DOCSLIB.ORG

July 31, 2017 the Honorable Lindsey Graham the Honorable Patrick

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

1701 K STREET, N.W., SUITE 950 • WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 • PHONE: 202.331.1616 • WWW.BRETTONWOODS.ORG July 31, 2017 The Honorable Lindsey Graham The Honorable Patrick Leahy U.S. Senate U.S. Senate The Honorable Harold Rogers The Honorable Nita Lowey U.S. House of Representatives U.S. House of Representatives Dear Senator Graham, Senator Leahy, Representative Rogers, and Representative Lowey: We are writing in collective support of the authorization and appropriation for the International Development Association (IDA), the World Bank’s fund for the poorest. At a minimum, we request a 3-year authorization of $3.291 billion and appropriation of $1.097 billion for the first year, as per the President’s request. In December 2016, the United States pledged $3.871 billion for the 3-year IDA18 replenishment period. While the House Financial Services Committee has authorized the President’s requested amount, the House State Foreign Operations Appropriations Subcommittee has proposed only $658m for FY2018, a drastic 50% cut from the original U.S. pledge. IDA’s work critically supports U.S. national security. IDA leverages the power of the global community to assist countries where poverty and disease can breed political instability and foster extremism. Good governance, anti-corruption, disease prevention, and infrastructure investment projects promote stability in weak states, which precipitates positive spillover effects on regional and global security. IDA’s rapid response to the Ebola pandemic and the current famine in Sub-Saharan Africa and Yemen proves its capacity to both promote long-term stability and address immediate crises. IDA projects target major underlying drivers of conflict and extremism, fostering a safer world for all Americans. IDA funding champions U.S. global leadership. As the largest shareholder of the World Bank, the United States is the only country that possesses veto power, thus assuring a strong voice for U.S. economic, national security and diplomatic interests and priorities at the institution. Sustained U.S. international leadership proves critical at a time when China and Russia seek to scale up global economic influence. Maintaining the United States’ historical level of support for IDA will ensure and reinforce U.S. leadership on the global stage. IDA produces high development impact at low cost. Over 55 years of experience, global reach, cross-sector knowledge, and rigorous impact measurement solidify IDA as one of the world’s most effective platforms for development. Contributions from over 50 countries coupled with internal resources and funds leveraged through capital markets reduces aid fragmentation and opens new markets to American goods, such as Eastern Europe and Southeast Asia. IDA provides unparalleled HONORARY CO-CHAIRS CHAIRS EMERITI ADVISORY COUNCIL CO-CHAIRS SECRETARY PRESIDENT GEORGE H.W. BUSH E. GERALD CORRIGAN MOHAMED EL-ERIAN JIM KOLBE JAMES C. ORR PRESIDENT JIMMY CARTER HENRY H. FOWLER RUTH PORAT JAMES D. WOLFENSOHN PRESIDENT GERALD R. FORD BILL FRENZEL WILLIAM R. RHODES EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR HENRY OWEN JEAN-CLAUDE TRICHET CHAIR, RANY S. RODGERS PAUL A. VOLCKER SIR DAVID WALKER INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL CHARLS E. WALKER RICHARD A. DEBS value for money: every $1 in IDA donor contributions generates about $3 in financing for the poorest states. We certainly recognize the fiscal pressures the Congress faces, but we urge you to authorize at least $3.291 billion over three years and appropriate $1.097b in FY2018 for IDA, as requested by the President. Sincerely, Jim Kolbe James D. Wolfensohn Randy S. Rodgers Co-Chair Co-Chair Executive Director On behalf of the members of the Bretton Woods Committee, including our U.S. members: Nishith Acharya Eric Anderson R. Michael Barth Calvert Foundation Planetary Resources, Inc. Barth & Associates LLC Renee Acosta Martin Apple David Beckmann Global Justice Center Council Of Scientific Society Bread For The World Presidents Tim Adams Geoffrey Bell Institute of International Finance Paul V. Applegarth Geoffrey Bell & Company, Inc. Value Enhancement International Reena Aggarwal Robert R. Bench Georgetown University Daniel Arbess WorldBoston Perella Weinberg Partners Robert Albertson Lucy Wilson Benson Sandler O'Neill & Partners, L.P. Robert R. Aronsson Apollo Energy Systems, Inc Kenneth E. Bentsen, Jr. Madeleine Albright Securities Industry and Financial Albright Stonebridge Group Norman R. Augustine Markets Association Review of the United States Human Buzz Aldrin Space Flight Plans Committee Robert J. Berg Starbuzz Enterprises Alliance for Peacebuilding James Bacchus Donna Alexander Greenberg Traurig LLP C. Fred Bergsten Advoxum Global Strategies Peterson Institute for International Raymond Baker Economics Sarah E. Alexander Global Financial Integrity Emerging Markets Private Equity Jörg Bibow Richard H. Baker Skidmore College Daniel Alpert Managed Funds Association Westwood Capital, LLC David Biltchik James Baker, III Consultants International Group Cate Ambrose Baker Botts LLP Latin America Private Equity and Nancy M. Birdsall Venture Capital Association Kevin F. Barnard Center for Global Development Arnold & Porter LLP James J. Blanchard Cesare Calari Bill Clapp DLA Piper Wolfensohn & Company LLC Seattle International Foundation Alan S. Blinder Kent Calder Robert L. Clarke Princeton University Johns Hopkins University School of Bracewell LLP Advanced International Studies W. Michael Blumenthal James Clawson Jewish Museum of Berlin Carolyn Campbell University of Virginia Emerging Capital Partners David L. Boren Kevin Cleaver Oklahoma University Frank C. Carlucci Carlyle Group E. Patrick Coady James Boughton Coady Diemar Partners Centre for International Governance Jimmy Carter Innovation The Carter Center Warren Coats IMF (ret.) Colin Bradford Lourdes Casanova The Brookings Institution S.C. Johnson School of Kenneth S. Cohen Management, Cornell Univeristy MassMutual Financial Group Nicholas F. Brady Darby Overseas Investments Kevin Casas-Zamora Rodgin Cohen Inter American Dialogue Sullivan & Cromwell LLP Joseph C. Brandt ContourGlobal Gilbert F. Casellas William Cohen Omnitru Technologies, LLC The Cohen Group Myron Brilliant U.S. Chamber of Commerce Stephen D. Cashin Jean-Marc Coicaud Pan African Capital Group Rutgers University Harry G. Broadman Johns Hopkins University SAIS Gerald S. J. Cassidy Julius E. Coles Cassidy & Associates Andrew Young Center for Global Pierre Brondeau Leadership, Morehouse College FMC Corporation Guillaume Castel The Advisory Board Company Jay Collins Carole L. Brookins Citigroup Public Capital Advisors Michael M. Chamberlin Emerging Markets Traders Mark M. Collins Harold Brown Association Brown Advisory and Trust Center for Strategic and Company International Studies Sandra Charles C&O Resources, Inc John Conroy Giancarlo Bruno Baker & McKenzie World Economic Forum Kenneth I. Chenault American Express Bank Jill M. Considine Ralph C. Bryant LCHClearnet The Brookings Institution Edward J. Chesky State Dept/USAID (ret.) Lawrence S. Cooley Deborah Burand Management Systems International New York University Samuel F. Chevalier West Hill Richard N. Cooper James B. Burnham Harvard University Duquesne University (ret.) Julie Chon Perry Capital E. Gerald Corrigan Edward Burton The Challenger Foundation U.S.-Saudi Arabian Business Aysha Chowdhry Council RiceHadleyGates LLC David A. Coulter Warburg Pincus LLC Landon Butler James Claire Landon Butler & Co. Mizuho Securities Sam Y. Cross Patricia Mary Dinneen Thomas L. Farmer International Monetary Fund (Ret.) EMPEA International Consultants Group, Inc. Alexander B. Cummings Patrick F. Dolan Acadia Fund, LP Diana Farrell Jason Cummins J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. Brevan Howard Donald F. Donahue Miranda Partners, LLC Patrick Fay Nelson Cunningham Mizuho Securities USA, Inc. McLarty Associates John Donaldson The World Bank Group (ret.) Martin Feldstein W. Bowman Cutter Harvard University Roosevelt Institute Peter Donaldson Niall Ferguson David D. Cutting Craig S. Donohue Harvard University The Options Clearing Corporation J. Dewey Daane Michael Feroli Owen Graduate School of Cal Dooley J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. Management American Chemistry Council Stanley Fischer Ray Dalio William Drozdiak Board of Governors of the Federal Bridgewater Associates Inc. McLarty Associates Reserve System Michael T. Dan John Dugan Dennis Flannery Blue Heron Capital Covington & Burling LLP Citigroup Stephen J. Dannhauser Robert H. Edwards, Jr. Gail Fosler Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton The GailFosler Group LLC LLP Onno de Beaufort Wijnholds Richard Frank Financial Consultant (independent) Khaled El Ghorab Darby Overseas National Bank of Egypt - New York Investments/Franklin Templeton Whitney Debevoise Branch Arnold & Porter Tony Fratto Mohamed El-Erian Hamilton Place Strategies Richard A. Debs Allianz Morgan Stanley Jendayi E. Frazer Anthony Elson Columbia University David Deese Johns Hopkins SAIS & Duke Boston College Center for International Daniel Freifeld Development Callaway Capital Management LLC Raj M. Desai Georgetown University Warren E. Emblidge Jacob Frenkel McCullagh International J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. Ross DeVol Milken Institute Joseph Engelhard Bart Friedman Metlife Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP Rimmer deVries John Engler Zack Friedman Thelma Diaz Business Roundtable Mina Group Independent Consultant Robert Fagenson Joan M. Frost Robert L. Dilenschneider National Holdings Corporation The Dillon Fund The Dilenschneider Group Marina Fanning Martin Frost James Dimon Management
Recommended publications
  • The Oecd at the Turn of the Century: the World's Window on Globalization

    The Oecd at the Turn of the Century: the World's Window on Globalization

    THE REINVENTING BRETTON WOODS COMMITTEE THE OECD AT THE TURN OF THE CENTURY: THE WORLD'S WINDOW ON GLOBALIZATION Conference Report and Recommendations April 4-5, 1997 New York City May 1997 CONTENTS Foreword .......................................................................................................................... 3 Executive Summary ........................................................................................................ 5 Recommendations ........................................................................................................... 7 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 10 CHAPTER ONE: Why the OECD Needs Reform Part I. The Loss of Identity of the OECD ................................................ 13 Part II. A Pioneer and Interdisciplinary Institution .................................. 16 CHAPTER TWO: Regaining an Identity as the World's Window on Globalization Part I. A Window on Globalization ........................................................ 19 Part II. The OECD at the Crossroads of Cooperation between Old and New World's Major Players ............................................................................... 21 Part III. An Undisputed Forum for Assisting Non- and Future Members .. 23 CHAPTER THREE: Challenges Ahead: Membership, Governance and Visibility Part I. Definition of a Clear Membership ............................................... 26 Part II. Improving Efficiency by Reforming
  • U.S. Department of State Ejournal 15 (February 2010)

    U.S. Department of State Ejournal 15 (February 2010)

    The Bureau of International Information Programs of the U.S. Department of State publishes a monthly electronic journal under the eJournal USA logo. These journals U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE / FEBRuaRY 2010 examine major issues facing the United States and the VOLUME 15 / NUMBER 2 international community, as well as U.S. society, values, http://www.america.gov/publications/ejournalusa.html thought, and institutions. International Information Programs: One new journal is published monthly in English and is Coordinator Daniel Sreebny followed by versions in French, Portuguese, Russian, and Executive Editor Jonathan Margolis Spanish. Selected editions also appear in Arabic, Chinese, Creative Director Michael Jay Friedman and Persian. Each journal is catalogued by volume and number. Editor-in-Chief Richard W. Huckaby Managing Editor Bruce Odessey The opinions expressed in the journals do not necessarily Production Manager/Web Producer Janine Perry reflect the views or policies of the U.S. government. The Graphic Designer Sylvia Scott U.S. Department of State assumes no responsibility for the content and continued accessibility of Internet sites Copy Editor Rosalie Targonski to which the journals link; such responsibility resides Photo Editor Maggie Sliker solely with the publishers of those sites. Journal articles, Cover Designer Diane Woolverton photographs, and illustrations may be reproduced and Graph Designers Vincent Hughes translated outside the United States unless they carry Reference Specialist Martin Manning explicit copyright restrictions, in which case permission must be sought from the copyright holders noted in the journal. Front Cover: © Getty Images The Bureau of International Information Programs maintains current and back issues in several electronic formats at http://www.america.gov/publications/ejournalusa.
  • U.S. Trade and Investment Policy

    U.S. Trade and Investment Policy

    U.S. Trade and Investment Policy and Investment U.S. Trade The Council on Foreign Relations sponsors Independent Task Forces to assess issues of current and critical importance to U.S. foreign policy and provide policymakers with con- crete judgments and recommendations. Diverse in backgrounds and perspectives, Task Force members aim to reach a meaningful consensus on policy through private and non- partisan deliberations. Once launched, Task Forces are independent of CFR and solely re- sponsible for the content of their reports. Task Force members are asked to join a consensus signifying that they endorse “the general policy thrust and judgments reached by the group, WKRXJKQRWQHFHVVDULO\HYHU\ÀQGLQJDQGUHFRPPHQGDWLRQµ(DFK7DVN)RUFHPHPEHUDOVR KDVWKHRSWLRQRISXWWLQJIRUZDUGDQDGGLWLRQDORUDGLVVHQWLQJYLHZ0HPEHUV·DIÀOLDWLRQV DUHOLVWHGIRULGHQWLÀFDWLRQSXUSRVHVRQO\DQGGRQRWLPSO\LQVWLWXWLRQDOHQGRUVHPHQW7DVN Force observers participate in discussions, but are not asked to join the consensus. Task Force Members Edward Alden James W. Owens Council on Foreign Relations Caterpillar, Inc. Nancy Birdsall William F. Owens Center for Global Development University of Denver James J. Blanchard Pamela S. Passman DLA Piper LLP Microsoft Corporation Andrew H. Card Matthew J. Slaughter Texas A&M University, Fleischman-Hillard Council on Foreign Relations; Thomas A. Daschle Dartmouth University DLA Piper LLP Andrew L. Stern I.M. (Mac) Destler Georgetown University University of Maryland William M. Thomas Harold E. Ford, Jr. American Enterprise Institute for Public Morgan Stanley Policy Research Leo Gerard* Laura D’Andrea Tyson United Steelworkers University of California Berkeley Independent Task Force Report No. 67 Daniel R. Glickman John K. Veroneau Aspen Institute Congressional Program; Covington and Burling LLP Independent Task Force Report No. 67 Report Force Task Independent Andrew H.
  • Eurasia Foundation Network

    Eurasia Foundation Network

    Engaging Citizens Empowering Communities Eurasia2009 Network Foundation Yearbook Engaging Citizens, Empowering Communities Eurasia Foundation Network EURASIA FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL ASIA TABLE OF CONTENTS Advisory Council, Board of Trustees.....................1 2009 Letter from the Chair and President..............................2 The Eurasia Foundation Network......................................3 Yearbook Overview.....................................4 New Eurasia Foundation.................................5 Eurasia Foundation of Central Asia..........................6 Eurasia Partnership Foundation.................................7 East Europe Foundation.................................8 Youth Engagement...................9 Local Economic Development...........................11 Public Policy and The Eurasia Foundation Network comprises New Eurasia Foundation (Russia), Eurasia Foundation of Central Asia, Eurasia Partnership InstitutionFoundation Building.................13 (Caucasus), East Europe Foundation (Ukraine, Belarus, Moldova) and Eurasia Foundation (United States). Since 1993, Eurasia Foundation and the network have invested more than $360 million in local and cross-border projects to promote civic and economic inclusion throughout the Eurasia region.Independent Media.................15 For more information about the Eurasia Foundation Network, please visit http://www.eurasia.org/ Cross-Border Programs ........17 Eurasia Foundation Financials..................................19 EAST EUROPE EURASIA FOUNDATION EFFOUNDATION Network
  • September 6, 2019 the Honorable

    September 6, 2019 the Honorable

    1701 K STREET, N.W., SUITE 950 • WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 • PHONE: 202.331.1616 • WWW.BRETTONWOODS.ORG September 6, 2019 The Honorable James E. Risch The Honorable Bob Menendez Chairman Ranking Member Committee on Foreign Relations Committee on Foreign Relations United States Senate United States Senate Dear Senator Risch and Senator Menendez: We write to ask that you support both the authorization and appropriations for the general capital increase (GCI) for the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD) and the International Finance Corporation (IFC) of the World Bank Group. As you know, the World Bank Group’s shareholders endorsed an ambitious package of measures for the capital increase in 2018. It includes internal reforms and a set of policy measures that greatly strengthens the institution’s ability to scale up resources and deliver on its mission of fighting global poverty. It was developed in response to an increasingly complex development landscape and to confront emerging challenges to the global economy which will require a coordinated and sustained effort. The Bank has also developed, for the first time, a comprehensive strategy to address fragility, conflict and violence in countries where assistance is needed the most. It is important that the United States supports this effort because it: • Promotes National Security Interests World Bank support to countries where poverty and disease can breed political instability and foster extremism is vital to U.S. national security interests. World Bank projects promote stability in weak states and help mitigate cross-border problems – such as the Ebola outbreak and refugee crises – which precipitates positive spillover effects on national, regional, and global security fostering a safer world for all Americans.
  • April 2000 – February 2001)

    April 2000 – February 2001)

    U.S. Commission on National Security/21st Century (click on heading to be linked directly to that section) Phase 1 (July 1998 - August 1999) Major Themes And Implications Supporting Research And Analysis Phase 2 (August 2000 – April 2000) Seeking A National Strategy: A Concert For Preserving Security And Promoting Freedom Phase 3 (April 2000 – February 2001) Roadmap For National Security: Imperative For Change 71730_DAPS.qx 10/12/99 5:06 PM Page #1 NEW WORLD COMING: AMERICAN SECURITY IN THE 21ST CENTURY MAJOR THEMES AND IMPLICATIONS The Phase I Report on the Emerging Global Security Environment for the First Quarter of the 21st Century The United States Commission on National Security/21st Century September 15, 1999 71730_DAPS.qx 10/12/99 5:06 PM Page #3 Preface In 1947, President Harry Truman signed into law the National Security Act, the landmark U.S. national security legislation of the latter half of the 20th century. The 1947 legislation has served us well. It has undergirded our diplomatic efforts, provided the basis to establish our military capa- bilities, and focused our intelligence assets. But the world has changed dramatically in the last fifty years, and particularly in the last decade. Institutions designed in another age may or may not be appropriate for the future. It is the mandate of the United States Commission on National Security/21st Century to examine precise- ly that question. It has undertaken to do so in three phases: the first to describe the world emerging in the first quarter of the next century, the second to design a national security strategy appropri- ate to that world, and the third to propose necessary changes to the national security structure in order to implement that strategy effectively.
  • Reforming the International Monetary System: from Roosevelt to Reagan

    Reforming the International Monetary System: from Roosevelt to Reagan

    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 384 560 SO 025 006 AUTHOR Hormats, Robert D. TITLE Reforming the International Monetary System: From Roosevelt to Reagan. Headline Series No. 281. INSTITUTION Foreign Policy Association, New York, N.Y. REPORT NO ISBN-0-87124-113-7; ISSN-0017-8780 PUB DATE Jun 87 NOTE 84p. AVAILABLE FROM Foreign Policy Association, 729 Seventh Avenue, New fork, NY 10019 ($5.95). PUB TYPE Books (010) Guides Non-Classroom Use (055) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC04 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Banking; Economic Change; Economics; *Finance Reform; Financial Policy; Financial Problems; *Foreign Policy; Higher Education; International Cooperation; *International Organizations; International Programs; *International Relations; International Studies; *International Trade; *Monetary Systems; Money Management; Secondary Education IDENTIFIERS *International Monetary Fund; Reagan (Ronald); Roosevelt (Franklin D) ABSTRACT This book examines the changed, and .anging, international monetary system.It describes how the system has evolved under nine Presidents, from Franklin D. Roosevelt to Ronald Reagan. It also discusses the broader evolution of the world economy during this period, including the trade and investment issues to which international monetary policy is closely linked. The subjects are predominantly international but have a major impact on domestic economies. These international effects are why they should be of concern to most people. The dollar is viewed as both a national and an international money. The International Monetary Fund (IMF)is viewed as
  • September 6, 2019 the Honorable Lindsey Graham the Honorable

    September 6, 2019 the Honorable Lindsey Graham the Honorable

    1701 K STREET, N.W., SUITE 950 • WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 • PHONE: 202.331.1616 • WWW.BRETTONWOODS.ORG September 6, 2019 The Honorable Lindsey Graham The Honorable Patrick Leahy Chairman Ranking Member State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Committee on Appropriations Committee on Appropriations United States Senate United States Senate Dear Senator Graham and Senator Leahy: We write to ask that you support both the authorization and appropriations for the general capital increase (GCI) for the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD) and the International Finance Corporation (IFC) of the World Bank Group. As you know, the World Bank Group’s shareholders endorsed an ambitious package of measures for the capital increase in 2018. It includes internal reforms and a set of policy measures that greatly strengthens the institution’s ability to scale up resources and deliver on its mission of fighting global poverty. It was developed in response to an increasingly complex development landscape and to confront emerging challenges to the global economy which will require a coordinated and sustained effort. The Bank has also developed, for the first time, a comprehensive strategy to address fragility, conflict and violence in countries where assistance is needed the most. It is important that the United States supports this effort because it: • Promotes National Security Interests World Bank support to countries where poverty and disease can breed political instability and foster extremism is vital to U.S. national security interests. World Bank projects promote stability in weak states and help mitigate cross-border problems – such as the Ebola outbreak and refugee crises – which precipitates positive spillover effects on national, regional, and global security fostering a safer world for all Americans.
  • Engineering Empire

    Engineering Empire

    2013 Engineering Empire: An Introduction to the Intellectuals and Institutions of American Imperialism in the Age of Obama Engineering Empire: An Introduction to the Intellectuals and Institutions of American Imperialism in the Age of Obama A 2013 Hampton Institute report by Andrew Gavin Marshall Hampton Institute a proletarian think tank www.hamptonthink.org 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEERING EMPIRE ……………………………. 3 Meet the Engineers of Empire …… 4 Dynastic Influence on Foreign Policy …. 5 Intellectuals, 'Experts,' and Imperialists Par Excellence: Kissinger and Brzezinski ……. 8 From Cold War to New World Order: 'Containment' to 'Enlargement' …. 11 The Road to "Hope" and "Change" …. 16 CSIS: The 'Brain' of the Obama Administration … 18 Imperialism Without Imperialists? ….. 25 Notes …. 26 EMPIRE UNDER OBAMA, PART 1: POLITICAL LANGUAGE AND THE ‘MAFIA PRINCIPLES’ OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS ……. 30 Mafia Principles and Western 'Values' …. 33 Notes …. 39 EMPIRE UNDER OBAMA, PART 2: BARACK OBAMA’S GLOBAL TERROR CAMPAIGN … 41 Notes … 48 EMPIRE UNDER OBAMA, PART 3: AMERICA’S “SECRET WARS” IN OVER 100 COUNTRIES AROUND THE WORLD ……. 51 Notes …. 57 EMPIRE UNDER OBAMA, PART 4: COUNTERINSURGENCY, DEATH SQUADS, AND THE POPULATION AS A TARGET …… 60 Notes …. 68 2 Educating yourself about empire can be a challenging endeavor, especially since so much of the educational system is dedicated to avoiding the topic or justifying the actions of imperialism in the modern era. If one studies political science or economics, the subject might be discussed in a historical context, but rarely as a modern reality; media and government voices rarely speak on the subject, and even more rarely speak of it with direct and honest language.
  • Revitalizing the Spirit of Bretton Woods 50 Perspectives on the Future of the Global Economic System

    Revitalizing the Spirit of Bretton Woods 50 Perspectives on the Future of the Global Economic System

    REVITALIZING THE SPIRIT OF BRETTON WOODS 50 PERSPECTIVES ON THE FUTURE OF THE GLOBAL ECONOMIC SYSTEM The Bretton Woods Committee REVITALIZING THE SPIRIT OF BRETTON WOODS 50 PERSPECTIVES ON THE FUTURE OF THE GLOBAL ECONOMIC SYSTEM JULY 2019 The Bretton Woods Committee ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Bretton Woods@75 Compendium membership and stakeholder network, is a unique and timely publication, though they do not purport to represent issued to honor a historic year for the the views of all Committee members Bretton Woods institutions, and during or to serve as the collective voice of the an extraordinary moment in history Bretton Woods Committee. for the global, rules-based system that Such a monumental effort could not they have operated through and helped have taken place without a great deal of to strengthen since their inception in support from a handful of individuals 1944. As the world celebrates the his- who are exceptionally dedicated to the toric milestone of the 75th anniversary Bretton Woods Committee. Production of the Bretton Woods Conference (for- of this volume was conceived, planned, mally known as the United Nations and implemented by the Committee sec- Monetary and Financial Conference) in retariat team, based in Washington, D.C.: July 2019, the rules-based international Randy Rodgers, Emily Slater, Brooke economic system and its staunchest sup- Snowdon, and Kasey Stelter, with support porters face a significant challenge: how from Melissa Smith and Hana Barkett. to ensure that the global economic system Direction and advisory support were evolves and endures to meet the challenges provided by Bretton Woods Committee of this and the next generation.
  • SENATE, Ment of the Indispensable Man

    SENATE, Ment of the Indispensable Man

    1945 CONGRESSIONAL RE-CORD-SENAT-E 7587 at this time.· It is· truly amazing, in light brought about, or in order that the two DESIGNATION OF ACTING PRESID~""T of the arguments presented during _the last States may begin negotiations, it is urg­ PRO TEMPORE campaign, that Mr. Truman's index-of pop­ ent that the bill be passed now. ularity as measured by a Gallup poll exceeds The Chief Clerk read the following that of Mr. Roosevelt at the peak of his pop­ Mr. BURTON. Both States have al­ letter: ularity. Mr. Truman has nullified the argu­ ready approved the .;hange in the agree­ UNITED STATES SENATE, ment of the indispensable man. ment. It is desired to obtain the con­ PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE, In all truth it is a tribute to the vitality sent of Congress so that the modification washington, D. c., July 17, 1945. of our democracy that it survived the frus­ may be effective at once. To the Senate: tr~ttion of which Mr. Lippmann has written. The PRESIDENT pro tempore. Is Being temporarily absent from the Senate, It is pertinent nonetheless, to ask why there objection to the present consider­ I appoint Han. WALTER F. GEORGE, a Senator democracy should not have been put to this from the State of Georgia, to perform the test. Basically it stems from the vast power ation of the bill? duties of the Chair during my absence. of the Presidency, always vast but in these There being no objection, the bill <H. KENNETH McKELLAR, days of big government still vaster.
  • Paul A. Volcker Papers Call Number: MC279 Box 25

    Paul A. Volcker Papers Call Number: MC279 Box 25

    Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Collection: Paul A. Volcker Papers Call Number: MC279 Box 25 Preferred Citation: Bretton Woods, 1984-1985; Paul A. Volcker Papers, Box 25; Public Policy Papers, Department of Rare Books and Special Collections, Princeton University Library Find it online: http://findingaids.princeton.edu/collections/MC279/c150 and https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/archival/5297 The digitization ofthis collection was made possible by the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. From the collections of the Seeley G. Mudd Manuscript Library, Princeton, NJ These documents can only be used for educational and research purposes ("fair use") as per United States copyright law. By accessing this file, all users agree that their use falls within fair use as defined by the copyright law of the United States. They further agree to request permission of the Princeton University Library (and pay any fees, if applicable) if they plan to publish, broadcast, or otherwise disseminate this material. This includes all forms of electronic distribution. Copyright The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specified conditions is that the photocopy or other reproduction is not to be "used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship or research." If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or other reproduction for purposes not permitted as fair use under the copyright law of the United States, that user may be liable for copyright infringement.