5 ASSESSMENT 5.1 Assessment Approach and Methodology

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

5 ASSESSMENT 5.1 Assessment Approach and Methodology Offshore Energy SEA 2 5 ASSESSMENT 5.1 Assessment approach and methodology This SEA covers an enormous marine area comprising all UK waters with water depth from the intertidal to more than 2,400m. The draft plan/programme includes for the licensing of offshore oil and gas activities, the storage of gas and CO2, offshore wind farms and marine renewables. The assessment therefore has to address complex issues and multiple interrelationships, where a simplistic score based matrix assessment would be inadequate. Following discussion with the SEA Steering Group an evidence based consideration was agreed. In addition, significant use has been made of Geographical Information System (GIS) tools to collate, process, analyse and present spatial information. The assessment for this SEA is a staged process (Figure 5.1) incorporating inputs from a variety of sources: • Baseline understanding of the relevant receptors (including other users) grouped according to the SEA Directive (see Appendix 3 Environmental baseline and Section 4 Environmental information and the range of underpinning technical reports produced for the SEA process) together with existing environmental problems and the likely evolution of the baseline conditions. Given the comprehensive nature of the environmental baseline produced for OESEA, only updates to the baseline section since the publication of OESEA or baseline information relevant to the new aspects of the OESEA2 draft plan/programme are included in this report. • The likely activities, and potential sources of effect (see Box 5.1) and the existing mitigations, regulatory and other controls (see Appendix 5). • The evolving regulatory framework. • The evolution of technology. • The SEA objectives (see Section 3). • The evidence base regarding the relative risks and potential for significant effects from offshore wind farm, wave, tidal stream and tidal range developments, offshore oil and gas exploration and production, carbon dioxide storage and gas storage related activities. • Steering Group, statutory consultee and stakeholder perspectives on important issues, information sources and gaps, and potential areas to exclude from licensing derived from scoping, assessment workshop, regional stakeholder workshops, sector workshops, meetings and other communications – see Appendix 1 and 2. At a strategic level, a distinction has been drawn for various effect mechanisms between impacts which may be significant in terms of conservation status of a species or population (and hence are significant in strategic terms), and impacts which may be significant to individual animals, but which will not influence sufficient numbers to have a significant effect on population viability or conservation status (and hence strategically significant). February 2011 79 Environmental Report Offshore Energy SEA 2 Examples of this approach include the consideration of acoustic effects on marine mammals, collision risk for birds and oil spill effects. This approach does not imply that mortality or sub- lethal effects on individual animals are unimportant (clearly there are welfare considerations, particularly for avian and mammalian species); but it is appropriate that strategic considerations are made at a biogeographic population or species level – as is done for example, in the selection of qualifying features for Natura 2000 sites. Figure 5.1 – Assessment process Working list of SEA topics/issues Inputs to SEA Assessment Process: objectives & indicators (scoping) Inputs to SEA Assessment Process: - Issues of stakeholder & public concern - Draft plan/programme - Major reviews of effects - Oil & gas, carbon dioxide storage, gas - Scientific & "grey" literature storage, wave, tidal & offshore wind - The evolving Natura 2000 network Expert assessment workshop farm activities - Future MSP - MCZs/MPAs - Round 3 screening - Other marine industries and uses - Feedback from scoping - SEA studies & syntheses - Previous/other relevant SEAs & EIAs - Relevant guidelines & guidance - Hierarchy of environmental protection SEA topics/issues - Legislation objectives objectives & indicators - New information from surveys - Environmental baseline & likely evolution - Feedback from previous DECC SEA - Existing environmental problems consultations - Potential activity scenarios - Results from relevant monitoring Sector & regional stakeholder - Present & likely technologies workshops - Present & potential mitigation Potentially significant effects at a Possible minor effects at a No negative effects expected regional/transboundary level regional level Positive effects further assessed Evaluation to confirm Further assessment Inter-relationships spatial, synergistic, cumulative Conclusions & recommendations including monitoring Environmental Report 5.2 Potential sources of significant effects Potential sources of effects from the activities which could follow adoption of the draft plan/programme have been variously discussed with the SEA Steering Group and stakeholders (see Appendix 1 & 2) in terms of the likely significant effects on the environment, including on the SEA topics – these are listed in Box 5.1 below. A questionmark indicates uncertainty of potential for effect. The sources of potentially significant effect identified in Box 5.1 have been categorised by Assessment Topic (left hand column, see key at end of table) which forms the basis of the subsequent assessment sections. The potentially significant effects identified in Box 5.1 represent potential issues which merit further consideration (location of assessment signposted in right hand column, Assessment Section). Environmental Report 80 February 2011 Offshore Energy SEA 2 Box 5.1 Sources of potentially significant effect Storage Wave Wave Topic farms farms 2 Section Oil & Gas Tidal Range Tidal Range CO Gas Storage Gas Storage Assessment Assessment Assessment Tidal Stream Tidal Stream Offshore Wind Wind Offshore SEA Topic Biodiversity, habitats, flora and fauna 5.4.2.1 Physical damage to habitats from infrastructure construction, vessel/rig anchoring etc X X X X X X X 5.4.2.2 Potential behavioural and physiological effects on marine mammals, birds and fish from seismic 5.3.2.1 X X X surveys 5.3.2.2 Potential behavioural and physiological effects on marine mammals, birds and fish associated 5.3.2.1 X X X X X X X with piling and construction noise 5.3.2.2 Potential behavioural and physiological effects on marine mammals, birds and fish associated 5.3.2.1 X X X X X X X with operational noise 5.3.2.2 Potential behavioural and physiological effects on marine mammals, birds and fish associated 5.3.2.1 X X X X X X X with decommissioning noise 5.3.2.2 Potential for non-native species introductions in ballast water discharges or spread through 5.6.2.4 X X X X X X X “stepping stone” effect 5.9.2 Behavioural disturbance to fish, birds and marine mammals etc from physical presence of X X X X X X X 5.6.2 infrastructure and support activities 5.6.2.2 Collision risks to birds X X X 5.6.3 5.6.2.2 Collision risk to marine mammals, fish and large water column animals X X X 5.6.3 Barriers to movement of birds (e.g. foraging, migration) X X 5.6.2.1 Barriers to movement of fish and marine mammals X X X 5.6.2.1 Changes/loss of habitats from major alteration of hydrography or sedimentation ? X ? 5.4.2.2 Potential for effects on flora and fauna of produced water, saline discharges (aquifer water and X X X X X ? X 5.9.2 halite dissolution), and drilling discharges from wells and foundation construction EMF effects on sensitive species X X X X 5.6.2.5 February 2011 81 Environmental Report Offshore Energy SEA 2 Box 5.1 Sources of potentially significant effect Storage Wave Wave Topic farms farms 2 Section Oil & Gas Tidal Range Tidal Range CO Gas Storage Gas Storage Assessment Assessment Assessment Tidal Stream Tidal Stream Offshore Wind Wind Offshore The nature and use of antifouling materials ? X ? X 5.9.2 Accidental events - major oil or chemical spill X ?1 ?1 ?1 ?1 ? ?1 5.13.2.1 Accidental events - major release of CO2 X 5.13.2.1 SEA Topic Geology, substrates and coastal geomorphology Physical effects of anchoring and infrastructure construction (including pipelines and cables) on 5.4.2.1 X X X X X X X seabed sediments and geomorphological features (including scour) 5.4.2.2 Sediment modification and contamination by particulate discharges from drilling etc or re- X X X X X X X 5.9.2 suspension of contaminated sediment Effects of reinjection of produced water and/or cuttings and injection of CO2 X X X 5.9.2 Onshore disposal of returned drilling wastes – requirement for landfill X X X 5.10.2 5.4.2.1 Post-decommissioning (legacy) effects – cuttings piles, footings, foundations etc X X X X X X X 5.4.2.2 5.4.2.2 Changes to sedimentation regime and associated physical effects X X X 5.5.2 1 1 1 1 1 1 5.13.2.2 Accidental events - risk of sediment contamination from oil or chemical spills X ? ? ? ? ? ? 5.13.2.3 5.13.2.2 Accidental events – blow out impacts on seabed X X X 5.13.2.3 SEA Topic Landscape/seascape 5.8.2.4 Potential visual impacts and seascape effects of development including change to character X X X X X X X 5.8.3 SEA Topic Water environment Contamination by soluble and dispersed discharges including produced water, saline discharges (aquifer water and halite dissolution), and drilling discharges from wells and foundation X X X X X ? X 5.9.2 construction Environmental Report 82 February 2011 Offshore Energy SEA 2 Box 5.1 Sources of potentially significant effect Storage Wave Wave Topic farms farms 2 Section
Recommended publications
  • Modeling and Dynamic Analysis of Offshore Wind Farms in France: Impact on Power System Stability
    04/11/2011 Modeling and dynamic analysis of offshore wind farms in France: Impact on power system stability KTH Master Thesis report number Alexandre Henry Examiner at KTH Dr. Luigi Vanfretti Supervisors at KTH Dr. Luigi Vanfretti and Camille Hamon Supervisor at EDF Dr. Bayram Tounsi Laboratory Electric Power Systems School of Electrical Engineering KTH, Royal Institute of Technology Stockholm, November 2011 Accessibility : .. Front page Page I / III ... Modeling and dynamic analysis of offshore wind farms in France: Impact on KTH EPS power system stability - EDF R&D Abstract Alexandre Henry Page 1 / 90 KTH Master Thesis Modeling and dynamic analysis of offshore wind farms in France: Impact on KTH EPS power system stability - EDF R&D Nomenclature EWEA : European Wind Energy Association UK : United Kingdom EU : European union AC : Alternating current DC : Direct current HVAC : High Voltage Alternating Current HVDC : High Voltage Direct Current PCC : Point of Common Coupling TSO : Transmission System Operator RTE : Réseau de transport d’électricité (French TSO) XLPE : cross linked polythylene insulated VSC : Voltage source converter LCC : Line commutated converter FACTS : Flexible AC Transmission System SVC : Static Var Compensator DFIG : Double Fed Induction Generator MVAC : Medium Voltage Alternating Current ENTSO-E : European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity HFF : High Frequency Filter FRT : Fault Ride Through Alexandre Henry Page 2 / 90 KTH Master Thesis Modeling and dynamic analysis of offshore wind farms
    [Show full text]
  • Housing Land Supply Position Statement 2020/21 to 2024/25
    www.eastriding.gov.uk www.eastriding.gov.uk ff YouYouTubeTube East Riding Local Plan 2012 - 2029 Housing Land Supply Position Statement For the period 2020/21 to 2024/25 December 2020 Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 1 Background ........................................................................................................................ 1 National Policy .................................................................................................................. 1 Performance ...................................................................................................................... 3 Residual housing requirement ......................................................................................... 5 2 Methodology ........................................................................................................... 7 Developing the Methodology ........................................................................................... 7 Covid-19 ............................................................................................................................. 8 Calculating the Potential Capacity of Sites .................................................................... 9 Pre-build lead-in times ................................................................................................... 10 Build rates for large sites ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • TOP 100 POWER PEOPLE 2016 the Movers and Shakers in Wind
    2016 Top 100 Power People 1 TOP 100 POWER PEOPLE 2016 The movers and shakers in wind Featuring interviews with Samuel Leupold from Dong Energy and Ian Mays from RES Group © A Word About Wind, 2016 2016 Top 100 Power People Contents 2 CONTENTS Compiling the Top 100: Advisory panel and ranking process 4 Interview: Dong Energy’s Samuel Leupold discusses offshore 6 Top 100 breakdown: Statistics on this year’s table 11 Profiles: Numbers 100 to 41 13 Interview: A Word About Wind meets RES Group’s Ian Mays 21 Profiles: Numbers 40 to 6 26 Top five profiles:The most influential people in global wind 30 Top 100 list: The full Top 100 Power People for 2016 32 Next year: Key dates for your diary in 2017 34 21 Facing the future: Ian Mays on RES Group’s plans after his retirement © A Word About Wind, 2016 2016 Top 100 Power People Editorial 3 EDITORIAL resident Donald Trump. It is one of The company’s success in driving down the Pthe biggest shocks in US presidential costs of offshore wind over the last year history but, in 2017, Trump is set to be the owes a great debt to Leupold’s background new incumbent in the White House. working for ABB and other big firms. Turn to page 6 now if you want to read the The prospect of operating under a climate- whole interview. change-denying serial wind farm objector will not fill the US wind sector with much And second, we went to meet Ian Mays joy.
    [Show full text]
  • Offshore Wind Submarine Cabling Overview Fisheries Technical Working Group
    OFFSHOREoverview WIND SUBMARINE CABLING Fisheries Technical Working Group Final Report | Report Number 21-14 | April 2021 NYSERDA’s Promise to New Yorkers: NYSERDA provides resources, expertise, and objective information so New Yorkers can make confident, informed energy decisions. Our Vision: New York is a global climate leader building a healthier future with thriving communities; homes and businesses powered by clean energy; and economic opportunities accessible to all New Yorkers. Our Mission: Advance clean energy innovation and investments to combat climate change, improving the health, resiliency, and prosperity of New Yorkers and delivering benefits equitably to all. Courtesy, Equinor, Dudgeon Offshore Wind Farm Offshore Wind Submarine Cabling Overview Fisheries Technical Working Group Final Report Prepared for: New York State Energy Research and Development Authority Albany, NY Morgan Brunbauer Offshore Wind Marine Fisheries Manager Prepared by: Tetra Tech, Inc. Boston, MA Brian Dresser Director of Fisheries Programs NYSERDA Report 21-14 NYSERDA Contract 111608A April 2021 Notice This report was prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. in the course of performing work contracted for and sponsored by the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (hereafter “NYSERDA”). The opinions expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect those of NYSERDA or the State of New York, and reference to any specific product, service, process, or method does not constitute an implied or expressed recommendation or endorsement of it. Further, NYSERDA, the State of New York, and the contractor make no warranties or representations, expressed or implied, as to the fitness for particular purpose or merchantability of any product, apparatus, or service, or the usefulness, completeness, or accuracy of any processes, methods, or other information contained, described, disclosed, or referred to in this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Tonnes Per Year CO2 Saving†
    Wind power is an integral part of the UK Government’s climate change initiative; with the recognition that offshore wind power in particular has the potential to generate a significant amount of the energy needed by the UK itself in coming years. The London Array project forms part of a 7 gigawatt series of projects in the UK, which when complete will provide the energy equivalent to the needs of 7% of the UK¥. Supplying coatings to the London Array is the latest step in AkzoNobel’s experience in the offshore wind power market. Previous work includes supplying high performance coatings to some of the world’s most exciting offshore wind developments including wind farms Alpha Ventus, Greater Gabbard, Beatrice and also Ormonde, a 150MW installation in the Irish Sea. ¥ Source: bwea.co.uk/offshore/info * 470,000 homes powered by the output annually for phase 1 of the project * Based on an average annual household energy consumption of 4,478kWh and site specific data indicating a load factor of at least 39%. † Carbon calculators are based on 430g CO2/kWh and site specific data indicating a load factor of at least 39%. The facts on the size of the project speak for themselves… onshore 1 substation offshore substations 2 km² offshore With a capacity of up to 1000 megawatts (MW), the London Array Offshore 100 area Wind Farm in the outer Thames Estuary is expected to become the world’s wind turbines largest offshore wind farm when the construction of phase one of the project 175 km of offshore cabling is completed towards the end of 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 6.1: List of Cumulative Projects
    Appendix 6.1 Long list of cumulative projects considered within the EIA Report GoBe Consultants Ltd. March 2018 List of Cumulative Appendix 6.1 Projects 1 Firth of Forth and Tay Offshore Wind Farms Inch Cape Offshore Wind (as described in the decision notices of Scottish Ministers dated 10th October 2014 and plans referred to therein and as proposed in the Scoping Report submitted to MS-LOT in May 2017) The consented project will consist of up to 110 wind turbines and generating up to 784 MW situated East of the Angus Coast in the outer Forth and Tay. It is being developed by Inch Cape Offshore Windfarm Ltd (ICOL). This project was consented in 2014, but was subject to Judicial Review proceedings (see section 1.4.1.1 of the EIA Report for full details) which resulted in significant delays. Subsequently ICOL requested a Scoping Opinion for a new application comprising of 75 turbines with a generating capacity of 784 MW. Project details can be accessed at: http://www.inchcapewind.com/home Seagreen Alpha and Bravo (as described in the decision notices of Scottish Ministers dated 10th October 2014 and plans referred to therein and as Proposed in the Scoping Report submitted to MS-LOT in May 2017) The consents for this project includes two offshore wind farms, being developed by Seagreen Wind Energy Limited (SWEL), each consisting of up to 75 wind turbines and generating up to 525 MW. This project was consented in 2014, but was subject to Judicial Review proceedings (see section 1.4.1.1 of the EIA Report for full details) which resulted in significant delays.
    [Show full text]
  • London Array Offshore Wind Farm Ørsted
    London Array Offshore Wind Farm Ørsted Welcome to London Array London Array is the second largest operational wind farm in the world. The project comprises 175 turbines with a combined total capacity of 630 MW. Ørsted is the largest offshore wind developer in both the world and the UK. Since 2004 we have been developing, constructing and operating offshore wind farms in the UK – our biggest market. Our 11 operational offshore wind farms are powering over 3.2 million homes and with another two in construction this number will rise to 5.5 million homes by 2022. In addition to our offshore wind farms, we construct battery-storage projects, ° Barrow Walney Extension ° ° Westermost Rough innovative waste and recycling Walney 1&2 ° ° Burbo Bank Extension ° Hornsea 1&2 West of Duddon Sands ° ° Burbo Bank technology and provide smart energy ° Lincs ° Race Bank products to our commercial and industrial customers. We currently employ 1,000 people in the UK and have ° Gunfleet Sands 1, 2 & 3 already invested over £9.5 billion. We will ° London ArrayArray 1 invest at least a further £3.5 billion by 2021. We are committed for the long-term, both to leading the change to green Wind power under construction energy, and to investing in the communities where we operate. Wind power in operation Welcome to London Array Where is London Array? London Array is situated 20 km (12.4 miles) off the east coast of Britain in the outer Thames Estuary. N Felixstowe W E Essex S Clacton London Array Southend Thames Estuary ° Barrow Walney Extension ° ° Westermost Rough
    [Show full text]
  • Building Offshore Wind in England CORE: Centres for Offshore Renewable Engineering
    Building Offshore Wind in England CORE: Centres for Offshore Renewable Engineering BUSINESS IS 2 Building Offshore Wind in England Ministerial Foreword Offshore wind is a UK success story and the UK is open for business. The UK is the world leader in offshore wind. We have more offshore wind installed than anywhere else in the world. We are an island nation, blessed with strong winds and shallow seas – and this energy resource is on our doorstep. We are determined to move to cleaner electricity generation and offshore wind has an important role to play in our long term plan for a balanced, low carbon energy mix. I want the UK to secure the economic benefits of this new industry. Through our offshore wind industrial strategy, the Government is committed to working in partnership with business to build a competitive, innovative UK supply chain for offshore wind, delivering jobs and economic growth. Building a strong supply chain needs the commitment and expertise of local partners, working alongside central government to support businesses who want to invest here. The Centres for Offshore Renewable Engineering (CORE) partnership offers an integrated and cooperative approach between Government and Local Enterprise Partnerships in England, to provide the best possible support to businesses choosing England as an investment location. The Rt Hon Matthew Hancock MP Minister of State for Business, Enterprise and Energy CORE brings together the relevant expertise from UK Central Government and the six major investment hubs in England to support business growth and showcase opportunities for foreign direct investment (FDI) for the offshore wind sector.
    [Show full text]
  • A Vision for Scotland's Electricity and Gas Networks
    A vision for Scotland’s electricity and gas networks DETAIL 2019 - 2030 A vision for scotland’s electricity and gas networks 2 CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: SUPPORTING OUR ENERGY SYSTEM 03 The policy context 04 Supporting wider Scottish Government policies 07 The gas and electricity networks today 09 CHAPTER 2: DEVELOPING THE NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURE 13 Electricity 17 Gas 24 CHAPTER 3: COORDINATING THE TRANSITION 32 Regulation and governance 34 Whole system planning 36 Network funding 38 CHAPTER 4: SCOTLAND LEADING THE WAY – INNOVATION AND SKILLS 39 A vision for scotland’s electricity and gas networks 3 CHAPTER 1: SUPPORTING OUR ENERGY SYSTEM A vision for scotland’s electricity and gas networks 4 SUPPORTING OUR ENERGY SYSTEM Our Vision: By 2030… Scotland’s energy system will have changed dramatically in order to deliver Scotland’s Energy Strategy targets for renewable energy and energy productivity. We will be close to delivering the targets we have set for 2032 for energy efficiency, low carbon heat and transport. Our electricity and gas networks will be fundamental to this progress across Scotland and there will be new ways of designing, operating and regulating them to ensure that they are used efficiently. The policy context The energy transition must also be inclusive – all parts of society should be able to benefit. The Scotland’s Energy Strategy sets out a vision options we identify must make sense no matter for the energy system in Scotland until 2050 – what pathways to decarbonisation might targeting a sustainable and low carbon energy emerge as the best. Improving the efficiency of system that works for all consumers.
    [Show full text]
  • Industrial Impact the Power of Scotland's Renewables Sector
    Supported by Industrial impact the power of Scotland’s renewables sector Wind Service at E.ON INTRODUCTION Climate and Renewables Despite daily headlines on energy, climate change and the growth of renewables, few people appreciate the scale of the transformation which is steadily underway in our energy sector. In just eight years Scotland has almost tripled its Glasgow and Edinburgh are home to large power utilities renewable energy capacity, and made a massive dent in as well as some of our most cutting-edge science, the country’s carbon emissions as a result. research and innovation organisations – companies like Limpet Technologies and Neo Environmental are The industrial benefits of this strategic transformation developing unique products which are already being are as impressive as the environmental ones: exported across the globe. renewable energy is driving innovation and clean growth across Scotland. Research by Scottish Renewables in December 2016 showed Scottish renewable energy businesses like these The sector currently employs 21,000 people, from have been involved in projects worth £125.3 million in 43 entrepreneurs who’re designing new ways to capture countries in every continent bar Antarctica. energy from nature, consultants who make projects viable, E.ON in Scotland lawyers who negotiate contracts, a supply chain which In the south of Scotland, organisations like Natural Power builds wind farms, hydro plant and solar farms and an and Green Cat Group are nurturing workforces skilled army of highly-skilled engineers and technicians who in providing the development support that renewable E.ON, through its renewables arm E.ON Climate and multiple turbine manufacturers/types across Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Future Potential for Offshore Wind in Wales Prepared for the Welsh Government
    Future Potential for Offshore Wind in Wales Prepared for the Welsh Government December 2018 Acknowledgments The Carbon Trust wrote this report based on an impartial analysis of primary and secondary sources, including expert interviews. The Carbon Trust would like to thank everyone that has contributed their time and expertise during the preparation and completion of this report. Special thanks goes to: Black & Veatch Crown Estate Scotland Hartley Anderson Innogy Renewables MHI-Vestas Offshore Wind Milford Haven Port Authority National Grid Natural Resources Wales Ørsted Wind Power Port of Mostyn Prysmian PowerLink The Crown Estate Welsh Government Cover page image credits: Innogy Renewables (Gwynt-y-Môr Offshore Wind Farm). | 1 The Carbon Trust is an independent, expert partner that works with public and private section organizations around the world, helping them to accelerate the move to a sustainable, low carbon economy. We advise corporates and governments on carbon emissions reduction, improving resource efficiency, and technology innovation. We have world-leading experience in the development of low carbon energy markets, including offshore wind. The Carbon Trust has been at the forefront of the offshore wind industry globally for the past decade, working closely with governments, developers, suppliers, and innovators to reduce the cost of offshore wind energy through informing policy, supporting business decision-making, and commercialising innovative technology. Authors: Rhodri James Manager [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • Working at Heights
    COMMUNICATION HUB FOR THE WIND ENERGY INDUSTRY SPECIALIST SURVEYING WORKING AT HEIGHTS LAW SPOTLIGHT ON TYNE & TEES APRIL/MAY 2013 | £5.25 INTRODUCTION ‘SPOTLIGHT’ ON THE TYNE & THE TEES CONTINUING OUR SUCCESSFUL REGULAR FEATURES company/organisation micropage held ‘Spotlight On’ featureS WE We can boast no fewer than 9 separate within our website, so that you can learn AGAIN VISIT THE TYNE & TEES features within this edition. Some much more in all sorts of formats. AS ‘an area of excellence are planned and can be found in our IN THE WIND ENERGY INDUSTRY ‘Forthcoming Features’ tab on our These have already become very popular THROUGHOUT EUROPE AND website – we do however react to editorial as it links the printed magazine in a very beyond’ received, which we believe is important interactive way – a great marketing tool to the industry and create new features to for our decision making readership to The area is becoming more and more suit. find out about products and services important to the wind energy industry. immediately following the reading of an As you will see the depth and breadth Therefore please do not hesitate to let us interesting article. Contact the commercial of the companies and organisations know about any subject area which you department to find out how to get one for who have contributed to this feature do feel is important to the continued progress your company. not disappoint. of the industry and we will endeavour to bring it to the fore. The feature boasts the largest page Click to view more info count so far which stretches over 40 WIND ENERGY INDUSTRY SKILLS GAP pages! – initiative update = Click to view video I year ago we reported that there were 4 COLLABORATION AND THE VESSEL main areas to focus on if we are to satisfy CO-OPERATIVE that need and would include a focused Our industry lead article in this edition approach in the following areas.
    [Show full text]