5,620 Sf Available

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

63 CHATHAM STREET 5,620 SF BOSTON, MA AVAILABLE » Situated in the Heart of Boston’s booming Central Business District » Prominent transit oriented address » Immediate access to Faneuil Hall FLOOR PLANS 63 CHATHAM STREET BOSTON, MA FLOOR 4|2,120 SF REF. DN KITCHENETTE UTILITY 5'-10" x 7'-8" 5'-6" x 7'-8" UP BATH 7'-9" x 5'-0" CL. 24'-1" x 31' BATH 7'-9" x 5'-0" 7'-5" Floor-to-Ceiling Height 11'-9" x 22'-10" UP DN ELEVATOR 6'-10" x 5'-0" 7'-0" x 10'-4" 9'-6" x 10'-4" 9'-5" x 10'-4" 14'-4" x 10'-4" 6'-10" x 5'-0" 63 Chatham Street, Boston, MA - 4th Floor Plan - [2,120 sqft Total Gross Area] Disclaimer: Floor Plan measurements are approximate and are for illustrative purposes only. While we do not doubt the floor plans accuracy, we make no gurantee, warranty, or representation as to the accuracy and completness of the plan. FLOOR 5|2,120 SF FLOOR 6|1,380 SF DN REF. DN UTILITY 4'-3" x 7'-8" DW. KITCHENETTE UP 7'-2" x 8'-8" BATH 7'-9" x 5'-0" BATH 7'-9" x 6'-10" 24'-1" x 41'-8" 7'-11" Floor-to-Ceiling Height BATH 7'-9" x 5'-0" 7'-9" x 10'-11" DN 24'-1" x 22'-5" 16'-0" x 22'-5" 11'-9" x 32'-7" 7'-6" Floor-to-Ceiling Height 7'-8" Floor-to-Ceiling Height 7'-10" Floor-to-Ceiling Height UP ELEVATOR DN 9'-0" x 15'-0" UP OPEN TO BELOW OPEN TO BELOW STORAGE 63 Chatham Street, Boston, MA - 5th Floor Plan - [2,120 sqft Total Gross Area] 63 Chatham Street, Boston, MA - 6th Floor Plan - [1,380 sqft Total Gross Area] Disclaimer: Floor Plan measurements are approximate and are for illustrative purposes only. While we do not doubt the floor plans accuracy, we make no gurantee, warranty, or representation as to the accuracy and completness of the plan. Disclaimer: Floor Plan measurements are approximate and are for illustrative purposes only. While we do not doubt the floor plans accuracy, we make no gurantee, warranty, or representation as to the accuracy and completness of the plan. *Floors 5 & 6 must be leased together 63 CHATHAM STREET BOSTON, MA PROPERTY HIGHLIGHTS BUILDING 14,255 SF AVAILABLE SPACE Floor 4: 2,120 SF Floor 5: 2,120 SF Floor 6: 1,380 SF (Floors 5&6 must be leased together) AVAILABLE SPACE April 2020 CONSTRUCTION Brick and Beam YEAR BUILT 1899 FLOORS 6 93 LOCATION SNAPSHOT North Station NORTH END locationKENDALL SQUARE overview < 15 minute drive 4 Minute drive to I-93 10 Minute drive to Logan Airport Haymarket 2 Minute drive to the Seaport Government Center Charles Bowdoin 6 MGH BEACON HILL State Aquarium 93 5 Minute walk to: Street Park Street Aquarium Station (Blue Line) State Station (Blue/Orange Line) Downtown Crossing BACK BAY < 7 minute drive 10 Minute drive to Logan Airport Boylston South Copley Station 93 SEAPORT Arlington DISTRICT Chinatown 90 RYAN HEALY DAN CARUCCI 617-330-8017 617-330-8109 [email protected] [email protected] COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL | 160 Federal Street | Boston, MA 02110 | 617 330 8000 | colliers.com/boston Copyright © 2021 Colliers International. Information herein has been obtained from sources deemed reliable, however its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The user is required to conduct their own due diligence and verification..

Copy Link

Recommended publications

IMC/BC/RM/SA FY08 Annual Meeting Boston, Massachusetts ~ April 15-17, 2008
IMC/BC/RM/SA FY08 Annual Meeting Boston, Massachusetts ~ April 15-17, 2008 Pre-Registration In addition to registering on Trainex, please go to http://r1notes3/OSRR/Meeting.nsf/Agenda?OpenForm to complete the additional meeting registration form. This will assist the Boston team with planning the meeting activities. Login with your Notes ID and password. Meeting Location The IMC/CB/RM/SA FY 08 Annual Meeting is being held at the John F. Kennedy Federal Building located at Government Center. 55 New Sudbury Street Boston, MA 02203 Room E275-C (2nd floor of the low-rise portion of the building) GSA Mgr’s. Number: 617-565-1086 The meeting is located just about where this arrow is. There are employee entrances on both sides of the low rise depending from which direction/hotel you are traveling. Any US Government ID should work at employee entrances. However, at the EPA Region 1 offices, all non-EPA Region 1 employees must pass through security as visitors. The address is: One Congress Street. Climate The average temperature in Boston during April is 56 degrees. Temperatures range from the low 40s to mid 50s. If you wish to check for an up-to-date, five-day weather forecast before leaving for the meeting, click on http://weather.yahoo.com/forecast/USMA0045.html . Bringing a coat is advisable. Transportation Boston’s Logan International Airport is approximately 2.5 miles (15-20 minutes) from Government Center and hotel areas. Taxi -- $20 - $25 Subway -- $1.70/trip See http://www.mbta.com for more details. Take free Massport Bus (either 22, 33, or 55) from your terminal to the Subway Airport Station (Blue Line).
[Show full text]
The Land Use and Rapid Transportation Nexus in the Massachusetts Bay Jennifer Folz Clemson University, [email protected]
Clemson University TigerPrints All Theses Theses 5-2013 The Land Use and Rapid Transportation Nexus in the Massachusetts Bay Jennifer Folz Clemson University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses Part of the Transportation Commons Recommended Citation Folz, Jennifer, "The Land Use and Rapid Transportation Nexus in the Massachusetts aB y" (2013). All Theses. 1597. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses/1597 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses at TigerPrints. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Theses by an authorized administrator of TigerPrints. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Land Use and Rapid Transportation Nexus in the Massachusetts Bay _______________________________________________________ A Thesis Presented to the Graduate School of Clemson University _______________________________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of City and Regional Planning _______________________________________________________ by Jennifer Anne Folz May 2013 _______________________________________________________ Accepted by: Dr. Eric Morris, Committee Chair Dr. Barry Nocks Dr. Tim Green ABSTRACT Throughout the last several decades a growing emphasis has been placed on creating sustainable places through innovative planning practices. Urban designers, researchers, planners, and policy makers have continuously examined the land use transportation nexus in order to develop methods to efficiently guide transit funding to encourage alternate modes of travel. The United States is in the middle of a paradigm shift in generational behaviors. Baby boomers are downsizing and according to the Urban Land Institute are looking for more location-efficient residences. Similarly, Generation Y’s attitudes are focused on living and working in close proximity.
[Show full text]
Federal Transit Administration Region V Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI)
Federal Transit Administration Region V RED-PURPLE BYPASS PROJECT IN THE CITY OF CHICAGO, ILLINOIS Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) A. Introduction This document provides the basis for a determination by the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT), Federal Transit Administration (FTA), of a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) for the Red‐Purple Bypass Project. This determination is made in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, 42 United States Code (U.S.C.) § 4332(2)(c); FTA’s implementing procedures (23 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] § 771.121); Section 4(f) of the USDOT Act of 1966, 49 U.S.C. § 303; and the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, 54 U.S.C. § 300101 et seq. FTA, as the federal lead agency, and Chicago Transit Authority (CTA), as the local project sponsor, jointly prepared the Environmental Assessment (EA) and Section 4(f) Evaluation to describe potential impacts on the human and natural environment and historic integrity that may result from the Red‐Purple Bypass Project on the CTA Red and Purple lines. The EA was prepared pursuant to 23 CFR § 771.119 and issued by FTA on May 19, 2015. This FONSI is prepared by FTA pursuant to 23 CFR § 771.121., and incorporates by reference the EA and other cited documentation. B. Existing Conditions Figure 1 is a map of the project limits. The Red‐Purple Bypass Project area is approximately 5 miles north of downtown Chicago, in the Lakeview community area. The project area, just north of Belmont station, includes the existing junction where three CTA rail lines, the Red, Purple, and Brown lines, converge at an existing flat junction (known as Clark Junction), mainline Red and Purple line tracks extend north to Newport and Cornelia Avenues, and the Brown Line branch extends west to approximately Seminary Avenue.
[Show full text]
TCRP Report 102 – Transit-Oriented
TRANSIT COOPERATIVE RESEARCH TCRP PROGRAM REPORT 102 Transit-Oriented Sponsored by Development in the the Federal United States: Transit Administration Experiences, Challenges, and Prospects TCRP OVERSIGHT AND PROJECT TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE 2004 (Membership as of January 2004) SELECTION COMMITTEE (as of January 2004) OFFICERS CHAIR Chair: Michael S. Townes, President and CEO, Hampton Roads Transit, Hampton, VA J. BARRY BARKER Vice Chair: Joseph H. Boardman, Commissioner, New York State DOT Transit Authority of River City Executive Director: Robert E. Skinner, Jr., Transportation Research Board MEMBERS MEMBERS KAREN ANTION MICHAEL W. BEHRENS, Executive Director, Texas DOT Karen Antion Consulting SARAH C. CAMPBELL, President, TransManagement, Inc., Washington, DC GORDON AOYAGI Montgomery County Government E. DEAN CARLSON, Director, Carlson Associates, Topeka, KS RONALD L. BARNES JOHN L. CRAIG, Director, Nebraska Department of Roads Central Ohio Transit Authority DOUGLAS G. DUNCAN, President and CEO, FedEx Freight, Memphis, TN LINDA J. BOHLINGER GENEVIEVE GIULIANO, Director, Metrans Transportation Center and Professor, School of Policy, HNTB Corp. Planning, and Development, USC, Los Angeles ANDREW BONDS, JR. BERNARD S. GROSECLOSE, JR., President and CEO, South Carolina State Ports Authority Parsons Transportation Group, Inc. SUSAN HANSON, Landry University Prof. of Geography, Graduate School of Geography, Clark University JENNIFER L. DORN JAMES R. HERTWIG, President, Landstar Logistics, Inc., Jacksonville, FL FTA HENRY L. HUNGERBEELER, Director, Missouri DOT NATHANIEL P. FORD, SR. ADIB K. KANAFANI, Cahill Professor of Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley Metropolitan Atlanta RTA RONALD F. KIRBY, Director of Transportation Planning, Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments CONSTANCE GARBER HERBERT S. LEVINSON, Principal, Herbert S. Levinson Transportation Consultant, New Haven, CT York County Community Action Corp.
[Show full text]
South County Commuter Rail Operations Plan
SOUTH COUNTY COMMUTER RAIL SERVICE OPERATIONS PLAN PROVIDENCE TO WESTERLY, RI JULY 2001 RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION South County Commuter Rail Service Rhode Island Department of Transportation Operations Plan Providence to Westerly, RI Prepared by: Edwards and Kelcey, Inc 95 Cedar Street, Suite 101 Providence, RI 02903 In Association With: Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade and Douglas, Inc One State Street Providence, RI 02908 July 2001 RIDOT South County Commuter Rail TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY......................................................... ES-1 Introduction ............................................................... ES-1 SECTION 1.0 OPERATIONS PLAN..................................................1-1 1.1 Operational Overview............................................1-1 1.2 Facilities Overview ..............................................1-7 1.3 Introduction to Service Alternatives ................................1-12 1.4 Stand-Alone Commuter Service (Alternative 1) ......................1-14 1.5 CDOT Service Extension (Alternative 2)............................1-18 1.6 MBTA Service Extension (Alternative 3) ...........................1-19 SECTION 2.0 SERVICE OPTIONS, OPERATING ASSUMPTIONS AND COSTS .............2-1 2.1 Introduction ....................................................2-1 2.2 Alternatives 1A and 1B: Rhode Island DOT Stand-Alone Service (Pawtucket or Westerly Layover Facility) ........................................2-2 2.3 Alternative 2: Shore Line East Service Extension......................2-5
[Show full text]
Transit-Focused Development
T R A N S I T C O O P E R A T I V E R E S E A R C H P R O G R A M SPONSORED BY The Federal Transit Administration TCRP Synthesis 20 Transit-Focused Development A Synthesis of Transit Practice Transportation Research Board National Research Council TCRP OVERSIGHT AND PROJECT TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE 1997 SELECTION COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN OFFICERS MICHAEL S. TOWNES Peninsula Transportation District Chair: JAMES W. VAN LOBEN SELS, Director, California Department of Transportation Commission Vice Chair: DAVID N. WORMLEY, Dean of Engineering, Pennsylvania State University Executive Director: ROBERT E. SKINNER. JR, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council MEMBERS SHARON D. BANKS MEMBERS AC Transit LEE BARNES EDWARD H. ARNOLD, President & CEO, Arnold Industries, Inc Barwood, Inc SHARON D. BANKS, General Manager, Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District, Oakland, California GERALD L. BLAIR BRIAN J. L. BERRY, Lloyd Viel Berkner Regental Professor, Bruton Center for Development Studies, Indiana County Transit Authority University of Texas at Dallas SHIRLEY A. DELIBERO LILLIAN C. BORRONE, Director, Port Department, The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (Past New Jersey Transit Corporation Chair, 1995) ROD J. DIRIDON DAVID BURWELL, President, Rails-to-Trails Conservancy International Institute for Surface E. DEAN CARLSON, Secretary, Kansas Department of Transportation Transportation Policy Study JAMES N. DENN, Commissioner, Minnesota Department of Transportation SANDRA DRAGGOO JOHN W. FISHER, Director, ATLSS Engineering Research Center, Lehigh University CATA DENNIS J. FITZGERALD, Executive Director, Capital District Transportation Authority LOUIS J. GAMBACCINI DAVID R. GOODE, Chairman, President, and CEO, Norfolk Southern Corporation SEPTA DELON HAMPTON, Chairman & CEO, Delon Hampton & Associates DELON HAMPTON LESTER A.
[Show full text]
Subway Spaces As Public Places: Politics and Perceptions of Boston's T
Subway Spaces as Public Places: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE Politics and Perceptions of Boston's T OF TEC HNO10LOGY by JUN 3 0 2011 Holly Bellocchio Durso Submitted to the Department of Urban Studies and Planning ARCHIVES in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degrees of Bachelor of Science in Planning and Master in City Planning at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY June 2011 @2011 Holly Bellocchio Durso. All Rights Reserved. The author hereby grants to MIT the permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of the thesis document in whole or in part. Author C Department of Urban Studies and Planning May 19, 2011 Certified by Associate Professor Annette M. Kim Department of Urban Studies and Planning Thesis Supervisor Accepted by Professor Joseph Ferreira Chair, MCP Committee r Department of Urban Studies and Planning Subway Spaces as Public Places: Politics and Perceptions of Boston's T by Holly Bellocchio Durso Submitted to the Department of Urban Studies and Planning on May 19, 2011 in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degrees of Bachelor of Science in Planning and Master in City Planning ABSTRACT Subways play crucial transportation roles in our cities, but they also act as unique public spaces, distinguished by specific design characteristics, governed by powerful state-run institutions, and subject to intense public scrutiny and social debate. This thesis takes the case of the United States' oldest subway system-Boston's T-and explores how and why its spaces and regulations over their appropriate use have changed over time in response to public perceptions, political battles, and broader social forces.
[Show full text]
Analysis of the Short-Turning Strategy on High-Frequency Transit Lines Gordon T. Coor
Analysis of the Short-Turning Strategy on High-Frequency Transit Lines by Gordon T. Coor B.A. Environment, Technology, and Society Clark University, 1988 SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL AND ENVIROMENTAL ENGINEERING IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN TRANSPORTATION AT THE MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY FEBRUARY 1997 © 1997 Massachusetts Institute of Technology All rights reserved Signature of Author: - Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering October 23, 1996 Certified by: %F ... -- Nigel H. M. Wilson Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering S Thesis Supervisor Accepted by: Joseph M. Sussman Chairman, Departmental Committee on Graduate Studies GF TECHiNOL '' ; JAN 2 9 1997 L1BRAFiiES Analysis of the Short-Turning Strategy on High-Frequency Transit Lines by Gordon T. Coor Submitted to the department of Civil and Environmental Engineering on October 23, 1996 in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Transportation Abstract Short-turning is a real-time control intervention in which a transit vehicle is removed from service at some point short of its destination and returned to service in the opposite direction. By skipping a section of its route in this way, the transit vehicle can recover lost time and fill a gap in service. In this thesis, a model is developed to simulate short-turning on a rail transit line with high-frequency service. In this model train dwell times, and hence headways, vary as a function of total passenger boardings and alightings. Passenger loads are dependent on vehicle headways. Inputs to this model include passenger arrival rates and passenger alighting proportions for each station on the line, average interstation running times, and initial sequences of train headways.
[Show full text]
Ridership and Service Statistics
Ridership and Service Statistics Thirteenth Edition 2010 Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority BLANK PAGE YEAR 2010, THIRTEENTH EDITION - CONTENTS Chapter 1 - Introduction About This Book 1.1 Service and Infrastructure Profile 1. 2-7 Accessibility of Subway and Commuter Rail Stations 1. 8-9 Chapter 2 - Subway Service Operations Overview and Statistical Highlights 2.1 Rapid Transit System "Spider" Map With Typical Weekday Station Entries 2.2 Green Line Route Map 2.3 Ranked Station Entires Downtown Transfers 2.4 Rapid Transit Downtown Transfers Map 2.5 Subway Operations Line Statistics 2.6 Subway Operations Fleet Roster 2.7 Scheduled Round Trips and Train Miles by Schedule Rating 2.8 Rapid Transit Schedule and Span of Service Summary 2.9 Red Line Station Entries 2. 10 Red Line Track Schematic Cambridge-Dorchester Segment 2. 11 Red Line Track Schematic South Shore Segment 2. 12 Red Line Route Description 2. 13 Red Line Location of Stations 2. 14 Mattapan-Ashmont Trolley: Ridership, Route Description, Station Locations 2. 15 Mattapan-Ashmont High Speed Trolley Track Schematic 2. 16 Green Line Subway Station Entries and Surface Ridership 2. 17-18 Green Line Track Schematic 2. 19 Green Line Route Description 2. 20 Green Line Location of Stations 2. 21 Orange Line Station Entries 2. 22 Orange Line Track Schematic 2. 23 Orange Line Route Description 2. 24 Orange Line Location of Stations 2. 25 Blue Line Station Entries 2. 26 Blue Line Track Schematic 2. 27 Blue Line Route Description 2. 28 Blue Line Location of Stations 2. 25 Equipment at Stations (Red/Green, Orange/Blue Lines) 2.
[Show full text]
HOW DOES TRANSPORTATION AFFORDABILITY VARY AMONG TODS, TADS, and OTHER AREAS? Final Report
HOW DOES TRANSPORTATION AFFORDABILITY VARY AMONG TODS, TADS, AND OTHER AREAS? Final Report NITC-RR-859 by Brenda Scheer (PI) Reid Ewing Keunhyun Park Shabnam Sifat Ara Khan University of Utah for National Institute for Transportation and Communities (NITC) P.O. Box 751 Portland, OR 97207 August 2017 Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. NITC-RR-859 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date August 2017 How does transportation affordability vary among TODs, TADs, and other areas? 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Brenda Scheer (PI), Reid Ewing, Keunhyun Park, and Shabnam Sifat Ara Khan 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Department of City & Metropolitan Planning 11. Contract or Grant No. University of Utah NITC-UU-08 375 South 1530, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Final Report National Institute for Transportation and Communities (NITC) 14. Sponsoring Agency Code P.O. Box 751 Portland, Oregon 97207 15. Supplementary Notes 16. Abstract Transit-oriented development (TOD) has gained popularity worldwide as a sustainable form of urbanism; it concentrates development near a transit station so as to reduce auto-dependency and increase ridership. Existing travel behavior studies in the context of TOD, however, are limited in terms of small sample size, inconsistent TOD classification methods, and failure to control for residential self-selection. Thus, this study has three research questions. First, how can we distinguish between Transit-oriented development (TOD) and Transit-adjacent development (TAD)? Second, how do travel behaviors vary between TODs and TADs? Third, how does transportation affordability vary between TODs and TADs? This study utilizes cluster analysis to classify station area types and propensity score matching to control residential self-selection.
[Show full text]
MBTA 2009 Blue Book
Ridership and Service Statistics Twelfth Edition 2009 Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority BLANK PAGE YEAR 2009, TWELFTH EDITION - CONTENTS Chapter 1 - Introduction About This Book 1 . 1 Service and Infrastructure Profile 1 . 2-7 Accessibility of Subway and Commuter Rail Stations 1 . 8-9 Chapter 2 - Subway Service Operations Overview and Statistical Highlights 2 . 1 Rapid Transit System "Spider" Map With Typical Weekday Station Entries 2 . 2 Green Line Route Map 2 . 3 Ranked Station Entires Downtown Transfers 2 . 4 Rapid Transit Downtown Transfers Map 2 . 5 Subway Operations Line Statistics 2 . 6 Subway Operations Fleet Roster 2 . 7 Scheduled Round Trips and Train Miles by Schedule Rating 2 . 8 Rapid Transit Schedule and Span of Service Summary 2 . 9 Red Line Station Entries 2 . 10 Red Line Track Schematic Cambridge-Dorchester Segment 2 . 11 Red Line Track Schematic South Shore Segment 2 . 12 Red Line Route Description 2 . 13 Red Line Location of Stations 2 . 14 Mattapan-Ashmont Trolley: Ridership, Route Description, Station Locations 2 . 15 Mattapan-Ashmont High Speed Trolley Track Schematic 2 . 16 Green Line Subway Station Entries and Surface Ridership 2 . 17-18 Green Line Track Schematic 2 . 19 Green Line Route Description 2 . 20 Green Line Location of Stations 2 . 21 Orange Line Station Entries 2 . 22 Orange Line Track Schematic 2 . 23 Orange Line Route Description 2 . 24 Orange Line Location of Stations 2 . 25 Blue Line Station Entries 2 . 26 Blue Line Track Schematic 2 . 27 Blue Line Route Description 2 . 28 Blue Line Location of Stations 2 . 25 Equipment at Stations (Red/Green, Orange/Blue Lines) 2 .
[Show full text]
LAN for PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AREA NO. 33 COMMONWEALTH CENTER
BRA Approva 1 : June 29, 1989 ZC Approva 1 : July 27, 1989 effective: August 17, 1989 DEVELOPMENT PLAN and DEVELOPMENT IMPACT PROJECT ?LAN for PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AREA NO. 33 COMMONWEALTH CENTER June 15, 1989 Developer: Commonwealth Center Limited Partnership, a lim- ited partnership formed under the laws of the State of Delaware (the "Developer") by: F.D. Rich Company of Boston, Inc. ("FDR"), a Connecticut corporation, as a general partner; and Casa Development, Inc. ( "Casa"), a Mass:chusetts corporation which is a wholly owned subsidiary of A.W. Perry, Inc. ("'Perry"). as a general partn-er, to develop the Commonwealth Center Project (the "Project"). The business address, tele- phone number and designated contact for the Developer are: c/o F.D. Rich Company of Boston, Inc., 99 Summer Street - Suite 1800. Boston, Massachusetts 02110-1200, Telephone: 617 737-8300, Designated Contact: Alexander C. Twining. The F.D. Rich Company, headquartered in Stamford, Connecticut, specializes in investment deve l c1pment, leasing and asset management services for projects throughout the United States. Founded in 1921 as a local building contractor, F.D. Rich was constructing projects across the cot.~lry by the 1950's. F.D. Rich expanded into real estate development in 1960 ~lth :he six-building, 500,000 square foot High Ridge Park :Efice park in North Stamford. The company has developed more :han _ ~illicn square feet of Jffice space, one million square ~eet :f retail space, 510 hotel rooms and more than 14,000 res idential units. Current projects incorporate office, retail, residential, hotel and cultural uses. :n 1960, F.D.
[Show full text]