Heterophylly: Phenotypic Plasticity of Leaf Shape in Aquatic and Amphibious Plants

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Heterophylly: Phenotypic Plasticity of Leaf Shape in Aquatic and Amphibious Plants plants Review Heterophylly: Phenotypic Plasticity of Leaf Shape in Aquatic and Amphibious Plants 1, 1, 1 2,3, Gaojie Li y, Shiqi Hu y, Hongwei Hou and Seisuke Kimura * 1 The State Key Laboratory of Freshwater Ecology and Biotechnology, The Key Laboratory of Aquatic Biodiversity and Conservation of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430072, Hubei, China; [email protected] (G.L.); [email protected] (S.H.); [email protected] (H.H.) 2 Faculty of Life Sciences, Kyoto Sangyo University, Kamigamo-motoyama, Kita-ku, Kyoto-shi, Kyoto 603-8555, Japan 3 Center for Ecological Evolutionary Developmental Biology, Kyoto Sangyo University, Kamigamo-motoyama, Kita-ku, Kyoto-shi, Kyoto 603-8555, Japan * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +81-75-705-3113 These authors contributed equally to this work. y Received: 21 August 2019; Accepted: 14 October 2019; Published: 16 October 2019 Abstract: Leaves show great diversity in shape, size, and color in nature. Interestingly, many plant species have the ability to alter their leaf shape in response to their surrounding environment. This phenomenon is termed heterophylly, and is thought to be an adaptive feature to environmental heterogeneity in many cases. Heterophylly is widespread among land plants, and is especially dominant in aquatic and amphibious plants. Revealing the mechanisms underlying heterophylly would provide valuable insight into the interaction between environmental conditions and plant development. Here, we review the history and recent progress of research on heterophylly in aquatic and amphibious plants. Keywords: heterophylly; submergence; environment; adaptation; molecular mechanisms 1. What is Heterophylly? Plants display amazing morphological diversity of leaves. The leaves of some plant species can undergo considerable form alteration in response to environmental conditions via a process called heterophylly (Figure1)[ 1]. Heterophylly is a type of phenotypic plasticity that is widespread among plants. Heterophyllous plants produce dramatic, often abrupt changes in leaf morphology in response to environmental factors [1]. Interestingly, most known examples of heterophylly are found in aquatic and amphibious plants, in which submerged leaves are often dissected compared with simple terrestrial leaves [2] (Table 1). Because these plants are sometimes submerged during flooding, they have evolved to thrive and grow both under water and terrestrial conditions. Such plants often display heterophylly, which is generally regarded as a morphological process allowing adaptation to a capricious environment [2,3]. Leaf shapes are related to their function, as submerged leaves are thin, narrow, and lack cuticles and stomata, whereas terrestrial leaves are thicker, expanded, and cutinized with stomata [2,3]. An example is the narrow leaves of amphibious plants located along riverbanks where flooding always occurs. Narrow leaves are less efficient at absorbing sunlight than those that have wider blades; however, they can withstand the destructive force of water flow. Narrow or deeply serrated/lobed leaves are also present in aquatic plants, and may provide for similar interactions with the surrounding environment, including factors beyond the submerged conditions for mineral Plants 2019, 8, 420; doi:10.3390/plants8100420 www.mdpi.com/journal/plants Plants 2019, 8, x FOR PEER REVIEW 2 of 14 Plants 2019, 8, 420 2 of 13 for mineral nutrient and CO2 uptake. These narrow or dissected leaf blade formations are likely an adaptation to underwater conditions. nutrient and CO2 uptake. These narrow or dissected leaf blade formations are likely an adaptation to underwater conditions. Figure 1. Heterophylly of amphibious plant, North American lake cress, Rorippa aquatica (Brassicaceae). North American lake cress shows distinct heterophylly between submerged and terrestrialFigure 1. conditions.Heterophylly Leaf of shape amphibious alternation plant, is also North induced American by changes lake incress, ambient Rorippa temperature. aquatica Bars,(Brassicaceae 1cm. ). North American lake cress shows distinct heterophylly between submerged and terrestrial conditions. Leaf shape alternation is also induced by changes in ambient temperature. Bars, The1cm. original definition of heterophylly was not strictly linked to the environment, and lacked a clear distinction from other similar processes [1]. However, heterophylly was recently defined as leaf form alterationThe original in responsedefinition to of environmental heterophylly was conditions, not strictly unlike linked heteroblasty to the environment, and anisophylly and lacked [1,4–6]. a Heteroblastyclear distinction was from described other as similar changes processes in leaf shape [1]. However, during growth heterophylly development, was recently but does defined not include as leaf morphologicalform alteration changes in response induced to environmental by environmental conditions, factors unlike [1,5 ].heteroblasty Similarly, and anisophylly anisophylly is usually [1,4–6]. coupledHeteroblasty with asymmetry was described and phyllotaxis as changes of in leaves leaf andshape stems, during and growth also does development, not include morphological but does not changesinclude inducedmorphological by environmental changes induced factors [by7]. environmental factors [1,5]. Similarly, anisophylly is usuallyConsidering coupled thewith distinct asymmetry differences and phyllotaxis in leaf shape of leaves between and aerial stems, and and submerged also does conditions,not include elucidatingmorphological the mechanisms changes induced underlying by environmental heterophylly factors in aquatic [7]. and amphibious plants would provide valuableConsidering insight into the the distinct interaction differences between in the leaf environment shape between and plantaerial development.and submerged conditions, elucidating the mechanisms underlying heterophylly in aquatic and amphibious plants would 2.provide History valuable of Research insight on into Heterophylly the interaction between the environment and plant development. Heterophylly is observed in many evolutionary diverse aquatic and amphibious plant species including2. History those of Research belonging on Heterophylly to the Nymphaeales, Ranunculales, Saxifragales, Myrtales, Brassicales, Lamiales,Heterophylly and many is other observed orders in [ 8many–16] (Table evolutionary1). There diverse are remarkable aquatic and morphological amphibious di plantfferences species in theseincluding heterophyllous those belonging plants between to the Nymphaeales, submerged and Ranunculales, terrestrial environments. Saxifragales, Leaves Myrtales, under submergedBrassicales, conditionsLamiales, tendand many to have other a thin, orders filamentous, [8–16] (Table or linear 1). T shape,here are degraded remarkable vascular morphological structure, and differences the leaves in usuallythese heterophyllous lack stomata cells, plant whichs between means plantssubmerged must directly and terrestrial absorb nutrients environments. and exchange Leaves gas under from watersubmerged [2,3,17 ,conditions18]. Here, wetend review to have the a existingthin, filamentous knowledge, or of linear heterophylly shape, degraded in different vascular species, structure with a , particularand the leaves focus onusually the role lack of phytohormonesstomata cells, which and environmental means plants factorsmust directly in regulating absorb heterophylly, nutrients and to gainexchang valuablee gas insight from water into this [2,3,1 phenomenon.7,18]. Here, we review the existing knowledge of heterophylly in different species, with a particular focus on the role of phytohormones and environmental factors in regulating heterophylly, to gain valuable insight into this phenomenon. Plants 2019, 8, 420 3 of 13 Table 1. Representative heterophyllous plants and treatments that can induce heterophylly. Species Family Common Name Treatments References Alisma graminifolium Alismataceae - light [19] two-headed ABA, GA, temperature, osmotic Callitriche heterophylla Callitrichaceae [11,20,21] water-starwort stress narrowleaf Callitriche intermedia Callitrichaceae osmotic stress, temperature [22,23] water-starwort Callitriche stagnalis Callitrichaceae pond water starwort GA [20,21] ABA, temperature, light intensity, Hippuris vulgaris Hippuridaceae common mare’s tail [5,9,24,25] R/FR ratio, osmotic stress ABA, ethylene, GA, humidity, Hygrophila difformis Acanthaceae Water-Wisteria [26,27] temperature Ilex aquifolium Aquifoliaceae Common holly mammalian browsing [28] piedmont Ludwigia arcuata Onagraceae ABA, ethylene, temperature [6,14,29,30] primrose-willow Marsilea quadrifolia Marsileaceae European water clover ABA, blue light, CO2 [12,13] Marsilea vestita Marsileaceae hairy water clover CO2, light intnsity, light quality [31,32] red stemmed parrot Myriophyllum brasiliense Haloragaceae CO [33] feather 2 CO , sediment type and water Nuphar variegate Nymphaeaceae yellow water lily 2 [34] depth Nuphar lutea Nymphaeaceae yellow pond-lily water depth [16] Potamogeton nodosus Potamogetonaceae longleaf pondweed ABA [4] Potamogeton alpinus Potamogetonaceae - water flow [35] submerged or floating condition, Potamogeton octandrus Potamogetonaceae - [36] development ABA, GA, light intensity, Proserpinaca palustris Haloragidaceae marsh mermaid-weed humidity, osmotic stress, [17,37,38] photoperiod intermediate Proserpinaca intermedia Haloragidaceae photoperiod
Recommended publications
  • The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts
    The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: A County Checklist • First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Somers Bruce Sorrie and Paul Connolly, Bryan Cullina, Melissa Dow Revision • First A County Checklist Plants of Massachusetts: Vascular The A County Checklist First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Massachusetts Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program The Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program (NHESP), part of the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, is one of the programs forming the Natural Heritage network. NHESP is responsible for the conservation and protection of hundreds of species that are not hunted, fished, trapped, or commercially harvested in the state. The Program's highest priority is protecting the 176 species of vertebrate and invertebrate animals and 259 species of native plants that are officially listed as Endangered, Threatened or of Special Concern in Massachusetts. Endangered species conservation in Massachusetts depends on you! A major source of funding for the protection of rare and endangered species comes from voluntary donations on state income tax forms. Contributions go to the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Fund, which provides a portion of the operating budget for the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program. NHESP protects rare species through biological inventory,
    [Show full text]
  • Endosamara Racemosa (Roxb.) Geesink and Callerya Vasta (Kosterm.) Schot
    Taiwania, 48(2): 118-128, 2003 Two New Members of the Callerya Group (Fabaceae) Based on Phylogenetic Analysis of rbcL Sequences: Endosamara racemosa (Roxb.) Geesink and Callerya vasta (Kosterm.) Schot (1,3) (1,2) Jer-Ming Hu and Shih-Pai Chang (Manuscript received 2 May, 2003; accepted 29 May, 2003) ABSTRACT: Two new members of Callerya group in Fabaceae, Endosamara racemosa (Roxb.) Geesink and Callerya vasta (Kosterm.) Schot, are identified based on phylogenetic analyses of chloroplast rbcL sequences. These taxa joined with other previously identified taxa in the Callerya group: Afgekia, Callerya, and Wisteria. These genera are resolved as a basal subclade in the Inverted Repeat Lacking Clade (IRLC), which is a large legume group that includes many temperate and herbaceous legumes in the subfamily Papilionoideae, such as Astragalus, Medicago and Pisum, and is not close to other Millettieae. Endosamara is sister to Millettia japonica (Siebold & Zucc.) A. Gray, but only weakly linked with Wisteria and Afgekia. KEY WORDS: Endosamara, Callerya, Millettieae, Millettia, rbcL, Phylogenetic analysis. INTRODUCTION Recent molecular phylogenetic studies of the tribe Millettieae have revealed that the tribe is polyphyletic and several taxa are needed to be segregated from the core Millettieae group. One of the major segregates from Millettieae is the Callerya group, comprising species from Callerya, Wisteria, Afgekia, and Millettia japonica (Siebold & Zucc.) A. Gray. The group is considered to be part of the Inverted-Repeat-Lacking Clade (IRLC; Wojciechowski et al., 1999) including many temperate herbaceous legumes. Such result is consistent and supported by chloroplast inverted repeat surveys (Lavin et al., 1990; Liston, 1995) and phylogenetic studies of the phytochrome gene family (Lavin et al., 1998), chloroplast rbcL (Doyle et al., 1997; Kajita et al., 2001), trnK/matK (Hu et al., 2000), and nuclear ribosomal ITS regions (Hu et al., 2002).
    [Show full text]
  • Phytodiversity of Ganpur Forest, Birbhum District, West Bengal, India with Reference to Their Medicinal Properties
    Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2016) 5(6): 973-989 International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences ISSN: 2319-7706 Volume 5 Number 6 (2016) pp. 973-989 Journal homepage: http://www.ijcmas.com Original Research Article http://dx.doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2016.506.104 Phytodiversity of Ganpur forest, Birbhum District, West Bengal, India with reference to their Medicinal properties Nisith Ranjan Sarkar, Subrata Mondal and Sudhendu Mandal* UGC-DRS Department of Botany, Visva-Bharati, Santiniketan- 731235, India *Corresponding author ABSTRACT K eywo rd s The present study deals with the observation on phytodiversity including its Phytodiversity, uses, distribution and occurrence to achieve the current strategic plan for conservation, biodiversity conservation. The plants are enumerated according to the biodiversity, Birbhum district, alphabetical order of the plant names along with local names and their uses. Gonpur forest During this investigation 229 plant species were collected from the forest under 81 families and 184 genera, among them 193 species belong to Article Info dicots with 70 families and 154 genera, and the 11 families 30 genera and Accepted: 36 species of monocots. Local healers and healers from neighboring state 28 May 2016 Available Online: like Jharkhand identified Gonpur forest as one of the major threats to 10 June 2016 vegetation and flora of the forest. Introduction The Birbhum district is one of the lateritic It is one of the most species rich forests in belt district of West Bengal. It is situated this district that is still unexplored. Few between 233230 to 243500 North scattered works on the flora of Birbhum latitude and 87525 to 882 East district have been published by Basak, 1968 longitude, total area of the district is about & 75; Guha, 1968; Basak and Guha Bakshi, 4550.94 sq.km (5.10% of the state area).
    [Show full text]
  • 27April12acquatic Plants
    International Plant Protection Convention Protecting the world’s plant resources from pests 01 2012 ENG Aquatic plants their uses and risks Implementation Review and Support System Support and Review Implementation A review of the global status of aquatic plants Aquatic plants their uses and risks A review of the global status of aquatic plants Ryan M. Wersal, Ph.D. & John D. Madsen, Ph.D. i The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of speciic companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned.All rights reserved. FAO encourages reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Non-commercial uses will be authorized free of charge, upon request. Reproduction for resale or other commercial purposes, including educational purposes, may incur fees. Applications for permission to reproduce or disseminate FAO copyright materials, and all queries concerning rights and licences, should be addressed by e-mail to [email protected] or to the Chief, Publishing Policy and Support Branch, Ofice of Knowledge Exchange,
    [Show full text]
  • Vulgaris in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau and Adjacent Areas
    Chloroplast DNA Phylogeography Reveals Repeated Range Expansion in a Widespread Aquatic Herb Hippuris vulgaris in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau and Adjacent Areas Jin-Ming Chen1., Zhi-Yuan Du1., Shan-Shan Sun1,2, Robert Wahiti Gituru3, Qing-Feng Wang1* 1 Key Laboratory of Aquatic Botany and Watershed Ecology, Wuhan Botanical Garden, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei, China, 2 Graduate University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China, 3 Botany Department, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Nairobi, Kenya Abstract Background: The Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau (QTP) is one of the most extensive habitats for alpine plants in the world. Climatic oscillations during the Quaternary ice age had a dramatic effect on species ranges on the QTP and the adjacent areas. However, how the distribution ranges of aquatic plant species shifted on the QTP in response to Quaternary climatic changes remains almost unknown. Methodology and Principal Findings: We studied the phylogeography and demographic history of the widespread aquatic herb Hippuris vulgaris from the QTP and adjacent areas. Our sampling included 385 individuals from 47 natural populations of H. vulgaris. Using sequences from four chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) non-coding regions, we distinguished eight different cpDNA haplotypes. From the cpDNA variation in H. vulgaris, we found a very high level of population differentiation (GST = 0.819) but the phylogeographical structure remained obscure (NST = 0.853.GST = 0.819, P.0.05). Phylogenetic analyses revealed two main cpDNA haplotype lineages. The split between these two haplotype groups can be dated back to the mid-to-late Pleistocene (ca. 0.480 Myr). Mismatch distribution analyses showed that each of these had experienced a recent range expansion.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Common Native & Invasive Freshwater Plants in Alaska
    Introduction to Common Native & Potential Invasive Freshwater Plants in Alaska Cover photographs by (top to bottom, left to right): Tara Chestnut/Hannah E. Anderson, Jamie Fenneman, Vanessa Morgan, Dana Visalli, Jamie Fenneman, Lynda K. Moore and Denny Lassuy. Introduction to Common Native & Potential Invasive Freshwater Plants in Alaska This document is based on An Aquatic Plant Identification Manual for Washington’s Freshwater Plants, which was modified with permission from the Washington State Department of Ecology, by the Center for Lakes and Reservoirs at Portland State University for Alaska Department of Fish and Game US Fish & Wildlife Service - Coastal Program US Fish & Wildlife Service - Aquatic Invasive Species Program December 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments ............................................................................ x Introduction Overview ............................................................................. xvi How to Use This Manual .................................................... xvi Categories of Special Interest Imperiled, Rare and Uncommon Aquatic Species ..................... xx Indigenous Peoples Use of Aquatic Plants .............................. xxi Invasive Aquatic Plants Impacts ................................................................................. xxi Vectors ................................................................................. xxii Prevention Tips .................................................... xxii Early Detection and Reporting
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic Vascular Plant Species Distribution Maps
    Appendix 11.5.1: Aquatic Vascular Plant Species Distribution Maps These distribution maps are for 116 aquatic vascular macrophyte species (Table 1). Aquatic designation follows habitat descriptions in Haines and Vining (1998), and includes submergent, floating and some emergent species. See Appendix 11.4 for list of species. Also included in Appendix 11.4 is the number of HUC-10 watersheds from which each taxon has been recorded, and the county-level distributions. Data are from nine sources, as compiled in the MABP database (plus a few additional records derived from ancilliary information contained in reports from two fisheries surveys in the Upper St. John basin organized by The Nature Conservancy). With the exception of the University of Maine herbarium records, most locations represent point samples (coordinates were provided in data sources or derived by MABP from site descriptions in data sources). The herbarium data are identified only to township. In the species distribution maps, town-level records are indicated by center-points (centroids). Figure 1 on this page shows as polygons the towns where taxon records are identified only at the town level. Data Sources: MABP ID MABP DataSet Name Provider 7 Rare taxa from MNAP lake plant surveys D. Cameron, MNAP 8 Lake plant surveys D. Cameron, MNAP 35 Acadia National Park plant survey C. Greene et al. 63 Lake plant surveys A. Dieffenbacher-Krall 71 Natural Heritage Database (rare plants) MNAP 91 University of Maine herbarium database C. Campbell 183 Natural Heritage Database (delisted species) MNAP 194 Rapid bioassessment surveys D. Cameron, MNAP 207 Invasive aquatic plant records MDEP Maps are in alphabetical order by species name.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Full Report Pdf, 2.9 MB
    VKM Report 2016:50 Assessment of the risks to Norwegian biodiversity from the import and keeping of aquarium and garden pond plants Opinion of the Panel on Alien Organisms and Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) of the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety Report from the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety (VKM) 2016:50 Assessment of the risks to Norwegian biodiversity from the import and keeping of aquarium and garden pond plants Opinion of the Panel on Alien Organisms and Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) of the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety 01.11.2016 ISBN: 00000-00000 Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety (VKM) Po 4404 Nydalen N – 0403 Oslo Norway Phone: +47 21 62 28 00 Email: [email protected] www.vkm.no www.english.vkm.no Suggested citation: VKM (2016). Assessment of the risks to Norwegian biodiversity from the import and keeping of aquarium and garden pond plants. Scientific Opinion on the on Alien Organisms and Trade in Endangered species of the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety ISBN: 978-82-8259-240-6, Oslo, Norway. VKM Report 2016:50 Title: Assessment of the risks to Norwegian biodiversity from the import and keeping of aquarium and garden pond plants Authors preparing the draft opinion Hugo de Boer (chair), Maria G. Asmyhr (VKM staff), Hanne H. Grundt, Inga Kjersti Sjøtun, Hans K. Stenøien, Iris Stiers. Assessed and approved The opinion has been assessed and approved by Panel on Alien organisms and Trade in Endangered Species (CITES). Members of the panel are: Vigdis Vandvik (chair), Hugo de Boer, Jan Ove Gjershaug, Kjetil Hindar, Lawrence Kirkendall, Nina Elisabeth Nagy, Anders Nielsen, Eli K.
    [Show full text]
  • Low Risk Aquarium and Pond Plants
    Plant Identification Guide Low-risk aquarium and pond plants Planting these in your pond or aquarium is environmentally-friendly. Glossostigma elatinoides, image © Sonia Frimmel. One of the biggest threats to New Zealand’s waterbodies is the establishment and proliferation of weeds. The majority of New Zealand’s current aquatic weeds started out as aquarium and pond plants. To reduce the occurrence of new weeds becoming established in waterbodies this guide has been prepared to encourage the use of aquarium and pond plants that pose minimal risk to waterbodies. Guide prepared by Dr John Clayton, Paula Reeves, Paul Champion and Tracey Edwards, National Centre of Aquatic Biodiversity and Biosecurity, NIWA with funding from the Department of Conservation. The guides will be updated on a regular basis and will be available on the NIWA website: www.niwa.co.nz/ncabb/tools. Key to plant life-forms Sprawling marginal plants. Grow across the ground and out over water. Pond plants Short turf-like plants. Grow in shallow water on the edges of ponds and foreground of aquariums. Includes very small plants (up to 2-3 cm in height). Most species can grow both submerged (usually more erect) and emergent. Pond and aquarium plants Tall emergent plants. Can grow in water depths up to 2 m deep depending on the species. Usually tall reed-like plants but sometimes with broad leaves. Ideal for deeper ponds. Pond plants Free floating plants. These plants grow on the water surface and are not anchored to banks or bottom substrates. Pond and aquarium plants Floating-leaved plants. Water lily-type plants.
    [Show full text]
  • LACON: Lake Assessment for Conservation Version 1 Manual
    Scottish Natural Heritage Archive Report No. 175 LACON: Lake Assessment for Conservation Version 1 Manual ARCHIVE REPORT Archive Report No. 175 LACON: Lake Assessment for Conservation Version 1 Manual For further information on this report please contact: Alison Lee Scottish Natural Heritage Silvan House 231 Corstorphine Road EDINBURGH EH12 7AT Telephone: 0131 316 2620 E-mail: [email protected] This report should be quoted as: Palmer, M.A. 2008. LACON: Lake Assessment for Conservation – Version 1 Manual. Scottish Natural Heritage Archive Report No. 175. This report, or any part of it, should not be reproduced without the permission of Scottish Natural Heritage. This permission will not be withheld unreasonably. The views expressed by the author(s) of this report should not be taken as the views and policies of Scottish Natural Heritage. © Scottish Natural Heritage 2019. Archive Reports Scottish Natural Heritage is committed to making the findings of all of its research publicly available whenever possible. In the past, a number of reports from staff and contractors were produced as paper documents and lodged in the SNH library or file systems. Some related to Site Condition Monitoring, others covered a range of subjects. These were not published as Research Reports for a number of reasons. In order to make these reports more available, we have decided to publish them online under the series title of Archive Reports. These will be numbered consecutively in the order that they are prepared for web publication. Their publication date, authors and title will be recorded as presented in the original report. The Archive Reports will be published as scanned PDF files of the original reports.
    [Show full text]
  • Fruits and Seeds of Genera in the Subfamily Faboideae (Fabaceae)
    Fruits and Seeds of United States Department of Genera in the Subfamily Agriculture Agricultural Faboideae (Fabaceae) Research Service Technical Bulletin Number 1890 Volume I December 2003 United States Department of Agriculture Fruits and Seeds of Agricultural Research Genera in the Subfamily Service Technical Bulletin Faboideae (Fabaceae) Number 1890 Volume I Joseph H. Kirkbride, Jr., Charles R. Gunn, and Anna L. Weitzman Fruits of A, Centrolobium paraense E.L.R. Tulasne. B, Laburnum anagyroides F.K. Medikus. C, Adesmia boronoides J.D. Hooker. D, Hippocrepis comosa, C. Linnaeus. E, Campylotropis macrocarpa (A.A. von Bunge) A. Rehder. F, Mucuna urens (C. Linnaeus) F.K. Medikus. G, Phaseolus polystachios (C. Linnaeus) N.L. Britton, E.E. Stern, & F. Poggenburg. H, Medicago orbicularis (C. Linnaeus) B. Bartalini. I, Riedeliella graciliflora H.A.T. Harms. J, Medicago arabica (C. Linnaeus) W. Hudson. Kirkbride is a research botanist, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, BARC West Room 304, Building 011A, Beltsville, MD, 20705-2350 (email = [email protected]). Gunn is a botanist (retired) from Brevard, NC (email = [email protected]). Weitzman is a botanist with the Smithsonian Institution, Department of Botany, Washington, DC. Abstract Kirkbride, Joseph H., Jr., Charles R. Gunn, and Anna L radicle junction, Crotalarieae, cuticle, Cytiseae, Weitzman. 2003. Fruits and seeds of genera in the subfamily Dalbergieae, Daleeae, dehiscence, DELTA, Desmodieae, Faboideae (Fabaceae). U. S. Department of Agriculture, Dipteryxeae, distribution, embryo, embryonic axis, en- Technical Bulletin No. 1890, 1,212 pp. docarp, endosperm, epicarp, epicotyl, Euchresteae, Fabeae, fracture line, follicle, funiculus, Galegeae, Genisteae, Technical identification of fruits and seeds of the economi- gynophore, halo, Hedysareae, hilar groove, hilar groove cally important legume plant family (Fabaceae or lips, hilum, Hypocalypteae, hypocotyl, indehiscent, Leguminosae) is often required of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Ranunculaceae.Pdf
    Botanische Bestimmungsübungen 1 Ranunculaceae Ranunculaceae Hahnenfußgewächse 1 Systematik und Verbreitung Die Ranunculaceae gehören zu den Eudikotyledonen. Innerhalb dieser werden sie zur Ordnung der Ranunculales (Hahnenfußartige) gestellt. Die Ranunculaceae umfassen rund 60 Gattungen mit insgesamt etwa 2500 Arten und werden derzeit in 5 Unterfamilien eingeteilt: 1. Glaucidioideae (z. B. Glaucidium, Scheinhahnenfuß), 2. Hydrastidoideae (z. B. Hydrastis, Gelbwurz), 3. Coptoideae (z. B. Coptis, Gold- faden), 4. Thalictroideae (z. B. Thalictrum, Wiesenraute) und 5. Ranunculoideae (z. B. Ranunculus, Hahnenfuß). Letztere wird in 10 Triben untergliedert Hahnenfußgewächse sind kosmopolitisch verbreitet mit einem Schwerpunkt in den gemäßigten bis kühleren Zonen der Nordhemisphäre. Das Diversitätszentrum liegt in O-Asien. Der Großteil der bei uns heimischen Arten stammt aus der Gattung Ranunculus (Hahnenfuß). Abb. 1: Verbreitungskarte. 2 Morphologie 2.1 Habitus Der Großteil der Arten sind krautige Pflanzen. Wenige Arten, z. B. innerhalb der Gattung Clematis (Waldrebe), sind verholzte Kletterpflanzen. Bei einigen Arten, z. B. Eranthis hyemalis (Winterling), handelt es sich um Geophyten mit einer Knolle © PD DR. VEIT M. DÖRKEN, Universität Konstanz, FB Biologie Botanische Bestimmungsübungen 2 Ranunculaceae als unterirdisches Überdauerungsorgan. Einige Arten, z. B. Ranunculus repens (Kriechender Hahnenfuß), treiben oberirdische Ausläufer. Andere Arten wie Anemone nemorosa (Busch-Windröschen), hingegen haben ein kräftiges unterirdisches Rhizom (Kriechspross).
    [Show full text]