DOCSLIB.ORG

Modeling and Dynamic Analysis of Offshore Wind Farms in France: Impact on Power System Stability

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Modeling and Dynamic Analysis of Offshore Wind Farms in France: Impact on Power System Stability 04/11/2011 Modeling and dynamic analysis of offshore wind farms in France: Impact on power system stability KTH Master Thesis report number Alexandre Henry Examiner at KTH Dr. Luigi Vanfretti Supervisors at KTH Dr. Luigi Vanfretti and Camille Hamon Supervisor at EDF Dr. Bayram Tounsi Laboratory Electric Power Systems School of Electrical Engineering KTH, Royal Institute of Technology Stockholm, November 2011 Accessibility : .. Front page Page I / III ... Modeling and dynamic analysis of offshore wind farms in France: Impact on KTH EPS power system stability - EDF R&D Abstract Alexandre Henry Page 1 / 90 KTH Master Thesis Modeling and dynamic analysis of offshore wind farms in France: Impact on KTH EPS power system stability - EDF R&D Nomenclature EWEA : European Wind Energy Association UK : United Kingdom EU : European union AC : Alternating current DC : Direct current HVAC : High Voltage Alternating Current HVDC : High Voltage Direct Current PCC : Point of Common Coupling TSO : Transmission System Operator RTE : Réseau de transport d’électricité (French TSO) XLPE : cross linked polythylene insulated VSC : Voltage source converter LCC : Line commutated converter FACTS : Flexible AC Transmission System SVC : Static Var Compensator DFIG : Double Fed Induction Generator MVAC : Medium Voltage Alternating Current ENTSO-E : European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity HFF : High Frequency Filter FRT : Fault Ride Through Alexandre Henry Page 2 / 90 KTH Master Thesis Modeling and dynamic analysis of offshore wind farms in France: Impact on KTH EPS power system stability - EDF R&D Table of contents ABSTRACT .............................................................................................................................................. 1 NOMENCLATURE ................................................................................................................................... 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................... 3 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 5 1.1. BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................................. 5 1.1.1. The current situation in Europe .............................................................................................. 5 1.1.2. The French situation ............................................................................................................... 7 1.2. THE GOALS OF THIS MASTER’S THESIS ............................................................................................11 1.3. THE MASTER’S THESIS CONTENT ....................................................................................................11 2. PRESENTATION OF EDF ..............................................................................................................12 2.1. EDF COMPANY ..............................................................................................................................12 2.1.1. Electricity production and consumption in France ................................................................12 2.1.2. The opening to competition in the electricity market ............................................................12 2.1.3. The EDF company today ......................................................................................................12 2.1.4. Some key data......................................................................................................................13 2.1.5. The main assets ...................................................................................................................13 2.2. EDF R&D .....................................................................................................................................13 2.3. THE RESEARCH TEAM EFESE-R12 ................................................................................................14 3. TECHNOLOGY CHOICES OF THE REFERENCE OFFSHORE WIND FARM .............................15 3.1. OFFSHORE WIND FARM TECHNOLOGIES ...........................................................................................15 3.1.1. Electrical layout of offshore wind farms : ..............................................................................16 3.1.2. Wind turbine generators: ......................................................................................................16 3.1.3. Internal cables : ....................................................................................................................18 3.1.4. Offshore substations : ..........................................................................................................18 3.1.5. Wind farm connections : Transmission cables .....................................................................19 3.2. ANALYSIS OF 6 OFFSHORE WIND FARMS ..........................................................................................19 3.3. CONCLUSION ABOUT THE STUDIED OFFSHORE WIND FARMS ..............................................................25 3.4. CHOSEN SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE REFERENCE OFFSHORE WIND FARM ............................................28 4. TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR OFFSHORE WIND FARM CONNECTIONS : SPECIFIC OFFSHORE GRID CODE ......................................................................................................................29 4.1. REQUIREMENTS ABOUT THE VOLTAGE MANAGEMENT ........................................................................31 4.1.1. Steady state conditions ........................................................................................................31 4.1.2. Reactive power/ Voltage regulation .....................................................................................32 4.1.3. Fault ride through (with grid support) ...................................................................................33 4.2. REQUIREMENTS ABOUT THE FREQUENCY MANAGEMENT ...................................................................34 4.3. SYNTHESIS ABOUT OFFSHORE GRID CODES .....................................................................................35 5. BEHAVIOR OF OFFSHORE WIND FARMS DURING A FAULT : FARM + HVDC ......................37 5.1. INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................................37 5.1.1. HVAC transmission systems ................................................................................................37 5.1.2. HVDC transmission systems ................................................................................................37 5.2. PRESENTATION OF VSC-HVDC TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS ................................................................37 5.3. VSC-HVDC LINE AND FARM BEHAVIORS DURING A FAULT ................................................................39 5.3.1. Description of the problem ...................................................................................................39 5.3.2. Possible solutions .................................................................................................................40 5.3.3. Examples of different case studies from the literature .........................................................41 5.4. CONCLUSION .................................................................................................................................43 Alexandre Henry Page 3 / 90 KTH Master Thesis Modeling and dynamic analysis of offshore wind farms in France: Impact on KTH EPS power system stability - EDF R&D 6. CASE STUDY 1 : AC CONNECTION OF THE 200 MW AC REFERENCE OFFSHORE WIND FARM .....................................................................................................................................................45 6.1. MODEL OF THE WIND FARM WITH AN AC TRANSMISSION CABLE .........................................................45 6.1.1. Model of the wind turbine GE – 3 MW .................................................................................46 6.1.2. The submarine cables 33 kV and 225 kV ............................................................................47 6.1.3. The transformers ..................................................................................................................48 6.2. DYNAMIC BEHAVIOR OF THE AC/AC REFERENCE OFFSHORE WIND FARM : SIMULATIONS ....................48 6.2.1. Impact of the aggregation on the dynamic behavior of the offshore wind farm ...................49 6.2.2. Static impact of an AC 225 kV transmission line ..................................................................51 6.2.3. Dynamic behavior of the reference offshore wind farm with the AC transmission line : Compliance with the ENTSOE and RTE grid code requirements ......................................................53 6.3. CONCLUSION : CASE STUDY N°1 : AC CONNECTION OF AN OFFSHORE WIND FARM .............................68 7. CASE STUDY 2: CONNECTION OF THE AC/AC 200 MW WIND FARM ON AN ELECTRICAL NETWORK .............................................................................................................................................70 7.1. MODEL OF THE ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEM ...................................................................................70 7.1.1. Model of synchronous
Load more

Recommended publications
  • High-Resolution CFD Modelling of Lillgrund Wind Farm
    International Conference on Renewable Energies and Power Quality (ICREPQ’13) Bilbao (Spain), 20th to 22th March, 2013 Renewable Energy and Power Quality Journal (RE&PQJ) ISSN 2172-038 X, No.11, March 2013 High-resolution CFD modelling of Lillgrund Wind farm A.C.W. Creech1, W.-G. Früh2 and A.E. Maguire3 1 Institute of Energy Systems, School of Engineering, University of Edinburgh Kings Buildings, Edinburgh EH9 3JL (UK) E-mail: [email protected] 2 Institute of Mechanical, Process and Energy Engineering, School of Physical Sciences and Engineering, Heriot-Watt University, Riccarton, Edinburgh EH14 4AS (UK) E-mail: [email protected] 3 Vattenfall United Kingdom, Research & Development New Renewables The Tun, Holyrood Road, Edinburgh EH8 8AE (UK) E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. We report on a fully dynamic simulation of key factor affecting the performance is that turbines in Vattenfall’s Lillgrund offshore Wind Farm, with a focus the array may be in the wakes of upstream turbines where on the wake effects of turbines on the performance of they experience substantially lower wind speeds than the individual turbines, and of the farm as a whole. upstream turbines [1]. Common approaches are Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) CFD or simpler flow modelling coupled with linear wake theory, The model uses a dynamic representation of a wind turbine such as Jensen’s Park model. However, it is recognised to simulate interaction between the wind and the turbine that the simple wake models lose accuracy when applied rotors, calculating the instantaneous power output and to multiple wakes interacting.
    [Show full text]
  • Offshore Wind Submarine Cabling Overview Fisheries Technical Working Group
    OFFSHOREoverview WIND SUBMARINE CABLING Fisheries Technical Working Group Final Report | Report Number 21-14 | April 2021 NYSERDA’s Promise to New Yorkers: NYSERDA provides resources, expertise, and objective information so New Yorkers can make confident, informed energy decisions. Our Vision: New York is a global climate leader building a healthier future with thriving communities; homes and businesses powered by clean energy; and economic opportunities accessible to all New Yorkers. Our Mission: Advance clean energy innovation and investments to combat climate change, improving the health, resiliency, and prosperity of New Yorkers and delivering benefits equitably to all. Courtesy, Equinor, Dudgeon Offshore Wind Farm Offshore Wind Submarine Cabling Overview Fisheries Technical Working Group Final Report Prepared for: New York State Energy Research and Development Authority Albany, NY Morgan Brunbauer Offshore Wind Marine Fisheries Manager Prepared by: Tetra Tech, Inc. Boston, MA Brian Dresser Director of Fisheries Programs NYSERDA Report 21-14 NYSERDA Contract 111608A April 2021 Notice This report was prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. in the course of performing work contracted for and sponsored by the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (hereafter “NYSERDA”). The opinions expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect those of NYSERDA or the State of New York, and reference to any specific product, service, process, or method does not constitute an implied or expressed recommendation or endorsement of it. Further, NYSERDA, the State of New York, and the contractor make no warranties or representations, expressed or implied, as to the fitness for particular purpose or merchantability of any product, apparatus, or service, or the usefulness, completeness, or accuracy of any processes, methods, or other information contained, described, disclosed, or referred to in this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Lillgrund Wind Power Offshore
    LILLGRUND WIND POWER OFFSHORE 110 MW UNDER CONSTRUCTION IN SOUTHERN SWEDEN. Jeju, Korea, April 20, 2007 Kenneth Averstad, Vattenfall AB Wind Power, Sweden © Vattenfall AB 1 Agenda • Short presentation of my company Vattenfall AB and our wind power development activities. • Lillgrund Wind Power Offshore Project 110 MW. • Other Offshore Wind Projects under Development in Sweden. © Vattenfall AB Vattenfall AB's Electricity Generation About 160 TWh / year Finland 0,5 TWh Sweden 80 TWh 7 TWh Denmark 68 TWh 2,3 TWh Germany Poland © Vattenfall AB Vattenfall Nordic Wind Power 2007: 487 MW ; 1200 GWh/yr Denmark 406 WT, 309 MW, Sweden 62 WT, 750 GWh 54 MW, 120 GWh Finland 10 WT, 4 MW, 8 GWh England 30 WT, Poland 15 WT, 90 MW, 270 GWh 30 MW, 60 GWh Own and operate total: 523 wind turbines = Offices © Vattenfall AB Vattenfall’s Offshore Wind Power in Operation 2007 Horns Rev (60%), 360 GWh Utgrunden 1 + + Yttre Stengrund, Kentish Flats, 60 GWh 270 GWh Map from Vattenfall’s Corporate Social Responsibility Report (www.vattenfall.com) © Vattenfall AB Näsudden = Vattenfall’s O&M and Test Centre - since 1982 and prototype testing, for example: Nordic Windpower 2, 1000 kW Nordic Windpower 1, 1000 kW Näsudden 2, 3000 kW Located on the island Gotland in the Baltic Sea. © Vattenfall AB Näsudden 2, 3000 kW Gotland, Sweden 61.4 GWh WORLD RECORD Finally stopped January 9, 2007 at 02:29, after 61,469 generating hours since start March 14, 1993. Vibration alarms, low oil pressure in gear- box. Inspection showed severe damages in gearbox, many teeth in different gear- box steps have been damaged.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Annual Load Factors for 2018/19 Tnuos Tariffs
    Final Annual Load Factors for 2018/19 TNUoS Tariffs October 2017 NGET: Final ALFs for 2018/19 TNUoS Tariffs October 2017 1 Final Annual Load Factors for 2018/19 TNUoS Tariffs This information paper contains the Final Annual Load Factors (ALFs) that National Grid will use in the calculation of Generation TNUoS charges from April 2018. October 2017 October 2017 Contents Executive Summary 4 Annual Load Factors For The 2018/19 Charging Year 5 Table 1: Annual Load Factors By Generating Station 5 Table 2: Generic Annual Load Factors For The 2018/19 Charging Year 10 Changes to the Draft ALFs 11 The Onshore Wind Generic ALF has changed 11 Edinbane 11 Pen Y Cymoedd 11 Inactive Generators 12 How Are ALFs Calculated? 13 Five Years Of Data 13 Four Years Of Data 14 Three Years Of Data 14 Fewer Than Three Years Of Data 14 Calculation Of Partial Year ALFs 15 Generic ALFs 15 Next Steps 15 Appendix A: Generation Charging Principles 16 CMP268 16 The TNUoS Wider Tariff 16 Other Charges 17 Contact Us If you have any comments or questions on the contents or format of this report, please don’t hesitate to get in touch with us. Team Email & Phone [email protected] 01926 654633 NGET: Final ALFs for 2018/19 TNUoS Tariffs October 2017 3 Executive Summary This document contains the Final Annual Load Factors (ALFs) to be used in the calculation of generator Transmission Network Use of System (TNUoS) tariffs for 2018/19, effective from 1 April 2018. The ALFs are based on generation data for five years from 2012/13 until 2016/17.
    [Show full text]
  • Vattenfall Wind Power Ltd Thanet
    Vattenfall Wind Power Ltd Thanet Extension Offshore Wind Farm Appendix 31 to Deadline 1 Submission: Written Summary of Oral Case put at the Issue Specific Hearing 2 – Shipping & Navigation Relevant Examination Deadline: 1 Submitted by Vattenfall Wind Power Ltd Date: January 2019 Revision A Written Summary of Oral Case put at the Issue Thanet Extension Offshore Wind Farm Specific Hearing 2 Drafted By: Vattenfall Wind Power Ltd Approved By: Daniel Bates Date of Approval: January 2019 Revision: A Revision 0 Circulated to agreed attendees Revision A First draft submitted to the Examining Authority N/A N/A Copyright © 2019 Vattenfall Wind Power Ltd All pre-existing rights retained Page 2 / 40 Written Summary of Oral Case put at the Issue Thanet Extension Offshore Wind Farm Specific Hearing 2 Contents 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 4 Participants .................................................................................................................. 4 Agenda......................................................................................................................... 4 2 Issue Specific Hearing 1 – Agenda Item 7. Shipping, Navigation and Marine Safety Relating to French Waters ......................................................................................................... 5 3 Issue Specific Hearing 1 - Agenda Item 8. Shipping, Navigation and Marine Safety Relating to the Waters of other Countries ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Offshore Wind Power Plant Technology Catalogue Components of Wind Power Plants, AC Collection Systems and HVDC Systems
    Offshore Wind Power Plant Technology Catalogue Components of wind power plants, AC collection systems and HVDC systems Kaushik Das, Nicolaos Antonios Cutululis Department of Wind Energy Technical University of Denmark Denmark October, 2017 ǡ ǡ ǣ ǡ ǡ ǡ Ǥ ǣ ሾሿ ǣ ǣ ǯȀǯ Ȁ Ǥ Ǥ Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Motivation . .3 1.2 Outline of the Report . .3 2 Wind Turbines 4 2.1 Description . .4 2.1.1 Doubly-fed Induction Generator (DFIG) based Wind Turbine4 2.1.2 Fully Rated Converter (FRC) based Wind Turbine . .4 2.2 Technical feasibilities . .5 2.3 Stages of Development . .5 2.4 Cost and Lifetime . .5 3 AC Cables 7 3.1 Cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE) cables . .7 3.1.1 Technical feasibilities . .8 3.1.2 Stages of Development . .9 3.1.3 Cost and Lifetime . .9 3.2 High Temperature Superconducting (HTS) cables . .9 3.2.1 Technical feasibilities . 10 3.2.2 Stages of Development . 10 3.2.3 Cost . 10 4 HVDC Cables 11 4.1 Description . 11 4.1.1 Self-Contained Fluid Filled Cables . 11 4.1.2 Mass Impregnated Cables . 11 4.1.3 Cross-Linked Poly-Ethylene Cables . 13 4.2 Technical feasibilities . 13 4.3 Stages of Development . 14 4.4 Cost and Lifetime . 14 5 AC-DC Converters 16 5.1 Line Commutated Converters . 16 5.1.1 Description . 16 5.1.2 Technical feasibilities . 16 5.1.3 Stages of Development . 18 5.1.4 Cost and Lifetime . 18 5.2 Voltage Source Converters . 18 5.2.1 Description .
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Integrity of Offshore Wind Turbines
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD Structural Integrity of Offshore Wind Turbines SPECIAL Oversight of Design, Fabrication, and Installation REPORT 305 Special Report 305 Special Report The United States is poised to begin building its first offshore wind energy power projects. To facilitate the orderly development of offshore wind energy and support the stable economic development of this nascent industry, the United States needs Structural Integrity a set of clear requirements that can accommodate design development. In this study, sponsored by the U.S. Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation, and Enforcement (BOEMRE), the committee recom- of Offshore mends that BOEMRE develop a set of performance requirements that establish goals and objectives with regard to structural integrity, environmental performance, and energy generation. Because the committee found that the risks to human life and the Structural Integrity of Offshore Wind Turbines Wind Turbines environment associated with offshore wind farms are substantially lower than for other industries such as offshore oil and gas, it suggests that an approach with significantly less regulatory oversight may be taken for offshore wind farms. Under this approach, indus- Oversight of Design, try would be responsible for proposing sets of standards, guidelines, and recommended Fabrication, and Installation practices that meet the performance requirements established by BOEMRE. Also of Interest Electricity from Renewable Resources: Status, Prospects, and Impediments
    [Show full text]
  • GB Wholesale Market Summary April 2021
    GB Wholesale Market Summary April 2021 Published May 2021 Aurora offers power market forecasts and market intelligence spanning Europe’s key markets, Australia and the US Comprehensive Power Power Market Bespoke Market Services Forecast Reports forecasts Market forecast Power market Aurora can provide ✓ reports ✓ forecast reports ✓ power market forecasts upon Forecast data in Forecast data in request ✓ Excel ✓ Excel Global energy ✓ Analyst support ✓ market forecast reports Strategic insight ✓ reports Regular subscriber ✓ group meetings ✓ Policy updates ✓ Bilateral workshops ✓ Analyst support Source: Aurora Energy Research 2 Month-on-month Year-on-year Monthly value1 Slide reference(s) E x e c u t i v e change change Power prices + 12.4 + 43.5 66.6 5, 6 £/MWh (23.0%) (188.9%) S u m m a r y Gas prices + 3.1 + 13.8 18.5 7 £/MWh (20.3%) (291.4%) Carbon2 prices + 3.4 + 21.0 56.5 7 ▪ April saw power prices rise to £67/MWh £/tCO2 (6.4%) (58.9%) driven by increased gas and carbon Transmission demand - 2.1 + 3.4 prices 20.8 10 TWh (9.2%) (19.3%) ▪ Monthly transmission power demand in Low carbon3 generation - 1.0 - 0.9 April decreased to 21 TWh due to 10.8 11, 12 warmer temperatures TWh (8.5%) (7.6%) Thermal4 generation + 1.1 + 5.14 ▪ Despite lower demand and higher gas 10.4 11, 12 and carbon prices, thermal generation in TWh (11.8%) (97.7%) April increased to 11 TWh due to lower Carbon emissions + 0.3 + 2.1 renewables output 4.5 14 MtCO2e (7.9%) (85.7%) ▪ Higher thermal generation thus resulted Grid carbon intensity + 33.9 + 84.5 239.9 14 in a rise in emissions to 5 MtCO2e gCO2e/kWh (16.5%) (54.4%) Wind load factors5 24.0 - 16 p.p.
    [Show full text]
  • Probabilistic Modelling Techniques and a Robust Design Methodology for Offshore Wind Farms
    PROBABILISTIC MODELLING TECHNIQUES AND A ROBUST DESIGN METHODOLOGY FOR OFFSHORE WIND FARMS A thesis submitted to the University of Manchester for the degree of PhD in the Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences 2012 Muhammad Ali Electrical Energy and Power Systems Group School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering 2 Table of Contents List of Tables ............................................................................................................................ 8 List of Figures .......................................................................................................................... 9 List of Symbols and Abbreviations ................................................................................. 14 Abstract ............................................................................................................................. 24 Declaration ............................................................................................................................. 25 Copyright Statement ........................................................................................................... 26 Acknowledgement ................................................................................................................ 28 Chapter 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 29 1.1 The Need for Improved Modelling and Design ................................................. 32 1.2 Overview of Wind Power Generation ...............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • OSPAR Database on Offshore Wind-Farms, 2014 Update
    OSPAR database on offshore wind-farms 2014 UPDATE (revised in 2015) Biodiversity Series 2015 OSPAR Convention Convention OSPAR The Convention for the Protection of the La Convention pour la protection du milieu Marine Environment of the North-East marin de l'Atlantique du Nord-Est, dite Atlantic (the “OSPAR Convention”) was Convention OSPAR, a été ouverte à la opened for signature at the Ministerial signature à la réunion ministérielle des Meeting of the former Oslo and Paris anciennes Commissions d'Oslo et de Paris, Commissions in Paris on 22 September 1992. à Paris le 22 septembre 1992. La Convention The Convention entered into force on 25 est entrée en vigueur le 25 mars 1998. March 1998. The Contracting Parties are Les Parties contractantes sont l'Allemagne, Belgium, Denmark, the European Union, la Belgique, le Danemark, l’Espagne, la Finland, France, Germany, Iceland, Ireland, Finlande, la France, l’Irlande, l’Islande, le Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Luxembourg, la Norvège, les Pays-Bas, le Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Portugal, le Royaume-Uni de Grande Bretagne Kingdom. et d’Irlande du Nord, la Suède, la Suisse et l’Union européenne. 2 of 17 OSPAR Commission, 2015 OSPAR Database on Offshore Wind-farms – 2014 Update (revised in 2015) The use of any renewable energy source makes a significant contribution towards climate protection and towards placing our energy supply on a sustainable ecological footing, thereby helping to conserve the natural balance. Nevertheless, the utilisation of renewable sources of energy can also have an adverse impact on the environment and our natural resources. Since 2001, OSPAR and its Biodiversity Committee (BDC) have been noting that the offshore wind energy sector has been rapidly expanding in the OSPAR maritime area.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Vessel Requirements for the U.S. Offshore Wind Sector
    Assessment of Vessel Requirements for the U.S. Offshore Wind Sector Prepared for the Department of Energy as subtopic 5.2 of the U.S. Offshore Wind: Removing Market Barriers Grant Opportunity 24th September 2013 Disclaimer This Report is being disseminated by the Department of Energy. As such, the document was prepared in compliance with Section 515 of the Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (Public Law 106-554) and information quality guidelines issued by the Department of Energy. Though this Report does not constitute “influential” information, as that term is defined in DOE’s information quality guidelines or the Office of Management and Budget's Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review (Bulletin), the study was reviewed both internally and externally prior to publication. For purposes of external review, the study and this final Report benefited from the advice and comments of offshore wind industry stakeholders. A series of project-specific workshops at which study findings were presented for critical review included qualified representatives from private corporations, national laboratories, and universities. Acknowledgements Preparing a report of this scope represented a year-long effort with the assistance of many people from government, the consulting sector, the offshore wind industry and our own consortium members. We would like to thank our friends and colleagues at Navigant and Garrad Hassan for their collaboration and input into our thinking and modeling. We would especially like to thank the team at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) who prepared many of the detailed, technical analyses which underpinned much of our own subsequent modeling.
    [Show full text]
  • Offshore Wind Turbine Installation Analyses
    = Offshore Wind Turbine Transportation & Installation Analyses Planning Optimal Marine Operations for Offshore Wind Projects EMRE URAZ Master Thesis Visby, Sweden 2011 Offshore Wind Turbine Transportation & Installation Analyses Planning Optimal Marine Operations for Offshore Wind Projects Master Thesis by Emre URAZ Master Thesis written at Gotland University, June 2011, Department of Wind Energy Supervisor: Richard Koehler HGO, Department of Wind Energy Examiner: Dr. Bahri Uzunoğlu HGO, Department of Wind Energy Abstract Transportation and installation of offshore wind turbines (Tower, Nacelle and Rotor) is a complete process conducted over several phases, usually in sequence. There are several factors that can turn this process into a challenge. These factors can either be due to offshore site conditions or the technical limitations of the installation vessels. Each project has its own characteristic parameters and requires a unique optimum solution. This paper identifies the dynamics of the installation process and analyzes the effects of each phase on the progression of events. The challenges in wind turbine installations due to offshore environment were investigated, the effects of each were explained and their significances were stressed. Special installation vessels were examined and their technical specifications were analyzed in terms of working conditions, dimensions, service performances, and crane capacities as well as projecting future design trends. Several offshore wind farm projects were analyzed; their installation methods were specified, and compared to each other to determine advantages and disadvantages of different pre-assembly concepts. The durations of the sub-phases of the process were defined in terms of different variables such as site conditions and individual vessel performance. These definitions were used for making time estimations, and conducting further analyses regarding the effects of different site specific parameters on the overall project duration.
    [Show full text]