DOCSLIB.ORG

Commissioning Across Government: Review of Evidence

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Commissioning Across Government: Review of Evidence T hird Sector Research Centre Research Report (86) Commissioning across government: review of evidence Tony Bovaird, Helen Dickinson and Kerry Allen August 2012 Project for National Audit Office Revised version of Final Report (submitted 17 May 2010) Research Report Report Research ( 86 ) August 2012 2012 August Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 5 Approach and methods ........................................................................................................................ 6 Scoping phase ......................................................................................................................................... 6 Scanning and analysing the literature ..................................................................................................... 6 Updating government commissioning models......................................................................................... 7 What is commissioning? ...................................................................................................................... 8 Lack of agreed definition ......................................................................................................................... 8 Drivers of interest in commissioning ........................................................................................................ 8 Definitions of commissioning ................................................................................................................. 10 Function – commissioning, procurement, purchasing and contracting ................................................. 10 Means or ends? ..................................................................................................................................... 12 Distinct from provision? ......................................................................................................................... 13 Single or multi-agency? ......................................................................................................................... 15 The role of the citizen ............................................................................................................................ 15 Levels of commissioning ....................................................................................................................... 16 Summary ............................................................................................................................................. 17 Approaches to commissioning .......................................................................................................... 18 Current models of commissioning .................................................................................................... 19 Joint Planning and Commissioning Framework for Children, Young People and Maternity Services (HM Government, March 2006) ............................................................................ 20 The commissioning cycle within the model ............................................................................ 20 What is included within the term ‘commissioning’ in the model ............................................. 20 The performance management regime .................................................................................. 20 Evidence on the performance of the commissioning approach to date ................................. 21 Outcome orientation of the model .......................................................................................... 21 Role of the third sector in the model ...................................................................................... 22 Achieving Better Outcomes: Commissioning in Children’s Services (2009) ......................................... 22 The commissioning cycle within the model ............................................................................ 23 What is included within the term ‘commissioning’ in the model ............................................. 23 Evidence on the performance of the commissioning approach to date ................................. 24 The performance management regime .................................................................................. 24 Outcome orientation of the model .......................................................................................... 24 Role of the third sector in the model ...................................................................................... 24 The National Commissioning Framework (NCF) for young people, April 2010 .................................... 25 Commissioning cycle in the model ......................................................................................... 25 Evidence on the performance of the commissioning approach to date ................................. 26 Performance management regime ........................................................................................ 26 1 Outcome orientation of the model .......................................................................................... 27 Role of the third sector in the model ...................................................................................... 27 DCSF schools commissioning pilot ....................................................................................................... 27 Health reform in England: update and commissioning framework – Annex: the commissioning framework (DH, 2006) ................................................................................ 28 The commissioning cycle within the model ............................................................................ 29 What is included within the term ‘commissioning’ in the model ............................................. 29 The performance management regime .................................................................................. 29 Evidence on the performance of the commissioning approach to date ................................. 30 Outcome orientation of the model .......................................................................................... 30 Role of the third sector in the model ...................................................................................... 30 The Commissioning Framework for Health and Well-being (DH, 2007b) ............................................. 31 The commissioning cycle ....................................................................................................... 31 What is included within the term ‘commissioning’ in the model ............................................. 32 The performance management regime .................................................................................. 32 Evidence on the performance of the commissioning approach to date ................................. 32 Outcome orientation of the model .......................................................................................... 33 Role of the third sector in the model ...................................................................................... 33 World class commissioning (Department of Health, 2007c) ................................................................. 34 The commissioning cycle within the model ............................................................................ 34 What is included within the term ‘commissioning’ in the model ............................................. 34 The performance management regime .................................................................................. 35 Evidence on the performance of the commissioning approach to date ................................. 36 Outcome orientation of the model .......................................................................................... 38 Role of the third sector in the model ...................................................................................... 38 Office of Government Commerce Procurement Model ......................................................................... 38 What is included within the term ‘commissioning’ in the model ............................................. 39 CLG guidance on strategic commissioning ‘Creating strong, safe, prosperous communities’ (CLG, 2008) ......................................................................................................................... 39 The commissioning cycle and what is included within ‘commissioning’ in the model ............................................................................................................................ 40 The performance management regime .................................................................................. 41 Evidence on the performance of the commissioning approach to date ................................. 43 Outcome orientation of the model .......................................................................................... 43 Role of the third sector in the model ...................................................................................... 44 IDeA Model ............................................................................................................................................ 44 The commissioning cycle within the model ............................................................................ 44 What is included within the term ‘commissioning’ in the model ............................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Trafford Park Masterplan Baseline Assessment
    Trafford Park Masterplan Baseline Assessment A Report for the Trafford Economic Alliance By EKOS, CBRE, URBED and WSP August 2008 EKOS Consulting (UK) Ltd 2 Mount Street Manchester M2 5WQ TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES............................................................................................ 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY......................................................................................................... 12 2 INTRODUCTION AND STUDY CONTEXT ..................................................................... 23 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 23 STUDY CONTEXT.................................................................................................................... 23 HISTORICAL CONTEXT ............................................................................................................ 24 STUDY CONTEXT AND MASTERPLAN OBJECTIVES .................................................................... 29 STUDY AREA.......................................................................................................................... 31 BASELINE REPORT OBJECTIVES AND STRUCTURE.................................................................... 31 3 REGENERATION AND PLANNING POLICY REVIEW.................................................. 33 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 33 NATIONAL POLICY
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf Copy of the Report
    City of Manchester Plan 1945, abridged edition This report has been digitised by Joe Blakey and Martin Dodge from the Department of Geography, University of Manchester. The digitisation was supported by the Manchester Statistical Society’s Campion Fund. The copy of the report digitised kindly provided by Richard Brook, Manchester School of Architecture. Permission to digitise and release the report under Creative Commons license was kindly granted by Manchester Libraries, Information and Archives, Manchester City Council. (Email: [email protected]) This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. 20 July 2013. C O NTENTS PR A .. page 2 I. TH D · I N 3 The Purpose of Pla nning- The Pla n in Outline-Ways and Mean II . H F UN I ATION 7 Basic Surveys-Popula tion- The Fa mily Unit J II . II • RAM WORK 10 The Z ning Scheme- Indu trial Planning- Highways JV. T H STR TUR 16 Design fo r Li ving- Ho mes- Types of Dwelling - l ndoor Space- Outdoor Space- School - The eighbo urhood- The District Y. R H SJN 28 Density- The Overspi ll Pro blem- The Redevelopment Programme- The Satellite VJ. 36 Sy tem- Ri vers- A mokeless ity- District H eating YJL. T li E R , IONAL A PJT L 40 Learning, Med icine a nd Lhe rts-The ity Centre-Transport- C ivic Building V LJL. T I-l - OND IT IONS 0 u ss 51 Fu rther Legisla ti o n- Loca l Government- T he Prospect Th e author\· acknowl dgment and thanks ore due to MR.
    [Show full text]
  • De Trafford LOCATION: Navigation House, 1 Furness Quay, Salford, M50 3XZ PROPOSAL
    APPLICATION No: 17/69345/FUL APPLICANT: De Trafford LOCATION: Navigation House, 1 Furness Quay, Salford, M50 3XZ PROPOSAL: Demolition of office building and construction of residential development comprising 421 apartments (C3), 408 sqm of ground floor commercial space (A1, A2, A3, A4, B1, D2) across buildings ranging from 6 to 27 storeys, along with associated access and landscaping works. WARD: Ordsall Description of Site and Surrounding Area This application relates to an approximately 0.5ha site located within Salford Quays, off Furness Quay. The site is occupied by Navigation House which is a 3 storey office building with a pitched roof that stands on the southern part of the site, fronting The Quays road. The remainder of the site, although subdivided into two parcels of land, is in the main hard surfaced and used for car parking. There are landscaped areas with tree planting around the perimeter of the site, with some landscaped areas within the car parks. The site is relatively flat, but is on higher ground than the site to the north and the site rises up to meet The Quays road. All the buildings immediately adjacent to this development are accessed from Furness Quay. This includes the Dock Office and Ontario House, to the east and south east, and to the northwest is Custom and Furness House and the northeast Northern House and Parkside Court. The Dock Office has been redeveloped into apartments and Custom and Furness House have recently been granted planning consent for the redevelopment of the buildings and the wider site for residential use, this is known as the Fortis Quay scheme.
    [Show full text]
  • Organisation Forename Surname Job Title Region Herefordshire County
    Organisation Forename Surname Job Title Region Herefordshire County Council Rachel Andrews Organisational Development and Recruitment AdviserMidlands Wales Fenland District Council Sam Anthony Head of HR & OD South East (Inc London) Gedling Borough Council David Archer Service Manager - Organisational Development Midlands Wales Lincolnshire County Council Deborah Arrand HR Business Partner Midlands Wales Rochdale Borough Council Rosemary Barker TBC North Warwickshire County Council Dawn Barr Manager of OD Midlands Wales North Yorkshire Council Sarah Barron Senior HR Advisor North Sheffield City Council Mark Bennett Director of HR & Customer Services Midlands Wales Tameside Borough Council Tracy Berennand TBC North Manchester City Council Steven berry HROD Specialist (One to Watch Winner) North Financial Ombudsman Service Hannah Bornet Wellbeing Manager South East (Inc London) London Borough of Redbridge Andrea Bradley Human Resources Business Partner South East (Inc London) Cornwall Council Anne Branett Service Lead : Organisation & Workforce DevelopmentSouth West Leeds City Council Emma Browes HR Service Manager North Thurrock Council Andrew Brown Strategic Lead - Pay & Operations South East (Inc London) Fermanagh & Omagh District Council Themla Browne Head of HR & OD North Herefordshire County Council Lucy Campion Learning & OD Advisor Midlands Wales Onesource Hayley Camporese PPMA Rising Star Winner South East (Inc London) Essex County Council Alex Carlton Head of People Insight and Technology South East (Inc London) Lincolnshire County
    [Show full text]
  • Gold Startlist
    GOLD STARTLIST No Name Club INDIVIDUAL TRAMPOLINE Gold TRI Girls 9-10 1 Jemma Macdonald Central Galaxy Coventry Trampoline Club 2 Eleanor Hale Phoenix High Flyers 3 Brooke Wray City of Leeds Trampolining Club 4 Emilia Motiejunaite Phoenix High Flyers 5 Aimee Mcmillan Central Galaxy Coventry Trampoline Club 6 Freya Wicks OLGA Poole 7 Tayla Gerrard OLGA Poole 8 Chloe Annett Kingston Trampoline Academy 9 Jessica Cinnamond City of Liverpool RGC 10 Sophie Graham City of Leeds Trampolining Club 11 Emily Trotter Carlisle Trampoline Club 12 Tilly Hodgkins City of Liverpool RGC 13 Emily Taylor Starlight 14 Holly Baxter Kingston Trampoline Academy Gold TRI Boys 9-10 1 James Keenan Aspire Springers 2 Mike Oleksiyevets (GUEST) Quayside Trampoline & Gym Club 3 Zak Carey Harrogate Gymnastics Club 4 Moise Biock City of Leeds Trampolining Club 5 James Armstrong City of Liverpool RGC 6 Lucas Skelhorn City of Liverpool RGC 7 Billy Stead City of Leeds Trampolining Club Gold TRI Girls 11-12 1 Maisie Linaker-Walsh City of Liverpool RGC 2 Emily Chapman Northamptonshire Trampoline Gymnastics Academy 3 Georgia Smith City of Liverpool RGC 4 India Farrar Northamptonshire Trampoline Gymnastics Academy 5 Carys Verdicchio Rotations 6 Freya Newcombe Northamptonshire Trampoline Gymnastics Academy 7 Lydia Cross Stoke Elite Trampoline Club 8 Eva McCartney City of Liverpool RGC 9 Nyla Evely City of Plymouth Trampoline and Gymnastics Club 10 Hannah Yates Stoke Elite Trampoline Club 11 Caitlyn Turnbull Apollo Trampoline Club 12 Bethan Harries Team Twisters 13 Gabriella
    [Show full text]
  • Salford City Archive Service
    G B 0129 U268 U269 Salford City Archive Service This catalogue was digitised by The National Archives as part of the National Register of Archives digitisation project NRA 33743 The National Archives CITY . OF SALFORD ARTS AND LEISURE DEPARTMENT Archives catalogue U268 Records of Nasmyth, Gaskell and Co. and subsequently Nasmyth, Wilson and Co., 1836-1922, n.d. Deposited! see below. Catalogued! A.N. Cross, Apr., 1987-Feb., 1990. Location! Archives Centre, 658/662 Liverpool Road, Irlam, Manchester, M30 5AD. James Nasmyth (1808-90) was one of the most famous engineers of his time and his role in the engineering industry has been the subject of numerous printed accounts, incl. his Autobiography (edited by Samuel Smiles, 1863). The subject of this role has been treated so thoroughly by Mr. J.A. Cantrell in his book, James Nasmyth and the Bridgewater Foundry;a study of entrepreneurship in the early engineering industry Xbhetham Society, series III, vol. 51, Manchester University Press, 1985), which includes a bibliography, that no additional printed sources are referred to in this introduction. The book is quoted below in this catalogue under the short title James Nasmyth and the Bridgewater Foundry. Mr. Cantrell has also generously made a deposit (ref.iU26$) of his collection compiled during his studies of James Nasmyth to help users of the following "records. The catalogue for this collection should be consulted to see what material this collection contains. The Nasmyth Collection in Salford Local History Library, besides much published material on Nasmyth's life and work, contains copies in the form of microfilm or photocopies of virtually all of the records catalogued: "below as U268.
    [Show full text]
  • Previous Divisional League Winners
    Previous Divisional League Winners Premier Division 1971 Everton 1996 City of Liverpool 1972 COSACSS 1997 City of Liverpool 1973 COSACSS 1998 City of Salford 1974 COSACSS 1999 City of Liverpool 1975 COSACSS 2000 City of Liverpool 1976 Warriors of Warrington 2001 City of Liverpool 1977 Warriors of Warrington 2002 City of Salford 1978 Wythenshawe 2003 City of Salford 1979 COSACSS 2004 City of Salford 1980 Stockport Metropolitan 2005 City of Salford 1981 Stockport Metropolitan 2006 Stockport Metropolitan 1982 Fleetwood 2007 Stockport Metropolitan 1983 Stockport Metropolitan 2008 City of Liverpool 1984 Stockport Metropolitan 2009 City of Liverpool 1985 Stockport Metropolitan 2010 Stockport Metropolitan 1986 Stockport Metropolitan 2011 City of Liverpool 1987 Warriors of Warrington 2012 City of Liverpool 1988 Stockport Metropolitan 2013 City of Salford 1989 Man Utd Salford 2014 Stockport Metropolitan 1990 Warriors of Warrington 2015 City of Liverpool 1991 Warriors of Warrington 2016 Stockport Metropolitan 1992 Man Utd Salford 2017 Stockport Metropolitan 1993 City of Chester 2018 Stockport Metropolitan 1994 City of Liverpool 2019 Stockport Metropolitan 1995 City of Liverpool Division 1 1973 Progress 1997 Oldham Metropolitan 1974 Warriors of Warrington 1998 Ulverston 1975 Blackburn 1999 Bolton 1976 Wythenshawe 2000 Trafford Metropolitan 1977 Wythenshawe 2001 Newcastle 1978 Fleetwood 2002 Leyland Barracudas 1979 Rochdale Aquabears 2003 Stockport Metropolitan 1980 Liverpool Penguin 2004 Kendal 1981 Pioneer 79 2005 Winsford 1982 Piranha 2006 Holywell
    [Show full text]
  • Older People, Regeneration and Health and Wellbeing. Case Study Of
    Older people, regeneration and health and well-being. Case study of Salford Partnership Board for Older People Ryan, J, Williamson, T, Williams, C and Ratcliffe, S Title Older people, regeneration and health and well-being. Case study of Salford Partnership Board for Older People Authors Ryan, J, Williamson, T, Williams, C and Ratcliffe, S Type Monograph URL This version is available at: http://usir.salford.ac.uk/id/eprint/12870/ Published Date 2008 USIR is a digital collection of the research output of the University of Salford. Where copyright permits, full text material held in the repository is made freely available online and can be read, downloaded and copied for non-commercial private study or research purposes. Please check the manuscript for any further copyright restrictions. For more information, including our policy and submission procedure, please contact the Repository Team at: [email protected]. Older People, Regeneration and Health and Well-Being Case Study of Salford Partnership Board for Older People FINAL REPORT A collaboration between MMU, Salford University, UNN and Community Partners in Manchester, Salford and Newcastle upon Tyne Julia Ryan Tracey Williamson Claire Williams Sarah Ratcliffe CONTENTS Contents i-iii Introduction 1 Background and Local 1 Context Methods 12 Study Aim 12 Sample 13 Data Collection 14 Approvals 15 Data Analysis 15 Textual Analysis 15 Qualitative Data Analysis 16 Findings 17 Findings - Citizen 17 Representatives Recruitment 17 Induction 20 Motivation and 20 sustainability Purpose 23 How
    [Show full text]
  • Trafford Park Masterplan Baseline Assessment
    Trafford Park Masterplan Baseline Assessment A Report for the Trafford Economic Alliance By EKOS, CBRE, URBED and WSP August 2008 EKOS Consulting (UK) Ltd 2 Mount Street Manchester M2 5WQ TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES............................................................................................ 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY......................................................................................................... 12 2 INTRODUCTION AND STUDY CONTEXT ..................................................................... 23 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 23 STUDY CONTEXT.................................................................................................................... 23 HISTORICAL CONTEXT ............................................................................................................ 24 STUDY CONTEXT AND MASTERPLAN OBJECTIVES .................................................................... 29 STUDY AREA.......................................................................................................................... 31 BASELINE REPORT OBJECTIVES AND STRUCTURE.................................................................... 31 3 REGENERATION AND PLANNING POLICY REVIEW.................................................. 33 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 33 NATIONAL POLICY
    [Show full text]
  • Public Health Training Scheme, Health Education North West
    Public Health Training Scheme, Health Education North West Salford City Council Training Location Prospectus 1. An Overview of Salfordi Salford is located to the North West of Manchester. With excellent road and public transport links to all parts of the UK, the city is well placed as a visitor and commercial centre. And Manchester International Airport, gateway to over 200 international destinations, is just a few miles away too. The city of Salford covers 37 square miles and the five districts of Salford, Eccles, Worsley, Irlam and Cadishead, and Swinton and Pendlebury. Some 220,000 people are proud to call Salford their home. Salford's closeness to Manchester city centre makes it an important part of the economy and culture that is driving England's north west forward. Salford and Manchester enjoy a unique situation: their connection creates a wealth of opportunities ranging from the potential for business relocation and development to establishing Salford's waterways and watersides as key regional and national visitor attractions and turning the city into a residential area of choice within Greater Manchester. Media City is also located on the landmark redevelopment area of Salford Quays to the south of the City and is now a globally important home for creative, digital and media industries. This 36 acre site is home to BBC North and the University of Salford who have opened a campus for 700 students and staff. Over half the city is made up of green spaces and features forests, nature reserves, mosslands, parklands and picturesque villages. There are hundreds of acres of beautiful park with a variety of wildlife habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • Stream 1 Article Nº 1-006
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE From CONTESTED_CITIES to Global Urban Justice Stream 1 Article nº 1-006 PICTURING GENTRIFICATION REPRESENTATIONS OF URBAN CHANGE, PENDLETON SALFORD JOHN VAN AITKEN JANE BRAKE PICTURING GENTRIFICATION B Representations of Urban Change, Pendleton Salford John van Aitken University of Central Lancashire [email protected] Jane Brake Manchester Metropolitan University [email protected] ABSTRACT The paper examines how visual representations of urban ‘regeneration’ contribute to the gentrification process. It asks can alternative photographic and textual strategies provide a meaningful counter narrative to resist persuasive corporate discourses on ‘urban revitalization’? Focusing on the gentrification of social housing in Pendleton, Salford (Greater Manchester) the paper debates the role of visual imagery in fostering perceptions about urban change by evaluating fieldwork undertaken by the authors in the site since 2004. The paper will question whether such an in-depth longitudinal project and its consequent archive can be utilized as a political tool to highlight the wider processes involved in such regimes of disinvestment and accumulation. Through the combination of photography and site writing in the environment can certain economic and political processes be made legible if not fully visible to highlight causation and effect? KEYWORDS: Salford, creative destruction, photography, site writing, critical witnessing. - 1 - Article nº 1-006 1. PICTURING GENTRIFICATION: REPRESENTATIONS OF URBAN CHANGE, PENDLETON SALFORD 1.1 Starting From The Ground Pear Tree Court is the first of three 14-storey tower blocks in Pendleton scheduled for demolition this summer. We have joined the small group of onlookers watching the tower block being mangled in the jaws of the high level digger.
    [Show full text]
  • Consultation Statement, Item 3A PDF 137 KB
    Salford Local Plan Consultation Statement January 2019 CONTENTS Page Introduction 1 Local Plan – call for sites consultation 3 Local Plan – suggested sites consultation 7 Local Plan – Draft Local Plan consultation 29 Introduction 1.1 This consultation statement has been prepared having regard to the requirements of Regulation 18 of the Town and Country Planning (Local Planning) (England) Regulations 2012. For each stage of consultation on the Salford Local Plan that has been undertaken to date it details: • which bodies and persons were invited to make representations under Regulation 18; • how those bodies and persons were invited to make such representations; and • a summary of the main issues raised by those representations. 1.2 There have been three key stages of consultation on the local plan to date: • Call for sites consultation (8 February – 12 April 2013) • Suggested sites consultation (10 January – 21 March 2014) • Draft Local Plan consultation (8 November 2016 – 16 January 2017) Statement of community involvement 2.1 The city council’s statement of community involvement (SCI) was formally adopted on 20 January 2010. The SCI aims to increase public involvement in the planning process. It sets out who will be involved, by what method and at what point in the process of document production or in the determination of planning applications. It gives more certainty to those wishing to get involved in the planning process. 2.2 The SCI sets out the council’s policy for community engagement in the production of formal planning documents. Below is a summary of the SCI guidance in respect of consultation at the different stages of development plan document (DPD) production: Stage 1 This stage includes defining the objectives for the DPD as well as the framework and scope of the sustainability appraisal (SA).
    [Show full text]