DOCSLIB.ORG

Greater Manchester Gypsy and Traveller Accommodation Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Greater Manchester Gypsy and Traveller Accommodation Assessment Greater Manchester Gypsy and Traveller Accommodation Assessment Bolton, Bury, Manchester, Oldham, Rochdale, Salford, Stockport, Tameside, Trafford and Wigan Authorities Final Report December 2014 Main Contact: Scott Brand Email: [email protected] Telephone: 01506 200 369 Website: www.arc4.co.uk © 2014 arc4 Limited (Company No. 06205180) AGMA GTAA – Main Report Page | 2 Contents 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................... 8 Study Components ........................................................................................... 9 Report structure .............................................................................................. 10 2. Legislative and Policy Context .................................................................... 12 Legislative background ................................................................................... 12 Policy background .......................................................................................... 12 Local Context – Neighbouring Authorities’ Progress with GTAAs................... 18 CLG Caravan Counts ..................................................................................... 19 Design Guidance ............................................................................................ 19 3. Methodology ................................................................................................. 21 Phase 1: Literature/desktop review and stakeholder consultation .................. 21 Phase 2: Survey of Gypsies and Travellers across Greater Manchester ....... 22 4. The current picture: provision of Gypsy and Traveller sites .................... 29 Provision of authorised and unauthorised sites .............................................. 29 5. The Current Picture: Gypsy and Traveller population and pitch and plot availability .............................................................................................. 35 Population Estimates ...................................................................................... 35 Caravan Counts and Authorised Pitches ........................................................ 36 Tenure of respondents ................................................................................... 39 Repairs and improvements ............................................................................. 40 Space Requirements ...................................................................................... 42 Satisfaction with location of your home .......................................................... 44 Overcrowding ................................................................................................. 44 Facilities shared with other households .......................................................... 45 Cost of accommodation .................................................................................. 45 Location to amenities ...................................................................................... 45 Household mobility ......................................................................................... 50 Planned Moves ............................................................................................... 50 6. Needs Analysis Modelling for 2014/15 to 2018/19 – Gypsies and Travellers ...................................................................................................... 52 Overview of modelling .................................................................................... 52 Baseline model ............................................................................................... 52 Description of factors in the alternative model ................................................ 57 7. Needs Analysis Modelling for 2014/15 to 2018/19 – Travelling Showpeople .................................................................................................. 63 Description of factors in the model ................................................................. 63 8. Longer-term Pitch and Plot Requirements ................................................. 69 December 2014 AGMA GTAA – Main Report Page | 3 Future household formation: Gypsies and Travellers ..................................... 69 Future household formation based on 50% formation rate: Gypsies and Travellers ........................................................................................................ 70 Longer-term plot requirements:Travelling Showpeople .................................. 70 9. Transit Requirements ................................................................................... 73 Step 1: Overall unauthorised encampment activity ......................................... 74 Steps 2 and 3: transit related activity and requirements ................................. 75 Summary of transit need ................................................................................ 92 10. Travelling practices and experiences ......................................................... 95 11. Wider Service and Support Needs ............................................................ 100 Services used in the last year ....................................................................... 100 12. Stakeholder consultation ........................................................................... 103 Overview ...................................................................................................... 103 General support for Gypsies and Travellers ................................................. 103 Provision of accommodation – new and existing .......................................... 104 Planning policy ............................................................................................. 105 Cross-boundary issues ................................................................................. 106 Neighbouring authorities ............................................................................... 107 13. Summary of Findings ................................................................................. 108 Gypsies and Traveller Pitch Requirements .................................................. 108 Travelling Showpeople Plot Requirements ................................................... 109 Transit requirements MB needs updating when transit done ........................ 109 Future research ............................................................................................ 110 Headline findings from the study .................................................................. 110 Headline findings by local authority .............................................................. 112 14. Conclusion and Strategic Response ........................................................ 116 Key issues and how to tackle them .............................................................. 116 Concluding comments .................................................................................. 121 Appendix A: Legislative Background ................................................................. 124 Overall approach .......................................................................................... 124 Appendix B: Policy and Guidance ...................................................................... 127 Introduction ................................................................................................... 127 Appendix C: Fieldwork Questionnaire ............................................................... 138 Appendix D: Stakeholder Consultation ............................................................... 166 Approach ...................................................................................................... 166 General ......................................................................................................... 166 Provision of Accommodation - Site Provision ............................................... 171 Provision of Accommodation ........................................................................ 176 December 2014 AGMA GTAA – Main Report Page | 4 Bricks and Mortar Accommodation ............................................................... 178 Unauthorised Encampments ........................................................................ 182 Planning Policy ............................................................................................. 184 Cross boundary issues ................................................................................. 188 Neighbouring Authorities .............................................................................. 192 Appendix E: Glossary of Terms ........................................................................... 194 List of tables Table 2.1 Gypsy and Traveller and Travelling Showperson requirements and provision in neighbouring authorities .................................................... 18 Table 3.1 Count of Gypsy and Traveller Caravans January 2014 and previous four counts ............................................................................. 23 th Table 3.2 Summary of achieved interviews by type of dwelling (as at 15 October 2014) ...................................................................................... 27 Table 4.1 List of Gypsy & Traveller Site and Pitches (as at November 2014) ...... 30 Table 4.2 Travelling Showperson Yards and Plots (as at November 2014) ......... 31 Table 5.1 Households identifying as WGoIT by
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PART 1 Primary Care Commissioning Committee 2019/20
    PART 1 Primary Care Commissioning Committee 2019/20 Date of Meeting: 14 February 2020 Agenda Item: 2.4 Subject: Application to close the York House Surgery (YHS) site Reporting Officer: Sarah Crossley (Author: Sarah Hickman) Aim of Paper: To provide the Primary Care Assurance Sub-committee with the necessary information to enable them to make a decision regarding the application from Heywood Health to close the YHS site Governance route prior to Primary Care Meeting Date Objective/Outcome Commissioning Committee Primary Care Commissioning Committee Select date of meeting. Click to Select Primary Care Assurance Sub - Committee Select date of meeting. Click to Select Primary Care Innovation and Transformation Select date of meeting. Click to Select Sub-Committee Primary Care Assurance and Transformation Select date of meeting. Click to Select Sub - Committee IM&T Group Select date of meeting. Click to Select Other Click here to enter text. Primary Care Commissioning Committee Approval/Decision Resolution Required: Recommendation The Primary Care Assurance Sub-committee are requested to review the attached paper regarding the application to close the YHS site and make a recommendation to the Primary Care Commissioning Committee as to whether this is supported by members Link to Strategic Objectives Contributes to: (Select Yes or No) SO1: To be a high performing CCG, deliver our statutory duties and use Yes our available resources innovatively to deliver the best outcomes for our population. SO2: To deliver on the outcomes of the Locality
    [Show full text]
  • School Bus Services in Bolton September 2019 to July 2020
    7 School Bus Services in Bolton September 2019 to July 2020 Journeys in this leaflet operate on schooldays only, unless otherwise stated. Although provided primarily for school students, members of the public may use these services with the exception of Yellow School Buses. Services are listed alphabetically under school names. An introduction to School buses and concessionary fares for students in Greater Manchester Passengers can pay a fare to the driver for each journey shown on this timetable. However, students will need to show an IGO pass to travel at the concessionary (reduced) fare. If students do not have an IGO pass, they will have to pay a higher fare. Most of the journeys shown in this timetable are funded by Transport for Greater Manchester (TfGM). The majority of TfGM funded services charge a standard fare and also offer daily return tickets. In some cases, the return ticket can also be used for travel on other journeys which serve similar areas – even if it is provided by a different operator. On most services, students can also buy a weekly scholar’s ticket, which costs £7.40. These are ONLY valid on schooldays on school buses and are available from the bus driver on all services where they are applicable. To help the driver, please try to have the correct fare when buying your ticket. A summary of fares and ticketing information on all school services included in this timetable can be found at https://www.tfgm.com/tickets-and-passes/bus-school-bus-services There are also a small number of TfGM funded services where the operator sets the fares.
    [Show full text]
  • Devo-Health : What and Why? (PDF)
    Harry Quilter-Pinner August 2016 © IPPR 2016 DEVO— HEALTH WHAT & WHY? Institute for Public Policy Research 4. There are risks involved in health devolution. Rather than simplifying the post-Lansley landscape, devo-health in Manchester SUMMARY has so far just created a new level of bureaucracy; rhetoric appears to be running ahead of reality, given that history shows structural changes rarely deliver in terms of efficiency or heath outcomes; and there are very real concerns that ‘devo-health’ will ultimately lead to finger-pointing between central and local government The purpose of this booklet is to set out the context for IPPR’s research as the next round of public sector cuts hit. on devo-health and the questions which we would like this programme 5. Having said that, the most commonly cited concern – that of work to address. We are also setting out some initial hypotheses we will lose the ‘N’ in the NHS – has been exaggerated. about devo-health which we will look to test as we proceed. Significant variation in the quality of care and the health outcomes achieved already exists across England under our KEY FINDINGS more centralised system. While it is feasible that devo-health 1. At the moment, ‘devo-health’ is more akin to delegation than could make this worse, that seems unlikely, especially as the devolution. In Manchester, the health secretary rather than the newly NHS Mandate and NHS Constitution will remain in place. elected mayor will remain ultimately accountable for health and care. 6. A huge number of unanswered questions remain. How Going forward, this may need to change, with local mayors given much freedom should local areas have to differ from national clearly defined roles in the NHS and the centre stepping away from policy? Should full devolution follow delegation? Is there a role its responsibilities, in order to give local leaders ‘skin in the game’ for fiscal devolution? How can local areas unlock the potential and enable local communities to hold them to account.
    [Show full text]
  • (Public Pack)Agenda Document for Council, 20/01/2016 18:15
    Legal & Governance Reform David Wilcock Head of Legal and Governance Reform Governance & Committee Services Floor 2, Number One Riverside, Smith Street, Rochdale, OL16 1XU Phone: 01706 647474 Website: www.rochdale.gov.uk To: All Members of the Council Enquiries to: Peter Thompson e-mail: [email protected] Telephone: 01706 924715 Date: 12th January 2016 Dear Councillor, You are requested to attend the meeting of Council to be held in the Council Chamber at Rochdale Town Hall on Wednesday, 20th January 2016 at 6.15 pm. Deadlines for submissions in respect of this meeting are as follows: – Tuesday before Council Noon Notification of questions to representatives on Joint (19th January 2016) Authorities and Outside Bodies and to Portfolio Holders and Committee Chairs. Notification of amendments to proposals and recommendations being submitted to Council. Notifications should be forwarded to Mark Hardman and Peter Thompson, on behalf of the Chief Executive. The agenda and supporting papers are attached. If you require advice on any agenda item involving a possible Declaration of Interest which could affect your right to speak and/or vote, please contact staff in the Governance and Committee Services Team at least 24 hours in advance of the meeting. Yours Faithfully David Wilcock Head of Legal and Governance Reform Rochdale Borough Council COUNCIL Wednesday, 20th January 2016 at 6.15 pm Council Chamber - Rochdale Town Hall AGENDA Apologies for Absence 1. Mayor's Announcements 2. Declarations of Interest 1 - 2 Members are requested to indicate at this stage any items on the agenda in which they intend to declare an interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Uk Regional Development Programme 1986-90
    EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND UK REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME 1986-90 Section 7E: England — South Yorkshire Section 7F: England — Workington Section 7G: England — Greater Manchester Section 7H: England — Greater Merseyside lUlaUmiãl· I U If ΦΟ DOCUMENT DOCUMENTI CUMENT DOCUMENTO DOK1 ¡NT ΕΓΓΡΑΦΟ DOCUMENT DI JMENTO DOCUMENT UUCUM TU ηυκυΜΕΝΤΕΓΓΡΑΦΟηΐ (MENT DOCUMENTO OUCUMI MHB ΡΑΦΟΟΟΟΟΜΕΜ I tvivl COMMISSION POOGIIIÌEN^DOG OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES ΝΤΕΓΓΡΑΦ( uranFrinii nni-iiupuiiiAnAni This document has been prepared for use within the Commission. It does not necessarily represent the Commission's official position. Cataloguing data can be found at the end of this publication Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 1987 Vol.3 : ISBN 92-825-7194-7 Vol. 1-7: ISBN 92-825-7199-8 Catalogue number: CB-98-87-00J-EN-C © ECSC-EEC-EAEC, Brussels · Luxembourg, 1987 Reproduction is authorized, except for commercial purposes, provided the source is acknowledged. Printed in Belgium Commission of the European Communities European Regional Development Fund UK RE6I0NAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME 1986-90 Section 7E: EngLand - South Yorkshire Section 7F: EngLand - Workington Section 7G: EngLand - Greater Manchester Section 7H: EngLand - Greater Merseyside Document This document has been prepared for use within the Commission. It does not necessarily represent the Commission's official position. Copyright ECSC-EEC-EAEC, Brussels - Luxembourg, 1987 Reproduction is authorized, except for commercial purposes, provided the source is acknowledged. / L European Regional Development Fund UK REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME 1986-90 Section 7E: England - South Yorkshire d UCJ [ \j \ 1' UK REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME 1986-90 CONTENTS The Programme consists of detailed information on regional or sub-regional areas (Sections 7 to 10) preceded by general information on the United Kingdom (Sections 1 to 6).
    [Show full text]
  • Soft-Bodied Fossils from the Roof Shales of the Wigan Four Foot Coal Seam, Westhoughton, Lancashire, UK
    Geol. Mag. 135 (3), 1999. pp. 321-329. Printed in the United Kingdom © 1999 Cambridge University Press 321 Soft-bodied fossils from the roof shales of the Wigan Four Foot coal seam, Westhoughton, Lancashire, UK L. I. ANDERSON*, J. A. DUNLOPf, R. M. C. EAGARJ, C. A. HORROCKS§ & H. M. WILSON]] "Department of Geology and Petroleum Geology, Meston Building, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB24 3UE, UK tlnstitiit fiir Systematische Zoologie, Museum fiir Naturkunde, Invalidenstrasse, D-10115, Berlin, Germany ^Honorary Research Associate, The Manchester Museum, The University of Manchester, M13 9PL, UK §24 Lower Monton Road, Eccles, Manchester, M30 ONX, UK ^Department of Earth Sciences, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK (Received 10 September 1998; accepted21 January 1999) Abstract - Exceptionally preserved fossils are described from the Westhoughton opencast coal pit near Wigan, Lancashire, UK (uppermost Westphalian A, Lower Modiolaris Chronozone, regularis faunal belt). The fossils occur within sideritic concretions in a 1.5-metre zone above the Wigan Four Foot coal seam. Arthropods dominate the fauna and include arachnids, arthropleurids, crustaceans, eurypterids, euthycarcinoids, millipedes and xiphosurans. Vertebrates are represented by a single palaeoniscid fish, numerous disarticulated scales and coprolites. Upright Sigillaria trees, massive bedded units and a general lack of trace fossils in the roof shales of the Wigan Four Foot coal seam suggest that deposi­ tion of the beds containing these concretions was relatively rapid. Discovery of similar faunas at the equivalent stratigraphic level some distance away point to regional rather than localized controls on exceptional preservation. Prior to Anderson et al. (1997), it was generally 1. Introduction believed that exceptionally preserved fossils in Recent investigations of new Upper Carboniferous Lancashire were restricted to the Sparth Bottoms fossil localities in the West Lancashire Coalfield have brick clay pit, Rochdale and the Soapstone bed of the produced significant results (Anderson et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Pub of the Month
    : ee 1982 THE MANCHESTER BEER DRINKER'S MONTHLY MAGAZINE ~ PUB OF THE MONTH | South Manchester's Pub of the Month for March is the Swan with Two Necks, Princes Street, Stockport. The pub is a haven amongst the shopping precinct and has remained unspoilt as Merseyway was developed around it. The tenants, Bernie and Irene Smith, have been at the pub for 8 years, having previously had the tenancy of the now demolished Robin Hood on Brinksway. Bernie is currently president of Stockport & District LVA and Irene is past Chairlady. The Swan with Two Necks provides an extensive and reasonably priced lunchtime menu and tea and coffee are also available for the weary shopper. The social/ presentation night is on Thursday 25th March, which is also Bernie and Irene's 8th anniversary in the pub. All members and friends are invited to come along. REAL ALE IN FLIXTON Xeni ann io : Real ale has reappeared at the Garricks Head and the Fox and Hounds in Elixton, Licensees at the Garricks are Tony and Elaine Copeland, who had the Oxford in Manchester until it closed two years ago. HOP ONTO A PLANE News of Greenalls takeover of the Arrowsmith bit of the failed Laker organisation will be greeted with dancing in the streets of America. Not only will English beer from the wood now be available in Pittsburgh P.A. and Des Moines lowa, but New Yorkers will be able to avail themselves of the services of Fred Dibnah Esq, brick edifice destroyer extraordinaire,to chop down unwanted skyscrapers. Reciprocal arrangements may’ mean American holidaymakers being mugged in Runcorn.
    [Show full text]
  • Time for Change
    I GREATER MANCHESTER SEPTEMBER I986 GHANGEABTE ISSUE NUMBER 8 TIME FOR CHANGE THE lieensing laws in this country have long been a subject of contention in CAMRA, now we have been joined by the Berni and Host Group in the campaign for flexible licensing hours. The above mentioned group have gone to a lot of time and trouble to produce a nicely printed leaflet laying out the case for such a change. Such a move is welcomed by CAMRA. ln case you are unaware of the arguments for flexible hours, here is a summary. The licensing laws currently in force in England and Wales date from an emergency temporary measure introduced while the First World War was raging and was designed to prevent excessive drinking by munitions workers. A system of "permitted hours" was consolidated In the 1921 Licensing Act and remains largely unchanged to this day. Pubs in England and Wales are generally allowed to serve alcohol for nine or nine and a half hours a day with an enforced afternoon break. All the evidence produced over the past twenty years points towards a relaxation in our licensing laws. The'Erroll' Report in 1972 and the'Clayson' Report in 1973 came down strongly in favour of change. A number of national surveys, public opinion polls, the brewing and licensee industry and the Tourist Board have all continually favoured change. Even the Police and Justices'Clerks'Society are in favour of change. The most overwhelming evidence in favour in recent times has been the report on the Scottish experience - the result of implementation of the Clayson Committee report of 1973.
    [Show full text]
  • Where Can I View Documents and Respond to the Greater Manchester Bus Consultation?
    Where can I view documents and respond to the Greater Manchester bus consultation? All documents relating to the consultation and links to the long-form and short-form questionnaires can be accessed online at gmconsult.org. Hard copies of the documents can be viewed at public buildings across Greater Manchester, which are listed below. Long-form and short-form questionnaires and freepost envelopes will also be available for you to submit a response to the consultation. Bolton Bolton Town Hall, Victoria Square, Bolton, BL1 1RU One Stop Shop Bolton Council, Victoria Square, Bolton, BL1 1RJ Blackrod Library, Church Street, Blackrod, Bolton, BL6 5EQ Breightmet Library, Breightmet Fold Lane, Breightmet, Bolton, BL2 6NT Bromley Cross Library, Toppings Estate, Bromley Cross, Bolton, BL7 9JU Central Library, Le Mans Crescent, Bolton, BL1 1SE Farnworth Library, Market Street, Farnworth, Bolton, BL4 7PG Harwood Library, Gate Fold, Harwood, Bolton, BL2 3HN High Street Library, High Street, Bolton, BL3 6SZ Horwich Library, Jones Street, Horwich, Bolton, BL6 6SZ Little Lever Library, Coronation Square, Little Lever, Bolton, BL3 1LP Westhoughton Library, Library Street, Westhoughton, Bolton, BL5 3AU Bury Bury Town Hall, Knowsley Street, Bury, BL9 0ST Bury Library, Manchester Road, Bury, BL9 0DG Prestwich Library, Longfield Centre, Prestwich, Bury, M25 1AY Radcliffe Library, Stand Lane, Radcliffe, Bury, M26 1JA Ramsbottom Library, Carr Street, Ramsbottom, Bury, BL0 9AE Tottington Centre, Market Street, Tottington, Bury, BL8 3LL Manchester Manchester
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Reports Pack (Public) 13/12/2012, 18.15
    Public Document Pack CORPORATE SERVICES Service Director Linda Fisher GOVERNANCE AND COMMITTEE SERVICES TEAM PO Box 15, Town Hall, Rochdale, OL16 1AB DX22831 ROCHDALE Tel: (01706) 647474 Fax: (01706) 924705 Website: www.rochdale.gov.uk To: All Members of the Overview and Scrutiny Enquiries to: Peter Thompson Committee e-mail: [email protected] Extension: 4715 Date: 5th December 2012 Dear Councillor OVERVIEW AND SCRUTINY COMMITTEE You are requested to attend the meeting of the Overview and Scrutiny Committee to be held in Committee Rooms 1 and 2 at Rochdale Town Hall on 13 th December 2012 commencing at 6.15 pm. The agenda and supporting papers are attached. If you require advice on any agenda item involving a possible Declaration of Interest which could affect your right to speak and/or vote, please contact staff in the Governance and Committee Services Team at least 24 hours in advance of the meeting. Yours faithfully Linda Fisher Service Director Overview and Scrutiny Committee Membership 2012/13:- Councillor Daalat Ali Councillor Malcolm Boriss Councillor Robert Clegg Councillor Karen Danczuk Councillor Neil Emmott Councillor Susan Emmott Councillor Pat Greenall Councillor Michael Holly Councillor Andy Kelly Councillor Liam O'Rourke Councillor Martin Rodgers ROCHDALE METROPOLITAN BOROUGH COUNCIL OVERVIEW AND SCRUTINY COMMITTEE 13 th December 2012 at 6.15 pm Committee Rooms 1 and 2, Rochdale Town Hall A G E N D A Apologies for Absence 1. Declarations of Interest Members are requested to indicate at this stage any items on the agenda in which they intend to declare an interest. Members are reminded that, in accordance with the Localism Act 2011 and the Council's newly adopted Code of Conduct, they must declare the nature of any personal or discloseable pecuniary interest required of them and, in the case of any discloseable pecuniary interest withdraw from the meeting during consideration of the item, unless permitted otherwise within the Code of Conduct.
    [Show full text]
  • What Trans84pp Final:Layout 1
    Greater Manchester’s Future Transport What the Transport Innovation Fund Package includes A description of the proposed improvements to public transport and the congestion charging scheme in Greater Manchester July 2008 Information Pack Document no. 2 Contents Glossary 3 Your Views Are Important 4 Introduction 5 The investment package 6 Delivering better bus services 7 Improvements to the local rail network 23 Improvements to the Metrolink network 32 Fares, ticketing and improved information systems 47 Safety and security 49 Interchanges 51 Park & ride 57 Behavioural change 60 Congestion charging 65 Appendices 80 2 Glossary AGMA Association of Greater Manchester Authorities ANPR Automatic Number Plate Recognition CROPT Crime Reduction on Public Transport Partnership CT Community Transport DCSF Department for Children, Schools and Families DfT Department for Transport DRT Demand Responsive Transport DVLA Driver and Vehicle Licensing Authority FT Flexible Transport GMBOA Greater Manchester Bus Operators’ Association GMP Greater Manchester Police GMPTA Greater Manchester Passenger Transport Authority GMPTE Greater Manchester Passenger Transport Executive HLOS High Level Output Specification P and R Park and Ride RCTS Regional Centre Transport Strategy RFA Regional Funding Allocation TIF Transport Innovation Fund YSB Yellow School Bus 3 Your views are important We are particularly interested to hear the views of local residents and businesses – that’s why a Consultation Brochure has been sent to all homes and businesses in Greater Manchester. Within the brochure is a response form that can be filled in with your views and returned to the following address in the freepost envelope enclosed in the brochure by 10 October 2008. GM Future Transport Consultation Ipsos MORI Admail Freepost 4115 Manchester M4 5ZZ Responses can also be provided by a number of other means • Online at www.gmfuturetransport.com • Via email to: [email protected] • In writing to the GM Future Transport Consultation freepost address • By texting us free @ 60013.
    [Show full text]
  • Manchester City Region
    Manchester City Region - Demand and Aspirations of Minority Ethnic communities Final Report Manchester City Region - Demand and Aspirations of Minority Ethnic communities Final Report December 2006 ECOTEC Tower Business Centre Portland Tower Portland Street Manchester M1 3LF T +44 (0)161 238 4965 F +44 (0)161 238 4966 www.ecotec.com Acknowledgements This report has been commissioned as one part of the Making Housing Count in the Manchester City Region research project. It has been overseen by the Making Housing Count Project Sponsors' Group (PSG) as well as a Technical Sounding Board and these have provided useful feedback on findings. Particular thanks are due to all those who have helped to set up, or participated in the interviews and focus groups, without which this research would not have been possible. Census output used in this report is Crown Copyright 2003. Crown copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen's Printer for Scotland. Click-use License No. C2006010569 Contents PAGE Executive Summary............................................................................................. 1 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................... 6 2.0 Scope and Methodology ....................................................................... 8 3.0 National Context.................................................................................. 12 3.1 Introduction ..............................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]