DOCSLIB.ORG

MHSDS User Guidance

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MHSDS User Guidance MHSDS User Guidance Mental Health Service Data Set Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................. 12 Including patients in the MHSDS extract ................................................................................................................ 12 Excluding patients from the MHSDS extract ........................................................................................................... 12 MHS000 MHSDS Header ........................................................................................................................................... 12 M000010 Data Set Version Number ....................................................................................................................... 12 M000080 Organisation Identifier (code of provider)................................................................................................ 12 M000090 Organisation Identifier (code of submitting organisation) ....................................................................... 12 M000040 Primary Data Collection System In Use .................................................................................................. 12 M000050 Reporting Period Start Date .................................................................................................................... 13 M000060 Reporting Period End Date ..................................................................................................................... 13 M000070 Date and Time Data Set Created ............................................................................................................ 13 MHS001 Master Patient Index .................................................................................................................................... 13 M001901 Local Patient Identifier (Extended) .......................................................................................................... 13 M001170 Organisation Identifier (local patient identifier) ....................................................................................... 13 M001180 Organisation Identifier (residence responsibility) .................................................................................... 13 M001190 Organisation Identifier (educational establishment) ................................................................................ 13 M001040 NHS Number ........................................................................................................................................... 13 M001050 NHS Number Status Indicator Code ....................................................................................................... 13 M001060 Person Birth Date .................................................................................................................................... 13 M001070 Postcode of Usual Address ..................................................................................................................... 13 M001090 Person Stated Gender Code ................................................................................................................... 14 M001150 Person Marital Status .............................................................................................................................. 14 ©TPP 2018 – Commercial in confidence Please note: All patient data shown in this document is fictitious. These instructions are correct at the date of writing. For further assistance, consult the SystmOne Online Help. M001100 Ethnic Category ....................................................................................................................................... 14 M001120 Language Code (Preferred) .................................................................................................................... 16 M001130 Person Death Date.................................................................................................................................. 25 MHS002 GP Practice Registration ............................................................................................................................. 25 M002901 Local Patient Identifier (Extended) .......................................................................................................... 25 M002010 General Medical Practice Code (Patient Registration) ........................................................................... 25 M002020 Start Date (GMP Patient Registration) .................................................................................................... 25 M002030 End Date (GMP Patient Registration) ..................................................................................................... 26 M002050 Organisation Identifier (GP Practice Responsibility) ............................................................................... 26 MHS003 Accommodation Status ................................................................................................................................ 26 M003901 Local Patient Identifier (Extended) .......................................................................................................... 26 M003010 Accommodation Status Code ................................................................................................................. 26 M003020 Settled Accommodation Indicator ........................................................................................................... 29 M003030 Accommodation Status Recorded Date .................................................................................................. 29 M003040 Secure Children’s Home Placement Type .............................................................................................. 29 MHS004 Employment Status ...................................................................................................................................... 29 M004901 Local Patient Identifier (Extended) .......................................................................................................... 29 M004010 Employment Status ................................................................................................................................. 30 M004020 Employment Status Recorded Date ........................................................................................................ 30 M004030 Weekly Hours Worked ............................................................................................................................ 30 MHS005 Patient Indicators ......................................................................................................................................... 31 M005901 Local Patient Identifier (Extended) .......................................................................................................... 31 M005010 Constant Supervision and Care Required Due to Disability Indicator .................................................... 31 M005020 Young Carer Indicator ............................................................................................................................. 31 M005030 Looked After Child Indicator .................................................................................................................... 31 M005040 Child Protection Plan Indication Code .................................................................................................... 32 M005100 Ex-British Armed Forces Indicator .......................................................................................................... 32 M005110 Offence History Indication Code ............................................................................................................. 32 M005120 Parental responsibilities indicator ........................................................................................................... 33 M005050 Prodrome Psychosis Date ...................................................................................................................... 33 M005060 Emergent Psychosis Date ....................................................................................................................... 33 M005070 Manifest Psychosis Date ......................................................................................................................... 33 M005080 First Prescription Date (Anti-psychotic medication) ................................................................................ 33 M005090 Psychosis First Treatment Start Date ..................................................................................................... 33 MHS006 Mental Health Care Coordinator .................................................................................................................. 34 M006901 Local Patient Identifier (Extended) .......................................................................................................... 34 M006010 Start Date (Mental Health Care Coordinator Assignment Period) .......................................................... 34 M006908 Care Professional Local Identifier ........................................................................................................... 34 M006030 End Date (Mental Health Care Coordinator Assignment Period) ..........................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Diplomarbeit
    DIPLOMARBEIT Titel der Diplomarbeit Historische und ethnographische Betrachtungen der Sprachenpolitik Namibias Verfasser Reinhard Mayerhofer angestrebter akademischer Grad Magister der Philosophie (Mag. phil.) Wien, 2011 Studienkennzahl lt. Studienblatt: A 328 Studienrichtung lt. Studienblatt: Allgem./Angew. Sprachwissenschaft Betreuer: ao. Univ.-Prof. Dr. Rudolf de Cillia Inhaltsverzeichnis Danksagungen 5 Einleitung 7 1. Linguistik und Kolonialismus 1.1. Linguistische Prozesse der Kolonisierung 1.1.1. Die Vorgeschichte des Kolonialismus 11 1.1.2. Der Prozess der Kolonisierung 13 1.1.3. Die Folgen der Kolonisierung 16 1.2. Identität – Kultur – Ideologie 19 1.3. Europäischer und afrikanischer Kulturbegriff 21 2. Methoden 2.1. Einleitung 26 2.2. Sprachenportraits 28 2.3. Das narrativ-biographische Interview 2.3.1. Interviewführung 30 2.3.2. Auswertung 31 2.4. Ethnographie des Sprachwechsels 32 2.5. Methodisches Resümee 34 3. Historische Betrachtungen I: Geschichte Namibias 37 3.1. Das staatslose Namibia 3.1.1. Frühe Geschichte 39 3.1.2. Missionen 43 3.2. Kolonisierung durch das deutsche Kaiserreich (1884-1915) 3.2.1. Bildung „Deutsch-Südwestafrikas“ 46 3.2.2. Hochphase der deutschen Kolonisierung 50 3.3. Erster und Zweiter Weltkrieg 53 3.4. Apartheid 56 3.4.1. Bantu-Education: Das Bildungssystem der Apartheid 57 3.4.2. Bewaffneter Widerstand, UNO-Sanktionen und Unabhängigkeit 63 3.5. Die ersten Jahre der Unabhängigkeit (1990-2000) 67 4. Historische Betrachtungen II: Sprachenpolitik in Namibia 4.1. Koloniale Sprachenpolitik 71 4.2. Postkoloniale Sprachenpolitik 77 3 5. Ethnographische Betrachtungen: Jüngste Entwicklungen und aktuelle Situation 5.1. Biographische Analyse 5.1.1. Überblick: Sprachverteilung in den Portraits 84 5.1.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Beck Sociolinguistic Profile Herero
    SOCIOLINGUISTIC PROFILE OTJIHERERO IN NAMIBIA AND IN OMATJETE ROSE MARIE BECK Sociolinguistic profiles vary in scope, depth, differentiation etc. For the following pro- file I have chosen 11 aspects, of which it will not be possible to answer all of them with information pertaining to the Omatjete area (see map on p. 3). Much of what I write here is based on Rajmund Ohly‘s excellent sociolinguistic history of Herero (—The destabilization of the Herero language, 1987). Where it was possible I have in- cluded information specific to Omatjete. Aspects of a sociolinguistic profile 1. Classification, dialectal variation and differentiation, regional distribution, num- ber of speakers 2. Linguistic features: phonolgoy, morphology, syntax, lexicon (often with special reference to loanwords) 3. Who speaks it? 4. With which proficiency (L1, L2, L3 …) Grammatical, functional, cultural, ora- ture/literature? 5. Literacy 6. Domains (i.e. ”socio-culturally recognized spheres of activity‘ in which a lan- guage is used, a —social nexus which brings people together primarily for a cluster of purposes - … and primarily for a certain set of role-relations“ (Fishman 1965:72; 75). Spheres of activities may be: home, village, church, school, shop/market, recreation, wider communication, government and ad- ministration, work 7. Language attitudes and choice 8. Multilingualism and polyglossia 9. Language policy 10. Language development: - promotion and publication - codification - standardisation and education - foreign scholar involvement 11. Language vitality: positive, negative, and key factors 1 1. Classification, dialectal variation and differentiation, regional distribution, number of speakers Herero is a Bantu language (Niger Congo œ Benue-Kongo œ Bantoid œ Southern œ Narrow Bantu œ Central), classified according to Guthrie (1948) as R30.
    [Show full text]
  • Germanic Standardizations: Past to Present (Impact: Studies in Language and Society)
    <DOCINFO AUTHOR ""TITLE "Germanic Standardizations: Past to Present"SUBJECT "Impact 18"KEYWORDS ""SIZE HEIGHT "220"WIDTH "150"VOFFSET "4"> Germanic Standardizations Impact: Studies in language and society impact publishes monographs, collective volumes, and text books on topics in sociolinguistics. The scope of the series is broad, with special emphasis on areas such as language planning and language policies; language conflict and language death; language standards and language change; dialectology; diglossia; discourse studies; language and social identity (gender, ethnicity, class, ideology); and history and methods of sociolinguistics. General Editor Associate Editor Annick De Houwer Elizabeth Lanza University of Antwerp University of Oslo Advisory Board Ulrich Ammon William Labov Gerhard Mercator University University of Pennsylvania Jan Blommaert Joseph Lo Bianco Ghent University The Australian National University Paul Drew Peter Nelde University of York Catholic University Brussels Anna Escobar Dennis Preston University of Illinois at Urbana Michigan State University Guus Extra Jeanine Treffers-Daller Tilburg University University of the West of England Margarita Hidalgo Vic Webb San Diego State University University of Pretoria Richard A. Hudson University College London Volume 18 Germanic Standardizations: Past to Present Edited by Ana Deumert and Wim Vandenbussche Germanic Standardizations Past to Present Edited by Ana Deumert Monash University Wim Vandenbussche Vrije Universiteit Brussel/FWO-Vlaanderen John Benjamins Publishing Company Amsterdam/Philadelphia TM The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements 8 of American National Standard for Information Sciences – Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ansi z39.48-1984. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Germanic standardizations : past to present / edited by Ana Deumert, Wim Vandenbussche.
    [Show full text]
  • THE FUTURE of the BANTU LANGUAGES by W
    THE FUTURE OF THE BANTU LANGUAGES By W. B. LOCKWOOD T^HE Freedom Charter adopted by the Congress of the People at Kliptown, Johannesburg, contains the demand that "All people shall have equal right to use their own languages." Of latef this question of language has been very much to the fore in South Africa, where it has been discussed in the progressive press and elsewhere, and very different views have been expressed. Recently, D. T. Cole, a lecturer in Bantu languages at the Wit- watersrand University, wrote an article in Forum (Vol. 3, No. 2) dealing with the problem of the exceptional linguistic diversity in South Africa. His article is symptomatic of the confusion in the minds of many people, including well-wishers of the African, and it will not be out of place to consider his opinions. Cole envisages for the Bantu languages a policy of linguistic unifica­ tion which in the distant future might lead to the creation of two major Bantu languages. These two could then be "offered" official status which, says Cole, is out of the question for any Bantu language, at the moment. Cole is led to this view by his general conception of the Bantu languages: "It is not an economic proposition, from any point of view, to maintain our seven literary Bantu forms as separate languages, nor to offer them anything like the status of English or Afrikaans ... In addition . there are numerous lesser languages . whose small populations do not warrant (literary) development." For these patronis­ ing assumptions Cole does not, however, advance any evidence.
    [Show full text]
  • Self-Determination and Sub-Sovereign Statehood in the EU with Particular Reference to Scotland and Passing Reference to the Faroe Islands L
    Alasdair Geater and Scott Crosbyt Self-determination and Sub-sovereign Statehood in the EU with particular reference to Scotland and passing reference to the Faroe Islands l. Points of Departure II. Fear of Freedom III. Self-Determination as a Fundamental Human Right IV. Arguments of Dissuasion and their Rebuttal On the perceived dangers of nationafis m On the perceived risk of economic isolation On the fe ar of fragmentation IV. The Exercise of the Right of Self-determination under EU Law VI. The Importance of History VII. The Particular Case of Scotland Historical Constitutional Consequences of Scottish Statehood The Process The benefits of statehood ? 1 Partners respectively in Geater and Co and Stanbrook & Hooper, Brussels and faunding partners of Geater & Crosby, a joint venture devoted to Scots constitutional law, also based in Brussels. The seeds for this discourse were sown in a leeture in 1975 by Professor Neil MacCormick, then ayoung Dean of the Faculty of Law at Edinburgh University, which the younger of the co­ authors attended (and remembered). Føroyskt L6gar Rit (Faroese Law Review) vol. 1 no. 1 - 2001 "In a united Europe every small country can find its place alongside the former great powers" 2 Føroyskt Urtak Heiti: Sjalvsavgeroarrættur og at vera statur f ES viiJ partvisum fullveldi, vio serligum atliti til Skotlands, men eisini vio atliti til Føroya. Greinin vioger [ heimspekiligum og politiskum høpi tjdningin av, at tj6oir, sum nu eru i felagskapi viiJ aorar i ES, faa fullveldi og egnan ES-limaskap. Høvundarnir halda uppa, at tao er 6missandi rættur f fullum samsvari vio ES-Sattmalan hja hesum tj6oum at faa egnan ES-limaskap.
    [Show full text]
  • The Position of Frisian in the Germanic Language Area Charlotte
    The Position of Frisian in the Germanic Language Area Charlotte Gooskens and Wilbert Heeringa 1. Introduction Among the Germanic varieties the Frisian varieties in the Dutch province of Friesland have their own position. The Frisians are proud of their language and more than 350,000 inhabitants of the province of Friesland speak Frisian every day. Heeringa (2004) shows that among the dialects in the Dutch language area the Frisian varieties are most distant with respect to standard Dutch. This may justify the fact that Frisian is recognized as a second official language in the Netherlands. In addition to Frisian, in some towns and on some islands a mixed variety is used which is an intermediate form between Frisian and Dutch. The variety spoken in the Frisian towns is known as Town Frisian1. The Frisian language has existed for more than 2000 years. Genetically the Frisian dialects are most closely related to the English language. However, historical events have caused the English and the Frisian language to diverge, while Dutch and Frisian have converged. The linguistic distance to the other Germanic languages has also altered in the course of history due to different degrees of linguistic contact. As a result traditional genetic trees do not give an up-to-date representation of the distance between the modern Germanic languages. In the present investigation we measured linguistic distances between Frisian and the other Germanic languages in order to get an impression of the effect of genetic relationship and language contact for the position of the modern Frisian language on the Germanic language map.
    [Show full text]
  • What Can Faroese Pseudocoordination Tell Us About English Inflection?
    What can Faroese pseudocoordination tell us about English inflection? Daniel Ross University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 1 Introduction English, with its relatively impoverished morphology within Germanic, offers no evidence for determining whether a given verb form is inflected identically to the lexical root or not inflected at all. Furthermore, it is unclear whether all such identical forms are accidentally homophonous or are indications of systematic syncretism that is part of the mechanics of the morphosyntax of the language. This article addresses a particular morphosyntactic phenomenon for which this distinction has greater implications for the grammar. Does the grammar allow for specific requirements of uninflected verbal forms in certain constructions? Are uninflected present-tense forms of the verb systematically equivalent to the infinitive in a way that is operational in the grammar? Specifically, the ban on inflection found in English try and pseudocoordination is investigated in detail. As shown in (1), the construction is permitted if and only if both verbs happen to be in their uninflected forms.1 (1) a. Try and win the race! [Then even if you do not succeed, you tried.] b. I will try and win the race [but I am tired and might not be able to win]. c. I try and win the race every time [even though I rarely succeed]. d. *He tries and win(s) the race every time [but he rarely succeeds]. e. He did try and win the race [but his injury made it impossible]. f. *He tried and win/won the race [but his injury made it impossible].
    [Show full text]
  • The Case System of the Vilamovicean Adjective – from Description to Explanation
    Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics, Vol. 42, 2013, 37-54 doi: 10.5774/42-0-139 The case system of the Vilamovicean adjective – from description to explanation Alexander Andrason University of Stellenbosch, Private Bag X1, 7602 Matieland, South Africa Email: [email protected] Abstract The present paper offers a detailed description and analysis of the adjectival declensional patterns in the Modern Vilamovicean language. Modern Vilamovicean possesses six declensional patterns, restricted to distinct environments, that, from a morphological perspective, form a continuum ranging from a strong declension (classes 1, 2 and 3) to a weak one (class 6), through intermediate mixed paradigms (classes 4 and 5). Nowadays, only the mixed and weak classes are productive and common. If compared with Classical Vilamovicean, the adjectival declension has suffered a process of syncretism and decay, evolving towards a two-case marking: nominative vs. accusative-dative in the masculine singular and nominative- accusative vs. dative elsewhere. Thus, the adjectival morphological case marking is more effective than in the nominal system (where no case distinction is usually made), but less successful than in the pronominal system (where a three-case distinction predominates). Within a typological-grammaticalisation framework, the inflectional organisation of Vilamovicean adjectives can be defined as an advanced case system. Keywords: Germanic linguistics, endangered languages, case system, adjective, language change 1. Introduction Vilamovicean is a Germanic language that is spoken in Wilamowice, a small town located in Western Galicia in Poland. Nowadays, the vernacular is understood by circa two hundred persons, although actively employed by no more than forty native speakers. All the users of the Vilamovicean idiom, who may be viewed as fully competent and proficient, were born before the Second World War.
    [Show full text]
  • [.35 **Natural Language Processing Class Here Computational Linguistics See Manual at 006.35 Vs
    006 006 006 DeweyiDecimaliClassification006 006 [.35 **Natural language processing Class here computational linguistics See Manual at 006.35 vs. 410.285 *Use notation 019 from Table 1 as modified at 004.019 400 DeweyiDecimaliClassification 400 400 DeweyiDecimali400Classification Language 400 [400 [400 *‡Language Class here interdisciplinary works on language and literature For literature, see 800; for rhetoric, see 808. For the language of a specific discipline or subject, see the discipline or subject, plus notation 014 from Table 1, e.g., language of science 501.4 (Option A: To give local emphasis or a shorter number to a specific language, class in 410, where full instructions appear (Option B: To give local emphasis or a shorter number to a specific language, place before 420 through use of a letter or other symbol. Full instructions appear under 420–490) 400 DeweyiDecimali400Classification Language 400 SUMMARY [401–409 Standard subdivisions and bilingualism [410 Linguistics [420 English and Old English (Anglo-Saxon) [430 German and related languages [440 French and related Romance languages [450 Italian, Dalmatian, Romanian, Rhaetian, Sardinian, Corsican [460 Spanish, Portuguese, Galician [470 Latin and related Italic languages [480 Classical Greek and related Hellenic languages [490 Other languages 401 DeweyiDecimali401Classification Language 401 [401 *‡Philosophy and theory See Manual at 401 vs. 121.68, 149.94, 410.1 401 DeweyiDecimali401Classification Language 401 [.3 *‡International languages Class here universal languages; general
    [Show full text]
  • The Distribution of Definiteness Markers and the Growth of Syntactic Structure from Old Norse to Modern Faroese
    The Distribution of Definiteness Markers and the Growth of Syntactic Structure from Old Norse to Modern Faroese. A thesis submitted to the University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Humanities 2014 Pauline Harries School of Arts, Languages and Cultures List of Contents 1. Introduction 10 1.1 Aims and scope of the thesis 10 1.2 Background to Faroese 11 1.3 Introduction to the Insular Scandinavian 12 1.3.1 Ancestry and development 12 1.3.2 Faroese as an Insular Scandinavian language 14 1.3.3 The Noun Phrase in Faroese 18 1.4 Introduction to LFG 20 2. Definiteness Marking in Old Norse 23 2.1 Introduction 23 2.2 Previous literature on Old Norse 24 2.2.1 Descriptive literature 24 2.2.2 Theoretical literature 28 2.2.3 Origins of hinn 32 2.3 Presentation of Data 33 2.3.1 Zero definite marking 33 2.3.2 The hinn paradigm 37 2.3.2.1 The bound definite marker 37 2.3.2.2 The free definite marker 39 2.3.2.3 The other hinn 43 2.3.3 Demonstratives 44 2.3.3.1 Relative Clauses 48 2.3.4 Adjectival marking of definiteness 49 2.3.4.1 Definite adjectives in Indo-European 50 2.3.4.2 Definite adjectives in Old Norse 53 2.3.4.3 The meaning of weak versus strong 56 2.3.5 Summary of Findings 57 2.4 Summary and discussion of Old Norse NP 58 2.4.1 Overview of previous literature 59 2.4.2 Feature Distribution and NP structure 60 2.5 Summary of Chapter 66 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Language Planning Newsletter, November 1981, Vol. 7, No
    language" except courses in foreign languages. A Kumision I Fino' Chamorro Chamorro Bicultural Bilingual Program in (Guam) elementary schools, however, aims at revitalizing the Chamorro language and 'old ways,' but is as yet in an Martin Combs and Bjdrn H. Jernudd* experimental stage only. Also, Guam has been the beneficiary of the U.S. Bilingual Education Act of 1968 The Micronesian islands are currently being through which support is given for teacher training reorganized into self-governing and semi-independent and materials development. There is, however, some states. One of these islands is Guam which for the time opposition from other ethnic groups to the use of being remains a self-governing territory of the United Chamorro in school. states. It is the southernmost island in the Mariana Very much like in other Micronesian indigenous Islands group, with a total population in 1980 of communities, there is dissatisfaction among the approximately 105,800 people: 48% are Chamorro, 20% Chamorro elders with language standards and degree of are of Philippine descent and 24% are Caucasian. Most usage of the indigenous language by younger of the latter are transient military personnel and their generations. The Chairman of the Governor's dependents. Also, there are Chinese, Korean, Japanese Commission on the Chamorro Language of the and other-Micronesian residents. Guam's northern Government of Guam - Kumision i Fino' Chamorro neighbor, the Commonwealth of the Northern - writes that "Chamorro is in poor condition with Mariana Islands, is predominantly Chamorro. There young people (18 years and less) usually possessing are also Chamorro communities in California and only receptive level skills (listening) in Chamorro." Hawaii.
    [Show full text]
  • Language, Gender and Sustainability LAGSUS
    Language, Gender & Sustainability – THEORETICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS-2 – p. I Language, Gender and Sustainability LAGSUS A PLURIDISCIPLINARY AND COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATION IN TRADITIONAL SOCIETIES Research project of the Volkswagen-Stiftung (Hannover) "Schlüsselthemen der Geisteswissenschaften/Key issues in the humanities“ A joint venture initiated by language- and development-oriented researchers at the universities of Francfurt a/M, Kassel and Zurich (Switzerland) , in close cooperation with their partners and counterparts in the host countries: Ivory Coast (Centre Suisse de Recherche Scientifique [CSRS]; Université de Cocody [Abidjan]); Namibia (Univ. of Namibia ; NNFU; TKFA); Indonesia (STORMA [= SFB 552: Stability of Rainforest Margins in Indonesia]; Tadulako Univ. at Palu [Central Sulawesi]), and with actors engaged in various roles in various local development projects. PROJECT DESCRIPTION (November 2002) Language, Gender & Sustainability – THEORETICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS-2 - II TABLE OF CONTENTS I. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT 1 GENERAL BACKGROUND AND "STATE-OF-THE-ART" 1.1 Linguistic fragmentation and developme nt 1.2 Language – missing link in development studies 1.3 Language and development theory 1.4 Language, development and gender 1.5 Development communication - meeting-point of linguistics and sociology 1.6 Why language? 1.7 Conclusion 2 PROJECT OVERVIEW 3 METHODOLOGY 3.1 Key hypotheses 3.2 Pillars of field methodology: discourse hermeneutics and participatory research 3.3 Field heuristics: the "Twelve questions" 3.4 Lexico-semantic analysis 3.5 Qualitative and quantitative methods 3.6 Comparability 3.7 Field procedures, interdisciplinary methodology and project organization 4 EXPECTED RESULTS 4.1 Nature of the results 4.2 Theoretical contribution: towards a theory of communicative sustainability 4.3 Benefits for planners and practitioners 4.4 A model for interdisciplinary research II Language, Gender & Sustainability – THEORETICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS-2 - III II.
    [Show full text]