DOCSLIB.ORG

The Badge & Shield

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Badge & Shield The Badge & Shield Membership News Letter - July 2013 “I have a gun in my pocket and a lawyer by my side” Unconventional & Alternative Self Defense Weapons Index Air Gun Alcoholic Drink in a Plastic Cup or Glass Archery Ashtray Ballpoint Writing Pen Belt Belt-Buckle Bicycle Black Powder Book Broom Canes Car Antenna Car Cell Phone Chair Coffee Mug, Glass, or Ceramic Cup Clip Board Clothing Coins Comb Dresser Drawer Duct Tape Edge Weapons Fire Extinguisher Flashlight Glass Bottle Hand Iron Keys Lamp Laptop Light Switch Magazine Mind Neck Tie Padlock Pepper Spray Umbrella Steel Capped Boots Stun Gun Thrown Weapons Trash Can Lid Sticks Stones Voice _____________________________________________________________________ Reminder as a member you are covered for the use of all of these self-defense weap- ons and more. Also as a member free training classes are taught by professional in- structors. All training DVD’s are available on the website. There is a reason people use firearms for defense and hunting— they just work, plain and simple. But many people in this country live in places that don’t allow firearms, or for some reason or another, they do not wish to own a firearm. There are still many ways you can make sure you are equipped to protect yourself, hunt for food, or just enjoy a fun hobby with some alternative weapons. When considering alternatives to firearms, it is best to forget everything you have learned at the movies and look at what each weapon is capable of doing in the real world. The whole point of a defensive weapon is to stop, disable, or kill the person or animal attacking you as quickly and as efficiently as possible. Some so-called weapons can be worse than useless against an attacker. We do not advocating violence. Instead we recommend training for real world incidents that could crop up at any time. It is best to learn how to avoid an attack and not just survive one. Your mind is the best weapon you have. A person who has the right motivation, tal- ent, and the will to survive can employ almost any object as a weapon. Governments can't ban them and customs can not confiscate them. Many common items can serve as valuable alternative self-defense weapons; some of which you may never have considered for this purpose. For instance, a nail file is effec- tive when stabbed at sensitive areas such as the face, neck, or groin. A simple ball- point pen can serve the same purpose. An umbrella, the variety with a pointed tip, makes for a powerful thrusting weapon. Aerosol hairsprays can sometimes work as well as pepper spray if aimed at the attacker's eyes. When danger strikes, be resource- ful and use anything in sight as an alternative self-defense weapon. Always remember, even if you're busy defending yourself with an unconventional weapon, to call for help so law enforcement can deal with the attacker. In today's anti-weapons climate many times and in many locations it is impossible to carry a gun or knife (Courts, airports, etc). Even in your home at the time of a violent invasion you might not be close to your gun, or even knife. Sometimes all you have left is your tactical creativity and your motivation and ability for thinking outside the box. Your mind will always be your greatest weapon, not least of all because with your in- telligence and ingenuity you can locate the most effective, commonly found objects in any house of office, to use as weapons during an assault. Wherever you are you are surrounded by a multitude of potential weapons. While the will to use improvised weapons is often instinctive for the experienced fighter, the effectiveness of such improvised weapons can depend on how good an eye you have in not only quickly locating and choosing your improvised "weapon" but also on your ability to use that object in a way that will disable your attacker effectively or allow you to escape the threat. First let us look at the normal processes of you mind and natural reactions. What is the first natural reaction a person has when being attacked? Most of the time a person will put up their arms to block any attack, then they will in- stinctively grab for any object that can multiply the expediency of that weapon. Often one of the first such objects grabbed is a chair and it is used as a shield. If not a chair it will be another object that can be used as either a weapon or shield. It's an instinc- tive and natural reaction displayed by seasoned fighters and people with no experience in self-defense. Generally not much thought goes into such a split second decision in terms of exactly which object to grab. There simply isn't enough time for someone who is being at- tacked to weigh the potential effectiveness of one object over another. Almost any ob- ject can be used as either a weapon or a shield. You probably never thought of some of the following objects as weapons or even shields. The following is a list of a few possible objects you very well might have in your environment that could be employed as improvised weapons or shields: Index Your Voice: Your voice can be a great improvised weapon wherever you are. Verbally you can of- ten stop, control or at very least influence the direction of an attack. You should learn about verbal commands and communication skills for defensive purposes in order to redirect an attacker's violent behavior toward you. This is sometimes known as verbal judo. Your Hand: A general rule is for a hard target use a soft weapon and for a soft target use a hard weapon. This may seem strange, but the concept can save you from breaking bones in the hand while you defend yourself. To learn to strike safely with full force make sure you first know what part of the hand to use to strike what sort of target. Let’s start with the first half of the rule, “Hard Target, Soft Weapon”. When striking at a “hard target” such as the jaw bone, head, or the area around the nose and eyes, use an open hand. Boxers and mixed martial artists all wrap their hands and wear some type of glove. These safety measures are not there to protect their opponent; they are used to protect their own hands. The small bones of the hand are easily bro- ken, especially if you hit a hard object such as the human skull or jaw bone. Known as the “Boxer’s Fracture,” breaking the bones of the hand will quickly disable the hand and make self defense much harder. To avoid breaking your hands, and to make sure you can “stay in the fight” and protect yourself, deliver strikes to the head with open hands. Using the soft parts of the hand, the palm heel and top edge of the palm, you can deliver full force while still protecting your bones. The Palm Heel is the area along the bottom of the palm where the hand meets the wrist. Used to deliver direct line strikes, this part of the hand is capable of delivering the same bone breaking force as a jab or cross, perfect for strike to the eye sockets and nose. The Palm Heel Strike is more than capable of breaking your attacker’s nose and knocking out teeth. The other part of the hand that makes an effective self de- fense strike is the “meaty” section of the hand where the fingers meet the top of the palm. To use this part of the hand, use what is known as the “Combat Slap.” Using a similar motion to a good hook, open the hand and flex the fingers back and strike with the exposed ridge. This is very different from the normal slap most people use. A nor- mal slap makes contact with the fingers, which flex back and absorb some of the force. In the “Combat Slap” all of your power is delivered into your target, just like a hook in boxing. The “Combat Slap” is perfect for strikes to the jaw and temple and can result in broken jaws and knockouts, with less chance of breaking your own hand in the pro- cess. Index The second half of the rule, “Soft Target, Hard Weapon,” is just as important. When striking a soft target such as muscle it is best to use a hard weapon. This is where you employ a fist to deliver maximum damage. Punches should only be applied to areas such as the stomach, legs, and shoulders. Punching to the chest, ribs, and sternum can result in broken hand bones. Punching high in the stomach can be used to drive the air from an attacker’s lungs while punching low in the stomach area can do painful damage to the bladder. Punching to the shoulder, between the neck and shoulder cap, can break the collar bone and disable the arm. A punch further out on the front of the shoulder, where the shoulder cap meets the pectoral muscle, can easily numb the en- tire arm and provide time for you to escape and seek help. No matter what your tar- get, please exercise caution when striking with a closed fist. Striking with the first two or first three knuckles is safe; the bones in that section of the hand are strong enough to take the force of impact.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Limiting Terrorist Use of Advanced Conventional Weapons
    THE ARTS This PDF document was made available CHILD POLICY from www.rand.org as a public service of CIVIL JUSTICE the RAND Corporation. EDUCATION ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT Jump down to document6 HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit NATIONAL SECURITY research organization providing POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY objective analysis and effective SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY solutions that address the challenges SUBSTANCE ABUSE facing the public and private sectors TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY around the world. TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE Support RAND WORKFORCE AND WORKPLACE Purchase this document Browse Books & Publications Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore RAND Homeland Security Program View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. This product is part of the RAND Corporation monograph series. RAND monographs present major research findings that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND mono- graphs undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity. Stealing theSword Limiting Terrorist Use of Advanced Conventional Weapons James Bonomo Giacomo Bergamo David R.
    [Show full text]
  • Improvised Firearms in the Collection of the Forensic Laboratory
    FORENSIC PRACTICE Sławomir Kudełka Forensic Laboratory, Voivodeship Police Headquarters in Kraków [email protected] Tomasz Konopka Department of Forensic Medicine, Collegium Medicum, Jagiellonian University [email protected] Improvised firearms in the collection of the Forensic Laboratory, Voivodeship Police Headquarters in Kraków and the Department of Forensic Medicine, Collegium Medicum, Jagiellonian University — towards a systematics Summary Despite a very large variety of improvised firearms, repeatability of certain actions of the manufacturers can be observed, reflecting the purpose to which such weapons are produced (e.g. poaching), and the availability of appropriate technologies. The aim of this article is to make an attempt to systematize improvised firearms on the basis of the expert opinions elaborated at the Weapon Research and Ballistics Department of the Voivodeship Police Headquarters in Kraków (LK KWP) as well as studies carried out on weapons belonging to the collection of the Department of Forensic Medicine (ZMS) in Kraków. Research material included both primitive devices made by using simple methods and without concern for accuracy or aesthetics, as well as fine-tuned pieces with individual design solutions or copies of factory-made weapons. Improvised firearms can generally be divided into conversions and own designs. The conversion most frequently applies to alarm, gas or pneumatic weapons. It consists in removing factory safety mechanisms or, in the case of pneumatic weapons, in introducing technical modifications, which enable to blast off the cartridge and discharge the projectile by means of gas pressure arising during combustion of the propellant. Own designs may contain certain factory elements, most frequently the barrel, however, in most cases, they are manufactured from scratch.
    [Show full text]
  • JP 3-11, Operations in Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear Environments, 04 October 2013
    Joint Publication 3-11 OF NT TH E E W M I S E' L L H D T E F T E N A R D R A M P Y E D • • U A N C I I T R E E D M S A T F AT E S O Operations in Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear Environments 29 October 2018 PREFACE 1. Scope This publication provides doctrine for planning, conducting, and assessing military operations in chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear environments. 2. Purpose This publication has been prepared under the direction of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (CJCS). It sets forth joint doctrine to govern the activities and performance of the Armed Forces of the United States in joint operations, and it provides considerations for military interaction with governmental and nongovernmental agencies, multinational forces, and other interorganizational partners. It provides military guidance for the exercise of authority by combatant commanders and other joint force commanders (JFCs), and prescribes joint doctrine for operations and training. It provides military guidance for use by the Armed Forces in preparing and executing their plans and orders. It is not the intent of this publication to restrict the authority of the JFC from organizing the force and executing the mission in a manner the JFC deems most appropriate to ensure unity of effort in the accomplishment of objectives. 3. Application a. Joint doctrine established in this publication applies to the Joint Staff, commanders of combatant commands, subordinate unified commands, joint task forces, subordinate components of these commands, the Services, and combat support agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Denver Police Department Operations Manual
    Denver Police Department Operations Manual 100.00 - Patrol Division and General Procedures 105.00 Use of Force 105.02 Less Lethal Force and Control Options (1) POLICY: The primary duty of police officers is to protect the public, themselves and other officers. Less lethal force and control options may assist officers in performing these duties, but are not intended to substitute for the use of deadly force when it is reasonable and necessary. There is neither a requirement nor an expectation that officers attempt to use or exhaust less lethal options in situations requiring the use of deadly force. (2) LESS LETHAL OPTIONS The Denver Police Department authorizes the use of Electronic Restraints Devices (ERD)/TASER, Pepper Ball deployment systems, twelve (12) gauge and forty (40) mm specialty impact munitions to be carried by certain officers in their normal duty assignments. (3) LESS LETHAL WEAPONS DEFINITIONS a. Less lethal: A concept of planning and force application which meets an operational or tactical objective, with less potential for causing death or serious injury than conventional more lethal police tactics. b. Less lethal weapon: Any apprehension or restraint device approved for carry, which when used as designed and intended has less potential for causing death or serious injury than conventional police lethal weapons. Less lethal weapons include Electronic Restraints Devices (ERD/TASER), Pepper Ball deployment systems, less lethal twelve (12) gauge shotguns and forty (40) mm projectile systems and others as approved by the Chief of Police. c. Less lethal officer: An officer trained in the principles of less lethal force and the use of less lethal weapons.
    [Show full text]
  • Easier Said Than Done: Legal Reviews of Cyber Weapons
    Easier Said Than Done: Legal Reviews of Cyber Weapons Gary D. Brown* & Andrew O. Metcalf** INTRODUCTION On June 1, 2012, author and New York Times reporter David Sanger created a sensation within the cyber-law community. Just over a year previously, Vanity Fair, among other media outlets, reported that a malware package of unprec- edented complexity had effectively targeted the Iranian nuclear research pro- gram.1 The malware, which came to be known as Stuxnet, was also discovered on many computer systems outside Iran, but it did not appear to do any damage to these other systems. Just as the discussions spurred by the discovery of Stuxnet had begun to die down, the New York Times published an interview with Mr. Sanger to discuss his newest book, in which he alleged that the Stuxnet malware had been part of a U.S. planned and led covert cyber operation. The assertion that a nation state had used a “cyber attack” in support of its national objectives reinvigorated the attention of cyber-law commentators, both in and out of government. What makes Stuxnet interesting as a point of discussion is that the basic functioning of the software is easy to understand and easy to categorize. A piece of software was deliberately inserted into the target systems, and physical damage was the result. However, resulting physical damage is not characteristic of most cyber operations, and the legal analysis of Stuxnet is of limited utility when examining a broad range of cyber activities.2 A distinct lack of physical effects is much more characteristic of cyber operations, and the absence of physical effects has continued to complicate the legal analysis of cyber in the context of military operations.
    [Show full text]
  • Fma-Digest-Vol4-No1.Pdf
    Publisher Steven K. Dowd Contributing Writers Bee Landrum Malcolm Knight Mike Macro Vincent Palumbo Ron England Allan Duncan Khalid Khan Contents From the Publishers Desk Carlito Bonjoc Jr. World Nickelstick Eskrima Club Senior Instructor Jose Valencia Tan Strength in Motion The South Australian Stickfighting Alliance Crow’s Martial Arts Academy Ola’a-Nalo Eskrima Oakland Eskrima Club DAMAG-INC Martial Arts a Tool to Educate People The British Council of Kali Eskrima Arnis Instructors Cultural Awareness - mandirigma.org Sunday School FMA Past Events FMA Future Events Filipino Martial Arts Digest is published and distributed by: FMAdigest 1297 Eider Circle Fallon, Nevada 89406 Visit us on the World Wide Web: www.fmadigest.com The FMAdigest is published quarterly. Each issue features practitioners of martial arts and other internal arts of the Philippines. Other features include historical, theoretical and technical articles; reflections, Filipino martial arts, healing arts and other related subjects. The ideas and opinions expressed in this digest are those of the authors or instructors being interviewed and are not necessarily the views of the publisher or editor. We solicit comments and/or suggestions. Articles are also welcome. The authors and publisher of this digest are not responsible for any injury, which may result from following the instructions contained in the digest. Before embarking on any of the physical activates described in the digest, the reader should consult his or her physician for advice regarding their individual suitability for performing such activity. From the Publishers Desk Kumusta This is the first issue of 2007. 2006 was a great year for issues, besides the regular 4 Issues; there were 11 Special Issues and 12 Special Editions, packed with information on and for the Filipino martial arts practitioners.
    [Show full text]
  • Improvised Weapons
    Updated Apr 2009 The purpose of this presentation is to make you better aware of the numerous improvised weapons and ingenious hiding places that have been created and are in use by today’s criminals. The majority of the material used in this presentation comes from various law enforcement officer safety bulletins throughout the world. This presentation attempts to combine information from those bulletins into one easy to view presentation. In the interest of keeping the focus to the threat on hand, many of the circumstances surrounding the identification of these items has been removed. Knowledge is safety. Unless you stay informed, danger will find you… Improvised Weapon Any item that has been designed, modified, or disguised to function as a weapon. California’s Dangerous Weapon Law (12020 P.C.) 12020(a) PC Any person in this state who does any of the following is punishable by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year or in the state prison: (1) Manufactures or causes to be manufactured, imports into the state, keeps for sale, or offers or exposes for sale, or who gives, lends, or possesses any cane gun or wallet gun, any undetectable firearm, any firearm which is not immediately recognizable as a firearm, any camouflaging firearm container, any ammunition which contains or consists of any flechette dart, any bullet containing or carrying an explosive agent, any ballistic knife, any multiburst trigger activator, any nunchaku, any short-barreled shotgun, any short-barreled rifle, any metal knuckles, any belt buckle knife, any leaded cane, any zip gun, any shuriken, any unconventional pistol, any lipstick case knife, any cane sword, any shobi-zue, any air gauge knife, any writing pen knife, any metal military practice handgrenade or metal replica hand grenade, or any instrument or weapon of the kind commonly known as a blackjack, slungshot, billy, sandclub, sap, or sandbag.
    [Show full text]
  • Second Amendment Decision Rules, Non-Lethal Weapons, and Self-Defense A.J
    Marquette Law Review Volume 97 Article 8 Issue 3 Spring 2014 Second Amendment Decision Rules, Non-Lethal Weapons, and Self-Defense A.J. Peterman [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/mulr Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, and the Second Amendment Commons Repository Citation A.J. Peterman, Second Amendment Decision Rules, Non-Lethal Weapons, and Self-Defense, 97 Marq. L. Rev. 853 (2014). Available at: http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/mulr/vol97/iss3/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Marquette Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Marquette Law Review by an authorized administrator of Marquette Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PETERMAN-10 (DO NOT DELETE) 7/2/2014 5:25 PM SECOND AMENDMENT DECISION RULES, NON-LETHAL WEAPONS, AND SELF- DEFENSE General public debate about the Second Amendment has focused almost exclusively on the regulation of firearms. After Heller and McDonald, the scope of the Second Amendment’s protection has been hotly contested. One area of the Second Amendment that has been less discussed is the decisional rules that would govern non-firearms and levels of protection based on location. This Comment proposes two Second Amendment Constitutional decisional rules. Broadly, this Comment suggests that the “common use” test for “arms” should be modified for the development of new arms, such as non-lethal weapons, that are subject to the Second Amendment. The proposed “common use for the self-defense purpose” test attempts to add more precision by tying the weapon to the individual right to self-defense.
    [Show full text]
  • Self-Defence with a Walking-Stick: Revisited DAVID BROUGH
    CONTRIBUTOR Self-Defence with a Walking-stick: Revisited DAVID BROUGH DOI ABSTRACT 10.18573/mas.132 Primarily an aid to assist mobility (or in the case of the umbrella, to stay dry) the walking stick also has a history as an object of considerable martial value. This article discusses the development of the walking stick as a martial art weapon within the British Isles over the last two centuries. From before the Victorian era KEYWORDs the Irish Blackthorn was considered to be the best stick for self- defence purposes. In the late Victorian and Edwardian period Walking stick, Blackthorn, the stylish fashion accessory, the Malacca cane, was the fulcrum Malacca cane, Bartitsu, Pierre of the cane fighting system developed by French Master at Arms Vigny, Barton-Wright, Jujutsu Pierre Vigny. This was assimilated into the early British fighting system of bartitsu, developed by Edward William Barton-Wright. The walking stick persisted in the background throughout the CITATION development of jujutsu in the U.K. and further evolved with the introduction of Eastern fighting systems such as hanbo jutsu Brough, David. 2021. ‘Self- and . The last 20 years saw the bartitsu method undergo Defence with a Walking Stick: a renaissance following its rediscovery. Thus in the context of Revisited’. Martial Arts Studies British jujutsu and self-defence, it may be considered that the 11, 101-109. walking stick has undergone several evolutions as a weapon, with doi: 10.18573/mas.132 each evolution reflecting distinct influences and ideals, and each one effective in the hands of the knowledgeable user. MARTIAL Self-Defence with a Walking-Stick: Revisited ARTS STUDIES David Brough Sometimes thought to be the preserve of Asian fighting systems, of Shaikh Rahmatullah al-Farooq.
    [Show full text]
  • Weapons SIMPLE MELEE WEAPONS One-Handed Weapon Typical Materials Prof
    Nonmetal Weapons SIMPLE MELEE WEAPONS One-Handed Weapon Typical Materials Prof. Damage Range Price Weight Group Properties Source Atlatl (Javelin) Bone or stone tip, wood shaft +2 1d6 10/20 5 gp 2 lb. Spear Heavy thrown PHB Club Bone or wood shaft +2 1d6 - 1 gp 3 lb. Mace - PHB Quabone (Mace) Bone head and shaft +2 1d8 - 5 gp 6 lb. Mace Versatile AD&D (PHB) Spear Bone or stone tip, wood shaft +2 1d8 - 5 gp 6 lb. Spear Versatile PHB Talid (Spiked gauntlet)1 Bone spikes, leather glove +2 1d6 - 5 gp 1 lb. Unarmed Off-hand DSCS (AV) Widow's knife (Dagger) Bone or stone blade, bone or wood grip +3 1d4 5/10 1 gp 1 lb. Light blade Light thrown, off-hand DSCS (PHB) Wrist Razors Bone or stone blades, leather bracer +3 1d4 - 1 gp 1 lb. Light blade Off-hand DSCS Two-Handed Weapon Typical Materials Prof. Damage Range Price Weight Group Properties Source Greatclub Bone or wood shaft +2 2d4 - 1 gp 10 lb. Mace - PHB Quarterstaff Wood shaft +2 1d8 - 5 gp 4 lb. Staff - PHB MILITARY MELEE WEAPONS One-Handed Weapon Typical Materials Prof. Damage Range Price Weight Group Properties Source Alhulak Bone head, leather strap or rope, wood handle +3 1d8 - 20 gp 5 lb. Flail Versatile DSCS Carrikal Bone head, wood handle +2 1d8 - 15 gp 6 lb. Axe Brutal 2 DSCS Flail Stone weight, leather strap or rope, wood handle +2 1d10 - 10 gp 5 lb. Flail Versatile PHB Handaxe Stone head, wood handle +2 1d6 5/10 5 gp 3 lb.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrorist and Insurgent Teleoperated Sniper Rifles and Machine Guns Robert J
    Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont CGU Faculty Publications and Research CGU Faculty Scholarship 1-1-2016 Terrorist and Insurgent Teleoperated Sniper Rifles and Machine Guns Robert J. Bunker Claremont Graduate University Alma Keshavarz Claremont Graduate University Recommended Citation Bunker, R. J. (2016). Terrorist and Insurgent Teleoperated Sniper Rifles and Machine Guns. Foreign Military Studies Office (FMSO), 1-40. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the CGU Faculty Scholarship at Scholarship @ Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in CGU Faculty Publications and Research by an authorized administrator of Scholarship @ Claremont. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WL KNO EDGE NCE ISM SA ER IS E A TE N K N O K C E N N T N I S E S J E N A 3 V H A A N H Z И O E P W O I T E D N E Z I A M I C O N O C C I O T N S H O E L C A I N M Z E N O T Terrorist and Insurgent Teleoperated Sniper Rifles and Machine Guns ROBERT J. BUNKER and ALMA KESHAVARZ August 2016 Open Source, Foreign Perspective, Underconsidered/Understudied Topics The Foreign Military Studies Office (FMSO) at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, is an open source research organization of the U.S. Army. It was founded in 1986 as an innovative program that brought together military specialists and civilian academics to focus on military and security topics derived from unclassified, foreign media. Today FMSO maintains this research tradition of special insight and highly collaborative work by conducting unclassified research on foreign perspectives of defense and security issues that are understudied or unconsidered.
    [Show full text]
  • Episode 360 – Sifu Glen Doyle | Whistlekickmartialartsradio.Com
    Episode 360 – Sifu Glen Doyle | whistlekickMartialArtsRadio.com Jeremy Lesniak: Hello and welcome to this show. This is whistlekick Martial Arts Radio episode 360. Today, I'm joined by Sifu Glen Doyle. My name is Jeremy. I'm the founder at whistlekick. I'm your host on the show. And martial arts is a huge part of my life. So huge that it became my career. You can check out all the things that we work on at whistlekick. Many of those things, I am personally involved in over at whistlekick.com. Don't forget. If you buy something, use the code PODCAST15. Save this 15%. It's a thank you from us to you and honestly, lets us know that this podcast is worth doing. Because let's face it. This is a business and we've got to make some money somewhere because I need to it. Not a lot but I do need to eat something. Here we are, 360 episodes in and we're still finding new martial arts to talk about. Did you know that there were Irish martial arts traditions? Well, today's guest not only has family lineage through Irish martial arts but also something that most of us would consider more contemporary, more conventional in that Kung Fu. So, we not only get to talk about each of those arts but the contrasts, the similarities between the two, and the wonderful story that unfolds as Sifu Doyle talks about his life and his navigation through both of those arts and what it meant to him and his family.
    [Show full text]