DOCSLIB.ORG

Submarine Cable Almanac

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Finished size: 8.5 x 9.75 Submarine Cable Almanac his Spring, SubTel Forum will release its first annual Submarine Cable Almanac. This perfect bound book will serve as complement to our Submarine Cable Map and will feature each major Tinternational system on its own page, along with full-color adverts from some of the most important players in the industry. The Submarine Cable Almanac will be mailed free of charge to our subscriber list, including senior government and international organization officials, telecom company executives and team, support and supply company management, and technical, sales and purchasing staff, field and shipboard personnel, academicians, consultants, financiers, and legal specialists. Almanac ads due: 15 March 2011 Sponsorship Cost: US$5000 per advertising insert Bata Uganda Libreville Congo Gabon ADONES Rwanda Burundi Pointe Noire Cabinda Congo, DRC Muanda Soyo Nzeto Luanda Porto Amboim ADONES South Benguela Angola Lucira Atlantic Zambia Ocean Namibe Zimbabwe Landing points: Cabinda, Soyo,Namibia Nzeto, Luanda, Porto Amboim, Benguela,Swakopmund Lucira, Botswana Walvis Bay Namibe Initial capacity: 30 Gbps Maputo Design capacity: 80 Gbps South Africa Mtunzini Length: 1800 km Durban RFS year: 2009 Melkbosstrand Cape Town Ad Specifications: Almanac Ad without bleeds Ad with bleeds Size: 5.5” W x 8.5” H Size: 5.75” W x 8.75” H Bleeds: n/a Bleeds: .125” Resolution: 300 dpi Resolution: 300 dpi Please note the sizes above and determine which size to send your artwork. Adverts should be provided in Press Quality PDF format and should include crop marks. Almanac ads due: 15 March 2011 Sponsorship Cost: US$5000 per advertising insert Finished size: 8.5 x 10.375 Submarine Cable Map ubmarine Cables of The World is an annual poster that reflects known international submarine cable systems at the time of printing. This cable map is a golden opportunity for our advertisers. SSponsors’ adverts are placed prominently around the cable map, which is mailed free of charge to our subscriber list, including senior government and international organization officials, telecom company executives and team, support and supply company management, and technical, sales and purchasing staff, field and shipboard personnel, academicians, consultants, financiers, and legal specialists. According to a 2009 survey, 64% of respondents use our cable map on a regular basis. The finished size of calendar ads is 4” W x 1.5” H or 1.5” W x 4” H. Adverts should be provided in Press Quality PDF format and should not include crop marks. Voice of the Submarine Cables of The World Industry wfnstrategies.com 2011 Edition Svalbard Arctic Hotellneset Arctic Ocean Ocean Greenland Svalbard Svalbard ink ticL Arc Arc ticLink Prudhoe Bay Andøy Harstad Sweden Seyðisfjörður Iceland Fa Nuuk ri ce -1 Umea Landeyjarsandur Bo Vestmannaeyjar tnia Vaasa Finland Danice Tjørnuvík Russia Tórshavn Norway -1 Anchorage Valdez ect AC onn TampNett BCS East-West Interlink rs d C fo Whittier Qaqortoq lan g reen Kollsnes Sandviken in Kenai G -3 SFS-4 Turku ls Kotka TAT SFS-4 e Seward CAN F Maywick Mariehamn H a Vaddo Helsinki r i Hango Homer i c Norrtälje th a T-14 e BCS Nor n TA - Tysvær Stockholm Meremoisa Kingisepp n Canada 1 SHEFA-2 vsnas inn e Sta all K Ar T Ayre of Cara Kr den Estonia-Sweden 1 Kärdla k istia dal Denmark-Norway 5 Estonia ia Juneau nsa d Dunnet Bay nd Pangea Baltic Ring o Denmark-Norway 6 K Hawk Inlet Kodiak Jutland d Ventspils-Gotland 3 n - Gothenburg u Angoon Banff T Hjrorring s Ventspils Narrow Cape A 1 rö T - å Sitka N Thisted F Petersburg A C om Liepaja Latvia C Greenland Connect Danica SEAK Wrangell a Denmark Sventoji e Tuborg Barseback Saltcoats S Copenhagen Bjarred Denmark-Russia Ketchikan or Blaabjerg EA N Sc Ring Lithuania Coleraine ANG Dueodde Redcar P Westerland ntic Carrickfergus UK-Germany 6 Atla Scarborough Puttgarden BALTICA Mielno nia- Sirius Dutch Harbor ber TGN Kolobrzeg A Hi ESAT-2 N. Europe Denmark-Poland 2 K Ireland Southport Norden Denmark-Germany 2 North O A Dublin Belarus R la Holyhead De Marne N sk Hibernia-Atlantic a Beverwijk Un it CeltixConnect Pacific ed Ar United Kingdom W ctic Kilmore Quay Whitesands Bay Poland N e Lin or st 14 k Broadstairs k th T- Highbridge Bruges in St TA Ocean ticL ar Seaford Germany rc North Calais A Widemouth Bay Belgium P S T A Cayeux-sur-Mer 1 H E - E C C A A u C C A I T Pacific R g - Czech Republic - Port Alberni 1 - o M 1 C 4 T-3 E E Ukraine A - A NEPTUNE T Lannion FA-1 W Slovakia Ocean la Milton AN sk C Plerin E a Harbor Pointe - Kazakhstan c 3 Un tlanti antic Penmarch We it ia-A -Atl ress Austria ed ibern TGN ct Exp E H Proje a A Moldova st E St. Hilaire Hungary Mongolia Nevelsk FA-1 F France Switzerland Odesa Odesa C-1 Warrenton P S Nedonna Beach C Romania S tlantic antic k A tl H in ve rnia- GN-A Croatia icL g Co Hibe T A rct Halifax errin IC A ific H FR Novorossiysk Novorossiysk engineer ac int C-2 3 A Savona N P t Po A - UR TG Florence an E E TGN Western Europe ss enn Monaco Mangalia Cro P P W CS ern ollo - FO Sochi uth C Ap S So Bandon E Bilbao Marseille Italy B - S Varna R Ishikari 1 c M U anti C - Yugoslavia IT Atl 4 K Nakhodka nia- AT-1 A A -4 Dubrovnik Lynn ber T A Georgia-Russia Hi -1 W E Vigo MW E Bulgaria US S S -W Bar F Cauc Poti N 1 V E ADRIA-1 O asu TPE CA ss - SA -M Ajaccio s Cable xpre O R I S Sys T t E tem rojec L Barcelona BA CORSAR Georgia Uzbekistan Kyrgyzstan G Brookhaven Durres telecoms P E G C E Aranci Bari Istanbul R N rt llpo I M Northport Be C-1 A G O J R A C P A K H E J I a S h C cific Island Park Apollo Portugal ort J N Pa c Spain N Armenia Azerbaijan N TG i Manasquan E Otranto f T 1 Corfu I Akita PC- i 2 -1 e T N. Korea c United States FA r ne Tuckerton o Ses Covetes ria U h A Point Arena C R - Lisbon fs Greece Turkmenistan Tajikistan 1 B f Turkey - U Seixal O ALPAL-2 S a S ble Sendai an-U S Ca anywhere ap c Sesimbra ed J i M Lechaina Niigata t C A Palermo Koropi Ponta Delgada L OS-1 n A T Catania EM a l M G A t P K Naoetsu e EIG Bizerte oza RJ A m FEA llo Marmaris China T Chipiona Taean Matsutou Kitaibaraki in Cadiz Estepona Annaba TPC-5 P i North Conil El Djemila Algiers Kelibia Ajigaura C E M Qingdao Ibaraki - Columbus III S. Korea 5 Morro Bay Gibraltar O Japan Japan-US A SEA-ME-WE-3 Asilah M FL S Kumihama -US t Teutan I AG -1 C Pusan Ninomiya China San Luis Obispo la N HA Chania II Asilah Columbus II W Cyprus A Keoje Hamada n Atlantic s E K Tartus TGN Pacific t u E Grover Beach i b R G Syria Toyohashi ca m B T - olu V ICS Med P Shima cific 1 C A Na E TGN Pa utilus Beirut Kitakyushu Casablanca Kochi Hermosa Beach Ocean LEV Tripoli Afghanistan FEA E Fukuoka IH a-US EIG A J TPC-5 Chin s Tripoli Nahariya US Tijuana u Iraq C China- x St. David's Bermuda Tunisia Darnah Haifa Iran 5 op TPE 10 years ~ 2001-2011 e Funchal an C- Lo AC N k TP ia P n Benghazi rd Miyazaki s l er i Tel Aviv o Chongming . A a alleng aL Morocco J h N G b Ch n Alexandria ac AP o a e l C Nanhui g/R Unity Columbus II a 2 T G Israel Fl CN PC-1 Pascagoula A AP P E E Suez Al Faw EAC-C2C F Ras Sidr Kuwait-Iran APCN2 Aqaba J A Kuwait City Kharg Pakistan C- Japa m Zafarana TPE n-US e Te Bushehr ri ne FEA P c rif A C s a El Me e Alta Vista -1 ros Ingleside s dano Algeria FOG China-US J Midway Is. C P-GOM I Sardinia GBICS p C rn B Vero Beach S Nepal N o e t A SEA-ME-WE-3 C o th or M Bandar Abbas L ou ity BAHAMAS-2 ep C P ia S n re BICS o -1 3 Bhutan A s -5 U West Palm Beach F l M - Libya Okinawa A PC u A T th T m Al-Khobar Khasab r C A Egypt Fuzhou No b S TPE g/ G u G a AA s Sumaisma Halul Fl I Chabahar Pali P -US S PAC I 1 Das Dubai A China -U e Nassau III - Karachi Tanshui 2 an r us e Fujairah CN ap b Key West A b O n Toucheng AP J i S m L Bangladesh F e m olu O Western Sahara c a e C G Abu Dhabi fi h r in Saudi Arabia i Mexico o ic Al Seeb c r a a Shantou a Mazatlán TeleCuba s s 2 FA Taiwan Jap P ARCOS-1 e - M U.A.E.
Recommended publications
  • Telecommunications/Icts for Rural and Remote Areas Output Report on ITU-D Question 5/1 Telecommunications/Icts for Rural and Remote Areas

    Telecommunications/Icts for Rural and Remote Areas Output Report on ITU-D Question 5/1 Telecommunications/Icts for Rural and Remote Areas

    ITUPublications International Telecommunication Union Study period 2018-2021 Development Sector Study Group 1 Question 5 Telecommunications/ICTs for rural and remote areas Output Report on ITU-D Question 5/1 Telecommunications/ICTs for rural and remote areas Study period 2018-2021 Telecommunications/ICTs for rural and remote: Output Report on ITU-D Question 5/1 for the study period 2018-2021 ISBN 978-92-61-34591-4 (Electronic version) ISBN 978-92-61-34601-0 (EPUB version) ISBN 978-92-61-34611-9 (Mobi version) © International Telecommunication Union 2021 International Telecommunication Union, Place des Nations, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland Some rights reserved. This work is licensed to the public through a Creative Commons Attribution- Non- Commercial-Share Alike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO). Under the terms of this licence, you may copy, redistribute and adapt the work for non-commercial purposes, provided the work is appropriately cited, as indicated below. In any use of this work, there should be no suggestion that ITU endorses any specific organization, product or service. The unauthorized use of the ITU name or logo is not permitted. If you adapt the work, then you must license your work under the same or equivalent Creative Commons licence. If you create a transla- tion of this work, you should add the following disclaimer along with the suggested citation: “This translation was not created by the International Telecommunication Union (ITU). ITU is not respon- sible for the content or accuracy of this translation. The original English edition shall be the binding and authentic edition”.
  • TABLE 7 - Trans-Ocean Fiber Optic Cable Capacity

    TABLE 7 - Trans-Ocean Fiber Optic Cable Capacity

    TABLE 7 - Trans-Ocean Fiber Optic Cable Capacity Table 7 - Continued - Construction cost sources: Cable Source Trans - Atlantic - Operational: TAT-8 98 FCC 2 nd 447 (1984) PTAT 100 FCC 2 nd 1036 (1985) TAT-9 4 FCC Rcd 1130 (1989) TAT-10 7 FCC Rcd 445 (1992) TAT-11 7 FCC Rcd 136 (1992) TAT-12/13 8 FCC Rcd 4811 (1993) CANTAT-3 www.athens.actinc.bc.ca/ACT/news.oct/cable.html, downloaded 3/10/1997. Columbus II Application, filed on November 10, 1992, File No. ITC-93-029. CANUS-1 n.a. Atlantic Crossing (AC-1) www.submarinesystems.com/tssl/newswire/netherlands.htm, downloaded 12/15/99. Gemini www.cwplc.com/press/1996/p96oct28.htm, downloaded 6/18/1998. Columbus III www.att.com/press/0298/980211.cia.html, downloaded 7/1/1998. Level 3 www.simplextech.com/news/pr990511.html, downloaded 12/01/1999. TAT-14 www.francetelecomna.com/nr/nr_prre/nr_prre_9-2-98_tat.htm, downloaded 12/14/1999. FLAG Atlantic - 1 www.flagatlantic.com/gts_and_flag_131099.htm, downloaded 12/14/1999. Hibernia Atlantic (formerly 360atlantic) www.worldwidefiber.com/html/news_14july1999.html, downloaded 11/29/1999. Tyco Atlantic n.a. Apollo www.techweb.com/wire/story/TWB20010112S0004, downloaded 10/15/2003. Americas - Operational: Americas I Application, filed on November 10, 1992, File No. ITC-93-030 TCS-1 5 FCC Rcd 101 (1990) Taino-Carb 7 FCC Rcd 4275 (1992) BAHAMAS II n.a. Antillas I n.a. Pan American Cable System www.twoten.press.net/stories/headlines/BUSINESS_mci_Cable.html, downloaded 2/27/98. Americas II www.investors.tycoint.com/news/19980302-5261.htm, downloaded 12/15/1999.
  • Cyta's Telecommunications Hub in the Eastern Mediterranean

    Cyta's Telecommunications Hub in the Eastern Mediterranean

    CARRIER SERVICES Cyta’s Telecommunications Hub in the Eastern Mediterranean – a Telecommunications Corridor between Europe and the Middle East By Mr Christos Limnatitis, Manager, National and International Wholesale Market antennas, providing connectivity with major satellite systems such as Intelsat, Eutelsat, SES, Hylas, Thor, AsiaSat and Arabsat. Services offered range from satellite television on a permanent and occasional basis to international telephony, monitoring services, data and internet connectivity. The teleports also offer VSAT services, hosting services to third parties and serve as a video head-end for Cyta’s IPTV offering in the Cyprus market. Cytaglobal is particularly active in the area of international undersea fibre optic cables, providing wholesale products and services on a global basis. Taking advantage of the island’s strategic geographical position, Cytaglobal has developed an extensive undersea fibre optic cable network, which connects Cyprus with its neighbouring countries of Greece, Italy, Israel, Syria, Lebanon and Egypt and thereafter with the rest of the world. This cable network, uses state-of-the-art technology By Mr Christos Limnatitis, and full restoration and diversity and includes the following Manager, National and International Wholesale Market submarine fibre optic cable systems that land in Cyprus, at three separate Cytaglobal cable landing stations, namely yta, the leading telecommunications operator Ayia Napa, Pentaskhinos and Yeroskipos: in Cyprus, provides the full spectrum of ARIEL – a private cable subsystem consisting of a fibre Cadvanced telecommunication products and pair between Cyprus and Israel providing connectivity to services, covering fixed and mobile voice and data Israel and extending beyond to Western Europe through communications, Internet, IPTV, broadband and other existing networks.
  • Anchoring the African Internet Ecosystem

    Anchoring the African Internet Ecosystem

    Anchoring the African Internet Ecosystem Anchoring the African Internet Ecosystem: Lessons from Kenya and Nigeria’s Internet Exchange Point Growth By Michael Kende June 2020 CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 internetsociety.org 1 Anchoring the African Internet Ecosystem Table of contents 3 Executive summary 6 Background: A vision for Africa 8 Introduction: How to get there from here 13 Success stories: Kenya and Nigeria today 18 Results that stand the test of time 20 Change factors: Replicable steps toward measurable outcomes 27 Market gaps 29 Recommendations 33 Conclusions 34 Annex A: Kenya Internet Exchange Point 35 Annex B: Internet Exchange Point of Nigeria 36 Annex C: Acknowledgments 37 Annex D: Glossary of terms 38 Annex E: List of figures and tables CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 internetsociety.org 2 Anchoring the African Internet Ecosystem Executive summary In 2010, the Internet Society’s team in Africa set an The rapid pace of Internet ecosystem ambitious goal that 80% of African Internet traffic development in both Kenya and Nigeria since would be locally accessible by 2020. 2012 underscores the critical role that IXPs Internet Exchange Points (IXPs) are key to realizing and the accompanying infrastructure play in this goal in that they enable local traffic exchange and the establishment of strong and sustainable access to content. To document this role, in 2012, the Internet ecosystems. Internet Society commissioned a study to identify and quantify the significant benefits of two leading African This development produces significant day-to-day IXPs at the time: KIXP in Kenya and IXPN in Nigeria. value—the present COVID-19 crisis magnifies one such The Internet Society is pleased to publish this update benefit in the smooth accommodation of sudden of the original study.
  • In This Issue: 11 Years All Optical Submarine Network Upgrades Of

    In This Issue: 11 Years All Optical Submarine Network Upgrades Of

    66 n o v voice 2012 of the ISSn 1948-3031 Industry System Upgrades Edition In This Issue: 11 Years All Optical Submarine Network Upgrades of Upgrading Cables Systems? More Possibilities That You Originally Think Of! Excellence Reach, Reliability And Return On Investment: The 3R’s To Optimal Subsea Architecture Statistics Issue Issue Issue #64 Issue #3 #63 #2 Released Released Issue Released Released #65 Released 2 ISSN No. 1948-3031 PUBLISHER: Wayne Nielsen MANAGING EDITOR: Kevin G. Summers ovember in America is the month Forum brand which we will be rolling out we celebrate Thanksgiving. It during the course of the year, and which CONTRIBUTING WRITERS: Stewart Ash, is also the month SubTel Forum we believe will further enhance your James Barton, Bertrand Clesca, Dr Herve Fevrier, N Stephen Jarvis, Brian Lavallée, Pete LeHardy, celebrates our anniversary of existence, utility and enjoyment. We’re going to kick Vinay Rathore, Dr. Joerg Schwartz that now being 11 years going strong. it up a level or two, and think you will like the developments . And as always, it will Submarine Telecoms Forum magazine is When Ted and I established our little be done at no cost to our readers. published bimonthly by Submarine Telecoms magazine in 2001, our hope was to get Forum, Inc., and is an independent commercial enough interest to keep it going for a We will do so with two key founding publication, serving as a freely accessible forum for professionals in industries connected while. We had a list of contacts, an AOL principles always in mind, which annually with submarine optical fiber technologies and email address and a song in our heart; the I reaffirm to you, our readers: techniques.
  • Tds National Reports Itu Telecom World 2003 and Canton Ofgeneva Hosted by Therepublic

    Tds National Reports Itu Telecom World 2003 and Canton Ofgeneva Hosted by Therepublic

    2003 ORLD W ELECOM TDS NATIONAL REPORTS TDS NATIONAL International Telecommunication Union Place des Nations, CH-1211 Geneva 20, Switzerland Tel.: +41 22 730 6161 – Fax: +41 22 730 6444 E-mail: [email protected] TDS NATIONAL REPORTS TDS NATIONAL ITU T HOSTED BY THE REPUBLIC www.itu.int/itutelecom AND CANTON OF GENEVA TDS NATIONAL REPORTS The Republic and Canton of Geneva sponsors of the Telecom Development Symposium (TDS) Table of contents Page Page Albania ................................................. 1 Moldova................................................ 145 Angola .................................................. 5 Mongolia............................................... 147 Armenia................................................ 9 Myanmar .............................................. 155 Bangladesh .......................................... 11 Nepal .................................................... 159 Benin .................................................... 17 Nicaragua ............................................. 165 Bhutan.................................................. 21 Pakistan................................................ 167 Bosnia and Herzegovina ...................... 27 Papua New Guinea .............................. 179 Burkina Faso ........................................ 31 Paraguay .............................................. 183 Burundi................................................. 41 Cambodia............................................. 43 Peru ...................................................
  • Mapping the Information Environment in the Pacific Island Countries: Disruptors, Deficits, and Decisions

    Mapping the Information Environment in the Pacific Island Countries: Disruptors, Deficits, and Decisions

    December 2019 Mapping the Information Environment in the Pacific Island Countries: Disruptors, Deficits, and Decisions Lauren Dickey, Erica Downs, Andrew Taffer, and Heidi Holz with Drew Thompson, S. Bilal Hyder, Ryan Loomis, and Anthony Miller Maps and graphics created by Sue N. Mercer, Sharay Bennett, and Michele Deisbeck Approved for Public Release: distribution unlimited. IRM-2019-U-019755-Final Abstract This report provides a general map of the information environment of the Pacific Island Countries (PICs). The focus of the report is on the information environment—that is, the aggregate of individuals, organizations, and systems that shape public opinion through the dissemination of news and information—in the PICs. In this report, we provide a current understanding of how these countries and their respective populaces consume information. We map the general characteristics of the information environment in the region, highlighting trends that make the dissemination and consumption of information in the PICs particularly dynamic. We identify three factors that contribute to the dynamism of the regional information environment: disruptors, deficits, and domestic decisions. Collectively, these factors also create new opportunities for foreign actors to influence or shape the domestic information space in the PICs. This report concludes with recommendations for traditional partners and the PICs to support the positive evolution of the information environment. This document contains the best opinion of CNA at the time of issue. It does not necessarily represent the opinion of the sponsor or client. Distribution Approved for public release: distribution unlimited. 12/10/2019 Cooperative Agreement/Grant Award Number: SGECPD18CA0027. This project has been supported by funding from the U.S.
  • SUPPLY RECORD - REPEATERED SYSTEM ( 1 ) 1St Generation (Regenerator System Using 1.31 Micron Wavelength)

    SUPPLY RECORD - REPEATERED SYSTEM ( 1 ) 1St Generation (Regenerator System Using 1.31 Micron Wavelength)

    SUPPLY RECORD - REPEATERED SYSTEM ( 1 ) 1st Generation (Regenerator System using 1.31 micron wavelength) System Landing Countries Capacity Route Length Delivery Japan, U.S.A. (Guam, TPC-3 (Note 1) 560Mbps (280Mbps x 2fp) 3,760km Dec. 88 Hawaii) Hong Kong, Japan, Hong Kong-Japan-Korea 560Mbps (280Mbps x 2fp) 4,700km Apr. 90 Korea Kuantan-Kota Kinabaru Malaysia 840Mbps (420Mbps x 2fp) 1,570km Dec. 90 Japan, U.S.A. North Pacific Cable (NPC) 1680Mbps (420Mbps x 4fp) 9,400km Apr. 91 (Mainland) Surabaya-Banjarmasin Indonesia 280Mbps (280Mbps x 1fp) 410km Dec. 91 N. ote 1:The very first Branching Units deployed in the Pacific 1 SUPPLY RECORD - REPEATERED SYSTEM ( 2 ) 2nd Generation (Regenerator System using 1.55 micron wavelength) System Landing Sites Capacity Route Length Delivery UK-Germany No.5 (Note 2) UK, Germany 3.6Gbps (1.8Gbps x 2fp) 500km Oct. 91 Brunei-Singapore Brunei, Singapore 1120Mbps (560Mbps x 2fp) 1500km Nov. 91 Brunei, Malaysia, Brunei-Malaysia-Philippines (BMP) 1120Mbps (560Mbps x 2fp) 1500km Jan. 92 Philippines Japan, U.S.A. TPC-4 1680Mbps (560Mbps x 3fp) 5000km Oct. 92 (Mainland) Japan, Hong Kong, APC Taiwan, Malaysia, 1680Mbps (560Mbps x 3fp) 7600km Aug. 93 Singapore Malaysia-Thailand Malaysia, Thailand 1120Mbps (560Mbps x 2fp) 1500km Aug. 94 (incl. Petchaburi-Sri Racha) Russia-Japan-Korea (RJK) Russia, Japan, Korea 1120Mbps (560Mbps x 2fp) 1700km Nov. 94 Thailand, Vietnam, Thailand-Vietnam-Hong Kong (T-V-H) 1120Mbps (560Mbps x 2fp) 3400km Nov. 95 Hong Kong N. ote 2: The very first giga bit submarine cable system in the world 2 SUPPLY RECORD - REPEATERED SYSTEM ( 3 ) 3rd Generation (Optical Amplifier System) System Landing Sites Capacity Route Length Delivery Malaysia Domestic (Southern Link) Malaysia 10Gbps (5Gbps x 2fp) 2,300km Jul.
  • Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

    Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

    Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. In the Matter of EDGE CABLE HOLDINGS USA, LLC, File No. SCL-LIC-2020-____________ AQUA COMMS (AMERICAS) INC., AQUA COMMS (IRELAND) LIMITED, CABLE & WIRELESS AMERICAS SYSTEMS, INC., AND MICROSOFT INFRASTRUCTURE GROUP, LLC, Application for a License to Land and Operate a Private Fiber-Optic Submarine Cable System Connecting the United States, the United Kingdom, and France, to Be Known as THE AMITIÉ CABLE SYSTEM JOINT APPLICATION FOR CABLE LANDING LICENSE— STREAMLINED PROCESSING REQUESTED Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 34, Executive Order No. 10,530, and 47 C.F.R. § 1.767, Edge Cable Holdings USA, LLC (“Edge USA”), Aqua Comms (Americas) Inc. (“Aqua Comms Americas”), Aqua Comms (Ireland) Limited (“Aqua Comms Ireland,” together with Aqua Comms Americas, “Aqua Comms”), Cable & Wireless Americas Systems, Inc. (“CWAS”), and Microsoft Infrastructure Group, LLC (“Microsoft Infrastructure”) (collectively, the “Applicants”) hereby apply for a license to land and operate within U.S. territory the Amitié system, a private fiber-optic submarine cable network connecting the United States, the United Kingdom, and France. The Applicants and their affiliates will operate the Amitié system on a non-common-carrier basis, either by providing bulk capacity to wholesale and enterprise customers on particularized terms and conditions pursuant to individualized negotiations or by using the Amitié cable system to serve their own internal business connectivity needs. The existence of robust competition on U.S.-U.K., U.S.-France, and (more broadly) U.S.-Western Europe routes obviates any need for common-carrier regulation of the system on public-interest grounds.
  • Creating Trust in Critical Network Infrastructures: Korean Case Study

    Creating Trust in Critical Network Infrastructures: Korean Case Study

    INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION ITU WORKSHOP ON Document: CNI/05 CREATING TRUST IN CRITICAL 20 May 2002 NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURES Seoul, Republic of Korea — 20 - 22 May 2002 CREATING TRUST IN CRITICAL NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURES: KOREAN CASE STUDY Creating trust in critical network infrastructures: Korean case study This case study has been prepared by Dr. Chaeho Lim <[email protected]>. Dr Cho is Visiting Professor at the Korean Institute of Advanced Science & Technology, in the Infosec Education and Hacking, Virus Research Centre. This case study, Creating Trust in Critical Network Infrastructures: Korean Case Study, is part of a series of Telecommunication Case Studies produced under the New Initiatives programme of the Office of the Secretary General of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU). Other country case studies on Critical Network Infrastructures can be found at <http://www.itu.int/cni>. The opinions expressed in this study are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the International Telecommunication Union, its membership or the Korean Government. The author wishes to acknowledge Mr Chinyong Chong <[email protected]> of the Strategy and Policy Unit of ITU for contributions to the paper. The paper has been edited by the ITU secretariat. The author gratefully acknowledges the generous assistance of all those who have contributed information for this report. In particular, thanks are due to staff of Ministry of Information and Communication and Korean Information Security Agency for their help and suggestions. 2/27 Creating trust in critical network infrastructures: Korean case study TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive summary ......................................................................................................................................................... 4 1. Introduction.............................................................................................................................................................
  • Telecommunications Provider Locator

    Telecommunications Provider Locator

    Telecommunications Provider Locator Industry Analysis & Technology Division Wireline Competition Bureau March 2009 This report is available for reference in the FCC’s Information Center at 445 12th Street, S.W., Courtyard Level. Copies may be purchased by contacting Best Copy and Printing, Inc., Portals II, 445 12th Street S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554, telephone 800-378-3160, facsimile 202-488-5563, or via e-mail at [email protected]. This report can be downloaded and interactively searched on the Wireline Competition Bureau Statistical Reports Internet site located at www.fcc.gov/wcb/iatd/locator.html. Telecommunications Provider Locator This report lists the contact information, primary telecommunications business and service(s) offered by 6,252 telecommunications providers. The last report was released September 7, 2007.1 The information in this report is drawn from providers’ Telecommunications Reporting Worksheets (FCC Form 499-A). It can be used by customers to identify and locate telecommunications providers, by telecommunications providers to identify and locate others in the industry, and by equipment vendors to identify potential customers. Virtually all providers of telecommunications must file FCC Form 499-A each year.2 These forms are not filed with the FCC but rather with the Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC), which serves as the data collection agent. The pool of filers contained in this edition consists of companies that operated and collected revenue during 2006, as well as new companies that file the form to fulfill the Commission’s registration requirement.3 Information from filings received by USAC after October 16, 2007, and from filings that were incomplete has been excluded from this report.
  • KDDI Global ICT Brochure

    KDDI Global ICT Brochure

    https://global.kddi.com KDDI-Global Networks and IT Solutions Networking, Colocation, System Integration around the world BUILDING YOUR BUSINESS TOGETHER KDDI solutions are at the cutting-edge in all fields of information and communications KDDI, a Fortune Global 500 company, is one of Asia’s largest telecommunications providers, with approximately US$48 billion in annual revenue and a proven track record extending over many years and around the world. We deliver all-round services, from mobile phones to fixed-line communications, making us your one-stop solution provider for telecommunications and IT environments. The high praise and trust enjoyed by our TELEHOUSE data centers positioned around the world have kept us at the forefront of service and quality. Since our establishment in 1953, we have expanded our presence into 28 countries and 60 cities, with over 100 offices around the world supporting the success of our international customers through our high quality services. KDDI’s mobile telephone brand “au” has achieved significant market share in Japan, one of the world’s most comprehensive KDDI Quick Facts communications markets. KDDI’s relationship with over 600 carriers worldwide enables us to provide high-quality international network services in over 190 countries. Our exciting ventures, built on extensive experience, include investment in the “South-East Asia Japan 2 Cable”, which connects 11 locations in 9 countries and territories in Asia. Moreover, as the world moves toward the age of IoT and 5G, KDDI is taking steps to promote IoT business, such as connected cars, support for companies engaged in global business, and the creation of new value for our society.