DOCSLIB.ORG

Greater Manchester Green Belt Assessment (2016)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Greater Manchester Green Belt Assessment FINAL REPORT Prepared by LUC July 2016 Project Title: Greater Manchester Green Belt Assessment Client: Manchester City Council, on behalf of Bolton MBC, Bury MBC, Manchester City Council, Oldham MBC, Rochdale MBC, Salford CC, Stockport MBC, Tameside MBC, Trafford MBC and Wigan MBC Version Date Version Details Prepared by Checked by Approved by 1 26/05/16 Draft Report Sarah Young Sarah Young Nick James Nick James Alex Burton Kate Nicholls Kieran Moroney Graham Cameron Ben Gurney 2 30/06/16 Draft Final Report Sarah Young Sarah Young Nick James Nick James Alex Burton 3 25/07/16 Final Report Sarah Young Sarah Young Nick James Planning & EIA LUC BRISTOL Offices also in: Land Use Consultants Ltd th Registered in England Design 12 Floor Colston Tower London Registered number: 2549296 Landscape Planning Colston Street Bristol Glasgow Registered Office: Landscape Management BS1 4XE Edinburgh 43 Chalton Street Ecology T +44 (0)117 929 1997 London NW1 1JD FS 566056 EMS 566057 LUC uses 100% recycled paper Mapping & Visualisation [email protected] Contents 1 Introduction 1 Study objectives and scope 1 Consultation 2 Report structure 2 2 Context 3 National Green Belt policy 3 Greater Manchester local planning policy 4 Green Belt guidance and case law 11 The Greater Manchester Green Belt 13 The character of the Greater Manchester Green Belt 19 3 Methodology 22 Part 1: Developing the methodology 23 Parcel definition 23 Assessment criteria 24 Part 2: Identification and assessment of land parcels 38 Desk based assessment 38 Field survey 39 Analysis 39 Consultation 39 4 Findings 40 Presentation of findings 40 Bolton Metropolitan Borough Council 41 Bury Metropolitan Borough Council 45 Manchester City Council 48 Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council 50 Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council 53 Salford City Council 57 Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council 60 Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council 64 Trafford Metropolitan Borough Council 68 Wigan Metropolitan Borough Council 71 5 Conclusions and Next Steps 77 Conclusions 77 Next Steps 78 Appendices Appendix 4.1: Strategic Green Belt Area Assessment Appendix 4.2: Bolton Detailed Assessments Appendix 4.3: Bury Detailed Assessments Appendix 4.4: Manchester Detailed Assessments Appendix 4.5: Oldham Detailed Assessments Appendix 4.6: Rochdale Detailed Assessments Appendix 4.7: Salford Detailed Assessments Appendix 4.8: Stockport Detailed Assessments Appendix 4.9: Tameside Detailed Assessments Appendix 4.10: Trafford Detailed Assessments Appendix 4.11: Wigan Detailed Assessments Figures Figure 2.1: Extent of Green Belt in Manchester Figure 3.1: Strategic Green Belt Areas Figure 4.1: Bolton - Performance against Green Belt Purpose 1 - Criterion 1a Figure 4.2: Bolton - Performance against Green Belt Purpose 1 - Criterion 1b Figure 4.3: Bolton - Performance against Green Belt Purpose 2 Figure 4.4: Bolton - Performance against Green Belt Purpose 3 Figure 4.5: Bolton - Performance against Green Belt Purpose 4 Figure 4.6: Bury - Performance against Green Belt Purpose 1 - Criterion 1a Figure 4.7: Bury - Performance against Green Belt Purpose 1 - Criterion 1b Figure 4.8: Bury - Performance against Green Belt Purpose 2 Figure 4.9: Bury - Performance against Green Belt Purpose 3 Figure 4.10: Bury - Performance against Green Belt Purpose 4 Figure 4.11: Manchester - Performance against Green Belt Purpose 1 - Criterion 1a Figure 4.12: Manchester - Performance against Green Belt Purpose 1 - Criterion 1b Figure 4.13: Manchester - Performance against Green Belt Purpose 2 Figure 4.14: Manchester - Performance against Green Belt Purpose 3 Figure 4.15: Manchester - Performance against Green Belt Purpose 4 Figure 4.16: Oldham - Performance against Green Belt Purpose 1 - Criterion 1a Figure 4.17: Oldham - Performance against Green Belt Purpose 1 - Criterion 1b Figure 4.18: Oldham - Performance against Green Belt Purpose 2 Figure 4.19: Oldham - Performance against Green Belt Purpose 3 Figure 4.20: Oldham - Performance against Green Belt Purpose 4 Figure 4.21: Rochdale - Performance against Green Belt Purpose 1 - Criterion 1a Figure 4.22: Rochdale - Performance against Green Belt Purpose 1 - Criterion 1b Figure 4.23: Rochdale - Performance against Green Belt Purpose 2 Figure 4.24: Rochdale - Performance against Green Belt Purpose 3 Figure 4.25: Rochdale - Performance against Green Belt Purpose 4 Figure 4.26: Salford - Performance against Green Belt Purpose 1 - Criterion 1a Figure 4.27: Salford - Performance against Green Belt Purpose 1 - Criterion 1b Figure 4.28: Salford - Performance against Green Belt Purpose 2 Figure 4.29: Salford - Performance against Green Belt Purpose 3 Figure 4.30: Salford - Performance against Green Belt Purpose 4 Figure 4.31: Stockport - Performance against Green Belt Purpose 1 - Criterion 1a Figure 4.32: Stockport - Performance against Green Belt Purpose 1 - Criterion 1b Figure 4.33: Stockport - Performance against Green Belt Purpose 2 Figure 4.34: Stockport - Performance against Green Belt Purpose 3 Figure 4.35: Stockport - Performance against Green Belt Purpose 4 Figure 4.36: Tameside - Performance against Green Belt Purpose 1 - Criterion 1a Figure 4.37: Tameside - Performance against Green Belt Purpose 1 - Criterion 1b Figure 4.38: Tameside - Performance against Green Belt Purpose 2 Figure 4.39: Tameside - Performance against Green Belt Purpose 3 Figure 4.40: Tameside - Performance against Green Belt Purpose 4 Figure 4.41: Trafford - Performance against Green Belt Purpose 1 - Criterion 1a Figure 4.42: Trafford - Performance against Green Belt Purpose 1 - Criterion 1b Figure 4.43: Trafford - Performance against Green Belt Purpose 2 Figure 4.44: Trafford - Performance against Green Belt Purpose 3 Figure 4.45: Trafford - Performance against Green Belt Purpose 4 Figure 4.46: Wigan - Performance against Green Belt Purpose 1 - Criterion 1a Figure 4.47: Wigan - Performance against Green Belt Purpose 1 - Criterion 1b Figure 4.48: Wigan - Performance against Green Belt Purpose 2 Figure 4.49: Wigan - Performance against Green Belt Purpose 3 Figure 4.50: Wigan - Performance against Green Belt Purpose 4 1 Introduction Study objectives and scope 1.1 LUC was commissioned on behalf of the ten Greater Manchester Authorities1 by Manchester City Council to undertake an assessment of the Green Belt within Greater Manchester. The Study was overseen by a Steering Group comprising officers of the respective authorities. 1.2 The overall aim of the Study was to assess the extent to which the land within the Greater Manchester Green Belt performs against the purposes of Green Belts, as set out in paragraph 80 of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF): • to check the unrestricted sprawl of large built-up areas; • to prevent neighbouring towns merging into one another; • to assist in safeguarding the countryside from encroachment; • to preserve the setting and special character of historic towns; and • to assist in urban regeneration, by encouraging the recycling of derelict and other urban land. 1.3 The NPPF attaches great importance to Green Belts and stresses that their essential characteristics are ‘openness and permanence’. It also advises that, once established, Green Belt boundaries should only be altered in exceptional circumstances through the preparation or review of a local plan. 1.4 The broad extent of the Green Belt in Greater Manchester was established in the 1981 Greater Manchester Structure Plan and detailed boundaries were introduced in the Greater Manchester Green Belt Local Plan which was adopted in 1984. A full assessment of the Green Belt boundaries in Greater Manchester has not been undertaken since the original boundaries were adopted in 1984, although there have been alterations through individual Local Authority development plans where exceptional circumstances have required amendments, or where additional land was added to the Green Belt through Local Plans in the 1980’s and 1990’s. 1.5 The aim of this Green Belt Assessment is therefore to provide the Greater Manchester Authorities with an objective, evidence-based and independent assessment of how Manchester’s Green Belt contributes to the five purposes of Green Belt, as set out in national policy. It also examines the case for including within the Green Belt potential additional areas of land that currently lie outside it. The Study does not advise on the suitability or potential of land in Great Manchester for development. It also does not consider whether ‘exceptional circumstances’ exist or make any recommendations relating to the alteration or review of Green Belt boundaries. 1.6 There is an important difference between a Green Belt Assessment, which assesses the relative performance of the Green Belt, and a Green Belt Review, which looks at the need for areas to be removed or added to the Green Belt (for example to accommodate development). A Green Belt Review requires judgements to be made about the amount and location of land that should be added to or removed from the Green Belt, and is informed by a Green Belt Assessment as well as other planning issues. This Study is the former - a Green Belt ‘Assessment’. 1 Bolton MBC, Bury MBC, Manchester City Council, Oldham MBC, Rochdale MBC, Salford CC, Stockport MBC, Tameside MBC, Trafford MBC and Wigan MBC. 1 1.7 The outputs of the study, alongside other assessments will form a component of the evidence base informing the preparation of the Greater Manchester Spatial Framework (GMSF). This is a joint plan to manage the supply of land for housing
Recommended publications
  • Manchester Metrolink Tram System

    Manchester Metrolink Tram System

    Feature New Promise of LRT Systems Manchester Metrolink Tram System William Tyson Introduction to Greater city that could be used by local rail into the city centre either in tunnel or on Manchester services—taking them into the central the street. area—to complete closure and I carried out an appraisal of these options The City of Manchester (pop. 500,000) is replacement of the services by buses. Two and showed that closure of the lines had at the heart of the Greater Manchester options were to convert some heavy rail a negative benefit-to-cost ratio, and that— conurbation comprised of 10 lines to light rail (tram) and extend them at the very least—they should be kept municipalities that is home to 2.5 million people. The municipalities appoint a Passenger Transport Authority (PTA) for the Figure 1 Metrolink Future Network whole area to set policies and the Greater 1 Victoria Manchester Passenger Transport Executive 2 Shudehill 3 Market Street Rochdale Town Centre 4 Mosley Street (GMPTE) to implement them. Buses Newbold Manchester 5 Piccadilly Gardens Drake Street Piccadilly Kingsway Business Park 6 Rochdale provide most public transport. They are 7 St Peter's Square Railway Milnrow Station deregulated and can compete with each 8 G-Max (for Castlefield) Newhey London 9 Cornbrook other and with other modes. There is a 0 Pomona Bury - Exchange Quay local rail network serving Manchester, and = Salford Quays Buckley Wells ~ Anchorage ! Harbour City linking it with the surrounding areas and @ Broadway Shaw and Crompton # Langworthy also other regions of the country. Street $ Tradfford Bar trams vanished from Greater Manchester % Old Trafford Radcliffe ^ Wharfside* & Manchester United* in 1951, but returned in a very different * Imperial War Museum for the North* ( Lowry Centre form in 1992.
  • Bus Franchising Scheme and Notice

    Bus Franchising Scheme and Notice

    Public Document BUS FRANCHISING SCHEME & NOTICE – 30 March 2021 This page is intentionally left blank Agenda Item 1 TRANSPORT ACT 2000 The Greater Manchester Franchising Scheme for Buses 2021 Made 30/03/2021 ARRANGEMENT OF THE SCHEME 1. CITATION AND COMMENCEMENT…………………………………………………………………………………1 2. INTERPRETATION………………………………………………………………………………………………….……...1 3. THE FRANCHISING SCHEME AREA AND SUB-AREAS………………………………………………….…..2 4. ENTRY INTO LOCAL SERVICE CONTRACTS……………………………………………………………………..2 5. SERVICES UNDER LOCAL SERVICE CONTRACTS………………………………………………….………….3 6. EXCEPTIONS FROM THE SCHEME……………………………………………………………………….………..3 7. SCHEME FACILITIES………………………………………………………………………………………………….…..3 8. PLAN FOR CONSULTING ON OPERATION OF THE SCHEME……………………………………………4 ANNEXES TO THE SCHEME………………………………………………………………………………………………………..5 ANNEX 1: SERVICES INCLUDED – ARTICLE 5…………………………………………………………………….………..5 ANNEX 2: SERVICES INCLUDED – ARTICLE 5.2.3………………………………………………………………………..11 ANNEX 3: EXCEPTED SERVICES – ARTICLE 6………………………………………………………………………………14 ANNEX 4: TEMPORARY EXCEPTIONS – ANNEX 3 PARAGRAPHS 1.2 AND 1.3……………………………..15 ANNEX 5: FRANCHISING SCHEME SUB-AREAS…………………………………………………………………………..18 Page 1 WHEREAS: A The Transport Act 2000 (as amended) ("2000 Act") makes provision for a franchising authority to make a franchising scheme covering the whole or any part of its area. The GMCA is a franchising authority as defined in the 2000 Act. B The GMCA gave notice of its intention to prepare an assessment of a proposed scheme in accordance with sections 123B and section 123C(4) of the 2000 Act on 30 June 2017. Having complied with the process as set out in the Act, the GMCA may determine to make the scheme in accordance with sections 123G and 123H of the 2000 Act. NOW, therefore, the Mayor on behalf of the GMCA, in exercise of the powers conferred by sections 123G and 123H of the 2000 Act, and of all other enabling powers, hereby MAKES THE FOLLOWING FRANCHISING SCHEME (the "Scheme"): 1.
  • An Assessment of Trafford's Public Rights of Way Network

    An Assessment of Trafford's Public Rights of Way Network

    An Assessment of Trafford’s Public Rights of Way Network Stage One of the Rights of Way Improvement Plan for Trafford DECEMBER 2007 An Assessment of Trafford’s Rights of Way Network Stage 1 of the Rights of Way improvement Plan for Trafford MBC December 2007 Prepared By: For: Landscape Practice Trafford MBC MEDC The Built Environment PO Box 463 2nd Floor Town Hall Waterside House Manchester Sale Waterside M60 3NY Sale M33 7ZF Document : Stage 1 ROWIP for Trafford MBC Prepared By: Checked By: Issue Date Issue 1 14/06/07 Becky Burton Ian Graham Issue 2 21/12/07 Project Manager Project Director Ref: XX32857/DOC/30/03/ Issue 2 XX32/DOC/30/03 December 07 Contents Page No Lists of Tables and Figures i Glossary ii 1.0 What is a Rights of Way Improvement Plan (ROWIP) 1 2.0 Introduction to Trafford 3 3.0 Trafford’s Approach to Delivering their ROWIP 4 4.0 Legal Definitions 5 5.0 Rights of Way and the Local Transport Plan 9 6.0 Linking the ROWIP to other Documents and Strategies 13 7.0 Network Comparisons 20 8.0 Management of Trafford’s PROW 21 9.0 Consultation 22 9.1 Consultation Process 22 9.2 Summary of the Questionnaire Results 24 10.0 Assessment of the Current Provision and Future Demand 26 10.1 The Current Definitive Map and Statement 26 10.2 Ease of Use – The Existing Condition of the Rights 28 of Way Network 10.3 The Needs and Demands of the User 33 11.0 Conclusions 39 XX32/DOC/30/03 December 07 Appendices Appendix 1 List of Consultees 42 Appendix 2 Results of the Trafford MBC Rights of Way Improvement 46 Plan Consultation Appendix 3 Home Locations of Respondents to Trafford ROWIP 93 Questionnaire Appendix 4 Copy of the Questionnaire 94 Appendix 5 Copy of the Consultation Letter 97 XX32/DOC/30/03 December 07 List of Maps, Tables and Figures Page No.
  • The Warburtons of Hale Barns

    The Warburtons of Hale Barns

    The Warburtons of Hale Barns Last Updated 5th September 2021 ©2018, 2019, 2020, 2021 Ray Warburton PREFACE This is my own tree. It originated in Hale Barns and was well established by 1600. My earliest certain ancestor is George (died 1639), but there is evidence his father was Thomas (died 1634). The tree is shown in several charts to make them a manageable size.The Ringley Clan is linked by DNA and is probably linked genealogically to the Mobberley branch. Table of Contents Hale Barns Preface i Surnames 1 Descendants of Thomas Warburton & Alice First Generation 3 Second Generation 5 Third Generation 8 Fourth Generation 11 Fifth Generation 18 Sixth Generation 30 Seventh Generation 44 Eighth Generation 61 Ninth Generation 95 Tenth Generation 140 Eleventh Generation 178 Twelfth Generation 206 Place Index 214 Person Index 251 ii Surnames A Artingstall, Ashley, Ashworth, Atkinson B Bailey, Bancks, Bancroft, Barber, Barlow, Barnett, Barrington, Barrow, Batty, Bayley, Beech, Bennet, Bennett, Bentley, Benton, Beswick, Bibby, Birch, Blackhurst, Blackshaw, Bleakly, Blomeley, Blows, Boon, Booth, Bourne, Bowers, Bracegirdle, Braddock, Bradshaw, Bray, Brereton, Brocklehurst, Brook, Broughton, Burden, Burgess, Burrows, Burton C Carter, Cartwright, Castalaneli, Cheetham, Cherry, Clarke, Clements, Cliff, Cliffe, Coan, Colclough, Colley, Collis, Consterdine, Cooke, Cooper, Coppock, Coxon, Cragg, Cresswell, Crosby, Cross, Crowe D Dalenoord, Darbyshire, Darlington, Davenport, Davies, Dean, Deardon, Debenham, Devis, Dicken, Dickin, Dooley, Durber, Dutton
  • Trafford Park Masterplan Baseline Assessment

    Trafford Park Masterplan Baseline Assessment

    Trafford Park Masterplan Baseline Assessment A Report for the Trafford Economic Alliance By EKOS, CBRE, URBED and WSP August 2008 EKOS Consulting (UK) Ltd 2 Mount Street Manchester M2 5WQ TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES............................................................................................ 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY......................................................................................................... 12 2 INTRODUCTION AND STUDY CONTEXT ..................................................................... 23 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 23 STUDY CONTEXT.................................................................................................................... 23 HISTORICAL CONTEXT ............................................................................................................ 24 STUDY CONTEXT AND MASTERPLAN OBJECTIVES .................................................................... 29 STUDY AREA.......................................................................................................................... 31 BASELINE REPORT OBJECTIVES AND STRUCTURE.................................................................... 31 3 REGENERATION AND PLANNING POLICY REVIEW.................................................. 33 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 33 NATIONAL POLICY
  • Archbishops Council Corporate Template

    Archbishops Council Corporate Template

    National Society Statutory Inspection of Anglican and Methodist Schools Report Broadbottom Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School Mottram Road, Broadbottom, Longdendale, Hyde. SK14 6BB Previous SIAS grade: Outstanding Current inspection grade: Outstanding Diocese: Chester Local authority: Tameside Date of inspection: 16 June 2016 Date of last inspection: 5 April 2011 School’s unique reference number: 106227 Headteacher: Esther Bland Inspector’s name and number: Anne B. Woodcock 445 School context The school serves the mixed socio-economic community of Broadbottom in the Longdendale Valley. All of the 108 pupils are of White British heritage. Most live in Broadbottom. The proportion of pupils known to attract the pupil premium grant is average. The school supports an average proportion of children with additional needs. The headteacher became the executive headteacher in September 2014, when she was appointed to lead Mottram Church of England Primary school in the neighbouring village. Her time is split equally between both schools. The distinctiveness and effectiveness of Broadbottom as a Church of England school are outstanding The strong, creative leadership of the headteacher, ably supported by dedicated staff and governors, inspires and drives all aspects of church school improvement. Pupils’ outstanding behaviour and attitudes to life and learning are clearly attributed to the school’s mission statement and their understanding of core Christian values. The explicitly expressed Christian values of forgiveness and love nurture and support all members of the school family. The strong, purposeful and mutually beneficial links with the church make a very significant contribution to the school’s Christian character and to the spiritual growth of pupils and staff.
  • 9521O 1-2012-10-17.Pdf

    9521O 1-2012-10-17.Pdf

    IMPORTANT NOTICE NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION TO ANY U.S. PERSON OR TO ANY PERSON OR ADDRESS IN THE U.S. IMPORTANT: You must read the following before continuing. The following applies to the offering circular following this page, and you are therefore advised to read this carefully before reading, accessing or making any other use of the offering circular. In accessing the offering circular, you agree to be bound by the following terms and conditions, including any modifications to them any time you receive any information from us as a result of such access. NOTHING IN THIS ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION CONSTITUTES AN OFFER TO SELL OR THE SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THE SECURITIES OF THE ISSUER IN THE UNITED STATES OR ANY OTHER JURISDICTION WHERE IT IS UNLAWFUL TO DO SO. THE SECURITIES HAVE NOT BEEN, AND WILL NOT BE, REGISTERED UNDER THE U.S. SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED (THE “SECURITIES ACT”), OR THE SECURITIES LAWS OF ANY STATE OF THE U.S. OR OTHER JURISDICTION AND THE SECURITIES MAY NOT BE OFFERED OR SOLD WITHIN THE U.S. OR TO, OR FOR THE ACCOUNT OR BENEFIT OF, U.S. PERSONS (AS DEFINED IN REGULATION S UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT), EXCEPT PURSUANT TO AN EXEMPTION FROM, OR IN A TRANSACTION NOT SUBJECT TO, THE REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS OF THE SECURITIES ACT AND APPLICABLE STATE OR LOCAL SECURITIES LAWS. THE FOLLOWING OFFERING CIRCULAR MAY NOT BE FORWARDED OR DISTRIBUTED TO ANY OTHER PERSON AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED IN ANY MANNER WHATSOEVER, AND IN PARTICULAR, MAY NOT BE FORWARDED TO ANY U.S.
  • Housing Land Availability Study 2008

    Housing Land Availability Study 2008

    Housing Land Availability Study Adjusted to March 2008 Development and Regeneration Department Planning Division– Spatial Planning Team 1 Current Housing Land Commitment Adjusted to March 2008 Background 1) This note updates the housing land position relating to the situation at the 31st March 2008 and considers the distribution of development land, provides information on new planning permission ns, and assesses the balance between private and housing association provision. It also provides detailed information relating to dwellings completed in the past year. Housing Land Requirements & Supply 2) Planning Policy Statement 3: Housing (PPS 3) was published in November 2006 with an objective to ensure that the planning system delivers a flexible, responsive supply of land, reflecting the principles of “Plan, Monitor, Manage”. From April 2007 Local Planning Authorities are required to identify sufficient specific and deliverable sites to ensure a rolling 5-year supply of housing and demonstrate the extent to which existing plans already fulfil the housing requirement. To be deliverable sites must be: available, suitable and achievable in the next 5 years and there is also a requirement to demonstrate a 15 year supply. 3) To address this the Local Planning Authority is required to undertake an annual Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (SHLAA). The first SHLAA for Bolton was commenced in December 2007 by consultants Roger Tym & Partners and the results from this will be published in the summer 2008 including a 5 and 15 year housing supply figures. 4) The SHLAA replaces the former annual Housing Land Availability Study that updated the housing land position in the Borough and reported on the distribution of development land, provided information on new planning permissions and dwelling completions.
  • Aspull, New Springs and Whelley Community Profile

    Aspull, New Springs and Whelley Community Profile

    Aspull, New Springs and Whelley Community Profile 1.Aspull Library 2.The Surgery 3.Canon Sharples CE Primary School & Nursery 4.Holy Family RC Primary School, New Springs, Wigan 5.St David Haigh & Aspull CE Primary School 6.Our Lady's RC Primary School, Wigan 7. Aspull Church Primary School 8. New Springs Pharmacy 9. WA Salter (Chemists) Ltd 10. Standish and Aspull Childrens Centre 11. Aspull Rugby 12. Aspull Football Junior 13. Aspull Civic Hall 14. Truly Scrumptious Café Aspull, New Springs and Whelley Community Profile Overview of the area Aspull, New Springs and Whelley have a combined resident population of 12,259 which represents 3.8% of the total Wigan resident population of 319,700. Aspull, New Springs & Whelley have a slightly older demographic with 20.3% of all residents aged 65+, above the borough average of 17.6% 11.5% of households are aged 65+ and live alone compared with 11.7% of the borough households. Aspull, New Springs and Whelley has a mix of affluent and deprived communities. Areas such as Chorley Road rank within the top 20% most affluent in England, whilst the areas of Haigh, Whelley and Lincoln Drive are neither affluent nor deprived falling within the 50-60% banding within the Indices of Multiple Deprivation. Holly Road Estate ranks within the top 30% most deprived 11.8% of residents claim out of work benefits, below the borough average of 15.9%. The community is relatively healthy with 6.9% of residents describing their health as ‘bad’ or ‘very bad’ compared with the borough average of 7.1%.
  • Pdf Copy of the Report

    Pdf Copy of the Report

    City of Manchester Plan 1945, abridged edition This report has been digitised by Joe Blakey and Martin Dodge from the Department of Geography, University of Manchester. The digitisation was supported by the Manchester Statistical Society’s Campion Fund. The copy of the report digitised kindly provided by Richard Brook, Manchester School of Architecture. Permission to digitise and release the report under Creative Commons license was kindly granted by Manchester Libraries, Information and Archives, Manchester City Council. (Email: [email protected]) This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. 20 July 2013. C O NTENTS PR A .. page 2 I. TH D · I N 3 The Purpose of Pla nning- The Pla n in Outline-Ways and Mean II . H F UN I ATION 7 Basic Surveys-Popula tion- The Fa mily Unit J II . II • RAM WORK 10 The Z ning Scheme- Indu trial Planning- Highways JV. T H STR TUR 16 Design fo r Li ving- Ho mes- Types of Dwelling - l ndoor Space- Outdoor Space- School - The eighbo urhood- The District Y. R H SJN 28 Density- The Overspi ll Pro blem- The Redevelopment Programme- The Satellite VJ. 36 Sy tem- Ri vers- A mokeless ity- District H eating YJL. T li E R , IONAL A PJT L 40 Learning, Med icine a nd Lhe rts-The ity Centre-Transport- C ivic Building V LJL. T I-l - OND IT IONS 0 u ss 51 Fu rther Legisla ti o n- Loca l Government- T he Prospect Th e author\· acknowl dgment and thanks ore due to MR.
  • Wayfarer Rail Diagram 2020 (TPL Spring 2020)

    Wayfarer Rail Diagram 2020 (TPL Spring 2020)

    Darwen Littleborough Chorley Bury Parbold Entwistle Rochdale Railway Smithy Adlington Radcliffe Kingsway Station Bridge Newbold Milnrow Newhey Appley Bridge Bromley Cross Business Park Whitefield Rochdale Blackrod Town Centre Gathurst Hall i' th' Wood Rochdale Shaw and Besses o' th' Barn Crompton Horwich Parkway Bolton Castleton Oldham Orrell Prestwich Westwood Central Moses Gate Mills Hill Derker Pemberton Heaton Park Lostock Freehold Oldham Oldham Farnworth Bowker Vale King Street Mumps Wigan North Wigan South Western Wallgate Kearsley Crumpsall Chadderton Moston Clifton Abraham Moss Hollinwood Ince Westhoughton Queens Road Hindley Failsworth MonsallCentral Manchester Park Newton Heath Salford Crescent Salford Central Victoria and Moston Ashton-underStalybridgeMossley Greenfield -Lyne Clayton Hall Exchange Victoria Square Velopark Bryn Swinton Daisy HillHag FoldAthertonWalkdenMoorside Shudehill Etihad Campus Deansgate- Market St Holt Town Edge Lane Droylsden Eccles Castlefield AudenshawAshtonAshton Moss West Piccadilly New Islington Cemetery Road Patricroft Gardens Ashton-under-Lyne Piccadilly St Peter’s Guide Weaste Square ArdwickAshburys GortonFairfield Bridge FloweryNewton FieldGodley for HydeHattersleyBroadbottomDinting Hadfield Eccles Langworthy Cornbrook Deansgate Manchester Manchester Newton-le- Ladywell Broadway Pomona Oxford Road Belle Vue Willows HarbourAnchorage City Salford QuaysExchange Quay Piccadilly Hyde North MediaCityUK Ryder Denton Glossop Brow Earlestown Trafford Hyde Central intu Wharfside Bar Reddish Trafford North
  • Dukinfield) OLD CHAPEL and the UN1 TA R I a N STORY

    Dukinfield) OLD CHAPEL and the UN1 TA R I a N STORY

    OLD CHAPEL AND THE UNITARIAN- - STORY (Dukinfield) OLD CHAPEL AND THE UN1 TA R I A N STORY DAVID C. DOEL UNITARIAN PUBLICATION Lindsey Press 1 Essex Street Strand London WC2R 3HY ISBN 0 853 19 049 6 Printed by Jervis Printers 78 Stockport Road Ashton-Under-Lyne Tameside CONTENTS PREFACE CHAPTER ONE: AN OLD CHAPEL HERITAGE TRAIL CHAPTER TWO: BIDDLE AND THE SOCINIANS CHAPTER THREE: THE CIVIL WAR CHAPTER FOUR: MILTON AND LOCKE CHAPTER FIVE: SAMUEL ANGIER AND HIS CONTEMPORARIES CHAPTER SIX: JOSEPH PRIESTLEY CHAPTER SEVEN: WILLIAM ELLERY CHANNING CHAPTER EIGHT: FIRST HALF OF THE NINETEENTH CENTURY CHAPTER NINE: HOPPS, MARTINEAU AND WICKSTEED CHAPTER TEN: FIRST HALF OF THE TWENTIETH CENTURY CHAPTER ELEVEN: SECOND HALF OF THE TWENTIETH CENTURY APPENDIX Ai WHERE THE STORY BEGINS APPENDIX B: THE TRINITY APPENDIX C: THE ALLEGORICAL METHOD APPENDIX D: BIBLIOGRAPHY APPENDIX E: GLOSSARY SIX ILLUSTRATIONS: a) Old Chapel exterior b) Old Chapel interior c) The original Chapel d) The Old School e) The New School f) The Original Schoc! OLD CHAPEL, DUKlNFlELD PREFACE Old Testament prophets, or was he a unique expression, once and once only, of God on earth in human form? OLD CHAPEL AND THE UNITARIAN STORY is an account of the life and history of Old Chapel, Dukinfield, set within the As I point out in the Appendix on The Trinity, there emerged larger context of the story of the growth and devlopment of from all this conflict not one doctrine of the Trinity, but many. Unitarianism, which we, the present congregation, inherit from the trials and tribulations, the courage, vision and the joy The Trinity is a theological model for expressing the Nature of of our ancestors.