DOCSLIB.ORG

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Application for Renewal of Broadcast Station ) FCC File No. BRH-20110601ACB License of ) ) (Facility ID No. 16819) Red Zebra Broadcasting Licensee, LLC ) Station WWXX(FM) ) Buckland, VA ) To: Secretary, Federal Communications Commission Attn: Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau RED ZEBRA BROADCASTING LICENSEE, LLC’S CONSOLIDATED RESPONSE TO INFORMAL OBJECTIONS Andrew G. McBride Kathleen A. Kirby Gregory L. Masters Ari S. Meltzer Wiley Rein LLP 1776 K Street, NW Washington, DC 20006 TEL: 202.719.7000 FAX: 202.719.7049 Counsel for Red Zebra Broadcasting Licensee, LLC October 17, 2014 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Objections filed against the license renewal application of radio station WWXX(FM) (the “Station”), held by Red Zebra Broadcasting Licensee, LLC (“Red Zebra”), are meritless. In fact, the Objections amount to nothing more than a frivolous attempt to goad the Commission into banning the team name of Washington, D.C.’s NFL franchise from the nation’s airwaves. While there is, in fact, a public debate over the use of the name “Redskins” in association with the team, the Commission cannot appropriately serve as the arbiter of that dispute. No government agency could ban the use of the word “Redskins” any more than it could ban the objectors’ viewpoint that the word is offensive and should not be used. To designate the matter for hearing or strip the Station of its license would be arbitrary and capricious, inconsistent with Sections 309(k) and 326 of the Communications Act and long standing Commission precedent, and violative of the First and Fifth Amendments. The Commission’s task is not to pass judgment on the propriety of the name of Washington’s professional football team. Rather, it is to apply Section 309(k) of the Communications Act, the statutory standard for the Commission’s evaluation of a license renewal application. Section 309(k) requires the Commission to grant a license renewal application if: (i) the station has served the public interest, convenience, and necessity; (ii) there have been no serious violations of the Communications Act or Commission rules; and (iii) there have been no other violations by the licensee of the Act or Commission rules which, taken together, constitute a pattern of abuse. The objectors fail to make a prima facie case that the Station’s renewal application falls short of satisfying any prong of Section 309(k). In fact, it is clear from the Objections themselves and the press statements that accompanied their release that they were not filed in -ii- good faith and are a crass misuse of the license renewal process as part of a broader strategy to extort broadcasters to stop using the term “Redskins.” The Commission has never interpreted Section 309(k)’s “public interest, convenience, and necessity” standard as conferring the power to censor broadcast content. In scores of prior cases recognizing the First Amendment and Section 326’s express prohibition of radio censorship, the Commission has refused to take adverse action on a license renewal application based upon subjective determinations of appropriate content. While the objectors suggest that the Station’s use of the Redskins’ team name equates to “obscenity,” “indecency,” or “profanity,” the name plainly fits within none of these narrowly circumscribed definitions. And even if the Commission regulated so-called “hate speech” (which it does not), the broadcast of the Redskins’ team name cannot be fit into that category under any plausible description of that term. The objectors’ character attacks on Mr. Daniel Snyder, majority owner of the Washington Redskins and managing member of Red Zebra’s parent company, are shameful and baseless. For the most part, they are attempts to end-run the objectors’ sheer lack of a case against the Station’s renewal under the Communications Act or any FCC regulation or precedent. The assertions that the objectors cite as “additional factors” with respect to Mr. Snyder’s character are false and frivolous and, in any case, are far outside the Commission’s well-defined character policy. Additionally, the objectors’ character attacks ignore Mr. Snyder’s immeasurable contributions to the Washington, D.C. community and his outreach to Native Americans. Beyond applying the Communications Act and its own precedent, the Commission must also be mindful of the serious constitutional problems that are inherent in the Objections. The objectors propose a limitless expansion of the government’s censorial powers. Such viewpoint- based regulation is subject to strict scrutiny under the First Amendment and is almost universally -iii- condemned by the Supreme Court. The objectors’ requested relief also violates the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment, which eschews vague, arbitrary regulations and requires sufficient notice of what is proscribed. There is no hearing to be held, no further pleading that should be considered, and no other reason to delay the grant of the Station’s license renewal application. John F. Banzhaf III, the individual responsible for orchestrating the Objections, has publicly threatened to attack the renewals of, and even extract settlements from, stations throughout the country whose broadcasts accurately use the Washington Redskins’ full name. The Commission should expeditiously grant the Station’s renewal application and signal that it will not be a party to Banzhaf’s attempt to abuse the licensing process to gain leverage to silence accurate, truthful and fully-protected speech on the airwaves. -iv- TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ ii INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................2 I. THE OBJECTORS FAIL TO SHOW THAT THE STATION’S LICENSE SHOULD NOT BE RENEWED UNDER SECTION 309(K). ...............................7 A. The Objectors Fail to Show That Broadcasting the Redskins’ Team Name Contravenes the Public Interest, Convenience, and Necessity Standard in Section 309(k). .....................................................................................................8 B. The Objectors Fail to Demonstrate That the Station Has Violated Any Rule or Engaged in a Pattern of Abuse. ..........................................................................13 1. Broadcasting the Redskins’ Team Name Does Not Violate the Commission’s Rules Governing Obscenity or Indecency. .....................................................14 2. Broadcasting the Redskins’ Team Name Does Not Fall Within the FCC’s Narrow Authority To Regulate Profanity. ......................................................16 3. The Objectors’ “Hate Speech” Allegation Lacks Both Legal and Factual Basis................................................................................................................16 II. THE OBJECTORS FAIL TO RAISE A LEGITIMATE QUESTION REGARDING RED ZEBRA’S QUALIFICATIONS TO HOLD AN FCC LICENSE. ..............................................................................................................19 III. THE OBJECTORS FAIL TO MAKE A PRIMA FACIE CASE THAT THE STATION’S RENEWAL APPLICATION SHOULD BE DESIGNATED FOR A HEARING..............................................................................................................24 IV. REVOKING THE STATION’S LICENSE FOR BROADCASTING THE TERM REDSKINS ON THE RADIO WOULD BE UNLAWFUL. ................................25 A. Revoking the Station’s License for Broadcasting the Term Redskins Would Violate the First Amendment. ............................................................................25 B. Revoking the Station’s License for Broadcasting the Term Redskins Would Violate The Fifth Amendment. ..........................................................................29 C. Revoking the Station’s License for Broadcasting the Term Redskins Would Be Arbitrary and Capricious. ...................................................................................32 V. CONCLUSION ......................................................................................................33 -v- Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Application for Renewal of Broadcast Station ) FCC File No. BRH-20110601ACB License of ) ) (Facility ID No. 16819) Red Zebra Broadcasting Licensee, LLC ) Station WWXX(FM) ) Buckland, VA ) To: Secretary, Federal Communications Commission Attn: Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau RED ZEBRA BROADCASTING LICENSEE, LLC’S CONSOLIDATED RESPONSE TO INFORMAL OBJECTIONS Red Zebra Broadcasting Licensee, LLC (“Red Zebra”), the licensee of radio station WWXX(FM), Buckland, VA (Facility ID No. 16819) (“WWXX” or “the Station”),1 by its attorneys, hereby responds to the informal objections filed by John F. Banzhaf III (“Banzhaf”) on September 2, 2014 (the “Banzhaf Objection” or “Banzhaf Obj.”) and by Jay Winter Nightwolf (“Nightwolf”), Louis Ramon Grimaldi (“Grimaldi”), and Verona Iriarte (“Iriarte”) on October 13, 2014 (together, the “Nightwolf Objections,” and collectively with the Banzhaf Objection, the “Objections”)2 against the Station’s license renewal application. Should the Commission choose to entertain the Objections,3 its job is straightforward: to determine, on the merits, whether Red 1 Mr. Daniel Snyder, majority owner of the Washington Redskins, holds a controlling interest in the parent
Recommended publications
  • Valuation of NFL Franchises

    Valuation of NFL Franchises

    Valuation of NFL Franchises Author: Sam Hill Advisor: Connel Fullenkamp Acknowledgement: Samuel Veraldi Honors thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Graduation with Distinction in Economics in Trinity College of Duke University Duke University Durham, North Carolina April 2010 1 Abstract This thesis will focus on the valuation of American professional sports teams, specifically teams in the National Football League (NFL). Its first goal is to analyze the growth rates in the prices paid for NFL teams throughout the history of the league. Second, it will analyze the determinants of franchise value, as represented by transactions involving NFL teams, using a simple ordinary-least-squares regression. It also creates a substantial data set that can provide a basis for future research. 2 Introduction This thesis will focus on the valuation of American professional sports teams, specifically teams in the National Football League (NFL). The finances of the NFL are unparalleled in all of professional sports. According to popular annual rankings published by Forbes Magazine (http://www.Forbes.com/2009/01/13/nfl-cowboys-yankees-biz-media- cx_tvr_0113values.html), NFL teams account for six of the world’s ten most valuable sports franchises, and the NFL is the only league in the world with an average team enterprise value of over $1 billion. In 2008, the combined revenue of the league’s 32 teams was approximately $7.6 billion, the majority of which came from the league’s television deals. Its other primary revenue sources include ticket sales, merchandise sales, and corporate sponsorships. The NFL is also known as the most popular professional sports league in the United States, and it has been at the forefront of innovation in the business of sports.
  • Tobinick V. Novella

    Tobinick V. Novella

    No. 15-14889 _________________________ IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _________________________ EDWARD LEWIS TOBINICK, M.D., ET AL, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. STEVEN NOVELLA, M.D. Defendant-Appellee. _________________________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida; Case No. 9:14-CV-80781 The Honorable Robin L. Rosenburg _________________________ PROPOSED BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE THE REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS AND 24 MEDIA ORGANIZATIONS IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT-APPELLEE _________________________ J. Joshua Wheeler Hannah Bloch-Wehba Bruce D. Brown Counsel of Record THOMAS JEFFERSON CENTER Bruce D. Brown FOR THE PROTECTION OF FREE Gregg P. Leslie EXPRESSION & Michael J. Lambert THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR SCHOOL OF LAW FIRST FREEDOM OF THE PRESS AMENDMENT CLINIC 1156 15th St. NW, Suite 1250 400 Worrell Drive Washington, DC 20005 Charlottesville, VA 22911 Telephone: (202) 795-9300 Telephone: (434) 295–4784 Facsimile: (202) 795-9310 [email protected] Edward Tobinick, et al. v. Steven Novella No. 15-14889 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS Pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 26.1 and 28.1(b), undersigned counsel certifies that, in addition to the persons and entities identified in the briefs submitted to date in this appeal, the following have an interest in the outcome of the case: Alexander, Judy, Attorney for Amicus Curiae The Center for Investigative Reporting ALM Media, LLC, Amicus Curiae American Society of News Editors, Amicus Curiae Association of Alternative Newsmedia, Amicus Curiae Bailen, Mark I., Attorney for Amicus Curiae Society of Professional Journalists Bloch-Wehba, Hannah, Attorney for Amicus Curiae Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press Borg, Jennifer A., Attorney for Amicus Curiae North Jersey Media Group Inc.
  • Brief of Petitioner for FCC V. Fox Television Stations, 07-582

    Brief of Petitioner for FCC V. Fox Television Stations, 07-582

    No. 07-582 In the Supreme Court of the United States ________________ FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Petitioners, v. FOX TELEVISION STATIONS, INC., ET AL., Respondents. _________________ On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit _________________ AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF OF NATIONAL RELIGIOUS BROADCASTERS IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONERS ___________________ Craig L. Parshall Joseph C. Chautin III Counsel of Record Elise M. Stubbe General Counsel Mark A. Balkin National Religious Co-Counsel Broadcasters Hardy, Carey, Chautin 9510 Technology Dr. & Balkin, LLP Manassas, VA 20110 1080 West Causeway 703-331-4517 Approach Mandeville, LA 70471 985-629-0777 QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Amicus adopts the question presented as presented by Petitioner. The question presented for review is as follows: Whether the court of appeals erred in striking down the Federal Communications Commission’s determination that the broadcast of vulgar expletives may violate federal restrictions on the broadcast of “any obscene, indecent, or profane language,” 18 U.S.C. § 1464, see 47 C.F.R. § 73.3999, when the expletives are not repeated. i TABLE OF CONTENTS QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW .................i TABLE OF AUTHORITIES .......................................v INTEREST OF AMICUS CURIAE ............................x STATEMENT OF THE CASE .................................xii SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ..................................xii ARGUMENT ..............................................................1 I. THE FCC’S REASONS FOR ADJUSTING ITS INDECENCY POLICY WERE RATIONAL AND REASONABLE .....................1 A. The Court of Appeals Failed to Give the Required Deference and Latitude to the FCC ..................................................1 B. The FCC Gave Sufficient and Adequate Reasoning Why its Prior Indecency Policy Regarding Fleeting Expletives was Unworkable and Required Adjustment .................................3 1.
  • Menaquale, Sandy

    Menaquale, Sandy

    “Prejudice is a burden that confuses the past, threatens the future, and renders the present inaccessible.” – Maya Angelou “As long as there is racial privilege, racism will never end.” – Wayne Gerard Trotman “Not everything that is faced can be changed, but nothing can be changed until it is faced.” James Baldwin “Ours is not the struggle of one day, one week, or one year. Ours is not the struggle of one judicial appointment or presidential term. Ours is the struggle of a lifetime, or maybe even many lifetimes, and each one of us in every generation must do our part.” – John Lewis COLUMBIA versus COLUMBUS • 90% of the 14,000 workers on the Central Pacific were Chinese • By 1880 over 100,000 Chinese residents in the US YELLOW PERIL https://iexaminer.org/yellow-peril-documents-historical-manifestations-of-oriental-phobia/ https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/14/us/california-today-chinese-railroad-workers.html BACKGROUND FOR USA IMMIGRATION POLICIES • 1790 – Nationality and Citizenship • 1803 – No Immigration of any FREE “Negro, mulatto, or other persons of color” • 1848 – If we annex your territory and you remain living on it, you are a citizen • 1849 – Legislate and enforce immigration is a FEDERAL Power, not State or Local • 1854 – Negroes, Native Americans, and now Chinese may not testify against whites GERMAN IMMIGRATION https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/FT_15.09.28_ImmigationMapsGIF.gif?w=640 TO LINCOLN’S CREDIT CIVIL WAR IMMIGRATION POLICIES • 1862 – CIVIL WAR LEGISLATION ABOUT IMMIGRATION • Message to Congress December
  • A Comparative Study of French-Canadian and Mexican-American Contemporary Poetry

    A Comparative Study of French-Canadian and Mexican-American Contemporary Poetry

    A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF FRENCH-CANADIAN AND MEXICAN-AMERICAN CONTEMPORARY POETRY by RODERICK JAMES MACINTOSH, B.A., M.A. A DISSERTATION IN SPANISH Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Texas Tech University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OP PHILOSOPHY Approved Accepted May, 1981 /V<9/J^ ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am T«ry grateful to Dr. Edmundo Garcia-Giron for his direction of this dissertation and to the other mem­ bers of my committee, Dr. Norwood Andrews, Dr. Alfred Cismaru, Dr. Aldo Finco and Dr. Faye L. Bianpass, for their helpful criticism and advice. 11 ' V^-^'s;-^' CONTENTS ACKNOWI£DGMENTS n I. k BRIEF HISTORY OF QUE3EC 1 II• A BRIEF HISTORY OF MEXICAN-AMERICANS ^9 III. A LITERARY HISTORY OF QUEBEC 109 IV. A BRIEF OUTLINE OF ^MEXICAN LITERATURE 164 7» A LITERARY HISTORY OF HffiXICAN-AT/lERICANS 190 ' VI. A COMPARATIVE LOOK AT CANADZkll FRENCH AND MEXICAN-AMERICAN SPANISH 228 VII- CONTEMPORARY PRSNCK-CANADIAN POETRY 2^7 VIII. CONTEMPORARY TffiCICAN-AMERICAN POETRY 26? NOTES 330 BIBLIOGRAPHY 356 111 A BRIEF HISTORY OF QUEBEC In 153^ Jacques Cartier landed on the Gaspe Penin­ sula and established French sovereignty in North America. Nevertheless, the French did not take effective control of their foothold on this continent until 7^ years later when Samuel de Champlain founded the settlement of Quebec in 1608, at the foot of Cape Diamond on the St. Laurence River. At first, the settlement was conceived of as a trading post for the lucrative fur trade, but two difficul­ ties soon becam,e apparent—problems that have plagued French Canada to the present day—the difficulty of comirunication across trackless forests and m.ountainous terrain and the rigors of the Great Canadian Winter.
  • (FCC) Complaints About Saturday Night Live (SNL), 2019-2021 and Dave Chappelle, 11/1/2020-12/10/2020

    (FCC) Complaints About Saturday Night Live (SNL), 2019-2021 and Dave Chappelle, 11/1/2020-12/10/2020

    Description of document: Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Complaints about Saturday Night Live (SNL), 2019-2021 and Dave Chappelle, 11/1/2020-12/10/2020 Requested date: 2021 Release date: 21-December-2021 Posted date: 12-July-2021 Source of document: Freedom of Information Act Request Federal Communications Commission Office of Inspector General 45 L Street NE Washington, D.C. 20554 FOIAonline The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is a First Amendment free speech web site and is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source. Any concerns about the contents of the site should be directed to the agency originating the document in question. GovernmentAttic.org is not responsible for the contents of documents published on the website. Federal Communications Commission Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau Washington, D.C. 20554 December 21, 2021 VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL FOIA Nos.
  • Pizzagate / Pedogate, a No-Nonsense Fact-Filled Reader

    Pizzagate / Pedogate, a No-Nonsense Fact-Filled Reader

    Pizzagate / Pedogate A No-nonsense Fact-filled reader Preface I therefore determine that serious human rights abuse and corruption around the world constitute an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States, and I hereby declare a national emergency to deal with that threat. —Trump Executive Order 13818, Dec. 20, 2017 Pizzagate means many things to many people, the angle of the lens may be different, but the focus zeros in on a common body of incontestable facts. The fruit of top researchers collected in this reader allows you to compare, correlate and derive a flexible synthesis to suit your needs. An era of wild contradiction is upon us in the press. The psychopathic rumblings that pass for political discourse bring the artform of infotainment to a golden blossoming. A bookstore display table featuring The Fixers; The Bottom-Feeders, Crooked Lawyers, Gossipmongers, and Porn Stars Who Created the 45th President versus Witch Hunt; The Story of the Greatest Mass Delusion in American Political History are both talking about the same man, someone who paid for his campaign out of his own pocket. There were no big donors from China and the traditional bank of puppeteers. This created a HUGE problem, one whose solution threatened the money holders and influence peddlers. New leadership and a presidential order that threw down the gauntlet, a state of emergency, seeded the storm clouds. The starting gun was fired, all systems were go, the race had begun. FISAs and covert operations sprang into action. The envelopes are being delivered, the career decisions are being made, should I move on or stay the course.
  • Canadian Inclusive Language Glossary the Canadian Cultural Mosaic Foundation Would Like to Honour And

    Canadian Inclusive Language Glossary the Canadian Cultural Mosaic Foundation Would Like to Honour And

    Lan- guage De- Coded Canadian Inclusive Language Glossary The Canadian Cultural Mosaic Foundation would like to honour and acknowledgeTreaty aknoledgment all that reside on the traditional Treaty 7 territory of the Blackfoot confederacy. This includes the Siksika, Kainai, Piikani as well as the Stoney Nakoda and Tsuut’ina nations. We further acknowledge that we are also home to many Métis communities and Region 3 of the Métis Nation. We conclude with honoring the city of Calgary’s Indigenous roots, traditionally known as “Moh’Kinsstis”. i Contents Introduction - The purpose Themes - Stigmatizing and power of language. terminology, gender inclusive 01 02 pronouns, person first language, correct terminology. -ISMS Ableism - discrimination in 03 03 favour of able-bodied people. Ageism - discrimination on Heterosexism - discrimination the basis of a person’s age. in favour of opposite-sex 06 08 sexuality and relationships. Racism - discrimination directed Classism - discrimination against against someone of a different or in favour of people belonging 10 race based on the belief that 14 to a particular social class. one’s own race is superior. Sexism - discrimination Acknowledgements 14 on the basis of sex. 17 ii Language is one of the most powerful tools that keeps us connected with one another. iii Introduction The words that we use open up a world of possibility and opportunity, one that allows us to express, share, and educate. Like many other things, language evolves over time, but sometimes this fluidity can also lead to miscommunication. This project was started by a group of diverse individuals that share a passion for inclusion and justice.
  • Playing for Big Bucks

    Playing for Big Bucks

    alfresco 27 A WEEKLY DOSE OF QUICK, QUIRKY AND TRENDY INFORMATION SEPTEMBER 06-12, 2015 BURIED DEEP Playing for Big Bucks These 10 nations are all rich but hold massive debt as a percentage The value of professional sports franchises has always been pegged at massive amounts. The average value of their GDP: of the top 50 teams is estimated at $1.34 billion. Here is the list of top 10 most valuable sports teams of 2015: New York Yankees (baseball): $3.2 billion Owner: Steinbrenner Family 400% Japan Barcelona (football): Real Madrid (football): $3.16 billion $ 390 3.26 billion Owner: Club Members Owner: Club Members Ireland Los Angeles Lakers 382 (basketball): Dallas Cowboys Singapore $2.6 billion (American football): Owner: Jerry $3.2 billion Buss Family 358 Owner: Jerry Jones Trusts, Philip Portugal Manchester United Anschutz (football): $3.1 billion 327 Owner: Glazer Family Belgium 325 New England Patriotsts New York Knicks Netherlands (American football): (basketball): $2.6 billion $2.5 billion 317 Owner: Robert Kraft Owner: Madison Square Greece Garden Co. Los Angeles Dodgers 313 (baseball): Spain $2.4 billion Owner: Guggenheim 302 Baseball Management Denmark Bayern Munich Washingtonhi t Redskins R d ki (football): (American football): 290 $2.35 billion $2.4 billion Owner: Club Members Sweden Owner: Daniel Snyder SOURCE: IMF WORLD ECONOMIC OUTLOOK, BANK FOR INTERNATIONAL SETTLEMENTS AND HAVER ANALYTICS; DATA COMPILED SOURCE: FORBES, CHEATSHEET AS OF FEBRUARY 2015 WEEKLY VECTOR Flying Low Skytrax, a UK-based airline and airport review and ranking site, recently released the list for the world’s worst airlines.
  • Supreme Court of the United States ______FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, Et Al., Petitioners, V

    Supreme Court of the United States ______FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, Et Al., Petitioners, V

    No. 10-1293 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States _________ FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, et al., Petitioners, v. FOX TELEVISION STATIONS, INC., et al., Respondents. _________ On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit _________ BRIEF OF RESPONDENTS CENTER FOR CREATIVE VOICES IN MEDIA AND THE FUTURE OF MUSIC COALITION _________ *Andrew Jay Schwartzman Chrystiane B. Pereira Media Access Project 1625 K Street, NW Suite 1000 Washington, DC 20006 (202) 232-4300 [email protected] November 3, 2011 * Counsel of Record i QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the court of appeals properly determined that the Federal Communications Commission‘s (FCC) context-based indecency policy is unconsti- tutionally vague and accordingly unenforceable. ii CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Pursuant to Rule 26.1 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Center for Creative Voices in Media and Future of Music Coalition (jointly ―Cen- ter‖) respectfully submit this corporate disclosure statement. The Center of Creative Voices in Media does not have a parent company and no publicly held company owns 10 percent or more of stock therein. The Future of Music Coalition does not have a parent company and no publicly held company owns 10 percent or more of stock therein. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS QUESTION PRESENTED........................................... i CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT ............ ii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ....................................... iv STATEMENT .............................................................. 1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ..................................... 6 ARGUMENT ............................................................... 8 I. Nothing in Pacifica Authorizes the FCC‘s New Indecency Policy ...................... 9 A. Pacifica Was A Narrow Ruling Proceeding From the Expecta- tion That The Commission Would Tread Cautiously ..................... 10 B. The FCC‘s Impermissibly Va- gue New Policy Has Had A Chilling Effect ....................................
  • Press Release Redskins Name Ben Jacobs As Assistant

    Press Release Redskins Name Ben Jacobs As Assistant

    PRESS RELEASE For Immediate Release January 15, 2020 REDSKINS NAME BEN JACOBS AS ASSISTANT SPECIAL TEAMS COACH LOUDOUN COUNTY, Va. – The Washington Redskins announced today that they have named Ben Jacobs as assistant special teams coach. Jacobs is entering his second NFL season after joining the Carolina Panthers in 2019. A former NFL linebacker, Jacobs spent eight seasons as a key contributor on all four phases of special teams, recording 31 special teams tackles and eight tackles on defense in 73 career games played. Jacobs led or tied for the team high in special teams tackles in two of his seasons (2014 and 2018) with Carolina and helped the Panthers win the NFC Championship and advance to Super Bowl 50 during the 2015 season. In 2017, Jacobs played a significant role on a coverage unit that finished eighth in opponents’ punt return average, allowing just 5.9 yards per return. In 2016, Jacobs was part of a kickoff coverage unit that allowed a league-low 18.1 yards per kickoff return and finished fifth in the NFL with an opponents’ average drive start of the 23.7-yard line. Jacobs entered the NFL in 2011 with the Cleveland Browns as an undrafted free agent out of Fresno State. JACOBS FOOTBALL TIMELINE 2019: Assistant Special Teams Coach, Carolina Panthers 2013-18: Linebacker, Carolina Panthers 2011-12: Linebacker, Cleveland Browns 2006-10 Linebacker, Fresno State -REDSKINS- ABOUT THE REDSKINS: Headquartered at Inova Sports Performance Center at Redskins Park in Ashburn, Virginia, and owned by Daniel Snyder, the historic Washington Redskins Football Club has won five World Championship titles including the 1937 and 1942 National Football League Championship games, as well as Super Bowls XVII, XXII and XXVI.
  • No. 15-56090 in the UNITED STATES COURT of APPEALS for the NINTH CIRCUIT EUTIQUIO ACEVEDO MENDEZ, Et Al. Plaintiffs-Appellees, V

    No. 15-56090 in the UNITED STATES COURT of APPEALS for the NINTH CIRCUIT EUTIQUIO ACEVEDO MENDEZ, Et Al. Plaintiffs-Appellees, V

    Case: 15-56090, 03/30/2016, ID: 9921267, DktEntry: 28, Page 1 of 36 No. 15-56090 In The UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT EUTIQUIO ACEVEDO MENDEZ, et al. Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. THE CITY OF GARDENA, et al., Defendants-Appellants LOS ANGELES TIMES COMMUNICATIONS LLC et al., Intervenors and Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE THE REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS AND 26 MEDIA ORGANIZATIONS IN SUPPORT OF APPELLEES/INTERVENORS J. Joshua Wheeler Bruce D. Brown THOMAS JEFFERSON CENTER FOR THE Counsel of Record PROTECTION OF FREE EXPRESSION & Gregg P. Leslie THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA SCHOOL OF THE REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR LAW FIRST AMENDMENT CLINIC FREEDOM OF THE PRESS 400 Worrell Drive 1156 15th St. NW, Suite 1250 Charlottesville, VA 22911 Washington, DC 20005 Telephone: (434) 295–4784 Telephone: (202) 795-9302 [email protected] [email protected] Additional counsel on next page Case: 15-56090, 03/30/2016, ID: 9921267, DktEntry: 28, Page 2 of 36 Of counsel: Kevin M. Goldberg David M. Giles Fletcher, Heald & Hildreth, PLC Vice President/ 1300 N. 17th St., 11th Floor Deputy General Counsel Arlington, VA 22209 The E.W. Scripps Company Counsel for American Society of News 312 Walnut St., Suite 2800 Editors and Association of Cincinnati, OH 45202 Alternative Newsmedia Peter Scheer Allison Lucas First Amendment Coalition General Counsel and EVP Legal 534 Fourth St., Suite B Nabiha Syed San Rafael, CA 94901 Assistant General Counsel BuzzFeed Lynn Oberlander 200 Fifth Avenue, 8th Floor General Counsel, Media Operations New York, NY 10010 First Look Media, Inc.