DOCSLIB.ORG

Chapter 3 Non-Ideal Gases

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chapter 3 Non-Ideal Gases Chapter 3 Non-ideal Gases 1 2 CHAPTER 3. NON-IDEAL GASES Contents 3 Non-ideal Gases 1 3.1 Statistical Mechanics of Interacting Particles . 5 3.1.1 The partition function . 5 3.1.2 Cluster expansion . 6 3.1.3 Low density approximation . 7 3.1.4 Equation of state . 8 3.2 The Virial Expansion . 8 3.2.1 Virial coefficients . .8 3.2.2 Hard core potential . 10 3.2.3 Square-well potential . 12 3.2.4 Lennard-Jones potential . 13 3.2.5 The Sutherland potential . 17 3.2.6 Comparison of models . 20 3.2.7 Corresponding states . 21 3.2.8 Quantum gases – the special case(s) of helium . 22 3.3 Thermodynamics . 26 3.3.1 Throttling . 26 3.3.2 Joule-Thomson coefficient . 27 3.3.3 Connection with the second virial coefficient . 28 3.3.4 Inversion temperature . 29 3.4 Van der Waals Equation of State . 31 3.4.1 Approximating the Partition Function . 31 3.4.2 Van der Waals Equation . 32 3.4.3 Estimation of van der Waals Parameters . 34 3.4.4 Virial Expansion . 35 3.5 Other Phenomenological Equations of State . 35 3.5.1 The Dieterici equation . 35 3.5.2 The Berthelot equation . 37 3.5.3 The Redlich-Kwong equation . 37 3.6 Hard Sphere Gas . 38 3 4 CONTENTS 3.6.1 Possible approaches . 38 3.6.2 Hard Sphere Equation of state . 39 3.6.3 Virial Expansion . 40 3.6.4 Virial Coefficients . 41 3.6.5 Carnahan and Starling procedure . 42 3.6.6 Pad´eapproximants . 45 3.7 Bridge to the next chapter . 47 3.7.1 Van der Waals model . 49 3.7.2 Hard sphere model . 49 3.1. STATISTICAL MECHANICS OF INTERACTING PARTICLES 5 This chapter is devoted to considering systems where the interactions be- tween particles can no longer be ignored. We note that in the previous chapter we did indeed consider, albeit briefly, the effects of interactions in fermion and in boson gases. This chapter is concerned more with a system- atic treatment of interatomic interactions. Here the quantum aspect is but a complication and most of the discussions will thus take place within the context of a classical description. 3.1 Statistical Mechanics of Interacting Par- ticles 3.1.1 The partition function We are now considering gases where the interactions between the particles cannot be ignored. Our starting point is that everything can be found from the partition function. We will work, initially, in the classical framework where the energy function of the system is p2 H (p , q ) = i + U (q , q ) . (3.1.1) i i 2m i j i i<j X X Because of the interaction term U (qi, qj) the partition function can no longer be factorised into the product of single-particle partition functions. The many-body partition function is 1 p2/2m+ U(q ,q ) kT 3N 3N Z = e− ( i i i<j i j )/ d p d q (3.1.2) N!h3N Z P P where the factor 1/N! is used to account for the particles being indistinguish- able. While the partition function cannot be factorised into the product of single-particle partition functions, we can factor out the partition function for the non-interacting case since the energy is a sum of a momentum-dependent term (kinetic energy) and a coordinate-dependent term (potential energy). The non-interacting partition function is N V p2/2m kT 3N Z = e− ( i i )/ d p (3.1.3) id N!h3N Z P where the V factor comes from the integration over the qi. Thus the inter- acting partition function is 1 U(q ,q ) kT 3N Z = Z e−( i<j i j )/ d q. (3.1.4) id V N Z P 6 CONTENTS The “correction term” is referred to as the configuration integral. We denote this by Q 1 U(q ,q ) kT 3N Q = e−( i<j i j )/ d q. (3.1.5) V N Z P (Different authors have different pre-factors such as V or N!, but that is not important.) The partition function for the interacting system is then 1 V N Z = Q (3.1.6) N! Λ3 and the attention now focuses on evaluation/approximation of the configu- ration integral Q. 3.1.2 Cluster expansion We need a quantity in terms of which to perform an expansion. To this end we define U(q ,q )/kT f = e− i j 1, (3.1.7) ij − which has the property that fij is only appreciable when the particles are close together. In terms of this parameter the configuration integral is 1 Q = (1 + f ) d3N q (3.1.8) V N ij i i<j Z Y where the exponential of the sum has been factored into the product of exponentials. Next we expand the product as: (1 + fij) = 1 + fij + fijfkl + ... (3.1.9) i<j i<j i<j Y X X Xk<l The contributions to the second term are significant whenever pairs of parti- cles are close together. Diagrammatically we may represent the contributions to the second term as: Contributions to the third term are significant either, if i, j, k, l are distinct, when pairs i – j and k – l are simultaneously close together or, if j = k in the sums, when triples i, j, l are close together. The contributions to the third term may be represented as: The contributions to the higher order terms may be represented in a similar way. The general expansion in this way is called a “cluster expansion” for obvious reasons. 3.1. STATISTICAL MECHANICS OF INTERACTING PARTICLES 7 3.1.3 Low density approximation In the case of a dilute gas, we need only consider the effect of pairwise interactions – the first two terms of Eq. (3.1.9). This is because while the probability of two given particles being simultaneously close is small, the probability of three atoms being close is vanishingly small. Then we have (1 + f ) 1 + f (3.1.10) ij ≈ ij i<j i<j Y X so that, within this approximation, 1 Q = 1 + f d3N q V N ij i ( i<j ) Z X (3.1.11) 3N = 1 + fij d qi. i<j Z X There are N(N 1)/2 terms in the sum since we take all pairs without regard to order. And− for large N this may be approximated by N 2/2. Since the particles are identical, each integral in the sum will be the same, so that N 2 Q = 1 + f d3r . (3.1.12) 2V 12 12 Z The V N in the denominator has now become V since the integration over N 1 i, j = 1, 2 gives a factor V − in the numerator. Finally,6 then, we have the partition function for the interacting gas: 2 N U(r)/kT 3 Z = Z 1 + e− 1 d r (3.1.13) id 2V − Z and on taking the logarithm, the free energy is the sum of the non-interacting gas free energy and the new term 2 N U(r)/kT 3 F = F kT ln 1 + e− 1 d r . (3.1.14) id − 2V − Z 8 CONTENTS Since U(r) may be assumed to be spherically symmetric, in spherical polars we can integrate over the angular coordinates: ... d3r 4π r2 ... dr (3.1.15) → Z Z to give 2 N 2 U(r)/kT F = F kT ln 1 + 4π r e− 1 dr . (3.1.16) id − 2V − Z In this low density approximation the second term in the logarithm, which accounts for pairwise interactions, is much less than the first term. — Oth- erwise the third and higher-order terms would also be important. But if the second term is small then the logarithm can be expanded. Thus we obtain 2 N 2 U(r)/kT F = F 2πkT r e− 1 dr. (3.1.17) id − V − Z A more rigorous treatment of the cluster expansion technique, including the systematic incorporation of the higher-order terms, is given in the article by Mullin [1]. 3.1.4 Equation of state The pressure is found by differentiating the free energy: ∂F p = − ∂V T,N (3.1.18) 2 N N 2 U(r)/kT = kT kT 2π r e− 1 dr. V − V 2 − Z We see that the effect of the interaction U(r) can be regarded as modifying the pressure from the ideal gas value. The net effect can be either attractive or repulsive; decreasing or increasing the pressure. This will be examined, for various model interaction potentials U(r). However before that we considered a systematic way of generalising the gas equation of state. 3.2 The Virial Expansion 3.2.1 Virial coefficients At low densities we know that the equation of state reduces to the ideal gas equation. A systematic procedure for generalising the equation of state 3.2. THE VIRIAL EXPANSION 9 would therefore be as a power series in the number density N/V . Thus we write p N N 2 N 3 = + B (T ) + B (T ) + .... (3.2.1) kT V 2 V 3 V th The B factors are called virial coefficients; Bn is the n virial coefficient. By inspecting the equation of state derived above, Eq. (3.1.18), we see that it is equivalent to an expansion up to the second virial coefficient. And the second virial coefficient is given by ∞ 2 U(r)/kT B (T ) = 2π r e− 1 dr (3.2.2) 2 − − Z0 which should be “relatively” easy to evaluate once the form of the interpar- ticle interaction U(r) is known.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Joule-Thomson Expansion of Charged Ads Black Holes
    Joule-Thomson Expansion of Charged AdS Black Holes Ozg¨ur¨ Okc¨u¨ ∗ and Ekrem Aydınery Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Istanbul_ University, Istanbul,_ 34134, Turkey (Dated: January 24, 2017) In this paper, we study Joule-Thomson effects for charged AdS black holes. We obtain inversion temperatures and curves. We investigate similarities and differences between van der Waals fluids and charged AdS black holes for the expansion. We obtain isenthalpic curves for both systems in T − P plane and determine the cooling-heating regions. I. INTRODUCTION Variable cosmological constant notion has some nice features such as phase transition, heat cycles and com- It is well known that black holes as thermodynamic pressibility of black holes [41]. Applicabilities of these systems have many interesting consequences. It sets deep thermodynamic phenomena to black holes encourage us and fundamental connections between the laws of clas- to consider Joule-Thomson expansion of charged AdS sical general relativity, thermodynamics, and quantum black holes. In this letter, we study the Joule-Thompson mechanics. Since it has a key feature to understand expansion for chraged AdS black holes. We find sim- quantum gravity, much attention has been paid to the ilarities and differences with van der Waals fluids. In topic. The properties of black hole thermodynamics have Joule-Thomson expansion, gas at a high pressure passes been investigated since the first studies of Bekenstein and through a porous plug to a section with a low pressure Hawking [1{6]. When Hawking discovered that black and during the expansion enthalpy is constant. With holes radiate, black holes are considered as thermody- the Joule-Thomson expansion, one can consider heating- namic systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 Non-Ideal Gases
    Chapter 3 Non-ideal Gases This chapter is devoted to considering systems where the interactions be- tween particles can no longer be ignored. We note that in the previous chapter we did indeed consider, albeit briefly, the effects of interactions in fermion and in boson gases. This chapter is concerned more with a system- atic treatment of interatomic interactions. Here the quantum aspect is but a complication and most of the discussions will thus take place within the context of a classical description. 3.1 Statistical Mechanics of Interacting Par- ticles 3.1.1 The partition function We are now considering gases where the interactions between the particles cannot be ignored. Our starting point is that everything can be found from the partition function. We will work, initially, in the classical framework where the energy function of the system is p2 H (p , q ) = i + U (q , q ) . (3.1.1) i i 2m i j i i<j X X Because of the interaction term U (qi, qj) the partition function can no longer be factorised into the product of single-particle partition functions. The many-body partition function is 1 p2/2m+ U(q ,q ) kT 3N 3N Z = e− ( i i i<j i j )/ d p d q (3.1.2) N!h3N Z P P 133 134 CHAPTER 3. NON-IDEAL GASES where the factor 1/N! is used to account for the particles being indistinguish- able. While the partition function cannot be factorised into the product of single-particle partition functions, we can factor out the partition function for the non-interacting case since the energy is a sum of a momentum-dependent term (kinetic energy) and a coordinate-dependent term (potential energy).
    [Show full text]
  • Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
    Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics Richard Fitzpatrick Professor of Physics The University of Texas at Austin Contents 1 Introduction 7 1.1 IntendedAudience.................................. 7 1.2 MajorSources.................................... 7 1.3 Why Study Thermodynamics? ........................... 7 1.4 AtomicTheoryofMatter.............................. 7 1.5 What is Thermodynamics? . ........................... 8 1.6 NeedforStatisticalApproach............................ 8 1.7 MicroscopicandMacroscopicSystems....................... 10 1.8 Classical and Statistical Thermodynamics . .................... 10 1.9 ClassicalandQuantumApproaches......................... 11 2 Probability Theory 13 2.1 Introduction . .................................. 13 2.2 What is Probability? . ........................... 13 2.3 Combining Probabilities . ........................... 13 2.4 Two-StateSystem.................................. 15 2.5 CombinatorialAnalysis............................... 16 2.6 Binomial Probability Distribution . .................... 17 2.7 Mean,Variance,andStandardDeviation...................... 18 2.8 Application to Binomial Probability Distribution . ................ 19 2.9 Gaussian Probability Distribution . .................... 22 2.10 CentralLimitTheorem............................... 25 Exercises ....................................... 26 3 Statistical Mechanics 29 3.1 Introduction . .................................. 29 3.2 SpecificationofStateofMany-ParticleSystem................... 29 2 CONTENTS 3.3 Principle
    [Show full text]
  • An Important Practical Question Is What Happens When a Gas Is Expanded Into Vacuum Or a Very Low Pressure (Against “Zero External Pressure”)
    An important practical question is what happens when a gas is expanded into vacuum or a very low pressure (against “zero external pressure”). We saw already that W=0. And in a fundamental sense, it helps us to further illustrate the (usefulness of the) concept of enthalpy. Does the T decrease, as is typical when it is expanded adiabatically? Should it, if no work is done? (Remember that the adiabatic expansion curve on the P-v diagram is steeper than that of isothermal expansion!) Initial experiments (done by Joule in the 19th century) showed that, when the gas can be considered ideal, heat is neither evolved nor absorbed. Thus both heat and work are zero, which means that the internal energy remains constant: ∂U =0 ∂V T In fact, this condition is a complementary definition of an ideal gas, because Joule and Thomson -- two of the leading 'fathers' of thermodynamics, the latter immortalized as lord Kelvin -- subsequently showed that this is not true in general (for non-ideal or real gases). In fact, the ability to predict the so called Joule-Thomson inversion temperature (see relevant figures in the textbook) is often used as a litmus test for an equation of state. So the concept and the quantification of the Joule-Thomson coefficient is an essential topic in an introductory thermo course: ∂T ≡ μ ∂P H It turns out that the assumption Q=0 is more reasonable than the assumption W=0, because of the need to overcome the attractive (or repulsive!) forces between molecules. In other words, no ‘external’ work is done (by compressing the surroundings), but some ‘internal’ work is done..
    [Show full text]
  • Intro-Propulsion-Lect-19
    19 1 Lect-19 In this lecture ... • Helmholtz and Gibb’s functions • Legendre transformations • Thermodynamic potentials • The Maxwell relations • The ideal gas equation of state • Compressibility factor • Other equations of state • Joule-Thomson coefficient 2 Prof. Bhaskar Roy, Prof. A M Pradeep, Department of Aerospace, IIT Bombay Lect-19 Helmholtz and Gibbs functions • We have already discussed about a combination property, enthalpy, h. • We now introduce two new combination properties, Helmholtz function, a and the Gibbs function, g. • Helmholtz function, a: indicates the maximum work that can be obtained from a system. It is expressed as: a = u – Ts 3 Prof. Bhaskar Roy, Prof. A M Pradeep, Department of Aerospace, IIT Bombay Lect-19 Helmholtz and Gibbs functions • It can be seen that this is less than the internal energy, u, and the product Ts is a measure of the unavailable energy. • Gibbs function, g: indicates the maximum useful work that can be obtained from a system. It is expressed as: g = h – Ts • This is less than the enthalpy. 4 Prof. Bhaskar Roy, Prof. A M Pradeep, Department of Aerospace, IIT Bombay Lect-19 Helmholtz and Gibbs functions • Two of the Gibbs equations that were derived earlier (Tds relations) are: du = Tds – Pdv dh = Tds + vdP • The other two Gibbs equations are: a = u – Ts g = h – Ts • Differentiating, da = du – Tds – sdT dg = dh – Tds – sdT 5 Prof. Bhaskar Roy, Prof. A M Pradeep, Department of Aerospace, IIT Bombay Lect-19 Legendre transformations • A simple compressible system is characterized completely by its energy, u (or entropy, s) and volume, v: u = u(s,v) ⇒ du = Tds − Pdv ∂u ∂u such that T = P = ∂s v ∂v s Alternatively, in the entropy representation, s = s(u,v) ⇒ Tds = du + Pdv 1 ∂s P ∂s such that = = T ∂u v T ∂v u 6 Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Joule-Thomson Inversion Curves and Related Coefficients for Several Simple Fluids
    https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19720020315 2020-03-23T11:57:09+00:00Z I NASA TECHNICAL NOTE ni 0 h I 0 a0 Y -- = LOAN COPY: REhi­w­ z AFWL (DOE= c i KIRTLAND AFE~ZS 4 - 2 c/) L 4 - a JOULE-THOMSON INVERSION CURVES AND RELATED COEFFICIENTS FOR SEVERAL SIMPLE FLUIDS by Robert C. Hendricks, Ildiko C, Peller, dnd Anne K. Baron Lewis Research Center Cleveland, Ohio 44135 .. NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, D. C. JULY 1972 - -. 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. NASA TN D -68 07 I 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date JOULE-THOMSON INVERSION CURVES AND RELATED July 1972 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Robert C. Hendricks, lldiko C. Peller, and Anne K. Baron E- 6786 ~~ -10. Work Unit No. 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 113-31 Lewis Research Center 11. Contract or Grant No. National Aeronautics and Space Administration Cleveland, Ohio 44135 13. Type of Report and Period Covered '2. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address ITechnical Note National Aeronautics and Space Administration 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Washington, D. C. 20546 I 5. Supplementary Notes -~ . .. 6. Abstract The equations of state (PVT relations) for methane, oxygen, argon, carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, neon, hydrogen, and helium were used to establish Joule-Thomson inversion curves for each fluid. The principle of corresponding states was applied to the inversion curves, and a generalized inversion curve for fluids with small acentric factors was developed. The quan­ tum fluids (neon, hydrogen, and helium) were excluded from the generalization, but available data for the fluids xenon and krypton were included.
    [Show full text]
  • Statistical Physics Problem Set 8: Thermodynamics of Real Gases
    Statistical Physics xford hysics Second year physics course Dr A. A. Schekochihin and Prof. A. Boothroyd (with thanks to Prof. S. J. Blundell) Problem Set 8: Thermodynamics of Real Gases and Phase Equilibria ++ Statistical Mechanics Revision Questions (vacation work) Some useful constants −23 −1 Boltzmann's constant kB 1:3807 × 10 JK Stefan{Boltzmann constant σ 5:67 × 10−8 Wm−2K−4 23 −1 Avogadro's number NA 6:022 × 10 mol Standard molar volume 22:414 × 10−3 m3 mol−1 Molar gas constant R 8:315 J mol−1 K−1 1 pascal (Pa) 1 N m−2 1 standard atmosphere 1:0132 × 105 Pa (N m−2) 1 bar (= 1000 mbar) 105 N m−2 PROBLEM SET 8: Real Gases, Expansions and Phase Equilibria Problem set 8 can be covered in 1 tutorial. The relevant material will be done in lectures by the end of week 8 of Hilary Term. Starred questions (*) are harder. Revision questions are designed to build on the understanding of Statistical Mechanics developed in the two previous problem sets. Real gases 8.1 A gas obeys the equation p(V −b) = RT and has CV independent of temperature. Show that (a) the internal energy is a function of temperature only, (b) the ratio γ = Cp=CV is independent of temperature and pressure, (c) the equation of an adiabatic change has the form p(V − b)γ = constant. 8.2 Dieterici's equation of state for 1 mole is p(V − b) = RT e−a=RT V : (1) (a) Show that the critical point is specified by 2 2 Tc = a=4Rb; Vc = 2b; pc = a=4e b : (b) Show that equation (1) obeys a law of corresponding states, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Prediction of Differential Joule-Thomson Inversion Curves for Cryogens Using Equations of State
    PREDICTION OF DIFFERENTIAL JOULE-THOMSON INVERSION CURVES FOR CRYOGENS USING EQUATIONS OF STATE Nupura Ravishankar1, P.M. Ardhapurkar2, M.D. Atrey3 1Sardar Vallabhbhai National Institute of Technology, Surat – 395 007 2S.S.G.M. College of Engineering, Shegaon – 444 203 3Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai – 400 076 In many cryogenic applications, Joule–Thomson (J–T) effect is used to produce low temperatures. The isenthalpic expansion of gas results in lowering of temperature only if the initial temperature of the working fluid is below its characteristic temperature, called the inversion temperature. Inversion curves are helpful in studying the inversion temperatures. The prediction of inversion curves solely depends on the equation of state (EOS) for the working fluid. In the present work, various EOS are explored in order to predict the Joule–Thomson differential inversion curve for various commonly used cryogens viz. nitrogen, argon, carbon dioxide, helium, hydrogen and neon. The widely accepted EOS such as Van der Waals, Redlich–Kwong and Peng–Robinson EOS are used for this purpose. Key words: Inversion curve, Joule Thomson Effect, Van der Waal, Redlich Kwong, Peng Robinson INTRODUCTION Joule–Thomson coefficient, µJT and is given as, The Joule-Thomson (J-T) effect has been widely investigated because of its 흏푻 흁푱푻 = ( ) (1) importance for theoretical and practical 흏푷 푯 purposes. It has many cryogenic applications and is widely used in gas The locus of points for which μJT =0 is liquefaction. The effect describes called the differential inversion curve. The the temperature change of a gas or liquid inversion curve divides the p-T plane into when it is forced through a valve or porous two zones as shown in Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Joule-Thomson Process in Cryogenic Refrigeration Systems
    Library, B.». Bldg MAR 1 1 1965 Unical ^lote 9fe. 227 THE JOULE-THOMSON PROCESS IN CRYOGENIC REFRIGERATION SYSTEMS J. W. Dean and D. B. Mann U. S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE IATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS THE NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS The National Bureau of Standards is a principal focal point in the Federal Government for assuring maximum application of the physical and engineering sciences to the advancement of technology in industry and commerce. Its responsibilities include development and maintenance of the national stand- ards of measurement, and the provisions of means for making measurements consistent with those standards; determination of physical constants and properties of materials; development of methods for testing materials, mechanisms, and structures, and making such tests as may be necessary, particu- larly for government agencies; cooperation in the establishment of standard practices for incorpora- tion in codes and specifications; advisory service to government agencies on scientific and technical problems; invention and development of devices to serve special needs of the Government; assistance to industry, business, and consumers in the development and acceptance of commercial standards and simplified trade practice recommendations; administration of programs in cooperation with United States business groups and standards organizations for the development of international standards of practice; and maintenance of a clearinghouse for the collection and dissemination of scientific, tech- nical, and engineering information. The scope of the Bureau's activities is suggested in the following listing of its four Institutes and their organizational units. Institute for Basic Standards. Electricity. Metrology. Heat. Radiation Physics. Mechanics. Ap- plied Mathematics. Atomic Physics. Physical Chemistry. Laboratory Astrophysics.* Radio Stand- ards Laboratory: Radio Standards Physics; Radio Standards Engineering.** Office of Standard Ref- erence Data.
    [Show full text]
  • Joule-Thomson Inversion Curves and Related Coefficients for Several Simple Fluids
    I NASA TECHNICAL NOTE ni 0 h I 0 a0 Y -- = LOAN COPY: REhi­w­ z AFWL (DOE= c i KIRTLAND AFE~ZS 4 - 2 c/) L 4 - a JOULE-THOMSON INVERSION CURVES AND RELATED COEFFICIENTS FOR SEVERAL SIMPLE FLUIDS by Robert C. Hendricks, Ildiko C, Peller, dnd Anne K. Baron Lewis Research Center Cleveland, Ohio 44135 .. NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, D. C. JULY 1972 - -. 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. NASA TN D -68 07 I 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date JOULE-THOMSON INVERSION CURVES AND RELATED July 1972 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Robert C. Hendricks, lldiko C. Peller, and Anne K. Baron E- 6786 ~~ -10. Work Unit No. 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 113-31 Lewis Research Center 11. Contract or Grant No. National Aeronautics and Space Administration Cleveland, Ohio 44135 13. Type of Report and Period Covered '2. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address ITechnical Note National Aeronautics and Space Administration 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Washington, D. C. 20546 I 5. Supplementary Notes -~ . .. 6. Abstract The equations of state (PVT relations) for methane, oxygen, argon, carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, neon, hydrogen, and helium were used to establish Joule-Thomson inversion curves for each fluid. The principle of corresponding states was applied to the inversion curves, and a generalized inversion curve for fluids with small acentric factors was developed. The quan­ tum fluids (neon, hydrogen, and helium) were excluded from the generalization, but available data for the fluids xenon and krypton were included. The critical isenthalpic Joule-Thomson coefficient pc was determined; and a simplified approximation pc 3 Tc/6Pc was found adequate, where Tc and Pc are the temperature and pressure at the thermodynamic critical point.
    [Show full text]
  • Physical Chemistry- III (Classical Thermodynamics, Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics, Surface Chemistry, Fast Kinetics) Module No and Title 5, Joule Thomson Effect
    Subject Chemistry Paper No and Title 10, Physical Chemistry- III (Classical Thermodynamics, Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics, Surface chemistry, Fast kinetics) Module No and Title 5, Joule Thomson effect Module Tag CHE_P10_M5 CHEMISTRY Paper No. 10: Physical Chemistry- III (Classical Thermodynamics, Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics, Surface chemistry, Fast kinetics) Module No. 5: Joule Thomson effect TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Learning Outcomes 2. Introduction 3. Joule-Thomson effect 4. Joule Thomson coefficient 4.1 Joule Thomson coefficient for an ideal gas 4.2 Joule Thomson coefficient for a real gas 5. Derivation of Joule Thomson coefficient and Inversion temperature 6. Summary CHEMISTRY Paper No. 10: Physical Chemistry- III (Classical Thermodynamics, Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics, Surface chemistry, Fast kinetics) Module No. 5: Joule Thomson effect 1. Learning Outcomes After studying this module you shall be able to: Know about Throttling process Learn why Joule Thomson effect is known as isenthalpic process Differentiate between Joule Thomson coefficient of an ideal gas and Joule Thomson coefficient of real gas. Derive Joule Thomson coefficient 2. Introduction In thermodynamics, the effect called Joule Thomson effect was discovered in 1852. This effect was named after two physicists James Prescott Joule (1818-1889) and William Thomson (1824-1907). This effect describes the change in temperature of a real gas or liquid when it is forced to pass through porous plug or valve while it is kept insulated so that exchange of heat with the environment is not possible. This process is called throttling process or Joule Thomson effect. This effect is mainly used in thermal machines such as refrigerators, heat pumps and air conditioners.
    [Show full text]
  • Joule-Thomson Inversion Curves Calculation by Using Equation of State
    Asian Journal of Chemistry; Vol. 24, No. 2 (2012), 533-537 Joule-Thomson Inversion Curves Calculation by Using Equation of State 1,* 2 BEHZAD HAGHIGHI and MOHAMMAD REZA BOZORGMEHR 1Thermophysical Properties Research Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Birjand University, 97175-615, Birjand, Iran 2Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran *Corresponding author: E-mail: haghighi.behzad@gmail. com; behzadhaghighi_chem@yahoo. com (Received: 14 January 2011; Accepted: 3 October 2011) AJC-10475 Since the prediction of the Joule-Thomson inversion curve is known as a sever test of the equations of state (EoS). Some cubic equations of state (CEoS) can eventually have inadequate prediction for checking their ability to calculate the Joule-Thomson inversion curve. In this paper the Joule-Thomson inversion curve has been used to test the predictive capabilities of some recent equations of state. This enables us to judge the accuracy of the results obtained from different equations of state. These five equations of state are: Wang- Gmehling (WG) equations of state, modified Peng-Robinson by Twu-Coon-Cunningham (PR-TCC) equations of state, Riazi-Mansoori (RM) equations of state, Geana equations of state and modified Peng- Robinson-Stryjek-Vera proposed by Samir I. Abu-Eishah (PRSV2) equations of state. All of these equations of state are modified van der Waals (vdW) equations of state recommended in the literature for estimating volumetric properties of relevant compounds. As a corollary to the present study, we have perceived that the investigated equations of state give good prediction of the low-temperature branch of the inversion curve, except for Riazi-Mansoori and Geana equations of state.
    [Show full text]