DOCSLIB.ORG

Detection of Unregistered Buildings for Updating 2D Databases NEWPLATFORMS

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Detection of Unregistered Buildings for Updating 2D Databases NEWPLATFORMS European Spatial Data Research December 2009 Detection of Unregistered Buildings for Updating 2D Databases by Nicolas Champion NEWPLATFORMS - Unconventional Platforms (Unmanned Aircraft Systems) for Remote Sensing by Jurgen Everaerts Official Publication No 56 The present publication is the exclusive property of European Spatial Data Research All rights of translation and reproduction are reserved on behalf of EuroSDR. Published by EuroSDR Printed by Gopher, Amsterdam, The Netherlands EUROPEAN SPATIAL DATA RESEARCH PRESIDENT 2008 – 2010: Antonio Arozarena, Spain VICE-PRESIDENT PRESIDENT 2009 – 2011: Dieter Fritsch, Germany SECRETARY-GENERAL: Kevin Mooney, Ireland DELEGATES BY MEMBER COUNTRY: Austria: Michael Franzen Belgium: Ingrid Vanden Berghe; Jean Theatre Croatia: Željko Heimovi; Ivan Landek Cyprus: Christos Zenonos; Michael Savvides Denmark: Thorben Hansen; Lars Bodum Finland: Risto Kuittinen; Juha Vilhomaa France: Jean-Philippe Lagrange; Xavier Briottet Germany: Dietmar Grünreich; Klement Aringer; Dieter Fritsch Iceland: Magnús Guðmundsson; Eydís Líndal Finnbogadóttir Ireland: Colin Bray, Ned Dwyer Italy: Carlo Cannafoglia Netherlands: Jantien Stoter; Aart-jan Klijnjan Norway: Jon Arne Trollvik; Ivar Maalen-Johansen Spain: Antonio Arozarena, Francisco Papí Montanel Sweden: Anders Olsson; Anders Östman Switzerland: Francois Golay; André Streilein-Hurni United Kingdom: Malcolm Havercroft; Jeremy Morley COMMISSION CHAIRPERSONS: Sensors, Primary Data Acquisition and Georeferencing: Michael Cramer, Germany Image Analysis and Information Extraction: Juha Hyyppä, Finland Production Systems and Processes: André Streilein-Hurni, Switzerland Data Specifications: Ulf Sandgren, Sweden Network Services: Mike Jackson, United Kingdom OFFICE OF PUBLICATIONS: Bundesamt für Kartographie und Geodäsie (BKG) Publications Officer: Andreas Busch Richard-Strauss-Allee 11 60598 Frankfurt Germany Tel.: + 49 69 6333 312 Fax: + 49 69 6333 441 CONTACT DETAILS: Web: www.eurosdr.net President: [email protected] Secretary-General: [email protected] Secretariat: [email protected] EuroSDR Secretariat Faculty of the Built Environment Dublin Institute of Technology Bolton Street Dublin 1 Ireland Tel.: +353 1 4023933 The official publications of EuroSDR are peer-reviewed. Nicolas Champion: "Detection of Unregistered Buildings for Updating 2D Databases" .................... 7 ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................................ 9 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 9 2 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT ............................................................................................. 11 2.1 Description of Datasets .................................................................................................. 11 2.1.1 The Marseille Test Area ........................................................................................ 11 2.1.2 The Lyngby Test Area .......................................................................................... 12 2.1.3 The Toulouse Test Area ........................................................................................ 12 2.1.4 The Reference Building Database......................................................................... 13 2.2 Evaluation Procedure ...................................................................................................... 14 3 METHODS DESCRIPTION ......................................................................................................... 15 3.1 Method of Champion, 2007 ............................................................................................ 15 3.2 Method of Matikainen et al., 2007 .................................................................................. 16 3.3 Method of Olsen and Knudsen, 2005 ............................................................................. 17 3.4 Method of Rottensteiner, 2008 ....................................................................................... 18 4 RESULTS, EVALUATION AND DISCUSSION ......................................................................... 20 4.1 The Marseille Test Area ................................................................................................ 21 4.1.1 Method of Champion (2007): Outcomes and Discussion ..................................... 22 4.1.2 Method of Matikainen et al. (2007): Outcomes and Discussion ........................... 23 4.1.3 Method of Rottensteiner (2007 and 2008): Outcomes and Discussion ................. 23 4.1.4 Summary – Marseille ............................................................................................ 25 4.2 The Lyngby Test Area ................................................................................................... 25 4.2.1 Method of Matikainen et al. (2007): Outcomes and Discussion ........................... 25 4.2.2 Method of Olsen and Knudsen (2005): Outcomes and Discussion ....................... 26 4.2.3 Method of Rottensteiner (2008): Outcomes and Discussion................................. 28 4.2.4 Summary – Lyngby .............................................................................................. 29 4.3 The Toulouse Test Area ................................................................................................ 29 4.3.1 Method of Champion (2007): Outcomes and Discussion ..................................... 30 4.3.2 Method of Rottensteiner (2008): Outcomes and Discussion ................................ 30 4.3.3 Summary – Toulouse ............................................................................................ 31 5 OUTCOMES ANALYSIS AND OVERALL FINDINGS ............................................................ 32 5.1 Impact of the Size of a Change ....................................................................................... 32 5.2 Impact of the Quality of the Input Data .......................................................................... 32 5.2.1 Impact of DSM ...................................................................................................... 32 5.2.2 Impact of the DTM ................................................................................................ 34 5.3 Impact of the Other Topographic Objects in the Scene .................................................. 35 5.4 Impact of the Primitives Used in the System .................................................................. 36 6 CONCLUSION .............................................................................................................................. 38 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS..................................................................................................................... 39 REFERENCES ..................................................................................................................................... 39 A TEST OF 2D BUILDING CHANGE DETECTION METHODS: COMPARISON, EVALUATION AND PERSPECTIVES................................................................................................43 A TEST OF AUTOMATIC BUILDING CHANGE DETECTION APPROACHES............................49 Jurgen Everaerts: “Unconventional Platforms (Unmanned Aircraft Systems) for Remote Sensing” ............................................................................................................................. 57 ABSTRACT .......................................................................................................................................... 59 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 60 1 UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS ......................................................................................... 61 1.1 System, not aircraft ......................................................................................................... 61 1.2 Classification .................................................................................................................. 63 1.2.1 Based on size, mass and performance .................................................................. 63 1.2.2 Based on certification potential ............................................................................ 65 1.2.2.1 Light UAS – Class I ...................................................................................... 66 1.2.2.2 Light UAS - Class II ..................................................................................... 67 1.2.2.3 UAS under EASA regulation ........................................................................ 68 1.2.2.4 Balloons ........................................................................................................ 68 1.3 UAS evolution in the past 6 years .................................................................................. 68 2 THE LEGISLATIVE PERSPECTIVE .......................................................................................... 71 2.1 ICAO .............................................................................................................................. 72 2.2 EASA .............................................................................................................................. 73 2.3 EUROCONTROL .........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Order 7340.1Z, Contractions
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CHANGE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 7340.1Z CHG 2 SUBJ: CONTRACTIONS 1. PURPOSE. This change transmits revised pages to change 2 of Order 7340.1Z, Contractions. 2. DISTRIBUTION. This change is distributed to select offices in Washington and regional headquarters, the William J. Hughes Technical Center, and the Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center; all air traffic field offices and field facilities; all airway facilities field offices; all international aviation field offices, airport district offices, and flight standards district offices; and the interested aviation public. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. October 25, 2007. 4. EXPLANATION OF CHANGES. Cancellations, additions, and modifications are listed in the CAM section of this change. Changes within sections are indicated by a vertical bar. 5. DISPOSITION OF TRANSMITTAL. Retain this transmittal until superseded by a new basic order. 6. PAGE CONTROL CHART. See the Page Control Chart attachment. Michael A. Cirillo Vice President, System Operations Services Air Traffic Organization Date: __________________ Distribution: ZAT-734, ZAT-464 Initiated by: AJR-0 Vice President, System Operations Services 10/25/07 7340.1Z CHG 2 PAGE CONTROL CHART REMOVE PAGES DATED INSERT PAGES DATED CAM-1-1 and CAM-1-10 07/05/07 CAM-1-1 and CAM-1-10 10/25/07 1-1-1 03/15/07 1-1-1 10/25/07 3-1-11 03/15/07 3-1-11 03/15/07 3-1-12 03/15/07 3-1-12 10/25/07 3-1-23 03/15/07 3-1-23 03/15/07 3-1-24 03/15/07 3-1-24 10/25/07 3-1-31 03/15/07 3-1-31 03/15/07 3-1-32 through 3-1-34 03/15/07 3-1-32 through
    [Show full text]
  • AIR PILOT MASTER 3/6/19 09:01 Page 1 2 Airpilot JUNE 2019 ISSUE 33 AIR PILOT June 2019:AIR PILOT MASTER 3/6/19 09:01 Page 2
    AIR PILOT June 2019:AIR PILOT MASTER 3/6/19 09:01 Page 1 2 AirPilot JUNE 2019 ISSUE 33 AIR PILOT June 2019:AIR PILOT MASTER 3/6/19 09:01 Page 2 Diary JUNE 2019 AIR PILOT 3rd Pilot Aptitude Testing RAF College, Cranwell THE HONOURABLE 13th GP&F Air Pilots House (APH) COMPANY OF 19th AST/APT APH AIR PILOTS 26th T&A Committee APH incorporating Air Navigators PATRON: JULY 2019 His Royal Highness 4th ACEC APH The Prince Philip 15th Summer Supper Stationers’ Hall Duke of Edinburgh KG KT 18th GP&F APH GRAND MASTER: 18th Court Cutlers’ Hall His Royal Highness The Prince Andrew Duke of York KG GCVO MASTER: Malcolm G F White OBE CLERK: Paul J Tacon BA FCIS Incorporated by Royal Charter. A Livery Company of the City of London. PUBLISHED BY: The Honourable Company of Air Pilots, VISITS PROGRAMME Air Pilots House, 52A Borough High Street, Please see the flyers accomp anying this issue of Air Pilot or contact Liveryman David London SE1 1XN Curgenven at [email protected]. These flyers can also be downloaded from the Company's website. EDITOR: Please check on the Company website for visits that are to be confirmed. Paul Smiddy BA (Econ) ,FCA EMAIL: [email protected] FUNCTION PHOTOGRAPHY: Gerald Sharp Photography GOLF CLUB EVENTS View images and order prints on-line. Please check on Company website for latest information TELEPHONE: 020 8599 5070 EMAIL: [email protected] WEBSITE: www.sharpphoto.co.uk PRINTED BY: Printed Solutions Ltd 01494 478870 Except where specifically stated, none of the material in this issue is to be taken as expressing the opinion of the Court of the Company.
    [Show full text]
  • Aircraft Type Designators by Manufacturer
    ECCAIRS 4.2.8 Data Definition Standard Aircraft type designators by manufacturer The ECCAIRS 4 aircrafts type designators are based on ICAO's ADREP 2000 taxonomy. They have been organised at two hierarchical levels. Note that for FlightOps purposes there is a separate table 'Aircraft Make Model' 17 September 2010 Page 1 of 127 ECCAIRS 4 Aircrafts type designators Data Definition Standard A.V.Roe & Company (United Kingdom) 20400 A504 A504 : 504, Replica 20401 AVIN AVIN : 594, 616 Avian 20402 TUTR TUTR : 621 Tutor 20403 ANSN ANSN : 652 Anson 20404 LANC LANC : 683 Lancaster 20405 SHAC SHAC : 696 Shackleton 20406 A748 A748 : 748 (C-91) 20407 RJ70 RJ70 : RJ-70 Avroliner 20408 RJ85 RJ85 : RJ-85 Avroliner 20409 RJ1H RJ1H : RJ-100 Avroliner 20410 A.V.Roe & Company Ltd (United Kingdom) 20500 A504 A504 : 504, Replica 20501 AVIN AVIN : 594, 616 Avian 20502 TUTR TUTR : 621 Tutor 20503 ANSN ANSN : 652 Anson 20504 LANC LANC : 683 Lancaster 20505 SHAC SHAC : 696 Shackleton 20506 A748 A748 : 748 (C-91) 20507 RJ70 RJ70 : RJ-70 Avroliner 20508 RJ85 RJ85 : RJ-85 Avroliner 20509 RJ1H RJ1H : RJ-100 Avroliner 20510 AAC Amphibian Airplanes of Canada (Canada) 100 PETR PETR : SeaStar 101 AB Malmö Flygindustri (Sweden) 82400 JUNR JUNR : MFI-9 Junior 82401 MF10 MF10 : MFI-10 Vipan 82402 AB Radab (Sweden) 106900 WDEX WDEX : Windex 106901 ABS Aircraft (Germany) 500 RF9 RF9 : RF-9 501 ABS Aircraft AG (Switzerland) 600 RF9 RF9 : RF-9 601 ACE 10000 SPGY SPGY : BABY ACE MODEL D 10001 STAL STAL : Stallion, Super Stallion 10002 Ace Aircraft Manufacturing and Supply (United
    [Show full text]
  • Pilóta Nélküli Repülés Profiknak És Amatőröknek
    Pilóta nélküli repülés profiknak és amatőröknek Szerkesztette Dr. Palik Mátyás Második, javított kiadás Pilóta nélküli repülés profiknak és amatőröknek Második javított kiadás © A Szerzők, 2013 © Nemzeti Közszolgálati Egyetem, 2013 Szerkesztő: Dr. Palik Mátyás Lektorok: Prof. Dr. Kovács László Prof. Dr. Óvári Gyula Olvasószerkesztő: Nagy Imréné Műszaki szerkesztő és ábrarajzoló: Dr. Szilvássy László A borítót készítette: Jámbor Krisztián A kiadvány szerzői: Dr. Békési Bertold, Dr. Bottyán Zsolt, Dr. Dunai Pál, Halászné dr. Tóth Alexandra, Prof. Dr. Makkay Imre, Dr. Palik Mátyás, Dr. Restás Ágoston, Dr. Wührl Tibor ISBN 978-615-5057-64-9 Kiadó: Nemzeti Közszolgálati Egyetem TÁMOP-4.2.1.B-11/2/KMR-2011-0001 Kritikus infrastruktúra védelmi kutatások „A projekt az Európai Unió támogatásával, az Európai Szociális Alap társfinanszírozásával valósul meg”. A könyv „A pilóta nélküli légijárművek alkalmazásának légiközlekedés-biztonsági aspektusai” című kiemelt kutatási terület támogatásával készült el. TARTALOM TARTALOM ELŐSZÓ ...................................................................................................................................... 7 MOTTÓ ....................................................................................................................................... 9 BEVEZETÉS ............................................................................................................................. 11 UAV, DRONE, RPV, RPA, UAS, RPAS, UCAV, UCAS – ÉS AMI MÖGÖTTÜK VAN .. 11 EBBŐL ÉLNI – VAGY EZÉRT ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Unmanned Aircraft Systems Uavs Design, Development and Deployment
    P1: OTE/OTE/SPH P2: OTE FM JWBK459-Austin March 19, 2010 12:44 Printer Name: Yet to Come UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS UAVS DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT AND DEPLOYMENT Reg Austin Aeronautical Consultant A John Wiley and Sons, Ltd., Publication P1: OTE/OTE/SPH P2: OTE FM JWBK459-Austin March 19, 2010 12:44 Printer Name: Yet to Come P1: OTE/OTE/SPH P2: OTE FM JWBK459-Austin March 19, 2010 12:44 Printer Name: Yet to Come UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS P1: OTE/OTE/SPH P2: OTE FM JWBK459-Austin March 19, 2010 12:44 Printer Name: Yet to Come Aerospace Series List Path Planning Strategies for Cooperative Tsourdos et al August 2010 Autonomous Air Vehicles Introduction to Antenna Placement & Installation Macnamara April 2010 Principles of Flight Simulation Allerton October 2009 Aircraft Fuel Systems Langton et al May 2009 The Global Airline Industry Belobaba April 2009 Computational Modelling and Simulation of Diston April 2009 Aircraft and the Environment: Volume 1 - Platform Kinematics and Synthetic Environment Handbook of Space Technology Ley, Wittmann, Hallmann April 2009 Aircraft Performance Theory and Practice for Pilots Swatton August 2008 Surrogate Modelling in Engineering Design: Forrester, Sobester, Keane August 2008 A Practical Guide Aircraft Systems, 3rd Edition Moir & Seabridge March 2008 Introduction to Aircraft Aeroelasticity And Loads Wright & Cooper December 2007 Stability and Control of Aircraft Systems Langton September 2006 Military Avionics Systems Moir & Seabridge February 2006 Design and Development of Aircraft Systems Moir & Seabridge June
    [Show full text]
  • Unmanned Aircraft Systems
    REFERENCE SECTION Unmanned Aircraft Systems ALL CATEGORIES & CLASSES Country Producer (s) / Developer(s) System Category Remarks Class Air- Status Max. Endu- Range MTOW Payload Designation frame Speed rance Capacity (km/h) (hours) (km) Max. (kg) 01 Argentina AeroDreams UAV ADS-101 Strix 02-Mini CC FW z 45 02 Argentina AeroDreams UAV ADS-301 Nancu 02-Mini CC FW z 115 03 Argentina AeroDreams UAV ADS-401 02-Mini CC FW z 04 Argentina Argentine Army Lipan M3 03-CR M FW z 180 5 40 60 20 05 Argentina Air Force Proyecto UAV Etapa 1 03-CR M FW z 213(CS) 8 300 50 06 Argentina Air Force Proyecto UAV Etapa 2 04-SR M FW \ 15 30 07 Argentina Air Force Proyecto UAV Etapa 3 10-HALE M FW \ 3 month 100 08 Argentina Nostromo Defensa Centinela 02-Mini Electric M RW z 40 1 8 1,4 09 Argentina Nostromo Defensa Cabure 02-Mini Electric M FW 1 3,5 10 Argentina Nostromo Defensa Yagua E 02-Mini Electric M FW z 1,5 12 11 Argentina Nostromo Defensa Yagua C 02-Mini Combustion M FW z 16 12 12 Argentina Nostromo Defensa Yarara B 04-SR M FW \z 150 4 20 22 5 13 Argentina Nostromo Defensa Yarara C 04-SR M FW z 147 6 50 30 7 14 Australia AAI Corp - Aerosonde Aerosonde Mk III & IV 08-LALE CC FW S 150+ 24+ 3000+ 15 Up to 5 15 Australia ADI (Thales subsidiary) Cybird-2 04-SR M FW 420 1,5 16 Australia ADI (Thales subsidiary) Jandu 04-SR M FW 350 4+ 35+ 17 Australia ADRO Pelican Observer 03-CR CC FW z 220 1-12 27,2 13,6 18 Australia AeroCam Australia Trainer 02-Mini CC FW S 2,5 19 Australia AeroCam Australia Shadow UAV 02-CR CC FW z 90 25 20 Australia BAE Systems Nulka 03-CR
    [Show full text]
  • Estudio Para El Uso De Bandas De Frecuencia En La Operación De
    ESTUDIO PARA EL USO DE BANDAS DE FRECUENCIA EN LA OPERACIÓN DE SISTEMAS DE AERONAVES NO TRIPULADAS PARA USOS COMERCIALES Y CVILES DE ACUERDO AL CUADRO NACIONAL DE ATRIBUCIÓN DE BANDAS DE FRECUENCIA CNABF 2014 EN COLOMBIA. JHON EDUAR BONILLA CABALLERO JUAN PABLO SAINEA MORENO UNIVERSIDAD DISTRITAL FRANCISCO JOSÉ DE CALDAS FACULTAD TECNOLÓGICA INGENIERIA EN TELECOMUNICACIONES BOGOTÁ 2016 ESTUDIO PARA EL USO DE BANDAS DE FRECUENCIA EN LA OPERACIÓN DE SISTEMAS DE AERONAVES NO TRIPULADAS PARA USOS COMERCIALES Y CI- VILES DE ACUERDO AL CUADRO NACIONAL DE ATRIBUCIÓN DE BANDAS DE FRECUENCIA CNABF 2014 EN COLOMBIA. Jhon Eduar Bonilla Caballero Juan Pablo Sainea Moreno Trabajo de grado para optar el título de Ingeniería en telecomunicaciones GIOVANI MANCILLA GAONA Profesor e Investigador de la Universidad Distrital UNIVERSIDAD DISTRITAL FRANCISCO JOSÉ DE CALDAS FACULTAD TECNOLÓGICA INGENIERIA EN TELECOMUNICACIONES BOGOTÁ 2016 Nota de aceptación ________________________ ________________________ ________________________ ________________________ Giovani Mancilla Gaona ________________________ Jurado ________________________ Jurado A todas aquellas personas Que nos brindaron su apoyo, Ánimo y colaboración. En especial a Rafael Niño. AGRADECIMIENTOS Nos complace y llena de alegría culminar con la propuesta investigativa que se planteó para el presente trabajo de grado. Dicho trabajo, no hubiera sido posible sin la colaboración de nuestro tutor Giovani Mancilla, a quien agradecemos por alentar en los momentos más complicados del proceso y ayudarnos con ideas para la formulación del trabajo de grado; además de guiarnos durante todo su desarrollo. Queremos agradecer de manera especial a Rafael Niño funcionario de la ANE por sus aportes e interés, los cuales fueron de gran ayuda para despejar dudas y poder consolidar los resultados de la investigación.
    [Show full text]
  • February 2020 Issue 37 Ai Rpi Lo T
    FEBRUARY 2020 ISSUE 37 AI RPI LO T INSIDE... FLYING SCHOLARSHIPS AVIATION MUSEUMS IN THE UNITED STATES VINTAGE AIRCRAFT FLYPAST 601 SQUADRON DIARY FEBRUARY 2020 THE HONOURABLE COMPANY 12th Archives lecture Air Pilots’ House (APH) OF AIR PILOTS 20th GP&F APH incorporating Air Navigators 24th Pilot Aptitude Testing RAFC Cranwell PATRON: MARCH 2020 His Royal Highness The Prince Philip 11th Instructors Working Group APH Duke of Edinburgh KG KT 12th GP&F APH Court Cutlers’ Hall GRAND MASTER: His Royal Highness 16th AGM Merchant Taylors’ Hall The Prince Andrew Duke of York KG GCVO APRIL 2020 MASTER: 2nd Combined Courts Lunch Cutlers’ Hall Malcolm G F White OBE 15th ACEC APH 16th New Members’ Briefing APH CLERK: Paul J Tacon BA FCIS GP&F APH Assistants’ Dinner Cutlers’ Hall Incorporated by Royal Charter. 21st APBF APH A Livery Company of the City of London. 22nd Lunch Club RAF Club PUBLISHED BY: Cobham Lecture RAF Club The Honourable Company of Air Pilots, 29th Archives Lecture APH Air Pilots House, 52A Borough High Street, 30th AST/APT APH London SE1 1XN EMAIL : [email protected] www.airpilots.org EDITOR: VISITS PROGRAMME Paul Smiddy BA (Econ), FCA Please see the flyers accompanying this issue of EMAIL: [email protected] Air Pilot or contact Liveryman David Curgenven at EDITORIAL CONTRIBUTIONS: [email protected] . These flyers can also be The copy deadline for the April 2020 edition of Air Pilot downloaded from the Company's website. Please check is 1 March 2019. on the Company website for visits that are to be confirmed. FUNCTION PHOTOGRAPHY: Gerald Sharp Photography View images and order prints on-line.
    [Show full text]
  • Advisory Circular AC 140-7N FAA CERTIFICATED REPAIR
    Advisory Circular AC 140-7N FAA CERTIFICATED REPAIR STATIONS DIRECTORY Revised 2003 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION Flight Standards Service Regulatory Support Division For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, DC 20402 Advisory Circular Subject: FAA CERTIFICATED REPAIR Date: 9/9/03 AC No: 140-7N STATIONS DIRECTORY Initiated by: AFS-640 Change: 1. PURPOSE. This advisory circular (AC) transmits a consolidated directory of all Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) certificated repair stations. The repair stations were certificated under the authority of Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 145, and the directory is current as of August 28, 2003. 2. CANCELLATIONS. AC 140-7M, FAA Certificated Repair Stations Directory, dated August 23, 2002, is canceled. 3. DESCRIPTION. Appendix 1 contains a list of repair stations, their addresses, ratings, and codes. 4. FAA CERTIFICATED REPAIR STATIONS RATING LEGENDS, CODES, AND EXPLANATIONS. (a) AF—Airframe 1—composite construction, small aircraft 2—composite construction, large aircraft 3—all metal construction, small aircraft 4—all metal construction, large aircraft (b) PP—Powerplant 1—reciprocating engines, 400 hp or less 2—reciprocating engines, more than 400 hp 3—turbine engines (c) PRP—Propeller 1—fixed pitch and ground adjustable propellers - wood, metal, or composite 2—all other propellers, by make (d) RAD—Radio 1—communication equipment 2—navigation equipment 3—radar equipment (e) INS—Instrument 1—mechanical 2—electrical 3—gyroscopic 4—electronic AC 140-7N 9/9/03 (f) AAC—Accessory 1—mechanical 2—electrical 3—electronic (g) L—Limited AAC—accessories AF—airframe EE—emergency equipment FAB—aircraft fabric FLO —floats INS—instruments LG—landing gear NDT—nondestructive testing OT—other PP—powerplant PRP—propellers RAD—radio equipment RB—rotor blades SS—specialized (h) Ratings may be limited to a specific model of aircraft, powerplant, propeller, radio, instrument, accessory, or parts thereof.
    [Show full text]
  • UAVS, UK - EUROCAE, France - UVS Canada - UVS Norway - European Institute, USA - UVS N
    Federating The International UAS Community EASA UAS Workshop Paris, France – Feb 1, 2008 UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS The Current Situation Peter van Blyenburgh Slide 01/31 Feb 1, 2008 Federating The International What is UVS International? UAS Community 1997 Non-profit association founded in Paris, France as Euro UVS 1999 EURO UVS is registered in Den Haag, The Netherlands 2004 Changed its name to UVS International – Global Scope 2007 256 Corporate & Institutional Members in 35 countries 108 Honorary Members - 24 countries & 7 international orgs Reps of nat. mil. & CAAs + EASA + EDA + EUROCONTROL + FAA + NATO Operates: Out of offices in Paris, France www.uvs-info.com World’s largest open generic UAS web site Slide 02/31 Feb 1, 2008 Federating The MEMBERS IN 35 COUNTRIES International UAS Community Argentina Greece Russian Fed. Australia Hungary Singapore Austria India Slovenia Belgium Indonesia South Africa Botswana Israel South Korea Canada Italy Spain China Japan Sweden Czech Rep. Luxembourg Switzerland Denmark Netherlands Turkey Finland New Zealand UK France Norway USA Germany Portugal = Honorary Mbrs Working Groups UAV DACH Member of =Members Instigated by UVSI IWGSUAS RTCA SC 203 ESCO-UAS Partner Organizations - AESiNT, Spain - ALV, Czech Rep. Mutual Memberships - AVSB, Czech Rep - CGArm, France - Eurocontrol EC, France - Eurosatory - ATCA, USA - INTELI, Portugal - Japan UAV Association - EUGIN, Belgium - PEMA UAV, Portugal - UAVS, UK - EUROCAE, France - UVS Canada - UVS Norway - European Institute, USA - UVS N. Zealand Australia Slide 03/31 Feb 1, 2008 Federating The UAS – Unmanned Aircraft System International UAS Community Non-Recreational Purposes Unmanned aircraft (UA) An aircraft designed to operate with no human pilot on board.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of the European UAS Community
    FEATURE ARTICLES Overview of the European UAS Community By Peter van Blyenburgh During the European Commission’s Hearing on Light UAS, The European UAS manufacturers/developers have been refe- which took place in the offices of the Directorate General of Mo- renced in two categories: bility Brussels, Belgium on October 19, 2009, UVS International - Manufacturers/developers of Light UAS (MOTM <150 kg); presented the conclusions of a survey on the non-military ap- - Manufacturers/developers of UAS (MTOM >150 kg). plications of Light UAS, that it had conducted. 120 companies and organizations in 27 countries, 3 international associations, This categorization has been made in such a way that the UAS 1 international regulatory authority, and 2 multi-national working with a maximum take-off mass (MOTM) of less than 150 kg, groups participated in this survey. which are subject to national certification rules, and the UAS with a MTOM are more than 150 kg, which are subject to cer- The following 17 UAS stakeholder groups were represented: tification by the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), are - Flight service provider - Flight service customer clearly identified. - Governmental entities - Governmental research - Governmental UAS operator - Industry Furthermore, this categorization makes it possible to make - International association - National association clear the rather incredible number of Light UAS currently under - Multi-national working group - Regulatory authority development, and already market ready. - Regulatory service provider - Standards organization - Small & Medium-sized Enterprise - University UAS which are no longer in production (a few of which are still - UAS Test & Evaluation in service) have been listed separately for reference purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • UAV Design, Development and Deployment
    P1: OTE/OTE/SPH P2: OTE FM JWBK459-Austin March 19, 2010 12:44 Printer Name: Yet to Come UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS UAVS DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT AND DEPLOYMENT Reg Austin Aeronautical Consultant A John Wiley and Sons, Ltd., Publication P1: OTE/OTE/SPH P2: OTE FM JWBK459-Austin March 19, 2010 12:44 Printer Name: Yet to Come P1: OTE/OTE/SPH P2: OTE FM JWBK459-Austin March 19, 2010 12:44 Printer Name: Yet to Come UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS P1: OTE/OTE/SPH P2: OTE FM JWBK459-Austin March 19, 2010 12:44 Printer Name: Yet to Come Aerospace Series List Path Planning Strategies for Cooperative Tsourdos et al August 2010 Autonomous Air Vehicles Introduction to Antenna Placement & Installation Macnamara April 2010 Principles of Flight Simulation Allerton October 2009 Aircraft Fuel Systems Langton et al May 2009 The Global Airline Industry Belobaba April 2009 Computational Modelling and Simulation of Diston April 2009 Aircraft and the Environment: Volume 1 - Platform Kinematics and Synthetic Environment Handbook of Space Technology Ley, Wittmann, Hallmann April 2009 Aircraft Performance Theory and Practice for Pilots Swatton August 2008 Surrogate Modelling in Engineering Design: Forrester, Sobester, Keane August 2008 A Practical Guide Aircraft Systems, 3rd Edition Moir & Seabridge March 2008 Introduction to Aircraft Aeroelasticity And Loads Wright & Cooper December 2007 Stability and Control of Aircraft Systems Langton September 2006 Military Avionics Systems Moir & Seabridge February 2006 Design and Development of Aircraft Systems Moir & Seabridge June
    [Show full text]