Journal List with Impact Factors
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Current Issues in Victimization Research and the NCVS's Ability To
Current Issues in Victimization Research and the NCVS’s Ability to Study Them Lynn A. Addington, J.D., Ph.D. Department of Justice, Law and Society American University Prepared for presentation at the Bureau of Justice Statistics Data User’s Workshop, February 12, 2008, Washington, D.C. Introduction and NCVS have played an essential role in shaping what researchers know about victimization as well as providing Thirty-five years have passed since the fielding of the first the national measure of criminal victimization for the National Crime Survey (NCS) and 15 years since its redesign United States.2 For the NCVS to continue in this crucial and emergence as the National Crime Victimization Survey and central role, it should be capable of serving the needs of (NCVS).1 This BJS Data Users Workshop presents a good, researchers, practitioners, and policymakers. Continuing to and much-needed, opportunity to examine how the survey meet the current needs of these various users of NCVS data has been (and could be) used in its present form as well as may require changes to the survey. to consider possible ways the survey could be changed to explore new issues of concern to victimization researchers. This paper has two primary aims. The first is to provide an Current Trends and Open Issues in overview of the current trends and issues in victimization Victimization Research research. Trends include topics that have attracted research Before examining specific issues, it is useful to place the attention as well as those yet to be fully explored as available current state of victimization research into a larger context. -
1 Data Policies of Highly-Ranked Social Science
1 Data policies of highly-ranked social science journals1 Mercè Crosas2, Julian Gautier2, Sebastian Karcher3, Dessi Kirilova3, Gerard Otalora2, Abigail Schwartz2 Abstract By encouraging and requiring that authors share their data in order to publish articles, scholarly journals have become an important actor in the movement to improve the openness of data and the reproducibility of research. But how many social science journals encourage or mandate that authors share the data supporting their research findings? How does the share of journal data policies vary by discipline? What influences these journals’ decisions to adopt such policies and instructions? And what do those policies and instructions look like? We discuss the results of our analysis of the instructions and policies of 291 highly-ranked journals publishing social science research, where we studied the contents of journal data policies and instructions across 14 variables, such as when and how authors are asked to share their data, and what role journal ranking and age play in the existence and quality of data policies and instructions. We also compare our results to the results of other studies that have analyzed the policies of social science journals, although differences in the journals chosen and how each study defines what constitutes a data policy limit this comparison. We conclude that a little more than half of the journals in our study have data policies. A greater share of the economics journals have data policies and mandate sharing, followed by political science/international relations and psychology journals. Finally, we use our findings to make several recommendations: Policies should include the terms “data,” “dataset” or more specific terms that make it clear what to make available; policies should include the benefits of data sharing; journals, publishers, and associations need to collaborate more to clarify data policies; and policies should explicitly ask for qualitative data. -
D2.2: Research Data Exchange Solution
H2020-ICT-2018-2 /ICT-28-2018-CSA SOMA: Social Observatory for Disinformation and Social Media Analysis D2.2: Research data exchange solution Project Reference No SOMA [825469] Deliverable D2.2: Research Data exchange (and transparency) solution with platforms Work package WP2: Methods and Analysis for disinformation modeling Type Report Dissemination Level Public Date 30/08/2019 Status Final Authors Lynge Asbjørn Møller, DATALAB, Aarhus University Anja Bechmann, DATALAB, Aarhus University Contributor(s) See fact-checking interviews and meetings in appendix 7.2 Reviewers Noemi Trino, LUISS Datalab, LUISS University Stefano Guarino, LUISS Datalab, LUISS University Document description This deliverable compiles the findings and recommended solutions and actions needed in order to construct a sustainable data exchange model for stakeholders, focusing on a differentiated perspective, one for journalists and the broader community, and one for university-based academic researchers. SOMA-825469 D2.2: Research data exchange solution Document Revision History Version Date Modifications Introduced Modification Reason Modified by v0.1 28/08/2019 Consolidation of first DATALAB, Aarhus draft University v0.2 29/08/2019 Review LUISS Datalab, LUISS University v0.3 30/08/2019 Proofread DATALAB, Aarhus University v1.0 30/08/2019 Final version DATALAB, Aarhus University 30/08/2019 Page | 1 SOMA-825469 D2.2: Research data exchange solution Executive Summary This report provides an evaluation of current solutions for data transparency and exchange with social media platforms, an account of the historic obstacles and developments within the subject and a prioritized list of future scenarios and solutions for data access with social media platforms. The evaluation of current solutions and the historic accounts are based primarily on a systematic review of academic literature on the subject, expanded by an account on the most recent developments and solutions. -
A Comprehensive Analysis of the Journal Evaluation System in China
A comprehensive analysis of the journal evaluation system in China Ying HUANG1,2, Ruinan LI1, Lin ZHANG1,2,*, Gunnar SIVERTSEN3 1School of Information Management, Wuhan University, China 2Centre for R&D Monitoring (ECOOM) and Department of MSI, KU Leuven, Belgium 3Nordic Institute for Studies in Innovation, Research and Education, Tøyen, Oslo, Norway Abstract Journal evaluation systems are important in science because they focus on the quality of how new results are critically reviewed and published. They are also important because the prestige and scientific impact of journals is given attention in research assessment and in career and funding systems. Journal evaluation has become increasingly important in China with the expansion of the country’s research and innovation system and its rise as a major contributor to global science. In this paper, we first describe the history and background for journal evaluation in China. Then, we systematically introduce and compare the most influential journal lists and indexing services in China. These are: the Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD); the journal partition table (JPT); the AMI Comprehensive Evaluation Report (AMI); the Chinese STM Citation Report (CJCR); the “A Guide to the Core Journals of China” (GCJC); the Chinese Social Sciences Citation Index (CSSCI); and the World Academic Journal Clout Index (WAJCI). Some other lists published by government agencies, professional associations, and universities are briefly introduced as well. Thereby, the tradition and landscape of the journal evaluation system in China is comprehensively covered. Methods and practices are closely described and sometimes compared to how other countries assess and rank journals. Keywords: scientific journal; journal evaluation; peer review; bibliometrics 1 1. -
Downloaded Manually1
The Journal Coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a Comparative Analysis Philippe Mongeon and Adèle Paul-Hus [email protected]; [email protected] Université de Montréal, École de bibliothéconomie et des sciences de l'information, C.P. 6128, Succ. Centre-Ville, H3C 3J7 Montréal, Qc, Canada Abstract Bibliometric methods are used in multiple fields for a variety of purposes, namely for research evaluation. Most bibliometric analyses have in common their data sources: Thomson Reuters’ Web of Science (WoS) and Elsevier’s Scopus. This research compares the journal coverage of both databases in terms of fields, countries and languages, using Ulrich’s extensive periodical directory as a base for comparison. Results indicate that the use of either WoS or Scopus for research evaluation may introduce biases that favor Natural Sciences and Engineering as well as Biomedical Research to the detriment of Social Sciences and Arts and Humanities. Similarly, English-language journals are overrepresented to the detriment of other languages. While both databases share these biases, their coverage differs substantially. As a consequence, the results of bibliometric analyses may vary depending on the database used. Keywords Bibliometrics, citations indexes, Scopus, Web of Science, research evaluation Introduction Bibliometric and scientometric methods have multiple and varied application realms, that goes from information science, sociology and history of science to research evaluation and scientific policy (Gingras, 2014). Large scale bibliometric research was made possible by the creation and development of the Science Citation Index (SCI) in 1963, which is now part of Web of Science (WoS) alongside two other indexes: the Social Science Citation Index (SSCI) and the Arts and Humanities Citation Index (A&HCI) (Wouters, 2006). -
Violent Victimization As a Risk Factor For
U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention J. Robert Flores, Administrator December 2002 Violent Victimization as a Risk Factor for Violent A Message From OJJDP Compared with adults, juveniles are disproportionately affected by high Offending Among Juveniles rates of violence as both offenders and victims. Understanding the rela- tionship between victimization and offending is therefore of critical Jennifer N. Shaffer and R. Barry Ruback importance. As a group, juveniles have high rates of vi- and many of these risk factors suggest Examining data from the National olent victimization and violent offending, a opportunities for intervention. Longitudinal Study of Adolescent pattern suggesting that some juveniles are Health, the authors of this Bulletin The Bulletin includes background informa- both victims and perpetrators of violence. found that victims of violence were tion, a brief theoretical discussion, study To explore that hypothesis, this Bulletin significantly more likely than nonvic- methods and findings, conclusions, policy analyzes the relationships between violent tims to become violent offenders. implications, and suggestions for future victimization and violent offending across They also found that violent victim- research. a 2-year period, using data for 5,003 juve- ization and violent offending share niles who participated in the National Lon- many of the same risk factors, such gitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. The Background as previous violent victimization and Bulletin looks at victimization and offend- offending, drug and alcohol use, and ing experiences in subgroups of juveniles Statistical evidence suggests dispropor- depression. These findings are partic- classified by age, gender, race, and level tionately high rates of violence by and ularly important because they sug- gest that interventions directed at of physical development. -
Infrastructure and Career Opportunities in Addiction Science: the Emergence of an Interdisciplinary Field Thomas F
CHAPTER 2 Infrastructure and Career Opportunities in Addiction Science : The Emergence of an Interdisciplinary Field Thomas F. Babor, Dominique Morisano, Jonathan Noel, Katherine Robaina, Judit H. Ward and Andrea L. Mitchell Introduction During the latter part of the 20th century, there was rapid growth in the number of people employed in the societal management of social and medical problems associated with the use of alcohol, tobacco, and illicit drugs (Edwards & Babor, 2012). At the same time, similar growth occurred in the number of institutions and individuals engaged in addiction science. The current worldwide infra- structure of addiction science includes numerous research funding sources, more than 90 specialized scholarly journals, scores of professional societies, over 200 research centers, more than 80 specialty training programs, and thou- sands of scientists. The purpose of this chapter is to describe the global infrastructure support- ing addiction science and the career opportunities available to addiction sci- entists. The current global infrastructure is evaluated from two perspectives: (a) its ability to produce basic knowledge about the causes of addiction and the mechanisms by which psychoactive substances affect health and well-being and (b) its ability to address substance-related problems throughout the world at both the individual and the population levels. The first perspective speaks How to cite this book chapter: Babor, T F, Morisano, D, Noel, J, Robaina, K, Ward, J H and Mitchell, A L. 2017. Infrastructure and Career Opportunities in Addiction Science : The Emergence of an Interdisciplinary Field. In: Babor, T F, Stenius, K, Pates, R, Miovský, M, O’Reilly, J and Candon, P. -
Scopus Content Coverage Guide
Content Coverage Guide Open to accelerate science Contents 1. Introduction 4 1.1 Scopus – an overview .................................................................................................................................................. 4 1.2 Content Selection & Advisory Board (CSAB) ........................................................................................................ 6 1.3 Purpose and scope of this Content Coverage Guide (CCG) ................................................................................. 6 2. Coverage of Source Types 7 2.1 Serial Source Types ..................................................................................................................................................... 7 Journals ..................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Trade journals .......................................................................................................................................................... 7 Book series ............................................................................................................................................................... 7 Conference material ................................................................................................................................................ 8 2.2 Non-serial sources .....................................................................................................................................................10 -
Boys 2 Full Report (PDF)
1 Page No Contents Acknowledgements 2 Background 3 Aims of the project 3 Section 1: Systematic review of the area 5 Section 2: Workshops with professionals 5 Section 3: File-based information on the sample 8 Section 4: Interviews with the young men within the sample 11 Section 5: Quantitative analysis of identified problems 37 Discussion points from the previous sections 44 Final Summary 53 References 55 Appendix A: Literature review 56 Appendix B: Training days summary 104 Appendix C: Pen portraits of the young people 105 Appendix D: Interview schedule 117 Appendix E: Themes chart 119 2 Acknowledgements The Boys 2 Research Project was a one-year project funded by the Home Office. The purpose of the project was to work alongside boys and young men impacted by child sexual exploitation (CSE) to improve identification, assessment and intervention of this largely hidden group. Alongside boys and young men, we developed standardised assessment tools and intervention resources for front line professionals to support boys and young men to cope and recover from CSE. We would wish to extend our appreciation to the Home Office in enabling us to undertake this research project. This resource could not have been developed without the energy and enthusiasm of all those involved. In particular, we would like to thank all the boys and young men who participated in the research and the schools and front line professionals that supported us in working with them to make this resource possible. We would also like to thank Sue Thurman for her support with ensuring the needs of boys and young men with additional learning needs were included. -
ACTION to END CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE and EXPLOITATION: a REVIEW of the EVIDENCE • 2020 About the Authors
ACTION TO END CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE AND EXPLOITATION: A REVIEW OF THE EVIDENCE • 2020 About the authors Lorraine Radford is Emeritus Professor of Social Policy and Social Work at the University of Central Lancashire, UK; Debbie Allnock is Senior Research Fellow at the International Centre, University of Bedfordshire, UK; Patricia Hynes is Reader in Forced Migration in the School of Applied Social Sciences, University of Bedfordshire, UK; Sarah Shorrock is Research Officer at the Institute of Citizenship, Society & Change at the University of Central Lancashire, UK This publication has been produced with financial support from the End Violence Fund. However, the opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of the End Violence Fund. Suggested citation: United Nations Children’s Fund (2020) Action to end child sexual abuse and exploitation: A review of the evidence, UNICEF, New York Published by UNICEF Child Protection Section Programme Division 3 United Nations Plaza New York, NY 10017 Email: [email protected] Website: www.unicef.org © United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) December 2020. Permission is required to reproduce any part of this publication. Permission will be freely granted to educational or non-profit organizations. For more information on usage rights, please contact: [email protected] Cover Photo: © UNICEF/UNI328273/Viet Hung ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This evidence review was commissioned by UNICEF to support Hanna Tiefengraber, Associate Expert, UNODC; Catherine -
CICAS: Toward a Critical Framework of Information Literacy in Addiction Science
Please do not remove this page CICAS: Toward a critical framework of information literacy in Addiction Science Bejarano, William; Ward, Judit Hajnal https://scholarship.libraries.rutgers.edu/discovery/delivery/01RUT_INST:ResearchRepository/12643430900004646?l#13643522700004646 Bejarano, W., & Ward, J. H. (2016). CICAS: Toward a critical framework of information literacy in Addiction Science. In Substance Abuse Library and Information Studies (Vol. 3, Issue 1, pp. 33–41). Rutgers University. https://doi.org/10.7282/T37M0B9N This work is protected by copyright. You are free to use this resource, with proper attribution, for research and educational purposes. Other uses, such as reproduction or publication, may require the permission of the copyright holder. Downloaded On 2021/09/30 13:31:45 -0400 Substance Abuse Library and Information Studies: Proceedings of the 38th Annual SALIS / AMHL Conference CICAS: Toward a critical framework of information literacy in Addiction Science William Bejarano Center of Alcohol Studies Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey Judit H. Ward Center of Alcohol Studies Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey Abstract This paper is an attempt to suggest a critical framework for addiction information literacy. Since the ACRL information literacy standards were updated in 2015, our field is in need of guidelines about how to translate its general principles to meet the special needs of our diverse audiences. The authors wish to identify the unique application of the ACRL standards to the field of addiction science. An applied and transdisciplinary science requires a particular emphasis on evaluating sources and a special regard for the sensitive nature of the information sought. -
Paths to Improving Engagement Among Racial and Ethnic Minorities in Addiction Health Services Erick G
Guerrero et al. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy (2015) 10:40 DOI 10.1186/s13011-015-0036-z RESEARCH Open Access Paths to improving engagement among racial and ethnic minorities in addiction health services Erick G. Guerrero1*, Karissa Fenwick1, Yinfei Kong1, Christine Grella2 and Thomas D’Aunno3 Abstract Background: Members of racial and ethnic minority groups are most likely to experience limited access and poor engagement in addiction treatment. Research has been limited on the role of program capacity and delivery of comprehensive care in improving access and retention among minorities with drug abuse issues. The goal of this study was to examine the extent to which access and retention are enhanced when racial and ethnic minorities receive care from high-capacity addiction health services (AHS) programs and via coordination with mental health and receipt of HIV testing services. Methods: This multilevel cross-sectional analysis involved data from 108 programs merged with client data from 2011 for 13,478 adults entering AHS. Multilevel negative binomial regression models were used to test interactions and indirect relationships between program capacity and days to enter treatment (wait time) and days in treatment (retention). Results: Compared to low-capacity programs and non-Latino and non-African American clients, Latinos and African Americans served in high-capacity programs reported shorter wait times to admission, as hypothesized. African Americans also had longer treatment retention in high-capacity programs. Receipt of HIV testing and program coordination of mental health services played an indirect role in the relationship between program capacity and wait time. Conclusions: Program capacity and coordinated services in AHS may reduce disparities in access to care.