DOCSLIB.ORG

A Commentary on the September 2011 Eritrea Operational Guidance Note

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Commentary on the September 2011 Eritrea Operational Guidance Note THIS DOCUMENT SHOULD BE USED AS A TOOL FOR IDENTIFYING RELEVANT COUNTRY OF ORIGIN INFORMATION. IT SHOULD NOT BE SUBMITTED AS EVIDENCE TO THE UK BORDER AGENCY, THE TRIBUNAL OR OTHER DECISION MAKERS IN ASYLUM APPLICATIONS OR APPEALS. November 2011 A commentary on the September 2011 Eritrea Operational Guidance Note This commentary identifies what the ‘Still Human Still Here’ coalition considers to be the main inconsistencies and omissions between the currently available country of origin information (COI) and case law on Eritrea and the conclusions reached in the September 2011 Eritrea Operational Guidance Note (OGN), issued by the UK Border Agency. Where we believe inconsistencies have been identified, the relevant section of the OGN is highlighted in blue. An index of full sources of the COI referred to in this commentary is also provided at the end of the document. This commentary is a guide for legal practitioners and decision-makers in respect of the relevant COI, by reference to the sections of the Operational Guidance Note on Eritrea issued in September 2011. To access the complete OGN on Eritrea go to: http://www.bia.homeoffice.gov.uk/sitecontent/documents/policyandlaw/countryspecificasylum policyogns/ The document should be used as a tool to help to identify relevant COI and the COI referred to can be considered by decision makers in assessing asylum applications and appeals. This document should not be submitted as evidence to the UK Border Agency, the Tribunal or other decision makers in asylum applications or appeals. However, legal representatives are welcome to submit the COI referred to in this document to decision makers (including judges) to help in the accurate determination of an asylum claim or appeal. The COI referred to in this document is not exhaustive and should always be complemented by case-specific COI research. Contents 3.6 Pentecostals and Jehovah’s Witnesses p. 3 o Treatment of other unregistered and registered religious p. 3 groups 3.7 Military Service p. 13 o Treatment of female conscripts p. 21 o Treatment of family members of deserters/draft evaders p. 23 3.8 Members of Opposition Political Groups p. 25 o Treatment of family members of perceived or real political p. 32 opponents or government critics o Treatment of journalists, media professionals, academics, p. 33 civil society activists, trade unionists, labour rights activists 1 THIS DOCUMENT SHOULD BE USED AS A TOOL FOR IDENTIFYING RELEVANT COUNTRY OF ORIGIN INFORMATION. IT SHOULD NOT BE SUBMITTED AS EVIDENCE TO THE UK BORDER AGENCY, THE TRIBUNAL OR OTHER DECISION MAKERS IN ASYLUM APPLICATIONS OR APPEALS. and certain minority ethnic groups 3.9 Persons of mixed Ethiopian/Eritrean Origin p. 44 3.10 Claimed Illegal Exit from Eritrea p. 46 3.11 Prison conditions p. 50 2.3 Actors of Protection p. 57 2.4 Internal relocation p. 57 4.3 Minors p. 61 5. Returns p. 71 Index of sources p. 75 It should be noted that only limited publicly available sources report on Eritrea since freedom of expression and association is strictly curtailed and no real opposition movement, NGOs or free media exists. Eritrea has been referred to by the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom in April 2011 as the “North Korea of Africa” and the “most repressive state on the continent”.1 In addition, in both its Quarterly Update and its 2010 annual report, the FCO classified Eritrea as a country “where we have particular concerns about human rights”, and noted that due to extended restrictions on diplomats, international agencies, NGOs and journalists represented in Eritrea travelling outside of Asmara it was “even more difficult to gather accurate data on the human rights situation outside of the capital”.2 That only limited information emerges out of Eritrea was also confirmed in July 2011 by the UN Report of the Monitoring Group on Somalia and Eritrea, which stated that “Eritrea poses a particular challenge with respect to information gathering. Due to restrictions on the movement of foreigners, including United Nations personnel and diplomats within the country, as well as the total absence of independent media or non-governmental organizations, the Monitoring Group has relied primarily on diaspora sources in order to obtain necessary information”.3 1 US Commission on International Religious Freedom, United States Commission on International Religious Freedom Annual Report 2011: Eritrea, 28/04/2011. 2 See both UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO), Human rights in Countries of Concern: Quarterly Update on Eritrea, March 2011, 31/03/2011 and UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO), Human Rights and Democracy: The 2010 Foreign & Commonwealth Office Report (Eritrea excerpt), 31/03/2011, section VII: Human Rights in Countries of Concern. 3 UN Security Council, Report of the Monitoring Group on Somalia and Eritrea pursuant to Security Council resolution 1916 (2010), 18/07/2011, Introduction, B. Methodology, para. 10. 2 THIS DOCUMENT SHOULD BE USED AS A TOOL FOR IDENTIFYING RELEVANT COUNTRY OF ORIGIN INFORMATION. IT SHOULD NOT BE SUBMITTED AS EVIDENCE TO THE UK BORDER AGENCY, THE TRIBUNAL OR OTHER DECISION MAKERS IN ASYLUM APPLICATIONS OR APPEALS. 3. Main categories of claims 3.6 Pentecostals and Jehovah’s Witnesses Treatment of other unregistered and registered religious groups Excerpt from the September 2011 Eritrea OGN 3.6.8 State persecution of non-sanctioned religions such as Pentecostalism, and also of the Jehovah‟s Witness‟ community is systematic and widespread throughout Eritrea. If it is accepted that the claimant is a practising Pentecostal or a Jehovah‟s Witness, and they have demonstrated that they will have a well-founded fear of persecution, their claim is likely to engage the UK‟s obligation under the 1951 Convention. The grant of asylum in such cases us [sic] therefore likely to be appropriate except where in particular individual cases there are reasons not to do so. The guidance provided in the OGN is limited to those claimants who are either practising Pentecostals or Jehovah’s Witnesses. Yet, COI included in a previous paragraph within the OGN and COI available in the public domain and presented below suggest that other religious groups, both registered and unregistered, also face ill-treatment amounting to persecution at the hands of the Eritrean authorities. Very limited information is provided on the treatment of other religious groups within the OGN in paragraph 3.6.4 from only one source, the U.S. Department of State’s latest annual International Religious Freedom Report 2010. However, the original source provides much more information on the treatment of both registered and unregistered religious groups as follows: U.S. Department of State, International Religious Freedom Report 2010: Eritrea, 17/11/2010 [...] The government's record on religious freedom remained poor. The government continued to harass and detain thousands of members of unregistered religious groups and retained substantial control over the four registered religious groups. The government failed to approve religious groups that fulfilled the registration requirements and arrested persons during religious gatherings. The government subjected religious prisoners to harsher conditions and held them for long periods of time, without due process. There continued to be reports of forced recantations of faith, torture of religious prisoners, and deaths while in custody. [...] Section II. Status of Government Respect for Religious Freedom Legal/Policy Framework [...]The government has officially registered four religious groups: the Eritrean Orthodox Church, the Evangelical (Lutheran) Church of Eritrea, Islam, and the Roman Catholic Church. The government has not approved the registrations of the Meherte Yesus Evangelical Presbyterian Church, Seventh-day Adventist Church, Faith Mission Church, and Baha'i Faith, despite their being fully compliant with the registration requirements since 2002. Those registrations required only the president's signature for full approval. [...] Restrictions on Religious Freedom The government's record on religious freedom remained poor. The government continued to harass and detain members of registered and unregistered religious groups and retained significant control over the four registered religious groups. [...] Following a 2002 government decree that all religious groups must register or cease all religious activities, religious facilities that did not belong to the four officially recognized religious groups were forced to close. Some local authorities allowed unregistered groups to worship in homes or rented spaces, whereas others did not allow such groups to meet. During the reporting period, the government continued to disrupt home-based worship and arrested those who hosted home prayer meetings. In December 2009 the UN imposed sanctions on the country for arming, training, and equipping armed groups and their members including al-Shabaab (designated as a foreign terrorist organization), that 3 THIS DOCUMENT SHOULD BE USED AS A TOOL FOR IDENTIFYING RELEVANT COUNTRY OF ORIGIN INFORMATION. IT SHOULD NOT BE SUBMITTED AS EVIDENCE TO THE UK BORDER AGENCY, THE TRIBUNAL OR OTHER DECISION MAKERS IN ASYLUM APPLICATIONS OR APPEALS. aimed to destabilize the region, and for occupying disputed territory on its border with Djibouti. Following the sanctions government-controlled media branded the UN and Western governments as imperialist entities. In this context unrecognized religious groups, which have long been characterized as imperialist
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2018 Global Go to Think Tank Index Report1
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons TTCSP Global Go To Think aT nk Index Reports Think aT nks and Civil Societies Program (TTCSP) 1-2019 2018 Global Go To Think aT nk Index Report James G. McGann University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/think_tanks Part of the International and Area Studies Commons McGann, James G., "2018 Global Go To Think aT nk Index Report" (2019). TTCSP Global Go To Think Tank Index Reports. 16. https://repository.upenn.edu/think_tanks/16 2019 Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this report may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by information storage or retrieval system, without written permission from the University of Pennsylvania, Think aT nks and Civil Societies Program. All requests, questions and comments should be sent to: James G. McGann, Ph.D. Senior Lecturer, International Studies Director, Think aT nks and Civil Societies Program The Lauder Institute University of Pennsylvania Email: [email protected] This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/think_tanks/16 For more information, please contact [email protected]. 2018 Global Go To Think aT nk Index Report Abstract The Thinka T nks and Civil Societies Program (TTCSP) of the Lauder Institute at the University of Pennsylvania conducts research on the role policy institutes play in governments and civil societies around the world. Often referred to as the “think tanks’ think tank,” TTCSP examines the evolving role and character of public policy research organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Global Go to Think Tank Index Report1
    University of Pennsylvania Masthead Logo ScholarlyCommons TTCSP Global Go To Think aT nk Index Reports Think aT nks and Civil Societies Program (TTCSP) 1-2019 2018 Global Go To Think aT nk Index Report James G. McGann University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/think_tanks Part of the International and Area Studies Commons McGann, James G., "2018 Global Go To Think aT nk Index Report" (2019). TTCSP Global Go To Think Tank Index Reports. 16. https://repository.upenn.edu/think_tanks/16 2019 Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this report may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by information storage or retrieval system, without written permission from the University of Pennsylvania, Think aT nks and Civil Societies Program. All requests, questions and comments should be sent to: James G. McGann, Ph.D. Senior Lecturer, International Studies Director, Think aT nks and Civil Societies Program The Lauder Institute University of Pennsylvania Email: [email protected] This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/think_tanks/16 For more information, please contact [email protected]. 2018 Global Go To Think aT nk Index Report Abstract The Thinka T nks and Civil Societies Program (TTCSP) of the Lauder Institute at the University of Pennsylvania conducts research on the role policy institutes play in governments and civil societies around the world. Often referred to as the “think tanks’ think tank,” TTCSP examines the evolving role and character of public policy research organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • (I) the SOCIAL STRUCTUBE of Soumn SOMALI TRIB by Virginia I?
    (i) THE SOCIAL STRUCTUBE OF SOumN SOMALI TRIB by Virginia I?lling A thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of London. October 197]. (ii) SDMMARY The subject is the social structure of a southern Somali community of about six thousand people, the Geledi, in the pre-colonial period; and. the manner in which it has reacted to colonial and other modern influences. Part A deals with the pre-colonial situation. Section 1 deals with the historical background up to the nineteenth century, first giving the general geographic and ethnographic setting, to show what elements went to the making of this community, and then giving the Geledj's own account of their history and movement up to that time. Section 2 deals with the structure of the society during the nineteenth century. Successive chapters deal with the basic units and categories into which this community divided both itself and the others with which it was in contact; with their material culture; with economic life; with slavery, which is shown to have been at the foundation of the social order; with the political and legal structure; and with the conduct of war. The chapter on the examines the politico-religious office of the Sheikh or Sultan as the focal point of the community, and how under successive occupants of this position, the Geledi became the dominant power in this part of Somalia. Part B deals with colonial and post-colonial influences. After an outline of the history of Somalia since 1889, with special reference to Geledi, the changes in society brought about by those events are (iii) described.
    [Show full text]
  • 3. State-Religion Relationship in Eritrea: Pre-Independence Era
    Table of Contents Abstract ..................................................................................................................................... 1 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 2 2. Historical overview of the relationship between state and religion ............................. 4 2.1. Christianity and the state: global overview ........................................................................................... 4 2.2. Islam and the state: global overview .................................................................................................... 7 2.3. Africa and the state-religion conundrum .............................................................................................. 9 3. State-religion relationship in Eritrea: pre-independence era ...................................... 9 3.1. Christianity and the state in Eritrea .................................................................................................... 10 3.2. Islam and the state in Eritrea .............................................................................................................. 14 4. State-religion relationship in Eritrea: post-independence era ................................... 16 5. Excessive state interference as a major cause of religious persecution ..................... 19 5.1. Jehovah’s Witnesses: the first victims of religious persecution ..........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ERITREA Religious Persecution
    [EMBARGOED FOR: 7 December 2005] Public amnesty international ERITREA Religious Persecution December 2005 AI Index: AFR 64/013/2005 INTERNATIONAL SECRETARIAT, 1 EASTON STREET, LONDON WC1X 0DW, UNITED KINGDOM [Embargoed for: 7 December 2005] Public amnesty international Eritrea Religious Persecution Summary AI Index: AFR 64/013/2005 Amnesty International has received disturbing reports of increasing violations in Eritrea of the right to freedom of religion, belief and conscience. While Jehovah’s Witnesses have been subjected to systematic and severe persecution for the past decade on account of their religious beliefs and refusal of compulsory military service, this report focuses on widespread detentions and other human rights violations of members of at least 36 evangelical Christian churches in the past three years, intensifying in 2005. The four main faiths – the Orthodox, Catholic and Lutheran churches and Islam – are officially recognized. In 2002, the government banned all minority religious groups and told them to register and provide details of their members and finances. None has been registered so far. In a crackdown since 2003 on the growing evangelical churches, church members have been arbitrarily detained during “home-worshipping” or at weddings. They have often been tortured or ill-treated in an attempt to force them to sign a document agreeing to stop worshipping. Many refused to sign, regarding it as a demand to deny and abandon their faith. Members of new groups of the Orthodox Church and Islam have also been detained on account of their beliefs. At least 26 pastors and priests are detained as prisoners of conscience. Other prisoners of conscience detained on account of their religious beliefs include 22 Jehovah’s Witnesses – three of them detained in Sawa army camp for over 11 years; some 1,750 evangelical church members, including children and 175 women; and dozens of Muslims.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Global Go to Think Tank Index Report
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program TTCSP Global Go To Think Tank Index Reports (TTCSP) 6-18-2020 2019 Global Go To Think Tank Index Report James G. McGann University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/think_tanks Part of the International and Area Studies Commons McGann, James G., "2019 Global Go To Think Tank Index Report" (2020). TTCSP Global Go To Think Tank Index Reports. 17. https://repository.upenn.edu/think_tanks/17 2020 Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this report may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by an information storage or retrieval system, without written permission from the University of Pennsylvania, Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program. All requests, questions and comments should be sent to: James G. McGann, Ph.D. Senior Lecturer, International Studies Director Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program The Lauder Institute University of Pennsylvania Email: [email protected] This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/think_tanks/17 For more information, please contact [email protected]. 2019 Global Go To Think Tank Index Report Abstract The Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program (TTCSP) of the Lauder Institute at the University of Pennsylvania conducts research on the role policy institutes play in governments and civil societies around the world. Often referred to as the “think tanks’ think tank,” TTCSP examines the evolving role and character of public policy research organizations. Over the last 29 years, the TTCSP has developed and led a series of global initiatives that have helped bridge the gap between knowledge and policy in critical policy areas such as international peace and security, globalization and governance, international economics, environmental issues, information and society, poverty alleviation, and healthcare and global health.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Daily Prayer Guide for All Africa People Groups & All LR-Upgs = Least-Reached
    2020 Daily Prayer Guide for all Africa People Groups & Least-Reached-Unreached People Groups (LR-UPGs) Source: Joshua Project data, www.joshuaproject.net To order prayer resources or for inquiries, contact email: [email protected] 2020 Daily Prayer Guide for all Africa People Groups & all LR-UPGs = Least-Reached--Unreached People Groups. All 48 Africa countries & 8 islands & People Groups & LR-UPG are included. LR-UPG defin: less than 2% Evangelical & less than 5% total Christian Frontier definition = FR = 0.1% Christian or less AFRICA SUMMARY: 3,702 total Africa People Groups; 957 total Africa Least-Reached--Unreached People Groups. Downloaded in October 2019 from www.joshuaproject.net * * * Color code: green = begin new area; blue = begin new country shaded = LR-UPG; white-not shaded = not LR-UPG * * * "Prayer is not the only thing we can can do, but it is the most important thing we can do!" * * * Let's dream God's dreams, and fulfill God's visions -- God dreams of all people groups knowing & loving Him! * * * Revelation 7:9, "After this I looked and there before me was a great multitude that no one could count, from every nation, tribe, people and language, standing before the throne and in front of the Lamb." standing before the throne and in front of the Lamb." Why Should We Pray For Unreached People Groups? * Missions & salvation of all people is God's plan, God's will, God's heart, God's dream, Gen. 3:9,15! * In the Great Commissions Jesus commanded us to reach all peoples in the world, Matt.
    [Show full text]
  • Amnesty International Report 2020/21
    AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL Amnesty International is a movement of 10 million people which mobilizes the humanity in everyone and campaigns for change so we can all enjoy our human rights. Our vision is of a world where those in power keep their promises, respect international law and are held to account. We are independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion and are funded mainly by our membership and individual donations. We believe that acting in solidarity and compassion with people everywhere can change our societies for the better. Amnesty International is impartial. We take no position on issues of sovereignty, territorial disputes or international political or legal arrangements that might be adopted to implement the right to self- determination. This report is organized according to the countries we monitored during the year. In general, they are independent states that are accountable for the human rights situation on their territory. First published in 2021 by Except where otherwise noted, This report documents Amnesty Amnesty International Ltd content in this document is International’s work and Peter Benenson House, licensed under a concerns through 2020. 1, Easton Street, CreativeCommons (attribution, The absence of an entry in this London WC1X 0DW non-commercial, no derivatives, report on a particular country or United Kingdom international 4.0) licence. territory does not imply that no https://creativecommons.org/ © Amnesty International 2021 human rights violations of licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode concern to Amnesty International Index: POL 10/3202/2021 For more information please visit have taken place there during ISBN: 978-0-86210-501-3 the permissions page on our the year.
    [Show full text]
  • 30 HERALD.Indd
    A publication of Ethiopia & Eritrea RPCVs — an affiliate of the National Peace Corps Association The HERALD \Summer 2005 — Number 30 The Ethiopian Election A bit of progress, a lot of uncertainty by Barry Hillenbrand (Debre Marcos 63–65) FIGURING OUT WHO WON — and who lost — the In the closing days of the campaign at least 250,000 May 15 election in Ethiopia has not been easy. What supporters of the opposition jammed Meskel Square Inside is sure is that the election took many twists and in Addis and heard speakers demanding the end of turns, some of them good, some of them bad — and 14 years in power of Prime Minister Meles Zenawi. Back to Debre Marcos 5 many unexpected. “What the people are saying today is, ‘We want Reviews 8 change,’” CUD president Hailu Shawel told the The pre-election period was filled with high crowd. “We are going to win, I guarantee it.” Not Ethiopia news 14 hopes. Campaigning by the government party, to be outdone, Meles’s EPRDF attracted a crowd — the Ethiopian People’s Revolutionary Democratic Eritrea news 19 some estimated it to be about 600,000 — to a rally Front (EPRDF), and the opposition groups includ- at the same venue. More speeches and predictions Books arrive 23 ing the Coalition for Unity and Democracy (CUD) of victory. The independent press, which blossomed and its ally, the United Ethiopian Democratic Forces during the election, covered it in detail. Friends 24 (UEDF), was spirited. “Never before in Ethiopian E&E RPCVs 25 history has there been such an open debate in the While enthusiasm for the election was not as in- country,” said Tim Clarke, chief of a delegation of tense in the countryside as it was in the main cities Contacts 26 election observers sent from the European Union.
    [Show full text]
  • Orthodox Church in Eritrea, in the Beginning of the 20Th Century
    REGNUM STUDIES IN GLOBAL CHRISTIANITY ORTHODOX HANDBOOK ON ECUMENISM Resources for Theological Education “That they all may be one” (John 17:21) Editors Pantelis Kalaitzidis Thomas FitzGerald Cyril Hovorun Aikaterini Pekridou Nikolaos Asproulis Guy Liagre Dietrich Werner REGNUM BOOKS INTERNATIONAL, OXFORD (in cooperation with WCC Publications), Oxford, 2014 (92) ECUMENICAL DIALOGUE IN THE ERITREAN ORTHODOX TEWAHEDO CHURCH Stanislau Paulau Introduction The Eritrean Orthodox Tewahedo Church is the youngest member of the Oriental Orthodox Church family, and it would not be an exaggeration to assert that it is also one of the least known Orthodox Churches worldwide. Although the Eritrean Orthodox Church was established only in the course of the last decade of the 20th century, it shares (together with the Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church) a heritage of a centuries-old tradition which goes back to the times of Late Antiquity. This young and simultaneously ancient Church is just making its fi rst steps within the institutionalized ecumenical movement, but the interaction with other Christian denominations has already played a constitutive role in its formation. Modern Eritrea is located along the south-western coast of the Red Sea, an area which once used to be the site of the ancient Kingdom of Aksum extending across the Red Sea into the Arabian Peninsula and beyond to the Gulf of Aden. Being a major player in the trade between the Roman Empire and Ancient India, China and Persia, the kingdom fl ourished from the 1st to the 7th century and attracted merchants and settlers from through- out the ancient world. It is therefore natural that the cosmopolite Kingdom of Aksum from the earliest times also had a number of Christians, but they were fi rst of all foreigners and lived predominantly in the port city of Adulis.
    [Show full text]
  • ECFG-Senegal-2020R.Pdf
    About this Guide This guide is designed to prepare you to deploy to culturally complex environments and achieve mission objectives. The fundamental information contained within will help you understand the cultural dimension of your assigned location and gain skills necessary for success (Photo a courtesy of the United Nations). The guide consists of 2 parts: Part 1 introduces “Culture General,” ECFG the foundational knowledge you need to operate effectively in any global environment. Part 2 presents “Culture Specific” Senegal, focusing on unique cultural Senegal features of Senegalese society and is designed to complement other pre- deployment training. It applies culture-general concepts to help increase your knowledge of your assigned deployment location. For further information, visit the Air Force Culture and Language Center (AFCLC) website at www.airuniversity.af.edu/AFCLC/ or contact AFCLC’s Region Team at [email protected]. Disclaimer: All text is the property of the AFCLC and may not be modified by a change in title, content, or labeling. It may be reproduced in its current format with the expressed permission of the AFCLC. All photography is provided as a courtesy of the US government, Wikimedia, and other sources as indicated. GENERAL CULTURE CULTURE PART 1 – CULTURE GENERAL What is Culture? Fundamental to all aspects of human existence, culture shapes the way humans view life and functions as a tool we use to adapt to our social and physical environments. A culture is the sum of all of the beliefs, values, behaviors, and symbols that have meaning for a society. All human beings have culture, and individuals within a culture share a general set of beliefs and values.
    [Show full text]
  • MENA-Atlas - Comments and Sources
    MENA-Atlas - Comments and Sources The “Atlas MENA” can be accessed via: http://www.ecoi.net/atlas_mena.pdf The comments and sources for the “Atlas MENA” can be accessed via: http://www.ecoi.net/atlas_mena_sources.pdf Table of contents 1/ General information (for all ethnic and religious maps) 2/ Near East 2.1/ Turkey 2.2/ Syria 2.3/ Iraq 2.4/ Jordan 2.5/ Lebanon 3/ Middle East 3.1/ Afghanistan 3.2/ Pakistan 3.3/ Iran 4/ Arabian Peninsula 4.1/ Saudi Arabia 4.2/ Yemen 4.3/ Oman 5/ North Africa 1 5.1/ Egypt 5.2/ Libya 6/ North Africa 2 6.1/ Algeria 6.2/ Morocco 6.3/ Tunisia 1 For the overview map the following source was used: 1 : 30 000 000: Natural Earth. For all the topographic and thematic maps 1 : 10 000 000: Collins World Explorer Premium, Natural Earth was used. The maps showing main oil and gas fields are all based on: Petroleum Economist, a division of Euromoney Global Limited, December 2014, designed by K. Fuller and P. Bush, map scale 1 : 23 000 000. 1. General information (for all ethnic and religious maps) The population of the MENA (Middle East and North Africa) region is very heterogeneously in terms of religious and sectarian, as well as ethnic and linguistic diversity. Due to this and because of the partly inconsistent sources the maps only indicate where main settlement areas of religious or ethnic groups are. Especially the religious and ethnic composition in urban centers may differ significantly from those in rural surroundings and it is not possible to show this heterogeneity on the maps.
    [Show full text]