The Regular Meeting Pennsylvania Transportation 27, 2017 At
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
At-A-Glance MEDIA INFORMATION GUIDE
At-A-Glance MEDIA INFORMATION GUIDE SEPTA.ORG/MEDIA UPDATED June 2018 THEN & NOW HISTORY On February 18, 1964, the Pennsylvania General Assembly established the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) to provide public transit services for Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Montgomery and Philadelphia Counties. The Center City Commuter Tunnel (CCCT) which was opened in 1984, joined the previously separate Penn Central and Reading Railroads by turning the two terminal stations into through stations, resulting in a more efficient system. TIMELINE: To build the network of services our customers know today, transportation companies were acquired through our history. 1968 – Philadelphia Transportation Company (PTC) 1969 – Philadelphia Suburban Transportation Company (Red Arrow) 1976 – Schuylkill Valley Lines (Frontier) 1983 – Regional Rail (Conrail commuter rail services) 1984 – Center City Commuter Tunnel (CCCT) opened 1985 – Airport Regional Rail Line opened SERVICE AREA Today, SEPTA is the nation’s sixth largest public transportation system, and the largest in Pennsylvania, serving the five- county area of Philadelphia, Bucks, Chester, Delaware and Montgomery Counties (2,202 square miles) with a population of approximately four million. The system also extends into central New Jersey and northern Delaware. SEPTA’s vast network of fixed route services includes bus, subway, trolley, trackless trolley, high speed and Regional Rail and serves approximately 1.3 million customers daily. SEPTA is also one of the region’s largest employers, with a workforce of more than 9,600. BUDGET SEPTA’s Fiscal Year 2019 operating budget is $1.45 billion; its Fiscal Year 2019 Capital Budget is $749.62 million. SEPTA.ORG/MEDIA UPDATED June 2018 MEDIA INFORMATION & INQUIRIES The Media Relations Department is under the Public topic of the interview. -
IN the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the EASTERN DISTRICT of PENNSYLVANIA CATHERINE NATSU LANNING, Et Al., : CIVIL ACTION : Plaintiffs, : : V
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CATHERINE NATSU LANNING, et al., : CIVIL ACTION : Plaintiffs, : : v. : : SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA : TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, : : Defendant. : NO. 97-0593 _________________________________________________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : CIVIL ACTION : Plaintiff, : : v. : : SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA : TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, : : Defendant. : NO. 97-1161 _________________________________________________________________ Newcomer, J. June , 1998 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW After a bench trial of this case on January 7-9, 12-16, 20, 21, 23, and 26, 1998, and after considering the testimony of the witnesses, the admitted exhibits and the arguments of counsel, and the parties' post-trial submissions, the Court makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law. FINDINGS OF FACT A. The Parties 1. The individual named plaintiffs in Civil Action No. 97- 0593 are Catherine Natsu Lanning, Denise Dougherty, Altovise Love, Belinda Kelly Dodson and Lynne Zirilli (formerly Lynne Carapucci). 2. The plaintiff class in Civil Action No. 97-0593 was certified by the Court on August 10, 1997 pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(b)(2) and is defined as: all 1993 female applicants, 1996 female applicants and future female applicants for employment as SEPTA police officers who have been or will be denied employment by reason of their inability to meet the physical entrance requirement of running 1.5 miles in 12 minutes or less. 3. The plaintiff in Civil Action No. 97-1161 is the United States of America ("United States"). 4. Defendant is the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority ("SEPTA"), a regional mass transit authority that currently operates under authority of the Metropolitan Transportation Authorities Act, 74 Pa. -
Electric Bus Feasibility Study for the City of Edmonton
I II ELECTRIC BUS FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR THE CITY OF EDMONTON JUNE 2016 A REPORT PREPARED BY III IV TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1 DESCRIPTION OF MANDATE 1:1 1.2 CONCLUSIONS 1:1 1.3 MAIN FINDINGS 1:4 1.3.1 CUSTOMER PERCEPTIONS OF THE E-BUSES 1:4 1.3.2 ETS AND CITY STAFF PERCEPTIONS OF THE E-BUSES 1:4 1.3.3 DESCRIPTION OF THE FIELD TRIALS 1:5 1.3.4 EXPECTED RELIABILITY OF E-BUSES IN SERVICE 1:6 1.3.5 EXTERNALITIES 1:7 1.3.6 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF E-BUSES AT ETS 1:8 1.3.7 THE ELECTRIC BUS TECHNOLOGY AND ITS EVOLUTION 1:9 1.4 THE BUSINESS CASE FOR E-BUSES IN EDMONTON 1:10 1.5 RECOMMENDATIONS 1:13 2 DESCRIPTION OF MANDATE 2.1 OBJECTIVES OF THIS STUDY 2:1 2.2 METHODOLOGY 2:1 2.3 LIMITATIONS OF THIS REPORT 2:2 3 DESCRIPTION OF FIELD TRIALS 3.1 THE ELECTRIC BUSES USED FOR WINTER EVALUATION 3:1 3.2 DURATION AND TIMING OF THE TRIALS 3:4 3.3 DUTY CYCLES OF THE BUSES 3:5 3.4 CLIMATIC CONDITIONS DURING THE TRIALS 3:6 3.5 DATA COLLECTION DURING THE FIELD TRIALS 3:7 3.6 AVAILABILITY OF THE BUSES DURING TRIALS 3:7 3.7 EXTRAORDINARY EVENTS 3:7 3.8 ANALYSIS AND SUMMARY OF TRIALS 3:8 3.8.1 RANGE, STATE OF CHARGE (SOC), ENERGY USAGE (TOTAL TEST AVERAGE) 3:8 3.8.2 TEMPERATURE AND ENERGY USAGE 3:10 3.8.3 ROUTE ANALYSIS 3:13 3.8.4 IMPACT OF SLOPE ON ENERGY CONSUMPTION 3:14 3.8.5 INTERIOR BUS TEMPERATURE ANALYSIS 3:18 3.8.6 OTHER PERFORMANCE PARAMETERS 3:20 3.9 KEY FINDINGS 3:21 4 CUSTOMER PERCEPTIONS OF THE E-BUSES 4.1 METHODOLOGY 4:1 4.2 E-BUS RIDER PERCEPTIONS (AS MEASURED DURING TRIALS) 4:2 4.2.1 BUS MODEL 4:2 4.2.2 NOTICED A DIFFERENT DESIGN -
FISCAL YEAR 2021 OPERATING BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-2026 • Financial Projections
Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority FISCAL YEAR 2021 OPERATING BUDGET Fiscal Year 2022-2026 • Financial Projections Essential Service Provider to the Region Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) presented a Distinguished Budget Presentation Award to Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority, Pennsylvania, for its Annual Budget for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2019. In order to receive this award, a governmental unit must publish a budget document that meets program criteria as a policy document, as a financial plan, as an operations guide, and as a communications device. This award is valid for a period of one year only. We believe our current budget continues to conform to program requirements, and we are submitting it to GFOA to determine its eligibility for another award. i Return to Table of Contents Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority Board Members Chairman Pasquale T. Deon, Sr. Vice-Chairman Honorable Kenneth Lawrence, Jr. Bucks County Chester County Delaware County Pasquale T. Deon, Sr. Joseph E. Brion, Esquire Thomas E. Babcock Charles H. Martin Kevin L. Johnson, P.E. Mark H. Dambly Montgomery County City of Philadelphia Robert D. Fox, Esquire Michael A. Carroll, P.E. Honorable Kenneth Lawrence, Jr. Deborah Mahler Governor’s Appointee Obra S. Kernodle, IV Senate Majority House Majority Leader Appointee Leader Appointee Honorable Stewart J. Greenleaf, Esquire Honorable Marcy Toepel Senate Minority House Minority Leader Appointee Leader Appointee William J. Leonard, Esquire John I. Kane SEPTA Officers General Manager Leslie S. Richards Deputy General Manager - Treasurer Richard G. Burnfield General Counsel Gino J. Benedetti, Esquire Controller to the Board Stephen A. -
Electrification of the Sunshine Coast Transit System: a Feasibility Study
Electrification of the Sunshine Coast Transit System: A Feasibility Study ENVR 400 Final Report Carol Fu Jason Lin Michelle Marcus Tom Cui In collaboration with the 2 Degrees Institute University of British Columbia ENVR 400: Community Project in Environmental Science Research Advisor: Tara Ivanochko April 9, 2020 Table of Contents Abstract 5 Author Biographies 6 Introduction 7 The Climate Emergency 7 The Sunshine Coast Transit System 7 Figure 1. 8 Figure 2. 9 Table 1. 9 Project Aims 10 Electric Bus Operations 10 Overview of Trade-offs Between Technologies 10 Table 2. 11 Figure 3. 12 Figure 4. 12 1) Infrastructure requirements 12 Summary: Electric Bus Operations 14 Optimization of Bus Charging Schedules 14 Methodology 14 Figure 5. 15 Figure 6. 16 Results and Discussion 17 Table 3. 17 Figure 7. 18 Figure 8. 19 Summary: Optimization of Bus Charging Schedules 19 Life Cycle Cost Analysis 19 Methodology 19 Table 4. 20 Figure 9. 20 Table 5. 21 Table 6. 23 Figure 10. 24 2 Table 7. 24 Figure 11. 25 Discussion 25 Summary: Life Cycle Cost Analysis 26 Ridership Strategies 26 Figure 12. 27 Literature Review: Ridership Improvement Strategies 27 Table 8. 30 Figure 13. 30 Figure 14. 30 Results and Discussion 31 Table 9. 31 Summary: Ridership Strategies 33 Conclusion, Limitations and Further Studies 33 Conclusion 33 Limitations 34 Further Studies 34 Acknowledgements 35 References 36 Appendix I: Optimization of Charging Schedules 42 Mathematical Reasoning Behind Charging Schedule Algorithm 42 Algorithm Code in R 42 Appendix II: Ridership Strategies 47 Table 10. 47 Table 11. 48 3 Abstract Electrifying transportation is a necessary part of reducing greenhouse gas emissions in order to mitigate global climate change. -
The US Transit Bus Manufacturing Industry
San Jose State University SJSU ScholarWorks Mineta Transportation Institute Publications 10-2016 The US Transit Bus Manufacturing Industry David Czerwinski San Jose State University, [email protected] Xu (Cissy) Hartling Salem State University Jing Zhang San Jose State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/mti_publications Part of the Public Policy Commons, and the Transportation Commons Recommended Citation David Czerwinski, Xu (Cissy) Hartling, and Jing Zhang. "The US Transit Bus Manufacturing Industry" Mineta Transportation Institute Publications (2016). This Report is brought to you for free and open access by SJSU ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Mineta Transportation Institute Publications by an authorized administrator of SJSU ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MTI Funded by U.S. Department of Services Transit Census California of Water 2012 Transportation and California The US Transit Bus Department of Transportation Manufacturing Industry MTI ReportMTI 12-02 December 2012 MTI Report 12-66 MINETA TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE MTI FOUNDER LEAD UNIVERSITY OF MNTRC Hon. Norman Y. Mineta The Mineta Transportation Institute (MTI) was established by Congress in 1991 as part of the Intermodal Surface Transportation MTI/MNTRC BOARD OF TRUSTEES Equity Act (ISTEA) and was reauthorized under the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st century (TEA-21). MTI then successfully competed to be named a Tier 1 Center in 2002 and 2006 in the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Founder, Honorable Norman Joseph Boardman (Ex-Officio) Diane Woodend Jones (TE 2019) Richard A. White (Ex-Officio) Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU). -
Best Practices and Key Considerations For
BEST PRACTICES AND KEY CONSIDERATIONS FOR TRANSIT ELECTRIFICATION AND CHARGING INFRASTRUCTURE DEPLOYMENT TO DELIVER PREDICTABLE, RELIABLE, AND COST-EFFECTIVE FLEET SYSTEMS First Published JUNE 2020 Edition 2.0 SEPTEMBER 2020 AUTHORS Dr.Josipa Petrunic, President & CEO Dr. Elnaz Abotalebi, Researcher & Project Lead Dr. Abhishek Raj, Researcher c 2 COPYRIGHT © 2020 Information in this document is to be considered the intellectual property of the Canadian Urban Transit Research and Innovation Consortium in accordance with Canadian copyright law. This report was prepared by the Canadian Urban Transit Research and Innovation Consortium for the account of Natural Resources Canada. The material in it reflects the Canadian Urban Transit Research and Innovation Consortium’s best judgment in light of the information available to it at the time of preparation. Any use that a third party makes of this report or any reliance on or decisions to be made based on it are the responsibility of such third parties. The Canadian Urban Transit Research and Innovation Consortium accepts no responsibility of such third parties. The Canadian Urban Transit Research and Innovation Consortium accepts no responsibility for damages, if any, suffered by any third party as a result of decisions made or actions based on this report. UPDATE: COVID-19 PUBLICATION IMPACT The publication of this report has been delayed by three months due to the COVID-19 global pandemic. This report, and the majority of research included within it, was completed primarily between September 2019 and March 2020 – prior to the novel coronavirus pandemic affecting local economies and transit revenue across Canada. While efforts have been made to include relevant announcements by Canadian transit agencies since that time, specifically as they relate to electric buses, many investment decisions and funding programs related to municipal green infrastructure deployments may change this year as a result of the financial crisis unfolding in cities across the country. -
Proterra Response to Delaware EMP.Pdf
Exhibit A The Public Transit Electrification Project: Sustainable Mobility for Delaware Project Application Information Proterra Inc. Eric J. McCarthy Private Corporation (Non-Government) 1 Whitlee Court, Greenville, SC 29607 864-214-2668 [email protected] PROJECT SUMMARY Zero-emission public transit buses are ripe for immediate scaling and investment from the Environmental Mitigation Trust to help carry out the goals of Delaware’s mitigation plan to reduce nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions and expedite deployment and widespread adoption of zero-emission vehicles. The Public Transit Electrification Project will initially deploy 5 zero-emission, battery-electric transit buses and 5 multi-use depot charging stations at one or more Delaware municipalities to provide electric mobility for all Delaware residents and serve as a strong spark to accelerate the deployment of ZEVs, reduce diesel emissions and eliminate toxic air pollutants. The size of the project, however, can easily scale to accommodate other interested transit agencies and/or airports. Proterra, the leading U.S. provider of zero-emission, all-electric transit solutions, designs and manufactures the world’s most fuel-efficient battery electric bus and features on-route, fast-charge technology that offers functionally unlimited range, as well as an extended range version that enables transit agencies to travel 350 miles on a single charge. Proterra’s CATALYST™ bus achieves 22+ MPGe performance, 500%+ better than diesel and CNG buses, eliminating toxic diesel particulate matter and reducing carbon emissions by 70% or more compared to CNG or diesel buses. To date, Proterra’s buses have logged 4.5+ million miles of service in cities across the United States. -
Testimony of Jeffrey D. Knueppel General Manager Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority
Testimony Of Jeffrey D. Knueppel General Manager Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority Philadelphia City Council Fiscal Year 2020 Operating Budget April 30, 2019 Good morning Council President Clarke, Transportation Committee Chair Johnson, members of City Council and other guests. I am Jeff Knueppel, and I am honored to come before you today as the General Manager for the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA). I am joined by SEPTA Philadelphia Board member, Michael Carroll, Deputy Managing Director, Office of Transportation, Infrastructure and Sustainability (OTIS). I am pleased to submit testimony supporting the Authority’s $87.6 million Fiscal Year 2020 Operating Budget request and provide the members of Council with an overview of SEPTA initiatives and milestones achieved during the past year. SEPTA’s operating budget is funded through subsidies from local, state and federal governments, the fare box and other revenues. The City’s $87.6 million contribution represents six (6) percent of the Authority’s total operating budget, and enables SEPTA to meet its state legislatively mandated requirement to secure local matching funds to match state operating subsidy dollars of approximately $739 million. SEPTA’s Fiscal Year 2020 operating budget maintains current service levels, with no increase in fares for customers. For SEPTA’s Fiscal Year 2020 capital budget, the City’s $4.58 million contribution will support a Capital Program of approximately $675 million. SEPTA is investing in critical infrastructure in Philadelphia and advancing projects including: modernization of 30th Street Station on the Market–Frankford Line, expansion of the Wissahickon Transportation Center, accessibility improvements to Susquehanna-Dauphin and Tasker-Morris Stations on the Broad Street Line, ongoing rehabilitation of the 15th Street and City Hall Stations complex, and continued improvements to the Center City Concourse network. -
ELECTRIFYING TRANSIT: a GUIDEBOOK for IMPLEMENTING BATTERY ELECTRIC BUSES Alana Aamodt, Karlynn Cory, and Kamyria Coney National Renewable Energy Laboratory
ELECTRIFYING TRANSIT: A GUIDEBOOK FOR IMPLEMENTING BATTERY ELECTRIC BUSES Alana Aamodt, Karlynn Cory, and Kamyria Coney National Renewable Energy Laboratory April 2021 A product of the USAID-NREL Partnership Contract No. IAG-17-2050 NOTICE This work was authored, in part, by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), operated by Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC, for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) under Contract No. DE- AC36-08GO28308. Funding provided by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) under Contract No. IAG-17-2050 as well as the Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Workforce Development for Teachers and Scientists, Science Undergraduate Laboratory Internship. The views expressed in this report do not necessarily represent the views of the DOE or the U.S. Government, or any agency thereof, including USAID. This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) reports produced after 1991 and a growing number of pre-1991 documents are available free via www.OSTI.gov. Cover photo from iStock 1184915589. NREL prints on paper that contains recycled content. Acknowledgments The authors would like to thank Sarah Lawson and Andrew Fang of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) for their review and support for this work. We wish to thank our National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) colleagues, Andrea Watson and Alexandra Aznar, for their support of this report. Other NREL colleagues, including Caley Johnson, Leslie Eudy, and Scott Belding provided invaluable public transit electrification insight for this project. -
FY 2022 Capital Budget and FY 2022-2033 Capital Program Proposal
FISCAL YEAR 2022 CAPITAL BUDGET and FISCAL YEARS 2022-2033 CAPITAL PROGRAM PROPOSAL Including Reduced Funding Capital Program Scenario FY 2022 CAPITAL BUDGET AND FY 2022-2033 CAPITAL PROGRAM Proposal April 26, 2021 FY 2022 CAPITAL BUDGET AND FY 2022 - 2033 CAPITAL PROGRAM Table of Contents Executive Summary…............................................................................................................. 1 Introduction to SEPTA............................................................................................................ 4 SEPTA Forward - 5-Year Strategic Business Plan…............................................................. 8 Impacts of SEPTA's Capital Program……………………………................................................... 9 SEPTA’s Projects of Significance ……………………………………………....................................... 12 Sources of Capital Funding..................................................................................................... 15 FY 2022 Capital Budget and FY 2022-2033 Capital Program: Current Funding Level Program……..……………………………………............................ 20 Neshaminy Substation Reduced Funding Level Program……...…………………………….................................. 22 Capital Program and Project Descriptions 28 Bridge Program.............................................................................................................. 29 Communications, Signal Systems and Technology..................................................... 34 Financial Obligations..................................................................................................... -
The Regular Meeting Pennsylvania Transportation 27, 2014 At
MINUTES OF REGULAR BOARD MEETING OF SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY MARCH 27, 2014 The Regular Meeting of the Board of the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority was held on Thursday, March 27, 2014 at 3:06 PM, in the Board Room of the Authority, with the Chairman in the Chair. Present Attending the meeting were the following Board members: Pasquale T. Deon, Sr., Chairman Thomas E. Babcock, Vice Chairman Beverly Coleman Rina Cutler Thomas Jay Ellis, Esquire Honorable Stewart J. Greenleaf Kevin L. Johnson, P.E. John I. Kane Daniel J. Kubik Kenneth E. Lawrence, Jr. Honorable Charles H. Martin Honorable Leslie S. Richards James C. Schwartzman, Esquire Cuyler H. Walker, Esquire (via telephone) Present from the staff: Joseph M. Casey, General Manager James B. Jordan, Esquire, General Counsel Richard G. Burnfield, Chief Financial Officer/Treasurer Jeffrey D. Knueppel, Deputy General Manager Stephen A. Jobs, Controller Carol R. Looby, Secretary Kim Scott Heinle, AGM, Customer Service Ronald G. Hopkins, AGM, Operations Francis E. Kelly, AGM, Government & Public Affairs Susan Van Buren, AGM, Human Resources Mr. Deon called the Regular Meeting of the Board to order. Mr. Deon said the Special Meeting, which was noticed, was cancelled. Mr. Deon announced that Cuyler Walker would be participating by phone. Mr. Walker acknowledged his presence. Pledge of Allegiance was observed. Mr. Deon announced that the Board met in Executive Session just prior to the meeting to discuss legal matters. Minutes of Regular Board Meeting March 27, 2014 Mr. Deon stated that if there were speakers who wished to address agenda items they would be called before the Board voted on the i tern and asked that they limit their remarks to three minutes.