DOCSLIB.ORG

Legislative Review Activities of the Committee on International Relations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Legislative Review Activities of the Committee on International Relations 1 Union Calendar No. 485 104TH CONGRESS REPORT 2d Session HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 104±883 "! LEGISLATIVE REVIEW ACTIVITIES OF THE COMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS One Hundred Fourth Congress A REPORT FILED PURSUANT TO SECTION 136 OF THE LEGISLATIVE REORGA- NIZATION ACT OF 1946 (2 U.S.C. 190d), AS AMENDED BY SECTION 118 OF THE LEGISLATIVE REORGANIZATION ACT OF 1970 (PUB- LIC LAW 91±510), AS AMENDED BY PUBLIC LAW 92±136 JANUARY 2, 1997.ÐCommitted to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 39±006 WASHINGTON : 1997 COMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS BENJAMIN A. GILMAN, New York, Chairman WILLIAM F. GOODLING, Pennsylvania LEE H. HAMILTON, Indiana JAMES A. LEACH, Iowa SAM GEJDENSON, Connecticut TOBY ROTH, Wisconsin TOM LANTOS, California HENRY J. HYDE, Illinois ROBERT G. TORRICELLI, New Jersey DOUG BEREUTER, Nebraska HOWARD L. BERMAN, California CHRISTOPHER H. SMITH, New Jersey GARY L. ACKERMAN, New York DAN BURTON, Indiana HARRY JOHNSTON, Florida JAN MEYERS, Kansas ENI F.H. FALEOMAVAEGA, American ELTON GALLEGLY, California Samoa ILEANA ROS-LEHTINEN, Florida MATTHEW G. MARTINEZ, California CASS BALLENGER, North Carolina DONALD M. PAYNE, New Jersey DANA ROHRABACHER, California ROBERT E. ANDREWS, New Jersey DONALD A. MANZULLO, Illinois ROBERT MENENDEZ, New Jersey EDWARD R. ROYCE, California SHERROD BROWN, Ohio PETER T. KING, New York CYNTHIA A. MCKINNEY, Georgia JAY KIM, California ALCEE L. HASTINGS, Florida SAM BROWNBACK, Kansas ALBERT RUSSELL WYNN, Maryland DAVID FUNDERBURK, North Carolina JAMES P. MORAN, Virginia STEVEN J. CHABOT, Ohio VICTOR O. FRAZER, Virgin Islands (Ind.) MARSHALL ``MARK'' SANFORD, South CHARLIE ROSE, North Carolina Carolina PAT DANNER, Missouri MATT SALMON, Arizona EARL HILLIARD, Alabama AMO HOUGHTON, New York TOM CAMPBELL, California JON FOX, Pennsylvania RICHARD J. GARON, Chief of Staff MICHAEL H. VAN DUSEN, Democratic Chief of Staff (II) C O N T E N T S Page Foreword ................................................................................................................... V Letter of Transmittal ............................................................................................... VII I. Introduction: Oversight in the foreign affairs field ........................................... 1 A. Authorities for legislative review ............................................................... 1 B. Recent oversight development in the Committee on International Rela- tions ................................................................................................................ 3 C. Oversight activities and criteria ................................................................. 5 D. Oversight Activities of the CommitteeÐ104th Congress ......................... 6 II. General review activities of the committee ...................................................... 20 A. Executive branch reports ............................................................................ 20 B. Reference documents ................................................................................... 20 1. Legislation on Foreign Relations ......................................................... 20 2. Legislative Calendar ............................................................................. 20 C. Study missions and participation in international conferences and events ............................................................................................................. 21 III. Summaries of legislative activities by full committee and subcommittees .. 21 IV. List of hearings and markups by full committee and subcommittees .......... 25 A. Full committee ............................................................................................. 25 B. Subcommittee on Africa .............................................................................. 33 C. Subcommittee on Asia and the Pacific ....................................................... 35 D. Subcommittee on International Economic Policy and Trade ................... 39 E. Subcommittee on International Operations and Human Rights ............. 42 F. Subcommittee on the Western Hemisphere ............................................... 46 Separate views of the Ranking Democratic Member ............................................ 48 Appendixes: I. Hearings published by the Committee on International Relations during the 104th Congress .............................................................................................. 51 II. Witnesses before full committee and subcommittees during the 104th Congress ................................................................................................................ 61 A. Congressional ............................................................................................... 61 B. Executive Branch ......................................................................................... 64 C. Non-Governmental ....................................................................................... 81 D. Foreign Dignitaries and U.S. Officials ....................................................... 110 III. Committee Origins and History ....................................................................... 117 IV. Meetings of the Committee on International Relations from 64th Congress through 104th Congress ...................................................................................... 121 V. Members of the subcommittees of the Committee on International Rela- tions (80th±104th Congresses) ............................................................................ 125 VI. Chairmen of the House Foreign Affairs Committee ....................................... 159 VII. Committee on International Relations legislative progress chart ............... 161 (III) FOREWORD HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, COMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS, Washington, DC, January 2, 1997. Under rule X of the Rules of the House of Representatives and section 136 of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946, the Com- mittee on International Relations is authorized to exercise continu- ous surveillance of the execution by the executive branch of laws within the committee's jurisdiction. The review of ``oversight'' ac- tivities of the Committee on International Relations was aug- mented by the adoption of section 118 of the Legislative Reorga- nization Act of 1970 (Public Law 91±150), as amended by Public Law 92±136. This provision requires standing committees of the House and the Senate after January 1, 1973, to make reports to their respective Houses on their activities in reviewing and study- ing the ``application, administration, and execution of those laws or parts of laws, the subject of which is within the jurisdiction of that committee. House committees are required to file such reports ``not later than January 2 of each odd-numbered year.'' It is in fulfillment of the obligation of the Committee on International Relations to ac- count to the House for its legislative review activities during the 104th Congress that this report has been prepared and submitted. The report was prepared by Laura L. Rush, Legislative Coordina- tor for the Committee. (V) LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, COMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS, Washington, DC, January 2, 1997. Hon. ROBIN H. CARLE, Clerk of the House of Representatives, Washington, DC. DEAR MS. CARLE: I enclose herewith a report for the 104th Con- gress of the Legislative Review Activities of the Committee on International Relations in accordance with section 136 of the Legis- lative Reorganization Act of 1946, as amended by section 118 of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1970, as amended by Public Law 92±136. With best wishes, Sincerely, BENJAMIN A. GILMAN, Chairman. (VII) Union Calendar No. 485 104TH CONGRESS REPORT 2d Session HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 104±883 "! LEGISLATIVE REVIEW ACTIVITIES JANUARY 2, 1997.ÐCommitted to the Committee on the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed Mr. GILMAN, from the Committee on International Relations, submitted the following REPORT I. INTRODUCTION: OVERSIGHT IN THE FOREIGN AFFAIRS FIELD A. Authorities for Legislative Review The responsibilities and potentialities of legislative review are re- flected in the multiple authorities which are available to the Com- mittee on International Relations. The most prominent is section 118 of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1970 (Public Law 91± 510): LEGISLATIVE REVIEW BY STANDING COMMITTEES OF THE SENATE AND HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES (a) Scope of assistance. In order to assist the Congress inÐ (1) Its analysis, appraisal, and evaluation of the application, administration, and execution of the laws enacted by the Con- gress, and (2) Its formulation, consideration, and enactment of such modifications of or changes in those laws, and of such addi- tional legislation, as may be necessary or appropriate, each standing committee of the Senate and the House of Represent- atives shall review and study, on a continuing basis, the appli- cation, administration, and execution of those laws, or parts of laws, the subject matter of which is within the jurisdiction of that committee. Such committees may carry out the required analysis, appraisals, and evaluation themselves, or by contract, or may require a Government agency to do so and furnish a 2 report thereon to the Congress. Such committees may rely on such techniques as pilot testing, analysis of costs
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Report of the Redistricting Committee to the Service
    REPORT OF THE REDISTRICTING COMMITTEE TO THE SERVICE COMMITTEE OF THE LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL The Redistricting Committee of the Legislative Council, consisting of Senators JoAnn Johnson, Jeff Angelo, and John Kibbie, and Representatives Bob Brunkhorst, Steve Falck, and Janet Metcalf, met on June 26, 2000, in the Reagen Conference Room in the State Capitol. Senators Johnson, Angelo, and Kibbie, and Representative Metcalf were present Representative Brunkhorst was present by conference telephone call. The Committee makes the following report and recommendations to the Service Committee: 1. That the Redistricting Committee received the following redistricting information: • Redistricting Quick Takes describing Iowa's unique statutory redistricting process • Summary of 1989-1991 preparations for redistricting • Redistricting Phase 3 budget authorization request • Iowa Code chapter 42 governing Iowa's redistricting process • 2000-2001 redistricting timetable • 1981 and 1991 newspaper clippings regarding Iowa's redistricting process • Redistricting issues for consideration by the Redistricting Committee 2. That the Legislative Service Bureau, in cooperation with the four caucus staffs, respond to the United States Bureau of the Census' solicitation of requests for receipt of Census 2000 Data and Geographic Products to be provided to the Iowa General Assembly, at no cost, pursuant to federal statute. 3. That the Service Committee recommend to the Legislative Council the approval of the negotiation and entering into of a contract between the Legislative Council and a vendor for Phase 3 of redistricting (the proposal and enactment of congressional and legislative redistricting plans), and that the Chairperson and Vice Chairperson of the Legislative Council, in consultation with the Minority Leaders, be authorized to approve the final contract, after continuing consultation with the members of the Redistricting Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix File Anes 1988‐1992 Merged Senate File
    Version 03 Codebook ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ CODEBOOK APPENDIX FILE ANES 1988‐1992 MERGED SENATE FILE USER NOTE: Much of his file has been converted to electronic format via OCR scanning. As a result, the user is advised that some errors in character recognition may have resulted within the text. MASTER CODES: The following master codes follow in this order: PARTY‐CANDIDATE MASTER CODE CAMPAIGN ISSUES MASTER CODES CONGRESSIONAL LEADERSHIP CODE ELECTIVE OFFICE CODE RELIGIOUS PREFERENCE MASTER CODE SENATOR NAMES CODES CAMPAIGN MANAGERS AND POLLSTERS CAMPAIGN CONTENT CODES HOUSE CANDIDATES CANDIDATE CODES >> VII. MASTER CODES ‐ Survey Variables >> VII.A. Party/Candidate ('Likes/Dislikes') ? PARTY‐CANDIDATE MASTER CODE PARTY ONLY ‐‐ PEOPLE WITHIN PARTY 0001 Johnson 0002 Kennedy, John; JFK 0003 Kennedy, Robert; RFK 0004 Kennedy, Edward; "Ted" 0005 Kennedy, NA which 0006 Truman 0007 Roosevelt; "FDR" 0008 McGovern 0009 Carter 0010 Mondale 0011 McCarthy, Eugene 0012 Humphrey 0013 Muskie 0014 Dukakis, Michael 0015 Wallace 0016 Jackson, Jesse 0017 Clinton, Bill 0031 Eisenhower; Ike 0032 Nixon 0034 Rockefeller 0035 Reagan 0036 Ford 0037 Bush 0038 Connally 0039 Kissinger 0040 McCarthy, Joseph 0041 Buchanan, Pat 0051 Other national party figures (Senators, Congressman, etc.) 0052 Local party figures (city, state, etc.) 0053 Good/Young/Experienced leaders; like whole ticket 0054 Bad/Old/Inexperienced leaders; dislike whole ticket 0055 Reference to vice‐presidential candidate ? Make 0097 Other people within party reasons Card PARTY ONLY ‐‐ PARTY CHARACTERISTICS 0101 Traditional Democratic voter: always been a Democrat; just a Democrat; never been a Republican; just couldn't vote Republican 0102 Traditional Republican voter: always been a Republican; just a Republican; never been a Democrat; just couldn't vote Democratic 0111 Positive, personal, affective terms applied to party‐‐good/nice people; patriotic; etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Democrats Republicans 52 48
    V15, N42 Thursday, July 22, 2010 Battle for House takes shape Parties test outlier races, economy as Daniels engages By BRIAN A. HOWEY RISING SUN - The ad for Attica Clerk- Treauser Sharon Negele blipped up on Terre !"#$%&"'(&)"*"+%$$%&,-&."/$&0%%12&3$&4/&$5%&[7/$& Attica Clerk-Treasurer tangible electronic signal in the coming House Sharon Negele (left) Wars - the battle for the lower chamber which is challenging House will play a huge role in creating the reappor- Majority Caucus Chair- tioned Congressional and legislative maps for man Dale Grubb (top) the coming decade. in a race HPI viewed as “She’s more than just our neighbor,” a lower tier challenge. the voiceover states as it shows Negele greet- The HRCC is running ing neighbors, standing in front of an Attica TV to drive her name ID [7%&$7#81&"'(&09714':&4'&5%7&8"'(+&*"8$97+2& up, hoping the race be- “She’s someone we can count on. Instead of comes competitive if the a career politician, let’s send a trusted friend economy in languishing to represent us. After 22 years, isn’t it time to in the fall and a wave have a new voice for west central Indiana?” develops. (HPI Photo by & ;*&$5%&<=&[>%&97&/9&?%@#A.48"'&85". - A. Walker Shaw) Continued on page 3 How does Brad win? By DAVE KITCHELL LOGANSPORT - What is it exactly that a recent poll on the Indiana Senate race is expected to tell us? The Rasmussen poll, which trends Republican, tells us former Sen. Dan UThis election is going to be a Coats, a Republican who has not referendum on the borrowing, served in Congress in more than a decade, has a 51-30 lead over Brad spending, bailouts and take- Ellsworth, a Democrat who has been there for the past four.
    [Show full text]
  • The Long Red Thread How Democratic Dominance Gave Way to Republican Advantage in Us House of Representatives Elections, 1964
    THE LONG RED THREAD HOW DEMOCRATIC DOMINANCE GAVE WAY TO REPUBLICAN ADVANTAGE IN U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ELECTIONS, 1964-2018 by Kyle Kondik A thesis submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Baltimore, Maryland September 2019 © 2019 Kyle Kondik All Rights Reserved Abstract This history of U.S. House elections from 1964-2018 examines how Democratic dominance in the House prior to 1994 gave way to a Republican advantage in the years following the GOP takeover. Nationalization, partisan realignment, and the reapportionment and redistricting of House seats all contributed to a House where Republicans do not necessarily always dominate, but in which they have had an edge more often than not. This work explores each House election cycle in the time period covered and also surveys academic and journalistic literature to identify key trends and takeaways from more than a half-century of U.S. House election results in the one person, one vote era. Advisor: Dorothea Wolfson Readers: Douglas Harris, Matt Laslo ii Table of Contents Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………....ii List of Tables……………………………………………………………………………..iv List of Figures……………………………………………………………………………..v Introduction: From Dark Blue to Light Red………………………………………………1 Data, Definitions, and Methodology………………………………………………………9 Chapter One: The Partisan Consequences of the Reapportionment Revolution in the United States House of Representatives, 1964-1974…………………………...…12 Chapter 2: The Roots of the Republican Revolution:
    [Show full text]
  • 106Th Congpicdir New York
    NEW YORK Sen. Daniel P. Moynihan Sen. Charles E. Schumer of Oneonta of Brooklyn Democrat—Jan. 3, 1977 Democrat—Jan. 6, 1999 Michael Forbes Rick A. Lazio of Quogue (1st District) of Brightwaters (2d District) Republican—3d term Republican—4th term 90 NEW YORK Peter T. King Carolyn McCarthy of Seaford (3d District) of Mineola (4th District) Republican—4th term Democrat—2d term Gary L. Ackerman Gregory Meeks of Queens (5th District) of Far Rockaway (6th District) Democrat—9th term Democrat—1st term 91 NEW YORK Joseph Crowley Jerrold Nadler of Queens (7th District) of New York City (8th District) Democrat—1st term Democrat—5th term Anthony Weiner Edolphus Towns of Brooklyn (9th District) of Brooklyn (10th District) Democrat—1st term Democrat—9th term 92 NEW YORK Major R. Owens Nydia M. Velázquez of Brooklyn (11th District) of Brooklyn (12th District) Democrat—9th term Democrat—4th term Vito Fossella Carolyn B. Maloney of Staten Island (13th District) of New York City (14th District) Republican—1st term Democrat—4th term 93 NEW YORK Charles B. Rangel José E. Serrano of New York City (15th District) of Bronx (16th District) Democrat—15th term Democrat—6th term Eliot L. Engel Nita M. Lowey of Bronx (17th District) of Harrison (18th District) Democrat—6th term Democrat—6th term 94 NEW YORK Sue Kelly Benjamin A. Gilman of Katonah (19th District) of Middletown (20th District) Republican—3d term Republican—14th term Michael R. McNulty John Sweeney of Green Island (21st District) of Schaghticoke (22d District) Democrat—6th term Republican—1st term 95 NEW YORK Sherwood L.
    [Show full text]
  • White House Staffs: a Study
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Supervised Undergraduate Student Research Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects and Creative Work 5-1997 White House Staffs: A Study Eric Jackson Stansell University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj Recommended Citation Stansell, Eric Jackson, "White House Staffs: A Study" (1997). Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj/241 This is brought to you for free and open access by the Supervised Undergraduate Student Research and Creative Work at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UNIVERSITY HONORS PROGRAM SENIOR PROJECT - APPROVAL Name: _Er~ __ ~t~~~g.Jl ____________________________________ _ College: J:..t"j.§_~ __~=i.~~~,=-~___ Department: _Cc:.ti~:a-t:;..-_~~_~~l~!:"~ __ - Faculty Mentor: __Q~!.. ___ M~~69&-1 ___ f~j"k%~.r~ld _________________ _ PROJECT TITLE: __~_\i.hik_H<?.~&_~t",-{:f~~ __ ~__ ~jM-/_: ________ _ I have reviewed this completed senior honors thesis with this student and certify that it is a project commensurate with honors level undergraduate research in this field. Signed: ~~#_~::t~~ Faculty Mentor ______________ , Date: ~/l7.t-~EL ______ --- Comments (Optional): "White House Staffs: A Study" by Eric Stansell August 11, 1997 "White House StatTs: A Study" by Eric Stansell Abstract In its current form, the modem presidency consists of much more than just a single individual elected to serve as the head of government.
    [Show full text]
  • January 20,1921
    i BELFAST, MAINE, THURSDAY, JANUARY 20. 1921._ FJyE CENTS James c. Kouertson and family moved ! ot Belfast. , The W. C. T. U. will meet Friday af- Aid Hospital Aid: The first baptist News .Saturday from the Howard house on up- The Waldo County Hospital Church. Rev. ternoon with Miss Eda Woodbury. For Ueorge C. per Main street to Daniel I. Robertson’s the year ending Dec. 30, 1920. Sauer, pastor; residence, 13 PERSONAL. of theS. of V. Aux- his brother’s on Salmond The Universalist 1 meeting of the Waldo Cash received and amount in Uedar; telephone, 123-11. The services :nS Circle house, street. League will meet The annual was held at of worship 10.45 and sale and supper March Herbert F. Hanson and family have moved with Mrs. Arthur Morse Friday at 2 30 County Hospital Aid the bank Dec. 1919 33594.55 7.30. Bible school Mrs. Jessie S. Pattee is a few fti5', h_,a at 12 spending from the P. D H. Carter house on p. m. of Mrs. Cecil Clay last Friday sf- Amount for o’clock. Christian Endeavor at with relatives in Hall. Miller * home expended repairs, days Portland. Korial 6.30 at street to the Howard house. ternoon with a tfood attendance.^ The refurnishing and supplies 1397.12 Thursday 7.30 the raid-week ^ Blaisdell has presented Keep the date, Jan. 27th, of the fire- service. Ben J. Parker is in where n \y. following officers were elected: President, Total cash on hand 2197.42 Pastor’s theme for Sunday Auburn, ha a ex- A still alarm was in at 6.30 men’s ball in mind.
    [Show full text]
  • OCTOBER 6, 2020 WASHINGTON, DC @Congressfdn #Democracyawards Table of Contents
    AWARDS CELEBRATION OCTOBER 6, 2020 WASHINGTON, DC www.CongressFoundation.org @CongressFdn #DemocracyAwards Table of Contents 3 About the Congressional Management Foundation 3 Special Thanks 4 About the Democracy Awards 5 Virtual Awards Ceremony 6 Democracy Awards for Constituent Service 7 Democracy Awards for Innovation and Modernization 8 Democracy Awards for “Life in Congress” Workplace Environment 9 Democracy Awards for Transparency and Accountability 10 Finalists for the Democracy Awards 14 Democracy Awards for Lifetime Achievement 18 Staff Finalists for Lifetime Achievement 21 Selection Committee Biographies 24 Thank You to Our Generous Supporters 2 • CongressFoundation.org • @CongressFdn • #DemocracyAwards About the Congressional Management Foundation The Congressional Management Foundation (CMF) is a 501(c)(3) QUICK FACTS nonpartisan nonprofit whose mission is to build trust and effectiveness in Congress. • More than 1,100 staff from more than 300 congressional We do this by enhancing the performance of the institution, offices participate in the training legislators and their staffs through research-based education programs CMF conducts annually. and training, and by strengthening the bridge and understanding between Congress and the People it serves. • Since 2014 CMF has conducted 500 educational sessions with Since 1977, CMF has worked internally with Member, committee, more than 90,000 citizens on leadership, and institutional offices in the House and Senate to effectively communicating with identify and disseminate best practices for management, workplace Congress. environment, communications, and constituent services. • Since 2000, CMF has conducted CMF also is the leading researcher and trainer on citizen more than 500 strategic planning engagement, educating thousands of individuals and facilitating or other consulting projects with better understanding, relationships, and communications with Members of Congress and their staffs.
    [Show full text]
  • Results-Summary-Gen06 (PDF)
    SUMMARY REPORT FRANKLIN COUNTY OHIO OFFICIAL RESULTS GENERAL ELECTION NOVEMBER 7, 2006 RUN DATE:11/29/06 08:45 AM REPORT-EL45 PAGE 001 VOTES PERCENT VOTES PERCENT PRECINCTS COUNTED (OF 842). 842 100.00 Representative to Congress 12TH CONG DIST REGISTERED VOTERS - TOTAL . 766,652 (Vote For Not More Than ) 1 BALLOTS CAST - TOTAL. 385,863 (WITH 367 OF 367 PRECINCTS COUNTED) VOTER TURNOUT - TOTAL . 50.33 BOB SHAMANSKY (DEM) . 108,746 42.70 PAT TIBERI (REP) . 145,943 57.30 Governor and Lieutenant Governor (Vote For Not More Than ) 1 (WITH 835 OF 835 PRECINCTS COUNTED) Representative to Congress 15TH CONG DIST J. KENNETH BLACKWELL (REP). 122,601 32.80 (Vote For Not More Than ) 1 ROBERT FITRAKIS . 3,703 .99 (WITH 434 OF 434 PRECINCTS COUNTED) BILL PEIRCE. 5,382 1.44 MARY JO KILROY (DEM). 109,659 49.58 TED STRICKLAND (DEM). 241,536 64.62 DEBORAH PRYCE (REP) . 110,714 50.06 WRITE-IN. 553 .15 WRITE-IN. 783 .35 Attorney General State Senator 03RD OH SEN DIST (Vote For Not More Than ) 1 (Vote For Not More Than ) 1 (WITH 835 OF 835 PRECINCTS COUNTED) (WITH 316 OF 316 PRECINCTS COUNTED) MARC DANN (DEM) . 187,191 51.07 DAVID GOODMAN (REP) . 71,874 54.12 BETTY MONTGOMERY (REP) . 179,370 48.93 EMILY KREIDER (DEM) . 60,927 45.88 Auditor of State State Senator 15TH OH SEN DIST (Vote For Not More Than ) 1 (Vote For Not More Than ) 1 (WITH 835 OF 835 PRECINCTS COUNTED) (WITH 251 OF 251 PRECINCTS COUNTED) BARBARA SYKES (DEM) .
    [Show full text]
  • Bob Dold, Republican Party Animal Bob Dold
    In This Issue: Obamacare.................... 7 Bob Dold, Republican Party Animal Bob Dold ........................ 1 Democratic Debate ..... 8 Women in Politics ......... 1 ArtWauk ........................ 9 If you listen closely to what Dold & Letter to Rand Paul ..... 10 Freedom Caucus .......... 5 Labor Town Hall.......... 11 he says to the people of the Econ 101......................... 6 Help Wanted ............... 11 10th District, you’ll notice For information or to volunteer, email us at something odd: incumbent [email protected], call us at 847- Congressman Bob Dold never 266-VOTE (8683), or write to Hon. Lauren mentions he’s a Republican. Beth Gash, Founding Chair, Tenth Dems, P.O. Box 523, Deerfield, IL 60015. Please He likes to portray himself visit our website at www.tenthdems.org as a suburban pest control and like us on Facebook and Twitter. business owner who woke L. to r., Bob Dold and his mentors, Bob Dole, Dan Quayle, and Dan Burton Editor: Barbara Altman up one day and decided to run for Congress. linking riots in Los Angeles to a fictional single Editorial Staff: Joan Attenberg, He’d have you believe he simply flipped a coin mother on TV, Murphy Brown. Lauren Beth Gash, Eric Herman, to decide which ticket to be on. Adrienne Kirshbaum, Laurence D. Schiller, Next, Dold worked for Republican Bob Dole’s Steve Sheffey, Allan Sperling In fact, Dold is a lifelong, partisan Republican. presidential campaign against Bill Clinton. Contributors: Barbara Altman, Ron Altman, Dole thought the best way to head into the 21st Roger Baron, Steven Gan, Eric Herman, From 1991 until President Clinton’s inauguration century was a return to Reaganomics.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix File 1982 Merged Methods File
    Page 1 of 145 CODEBOOK APPENDIX FILE 1982 MERGED METHODS FILE USER NOTE: This file has been converted to electronic format via OCR scanning. As as result, the user is advised that some errors in character recognition may have resulted within the text. >> ABOUT THE EXPRESSIONS IN THE 1982 QUESTIONNAIRE (NAME Y X, Y. OR Z) The 1982 tIME sERIES questionnaire made provisions to have interviewers fill in district/state candidate names in blank slots like the one depicted above. A comprehensive list of HOUSE, SENATE and GOVERNOR candidate and incumbent names was prepared for each of the 173 districts in the sample and the interviewers used the lists to pre-edit names where appropriate depending on the district of interview. These candidate lists are reproduced in the green pages section of this documentation. The (NAME #) expression will generally list more than one candidate number. For any given district, however, one of two possibilities will hold: 1) there will be one and only one name in the district candidate list qualifying for inclusion on the basis of the numbers listed in the expression; or 2) there will be no number in the district candidate list matching any of the numbers in the expression. An instance of no matching numbers arises for a question about the candidate challenging a district incumbent when, in fact, the incumbent is running unopposed. Interviewers were instructed to mark "NO INFO" those questions involving unmatched candidate numbers in the (NAME #) expression. In the candidate list, each candidate or incumbent is assigned a number or code. Numbers beginning with 1 (11-19) are for the Senate, numbers beginning with 3 (31-39) are for the House of Representatives, and numbers beginning with 5 (51-58) are for governors.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 116 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 116 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 165 WASHINGTON, WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 11, 2019 No. 198 Senate The Senate met at 9:30 a.m. and was appoint the Honorable MARSHA BLACKBURN, a sidered made and laid upon the table called to order by the Honorable MAR- Senator from the State of Tennessee, to per- and the President be immediately noti- SHA BLACKBURN, a Senator from the form the duties of the Chair. fied of the Senate’s action; further, State of Tennessee. CHUCK GRASSLEY, that following the disposition of the President pro tempore. f VanDyke nomination and notwith- Mrs. BLACKBURN thereupon as- standing the provisions of rule XXII, PRAYER sumed the Chair as Acting President the Senate vote on the motions to in- pro tempore. The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, of- voke cloture on the Sullivan, Hahn, fered the following prayer: f and Skipwith nominations in the order Let us pray. RESERVATION OF LEADER TIME listed; finally, that if cloture is in- Almighty God, we are reminded at voked on the Sullivan, Hahn, and The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tem- this time of year of the greatness of Skipwith nominations, the confirma- pore. Under the previous order, the Your gift to us in sending Your Son. tion votes occur at a time to be deter- leadership time is reserved. Use us as instruments for His glory. mined by the majority leader, in con- Because of our faith in You, make us f sultation with the Democratic leader, bold as lions in these turbulent times.
    [Show full text]