The Baseline Structure of the Enteric Nervous System and Its Role in Parkinson’S Disease
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Birthdating of Myenteric Neuron Subtypes in the Small Intestine of the Mouse
RESEARCH ARTICLE Birthdating of Myenteric Neuron Subtypes in the Small Intestine of the Mouse Annette J. Bergner,1 Lincon A. Stamp,1 David G. Gonsalvez,1 Margaret B. Allison,2,3 David P. Olson,4 Martin G. Myers Jr,2,3,5 Colin R. Anderson,1 and Heather M. Young1* 1Department of Anatomy & Neuroscience, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia 2Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA 3Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA 4Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA 5Department of Neuroscience Graduate Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA ABSTRACT vast majority of myenteric neurons had exited the cell There are many different types of enteric neurons. Pre- cycle by P10. We did not observe any EdU1/NOS11 vious studies have identified the time at which some myenteric neurons in the small intestine of adult mice enteric neuron subtypes are born (exit the cell cycle) in following EdU injection at E10.5 or E11.5, which was the mouse, but the birthdates of some major enteric unexpected, as previous studies have shown that NOS1 neuron subtypes are still incompletely characterized or neurons are present in E11.5 mice. Studies using the unknown. We combined 5-ethynynl-20-deoxyuridine proliferation marker Ki67 revealed that very few NOS1 (EdU) labeling with antibody markers that identify myen- neurons in the E11.5 and E12.5 gut were proliferating. teric neuron subtypes to determine when neuron sub- However, Cre-lox-based genetic fate-mapping revealed types are born in the mouse small intestine. -
Behavioral Neuroscience Uab Graduate Handbook
Behavioral Neuroscience Ph.D. Program Policies, Guidelines, & Procedures Student Handbook 2021-2022 University of Alabama at Birmingham Table of Contents Mission Statement __________________________________________ 3 History of the Program _______________________________________ 3 Policies and Procedures ______________________________________ 4 Overview of Student Career ___________________________________ 5 Typical Courses ____________________________________________ 5 Progress Reports ___________________________________________ 6 2nd Year Research Project __________________________________ 7 Qualifying Examination _______________________________________ 8 Dissertation ________________________________________________ 10 Behavioral Neuroscience Student Checklist _______________________ 13 Master’s Degree ____________________________________________ 15 Policies Regarding Adequate Progress __________________________ 16 Policies on Remunerated Activities _____________________________ 16 Vacation, Leave, Holiday Guidelines ____________________________ 17 Degree Requirements and Associated Procedures ________________ 18 2 BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE PROGRAM Mission Statement and History of the Program Mission Statement Behavioral neuroscience is represented by scientists with interests in the physiological and neural substrates of behavior. The mission of the Behavioral Neuroscience Ph.D. program is to produce outstanding young scientists capable of pursuing independent research careers in the field of behavioral neuroscience by providing graduate -
The Creation of Neuroscience
The Creation of Neuroscience The Society for Neuroscience and the Quest for Disciplinary Unity 1969-1995 Introduction rom the molecular biology of a single neuron to the breathtakingly complex circuitry of the entire human nervous system, our understanding of the brain and how it works has undergone radical F changes over the past century. These advances have brought us tantalizingly closer to genu- inely mechanistic and scientifically rigorous explanations of how the brain’s roughly 100 billion neurons, interacting through trillions of synaptic connections, function both as single units and as larger ensem- bles. The professional field of neuroscience, in keeping pace with these important scientific develop- ments, has dramatically reshaped the organization of biological sciences across the globe over the last 50 years. Much like physics during its dominant era in the 1950s and 1960s, neuroscience has become the leading scientific discipline with regard to funding, numbers of scientists, and numbers of trainees. Furthermore, neuroscience as fact, explanation, and myth has just as dramatically redrawn our cultural landscape and redefined how Western popular culture understands who we are as individuals. In the 1950s, especially in the United States, Freud and his successors stood at the center of all cultural expla- nations for psychological suffering. In the new millennium, we perceive such suffering as erupting no longer from a repressed unconscious but, instead, from a pathophysiology rooted in and caused by brain abnormalities and dysfunctions. Indeed, the normal as well as the pathological have become thoroughly neurobiological in the last several decades. In the process, entirely new vistas have opened up in fields ranging from neuroeconomics and neurophilosophy to consumer products, as exemplified by an entire line of soft drinks advertised as offering “neuro” benefits. -
A Revised Computational Neuroanatomy for Motor Control
This is the author’s final version; this article has been accepted for publication in the Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1 A Revised Computational Neuroanatomy for Motor Control 2 Shlomi Haar1, Opher Donchin2,3 3 1. Department of BioEngineering, Imperial College London, UK 4 2. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel 5 3. Zlotowski Center for Neuroscience, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel 6 7 Corresponding author: Shlomi Haar ([email protected]) 8 Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK 9 10 Acknowledgements: We would like to thank Ilan Dinstein, Liad Mudrik, Daniel Glaser, Alex Gail, and 11 Reza Shadmehr for helpful discussions about the manuscript. Shlomi Haar is supported by the Royal 12 Society – Kohn International Fellowship (NF170650). Work on this review was partially supported by 13 DFG grant TI-239/16-1. 14 15 Abstract 16 We discuss a new framework for understanding the structure of motor control. Our approach 17 integrates existing models of motor control with the reality of hierarchical cortical processing and the 18 parallel segregated loops that characterize cortical-subcortical connections. We also incorporate the recent 19 claim that cortex functions via predictive representation and optimal information utilization. Our 20 framework assumes each cortical area engaged in motor control generates a predictive model of a different 21 aspect of motor behavior. In maintaining these predictive models, each area interacts with a different part 22 of the cerebellum and basal ganglia. These subcortical areas are thus engaged in domain appropriate 23 system identification and optimization. This refocuses the question of division of function among different 24 cortical areas. -
Genetic Modulation of GABA Levels in the Anterior Cingulate Cortex by GAD1 and COMT
Neuropsychopharmacology (2010) 35, 1708–1717 & 2010 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 0893-133X/10 $32.00 www.neuropsychopharmacology.org Genetic Modulation of GABA Levels in the Anterior Cingulate Cortex by GAD1 and COMT 1,2 1,2 3 1,2 Stefano Marenco* , Antonina A Savostyanova , Jan Willem van der Veen , Matthew Geramita , 1,2 1,2 1 1,2 1 Alexa Stern , Alan S Barnett , Bhaskar Kolachana , Eugenia Radulescu , Fengyu Zhang , 1 1 3 1 Joseph H Callicott , Richard E Straub , Jun Shen and Daniel R Weinberger 1 2 Clinical Brain Disorders Branch, GCAP, IRP, NIMH, Bethesda, MD, USA; Unit for Multimodal Imaging Genetics, Clinical Brain Disorders Branch, 3 GCAP, IRP, NIMH, Bethesda, MD, USA; Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Unit, MAP, IRP, NIMH, Bethesda, MD, USA g-Aminobutyric acid (GABA)-ergic transmission is critical for normal cortical function and is likely abnormal in a variety of neuropsychiatric disorders. We tested the in vivo effects of variations in two genes implicated in GABA function on GABA concentrations in prefrontal cortex of living subjects: glutamic acid decarboxylase 1 (GAD1), which encodes GAD67, and catechol-o-methyltransferase (COMT), which regulates synaptic dopamine in the cortex. We studied six single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in GAD1 previously associated with risk for schizophrenia or cognitive dysfunction and the val158met polymorphism in COMT in 116 healthy volunteers using proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Two of the GAD1 SNPs (rs1978340 (p ¼ 0.005) and rs769390 (p ¼ 0.004)) showed effects on GABA levels as did COMT val158met (p ¼ 0.04). We then tested three SNPs in GAD1 (rs1978340, rs11542313, and rs769390) for interaction with COMT val158met based on previous clinical results. -
Distance Learning Program Anatomy of the Human Brain/Sheep Brain Dissection
Distance Learning Program Anatomy of the Human Brain/Sheep Brain Dissection This guide is for middle and high school students participating in AIMS Anatomy of the Human Brain and Sheep Brain Dissections. Programs will be presented by an AIMS Anatomy Specialist. In this activity students will become more familiar with the anatomical structures of the human brain by observing, studying, and examining human specimens. The primary focus is on the anatomy, function, and pathology. Those students participating in Sheep Brain Dissections will have the opportunity to dissect and compare anatomical structures. At the end of this document, you will find anatomical diagrams, vocabulary review, and pre/post tests for your students. The following topics will be covered: 1. The neurons and supporting cells of the nervous system 2. Organization of the nervous system (the central and peripheral nervous systems) 4. Protective coverings of the brain 5. Brain Anatomy, including cerebral hemispheres, cerebellum and brain stem 6. Spinal Cord Anatomy 7. Cranial and spinal nerves Objectives: The student will be able to: 1. Define the selected terms associated with the human brain and spinal cord; 2. Identify the protective structures of the brain; 3. Identify the four lobes of the brain; 4. Explain the correlation between brain surface area, structure and brain function. 5. Discuss common neurological disorders and treatments. 6. Describe the effects of drug and alcohol on the brain. 7. Correctly label a diagram of the human brain National Science Education -
Identification of Neuronal Subpopulations That Project From
Identification of neuronal subpopulations that project from hypothalamus to both liver and adipose tissue polysynaptically Sarah Stanleya,1, Shirly Pintoa,b,1, Jeremy Segala,c, Cristian A. Péreza, Agnes Vialea,d, Jeff DeFalcoa,e, XiaoLi Caia, Lora K. Heislerf, and Jeffrey M. Friedmana,g,2 aLaboratory of Molecular Genetics, Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065; bMerck Research Laboratories, Rahway, NJ 07065; cDepartment of Pathology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065; dGenomics Core Laboratory, Memorial Sloan Kettering Hospital, New York, NY 10065; eRenovis, San Fransisco, CA 94080; fDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1PD United Kingdom; and gHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065 Contributed by Jeffrey M. Friedman, March 4, 2010 (sent for review January 6, 2010) The autonomic nervous system regulates fuel availability and of the solitary tract (NTS) (6) all modulate metabolic activity in energy storage in the liver, adipose tissue, and other organs; how- liver and white fat. Neuronal tracing studies confirm these areas, ever, the molecular components of this neural circuit are poorly and other studies innervate peripheral organs involved in car- understood. We sought to identify neural populations that project bohydrate and lipid metabolism (7–9). However, little is known from the CNS indirectly through multisynaptic pathways to liver of the site, organization, or connectivity of the CNS neural pop- and epididymal white fat in mice using pseudorabies -
Secretin-Induced Gastric Relaxation Is Mediated by Vasoactive Intestinal Polypeptide and Prostaglandin Pathways
Neurogastroenterol Motil (2009) 21, 754–e47 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2009.01271.x Secretin-induced gastric relaxation is mediated by vasoactive intestinal polypeptide and prostaglandin pathways Y. LU & C. OWYANG Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA Abstract Secretin has been shown to delay gastric vagally mediated pathway. Through nicotinic emptying and inhibit gastric motility. We have dem- synapses, secretin stimulates VIP release from post- onstrated that secretin acts on the afferent vagal ganglionic neurons in the gastric myenteric plexus, pathway to induce gastric relaxation in the rat. How- which in turn induces gastric relaxation through a ever, the efferent pathway that mediates the action of prostaglandin-dependent pathway. secretin on gastric motility remains unknown. We Keywords gastric relaxation, indomethacin, vagus recorded the response of intragastric pressure to graded nerve. doses of secretin administered intravenously to anaesthetized rats using a balloon attached to a cath- eter and placed in the body of the stomach. Secretin INTRODUCTION evoked a dose-dependent decrease in intragastric Secretin has been shown to inhibit gastric contrac- pressure. The threshold dose of secretin was 1.4 pmol tions and delay gastric emptying of liquids and kg)1 h)1 and the effective dose, 50% was 5.6 pmol kg)1 solids.1–3 However, the mechanisms of secretinÕs h)1. Pretreatment with hexamethonium markedly inhibitory effects on gastric motility remain unclear. reduced gastric relaxation induced by secretin The gene expression of secretin receptor has been (5.6 pmol kg)1 h)1). Bilateral vagotomy also signifi- demonstrated in the rat nodose ganglia.4 We have cantly reduced gastric motor responses to secretin. -
Oxytocin Effects in Mothers and Infants During Breastfeeding
© 2013 SNL All rights reserved REVIEW Oxytocin effects in mothers and infants during breastfeeding Oxytocin integrates the function of several body systems and exerts many effects in mothers and infants during breastfeeding. This article explains the pathways of oxytocin release and reviews how oxytocin can affect behaviour due to its parallel release into the blood circulation and the brain. Oxytocin levels are higher in the infant than in the mother and these levels are affected by mode of birth. The importance of skin-to-skin contact and its association with breastfeeding and mother-infant bonding is discussed. Kerstin Uvnäs Moberg Oxytocin – a system activator increased function of inhibitory alpha-2 3 MD, PhD xytocin, a small peptide of just nine adrenoceptors . Professor of Physiology amino acids, is normally associated The regulation of the release of oxytocin Swedish University of Agriculture O with labour and the milk ejection reflex. is complex and can be affected by different [email protected] However, oxytocin is not only a hormone types of sensory inputs, by hormones such Danielle K. Prime but also a neurotransmitter and a as oestrogen and even by the oxytocin 1,2 molecule itself. This article will focus on PhD paracrine substance in the brain . During Breastfeeding Research Associate breastfeeding it is released into the brain of four major sensory input nervous Medela AG, Baar, Switzerland both mother and infant where it induces a pathways (FIGURES 2 and 3) activated by: great variety of functional responses. 1. Sucking of the mother’s nipple, in which Through three different release pathways the sensory nerves originate in the (FIGURE 1), oxytocin functions rather like a breast. -
The Enteric Nervous System: a Second Brain
The Enteric Nervous System: A Second Brain MICHAEL D. GERSHON Columbia University Once dismissed as a simple collection of relay ganglia, the enteric nervous system is now recognized as a complex, integrative brain in its own right. Although we still are unable to relate complex behaviors such as gut motility and secretion to the activity of individual neurons, work in that area is proceeding briskly--and will lead to rapid advances in the management of functional bowel disease. Dr. Gershon is Professor and Chair, Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York. In addition to numerous scientific publications, he is the author of The Second Brain (Harper Collins, New York, 1998). Structurally and neurochemically, the enteric nervous system (ENS) is a brain unto itself. Within those yards of tubing lies a complex web of microcircuitry driven by more neurotransmitters and neuromodulators than can be found anywhere else in the peripheral nervous system. These allow the ENS to perform many of its tasks in the absence of central nervous system (CNS) control--a unique endowment that has permitted enteric neurobiologists to investigate nerve cell ontogeny and chemical mediation of reflex behavior in a laboratory setting. Recognition of the importance of this work as a basis for developing effective therapies for functional bowel disease, coupled with the recent, unexpected discovery of major enteric defects following the knockout of murine genes not previously known to affect the gut, has produced a groundswell of interest that has attracted some of the best investigators to the field. Add to this that the ENS provides the closest thing we have to a window on the brain, and one begins to understand why the bowel--the second brain--is finally receiving the attention it deserves. -
Neurotransmitter Actions
Central University of South Bihar Panchanpur, Gaya, India E-Learning Resources Department of Biotechnology NB: These materials are taken/borrowed/modified/compiled from various resources like research articles and freely available internet websites, and are meant to be used solely for the teaching purpose in a public university, and for serving the needs of specified educational programmes. Dr. Jawaid Ahsan Assistant Professor Department of Biotechnology Central University of South Bihar (CUSB) Course Code: MSBTN2003E04 Course Name: Neuroscience Neurotransmitter Actions • Excitatory Action: – A neurotransmitter that puts a neuron closer to an action potential (facilitation) or causes an action potential • Inhibitory Action: – A neurotransmitter that moves a neuron further away from an action potential • Response of neuron: – Responds according to the sum of all the neurotransmitters received at one time Neurotransmitters • Acetylcholine • Monoamines – modified amino acids • Amino acids • Neuropeptides- short chains of amino acids • Depression: – Caused by the imbalances of neurotransmitters • Many drugs imitate neurotransmitters – Ex: Prozac, zoloft, alcohol, drugs, tobacco Release of Neurotransmitters • When an action potential reaches the end of an axon, Ca+ channels in the neuron open • Causes Ca+ to rush in – Cause the synaptic vesicles to fuse with the cell membrane – Release the neurotransmitters into the synaptic cleft • After binding, neurotransmitters will either: – Be destroyed in the synaptic cleft OR – Taken back in to surrounding neurons (reuptake) Excitable cells: Definition: Refers to the ability of some cells to be electrically excited resulting in the generation of action potentials. Neurons, muscle cells (skeletal, cardiac, and smooth), and some endocrine cells (e.g., insulin- releasing pancreatic β cells) are excitable cells. -
Pin Faculty Directory
Harvard University Program in Neuroscience Faculty Directory 2019—2020 April 22, 2020 Disclaimer Please note that in the following descripons of faculty members, only students from the Program in Neuroscience are listed. You cannot assume that if no students are listed, it is a small or inacve lab. Many faculty members are very acve in other programs such as Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Molecular and Cellular Biology, etc. If you find you are interested in the descripon of a lab’s research, you should contact the faculty member (or go to the lab’s website) to find out how big the lab is, how many graduate students are doing there thesis work there, etc. Program in Neuroscience Faculty Albers, Mark (MGH-East)) De Bivort, Benjamin (Harvard/OEB) Kaplan, Joshua (MGH/HMS/Neurobio) Rosenberg, Paul (BCH/Neurology) Andermann, Mark (BIDMC) Dettmer, Ulf (BWH) Karmacharya, Rakesh (MGH) Rotenberg, Alex (BCH/Neurology) Anderson, Matthew (BIDMC) Do, Michael (BCH—Neurobio) Khurana, Vikram (BWH) Sabatini, Bernardo (HMS/Neurobio) Anthony, Todd (BCH/Neurobio) Dong, Min (BCH) Kim, Kwang-Soo (McLean) Sahay, Amar (MGH) Arlotta, Paola (Harvard/SCRB) Drugowitsch, Jan (HMS/Neurobio) Kocsis, Bernat (BIDMC) Sahin, Mustafa (BCH/Neurobio) Assad, John (HMS/Neurobio) Dulac, Catherine (Harvard/MCB) Kreiman, Gabriel (BCH/Neurobio) Samuel, Aravi (Harvard/ Physics) Bacskai, Brian (MGH/East) Dymecki, Susan(HMS/Genetics) LaVoie, Matthew (BWH) Sanes, Joshua (Harvard/MCB) Baker, Justin (McLean) Engert, Florian (Harvard/MCB) Lee, Wei-Chung (BCH/Neurobio) Saper, Clifford