LACON: Lake Assessment for Conservation Version 1 Manual

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

LACON: Lake Assessment for Conservation Version 1 Manual Scottish Natural Heritage Archive Report No. 175 LACON: Lake Assessment for Conservation Version 1 Manual ARCHIVE REPORT Archive Report No. 175 LACON: Lake Assessment for Conservation Version 1 Manual For further information on this report please contact: Alison Lee Scottish Natural Heritage Silvan House 231 Corstorphine Road EDINBURGH EH12 7AT Telephone: 0131 316 2620 E-mail: [email protected] This report should be quoted as: Palmer, M.A. 2008. LACON: Lake Assessment for Conservation – Version 1 Manual. Scottish Natural Heritage Archive Report No. 175. This report, or any part of it, should not be reproduced without the permission of Scottish Natural Heritage. This permission will not be withheld unreasonably. The views expressed by the author(s) of this report should not be taken as the views and policies of Scottish Natural Heritage. © Scottish Natural Heritage 2019. Archive Reports Scottish Natural Heritage is committed to making the findings of all of its research publicly available whenever possible. In the past, a number of reports from staff and contractors were produced as paper documents and lodged in the SNH library or file systems. Some related to Site Condition Monitoring, others covered a range of subjects. These were not published as Research Reports for a number of reasons. In order to make these reports more available, we have decided to publish them online under the series title of Archive Reports. These will be numbered consecutively in the order that they are prepared for web publication. Their publication date, authors and title will be recorded as presented in the original report. The Archive Reports will be published as scanned PDF files of the original reports. They have not been subject to any new editing, formatting or other changes, other than the cover, title page and this page. Many of the reports published as Archive Reports were produced by contractors and were originally intended as internal documents to inform our policy and advice. As a result they may contain historical information that is no longer current or accurate, and may contain views of contractors or staff which do not represent the current views and policy of SNH. Many of the reports published as Archive Reports were produced by contractors and were originally intended as internal documents to inform our policy and advice. As a result they may contain historical information that is no longer current or accurate, and may contain views of contractors or staff which do not represent the current views and policy of SNH. LACON: LAKE ASSESSMENT FOR CONSERVATION CONTENTS Page SUMMARY iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS v INTRODUCTION 1 Background 1 Data requirements 2 The LACON evaluation system 2 Testing the LACON scoring system 5 Interpretation of the output 5 Possible future work 7 CONSERVATION CRITERIA 8 PHYSICAL DIVERSITY 8 Concept of Physical Diversity 8 Calculation of Physical Diversity Index 9 PDY 1. Littoral substrates 9 Table PDY 1. Littoral substrate types found in lakes 9 PDY 2. Structure of aquatic vegetation 10 Table PDY 2. Growth form categories of standing water vegetation 10 PDY 3. Other habitat features 11 Table PDY 3. Other habitat features of lakes 11 NATURALNESS 12 Concept of Naturalness 12 Calculation of Naturalness Index 13 NA 1. Physical features 14 NA 2. Aquatic macrophytes 15 Table NA 2.1. Alien aquatic vascular plants established in standing waters in Great Britain 16 Table NA 2.2. Aquatic vascular plants native to Great Britain but not to Scotland, established in standing waters in Scotland 17 Table NA 2.3. Standing water vascular plants native to Great Britain that are restricted in natural distribution, but are introduced elsewhere 17 NA 3. Adjacent habitat 18 Table NA 3. Natural and artificial Phase 1 Habitat Survey categories 19 REPRESENTATIVENESS 20 Concept of Representativeness 20 Calculation of Representativeness Index 22 RE 1. Aquatic macrophyte complement 23 i Table RE 1. Most typical submerged and floating macrophyte taxa in Lake Groups 24 RE 2. Plant Lake Ecotype Index ( PLEX) 26 Table RE 2.1. PLEX scores for submerged and floating macrophytes 27 Figure RE 2. Range of PLEX scores for Lake Groups 29 Table RE 2.2. Range of PLEX scores for Lake Groups 29 RARITY 30 Concept of Rarity 30 Calculation of Rarity Index 34 RA 1. Bern Convention / Habitats Directive plant species 35 Table RA 1. Standing water plant species native to the UK listed in Appendix I of the Bern Convention and Annexes IIb and IVb of the Habitats Directive 35 RA 2. Scheduled plant species 36 Table RA 2. Standing water vascular plant and charophyte species included in Schedule 8 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 and protected under the Nature Conservation (Scotland) Act 2004 36 RA 3. Red List plants 38 Table RA 3. Standing water vascular plants and charophytes included in British Red Lists 39 RA 4. Habitats Directive Annex IIb plant species common in the UK 41 RA 5. Near Threatened, Nationally Rare and UK Biodiversity Action Plan priority plant species 41 Table RA 5. Standing water vascular plant and charophyte species that are Near Threatened, Nationally Rare or UK Biodiversity Action Plan priority 42 RA 6. Nationally Scarce plant species 43 Table RA 6. Standing water vascular plant, charophyte and liverwort species that are Nationally Scarce 44 RA 7. Plant species for which Britain has International Responsibility 45 Table RA 7. Standing water plants for which Britain has International Responsibility 45 RA 8. Plant species Uncommon in England, Scotland or Wales 46 Table RA 8.1. Standing water plant species Uncommon in England 47 Table RA 8.2. Standing water plant species Uncommon in Scotland 48 Table RA 8.3. Standing water plant species Uncommon in Wales 49 RA 9. Regionally Uncommon plant species 50 Table RA 9.1 Regionally Uncommon standing water plant species: Environment Agency Regions 52 Table RA 9.2. Regionally Uncommon standing water plant species: Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA) Areas 53 ii SPECIES RICHNESS 54 Concept of Species Richness 54 Calculation of Species Richness Index 54 SR 1. Aquatic macrophytes 56 Table SR 1. Checklist of native aquatic macrophytes of standing water 57 SR 2. Marginal vegetation communities 63 Table SR 2. National Vegetation Classification swamp and tall-herb fen communities associated with standing water 64 IMPACTS 65 Quantifying impacts 65 Calculation of Impacts Index 66 IM 1. Acidification 68 IM 2. Eutrophication 68 IM 3. Water abstraction and water level management 69 IM 4. Recreational, educational and/or military pressures 69 IM 5. Introduced species 70 IM 6. Surrounding land use 70 IM 7. Modification of lake morphology 71 ADDITIONAL FEATURES OF IMPORTANCE (AFIs) 72 Concept of Additional Features of Importance 72 Table AFI 1. Additional Features of Importance 72 Table AFI 1.1 Some established alien vascular plants of wetlands and water margins 78 REFERENCES 79 ANNEX 1 The standard loch survey method 82 ANNEX 2 Results of tests on the LACON scoring system 83 ANNEX 3 Maps showing the distribution of Lake Groups A to J in Britain 93 ANNEX 4 Key to Lake Groups 104 ANNEX 5 Constancy table for Lake Groups: submerged and floating vegetation 106 ANNEX 6 Rarity status of standing water plants in Britain 107 ANNEX 7 Maps of Environment Agency Regions and Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA) Areas 118 iii SUMMARY LACON (Lake Assessment for Conservation) is a semi-quantitative method of assessing the nature conservation interest and value of standing waters in Great Britain. It is modelled on SERCON (System for Evaluating Rivers for Conservation), which was developed by the UK statutory nature conservation agencies, in conjunction with a number of other bodies, for the assessment of river conservation value. LACON is based on the most important and well-used of the 'classic' nature conservation evaluation criteria: naturalness, representativeness (typicalness), rarity and diversity. LACON elaborates this approach by using a range of attributes under each criterion and applying a scoring system to achieve rigour and repeatability in the assessment. Thus, the value of a site for a particular criterion is quantified in relation to that of other sites. LACON also attempts to quantify the impact of human activity on a water body. A comprehensive 'library' of reference data, on which the scoring is based, is incorporated in this manual. Since the mid 1970s, the British statutory nature conservation agencies have carried out botanical surveys of approximately 3500 standing waters throughout England, Scotland and Wales. These water bodies include lochs, lakes, meres, ponds, pools, lagoons, reservoirs and gravel pits. Most are fresh waters; a few are slightly saline. The data from these surveys are now incorporated in a computerised database held by the Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC). LACON is a tool for assessing the nature conservation value of these and other lakes, using data collected in a standard manner. This manual deals mainly with habitat features and aquatic and marginal plant communities. It is hoped that other taxonomic groups might be more fully incorporated into LACON in the future. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thanks are due to Chris Preston and Henry Arnold, of the Biological Records Centre, CEH Monks Wood, for drawing up preliminary checklists of plants in Water Authority regions and SEPA areas. Phil Boon and Mary Hennessy, of Scottish Natural Heritage, commented on drafts of this manual. Nigel Holmes and Phil Boon provided invaluable insights into the intricacies of SERCON. The Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC) gave permission for the use of distribution maps of Lake Groups (Annex 3) and other information from the lake classification work (Annexes 4 to 5). The Scottish Environment Protection Agency provided the map of SEPA areas (Annex 7). v INTRODUCTION Background LACON (Lake Assessment for Conservation) is a method of assessing the nature conservation value of standing waters.
Recommended publications
  • RI Equisetopsida and Lycopodiopsida.Indd
    IIntroductionntroduction byby FFrancisrancis UnderwoodUnderwood Rhode Island Equisetopsida, Lycopodiopsida and Isoetopsida Special Th anks to the following for giving permission for the use their images. Robbin Moran New York Botanical Garden George Yatskievych and Ann Larson Missouri Botanical Garden Jan De Laet, plantsystematics.org Th is pdf is a companion publication to Rhode Island Equisetopsida, Lycopodiopsida & Isoetopsida at among-ri-wildfl owers.org Th e Elfi n Press 2016 Introduction Formerly known as fern allies, Horsetails, Club-mosses, Fir-mosses, Spike-mosses and Quillworts are plants that have an alternate generation life-cycle similar to ferns, having both sporophyte and gametophyte stages. Equisetopsida Horsetails date from the Devonian period (416 to 359 million years ago) in earth’s history where they were trees up to 110 feet in height and helped to form the coal deposits of the Carboniferous period. Only one genus has survived to modern times (Equisetum). Horsetails Horsetails (Equisetum) have jointed stems with whorls of thin narrow leaves. In the sporophyte stage, they have a sterile and fertile form. Th ey produce only one type of spore. While the gametophytes produced from the spores appear to be plentiful, the successful reproduction of the sporophyte form is low with most Horsetails reproducing vegetatively. Lycopodiopsida Lycopodiopsida includes the clubmosses (Dendrolycopodium, Diphasiastrum, Lycopodiella, Lycopodium , Spinulum) and Fir-mosses (Huperzia) Clubmosses Clubmosses are evergreen plants that produce only microspores that develop into a gametophyte capable of producing both sperm and egg cells. Club-mosses can produce the spores either in leaf axils or at the top of their stems. Th e spore capsules form in a cone-like structures (strobili) at the top of the plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Common Native & Invasive Freshwater Plants in Alaska
    Introduction to Common Native & Potential Invasive Freshwater Plants in Alaska Cover photographs by (top to bottom, left to right): Tara Chestnut/Hannah E. Anderson, Jamie Fenneman, Vanessa Morgan, Dana Visalli, Jamie Fenneman, Lynda K. Moore and Denny Lassuy. Introduction to Common Native & Potential Invasive Freshwater Plants in Alaska This document is based on An Aquatic Plant Identification Manual for Washington’s Freshwater Plants, which was modified with permission from the Washington State Department of Ecology, by the Center for Lakes and Reservoirs at Portland State University for Alaska Department of Fish and Game US Fish & Wildlife Service - Coastal Program US Fish & Wildlife Service - Aquatic Invasive Species Program December 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments ............................................................................ x Introduction Overview ............................................................................. xvi How to Use This Manual .................................................... xvi Categories of Special Interest Imperiled, Rare and Uncommon Aquatic Species ..................... xx Indigenous Peoples Use of Aquatic Plants .............................. xxi Invasive Aquatic Plants Impacts ................................................................................. xxi Vectors ................................................................................. xxii Prevention Tips .................................................... xxii Early Detection and Reporting
    [Show full text]
  • (Potamogetonaceae), Según Las Categorías Uicn-2001
    Flora Montiberica 39: 37-46 (VI-2008). ISSN 1138-5952 RECATALOGACIÓN DE POTAMOGETON PRAELONGUS WULFEN (POTAMOGETONACEAE), SEGÚN LAS CATEGORÍAS UICN-2001 José Luis BENITO ALONSO*, Esperança GACIA**, Enric BALLESTEROS**, Eglantine CHAPPUIS** & Empar CARRILLO*** *Jolube Consultoría Ambiental. Jaca (Huesca) [email protected] - www.jolube.net **Centre d'Estudis Avançats de Blanes, CSIC - www.ceab.csic.es ***Departamento de Biología Vegetal. Facultad de Biología. Universidad de Barcelona - www.bio.ub.es RESUMEN: Proponemos la recatalogación de la espiga de agua Potamogeton praelongus Wulfen, a la categoría de «En Peligro Crítico (CR)» según criterios UICN-2001, así como su inclusión en los catálogos oficiales de especies amenazadas de España, Aragón y Cataluña en la categorías de «En peligro de extinción». Pa- labras clave: Vegetación hidrofítica, macrófitos acuáticos, Potamion, fitosociología, flora amenazada, categorías UICN 2001, análisis de agua, Pirineos, Aragón, Catalu- ña, España. SUMMARY: We propose to recatalogue Potamogeton praelongus Wulfen, into the category of «Critically Endangered (CR)» according to IUCN-2001 criteria, and its inclusion in the official catalogue of threatened species of Spain, Aragon and Ca- talonia in the categories of «Danger Extinction». Keywords: Hydrophytic vegetation, aquatic macrophytes, Potamion, phytosociology, threatened flora, IUCN 2001 categories, water analysis, Pyrenees, Aragon, Catalonia, Spain. INTRODUCCIÓN y funcionamiento de comunidades de ma- crófitos de lagos de alta montaña» (GA- La espiga
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Quillwort Isoetes Lacustris
    Natural Heritage Lake Quillwort & Endangered Species Isoetes lacustris L. Program www.mass.gov/nhesp State Status: Endangered Federal Status: None Massachusetts Division of Fisheries & Wildlife DESCRIPTION: Lake Quillwort is a perennial, aquatic, nonflowering member of the Quillwort family (Isoetaceae). This inconspicuous species lives submerged in ponds as a rosette of linear leaves (somewhat resembling chives), and reproduces via spores. AIDS TO IDENTIFICATION: The rosette of Lake Quillwort is composed of sharply pointed leaves, 0.7 to 2 mm wide and mostly 5 to 10 cm (2–4 in.) long, occasionally reaching 20 cm. The leaves are dark green, firm, fleshy, and brittle, emerging from a very short, thick stem that is anchored in the substrate by a subterranean corm. The leaf bases of quillworts are swollen, flattened, and concave; the rosette is arranged tightly like the bracts of an artichoke. Within the swollen Lake Quillwort is an aquatic species with a rosette of leaves that leaf bases are sporangia, sacs that house the male have swollen bases; within the leaf bases are sporangia with gametophyte-bearing microspores and the female microspores and megaspores. Photo by Robbin Moran. megaspores. A sheath, or velum, covers the sporangia; in Lake Quillwort, the velum covers up to half of the sporangia. The megaspore of Lake Quillwort, which SIMILAR SPECIES: Quillwort species are very requires a microscope to view, is mostly covered with similar in appearance and identification requires sharp, wavy crests, with a band (the girdle) encircling examination of the ornamentation of mature megaspores the spore that lacks ridges and is covered with tiny under a microscope.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic Vascular Plants of New England, Station Bulletin, No.528
    University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository NHAES Bulletin New Hampshire Agricultural Experiment Station 4-1-1985 Aquatic vascular plants of New England, Station Bulletin, no.528 Crow, G. E. Hellquist, C. B. New Hampshire Agricultural Experiment Station Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/agbulletin Recommended Citation Crow, G. E.; Hellquist, C. B.; and New Hampshire Agricultural Experiment Station, "Aquatic vascular plants of New England, Station Bulletin, no.528" (1985). NHAES Bulletin. 489. https://scholars.unh.edu/agbulletin/489 This Text is brought to you for free and open access by the New Hampshire Agricultural Experiment Station at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in NHAES Bulletin by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BIO SCI tON BULLETIN 528 LIBRARY April, 1985 ezi quatic Vascular Plants of New England: Part 8. Lentibulariaceae by G. E. Crow and C. B. Hellquist NEW HAMPSHIRE AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE DURHAM, NEW HAMPSHIRE 03824 UmVERSITY OF NEV/ MAMP.SHJM LIBRARY ISSN: 0077-8338 BIO SCI > [ON BULLETIN 528 LIBRARY April, 1985 e.zi quatic Vascular Plants of New England: Part 8. Lentibulariaceae by G. E. Crow and C. B. Hellquist NEW HAMPSHIRE AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE DURHAM, NEW HAMPSHIRE 03824 UNtVERSITY or NEVv' MAMP.SHI.Ht LIBRARY ISSN: 0077-8338 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We wish to thank Drs. Robert K. Godfrey and George B. Rossbach for their helpful comments on the manuscript. We are also grateful to the curators of the following herbaria for use of their collections: BRU, CONN, CUW, GH, NHN, KIRI, MASS, MAINE, NASC, NCBS, NHA, NEBC, VT, YU.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic Vascular Plant Species Distribution Maps
    Appendix 11.5.1: Aquatic Vascular Plant Species Distribution Maps These distribution maps are for 116 aquatic vascular macrophyte species (Table 1). Aquatic designation follows habitat descriptions in Haines and Vining (1998), and includes submergent, floating and some emergent species. See Appendix 11.4 for list of species. Also included in Appendix 11.4 is the number of HUC-10 watersheds from which each taxon has been recorded, and the county-level distributions. Data are from nine sources, as compiled in the MABP database (plus a few additional records derived from ancilliary information contained in reports from two fisheries surveys in the Upper St. John basin organized by The Nature Conservancy). With the exception of the University of Maine herbarium records, most locations represent point samples (coordinates were provided in data sources or derived by MABP from site descriptions in data sources). The herbarium data are identified only to township. In the species distribution maps, town-level records are indicated by center-points (centroids). Figure 1 on this page shows as polygons the towns where taxon records are identified only at the town level. Data Sources: MABP ID MABP DataSet Name Provider 7 Rare taxa from MNAP lake plant surveys D. Cameron, MNAP 8 Lake plant surveys D. Cameron, MNAP 35 Acadia National Park plant survey C. Greene et al. 63 Lake plant surveys A. Dieffenbacher-Krall 71 Natural Heritage Database (rare plants) MNAP 91 University of Maine herbarium database C. Campbell 183 Natural Heritage Database (delisted species) MNAP 194 Rapid bioassessment surveys D. Cameron, MNAP 207 Invasive aquatic plant records MDEP Maps are in alphabetical order by species name.
    [Show full text]
  • Linnaeus at Home
    NATURE-BASED ACTIVITIES FOR PARENTS LINNAEUS 1 AT HOME A GuiDE TO EXPLORING NATURE WITH CHILDREN Acknowledgements Written by Joe Burton Inspired by Carl Linnaeus With thanks to editors and reviewers: LINNAEUS Lyn Baber, Melissa Balzano, Jane Banham, Sarah Black, Isabelle Charmantier, Mark Chase, Maarten Christenhusz, Alex Davey, Gareth Dauley, AT HOME Zia Forrai, Jon Hale, Simon Hiscock, Alice ter Meulen, Lynn Parker, Elizabeth Rollinson, James Rosindell, Daryl Stenvoll-Wells, Ross Ziegelmeier Share your explorations @LinneanLearning #LinnaeusAtHome Facing page: Carl Linnaeus paper doll, illustrated in 1953. © Linnean Society of London 2019 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrival system or trasmitted in any form or by any means without the prior consent of the copyright owner. www.linnean.org/learning “If you do not know Introduction the names of things, the knowledge of them is Who was Carl Linnaeus? Contents Pitfall traps 5 lost too” Carl Linnaeus was one of the most influential scientists in the world, - Carl Linnaeus A bust of ‘The Young Linnaeus’ by but you might not know a lot about him. Thanks to Linnaeus, we Bug hunting 9 Anthony Smith (2007). have a naming system for all species so that we can understand how different species are related and can start to learn about the origins Plant hunting 13 of life on Earth. Pond dipping 17 As a young man, Linnaeus would study the animals, plants, Bird feeders 21 minerals and habitats around him. By watching the natural world, he began to understand that all living things are adapted to their Squirrel feeders 25 environments and that they can be grouped together by their characteristics (like animals with backbones, or plants that produce Friendly spaces 29 spores).
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Full Report Pdf, 2.9 MB
    VKM Report 2016:50 Assessment of the risks to Norwegian biodiversity from the import and keeping of aquarium and garden pond plants Opinion of the Panel on Alien Organisms and Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) of the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety Report from the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety (VKM) 2016:50 Assessment of the risks to Norwegian biodiversity from the import and keeping of aquarium and garden pond plants Opinion of the Panel on Alien Organisms and Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) of the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety 01.11.2016 ISBN: 00000-00000 Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety (VKM) Po 4404 Nydalen N – 0403 Oslo Norway Phone: +47 21 62 28 00 Email: [email protected] www.vkm.no www.english.vkm.no Suggested citation: VKM (2016). Assessment of the risks to Norwegian biodiversity from the import and keeping of aquarium and garden pond plants. Scientific Opinion on the on Alien Organisms and Trade in Endangered species of the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety ISBN: 978-82-8259-240-6, Oslo, Norway. VKM Report 2016:50 Title: Assessment of the risks to Norwegian biodiversity from the import and keeping of aquarium and garden pond plants Authors preparing the draft opinion Hugo de Boer (chair), Maria G. Asmyhr (VKM staff), Hanne H. Grundt, Inga Kjersti Sjøtun, Hans K. Stenøien, Iris Stiers. Assessed and approved The opinion has been assessed and approved by Panel on Alien organisms and Trade in Endangered Species (CITES). Members of the panel are: Vigdis Vandvik (chair), Hugo de Boer, Jan Ove Gjershaug, Kjetil Hindar, Lawrence Kirkendall, Nina Elisabeth Nagy, Anders Nielsen, Eli K.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography of Isoetes
    BIBLIOGRAPHY OF ISOETES ALLEN, B.M. 1975. A note on the distribution of Isoetes in the Cadiz Province, Spain. Fern Gaz. (U.K.) 11 (2-3): 163-164 (1975). ALONSO, PAZ, E. 1989. Notas sobre plantas nuevas o interesantes para la flora Uruguaya: 1. (Notes on new or interesting plants for the Uruguayan flora: 1.) Comun. Bot. Mus. Hist. Nat. Montevideo 5 (91): 1-4 (1989) - Isoetes pp.2-3 ALSTON, A.H.G. 1982. Isoetaceae: 1. In Steenis, C.G.G.J. van, Holttum, R. E., eds. Flora Malesiana, series 2. Pteridophytes, volume 1. The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff, Dr. W. Junk Publ. 62-64 (1982)- illus., chrom. nos., key. ANDREIS, C., RODONDI, G. 1987. Alcune stazioni di Isoetes echinospora Dur. nel Bresciano e osservazioni al SEM delle spore delle Isoetes della flora Italica. Natura Bresciana no.23: 119-130 (1986 publ. 1987) - illus., maps. 4, ANTHONY, N.C., & E.A. SCHELPE, 1985. Two new taxa and a new combination in southern African Pteridophyta. Bothalia, 15 (3 & 4): 554-555 (1985) ARREGUIN-SANCHEZ, M., 1986. Nuevos registros y taxa interesantes de pteridofitas del Valle de Mexico. (Isoetaceae, Psilotaceae y Selaginellaceae) Phytologia 59 (7): 451-453 (1986) ASH, S., & K.B. PIGG. 1991. A new Jurassic Isoetites (Isoetales) from the Wallowa Terrane in Hells Canyon Oregon and Idaho. Amer. J. Bot. 78: 1636-1642. BAJPAI, U., & H.K. MAHESHWARI,1985. EM studies on the megaspores of Isoetes coromandelina. Phytomorphology, 34 (1-4): 226-231 (1984 publ. 1985) - illus. BALDWIN, W.K.W. 1933. The organization of the young sporophyte of Isoetes engelmanni, A.
    [Show full text]
  • A Targeted Survey of Najas Flexilis
    A targeted survey of Najas flexilis ned in Department Green Unpublished Report, National Parks & Wildlife Service A targeted survey of Najas flexilis Cilian Roden and Paul Murphy Roden Ecology and Eireco Citation: Roden, C. & Murphy, P. (2014) Targeted survey of Najas flexilis. Unpublished Report, National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of the Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, Ireland. Keywords: Najas flexilis, Habitats Directive Site list: 2034, 1342,,297,1932,1919,2031,365,2130. Cover photos: © NPWS NPWS Project Officer for this report was: Deirdre Lynn; [email protected] © National Parks and Wildlife Service 2013 Targeted Najas survey ____________________________ Contents Contents .......................................................................................................................... 1 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................... 1 Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................ 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 2 Background .................................................................................................................. 2 Survey methods .............................................................................................................. 4 Results ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • WETLAND PLANTS – Full Species List (English) RECORDING FORM
    WETLAND PLANTS – full species list (English) RECORDING FORM Surveyor Name(s) Pond name Date e.g. John Smith (if known) Square: 4 fig grid reference Pond: 8 fig grid ref e.g. SP1243 (see your map) e.g. SP 1235 4325 (see your map) METHOD: wetland plants (full species list) survey Survey a single Focal Pond in each 1km square Aim: To assess pond quality and conservation value using plants, by recording all wetland plant species present within the pond’s outer boundary. How: Identify the outer boundary of the pond. This is the ‘line’ marking the pond’s highest yearly water levels (usually in early spring). It will probably not be the current water level of the pond, but should be evident from the extent of wetland vegetation (for example a ring of rushes growing at the pond’s outer edge), or other clues such as water-line marks on tree trunks or stones. Within the outer boundary, search all the dry and shallow areas of the pond that are accessible. Survey deeper areas with a net or grapnel hook. Record wetland plants found by crossing through the names on this sheet. You don’t need to record terrestrial species. For each species record its approximate abundance as a percentage of the pond’s surface area. Where few plants are present, record as ‘<1%’. If you are not completely confident in your species identification put’?’ by the species name. If you are really unsure put ‘??’. After your survey please enter the results online: www.freshwaterhabitats.org.uk/projects/waternet/ Aquatic plants (submerged-leaved species) Stonewort, Bristly (Chara hispida) Bistort, Amphibious (Persicaria amphibia) Arrowhead (Sagittaria sagittifolia) Stonewort, Clustered (Tolypella glomerata) Crystalwort, Channelled (Riccia canaliculata) Arrowhead, Canadian (Sagittaria rigida) Stonewort, Common (Chara vulgaris) Crystalwort, Lizard (Riccia bifurca) Arrowhead, Narrow-leaved (Sagittaria subulata) Stonewort, Convergent (Chara connivens) Duckweed , non-native sp.
    [Show full text]
  • NJ Native Plants - USDA
    NJ Native Plants - USDA Scientific Name Common Name N/I Family Category National Wetland Indicator Status Thermopsis villosa Aaron's rod N Fabaceae Dicot Rubus depavitus Aberdeen dewberry N Rosaceae Dicot Artemisia absinthium absinthium I Asteraceae Dicot Aplectrum hyemale Adam and Eve N Orchidaceae Monocot FAC-, FACW Yucca filamentosa Adam's needle N Agavaceae Monocot Gentianella quinquefolia agueweed N Gentianaceae Dicot FAC, FACW- Rhamnus alnifolia alderleaf buckthorn N Rhamnaceae Dicot FACU, OBL Medicago sativa alfalfa I Fabaceae Dicot Ranunculus cymbalaria alkali buttercup N Ranunculaceae Dicot OBL Rubus allegheniensis Allegheny blackberry N Rosaceae Dicot UPL, FACW Hieracium paniculatum Allegheny hawkweed N Asteraceae Dicot Mimulus ringens Allegheny monkeyflower N Scrophulariaceae Dicot OBL Ranunculus allegheniensis Allegheny Mountain buttercup N Ranunculaceae Dicot FACU, FAC Prunus alleghaniensis Allegheny plum N Rosaceae Dicot UPL, NI Amelanchier laevis Allegheny serviceberry N Rosaceae Dicot Hylotelephium telephioides Allegheny stonecrop N Crassulaceae Dicot Adlumia fungosa allegheny vine N Fumariaceae Dicot Centaurea transalpina alpine knapweed N Asteraceae Dicot Potamogeton alpinus alpine pondweed N Potamogetonaceae Monocot OBL Viola labradorica alpine violet N Violaceae Dicot FAC Trifolium hybridum alsike clover I Fabaceae Dicot FACU-, FAC Cornus alternifolia alternateleaf dogwood N Cornaceae Dicot Strophostyles helvola amberique-bean N Fabaceae Dicot Puccinellia americana American alkaligrass N Poaceae Monocot Heuchera americana
    [Show full text]