A Comprehensive Vision of Ukraine's Participation in the Implementation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Comprehensive Vision of Ukraine's Participation in the Implementation A Comprehensive Vision of Ukraine's Participation in the Implementation of the EU Strategy for the Danube Region A Comprehensive Vision of Ukraine's Participation in the Implementation of the EU Strategy for the Danube Region A COMPREHENSIVE VISION OF UKRAINE'S PARTICIPATION IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE EU STRATEGY FOR THE DANUBE REGION Edited by Igor Studennikov Odessa 2015 1 A Comprehensive Vision of Ukraine's Participation in the Implementation of the EU Strategy for the Danube Region A Comprehensive Vision of Ukraine's Participation in the Implementation of the EU Strategy for the Danube Region A Comprehensive Vision of Ukraine's Participation in the Implementation of the EU Strategy for the Danube Region Authors: Iulian ANDRIESH, Victor BONDARUK, Zynoviy BROYDE, Sergiy CHAPLYGIN, Oleg DIAKOV, Artem FILIPENKO, Irina GALINA, Dmytro IVANENKO, Mykhailo KAPSHTYK, Andriy KONIASHYN, Maria KOVALIV, Yaroslav KYRPUSHKO, Oleg LUKSHA, Yuriy MELNIK, Leonid PLOTNYTSKYI, Oleg RUBEL, Igor STUDENNIKOV, Eugen SOKOLOV, Tatiana TARASENKO, Gabriela TOVT, Svitlana VINOKUROVA, Natalia ZAKORCHEVNA, Mykhailo ZHMUD Edited by: Igor STUDENNIKOV Assistants: Irina KHYZHNIAK, Leonid PLOTNYTSKYI Copyright Statement This publication is an output from the project «Strengthening Civil Society Involvement in Assisting the Government with the Implementation of the EU Strategy for the Danube Region» with the financial support from the European Commission through the Neighbourhood Civil Society Facility 2011. The views expressed are not necessarily those of the European Commission. The copyright of this material is held by the Centre for Regional Studies. The material can be freely reproduced for non-commercial purposes but the project “Strengthening Civil Society Involvement in Assisting the Government with the Implementation of the EU Strategy for the Danube Region” and its funding by the European Commission through Neighbourhood Civil Society Facility 2011 must be acknowledged. Reproduction of this material with commercial purposes is prohibited. Any organisation wishing to reproduce the material should contact the Centre for Regional Studies at [email protected] © Centre for Regional Studies, Odessa, 2015 2 A Comprehensive Vision of Ukraine's Participation in the Implementation of the EU Strategy for the Danube Region A Comprehensive Vision of Ukraine's Participation in the Implementation of the EU Strategy for the Danube Region CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................................................. 4 SWOT-analysis of the Ukrainian part of the Danube region ....................................... 8 Spatial planning as a tool for the development of the Ukrainian part of the Danube Region: problems, approaches and opportunities ...................................................... 22 Challenges and opportunities for inland navigation and port infrastructure development in the context of the EU Strategy for the Danube Region .................... 30 Renewable energy deployment in the Ukrainian part of the Danube Region ............. 40 Preserving historical and cultural heritage and promoting tourism in the Ukrainian part of the Danube Region ......................................................................................... 48 Sustainable use and integrated management of natural resources ........................... 57 Adaptation to the effects of climate change and natural risk management in the Ukrainian part of the Danube Region ......................................................................... 64 Increasing the competitiveness of the Ukrainian part of the Danube Region: organic farming ....................................................................................................................... 67 Scheme proposed for coordination of Ukraine’s participation in the implementation of the EU Strategy for the Danube Region ................................................................. 81 3 A Comprehensive Vision of Ukraine's Participation in the Implementation of the EU Strategy for the Danube Region A Comprehensive Vision of Ukraine's Participation in the Implementation of the EU Strategy for the Danube Region INTRODUCTION The EU Strategy for the Danube Region (EUSDR) is a macro-regional strategy adopted by the European Commission in December 2010 and endorsed by the European Council in 2011. The Strategy was jointly developed by the Commission, together with the Danube Region countries and stakeholders, in order to address common challenges together. The Strategy seeks to create synergies and coordination between existing policies and initiatives taking place across the Danube Region. The EUSDR consist of two key documents – the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions and the Action Plan. The Danube Strategy includes 4 pillars and 11 priority areas of the Danube Region’s development. PILLAR PRIORITY AREA 1. To improve mobility and multimodality 2. To encourage more sustainable energy А) Connecting the Danube Region 3. To promote culture and tourism, people to people contacts 4. To restore and maintain the quality of waters B) Protecting the Environment in the 5. To manage environmental risks Danube Region 6. To preserve biodiversity, landscapes and the quality of air and soil 7. To develop the Knowledge Society through re- search, education and information technologies C) Building Prosperity in the Danube Re- gion 8. To support the competitiveness of enterprises, in- cluding cluster development 9. To invest in people and skills 10. To set up institutional capacity and cooperation D) Strengthening the Danube Region 11. To work together to promote security and tackle or- ganised and serious crime The EUSDR Coordination Structure: • The European Commission, as the executive of the EU, prepared the Strategy in 2010 in consultation with all partner countries. The Commission´s Directorate General for Regional Policy helps to implement the Strategy by facilitating and supporting actions of the participating countries. They also coordinate the Strategy at the policy level, assisted by a High Level Group. • The High Level Group (HLG) on macro-regional strategies is made up of official representatives from all EU Member States. It assists the Commission in the policy 4 A Comprehensive Vision of Ukraine's Participation in the Implementation of the EU Strategy for the Danube Region A Comprehensive Vision of Ukraine's Participation in the Implementation of the EU Strategy for the Danube Region coordination of the Strategy. The Commission consults the HLG for modifications to the Strategy and the action plan, as well as for reports and monitoring. The HLG also addresses policy orientation and prioritisation. • The Priority Area Coordinators (PACs) ensure the implementation of the Action Plan defined for the Priority Area by agreeing on planning, with targets, indicators and timetables, and by making sure there is effective cooperation between project promoters, programmes and funding sources. They also provide technical assistance and advice. The coordinators work in consultation with the Commission, and relevant EU agencies and national/regional bodies. • The National Coordinators (NCs) coordinate and keep an overview of the participation of their country in the implementation of the EUSDR including all 11 Priority Areas. The role of the NC is to promote the Strategy and inform relevant stakeholders on the national level of key developments. NCPs also assist the European Commission in its facilitation role. • The Danube Strategy Point (DSP) has been established in 2015 to improve the implementation process of the Strategy, supporting the Commission in its coordination tasks of the EUSDR.The DSP is supporting exchange among Priority Area Coordinators and National Coordinators in their tasks and promoting the Strategy predominantly at the European level. The DSP also administers funds originating from the EU institutions in the framework of Technical Assistance for the Priority Areas in the EUSDR for the years 2015-2016. THE UKRAINIAN PART OF THE DANUBE REGION Ukraine, a non-EU country involved in the EU Danube Strategy process, shares significant part of the Danube-Carpathian Region. The Ukrainian part of the Danube Region is formed by four oblasts (regions) – Odessa Oblast, Chernivetska Oblast, Ivano-Frankivska Oblast and Zakarpatska Oblast – occupying 68,100 sq km with a population of 5.9 million. In terms of a river basin approach and according to the ICPDR methodology, the Ukrainian part of the Danube Region is located in the sub-basins of the Danube Delta, the Prut and the Siret, and the Tisza River. A river basin management approach has become a basic methodological tool for defining the Ukrainian part of the Danube Region and the Danube Region on the whole. UKRAINE’S INVOLVEMENT IN THE EUSDR IMPLEMENTATION: STATE OF AFFAIRS Since the beginning of the Danube Strategy process, at the official level Ukraine has never been an active player demonstrating more or less clear understanding of its own expectations from the EUSDR. Ukraine doesn’t coordinate any priority area of the Danube Strategy. The only interest has been expressed by Ukraine in terms of the EUSDR is Priority Area 1-A “Mobility – Waterways”*1. Ukraine’s governmental level participation in Danube Strategy’s events has also been limited. As distinct from other Danube Region’s countries, Ukraine has never
Recommended publications
  • Природнi Лiси Українських Карпат Natural Forests Of
    Фонд Всесвітній фонд Міхаеля Зуккова природи Michael Succow World Wide Fund Foundation for Nature ПрироднI лIси Українських карПат NATURAL FORESTS OF UKRAINIAN CARPATHIANS карти і атласи львів-2018 УДК 911.2:581.9(477:292.452) Природні ліси Українських Карпат / Ред. А. Смалійчук та У. Гребенер – Львів: Карти і Атласи, 2018. – 104 с. A. Smaliychuk & U. Gräbener (Eds) 2018. Natural forests of Ukrainian Carpathians. Carty i Atlasy, Lviv. 104 p. (in Ukrainian). Автори текстів: Улі Гребенер, Ганс Дітер Кнапп, Богдан Проць, Анатолій Смалійчук, Роман Волосянчук. Автори фотографій: Михайло Богомаз, Гартмут Мюллер, Маттіас Шікгофер, Володимир Савчин, Андрій Юзик, Олександр Ярош, Роман Лазарович, Анатолій Смалійчук, Василь Покиньчереда. Детальніше див. на сторінці 103. Карти: Анатолій Смалійчук Дизайн: Ігор Дикий Редактори: Анатолій Смалійчук, Улі Гребенер Наукові рецензенти: проф., д-р Ганс Дітер Кнапп, к.с.-г.н., доц. Микола Чернявський, к.б.н., с.н.с. Богдан Проць Text authors: Uli Gräbener, Hans Dieter Knapp, Bohdan Prots, Anatoliy Smaliychuk, Roman Volosyanchuk. Picture authors: Mykhailo Bogomaz, Hartmut Müller, Matthias Schickhofer, Volodymyr Savchyn, Andriy Yuzyk, Oleksandr Yarosh, Roman Lazarovich, Anatoliy Smaliychuk, Vasyl Pokynchereda. For more details see page 103. Maps: Anatoliy Smaliychuk Design: Ihor Dykyi Editors: Anatoliy Smaliychuk, Uli Gräbener Scientific eviewr ers: Prof. Dr. Hans Dieter Knapp, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Mykola Chernyavskyi, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Bohdan Prots Фінансова підтримка проекту здійснюється Федеральним міністерством навколишнього се- редовища, охорони природи та безпеки ядерних реакторів (BMU) в рамках Програми консуль- таційної допомоги для охорони навколишнього середовища (AAP) в країнах Центральної та Східної Європи, Кавказу та Центральної Азії, а також в інших країнах, розташованих по сусідству з Європейським Союзом.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing the GIS-Based Maps of the Geomorphological and Phytogeographical Division of the Ukrainian Carpathians for Routine Use in Biogeography
    Biogeographia – The Journal of Integrative Biogeography 36 (2021): a009 https://doi.org/10.21426/B636052326 Developing the GIS-based maps of the geomorphological and phytogeographical division of the Ukrainian Carpathians for routine use in biogeography ANDRIY NOVIKOV Department of Biosystematics and Evolution of the State Natural History Museum of the NAS of Ukraine, Teatralna str. 18, 79008 Lviv (Ukraine) email: [email protected] Keywords: biogeography, mesoregional division, shapefile, Ukrainian Carpathians. SUMMARY The paper introduces GIS-based maps of the geomorphological and phytogeographical division of the Ukrainian Carpathians (a part of Eastern Carpathian Mts.), which were developed for routine use in biogeography and based on the consolidation of the existing publications. The map of the geomorphological division includes 57 OGUs (operational geographic units), and the map of the phytogeographical division – 18 OGUs of the lowest rank. Geomorphological units are supported with available synonyms, which should help in work with different topic-related Ukrainian publications. Both maps follow strict hierarchical classification and are briefly discussed. INTRODUCTION Tsys (1962, 1968) published the first The Ukrainian Carpathians (UC) is part of the complete geomorphologic division of the UC. Eastern Carpathian mountain province Besides five mountainous regions, this division (Kondracki 1989), artificially delimited by the also included adjacent foothills and lowlands western border of Ukraine and covering about (Ciscarpathia and Transcarpathia) and 24,000 km2. In general, these are not high comprised 36 districts. Such regionalization of mountains – only seven peaks of the UC the UC was further developed by many slightly exceed 2000 m of elevation, and all Ukrainian scientists (Herenchuk 1968, these peaks, including the highest point of Marynych et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Socio – Economic Analysis of the Programme Area
    Socio – economic analysis of the programme area INTERREG NEXT POLAND – BELARUS – UKRAINE 2021 -2027 1 | Table of Contents 1. Summary .............................................................................................................................................4 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................7 Diagnosis of the support area ....................................................................................................8 3.1. General information on the support area .......................................................................8 3.2. Population ............................................................................................................................... 13 3.2.1. Density of population ................................................................................................. 13 3.2.2. Population growth ....................................................................................................... 14 3.2.3 Population structure .................................................................................................... 15 3.2.4 Changes in population ............................................................................................... 17 3.2.5 Migration ......................................................................................................................... 20 3.2.6 Demographic trends ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Quantitative Records of Larvae of Ephemeroptera, Odonata and Plecoptera from the Zakarpats’Ka Region, Ukraine (2004, 2006)
    Godunko_ukran_mennyisegi.qxd 2009.01.12. 14:02 Page 135 FOLIA HISTORICO NATURALIA MUSEI MATRAENSIS 2008 32: 135–147 Quantitative records of larvae of Ephemeroptera, Odonata and Plecoptera from the Zakarpats’ka Region, Ukraine (2004, 2006) TIBOR KOVÁCS, ROMAN J. GODUNKO, PÉTER JUHÁSZ, BÉLA KISS & ZOLTÁN MÜLLER ABSTRACT: The first part of this paper (Tables 1-2) provides data on 38 Ephemeroptera, 3 Odonata and 19 Plecoptera taxa from the Zakarpats’ka Region, Ukraine. The species Taeniopteryx auberti Kis & Sowa, 1964 and T. schoenemundi (Mertens, 1923) are recorded in the first time from Ukraine. The following species are new to Zakarpats’ka Region and Tysa River: Cloeon dipterum (Linnaeus, 1761), Kageronia fuscogrisea (Retzius, 1783) (Borzhava), Isogenus nubecula Newman, 1833 (Rika, Teresva, Tysa). The second part (Tables 3-5) is a still unpublished data list of GODUNKO & KOVÁCS (2008). Introduction This paper is divided into two parts. The first part (Tables 1-2) contains results of a quanti- tative sampling focused on the Tysa and its inflows (06.05.2004-07.05.2004, 29.06.2004- 30.06.2004, 19.10.2004-20.10.2004). The water courses investigated are Chorna Tysa, Bila Tysa, Tysa (six sampling spots), Shopurka, Apshytsia, Teresva, Tereblia, Rika, Borzhava. Faunistic results of this work were published by KOVÁCS & GODUNKO (2008). Composit type samples were taken using the “kick and sweep” method. Three semiquan- titative samples were taken from five meter long sections at each sampling spot. This meant the sampling of a 3.75 m2 (3 × 1.25 m2) area at each site. The three separately processed sam- ples represented characteristic habitat-types of the given river-section.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology-Dnu-Dp.Ua Doi: 10.15421/112111
    ISSN 2617-2909 (print) Journal of Geology, ISSN 2617-2119 (online) Geography and Journ. Geol. Geograph. Geoecology Geology, 30(1), 122–132. Journal home page: geology-dnu-dp.ua doi: 10.15421/112111 S.V. Melnychenko, H. I. Mykhaylichenko, Y. B. Zabaldina, S. S. Kravtsov, S. S. Skakovska Journ. Geol. Geograph. Geoecology, 30(1), 122–132. The protected area as a tourism eco-brand Svitlana V. Melnychenko1, Hanna I. Mykhaylichenko1, Yuliia B. Zabaldina1, Sergiy S. Kravtsov1, Svitlana S. Skakovska2 1Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics, Ukraine, Kyiv, [email protected] 2National University of Water and Environmental Engineering, Ukraine Received: 17.12.2020 Abstract. Branding of the protected area plays an important role in the process of forming Received in revised form: 14.01.2021 its attractiveness for the currently growing target market, focused on the consumption of Accepted: 21.01.2021 environmental friendliness as an unconditional value. The results of literature review show that when the object of branding is a national nature park or any other nature protected object, intangible elements of the brand (affirmative opinions, beliefs and associations) must be based on the principle of eco-friendliness, and the tangible elements (logo, colours, design, semantic and visual effects) reflect this primary value. This is the so-called eco-brand which provides the ecological prerogative of the positioning object. The aim of this paper is to analyze the tangible and intangible components of Ukrainian national nature parks brands, their current market positioning, as well as the development of proposals for eco-brand formation of the national parks.
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine on the Implementation of the Convention on Biological Diversity
    Sixth National Report of Ukraine on the Implementation of the Convention on Biological Diversity English version December, 2018 Kyiv – 2018 Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 4 Acknowledgements........................................................................................................................ 4 Abbreviations ................................................................................................................................ 5 Section I. Information on the targets being pursued at the national level .................................. 7 National Target 1 (NT1). Increasing the level of public environmental consciousness ............................... 7 National Target 2 (NT 2). Improving the environmental situation and increasing the level of environmental security ......................................................................................................................... 8 National Target 3 (NT 3). Attaining the environmental conditions safe for human health ..........................10 National Target 4 (NT 4). Integrating the environmental policy and improving the integrated environmental management system ......................................................................................................... 11 National Target 5 (NT 5). Halting the loss of biological and landscape diversity and establishing the ecological network .........................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • Viva Xpress Logistics (Uk)
    VIVA XPRESS LOGISTICS (UK) Tel : +44 1753 210 700 World Xpress Centre, Galleymead Road Fax : +44 1753 210 709 SL3 0EN Colnbrook, Berkshire E-mail : [email protected] UNITED KINGDOM Web : www.vxlnet.co.uk Selection ZONE FULL REPORT Filter : Sort : Group : Code Zone Description ZIP CODES From To Agent UA UAAOD00 UA-Ukraine AOD - 4 days POLISKE 07000 - 07004 VILCHA 07011 - 07012 RADYNKA 07024 - 07024 RAHIVKA 07033 - 07033 ZELENA POLIANA 07035 - 07035 MAKSYMOVYCHI 07040 - 07040 MLACHIVKA 07041 - 07041 HORODESCHYNA 07053 - 07053 KRASIATYCHI 07053 - 07053 SLAVUTYCH 07100 - 07199 IVANKIV 07200 - 07204 MUSIIKY 07211 - 07211 DYTIATKY 07220 - 07220 STRAKHOLISSIA 07225 - 07225 OLYZARIVKA 07231 - 07231 KROPYVNIA 07234 - 07234 ORANE 07250 - 07250 VYSHGOROD 07300 - 07304 VYSHHOROD 07300 - 07304 RUDNIA DYMERSKA 07312 - 07312 KATIUZHANKA 07313 - 07313 TOLOKUN 07323 - 07323 DYMER 07330 - 07331 KOZAROVYCHI 07332 - 07332 HLIBOVKA 07333 - 07333 LYTVYNIVKA 07334 - 07334 ZHUKYN 07341 - 07341 PIRNOVE 07342 - 07342 TARASIVSCHYNA 07350 - 07350 HAVRYLIVKA 07350 - 07350 RAKIVKA 07351 - 07351 SYNIAK 07351 - 07351 LIUTIZH 07352 - 07352 NYZHCHA DUBECHNIA 07361 - 07361 OSESCHYNA 07363 - 07363 KHOTIANIVKA 07363 - 07363 PEREMOGA 07402 - 07402 SKYBYN 07407 - 07407 DIMYTROVE 07408 - 07408 LITKY 07411 - 07411 ROZHNY 07412 - 07412 PUKHIVKA 07413 - 07413 ZAZYMIA 07415 - 07415 POHREBY 07416 - 07416 KALYTA 07420 - 07422 MOKRETS 07425 - 07425 RUDNIA 07430 - 07430 BOBRYK 07431 - 07431 SHEVCHENKOVE 07434 - 07434 TARASIVKA 07441 - 07441 VELIKAYA DYMERKA 07442 - 07442 VELYKA
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 NEWSLETTER Issue # 1 Compressed
    ISSUE #1, 2020 ThereThere isis anotheranother UkraineUkraine storystory -- aa positive,positive, bipartisanbipartisan one.one. ThisThis oneone isis aboutabout youngyoung peoplepeople inin youngyoung nation,nation, strugglingstruggling toto breakbreak freefree itsits past...past... William B. Taylor, Jr. US Ambassador to Ukraine 2006-2009 and 2019-2020 years CANADA-UKRAINE PARLIAMENTARY PROGRAM ПАРЛЯМЕНТАРНА ПРОГРАМА КАНАДА-УКРАЇНА PROGRAMME PARLIAMENTAIRE CANADA-UKRAINE Canada’s Ambassador Roman Waschuk content: 1991 CANADA-UKRAINE PARLIAMENTARY POGRAM 2020 interview with On July 16, 1990, the Supreme Soviet of the Ukrainian SSR adopted the Declaration of Sovereignty, 3 Ihor Bardyn which declared that Parliament recognized the need to build the Ukrainian state based on the Rule of Law. Experience On August 24, 1991, the Ukrainian Parliament adopted the Declaration of Independence, which the of CUPP citizens of Ukraine endorsed in the referendum of December 1, 1991. Also, in 1991, Canadians celebrated 7 Generation the Centennial of Ukrainian group immigration to Canada. To mark the Centennial, Canadian organizations planned programs and projects to celebrate this milestone in Canada’s history. interview with The Chair of Ukrainian Studies Foundation of Toronto marked the Centennial by establishing in the Raynell Canadian Parliament, the Canada-Ukraine Parliamentary Program (CUPP) for university students from 14 Andreychuk Ukraine. CUPP gives Ukrainian students an opportunity to observe parliamentary democracy and Talented government and gain experience from which generations of Canadian, American and 18 Ukrainians West European students have benefited. Since 1991 over 1,000 university students have participated in the CUPP insight internship programs and the Model Ukraine Conferences at universities in The Rule Ottawa, Toronto, Washington USA, Oxford UK, Lviv and Kyiv.
    [Show full text]
  • Oszczypko ACTA LAYAUT
    DE DE GRUYTER Acta Geologica Polonica, Vol. 65 (2015), No. 3, pp. 319–344 OPEN DOI: 10.1515/agp-2015-0014 G Where was the Magura Ocean? NESTOR OSZCZYPKO1, ANDRZEJ ŚLĄCZKA1, MARTA OSZCZYPKO-CLOWES1 and BARBARA OLSZEWSKA2 1Jagiellonian University, Institute of Geological Sciences, Oleandry 2a, 30-063 Kraków, Poland; 2Polish Geological Institute, Carpathian Branch, Skrzatów 1, 31-560 Kraków, Poland; [email protected]; [email protected], [email protected] ABSTRACT: Oszczypko, N., Ślączka, A., Oszczypko-Clowes, A. and Olszewska, B. 2015. Where was the Magura Ocean. Acta Geologica Polonica, 65 (3), 319–344. Warszawa. In the Late Jurassic to Early Cretaceous palaeogeography of the Alpine Tethys the term Ocean is used for dif- ferent parts of these sedimentary areas: eg. Ligurian – Piedmont and Penninic, Magura, Pieniny, Valais and Ceahlau-Severins oceans. The Magura Ocean occupied the more northern position in the Alpine-Carpathian arc. During the Late Cretaceous–Paleogene tectono-sedimentary evolution the Magura Ocean was transformed into several (Magura, Dukla, Silesian, sub-Silesian and Skole) basins and intrabasinal source area ridges now in- corporated into the Outer Western Carpathians. Key words: Cenozoic, Outer Western Carpathians; Palaeogeography; Intrabasinal ridges; Basin development. INTRODUCTION time, terms such as the Magura Basin, Magura Nappe or the Magura Superunit are commonly used. Some- The term Magura Ocean, understood as the east- times, the Magura Ocean and the Magura Basin are ern prolongation of the Ligurian – Piedmont and Pen- used interchangeably, causing confusion of their con- ninic Ocean (eg. Puglisi 2009; 2014), is often used in cepts. Whereas the terms Magura Basin and Magura the palaeogeographic and palaeotectonic reconstruc- Nappe are sufficiently well-defined, the spatial and tions of the Outer Western Carpathians (Channell and temporal coverage of the Magura Ocean has not been Kozur 1997).
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Networks As a «Green» Growth Factor of the Region’S Economy
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Odessa National Economic University Cучасні проблеми регіонального розвитку Modern problems of regional development УДК 338:504; 332.122 ECOLOGICAL NETWORKS AS A «GREEN» GROWTH FACTOR OF THE REGION’S ECONOMY S.K.Harichkov, Ph.D., professor Odessa national polytechnic university, Odessa, Ukraine S.G.Nezdoyminov, Ph.D., senior lecturer Odessa national economic university, Odessa, Ukraine cological requirements for balanced regional development and tools for their E implementation are mostly associated with Харічков С.К., Нездоймінов С.Г. Екологічні мережі як фактор «зеленого» зростання економіки регіону. the policy, based on the total product life cycle in Визначено передумови та інституційні чинники order to reduce the negative ecological impact on the формування і розвитку регіональних екомереж, наукові environment and human health - from raw material підходи щодо розробки заходів екологізації сфери extraction to waste utilization. This is the basis of рекреації та туризму. Доведено, що одним з напрямів regional sustainable development policy, focused on реалізації розбудови екологічної мережі в регіонах України є збереження ландшафтного і біологічного різноманіття, replacing the unsustainable production and створення нових об’єктів природно-заповідного фонду. consumption models for eco-friendly ones. Thus, Обгрунтовано пропозиції щодо удосконалення управління announcing the decision about European integration, розвитком регіональної екологічної
    [Show full text]
  • Faunistical Records of Larvae of Ephemeroptera, Odonata and Plecoptera from the Zakarpats’Ka Region, Ukraine
    Kovacs_Karpatalja.qxd 2009.01.12. 10:23 Page 87 FOLIA HISTORICO NATURALIA MUSEI MATRAENSIS 2008 32: 87–91 Faunistical records of larvae of Ephemeroptera, Odonata and Plecoptera from the Zakarpats’ka Region, Ukraine TIBOR KOVÁCS & ROMAN J. GODUNKO ABSTRACT: This paper provides data on 45 Ephemeroptera, 6 Odonata species and 8 Plecoptera taxa from the Zakarpats’ka Region, Ukraine. The species Baetis tracheatus, Rhithrogena beskidensis, Paraleptophlebia werneri and Brachyptera risi are recorded in the first time from Ukraine. The following species are new to Zakarpats’ka Region and Tysa River: Baetis tricolor, Procloeon pulchrum, Electrogena affinis. The pupae of Symbiocladius rhithrogenae (Zavr4el, 1924) (Diptera: Chironomidae) were found on a few specimens of R. beskidensis. The data provided in this paper come from two sources. The majority is the results of a fau- nistical research focused on the Tysa river and its tributaries carried out in 6–7 May 2004 and 29–30 June 2004. The water sourses investigated are Chorna Tysa, Bila Tysa, Tysa (six sam- pling spots), Shopurka, Apshytsia, Teresva, Tereblia, Rika, Borzhava. The other four data are from the section of Bratovo (Batár) and Palad’ (Palád-patak) that represent the frontier between Ukraine and Hungary. Methods of collecting see in KOVÁCS et al. (1998), the collector is Tibor Kovács. The Ephe- meroptera and Plecoptera material on which the present study is based has been preserved in 70% ethanol and housed in the Mátra Museum (Gyöngyös, Hungary). Some specimens each of the species new to Ukraine are deposited in the State Museum of Natural History, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (SMNH).
    [Show full text]
  • Shooting Locations Guide Ukraine Contents
    SHOOTING LOCATIONS GUIDE UKRAINE CONTENTS Cherkasy Oblast ........................................... 3 Chernihiv Oblast .......................................... 6 Chernivtsi Oblast .......................................... 9 Dnipro Oblast ............................................... 11 Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast ................................ 12 Kharkiv Oblast .............................................. 15 Kherson Oblast ............................................. 17 Khmelnytskyi Oblast .................................... 20 Kyiv Oblast .................................................... 22 Lviv Oblast ..................................................... 27 Mykolaiv Oblast ............................................ 31 Odesa Oblast ................................................ 33 Poltava Oblast ............................................... 35 Rivne Oblast ................................................ 36 Sumy Oblast ................................................ 38 Vinnytsia Oblast ............................................ 40 Volyn Oblast ................................................ 41 Zakarpattia Oblast ........................................ 43 Zaporizhzhia Oblast ..................................... 46 Zhytomyr Oblast ........................................... 48 Ternopil Oblast ............................................. 49 — Nature reserve — Biosphere reserve — Industry building — National park — Historical and cultural reserve CHERKASY OBLAST Local authorities Cherkasy city Council 36 Baidy Vyshnevetskoho
    [Show full text]