DOCSLIB.ORG

1999 State Highway Crash Rate Tables

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

■ TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION ■ 1999 STATE HIGHWAY CRASH RATE TABLES Published by Transportation Data Section Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit September 2000 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1999 OREGON STATE HIGHWAY CRASH RATE TABLES Oregon Department of Transportation Transportation Development Division Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit 555 13th Street NE, Suite 2 Salem, OR 97301-4178 Mark Wills Manager September 2000 The information contained in this publication is compiled from individual driver and police crash reports submitted to the Oregon Department of Transportation as required in ORS 811.720. The Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit is committed to providing the high- est quality crash data to customers. However because submittal of crash report forms is the responsibility of the individual driver, the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit can not guarantee that all qualifying crashes are represented nor can assurances be made that all details pertaining to a single crash are accurate. T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S Page Introduction................................................................................................... 4 PART ONE Results of Analysis3 Facts of Interest.................................................................................... 6 Table I - Comparison of Motor Vehicle Death Rates.............................. 7 Table II - 1995-1999 Traffic Crash Rates.............................................. 8 Table III - Comparison of 1998-1999 Crash Rate Data ........................ 9 Table IV - Comparative Crash Rates by Jurisdiction ............................ 10 Highway Numbers, Names and Routes ............................................... 11 Map - State Highway System ............................................................... Map - Portland System......................................................................... PART TWO Highway Crash Rate Data by Sections ........................................................ 14 Crash Rate Formula ............................................................................. 15 Crash Rates.......................................................................................... 16 PART THREE Fatal Traffic Crash Summaries.................................................................. 244 By Roadway System ......................................................................... 245 By Type of Collision........................................................................... 246 By Sites and Conditions .................................................................... 247 Appendix: Glossary of Terms and Abbreviations...................................... 248 iii I N T R O D U C T I O N The three parts of this report are: I Results of Analysis containing comparative tables and the Signed Route on Highway list, II Five-year crash rate data by highway sections, III Summaries of this year's fatal traffic crashes. The first two parts provide data that show crash frequencies in relation to traffic volume and lineal length. Any comparison of crash data, either by count or formula, must recognize the vehicle miles involved. Failure to evaluate the data in this manner could lead to errors. Part I compares the Oregon to the nationwide traffic death rate. Traveled mileage death rates and population death rates are shown, as well as comparative rates by design types. Freeway and non- freeway data are presented by urban, suburban and rural subgroups. Part II presents five-year crash experience for each highway. Each state highway is divided into urban and rural sections, which are further subdivided for analysis. The start milepost, length, num- ber of crashes, average daily traffic, current crash rate, as well as the crash rate for the previous four years is shown for each sub section. Each section and highway is summarized. Part III contains summaries of this year's fatal crashes in Oregon. Since 1941, the Department of Transportation has summarized the records of all Oregon motor vehi- cle traffic crashes. This crash data has been made available to the public as well as government agencies. Since 1948, the Department has published traffic crash data. Current crash coding is guided by the "Manual on Classification of Motor Vehicle Traffic Accidents, 1989", published by the National Safety Council. Since 1998, Oregon law has required that any traffic crash on a public roadway resulting in a fatality, bodily injury or damage to one person’s property in excess of $1000 be reported. The Driver and Motor Vehicles Services Division is the repository for these reports. 4 PART 1 RESULTS OF ANALYSIS 5 F A C T S O F I N T E R E S T The State Highway System accounted for 20,320,715,923 vehicle miles of travel during 1999. This was an increase of 3.07 percent from the 1998 total of 19,716,008,889. The State Highway System had 222 fatal crashes during 1999. This represented a decrease of 24 percent from the 292 fatal crashes reported in 1998. The total number of persons killed in 1999 was 258, a decrease of 23 percent from the 1998 total of 335. The 1999 crash rate per million vehicle miles for non-freeway highway was 1.67. This was 4.77 times more than the total freeway crash rate of 0.35 for the same period. This difference between non-freeway and freeway crash rates indicates the greater safety of travel on freeways. An estimated 41,345 traffic deaths for the nation is a 0.3 percent decrease from the 1998 final figure of 41,471. Oregon, with a total of 413 killed in 1999, shows a 23.2 percent decrease from the 538 fatalities in 1998. 6 COMPARISON OF MOTOR VEHICLE DEATH RATES 1969 - 1999 Table I portrays annual motor vehicle traffic death rates on mileage and population bases from 1969 to 1999. The figures shown are estimates based on data from state traffic authorities, the National Center for Health Statistics, and the Federal Highway Administration. TABLE I Traveled-Mileage Death Rates1 Population Death Rates2 YEAR Oregon United States Oregon United States 1999 1.2 1.5 12.5 15.1 1998 1.6 1.6 16.5 15.3 1997 1.6 1.6 16.3 15.7 1996 1.7 1.7 16.4 15.8 1995 1.9 1.7 18.2 15.8 1994 1.6 1.7 12.8 15.6 1993 1.7 1.7 17.2 15.5 1992 1.6 1.7 15.8 15.4 1991 1.9 1.9 16.5 16.9 1990 2.1 2.1 20.3 18.7 1989 2.4 2.2 23.0 18.9 1988 2.7 2.3 24.4 19.9 1987 2.6 2.4 22.9 20.1 1986 2.7 2.5 23.2 19.8 1985 2.6 2.5 21.0 19.1 1984 2.7 2.6 21.4 19.4 1983 2.7 2.6 20.8 19.0 1982 2.7 3.8 19.5 20.0 1981 3.3 3.2 24.2 22.1 1980 3.3 3.3 24.4 23.5 1979 3.4 3.3 26.5 23.5 1978 3.6 3.3 29.1 23.5 1977 3.7 3.3 28.1 22.7 1976 3.7 3.2 27.2 21.9 1975 3.6 3.4 24.9 21.4 1974 4.4 3.5 29.7 21.9 1973 4.0 4.1 28.5 26.5 1972 4.8 4.3 33.5 27.0 1971 4.8 4.5 31.7 26.7 1970 5.1 4.7 32.9 27.1 1969 5.6 5.0 34.2 27.9 1 Number of deaths per 100,000,000 vehicle miles. 2 Number of deaths per 100,000 population. 7 CRASHES ON STATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM Table II shows the comparative five-year crash experience for freeways and non-freeways on the State High- way System, primary and secondary components, the respective rural and urban portions. Total lengths for the categories are shown for the new year only. TABLE II CRASHES PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 Description Miles Rate Rate Rate Rate Rate TOTAL State Highway System 7,492.99 1.06 1.14 1.11 1.23 1.13 Freeways 759.15 0.35 0.43 0.40 0.58 0.31 Non-Freeways 6,733.84 1.67 1.74 1.70 1.76 1.82 Primary System 4,959.92 0.99 1.08 1.04 1.15 1.07 Freeways 743.09 0.33 0.41 0.39 0.55 0.30 Non-Freeways 4,216.83 1.70 1.77 1.72 1.76 1.86 Secondary System 2,533.07 1.46 1.52 1.47 1.66 1.51 Freeways 16.06 0.71 0.79 0.67 1.20 0.56 Non-Freeways 2,517.01 1.59 1.65 1.62 1.75 1.68 RURAL State Highway System 6,783.33 0.61 0.63 0.61 0.70 0.60 Freeways 632.10 0.19 0.25 0.23 0.32 0.14 Non-Freeways 6,151.23 0.94 0.93 0.91 0.98 0.94 Primary System 4,442.40 0.53 0.55 0.53 0.61 0.52 Freeways 630.31 0.19 0.25 0.23 0.31 0.14 Non-Freeways 3,812.09 0.88 0.85 0.83 0.89 0.89 Secondary System 2,340.93 1.08 1.14 1.11 1.26 1.08 Freeways 1.79 0.25 0.28 0.16 1.13 0.28 Non-Freeways 2,339.14 1.11 1.17 1.14 1.26 1.11 URBAN State Highway System 709.66 1.98 2.17 2.09 2.25 2.19 Freeways 127.05 0.62 0.73 0.70 1.01 0.59 Non-Freeways 582.61 3.40 3.66 3.52 3.53 3.84 Primary System 517.52 1.95 2.17 2.07 2.23 2.16 Freeways 112.78 0.60 0.71 0.69 0.99 0.58 Non-Freeways 404.74 3.50 3.83 3.67 3.63 3.98 Secondary System 192.14 2.18 2.22 2.14 2.39 2.31 Freeways 14.27 0.79 0.88 0.76 1.22 0.61 Non-Freeways 177.87 2.98 2.97 2.93 3.10 3.27 RURAL includes both the Rural and Suburban shown in Table IV.
Recommended publications
  • JORDAN This Publication Has Been Produced with the Financial Assistance of the European Union Under the ENI CBC Mediterranean

    JORDAN This Publication Has Been Produced with the Financial Assistance of the European Union Under the ENI CBC Mediterranean

    ATTRACTIONS, INVENTORY AND MAPPING FOR ADVENTURE TOURISM JORDAN This publication has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Union under the ENI CBC Mediterranean Sea Basin Programme. The contents of this document are the sole responsibility of the Official Chamber of Commerce, Industry, Services and Navigation of Barcelona and can under no circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position of the European Union or the Programme management structures. The European Union is made up of 28 Member States who have decided to gradually link together their know-how, resources and destinies. Together, during a period of enlargement of 50 years, they have built a zone of stability, democracy and sustainable development whilst maintaining cultural diversity, tolerance and individual freedoms. The European Union is committed to sharing its achievements and its values with countries and peoples beyond its borders. The 2014-2020 ENI CBC Mediterranean Sea Basin Programme is a multilateral Cross-Border Cooperation (CBC) initiative funded by the European Neighbourhood Instrument (ENI). The Programme objective is to foster fair, equitable and sustainable economic, social and territorial development, which may advance cross-border integration and valorise participating countries’ territories and values. The following 13 countries participate in the Programme: Cyprus, Egypt, France, Greece, Israel, Italy, Jordan, Lebanon, Malta, Palestine, Portugal, Spain, Tunisia. The Managing Authority (JMA) is the Autonomous Region of Sardinia (Italy). Official Programme languages are Arabic, English and French. For more information, please visit: www.enicbcmed.eu MEDUSA project has a budget of 3.3 million euros, being 2.9 million euros the European Union contribution (90%).
  • 2012 State Highway Crash Rate Tables

    2012 State Highway Crash Rate Tables

    TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION 2012 STATE HIGHWAY CRASH RATE TABLES Published by Transportation Data Section Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit November 2013 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 2012 OREGON STATE HIGHWAY CRASH RATE TABLES Oregon Department of Transportation Transportation Development Division Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit 555 13th Street NE, Suite 2 Salem, OR 97301-4178 Robin Ness Manager November 2013 The Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit collects data and publishes statistics for reported motor vehicle traffic crashes per ORS 802.050(2) and 802.220(6). The data supports various local, county, and state traffic safety programs; engineering and planning projects; legislative concepts; and law enforcement services. Legally reportable motor vehicle traffic crashes are those involving death, bodily injury, or damage to personal property in excess of $500 (for crashes that occurred prior to 9/01/1997) or $1,000 (for crashes that occurred between 9/01/1997 and 12/31/2003). As of January 1, 2004, drivers are required to file an Accident and Insurance Report Form with DMV within 72 hours when: if injury or death resulted from the accident; damage to the driver's vehicle is over $1,500; damage to any vehicle is over $1,500 and any vehicle is towed from the scene as a result of said damage; or damage to any one person’s property, other than a vehicle involved in the accident, is over $1,500. For more information on filing requirements, please contact DMV. The Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit is committed to providing the highest quality crash data to customers. However, because submittal of crash report forms is the responsibility of the individual driver, the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit cannot guarantee that all qualifying crashes are represented; nor can assurances be made that all details pertaining to a single crash are accurate.
  • Oklahoma Statutes Title 69. Roads, Bridges, and Ferries

    Oklahoma Statutes Title 69. Roads, Bridges, and Ferries

    OKLAHOMA STATUTES TITLE 69. ROADS, BRIDGES, AND FERRIES §69-101. Declaration of legislative intent.............................................................................................19 §69-113a. Successful bidders - Return of executed contract................................................................20 §69-201. Definitions of words and phrases..........................................................................................21 §69-202. Abandonment........................................................................................................................21 §69-203. Acquisition or taking..............................................................................................................21 §69-204. Arterial highway.....................................................................................................................21 §69-205. Authority................................................................................................................................21 §69-206. Auxiliary service highway.......................................................................................................21 §69-207. Board......................................................................................................................................21 §69-208. Bureau of Public Roads..........................................................................................................21 §69-209. Commission............................................................................................................................21
  • Al-Rajef 82 Mw Wind Power Project Environmental and Social Impact

    Al-Rajef 82 Mw Wind Power Project Environmental and Social Impact

    AL-RAJEF 82 MW WIND POWER PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (ESIA) 23 April 2016 REV - 3 Al-Rajef Wind Power Project – Final ESIA Document title Al-Rajef 82 MW Wind Power Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Status REV- 3 Date 23 April 2016 Client Green Watts Renewable Energy (GWRE) Co. L.L.C REVISION RECORD Rev. Created By Internal Review By Date Submission Reviewed Date No. Status By Rev 0 ECO Consult ECO Consult 13 July 2015 Draft GWRE 15 July 2015 Rev 1 ECO Consult ECO Consult 6 Oct 2015 Draft Rev 2 ECO Consult ECO Consult 9 Nov 2015 Final Rev 3 ECO Consult ECO Consult 23 Apr 2016 Final PAGE | II Al-Rajef Wind Power Project – Final ESIA CONTACTS ECO Consult Physical Address: ECO Consult Jude Centre, 4th floor, Building #1 Salem Hindawi Street Shmeisani Amman Jordan Mailing Address: ECO Consult PO Box 941400 Amman 11194 Jordan Tel: +962 6 569 9769 Fax: + 962 6 569 7264 Email: [email protected] Contact Persons: Ra’ed Daoud Managing Director - ECO Consult E: [email protected] Lana Zu’bi Project Manager – ECO Consult E: lana.zu'[email protected] Ibrahim Masri Project Coordinator – ECO Consult E: [email protected] PAGE | III Al-Rajef Wind Power Project – Final ESIA TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................................. iv List of Figures .................................................................................................................................................
  • Transportation Finance, Training, Strategic Management, and Economic Analysis

    Transportation Finance, Training, Strategic Management, and Economic Analysis

    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD No. 1498 Planning and Administration Transportation Finance, Training, Strategic Management, and Economic Analysis A peer-reviewed publication of the Transportation Research Board TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL NATIONAL ACADEMY PRESS WASHINGTON, D.C. 1995 Transportation Research Record 1498 Edward A. Beimborn, Richard K. Brail, Michael S. Bronzini, Katherine L. ISSN 0361-1981 Davis, Roger L. Dean, Marvin C. Gersten, Edwin W. Hauser, Frederick ISBN 0-309-06162-8 Hugo, Joyce H. Johnson, Elaine E. Joost, C. Jotin Khisty, Patricia L. Lees, Price: $27 .00 John M. McCullough, Charles T. Morison, Jr., Neville A. Parker, Calvin Roberts, John Ross, Kwnares C. Sinha, Louis B. Stephens, Jr., C. Michael Subscriber Category Walton, Eugene M. Wilson IA planning and administration Committee on Transportation and Economic Development Printed in the United States of America Chairman: David J. Forkenbrock, University of Iowa Michael Bell, Fredric S. Berger, Stewart E. Butler, Gary DeCramer, Randall W. Eberts, Norman S. J. Foster, James S. Gillespie, Terry L. Gotts, John F. Hornbeck, Andrew M. Isserman, Hal S. Maggied, Sharon B. Megdal, Deb L. Miller, Susan Jones Moses, Bahar B. Sponsorship of Transportation Research Record 1498 Norris. Robert D. Owens, Elizabeth A. Pinkston, Wayne B. Placide, Farideh Ramjerdi, Kenneth D. Simonson, Theresa M. Smith, GROUP I-TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS PLANNING AND Robert J. Zuelsdoif ADMINISTRATION Chairman: Thomas F. Humphrey, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Committee on Strategic Management Chairman: George T. Lathrop, Charlotte Department of Transportation Management and Administration Section Secretary: Sidney Davis, Southern College of Technology Chairwoman: Julie Hoover, Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc. Kenneth Asp, Linda Bohlinger, Mark Ford, John Glover, Mark P.
  • Good Roads Everywhere: a History of Road Building in Arizona

    Good Roads Everywhere: a History of Road Building in Arizona

    GOODGGOODGOOOODD ROADSRROADSROOAADDSS EVERYWHERE:EEVERYWHERE:EVVEERRYYWWHHEERREE:: A HistoryHistory ofof RoadRoad BuildingBuilding inin ArizonaArizona prepared for prepared for Arizona Department of Transportation Environmental Planning Group May 2003 Cover Photograph U.S. Highway 66 at Gold Road, circa 1930s Norman Wallace, Photographer (Courtesy of Arizona Department of Transportation) GOOD ROADS EVERYWHERE: A HISTORY OF ROAD BUILDING IN ARIZONA prepared for Arizona Department of Transportation Environmental Planning Section 205 South 17th Avenue Phoenix, Arizona 85007 Project Number STP-900-0(101) TRACS #999 SW 000 H3889 01D Contract Number 97-02 URS Job 23442405 prepared by Melissa Keane J. Simon Bruder contributions by Kenneth M. Euge Geological Consultants, Inc. 2333 West Northern Avenue, Suite 1A Phoenix, Arizona 85021 revisions by A.E. (Gene) Rogge URS Corporation 7720 N. 16th Street, Suite 100 Phoenix, Arizona 85020 URS Cultural Resource Report 2003-28(AZ) March 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables ...................................................................................................................................... iv List of Figures..................................................................................................................................... iv List of Pocket Maps............................................................................................................................ v Foreword (by Owen Lindauer and William S. Collins)....................................................................
  • Highway 1, Pacific

    Highway 1, Pacific

    TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION 2000 STATE HIGHWAY MOTOR CARRIER CRASH RATE TABLES Published by Transportation Data Section Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit In cooperation with the Motor Carrier Transportation Division January 2002 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 2000 OREGON MOTOR CARRIER CRASH RATE TABLES Oregon Department of Transportation Transportation Development Division Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit 555 13th Street NE, Suite 2 Salem, OR 97301-4178 Mark Wills Manager January 2002 The information contained in this publication is compiled from individual driver reports, police crash reports, and motor carrier reports submitted to the Oregon Department of Transportation as required in ORS 811.720 and OAR 740-100-0020. The Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit is committed to providing the highest quality crash data to customers. However, because submittal of crash report forms is the responsibility of the individual driver and motor carrier, the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit cannot guarantee that all qualifying crashes are represented, nor can assurances be made that all details pertaining to a single crash are accurate. T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S Introduction .................................................................................................................. 1 PART ONE - RESULTS OF ANALYSIS Table I – Summary of Motor Carrier Crash Rates on State Highways for 2000.... 5 Table II – Monthly Summary of Crashes-Injuries-Deaths from 1996 to 2000......... 6 Table III – Motor Carrier Crashes and Rates from 1998 to 2000 ............................ 7 Table IV – Motor Carrier Crashes by Highway Type – 1996 to 2000...................... 8 Table V – Motor Carrier Crash Rates on Major Highways from 1996 to 2000 ....... 9 Table VI – Truck At-Fault Summary Ranking by Cause A.
  • JORDAN This Publication Has Been Produced with the Financial Assistance of the European Union Under the ENI CBC Mediterranean

    JORDAN This Publication Has Been Produced with the Financial Assistance of the European Union Under the ENI CBC Mediterranean

    DESTINATION REVIEW FROM A SOCIO-ECONOMIC, POLITICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL PERSPECTIVE IN ADVENTURE TOURISM JORDAN This publication has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Union under the ENI CBC Mediterranean Sea Basin Programme. The contents of this document are the sole responsibility of the Official Chamber of Commerce, Industry, Services and Navigation of Barcelona and can under no circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position of the European Union or the Programme management structures. The European Union is made up of 28 Member States who have decided to gradually link together their know-how, resources and destinies. Together, during a period of enlargement of 50 years, they have built a zone of stability, democracy and sustainable development whilst maintaining cultural diversity, tolerance and individual freedoms. The European Union is committed to sharing its achievements and its values with countries and peoples beyond its borders. The 2014-2020 ENI CBC Mediterranean Sea Basin Programme is a multilateral Cross-Border Cooperation (CBC) initiative funded by the European Neighbourhood Instrument (ENI). The Programme objective is to foster fair, equitable and sustainable economic, social and territorial development, which may advance cross-border integration and valorise participating countries’ territories and values. The following 13 countries participate in the Programme: Cyprus, Egypt, France, Greece, Israel, Italy, Jordan, Lebanon, Malta, Palestine, Portugal, Spain, Tunisia. The Managing Authority (JMA) is the Autonomous Region of Sardinia (Italy). Official Programme languages are Arabic, English and French. For more information, please visit: www.enicbcmed.eu MEDUSA project has a budget of 3.3 million euros, being 2.9 million euros the European Union contribution (90%).
  • 1997 State Highway Accident Rate Tables

    1997 State Highway Accident Rate Tables

    n TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT BRANCH n 1997 STATE HIGHWAY ACCIDENT RATE TABLES Published by Transportation Data Section Accident Data Unit August 1998 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION T A B L E OF C O N T E N T S Part Page Introduction......................................................................................................................3 Results of Analysis...............................................................................................I 5 Facts of Interest...................................................................................................I 6 Table I - Comparison of Motor Vehicle Death Rates.............................................I 7 Table II - 1993-1997 Traffic Accident Rates..........................................................I 8 Table III - Comparison of 1996-1997 Accident Rate Data.....................................I 9 Table IV - Comparative Accident Rates by Jurisdiction.........................................I 10 Highway Numbers, Names and Routes.................................................................I 11 Map - State Highway System................................................................................I 15 Map - Portland System Enlargement...................................................................I 15 Accident Rate Data by Section.............................................................................II 17 Summary of Fatal Traffic Accidents, State of Oregon...........................................III 245 Appendix A: Glossary of Terms and Abbreviations..........................................................251
  • In PDF Format

    In PDF Format

    Attachment 1 Page 1 of 41 TEA-21 HIGH PRIORITY PROJECTS - FY 1999 ALLOCATIONS TEA-21 FY 1999 ALLOCATION DEMO ID SECT. 1602 STATE PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJ. NO. PROJECT STATE TOTALS AL002 957 Alabama Construct bridge over Tennessee River connecting Muscle Shoals and 1,500,000 Florence AL002 1498 Alabama Construct bridge over Tennessee River connecting Muscle Shoals and 150,000 Florence AL002 1837 Alabama Construct bridge over Tennessee River connecting Muscle Shoals and 150,000 Florence AL006 760 Alabama Construct new I-10 bridge over the Mobile River in Mobile, Alabama. 1,617,187 AL007 423 Alabama Construct the Montgomery Outer Loop from US-80 to I-85 via I-65 1,535,625 AL007 1506 Alabama Construct Montgomery outer loop from US 80 to I-85 via I-65 1,770,000 AL007 1835 Alabama Construct Montgomery Outer Loop from US 80 to I-85 via I-65 150,000 AL008 156 Alabama Construct Eastern Black Warrior River Bridge. 1,950,000 AL008 1500 Alabama Construction of Eastern Black Warrior River Bridge 1,162,500 AL009 777 Alabama Construct Anniston Eastern Bypass from I-20 to Fort McClellan in 6,021,000 Calhoun County AL009 1505 Alabama Construct Anniston Eastern Bypass from I-20 to Fort McClellan in 300,000 Calhoun County AL009 1832 Alabama Construct Anniston Eastern Bypass 150,000 AL011 102 Alabama Initiate construction on controlled access highway between the Eastern 450,000 edge of Madison County and Mississippi State line. AL015 189 Alabama Construct Crepe Myrtle Trail near Mobile, Alabama 180,000 AL016 206 Alabama Conduct engineering, acquire right-of-way and construct the 2,550,000 Birmingham Northern Beltline in Jefferson County.
  • Authorized Test Centers 01-16-2020

    Authorized Test Centers 01-16-2020

    Test Center Name Test Center Address Test Center City Test Center State/Province Test Center Country Test Center Test Center Phone Zip/Postal Afghanistan Institute of Banking and Finance House 68, Masjeed-e-Hiratee lane 1 Share Now KaBul Afghanistan 1003Code 0093784158465 American University of Afghanistan PO BOX NO 458 Central Post Office Main Darul-Aman Road Senatoriam PD#6 AUAF Main Campus C KaBul Afghanistan 25000 '+93796577784 Building Room #C4 Future Step Kart-e-char Next to the Shahzade Shaher Wedding Hall KaBul City Afghanistan '+93 20 250 1475 Internetwork-Path Company Koti Sangi Charahi DeBoore Opposite of Negin Plaza KaBul Afghanistan 25000 0700006655 KateB University Darul Aman Road, KateB University. KaBul Afghanistan 1150 0093-729001992 RANA Technologies House No. 221 adjacent to shaheed shrine Shahr-e-Naw Beside Aryana airline Buidling KaBul Afghanistan 1003 07934 477 37 Connect Academy Rruga Muhamet Gjollesha Tirana AlBania 1001 '+355685277778 Divitech Rr: Barrikadave Vila 222 Tirane AlBania 1005 '+35542370108 Horizon Sh.p.k Str. Ismail Qemali Building No. 27, 4th Floor, No. 19 Tirana AlBania 1019 '+35542274966 Infosoft Systems Sh.p.k Rr. Abdi Toptani, Torre Drin, Kati 1 Tirana AlBania 1001 '+35542251180 ext.166 Innovation of Ethernet in Real Academy St. Andon Zako Cajupi Build 1, Entry 13, Ap. 7 (Second Floor) Tirane AlBania 1001 0697573353,042403989 Protik ICT Resource Center Street "Papa Gjon Pali II" Nr.3, Second Floor Tirana AlBania 1001 '+355673001907 QENDRA E TEKNOLOGJISE TIRANE RRUGA E DURRESIT NR.53 TIRANA AlBania

  • Active MRE City April2021

    TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY REGULATORY SERVICES DIVISION METALS REGISTRATION PROGRAM Active MRE, April 2021 Certificate ID Location Name Street Address City State Zip County Region Primary Contact Primary Phone Primary Email Statutory Email Expiration Date OperationHours Location Status 101025 A‐1 SALVAGE, LLC 4008 PINE STREET ABILENE TX 79601 TAYLOR 5 CHAD DOZIER (325) 672‐5504 [email protected] SAME AS PRIMARY 02‐05‐2023 M‐F 7AM‐5PM, SAT 8AM‐2PM, SUN Closed Active 101241 JAY'Z RECYCLING 3902 PINE ST. ABILENE TX 79601‐1116 TAYLOR 5 JASON HUDSON 325 676‐5299 [email protected] SAME AS PRIMARY 08‐14‐2021 M‐F 9AM‐6PM, SAT‐SUN CLOSED Active 101110 PINE STREET SALVAGE CO. 3833 PINE STREET ABILENE TX 79601 TAYLOR 5 GREG DANKWORTH 325 677‐8831 [email protected] SAME AS PRIMARY 03‐10‐2023 M‐F 8AM‐5PM, SAT 8AM‐12PM, SUN Closed Active 101053 TEXAS METALS & RECYCLING CO. INC 2989 PINE ST ABILENE TX 79601 TAYLOR 5 JODIE BREWSTER 325‐672‐8585 JODIE@TEXAS‐METALS.COM WAYNE@TEXAS‐METALS.COM 05‐07‐2023 M‐F 8AM‐5PM, SAT 9AM‐3PM, SUN closed Active 101982 ALAMO METAL RECYCLING 219 E. FRONTAGE RD ALAMO TX 78516 HIDALGO 3 RITESHKUMAR PATEL (956) 783‐4709 [email protected] [email protected] 04‐12‐2022 M‐F 8AM‐5PM, SAT 9AM‐1PM Active 102193 ALVAREZ RECYCLING 1109 S ALAMO RD ALAMO TX 78516 HIDALGO 3 ALVAREZ BELEN 956 638‐8004 [email protected] [email protected] 11‐12‐2021 M‐F 9:30AM‐6:30PM, SAT 9:30AM‐3PM, SUN CLOSED Active 102095 H&A METAL RECYCLERS 229 EAST BUSINESS 83 ALAMO TX 78516 HIDALGO 3 JORGE CALVILLO 956 283‐1151 [email protected] SAME AS PRIMARY 12‐22‐2022 M‐F 8AM‐5PM, SAT 9AM‐1PM, SUN CLOSED Active 102298 OLD SHINE METALS LLC 1302 N.