1999 State Highway Crash Rate Tables

1999 State Highway Crash Rate Tables

■ TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION ■ 1999 STATE HIGHWAY CRASH RATE TABLES Published by Transportation Data Section Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit September 2000 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1999 OREGON STATE HIGHWAY CRASH RATE TABLES Oregon Department of Transportation Transportation Development Division Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit 555 13th Street NE, Suite 2 Salem, OR 97301-4178 Mark Wills Manager September 2000 The information contained in this publication is compiled from individual driver and police crash reports submitted to the Oregon Department of Transportation as required in ORS 811.720. The Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit is committed to providing the high- est quality crash data to customers. However because submittal of crash report forms is the responsibility of the individual driver, the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit can not guarantee that all qualifying crashes are represented nor can assurances be made that all details pertaining to a single crash are accurate. T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S Page Introduction................................................................................................... 4 PART ONE Results of Analysis3 Facts of Interest.................................................................................... 6 Table I - Comparison of Motor Vehicle Death Rates.............................. 7 Table II - 1995-1999 Traffic Crash Rates.............................................. 8 Table III - Comparison of 1998-1999 Crash Rate Data ........................ 9 Table IV - Comparative Crash Rates by Jurisdiction ............................ 10 Highway Numbers, Names and Routes ............................................... 11 Map - State Highway System ............................................................... Map - Portland System......................................................................... PART TWO Highway Crash Rate Data by Sections ........................................................ 14 Crash Rate Formula ............................................................................. 15 Crash Rates.......................................................................................... 16 PART THREE Fatal Traffic Crash Summaries.................................................................. 244 By Roadway System ......................................................................... 245 By Type of Collision........................................................................... 246 By Sites and Conditions .................................................................... 247 Appendix: Glossary of Terms and Abbreviations...................................... 248 iii I N T R O D U C T I O N The three parts of this report are: I Results of Analysis containing comparative tables and the Signed Route on Highway list, II Five-year crash rate data by highway sections, III Summaries of this year's fatal traffic crashes. The first two parts provide data that show crash frequencies in relation to traffic volume and lineal length. Any comparison of crash data, either by count or formula, must recognize the vehicle miles involved. Failure to evaluate the data in this manner could lead to errors. Part I compares the Oregon to the nationwide traffic death rate. Traveled mileage death rates and population death rates are shown, as well as comparative rates by design types. Freeway and non- freeway data are presented by urban, suburban and rural subgroups. Part II presents five-year crash experience for each highway. Each state highway is divided into urban and rural sections, which are further subdivided for analysis. The start milepost, length, num- ber of crashes, average daily traffic, current crash rate, as well as the crash rate for the previous four years is shown for each sub section. Each section and highway is summarized. Part III contains summaries of this year's fatal crashes in Oregon. Since 1941, the Department of Transportation has summarized the records of all Oregon motor vehi- cle traffic crashes. This crash data has been made available to the public as well as government agencies. Since 1948, the Department has published traffic crash data. Current crash coding is guided by the "Manual on Classification of Motor Vehicle Traffic Accidents, 1989", published by the National Safety Council. Since 1998, Oregon law has required that any traffic crash on a public roadway resulting in a fatality, bodily injury or damage to one person’s property in excess of $1000 be reported. The Driver and Motor Vehicles Services Division is the repository for these reports. 4 PART 1 RESULTS OF ANALYSIS 5 F A C T S O F I N T E R E S T The State Highway System accounted for 20,320,715,923 vehicle miles of travel during 1999. This was an increase of 3.07 percent from the 1998 total of 19,716,008,889. The State Highway System had 222 fatal crashes during 1999. This represented a decrease of 24 percent from the 292 fatal crashes reported in 1998. The total number of persons killed in 1999 was 258, a decrease of 23 percent from the 1998 total of 335. The 1999 crash rate per million vehicle miles for non-freeway highway was 1.67. This was 4.77 times more than the total freeway crash rate of 0.35 for the same period. This difference between non-freeway and freeway crash rates indicates the greater safety of travel on freeways. An estimated 41,345 traffic deaths for the nation is a 0.3 percent decrease from the 1998 final figure of 41,471. Oregon, with a total of 413 killed in 1999, shows a 23.2 percent decrease from the 538 fatalities in 1998. 6 COMPARISON OF MOTOR VEHICLE DEATH RATES 1969 - 1999 Table I portrays annual motor vehicle traffic death rates on mileage and population bases from 1969 to 1999. The figures shown are estimates based on data from state traffic authorities, the National Center for Health Statistics, and the Federal Highway Administration. TABLE I Traveled-Mileage Death Rates1 Population Death Rates2 YEAR Oregon United States Oregon United States 1999 1.2 1.5 12.5 15.1 1998 1.6 1.6 16.5 15.3 1997 1.6 1.6 16.3 15.7 1996 1.7 1.7 16.4 15.8 1995 1.9 1.7 18.2 15.8 1994 1.6 1.7 12.8 15.6 1993 1.7 1.7 17.2 15.5 1992 1.6 1.7 15.8 15.4 1991 1.9 1.9 16.5 16.9 1990 2.1 2.1 20.3 18.7 1989 2.4 2.2 23.0 18.9 1988 2.7 2.3 24.4 19.9 1987 2.6 2.4 22.9 20.1 1986 2.7 2.5 23.2 19.8 1985 2.6 2.5 21.0 19.1 1984 2.7 2.6 21.4 19.4 1983 2.7 2.6 20.8 19.0 1982 2.7 3.8 19.5 20.0 1981 3.3 3.2 24.2 22.1 1980 3.3 3.3 24.4 23.5 1979 3.4 3.3 26.5 23.5 1978 3.6 3.3 29.1 23.5 1977 3.7 3.3 28.1 22.7 1976 3.7 3.2 27.2 21.9 1975 3.6 3.4 24.9 21.4 1974 4.4 3.5 29.7 21.9 1973 4.0 4.1 28.5 26.5 1972 4.8 4.3 33.5 27.0 1971 4.8 4.5 31.7 26.7 1970 5.1 4.7 32.9 27.1 1969 5.6 5.0 34.2 27.9 1 Number of deaths per 100,000,000 vehicle miles. 2 Number of deaths per 100,000 population. 7 CRASHES ON STATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM Table II shows the comparative five-year crash experience for freeways and non-freeways on the State High- way System, primary and secondary components, the respective rural and urban portions. Total lengths for the categories are shown for the new year only. TABLE II CRASHES PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 Description Miles Rate Rate Rate Rate Rate TOTAL State Highway System 7,492.99 1.06 1.14 1.11 1.23 1.13 Freeways 759.15 0.35 0.43 0.40 0.58 0.31 Non-Freeways 6,733.84 1.67 1.74 1.70 1.76 1.82 Primary System 4,959.92 0.99 1.08 1.04 1.15 1.07 Freeways 743.09 0.33 0.41 0.39 0.55 0.30 Non-Freeways 4,216.83 1.70 1.77 1.72 1.76 1.86 Secondary System 2,533.07 1.46 1.52 1.47 1.66 1.51 Freeways 16.06 0.71 0.79 0.67 1.20 0.56 Non-Freeways 2,517.01 1.59 1.65 1.62 1.75 1.68 RURAL State Highway System 6,783.33 0.61 0.63 0.61 0.70 0.60 Freeways 632.10 0.19 0.25 0.23 0.32 0.14 Non-Freeways 6,151.23 0.94 0.93 0.91 0.98 0.94 Primary System 4,442.40 0.53 0.55 0.53 0.61 0.52 Freeways 630.31 0.19 0.25 0.23 0.31 0.14 Non-Freeways 3,812.09 0.88 0.85 0.83 0.89 0.89 Secondary System 2,340.93 1.08 1.14 1.11 1.26 1.08 Freeways 1.79 0.25 0.28 0.16 1.13 0.28 Non-Freeways 2,339.14 1.11 1.17 1.14 1.26 1.11 URBAN State Highway System 709.66 1.98 2.17 2.09 2.25 2.19 Freeways 127.05 0.62 0.73 0.70 1.01 0.59 Non-Freeways 582.61 3.40 3.66 3.52 3.53 3.84 Primary System 517.52 1.95 2.17 2.07 2.23 2.16 Freeways 112.78 0.60 0.71 0.69 0.99 0.58 Non-Freeways 404.74 3.50 3.83 3.67 3.63 3.98 Secondary System 192.14 2.18 2.22 2.14 2.39 2.31 Freeways 14.27 0.79 0.88 0.76 1.22 0.61 Non-Freeways 177.87 2.98 2.97 2.93 3.10 3.27 RURAL includes both the Rural and Suburban shown in Table IV.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    251 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us