The Alumni Issue: Media
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Issue 1 ReviewTHE HORACE MANN The Alumni Issue: Media Volume XXVIII - September 2018 THE HORACE MANN Letter From the Editor Review Table of Contents Pana Persianis Editor-in-Chief The State of our Unions 4 Social Media and Protest Movements 22FEATURES DOMESTIC Alexa Mark ‘20 page 4 Sean Koons Silvia Wang ‘19 page 22 Ryan Leung Executive Editors The California Wildfires Jacob Rosenzweig ‘20 page 6 The Rise of Partisanship in the Will Han Sajan Mehrotra Media Aaron Snyder Jeren Wei Noah Phillips ‘20 page 26 Managing Editors Your Primary Concern Ben Rosenzweig ‘20 page 8 Ari Moscona-Skolnik Trump and Fox vs. the Others Deputy Editor ello Horace Mann! I hope that everyone had a great start to the new Reha Mathur ‘20 page 28 school year. During the summer, writers and editors have been putting together the first issue of The Horace Mann Review volume XXVIII. The Nader Granmayeh “Serial Misdiagnosis”: Gender Hfirst issue of The Review for each volume is always the alumni issue, which is Senior Editor - Domestic Disparities and Bias in Healthcare unlike the other issues because the editorial board invites alumni to participate Solomon Katz Zoe Mavrides ‘18 page 10 Cleaning Up Social Media in the writing. It is clear evidence of the warm community spirit of Horace Mann Senior Editor - International Arman Kumar ‘20 page 30 that alumni return years after their graduation to contribute their perspective to Ethan Kim The Review. Senior Editor - Features Richard Hausman The Review continues to be a great way for students to voice their opinions on cur- Senior Editor - Economics rent events. For this issue, the editorial board chose media as the feature topic. Es- 12 Universal Basic Income Dana Jacoby, Silvia Wang INTERNATIONAL Why Immigration Won the pecially in light of the recent attention news outlets have received for partisanship, 32ECONOMICS Senior Editors - Science and Technology 2018 FIFA World Cup Lauren Futter ‘15 page 32 media is a timely topic in the sphere of global events. The topics of our articles Kyra Hill ‘18 page 12 range widely within the topic of media, from exploring the relationship between Aneesh Bafna Trump and Fox to looking at the ways governments could effectively “clean up” Arman Kumar Ben Doolan social media. I hope that our articles on media will lead to some interesting dis- Alexa J. Mark Pratham Gandhi MoviePass cussions. Reha Mathur Tommy Kagan Taimur Moolji The Rohingya Crisis Owen Karpf ‘20 page 34 Ishaan Kannan Beyond media, our writers covered many pertinent topics, both domestically and Noah Phillips Lexi Kanter ‘17 page 14 Owen Karpf Ben Rosenzweig internationally. Our other four sections are Domestic, International, Economics, Oliver Keimweiss and Sci-Tech. In this issue, writers commented on topics such as unions, gender Jacob Rosenzweig Helena Kopans-Johnson Are Big Businesses Bad? disparities in healthcare, and universal basic income. Junior Editors Russian Meddling in the US Oliver Keimweiss ‘20 page 36 I’m very grateful for the dedication of both alumni and students to the making Taimur Moolji ‘20 page 16 of this issue. I would like to thank everyone - sophomores, juniors, seniors, and Laura Weinstein alumni - for their insightful contributions to this issue. A special thank you to our Jonathan Kotchian The Legalization of 3-D Printed editorial board and junior editors for their valuable ideas and hard work. It is an Faculty Advisors 38 Guns honor for me to be trusted to continue the legacy of this award-winning publica- Kerala Flooding SCI-TECH David Puckowitz ‘21 page 38 tion. I would like to thank our dedicated faculty advisors, Dr. Kotchian and Dr. The Horace Mann Review is a member of the Columbia Scholastic Press Association, the American Scholastic Press Ben Doolan ‘20 page 18 Weinstein, and last year’s Editor-in-Chief and Executive Editors, Zoe Mavrides, Association, and the National Scholastic Press Association. Opinions expressed in articles or illustrations are not necessar- Kyra Hill, and Ethan Finley, for their guidance and support throughout the transi- ily those of the Editorial Board or of the Horace Mann School. Polygenic Scores tion. While we welcome our new faculty advisors, we would also like to thank our Gloria Khafif ‘20 outgoing faculty advisor, Mr. Donadio, for his years of invaluable support. Fair Use Notice Google’s Censored Chinese page 40 This publication contains or may contain copyrighted material, the use of Search Engine I am looking forward to a great year! Enjoy the issue! which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding Ishaan Kannan ‘20 page 20 of issues of economic, political, scientific, and humanitarian significance. We believe this constitutes a “fair use” of any such copyrighted material as provid- Public by Default, Pana Persianis ed for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 Venmo’s Data Vulnerability Editor-in-Chief U.S.C. Section 107, this publication is distributed without profit for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this Pratham Gandhi ‘20 page 42 Volume XXVIII publication for purposes of your own that go beyond “fair use,” you must ob- tain permission from the copyright owner. fff fff 2 3 Domestic Domestic ith unionization in the U.S. al- nus was not a free-rider, but rather “a per- to attract more members, and can do so by ready at a historic low of 10.7% son shanghaied for an unwanted voyage.” following the example of similarly affected in 2017, the Supreme Court has Though the decision doesn’t apply to and unions. In the Harris v. Quinn Supreme Wdealt a huge blow to unions in the recent is therefore unlikely to affect unions in the Court decision, the Court decided that re- Janus v. AFSCME decision. The 5-4 deci- private sector, the bulk of union members quiring home aid to pay agency fees violat- sion in favor of Mark Janus has effectively work in the public sector, making this de- ed their First Amendment rights. As such, put in place “right to work” laws nation- cision incredibly impactful. Currently, only home-care unions were affected in the wide by ruling that it is unconstitutional 6.7% of private sector employees are union- same way that public-sector unions are cur- to require public employees to pay agency ized, while 35.5% of public sector employ- rently being affected by the Janus decision. fees to unions under the First Amendment. ees are unionized. Those arguing on the The United Domestic Workers of America Under the Taft-Hartley Act in 1947, “closed side of “right to work”legislation and the re- (UDW), one of the unions representing shops” were outlawed, meaning that em- cent Supreme Court decision have claimed home-care workers, was at first harmed af- ployees were no longer required to join a that unions will not suffer because unions ter the decision, with its membership drop- union in order to be eligible for hire. How- still exist in “right to work” states. However, ping from 68,000 workers to 48,000 work- ever, this act did not affect the existence of there has been a drop in union membership ers. However, the UDW is now thriving and “union shops,” where employees were not in all such places. One example is Wiscon- has 75,000 members. The UDW has been required to unionize in order to be hired, sin, which saw its union membership drop able to succeed after its initial setback by but were required to meet with union rep- from 16% in 2009 to 8.1% in 2016 and its me- providing services other than mere wage resentatives and pay agency fees (around dian salary for teachers drop 12.6%. Some bargaining. The union launched a service 78% of the cost of union dues) to the experts claim that Wisconsin is an extreme that matched members with potential cli- unions in return for services like represen- example, as there were laws passed other ents and provided free classes to members tation in collective bargaining after being than “right to work” that weakened unions. on topics such as CPR and dietary restric- hired. The Janus decision is in line with the Even so, reports have found that unioniza- tions to help members in their profession. “right to work” laws currently in place in tion has fallen 5-10% after the passage of By doing so, the union has provided valu- twenty-eight states, all of which ban agency right to work legislation alone, and studies able services to members for a lesser cost, fees, but still require unions to represent all estimate that unionization in the public attracting more members. Without agen- employees in collective bargaining. Because sector will decrease by 8.2 % points because cy fees, unions will have to attract more employees know that they will be repre- of the Janus decision. Economists explain members in order to increase their reve- sented whether or not they pay fees, it is not that over time workers will “bail out,” leav- nue, and will be able to do so if they pro- in their best interest to pay the fees, causing ing unions with less money and support. vide new services to entice workers to join. unions to lose both revenue and members. Unions are vital to the protection of qual- The Janus decision is by no means the The decision in Janus v. AFSCME over- ity of life for many workers throughout the end of unionization in the American pub- turned the precedent set in the 1977 Su- U.S.