Telecommunications Provider Locator

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Telecommunications Provider Locator Telecommunications Provider Locator Industry Analysis & Technology Division Wireline Competition Bureau March 2009 This report is available for reference in the FCC’s Information Center at 445 12th Street, S.W., Courtyard Level. Copies may be purchased by contacting Best Copy and Printing, Inc., Portals II, 445 12th Street S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554, telephone 800-378-3160, facsimile 202-488-5563, or via e-mail at [email protected]. This report can be downloaded and interactively searched on the Wireline Competition Bureau Statistical Reports Internet site located at www.fcc.gov/wcb/iatd/locator.html. Telecommunications Provider Locator This report lists the contact information, primary telecommunications business and service(s) offered by 6,252 telecommunications providers. The last report was released September 7, 2007.1 The information in this report is drawn from providers’ Telecommunications Reporting Worksheets (FCC Form 499-A). It can be used by customers to identify and locate telecommunications providers, by telecommunications providers to identify and locate others in the industry, and by equipment vendors to identify potential customers. Virtually all providers of telecommunications must file FCC Form 499-A each year.2 These forms are not filed with the FCC but rather with the Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC), which serves as the data collection agent. The pool of filers contained in this edition consists of companies that operated and collected revenue during 2006, as well as new companies that file the form to fulfill the Commission’s registration requirement.3 Information from filings received by USAC after October 16, 2007, and from filings that were incomplete has been excluded from this report. Although many telecommunications providers offer an extensive menu of services, each filer is asked on Line 105 of FCC Form 499-A to select the five categories that best describe its telecommunications business. Table 1 lists the categories from which the filer can choose and the number of filers that selected each. In some cases, filer selections were changed based on supplemental information. Within each category, Table 1 also notes how many filers can be characterized as “local / long distance” providers. We recognize that as providers increasingly are engaged in multiple lines of business, characterizing them as entities that provide one type of service may not fully reflect the nature of their business activities. We have identified filers that on a holding company level of aggregation provided substantial amounts of wireline local and long distance telephony. Holding companies were classified as local / long distance if each of these revenue categories represented more than 10% of their total end-user telecommunications billings, or if they reported at least $50 million in end-user revenue in each category. Wireless telecommunications providers, on the other hand, were included in the local / long distance category if, at the holding-company level, at 1 Industry Analysis and Technology Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, Telecommunications Provider Locator (rel. September 7, 2007). 2 There are certain exceptions. Providers that offer telecommunications for a fee exclusively on a non-common carrier basis are not required to file if their total annual contribution to universal service would be less than $10,000. Government entities that purchase telecommunications services in bulk on their own behalf, public safety and local government entities licensed under Subpart B of Part 90 of the Commission’s rules, entities providing interstate telecommunications exclusively to government or public safety entities, broadcasters and various non-profit entities are not required to file. Finally, systems integrators that derive less than 5% of their systems integration revenue from the resale of telecommunications and entities that provide services only to themselves or to commonly-owned affiliates need not file. 3 A telecommunications carrier intending to provide interstate telecommunications service can fulfill its registration requirement by filing pages 1, 2, 3, and 8 of FCC Form 499-A with the data collection agent (see 47 C.F.R. § 64.1195). 1 least 10% of end-user telecommunications revenue was interstate. Because of the way their revenue was reported, we were unable to determine which payphone, satellite, prepaid card and operator service affiliates fell into the local / long distance category. Note that a local / long distance designation holds no implications about the way a filer sells telecommunications services. That is, a filer categorized as a local / long distance provider may have many local-only and long distance-only customers, as well as customers taking local and long distance as a bundle. Comparisons of the number of filers in Table 1 over time would not be meaningful due to changes to the Commission’s rules regarding the filing of FCC Form 499-A. Originally, a FCC Form 499- A filing was required from each and every legal entity providing interstate telecommunications for a fee. An exception allowing consolidated filing was adopted in early 2002.4 It is now permissible, under certain conditions, for telecommunications providers to file summary worksheets that cover related legal entities. The current report includes 48 consolidated filings, covering 581 individual legal entities. Therefore, changes in the number of filers over time can be attributed to consolidated filing as well as other factors.5 Table 2 shows the number of filers that reported revenue in each of ten broad service categories. Generally, revenue is from services provided to other carriers for resale (i.e., carrier’s carrier) and/or directly to end users. In each of these two broad categories, filers can derive revenue from the following specific services: local, mobile, payphone, operator services and prepaid calling cards, and/or other toll services. Since many filers report revenue from the provision of more than one service, the sum of the number of filers by service type in Table 2 is greater than the number of individual filers. Table 2 also shows the number of filers that contribute a portion of their interstate end-user revenue to maintain universal service. Most telecommunications providers are required to contribute to the universal service fund, but there are exceptions. Section 54.706 of the Commission’s rules requires all telecommunications carriers providing interstate telecommunications services, providers of interstate telecommunications that offer interstate telecommunications for a fee on a non-common carrier basis, and payphone providers that are aggregators to contribute to universal service. The primary reason that only 2,727 of the 6,252 filers actually contribute to the universal service fund is that no contribution is required if a filer’s 4 See Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, 1998 Biennial Regulatory Review – Streamlined Contributor Reporting Requirements Associated with Administration of Telecommunications Relay Service, North American Numbering Plan, Local Number Portability, and Universal Service Support Mechanisms, Telecommunications Services for Individuals with Hearing and Speech Disabilities, and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Administration of the North American Numbering Plan and North American Numbering Plan Cost Recovery Contribution Factor and Fund Size, Number Resource Optimization, Telephone Number Portability, Truth-in-Billing and Billing Format, CC Docket Nos. 96-45, 98-171, 90-571, 92-237, 99-200, 95-116, 98-170, Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Report and Order, 17 FCC Rcd 3752 (rel. Feb. 26, 2002). 5 The numbers of local and toll service providers reporting revenue on FCC Form 499-A are tracked over time in Tables 8.7 and 9.4, respectively, of the most recent Trends in Telephone Service report (Trends) (rel. August 28, 2008). It is vital to note that the numbers of providers shown in Table 1 of this report will not match the numbers reported in Trends. In addition to current providers, this report includes the contact information of new providers that filed FCC Form 499-A anytime to fulfill their registration requirement (see 47 C.F.R. § 64.1195). Since these new providers generally have no revenue to report, they are excluded from the tabulations reported in Trends. 2 total annual contribution would be less than $10,000. While many telecommunications providers do not contribute to universal service for this reason, they are generally required to support numbering administration, local number portability, and telecommunications relay services.6 In addition, Table 2 indicates whether filers are active or inactive. Again, the universe of FCC Form 499-A filers includes not only those entities that provided telecommunications during the year 2006, but also new companies fulfilling their registration requirement.7 Of those filers that declared some revenue in 2006, those not known to have merged, declared bankruptcy, or ceased operation for some other reason by October 16, 2007 are listed as active. Newly registered filers are also listed as active, although they generally have no revenue to report. Table 3 lists 6,252 FCC Form 499-A filers alphabetically by legal name. For each filer, Table 3 shows contact information including legal name, address of corporate headquarters, telephone number for customer inquiries, principal communications business, and holding company.8 This table also shows
Recommended publications
  • BROADBAND PROPERTIES | | July 2008 That Handles Mainly Carrier Ethernet Has Home Architecture for Verizon’S Fios
    Broadband 2 0TOP Properties 0 www.bbpmag.com 8100 This year’s listing shows new emphasis on companies that sell equipment and software for network monitoring, provisioning, and customer service. A BBP Staff Report his year’s Top 100 continues a tive business plans and technology Prysmian – a major fiber and copper ca- trend from last year, with growth configurations. ble vendor worldwide (it was spun out of Tin the number of awardees on the • Helping others deploy networks, by Pirelli) was expanding its fiber business network management side of the busi- supplying key hardware, software, here, selling such products as its blown ness. Most exciting: billing and network design services, construction services fiber and massive fiber ribbon cables. monitoring software that can seamlessly and so forth. But it had been making a bigger FTTx handle the triple play and a whole lot • Introducing innovative technolo- impact in the US only since 2006. It more. This year’s listing also rewards gies, even if the technologies have didn’t make the Top 100 last year, but suppliers of fiber and systems for both not been commercially deployed at was an easy call this time. inside and outside plant – a new class of the time the list is compiled. We’re Corporate form and overall organi- equipment made possible by bend-tol- always on the lookout for technolo- zational size are not important. Non- erant fiber – and developers of entirely gies that change the rules – by re- profit entities such as municipal fiber new PON technologies. ducing early deployment costs, for network operators are eligible.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2016
    SoftBank Group Corp. ANNUAL REPORT 2016 Corporate Philosophy Information Revolution – Happiness for everyone Vision The corporate group needed most by people around the world SoftBank Group Corp. ANNUAL REPORT 2016 001 A History of Challenges A History of Challenges The view is different when you challenge yourself Continuing to take on new challenges and embrace change without fear. Driving business forward through exhaustive debate. This is the SoftBank Group’s DNA. SoftBank Group Corp. ANNUAL REPORT 2016 002 A History of Challenges Established SoftBank Japan. 1981 Commenced operations as a distributor of packaged software. 1982 Entered the publishing business. Launched Oh! PC and Oh! MZ, monthly magazines introducing PCs and software by manufacturer. 1994 Acquired events division from Ziff Communications Company of the U.S. through SoftBank Holdings Inc. 1996 Acquired Ziff-Davis Publishing Company, U.S. publisher of PC WEEK magazine and provider of leading-edge information on the PC industry. SoftBank Group Corp. ANNUAL REPORT 2016 003 A History of Challenges Established Yahoo Japan through joint investment with Yahoo! Inc. in the U.S. 1996 Began to develop into an Internet company at full scale. Yahoo Japan Net income* 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 FY (Note) Accounting standard: JGAAP up to fiscal 2012; IFRSs from fiscal 2013 onward. * Net income attributable to owners of the parent. SoftBank Group Corp. ANNUAL REPORT 2016 004 A History of Challenges Made full-scale entry into the telecommunications business. 2000s Contributed to faster, more affordable telecommunications services in Japan.
    [Show full text]
  • HNI Entity 310-010 Verizon Wireless 310-012 Verizon
    HNI Entity 310-010 Verizon Wireless 310-012 Verizon Wireless 310-013 Verizon Wireless 310-014 TEST IMSI HNI 310-016 Cricket Communications 310-020 Union Telephone Company 310-030 AT&T Mobility 310-035 ETEX Communications, LP (d/b/a) ETEX Wireless 310-050 Alaska Communications 310-060 Consolidated Telcom 310-070 AT&T Mobility 310-080 AT&T Mobility 310-090 Cricket Communications, LLC 310-100 New Mexico RSA 4 East Limited Partnership 310-110 Pacific Telecom Inc. 310-120 SPRINTCOM, INC. 310-130 Carolina West Wireless 310-140 GTA Wireless LLC 310-150 AT&T Mobility 310-160 T-Mobile USA 310-170 AT&T Mobility 310-180 West Central Wireless 310-190 Alaska Wireless Communications, LLC 310-200 T-Mobile USA 310-210 T-Mobile USA 310-220 T-Mobile USA 310-230 T-Mobile USA 310-240 T-Mobile USA 310-250 T-Mobile USA 310-260 T-Mobile USA 310-270 T-Mobile USA 310-280 AT&T Mobility 310-290 NEP Cellcorp, Inc. 310-300 Blanca Telephone Company 310-310 T-Mobile USA 310-320 Smith Bagley, Inc. dba CellularOne 310-330 Wireless Partners LLC 310-340 Limitless Mobile, LLC 310-350 Verizon Wireless 310-360 Cellular Network Partnership dba Pioneer Cellular 310-370 Docomo Pacific, Inc. 310-380 AT&T Mobility 310-390 TX-11 Acquisition, LLC 310-400 Wave Runner LLC 310-410 AT&T Mobility 310-420 Cincinnati Bell Wireless, LLC 310-430 GCI Communications Corp 310-440 Numerex Corp 310-450 North East Cellular Inc. 310-460 Newcore Wireless 310-470 Sprint 310-480 Wave Runner LLC 310-490 T-Mobile USA 310-500 Public Service Cellular, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Issued BL 11192018 by DATE
    2018 Issued Tukwila Business Licenses Sorted by Date of Application DBA Name Full Name Full Primary Address UBC # NAICS Creation NAICS Description Code Date TROYS ELECTRIC EDWARDS TROY A 2308 S L ST 602712157 238210 11/13/2018 Electrical Contractors TACOMA WA 98405 and Oth OLD MACK LLC OLD MACK LLC 2063 RYAN RD 604216260 423320 11/13/2018 Brick, Stone, and BUCKLEY WA 98321 Related Cons DRAGONS BREATH CREAMERY NITRO SNACK LLC 1027 SOUTHCENTER MALL 604290130 445299 11/9/2018 All Other Specialty Food TUKWILA WA 98188 Store NASH ELECTRIC LLC NASH ELECTRIC LLC 8316 71ST ST NE 603493097 238210 11/8/2018 Electrical Contractors MARYSVILLE WA 98270 and Oth BUDGET WIRING BUDGET WIRING 12612 23RD AVE S 601322435 238210 11/7/2018 Electrical Contractors BURIEN WA 98168 and Oth MATRIX ELECTRIC LLC MATRIX ELECTRIC LLC 15419 24TH AVE E 603032786 238210 11/7/2018 Electrical Contractors TACOMA WA 98445-4711 and Oth SOUNDBUILT HOMES LLC SOUNDBUILT HOMES LLC 12815 CANYON RD E 602883361 236115 11/7/2018 General Contractor M PUYALLUP WA 98373 1ST FIRE SOLUTIONS LLC 1ST FIRE SOLUTIONS LLC 4210 AUBURN WAY N 603380886 238220 11/6/2018 Plumbing, Heating, and 7 Air-Con AUBURN WA 98002 BJ'S CONSTRUCTION & BJ'S CONSTRUCTION & 609 26TH ST SE 601930579 236115 11/6/2018 General Contractor LANDSCAPING LANDSCAPING AUBURN WA 98002 CONSTRUCTION BROKERS INC CONSTRUCTION BROKERS INC 3500 DR GREAVES RD 604200594 236115 11/6/2018 General Contractor GRANDVIEW MO 64030 OBEC CONSULTING ENGINEERS OBEC CONSULTING ENGINEERS 4041 B ST 604305691 541330 11/6/2018 Engineering Services
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific Limited Repor T
    PACIFIC LIMITED REPORT "The FRRS has established a reputation for the best run and most efficient photo run-by operations ever seen by the UP's steam crew." "I would not hesitate to recommend our group of supervioors to anyone planning an excursion, particularly if our car attendants and support people are included." "The "can-do" reputation of the FRRS has been maintained." !'The FRRS again demonstrated its capability of handling a large undertaking. The record will show that the FRRS was more than up to its share of the task." passengers, and distance from any sid­ We Did It Again! Pacific Limited Photo ings and absolute signals, then Vic's and Wayne's own criteria for proper ... and Thank You Run-8ys sunlight angle, for giving everyone a by Steve Habeck (Roto Fun-Bys) clear shot of the train, and for better FRRS Crew Supervisor By Wayne Monger than average elements of photo compo­ sition, the site was then marked by the The four legs of the Pacific Limited The chore that Vic Neves and now famous yellow tape across the Steam ExcurSion sponsored by the Wayne Monger faced for the Pacific ground for the actual photo line. Once FRRS; Limited was to duplicate the success the sites were properly prepared and from the 1991 steam excursions of the scheduled for stops, the on-board FRRS eJuly 16, 1992 Winnemucca to Portola set up and operation of the photo run- crews were briefed as to the physical eJuly 18, 1992 Portola to Sacramento bys. Thanks to the efforts of many aspects of each site.
    [Show full text]
  • 3825 J. Schnizlein Category: Standards Track M
    Network Working Group J. Polk Request for Comments: 3825 J. Schnizlein Category: Standards Track M. Linsner Cisco Systems July 2004 Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol Option for Coordinate-based Location Configuration Information Status of this Memo This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. Copyright Notice Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2004). Abstract This document specifies a Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol Option for the coordinate-based geographic location of the client. The Location Configuration Information (LCI) includes latitude, longitude, and altitude, with resolution indicators for each. The reference datum for these values is also included. Polk, et al. Standards Track [Page 1] RFC 3825 DHCP Option for Coordinate LCI July 2004 Table of Contents 1. Introduction . 2 1.1. Conventions . 3 1.2. Motivation . 3 1.3. Rationale . 4 2. Location Configuration Information (LCI) Elements. 4 2.1. Elements of the Location Configuration Information . 5 3. Security Considerations. 8 4. IANA Considerations. 8 5. Acknowledgements . 9 Appendix Calculations of Imprecision possible with the DHC LCI . 10 A.1. LCI of "White House" (Example 1) . 10 A.2. LCI of "Sears Tower" (Example 2) . 12 6. References . 13 6.1. Normative References . 13 6.2. Informational References . 14 7. Author Information . 14 8. Full Copyright Statement . 15 1. Introduction This document specifies a Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol [1] Option for the coordinate-based geographic location of the client, to be provided by the server.
    [Show full text]
  • Telecommunications Provider Locator
    Telecommunications Provider Locator Industry Analysis & Technology Division Wireline Competition Bureau February 2003 This report is available for reference in the FCC’s Information Center at 445 12th Street, S.W., Courtyard Level. Copies may be purchased by calling Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street SW, Room CY- B402, Washington, D.C. 20554, telephone 202-863-2893, facsimile 202-863-2898, or via e-mail [email protected]. This report can be downloaded and interactively searched on the FCC-State Link Internet site at www.fcc.gov/wcb/iatd/locator.html. Telecommunications Provider Locator This report lists the contact information and the types of services sold by 5,364 telecommunications providers. The last report was released November 27, 2001.1 All information in this report is drawn from providers’ April 1, 2002, filing of the Telecommunications Reporting Worksheet (FCC Form 499-A).2 This report can be used by customers to identify and locate telecommunications providers, by telecommunications providers to identify and locate others in the industry, and by equipment vendors to identify potential customers. Virtually all providers of telecommunications must file FCC Form 499-A each year.3 These forms are not filed with the FCC but rather with the Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC), which serves as the data collection agent. Information from filings received after November 22, 2002, and from filings that were incomplete has been excluded from the tables. Although many telecommunications providers offer an extensive menu of services, each filer is asked on Line 105 of FCC Form 499-A to select the single category that best describes its telecommunications business.
    [Show full text]
  • Promise Beheld and the Limits of Place
    Promise Beheld and the Limits of Place A Historic Resource Study of Carlsbad Caverns and Guadalupe Mountains National Parks and the Surrounding Areas By Hal K. Rothman Daniel Holder, Research Associate National Park Service, Southwest Regional Office Series Number Acknowledgments This book would not be possible without the full cooperation of the men and women working for the National Park Service, starting with the superintendents of the two parks, Frank Deckert at Carlsbad Caverns National Park and Larry Henderson at Guadalupe Mountains National Park. One of the true joys of writing about the park system is meeting the professionals who interpret, protect and preserve the nation’s treasures. Just as important are the librarians, archivists and researchers who assisted us at libraries in several states. There are too many to mention individuals, so all we can say is thank you to all those people who guided us through the catalogs, pulled books and documents for us, and filed them back away after we left. One individual who deserves special mention is Jed Howard of Carlsbad, who provided local insight into the area’s national parks. Through his position with the Southeastern New Mexico Historical Society, he supplied many of the photographs in this book. We sincerely appreciate all of his help. And finally, this book is the product of many sacrifices on the part of our families. This book is dedicated to LauraLee and Lucille, who gave us the time to write it, and Talia, Brent, and Megan, who provide the reasons for writing. Hal Rothman Dan Holder September 1998 i Executive Summary Located on the great Permian Uplift, the Guadalupe Mountains and Carlsbad Caverns national parks area is rich in prehistory and history.
    [Show full text]
  • Train Sheet #71 January/February 1995
    The @@ Preserving "The Feather River Ro ute " ... news from The Feather River Rail Societl/ and The Portola Railroad Museum Issue No. 71 January/February 1995 Cahoose WP 614 Looks Creat With Its New Paint Joh! WP Caboose 6Jl+ is shown on the M~seum grounds looking striking in its new silver and orange paint scheme! These cabooses were nicknamed "Canyon Cabooses" since the extended ends helped protect the crews from wind. rain and snow while standing on the back platform. Although it is over 5Tyears old {built in 1937-retired sometime after June 1953). our caboose still retains its original handrails. bunks. toilet and wood burning stove! After mounting on a new set of Andrews leaf spring trucks and repairs to the roof. WP 61'1 will hopefully be back on her feet again this summer! Caption by John S. Walker. Photo by Ed Warren. Inside this Issue: • Report of Starting 44-ton Locomotive. • Notice of FRRS Operating Crew Training. • Announcement of Upcoming 805-A Re-dedication Ceremony. Jan ./Feb. 1995 Issue No. 7 1 As the Society begins preparations for our 11 th operating season, those of us here in the immediate vicinity of the Museum must mentally "shift gears," writing and thinking ahead toward longer days and warmer weather that will eventually come. This issue of the Train Sheet brings news and information of Significant events scheduled to take place at the Museum In April and May, conjuring up thoughts of springtime and increasing visitor counts, while outside it's still all too February-ish, snow Feather River deepening by the hour.
    [Show full text]
  • WP's Bicentennial Locomotives
    The @@ Preserving "The Feather River Route" ... news from The Feather River Rail Societl/ and The Portola Railroad Museum Issue No. 76 November/December 1995 WP's Bicentennial Locomotives Western 'Pacific Bicentennial Locomotive 1776 is shown leading an eastbound at West Keddie Wye in july of 1979. 'Photo by Ed Warren. Inside this Issue: • Report on the Santa Trains. • Acquisition of two WP GP9's. • Stoty of WP's Bicentennial Locomotives. Nov./Dec. 1995 Issue No. 76 The winter season has arrived in Portola and the Sierra. and it blew in with high winds and heavy rain/snow all across Northern California. I have heard of several members who were dealt a serious blow by this storm. and I sympathize with you. Fortunately. the Museum came through with Feather River virtually no damage. although we had locomotive stack caps scattered all through the yard. With the annual Santa Trains behind us. things have been pretty well Rail Society put away for the winter. All but two of the locomotives are drained. with ********************** stacks capped. and all engines with batteries have been spotted near the Portola Railroad shop to facilitate keeping the batteries charged. The winter project for this year is upgrading the water system to the restrooms. along with expanding Museum the gas supply system for the Beanery to provide gas for heating the gift Preserving shop. office. and ladies' restroom. With day-to-day activity at the Museum winding down somewhat. I am ff ~g-~~.f7Iouk' working with the Directors to address several long-standing issues that P.O. Box 608 have been the concern of many members for some time.
    [Show full text]
  • THE HISTORY of ONLINE SEARCHING by Matt Hannigan
    AT A LONG STRANGE TRIP IT'S BEEN: THE HISTORY OF ONLINE SEARCHING by Matt Hannigan, lndianapolis-Mmion Cotm[Y Public Library N THE BEGINNING You can't miss the timeline that runs through this article. What I find remarkable is how fast all of this When the editor asked me to write this stuff occurred. I sometimes feel like one of those history of the last twenty years of cartoon characters who is left standing in his union suit searching it wasn't because I'm the senior statesperson after being whirled about in the dust of the Road of online in Indiana. That title rightly belongs to Ann Runner or Speedy Gonzalez. Van Camp (formerly of the IU Medical Library, now an independent searcher). Nor am I the intellectual When I first started my career in libraries back in backbone of Indiana's online community. That honor 1978, a young scholar would drive to the library, find a goes to Becki Whitaker of the Indiana Cooperative parking space, locate the proper division, find a Library Services Authority (INCOLSA) . Becki is online's periodical index, guess at a subject and finally identify nearest approximation to Star Trek's Mr. Speck. My and locate an article on the history of the Punic War. role has been more like that of Forrest Gump or Jar Jar These days the same young student jumps out of bed, Binks - I just happened to be along for the ride. Arid logs onto the Net, types some keywords into an EBSCO what a ride it has been! One can picture future Carl database - and in a few moments is reading an article Sagans and Jacob Bronowskis speaking of this era and on the history of MTV.
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons from Enron Thomas G
    Pepperdine Law Review Volume 32 Issue 2 Symposium: Can the Ordinary Practice of Law Article 15 Be a Religious Calling? 1-20-2005 The Lawyer as Truth-Teller: Lessons from Enron Thomas G. Bost Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/plr Part of the Corporation and Enterprise Law Commons, Ethics and Professional Responsibility Commons, and the Legal Profession Commons Recommended Citation Thomas G. Bost The Lawyer as Truth-Teller: Lessons from Enron, 32 Pepp. L. Rev. 2 (2005) Available at: http://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/plr/vol32/iss2/15 This Symposium is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at Pepperdine Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Pepperdine Law Review by an authorized administrator of Pepperdine Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Lawyer as Truth-Teller: Lessons From Enron Thomas G. Bost* I. THE "CODE" The teaching and practice of law assume and are shaped by, in Joseph Allegretti's words, the "standard vision" of lawyer conduct and ethical responsibility.' Under the standard vision, which is reflected in the various codes of professional responsibility governing lawyers, the lawyer is a "neutral partisan" for his or her client: "neutral" in that he does not let his moral values affect his actions on behalf of his client; "partisan" in that she does whatever she can within the limits of the law to advance her client's stated interests. Because the standard vision is readily understood by most lawyers as imposing a code of conduct upon them in their practice of law, Allegretti calls the standard vision the "Code.",2 Although the Code is not codified per se, it is reflected in the Constitution, with its guarantees of trial by jury and assistance of legal counsel, in our judicial system, which is primarily adversarial rather than inquisitorial, and in the various codes of ethics governing lawyer behavior.
    [Show full text]