WRAP | Understanding Plastic Packaging 1 Plastic Can Be Made from Fossil-Based This Diagram Demonstrates the Or Bio-Based Materials

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

WRAP | Understanding Plastic Packaging 1 Plastic Can Be Made from Fossil-Based This Diagram Demonstrates the Or Bio-Based Materials Understanding plastic packaging and the language we use to describe it The way a plastic is designed This document sets out to clarify the differences Contents to behave alongside what between the materials used Material type 3 to make plastic packaging, Behaviour and features 4 material it’s made from, the way plastics can behave affects what it can be used and, the terminology used Suitability for recycling 5 for as well as how it can be to describe plastics. Treatment and disposal route 6 Environmental impact 7 recycled and disposed of at Carbon footprint over life cycle 8 the end of its life. Glossary 9 References 10 With plastics top of the sustainability compostable – and the effect these agenda many companies are looking factors have on how it’s collected at alternatives to conventional and disposed of. plastic typically used for packaging applications. Understanding the terms that we use to describe plastics is essential However, there is potential for the to ensure that the right materials language that we use to describe are used in the right applications, plastics to be confusing: with the and so that all plastics are recycled different material types of plastic – in the right way and pollution of fossil-based or bio-based; how the environment is prevented. plastic is described and referred to – conventional plastics or bioplastics; This document is aimed at anyone and, how plastic behaves – non- who is interested in understanding biodegradable, biodegradable or the complexities around different types of plastic. WRAP | Understanding plastic packaging 1 Plastic can be made from fossil-based This diagram demonstrates the or bio-based materials. Both can be complexity of the term bioplastics; used to make highly durable, non- which refers to a diverse family of biodegradable plastics, or plastics materials with differing properties – Bio-based which either biodegrade or compost. there are three main groups: The nature of the material used 1 Bio-based or partially bio-based to make a plastic or the term used non-biodegradable plastics such to describe it does not necessarily as bio-based PE or PP 1 2 dictate the way it will behave at the end of its life e.g. a bio-based plastic 2 Plastics that are both bio-based Bioplastics Bioplastics or bioplastic does not automatically and biodegradable, such as eg. PE, PET, eg. PLA, PHA, PBS, mean it will biodegrade. biodegradable PLA and PHA PA, PTT Starch blends or PBS Biodegradable 3 Plastics that are fossil-based and biodegradable, such as PBAT See glossary for acronyms. 3 Non biodegradable Conventional Bioplastics plastics eg. PBAT, PCL eg. PE, PP, PET Fossil based WRAP | Understanding plastic packaging 2 Material type Fossil-based plastic Bio-based plastic Made from a wide range of polymers Made using polymers derived from derived from petrochemicals. Fossil- plant based sources e.g. starch, based plastic packaging is generally cellulose, oils, lignin etc. long lived, durable and non- biodegradable; this is what’s referred Bio-based plastic is the term used to as conventional plastics. However, for any plastic made from bio-based fossil-based plastic can also be polymers, and refers to the source designed to biodegrade and this from which the plastic is made, not type is considered a bioplastic. how the material will function. IMAGE? Bio-based polymers can be used to make plastic packaging that behaves like conventional plastic and is long lived, durable and non-biodegradable. It can also be used to make biodegradable and compostable plastics. Both types are referred to as bioplastics (see diagram on page 2). WRAP | Understanding plastic packaging 3 Behaviour and features All plastics, regardless of whether they are fossil-based Non-biodegradable Biodegradable Compostable or bio-based, can be designed Is durable and lasts for years. Breaks down in a defined period Can meet EN13432 or a comparable to behave in three ways: of time. standard for compostable packaging It has high strength and can be used so that the material decomposes/ in low weight applications. It can now be made with similar biodegrades in industrial composting strength, plasticity and elasticity conditions. Materials that meet properties of non-biodegradable an appropriate home composting plastics, and made into products standard can be composted in using the same technologies home composting systems. (e.g. film processing or moulding). It can have similar strength, plasticity The fact that a plastic is described as and elasticity properties to non- biodegradable does not mean that biodegradable plastics and can be it should be freely released into made into products using the same the environment in an uncontrolled technologies (e.g. film processing manner. The speed, method and or moulding). nature of biodegradation differs between materials and users should question the behaviour of biodegradable materials before using them in any application. Importantly, not all biodegradable plastic is compostable, but all compostable plastic is biodegradable. WRAP | Understanding plastic packaging 4 Suitability for recycling The way a plastic is designed to behave dictates Non-biodegradable Biodegradable Compostable its suitability for recycling – Non-biodegradable packaging Currently biodegradable plastics Compostable plastics can be not whether it is fossil-based plastics can be recycled, if collected cannot be recycled in the same way composted at industrial scale or bio-based. and sorted into separate material as non-biodegradable plastic. composting facilities or, in some reprocessing streams. cases, may be suitable for home It must be separated from non- composting. It is vital that only The route for recycling or disposal biodegradable plastic streams and compostable plastics are sent to must not compromise other recycling dealt with separately. If not, it causes these routes as non-compostable routes. Non-biodegradable plastics problems during the recycling plastics can contaminate the final entering the composting processes process. compost produced. can contaminate the final product. Biodegradable packaging needs to be Compostable plastic packaging clearly labelled and easy for citizens needs to be clearly labelled and easy to identify, separate and correctly for citizens to identify, separate and dispose of. The route for treatment correctly dispose of in an appropriate and disposal must not compromise collection and recycling scheme for other existing recycling routes. compostable plastics. The route Biodegradable packaging can only for recycling compostable packaging be composted when it meets the must not compromise non- appropriate composting standard. biodegradable recycling routes. WRAP | Understanding plastic packaging 5 UK treatment and disposal routes Non-biodegradable Biodegradable Compostable Recycling Energy from waste Landfill ++ AD * * * Composting ** * Any non-biodegradable, biodegradable or compostable packaging sent to wet AD systems that do not include a composting step for the treatment of digestate in the UK will be removed during pre-treatment of the feedstock material and sent to landfill or energy from waste. ** Plastic packaging can only go to industrial composting if it complies with the EN13432 compostable standard or a recognised home composting specification. It can only be composted at home if it complies with a recognised home composting specification. ++ Compostable packaging can be accepted at dry AD systems that can process the material fully or at wet AD sites where the process includes a composting step for the treatment of the separated digestate fibre. WRAP | Understanding plastic packaging 6 Environmental impact Any plastic that evades appropriate collection and treatment that escapes into the environment has the potential to have a long-lasting impact on the environment. Non-biodegradable plastic Biodegradable and packaging compostable plastic packaging Conventional plastic debris has been shown to accumulate in inland waters There is a lack of clarity concerning and marine environments. The impact standards that define the of this is now being widely discussed. biodegradability of biodegradable or compostable plastics in any There is very limited information environment. There is a particular on the impact of conventional plastic lack of evidence on the behaviour of in soil-based environments, though these materials in water, and there is it is clear that plastic fragments will a need to understand biodegradation persist for long periods of time. at lower temperatures. Therefore, it is very difficult to accurately assess environmental impact of biodegradable and compostable plastic packaging. WRAP | Understanding plastic packaging 7 Carbon footprint over life cycle Life Cycle Assessment is a complex technique to quantify the environmental impact of a single product over its whole life cycle. For greenhouse gas emissions from The opposite is true for biodegradable all types of plastic, studies show that plastics, which has the potential to raw material extraction, production, give rise to methane under landfill and waste disposal contribute most to conditions, but in energy recovery emissions. Bio-based plastics usually are considered carbon neutral have a lower carbon impact in their (short cycle emissions). extraction and production phase. Compostable plastics contribute Where conventional plastics enter to compost structure, but contain energy from waste facilities, they no nutrients (NPK). emit greenhouse gases, which can be higher than combusting coal or
Recommended publications
  • Extrusion Foaming of Bioplastics for Lightweight Structure in Food Packaging
    EXTRUSION FOAMING OF BIOPLASTICS FOR LIGHTWEIGHT STRUCTURE IN FOOD PACKAGING A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Sitthi Duangphet School of Engineering and Design Brunel University December 2012 i Abstract This thesis reports the systematic approaches to overcome the key drawbacks of the pure PHBV, namely low crystallisation rate, tensile strength, ductility, melt viscosity, thermal stability and high materials cost. The physical, mechanical, thermal, and rheological properties of the pure PHBV were studied systematically first to lay a solid foundation for formulation development. The influence of blending with other biopolymers, inclusion of filler, and chain extender additives in terms of mechanical properties, rheology, thermal decomposition and crystallization kinetics were then followed. Creating lightweight structures by foaming is considered to be one of the effective ways to reduce material consumption, hence the reduction of density and morphology of PHBV-based foams using extrusion foaming technique were studied comprehensively in terms of extrusion conditions (temperature profiles, screw speed and material feeding rate) and the blowing agent content. The material cost reduction was achieved by adding low-cost filler (e.g. CaCO3) and reduction of density by foaming. The thermal instability was enhanced by incorporation of chain extender (e.g. Joncryl) and blending with a high thermal stability biopolymer (e.g. PBAT). The polymer blend also improved the ductility. Adding nucleation agent enhanced the crystallization rate to reduce stickiness of extruded sheet. The final formulation (PHBV/PBAT/CaCO3 composite) was successfully extruded into high quality sheet and thermoformed to produce prototype trays in an industrial scale trial. The effect of the extrusion conditions (temperature profiles, screw speed and material feeding rate) and the blowing agent content are correlated to the density reduction of the foams.
    [Show full text]
  • Impacts of a Ban Or Restrictions in Sale of Items in the EU's Single Use Plastics Directive
    SOCIAL RESEARCH NUMBER: 32/2020 PUBLICATION DATE: 19/05/2020 Preliminary Research to Assess the Impacts of a Ban or Restrictions in Sale in Wales of Items in the EU's Single Use Plastics Directive Mae’r ddogfen yma hefyd ar gael yn Gymraeg. This document is also available in Welsh. © Crown Copyright Digital ISBN 978-1-80038-424-8 Title: Preliminary Research to Assess the Impacts of a Ban or Restrictions in Sale in Wales of Items in the EU's Single Use Plastics Directive Author(s): George Cole, Resource Futures Carla Worth, Resource Futures Katie Powell, Resource Futures Sam Reeve, Resource Futures Susie Stevenson, Miller Research (UK) Nick Morgan, Miller Research (UK) Howard Walker, Bridge Economics Full Research Report: Cole, G; Worth, C; Powell, K; Reeve, S; Stevenson, S; Morgan, N; Walker, H (2019). Preliminary Research to Assess the Impacts of a Ban or Restrictions in Sale in Wales of Items in the EU's Single Use Plastics Directive. Cardiff: Welsh Government, GSR report number 32/2020 Available at: https://gov.wales/impacts-ban-or-restrictions-sale-items-eus-single- use-plastics-directive Views expressed in this report are those of the researcher and not necessarily those of the Welsh Government For further information please contact: Isabella Malet-Lambert Knowledge and Analytical Services Welsh Government Cathays Park Cardiff CF10 3NQ 03000 628250 [email protected] Table of contents List of tables ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1610 8 Shashoua Icomcc 2017
    ICOM-CC 18th Triennial Conference Sustainable future alternatives 2017 Copenhagen to petroleum-based polymeric SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH conservation materials YVONNE SHASHOUA* INTRODUCTION National Museum of Denmark Kongens Lyngby, Denmark [email protected] Conservation treatments often employ petroleum-based plastic materials KATJA JANKOVA ATANASOVA as packaging, adhesives and coatings that are synthesised from non- Technical University of Denmark Kongens Lyngby, Denmark renewable crude oil, a resource at risk of exhaustion within the next [email protected] 100 years. The Going Green conference held at the British Museum in CLAIRE CURRAN ICA Art Conservation April 2009 concluded that conservators are under increasing pressure to Cleveland OH, USA [email protected] review their practices in light of international environmental targets and *Author for correspondence the rising costs of fossil fuels. Biopolymers are considered sustainable either because they are synthesised from renewable sources or because they biodegrade to CO2 and H2O in soil and water after use. The range and KEYWORDS: sustainable, biopolymer, bioplastic quality of bioplastics have increased dramatically since 2006 and, today, polyethylene, polyester, soya, humic acid polyethylenes, polyesters, polyurethanes and polyvinyl alcohols can be fully synthesised from biomass, although their commercial availability ABSTRACT is more limited in Europe than in the USA and South America. While The research described here is the first study extensive research has been conducted into the rates and mechanism of on the use of sustainable, plant-based biopoly- degradation of bioplastics on disposal (Rani et al. 2012), few projects have mers in conservation practice. Two applications of biopolymers to conservation were investi- focused on their chemical and physical properties during use and none gated – in commercial bioplastics as substi- have addressed the application of bioplastics to conservation practice.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodegradable Packaging Materials from Animal Processing Co-Products and Wastes: an Overview
    polymers Review Biodegradable Packaging Materials from Animal Processing Co-Products and Wastes: An Overview Diako Khodaei, Carlos Álvarez and Anne Maria Mullen * Department of Food Quality and Sensory Science, Teagasc Food Research Centre, Ashtown, Dublin, Ireland; [email protected] (D.K.); [email protected] (C.Á.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +353-(1)-8059521 Abstract: Biodegradable polymers are non-toxic, environmentally friendly biopolymers with con- siderable mechanical and barrier properties that can be degraded in industrial or home composting conditions. These biopolymers can be generated from sustainable natural sources or from the agri- cultural and animal processing co-products and wastes. Animals processing co-products are low value, underutilized, non-meat components that are generally generated from meat processing or slaughterhouse such as hide, blood, some offal etc. These are often converted into low-value products such as animal feed or in some cases disposed of as waste. Collagen, gelatin, keratin, myofibrillar proteins, and chitosan are the major value-added biopolymers obtained from the processing of animal’s products. While these have many applications in food and pharmaceutical industries, a sig- nificant amount is underutilized and therefore hold potential for use in the generation of bioplastics. This review summarizes the research progress on the utilization of meat processing co-products to fabricate biodegradable polymers with the main focus on food industry applications. In addition, the factors affecting the application of biodegradable polymers in the packaging sector, their current industrial status, and regulations are also discussed. Citation: Khodaei, D.; Álvarez, C.; Mullen, A.M. Biodegradable Keywords: biodegradable polymers; packaging materials; meat co-products; animal by-products; Packaging Materials from Animal protein films Processing Co-Products and Wastes: An Overview.
    [Show full text]
  • Bio-Based and Biodegradable Plastics – Facts and Figures Focus on Food Packaging in the Netherlands
    Bio-based and biodegradable plastics – Facts and Figures Focus on food packaging in the Netherlands Martien van den Oever, Karin Molenveld, Maarten van der Zee, Harriëtte Bos Rapport nr. 1722 Bio-based and biodegradable plastics - Facts and Figures Focus on food packaging in the Netherlands Martien van den Oever, Karin Molenveld, Maarten van der Zee, Harriëtte Bos Report 1722 Colophon Title Bio-based and biodegradable plastics - Facts and Figures Author(s) Martien van den Oever, Karin Molenveld, Maarten van der Zee, Harriëtte Bos Number Wageningen Food & Biobased Research number 1722 ISBN-number 978-94-6343-121-7 DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.18174/408350 Date of publication April 2017 Version Concept Confidentiality No/yes+date of expiration OPD code OPD code Approved by Christiaan Bolck Review Intern Name reviewer Christaan Bolck Sponsor RVO.nl + Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs Client RVO.nl + Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs Wageningen Food & Biobased Research P.O. Box 17 NL-6700 AA Wageningen Tel: +31 (0)317 480 084 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: www.wur.nl/foodandbiobased-research © Wageningen Food & Biobased Research, institute within the legal entity Stichting Wageningen Research All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system of any nature, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. The publisher does not accept any liability for inaccuracies in this report. 2 © Wageningen Food & Biobased Research, institute within the legal entity Stichting Wageningen Research Preface For over 25 years Wageningen Food & Biobased Research (WFBR) is involved in research and development of bio-based materials and products.
    [Show full text]
  • Fork It Over! Create Biodegradable Plastic
    Fork it over! Create Biodegradable Plastic Bioenergy Education Initiative Levels: Description: Grades 6-12 In this lesson students learn how to create bioplastic (plastic derived from renewable sources). Using the engineering design process they will create, Content Areas: test, evaluate and improve a bioplastic utensil made from an animal, alga Chemistry; Engineering; Physical Science or plant source. The background material provides an opportunity to teach students about the difference between degradable, biodegradable and Lesson Time: compostable plastic and their environmental impact. Making Utensil: 45 -60 minutes (Curing Bioplastic: 3-5 days) Using This Lesson: Testing & Evaluating Utensil: 45 minutes The experiment in this lesson is done in small groups. It is broken down Improving Design: 45-60 minutes into three parts done over two weeks, depending on the drying time, which can take up to a week. In the second half of the lesson, students Next Generation Science evaluate the different utensils’ material characteristics. They can then Standards: redo the experiment to optimize their design. An advanced student option PSA1.A; ETS1.B is also available. MS-PS1-2; MS-ETS1-4 The background information is written at a ninth grade level and can be HS-PS1-5; HS-ETS1-3 used as reading material for students. Vocabulary words are highlighted Objectives & Outcomes: in the text and defined. Additionally, leading questions are included to promote discussion and critical thinking. • Students will develop biodegradable types of plastic and optimize Why Bioplastic? materials to develop a viable There are many types of plastic used in our everyday product. life. The source, type and chemical composition of • Students will engage in the plastic determines the size of its carbon footprint engineering design and testing (total amount of greenhouse gasses produced in its process.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Issue In
    PPW_1_fcV3_Layout 1 02/05/2014 10:50 Page 1 PACKPRINT WORLD PACKPRINTWORLD.COM SPRING 2014 A HIDDEN GEM IN THE QUALITY PRINT MARKET S P R Gravure is an established technique with a quality image I N G 2 second to none - so why has it fallen out of favor? 0 1 4 + THE EVOLUTION OF PACKAGING MATERIALS DEVELOPMENTS IN INKS AND COATINGS MANAGING A DIGITAL PRINTING OPERATION SOLUTIONS FOR HIGH-QUALITY SHORT TO MEDIUM RUN PRINTED PACKAGING Game changer Combining high-quality color with the efficiency of digital printing, HP Indigo will take your business to the next level. Engineered for mid-web packaging applications such as flexible packaging and label printing, the HP Indigo 20000 Digital Press is a superior alternative to analog technology. It brings the same quality as gravure to your operation so you can meet all your client demands for medium and short runs, whilst minimizing your operational costs. Grow your business with the HP Indigo 20000 Find out more at hp.com/go/hpindigo20000 © 2014 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. 4 | Contents CONTENTS Editorial [email protected] Andy Thomas Group Managing Editor David Pittman Group News Editor Nick Coombes Consultant Editor Mike Fairley International Publishing Director Danielle Jerschefske North America Editor James Quirk Latin America Editor Kevin Liu China Editor Carol Houghton Editorial Assistant Advertising [email protected] 10 Tim Gordon Publishing Director Joerg Singer Advertising Manager – PPW Randy Kessler Advertising Manager – North America Richard Quirk Account
    [Show full text]
  • Bio-Based Food Packaging in Sustainable Development
    Bio-based food packaging in Sustainable Development Challenges and opportunities to utilize biomass residues from agriculture and forestry as a feedstock for bio-based food packaging Author: Rubie van Crevel, intern Supervisor: Valeria Khristolyubova, Officer Forest Products Team Forestry Policy and Resources Division February 2016-June 2016 Table of contents Executive summary ......................................................................................................................... 4 1. Bio-based food packaging as a function of sustainable development ....................................... 7 2. Food packaging materials and environmental concerns .......................................................... 10 2.1 Methodology to assess environmental performances of a packaging material ................ 10 Life cycle thinking .................................................................................................................. 10 Life Cycle Assessment ........................................................................................................... 10 Limitations of Life Cycle Assessments .................................................................................. 12 2.2 Bio-based feedstock ............................................................................................................ 13 Defining bio-based products ................................................................................................. 13 Primary versus secondary biomass resources .....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of the Production of Bioplastics from Industrial Wastewater from Fish Canning Industry
    POLITECNICO DI TORINO Corso di Laurea Magistrale in Ingegneria per l’Ambiente e il Territorio Assessment of the production of bioplastics from industrial wastewater from fish canning industry Relatore Candidato Prof.ssa Silvia Fiore Giulia Zarroli Correlatore Prof.ssa Almudena Hospido Marzo 2020 CONTENTS ABSTRACT 7 1 ANALYSIS OF THE CONTEXT 8 PLASTICS: PRODUCTION, DEMAND AND WASTE DATA 8 GLOBAL AND EUROPEAN PLASTIC PRODUCTION 8 PLASTIC PACKAGING AND WASTE GENERATION 10 PLASTIC WASTE: DATA AND POLLUTION EFFECTS 11 STRATEGIES FOR A CIRCULAR AND BIOECONOMY 14 BIOECONOMY 14 CIRCULAR ECONOMY 16 BIOPLASTICS: STATE OF ART 17 BIOPLASTICS PRODUCTION ACCORDING TO THE MAIN APPLICATIONS AND TYPE OF BIOPOLYMER 19 BIOPLASTICS FROM DIFFERENT FEEDSTOCKS 20 BIOPLASTICS END OF LIFE OPTION 20 POLYHYDROXYALKANOATES (PHAS) 21 LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT 24 LCA METHODOLOGY 24 LCA APPLIED TO BIOPOLYMERS 27 GOAL AND STRUCTURE OF THIS THESIS 28 2 REVIEW OF LCA STUDIES ON PHA PRODUCTION 30 SEARCH METHODOLOGY 30 LITERATURE REVIEW 30 MOTIVATION OF THE STUDIES 33 KEY LCA-RELATED DECISIONS OF THE SELECTED STUDIES 35 LESSONS LEARNT FROM THE RESULTS ALREADY PUBLISHED 44 2.4 OPEN OR UNRESOLVED QUESTIONS 49 3 GOAL AND SCOPE DEFINITION OF THE LCA STUDIES 53 GOAL DEFINITION 53 SCOPE DEFINITION 53 TYPE OF LCA 53 FUNCTIONAL UNIT 54 SYSTEM BOUNDARIES 54 DATA COLLECTION 55 CHOICE OF IMPACT CATEGORIES AND METHOD OF IMPACT ASSESSMENT 57 ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITATIONS 58 2 4 LCA OF PURE CULTURE FERMENTATION 60 FERMENTATION PROCESS DESCRIPTION 60 LIFE CYCLE INVENTORY 61 LIFE CYCLE IMPACT ASSESSMENT 63 5 LCA OF MIXED CULTURE FERMENTATION 66 PROCESS DESCRIPTION 66 LIFE CYCLE INVENTORY 67 LIFE CYCLE IMPACT ASSESSMENT 68 6 COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE FULL PHA PRODUCTION PROCESSES 70 6.1 RESULTS OF THE FULL PHA PRODUCTION PROCESSES: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS 70 6.2 COMPARISON WITH THE BASELINE SCENARIO 73 7 CONCLUSIONS 76 REFERENCES 78 3 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Plastic production from 1950 to 2018 in the world and in EU28+NO/CH.
    [Show full text]
  • Greenhouse Gas Impacts of Disposable Vs Reusable Foodservice Products JANUARY 2017
    LITERATURE REVIEW & INVENTORY Greenhouse Gas Impacts of Disposable vs Reusable Foodservice Products JANUARY 2017 T STOP WASTE BEFORE IT STARTS Acknowledgements This study was written by Bill Sheehan, Ph.D. with supervision, review and input provided by Clean Water Fund staff, Miriam Gordon and Samantha Sommer. This project has been funded in part by the United States Environmental Protection Agency under assistance agreement X99T38501 to Clean Water Fund. The contents do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Environmental Protection Agency, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. Clean Water Fund thanks the Roy A. Hunt Foundation for supporting this work. T STOP WASTE BEFORE IT STARTS ReThink Disposable, created and implemented by Clean Water Fund (CWF), works in partnership with municipal stormwater and zero waste programs to engage food businesses and institutions (academic and corporate campuses) and consumers to minimize disposable take-out food and beverage packaging at the source to reduce plastics and trash that pollute our waterways and the ocean. This award winning program takes a pollution prevention approach to the ever-increasing problems of solid waste and marine debris. Based on research CWF conducted with five San Francisco Bay Area local jurisdiction partners in 2011, ReThink Disposable learned that food and beverage packaging is the primary component of trash (67%) entering the San Francisco Bay and polluting local creeks. Since 2012, ReThink Disposable has worked with more than 100 food businesses and five corporate and university campuses to reduce over 150,000 pounds of waste and the use of over 15 million disposable packaging items from food service operations, each year.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Optimization of the Environmental Performance of PHA Downstream Processing
    Preliminary optimization of the environmental performance of PHA downstream processing Mateo Saavedra del Oso, Miguel Mauricio-Iglesias and Almudena Hospido Group of Environmental Biotechnnology Universidade de Santiago de Compostela USABLE PACKAGING Call: H2020-BBI-JTI-2018 EU ID: 836884 Building blocks for a sustainable bioplastic value chain 100 Mt of food waste/year Biobased packaging products Building blocks 2 … but how? Framework: knowledge integration for efficient decision making BIOPLASTIC VALUE CHAIN MATHEMATICAL MODELLING Feedstock production PHA accumulation Process optimization PHA production VFA production PHA downstream INTEGRATION INTO LCA processing LCIA & Bioplastic shaping and Early scale-up compounding interpretation Data LCI Bioplastic use Best practices collection construction Bioplastic end-of-life Data collection LCI Long-term templates methodologies environmental impacts 3 LITERATURE REVIEW Bioplastic value chain hotspot: PHA downstream processing Feedstock production PHA production PHA downstream processing Bioplastic shaping and compounding Optimization of the environmental performance Bioplastic use Bioplastic end-of-life 4 Product requirements and processes selection Quality Chemical impurities High molecular weight Comply EU No 10/2011? High-grade (H) Low-grade (L) G Feedstock Culture Method TRL G Feedstock Culture Method TRL Acetone Acetone H1 Glucose Pure 9 L1 Methane Pure 4 extraction extraction HPH + SDS Osmotic H2 Food waste Pure 9 Canning Halophilic digestion L2 shock + SDS 4 wastewater bacteria NaOH
    [Show full text]
  • Buying Into Bioplastics: Starch Based Bioplastic for Food Packaging
    BUYING INTO BIOPLASTICS: STARCH BASED BIOPLASTIC FOR FOOD PACKAGING Maya Román, Reagan Dowling, John Christiano PLASTICS IN FOOD STARCH BASED PLASTICS Petroleum-Based Plastic Starch-Based Bioplastic ● The first plastic used in FCMs was Cellophane ● Bioplastic: plastic derived from natural Base Natural gas or crude oil: Corn and other vegetables: based on celluloid, the first synthetic materials and degrades when exposed to Materials Non-Renewable Renewable polymer, in 1927. environmental conditions ● Bakelite was the first completely synthetic ● Starch bioplastic derived from starch-based Disposal Limited recycling Landfills, Composting, plastic, used in a wide range of applications. polymers found in vegetables like corn and Landfills/Oceans Potentially Recyclable ● Plastic disposables became mainstream by potatoes the 1960s, as Saran Wrap, Styrofoam, Ziploc ● Fully biodegradable - Have little to no Post Breaks down extremely slowly Compost, off gassing methane (a bags, and microwave dinner trays, among environmental impact Disposal and harmfully greenhouse gas) other applications. ● Strong, lightweight, malleable ● Plasticware is a cheaper, safer alternative for Water Immense amounts of water in Still uses large amounts of water ● Number of food companies using starch restaurants compared to reusable options. Use both fuel extraction and to grow the crops bioplastic growing exponentially. Ex: Ecoware ● Plastics make up the sixth largest industry, in processing into plastic the US, consisting of 989,000 employees, and PRODUCTION STEPS: with a shipment value of $432.3 billion in Cost Extremely cheap for food Still in development, much 2016. Extraction Production of Polymer processing packaging pricier than petroleum of starch polymers (with extruder) counterpart FOOD PACKAGING’S Food BPA and similar chemicals can Excessive water in or on the BEST CHOICE Safety leach out of containers into packaging will lead to food and drink breakdown Neither petroleum-based nor bioplastics are perfect solutions.
    [Show full text]