.com • 617-354-7755 2 The Internationalist ® The Top 10 Guide to New York Welcome to New York City.
    [Show full text]
  • Las Vegas Optic, 01-31-1914 the Optic Publishing Co
    University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository Las Vegas Daily Optic, 1896-1907 New Mexico Historical Newspapers 1-31-1914 Las Vegas Optic, 01-31-1914 The Optic Publishing Co. Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/lvdo_news Recommended Citation The Optic Publishing Co.. "Las Vegas Optic, 01-31-1914." (1914). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/lvdo_news/2215 This Newspaper is brought to you for free and open access by the New Mexico Historical Newspapers at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Las Vegas Daily Optic, 1896-1907 by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. I 1 , i i I s V. IT'S getting to a L '1 i : toula'ht and Sun- y ! I It! player worts near-- day; pot. 11 in U chansie l! l 1. 3 ' all year. Spring tm.c in we. ... 1 temper! lug begins next snouCj. - 'It. -- EXCLUCIVtl Ai XOGIATCD PKV- "3 LEAGGD WIRE TELEGRAPH SERVICE V01,. XXXV. NO. 67. LAS VEGAS DAILY . 'TIC, SATURDAY, JANUARY 31, 1914. CITY EDITION. bench built- along the sides of the agent acting for the Victor American h cabin. I slid and scrambled alter her. WINTER HOC: ISLAND TO TRAIN FIRED 0 Fuel company, It is said. "TALE! STOPPED .When I took hold of her she scream- IfEMI El LINES" LIR ed and to her poor arm. Judge Advocate Argues pointed right It was broken and hanging limp. Trinidad, Colo., Jan. 31. The entire VHEH If'HEARD " 0 BY CROWD OF session in disttict court NECESSITY TO 'Don't touch me,' she sirea ned' IKES CUM Ill iiIZE morning today 'For God's sake let me die'.' was devoted to a detailed reply of "I told her she would have to come Major E.
    [Show full text]