List of Elected Officials

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

List of Elected Officials Wayne County Elected Officials State Officials Governor Statewide Eric Holcomb Rep Lt. Governor Statewide Suzanne Crouch Rep Attorney General Statewide Todd Rokita Rep US Senator Statewide Mike Braun Rep US Senator Statewide Todd Young Rep Secretary of State Statewide Holli Sullivan Rep Auditor of State Statewide Tera Klutz Rep Treasurer of State Statewide Kelly Mitchell Rep US Representative District 6 Greg Pence Rep State Senator District 27 Jeff Raatz Rep State Representative District 54 Tom Saunders Rep State Representative District 56 Brad Barrett Rep Judge of Circuit Court 17th Circuit April Drake Rep Judge of Superior Court Superior Court I Charles “Chuck” Todd Rep Superior Court II Greg Horn Rep Superior Court III Darrin Dolehanty Rep Prosecuting Attorney 17th Circuit Mike Shipman Rep Wayne County Officials Auditor Kimberly Walton Rep Clerk of Courts Debra Berry Rep Coroner Kevin Fouche Rep Recorder Debbie Tiemann Rep Sheriff Randy Retter Rep Surveyor Gordon Moore Rep Treasurer Nancy Funk Rep Assessor Tim Smith Rep Wayne Twp-Assessor Gary Callahan Rep Commissioner-District 1 Kenneth E Paust Rep Commissioner-District 2 Mary Ann Butters Rep Commissioner-District 3 Jeff Plasterer Rep Wayne County Council Officials County Council-District 1 Robert (Bob) Chamness Rep County Council-District 2 Rodger Smith Rep County Council-District 3 Beth Leisure Rep County Council-District 4 Tony Gillam Rep County Council At-Large Max Smith Rep County Council At-Large Cathy Williams Rep County Council At-Large Gerald (Gary) Saunders Rep Wayne County Trustee Abington-Trustee Chelsie R Buchanan Rep Boston-Trustee Sandra K Nocton Rep Center-Trustee Vicki Chasteen Rep Clay-Trustee Rebecca L Cool Rep Dalton-Trustee Lance A. Lumpkin Rep Franklin-Trustee John Roll Rep Greene-Trustee Robert D. Conyers Rep Harrison-Trustee James T. Fagan Rep Jackson-Trustee Lyndon Wicker Rep Jefferson-Trustee Joe P Smith Rep New Garden-Trustee Jeff Himelick Rep Perry-Trustee Dan Hollenberg Rep Washington-Trustee Kenneth Risch Rep Wayne-Trustee Susan Isaacs Rep Webster-Trustee George Haskett Rep Wayne County Township Board Abington Doug Toschlog Rep Theresa Clark Rep Malinda Glover Rep Boston Jack Buckland Rep Pat Ravinet Rep Todd Lafuse Rep Center Steve Poindexter Rep Jodi Frech Rep Shari Markley Rep Clay Jan A. Riggleman Rep Louis P Artman, Jr. Rep Cheryl Heacox Liber Dalton James D. Howell Rep Bill Sullivan Rep Larry J. Black Rep Franklin Dale A. Spencer Rep Scott Stemple Rep Don Berger Rep Greene Alex Nocton Rep Steve Nocton Rep Benjamin Jon Alyea Rep Harrison Sara Jane Moyer Rep David Bertsch Rep Tim Arnold Rep Jackson Judith Kerney Rep Bradley R. Bowman Rep Gil Kerney Rep Jefferson Everett Hampton Rep Max Soliday Rep Mark Linderman Rep New Garden Jacquelyn Shroyer Rep Eric Davis Rep Robert E. McGuire Dem Perry Bruce Oesterling Rep Daniel Dale Kirtley Rep Randall Hunnicutt Rep Washington Don Wampler Rep Kenneth Bertsch Dem Allen Wampler Rep Wayne Diane Dwyer Blackwell Rep Terri E Smith Rep Marilyn Sowers Rep Webster Ronald Coldiron Rep Sandra Haskett Rep Amy Fouche Rep Richmond Elected Officials Mayor Dave Snow Dem City Clerk Karen S. Chasteen Dem Common Council District 1 Doug Goss Dem Common Council District 2 Kelley Cruse-Nicholson Dem Common Council District 3 Bill Engle Dem Common Council District 4 Jeff Cappa Rep Common Council District 5 Jeff Locke Dem Common Council District 6 Gary Turner Rep Common Council At-Large Jane E. Bumbalough Rep At-Large Ronald (Ron) M. Oler Rep At-Large Larry Parker Rep Small Town Elected Officials BOSTON Clerk-Treasurer Harriett Marquis Town Council At-Large Cheryl Wright Indep At-Large Nick Ramsey Indep At-Large Amber Ramsey Indep CAMBRIDGE CITY Clerk-Treasurer Sherry Ervin Indep Ward 1 Michael Amick Indep Ward 2 Debbie McGinley Indep Ward 3 Jeff Mardis Rep Ward 4 Nathan Riggs Indep Ward 5 Steven W. Sorah Rep Centerville Clerk-Treasurer Susan E. Dillman Rep Town Council Ward 1 James Bullen Rep Ward 2 Gary L. Holbert Dem Ward 3 Daniel Wandersee Rep Ward 4 Jack Bodiker Dem Ward 5 Mark A. Tucker Rep Dublin Clerk-Treasurer Julia (Juli) McCarty Indep Town Council At-Large Pamela Chaney Rep At-Large Rex A. Snyder Indep At-Large Bob Gabbard Rep At-Large Nathan Ulerick Rep At-Large Bruce Moles Indep East Germantown Clerk-Treasurer Carleene Collins Dem Town Council At-Large Ronald Lammott Rep At-Large Doug Harris Rep At-Large Philip D. McQueen Rep At-Large Steve Mills Rep At-Large Donald Fisher Dem Economy Clerk-Treasurer Barbara Irvin Rep Town Council Michelle Bunger Rep Jim Lewis Rep Shirley Williams Rep Fountain City Clerk-Treasurer Trina McGuire Dem Town Council At-Large Steven Clark Rep At-Large Laurie Ann Hayes Dem At-Large Jesse R. Yandi Rep At-Large Cecil Mullins Dem At-Large Shane Shroyer Rep Greens Fork Clerk-Treasurer Brenda Brown Rep At-Large Richard Edward Stewart Rep At-Large Cathy Campbell Rep At-Large Buddy Strunk Dem Hagerstown Town Judge Susan Bell Lib Clerk-Treasurer Julie Jane Neal Rep Town Clerk At-Large Brian Longbons Rep At-Large Donald Benedict Rep At-Large Rebecca (Becky) Diericks Rep At-Large Fredrick (Fred) L. Dill Rep At-Large Allan Bullock Rep Milton Clerk-Treasurer Terry Craig Rep Town Council At-Large John R. Noland Rep At-Large Robert Simon Dem At-Large Phillip Allen Edwards Rep At-Large Ryan Coby Lib At-Large Hugh D. Payne Jr. Rep Spring Grove Clerk-Treasurer Town Council At-Large At-Large Robert Erbse At-Large Doug Brenneke At-Large Annemarie Chasteen At-Large Jerry Catron Whitewater Clerk-Treasurer Mary Jenkins Town Council At-Large Tim Williams At-Large Eric Brittenham At-Large Dean Mills At-Large Dylan Perkins At-Large Bill Jenkins Mt. Auburn Clerk-Treasurer Kimberly Owens Rep Town Council Tom Lee Dem.
Recommended publications
  • Simultaneous Cabinet Further Transformation In
    6 SIMULTANEOUS CABINET Monday 13 November 2017 FURTHER TRANSFORMATION IN EAST SUFFOLK (REP1629) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. Suffolk Coastal District Council and Waveney District Council agreed in January 2017 to create a new Council for east Suffolk. This was preceded by an intensive period of public consultation in November 2016, the results of which demonstrated that the majority of residents were in favour of one district Council in east Suffolk. 2. The decision to create a new Council for east Suffolk was both ambitious and ground breaking. A “super district” Council will be formed which will be the largest in England in terms of population. The creation of a new Council follows the successful legacy of both Councils working closely together for many years. Officers of all levels of seniority are shared, a joint Business Plan has been adopted and other key policies such as the Housing Strategy are shared. The Councils already share one website under the “East Suffolk” banner and Councillors from both authorities have attended meetings of each Council’s Cabinets since 2010. Cabinet portfolios are aligned and members have shared representation on various outside bodies. 3. The creation of a new Council will be a model other authorities follow as they decide how best to grapple with the significant challenges facing local government. Councils need to be of a scale large enough to face these challenges by having a loud enough voice, a strong bargaining position, a healthy balance sheet and a resilient workforce, yet small enough to feel connected to their residents. The creation of the new Council for east Suffolk will strike that balance.
    [Show full text]
  • Election Division Presidential Electors Faqs and Roster of Electors, 1816
    Election Division Presidential Electors FAQ Q1: How many presidential electors does Indiana have? What determines this number? Indiana currently has 11 presidential electors. Article 2, Section 1, Clause 2 of the Constitution of the United States provides that each state shall appoint a number of electors equal to the number of Senators or Representatives to which the state is entitled in Congress. Since Indiana has currently has 9 U.S. Representatives and 2 U.S. Senators, the state is entitled to 11 electors. Q2: What are the requirements to serve as a presidential elector in Indiana? The requirements are set forth in the Constitution of the United States. Article 2, Section 1, Clause 2 provides that "no Senator or Representative, or person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector." Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment also states that "No person shall be... elector of President or Vice-President... who, having previously taken an oath... to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. Congress may be a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability." These requirements are included in state law at Indiana Code 3-8-1-6(b). Q3: How does a person become a candidate to be chosen as a presidential elector in Indiana? Three political parties (Democratic, Libertarian, and Republican) have their presidential and vice- presidential candidates placed on Indiana ballots after their party's national convention.
    [Show full text]
  • May 29, 2019 by First Class Mail and Email (Taina.Edlund@Irscounsel
    May 29, 2019 President David Damschen, UT Executive Committee By First Class Mail and Email ([email protected]) Duane Davidson, WA Michael Frerichs, IL Deborah Goldberg, MA Seth Magaziner, RI Catherine Hughes Steve McCoy, GA Vicki Judson Kelly MItchell, IN Beth Pearce, VT Janine Cook Tobias Read, OR Taina Edlund Department of the Treasury Executive Director Internal Revenue Service Shaun Snyder 1111 Constitution Avenue NW 701 Eighth Street, NW Room 4300 Suite 540 Washington, DC 20224 Washington, DC 20001 (202) 347-3865 Re: Proposed Regulation Comments for Section 529A ((CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG-102837- www.NAST.org 15)) To the Internal Revenue Service: The National Association of State Treasurer’s (NAST) ABLE Committee appreciates this opportunity to comment on the proposed regulations under Section 529A of the Internal Revenue Code that provide guidance regarding the Achieving a Better Life Experience (ABLE) Act of 2014 (the “Proposed Regulations”). We realize that the initial comment period ended on September 21, 2015; however, we understand that comments are still being accepted. With several years of collective administration of ABLE programs, states have now gained operational experience that has in turn provided insight into how the Proposed Regulations can be improved. The Problem Despite 41 states and the District of Columbia offering ABLE programs, the rate of ABLE account openings has been slow industry wide. While there are many causes for this, we believe part of the problem is that not all potential ABLE account owners have a parent, guardian, or power of attorney who can or who is willing to serve as an “authorized legal representative” and assist them in opening and maintaining an account.
    [Show full text]
  • HPI Analysis: Rokita's Senate Edge
    V23, N15 Tuesday, Nov. 28, 2017 HPI Analysis: Rokita’s Senate edge While no one has GOP race locked up, Rokita is closer than many might think By MARK SOUDER FORT WAYNE – Obviously, Congressman Todd Rokita has not locked up the Republican nomination for Senate yet, but he is closer than most think. It is no surprise that Rokita has a significant early lead. He has twice run and won statewide for secretary of state, as well as serving as a congressman. Rokita’s district, like that of his fellow Wabash College graduate, Congressman Luke Messer, includes important parts of the Indianapolis metro area (the U.S. Rep. Todd Rokita brandishing his “defeat the elite” campaign at the State- heavily Republican donut). In a statewide Repub- house last summer. (HPI Photo by Brian A. Howey) lican primary election, the Indianapolis metro area dominates. received publicity in the Indianapolis market over mul- As media fragments, the difficulty of establish- tiple years is critical. Beyond that, in addition to Rokita’s ing name identification exponentially increases. The fact secretary of state advertising and statewide travels, he that Rokita and Messer have purchased advertising and Continued on page 3 Tax reform, Reagan style By BRIAN A. HOWEY NASHVILLE, Ind. – Step aboard Howey’s Way Back Machine to 1985 and 1986, when it was morning in America and President Ronald Reagan wielded moral authority and an ability for cutting deals to achieve great “We will use a healthy dialogue outcomes. The Way Back Machine with the people of Indiana to reveals that the Tax Reform Act of 1986, which simplified the form the basis for proposals we income tax code, broadened the will be advancing during the 2018 tax base and eliminated many tax shelters, was sponsored by General Assembly and beyond.” Democrats Richard Gephardt in - House Minority Leader the House and Bill Bradley in the Senate.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Councils in England by Type
    List of councils in England by type There are a total of 353 councils in England: Metropolitan districts (36) London boroughs (32) plus the City of London Unitary authorities (55) plus the Isles of Scilly County councils (27) District councils (201) Metropolitan districts (36) 1. Barnsley Borough Council 19. Rochdale Borough Council 2. Birmingham City Council 20. Rotherham Borough Council 3. Bolton Borough Council 21. South Tyneside Borough Council 4. Bradford City Council 22. Salford City Council 5. Bury Borough Council 23. Sandwell Borough Council 6. Calderdale Borough Council 24. Sefton Borough Council 7. Coventry City Council 25. Sheffield City Council 8. Doncaster Borough Council 26. Solihull Borough Council 9. Dudley Borough Council 27. St Helens Borough Council 10. Gateshead Borough Council 28. Stockport Borough Council 11. Kirklees Borough Council 29. Sunderland City Council 12. Knowsley Borough Council 30. Tameside Borough Council 13. Leeds City Council 31. Trafford Borough Council 14. Liverpool City Council 32. Wakefield City Council 15. Manchester City Council 33. Walsall Borough Council 16. North Tyneside Borough Council 34. Wigan Borough Council 17. Newcastle Upon Tyne City Council 35. Wirral Borough Council 18. Oldham Borough Council 36. Wolverhampton City Council London boroughs (32) 1. Barking and Dagenham 17. Hounslow 2. Barnet 18. Islington 3. Bexley 19. Kensington and Chelsea 4. Brent 20. Kingston upon Thames 5. Bromley 21. Lambeth 6. Camden 22. Lewisham 7. Croydon 23. Merton 8. Ealing 24. Newham 9. Enfield 25. Redbridge 10. Greenwich 26. Richmond upon Thames 11. Hackney 27. Southwark 12. Hammersmith and Fulham 28. Sutton 13. Haringey 29. Tower Hamlets 14.
    [Show full text]
  • Written Evidence Submitted by East Sussex County Council [ASC 021]
    Written evidence submitted by East Sussex County Council [ASC 021] • How has Covid-19 changed the landscape for long-term funding reform of the adult social care sector? The challenges facing the adult social care market prior to the pandemic are well documented and, in many cases, have been brought into sharp focus over the last 12 months. Local Authority published rates; contract arrangements (e.g. block arrangements); commissioning approaches (e.g. strategic partners) and CCG funding agreements including Better Care Fund allocations are all key funding reform considerations which sit alongside the necessity to offer choice, personalised care and high quality, safe services. Residential and nursing care There are 306 registered care homes in East Sussex – the majority are small independently run homes, which don’t have the wrap-around organisational infrastructure enjoyed by larger / national providers. In East Sussex, Local Authority placements are made across around one-third of the residential and nursing care market. At the peak of the second wave over 100 care homes in East Sussex were closed to admissions due to Covid outbreaks. Week commencing 04/01/21 there were 853 confirmed cases of Covid19 in East Sussex care home settings. During 2021, as of the week ending 19/03/2021, East Sussex has had 2,404 deaths registered in total and 1,110 of these have been attributable to COVID-19, of which 597 have occurred in hospital and 436 have occurred in care homes (LG reform data). In the two years up to April 2019, there were 26 residential and nursing home closures in East Sussex resulting in a loss of 435 beds, across all care groups.
    [Show full text]
  • NAST Letter to the Congressional Military Family Caucus 7.21.20
    July 21, 2020 Congressional Military Family Caucus Representative Sanford Bishop Representative Cathy McMorris Rodgers 2407 Rayburn HOB 1035 Longworth HOB Washington, D.C. 20515 Washington, D.C. 20515 President Deborah Goldberg, MA Dear Rep. Bishop and Rep. McMorris Rodgers: Executive Committee Henry Beck, ME As we celebrate the 30th Anniversary of the passage of the Americans with Disabilities Act David Damschen, UT Tim Eichenberg, NM (ADA), we can be proud of its positive impact on veterans with disabilities, while acknowledging Michael Frerichs, IL that there is much left to do. Dennis Milligan, AR Kelly Mitchell, IN The main purpose of the ADA is to provide people with disabilities equality of opportunity, full Shawn Wooden, CT participation in society, independent living, and economic self-sufficiency. But for more than two Executive Director decades after its passage, economic self-sufficiency was impossible for some. People with Shaun Snyder disabilities who need government benefits in order to live independently were blocked from saving 1201 Pennsylvania Ave, NW money. Without savings, economic self-sufficiency is unattainable. And without being able to Suite 800 fully participate in the economy, the other goals will not be fully realized. Washington, DC 20004 When the Achieving a Better Life Experience (ABLE) Act was passed into law in 2014, many www.NAST.org Americans with disabilities were empowered to save their own money to help pay for their disability expenses without fear of losing federal and state benefits. The Act was a meaningful step forward for people with disabilities. However, it came up short. After more than five years, and on the 30th birthday of the ADA, millions of Americans with disabilities, including veterans, still remain ineligible to open an ABLE account simply because they acquired their disability after they turned 26 years old.
    [Show full text]
  • IPPR | Empowering Counties: Unlocking County Devolution Deals ABOUT the AUTHORS
    REPORT EMPOWERING COUNTIES UNLOCKING COUNTY DEVOLUTION DEALS Ed Cox and Jack Hunter November 2015 © IPPR 2015 Institute for Public Policy Research ABOUT IPPR IPPR, the Institute for Public Policy Research, is the UK’s leading progressive thinktank. We are an independent charitable organisation with more than 40 staff members, paid interns and visiting fellows. Our main office is in London, with IPPR North, IPPR’s dedicated thinktank for the North of England, operating out of offices in Newcastle and Manchester. The purpose of our work is to conduct and publish the results of research into and promote public education in the economic, social and political sciences, and in science and technology, including the effect of moral, social, political and scientific factors on public policy and on the living standards of all sections of the community. IPPR 4th Floor 14 Buckingham Street London WC2N 6DF T: +44 (0)20 7470 6100 E: [email protected] www.ippr.org Registered charity no. 800065 This paper was first published in November 2015. © 2015 The contents and opinions in this paper are the authors ’ only. POSITIVE IDEAS for CHANGE CONTENTS Summary ............................................................................................................3 1. Devolution unleashed .....................................................................................9 2. Why devolve to counties? ............................................................................11 2.1 Counties and their economic opportunities ...................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 985 EDUCATION (2) That the Revised Estimates Of
    985 EDUCATION (Note: This report was presented to the Council at its meeting on \2th Decem­ ber, 1952.) EDUCATION COMMITTEE: 4th December, 1952. Present: Councillors Brown (in the Chair), Adkins, Alien, J.P., Bailey, A. C. L. Bishop, Buckle, Collins, Duff, Gange, J.P., Leigh, J.P., C.C., Lovell, MacRae, Mason, Mrs. Milner and Sheldrake (Representative members); Messrs. F. W. Coppin and C. A. Lillingston, Rev. H. Eland Stewart, and Miss D. E. Hunt (Co-opted members); Mr. J. Barrow, C.C. (Appointed member); Mr. J. Rostron, Miss A. Robinson and Miss D. E. Ross (Members of the Youth Sub-Committee). PART I.—RECOMMENDATIONS. RECOMMENDATION I: Education Estimates of Capital Expenditure for the Year 1953/54. Your Committee has considered, and is in agreement with, recommendation I of the report of its General Purposes and Finance Sub-Committee of 4th December, 1952, relating to capital expenditure for the financial year 1953/54, details of which are set out in paragraph 61 (2nd December, 1952) of the report of the (Education) Sites and Buildings Sub-Committee. Resolved to RECOMMEND: That a resolution in the following terms be passed by the Council: That the items included in the estimates of capital expenditure, amounting to £52,365, for the financial year 1953/54, in accordance with the details now submitted, be approved and submitted to the Middlesex County Council. RECOMMENDATION II: Education Estimates on Revenue Account for the Years 1952/53 and 1953/54. Your Committee has considered, and is in agreement with, recommendation II of the report of its General Purposes and Finance Sub-Committee of 4th December, 1952, relating to the approval of estimates of income and expendi­ ture on revenue account for the financial year 1953/54, and revised estimates for 1952/53.
    [Show full text]
  • Norfolk Southern Corporation Contributions to Candidates and Political Committees January 1 ‐ December 31, 2017*
    NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION CONTRIBUTIONS TO CANDIDATES AND POLITICAL COMMITTEES JANUARY 1 ‐ DECEMBER 31, 2017* STATE RECIPIENT OF CORPORATE POLITICAL FUNDS AMOUNT DATE ELECTION OFFICE OR COMMITTEE TYPE LA John Bel Edwards$ 4,000 2/6/2017 Primary 2019 Governor DE DE Dem Party (State Acct)$ 1,000 3/1/2017 Election Cycle 2018 State Party Cmte DE DE Rep Party (State Acct)$ 1,000 3/1/2017 Election Cycle 2018 State Party Cmte US Democratic Governors Association (DGA)$ 10,000 3/1/2017 N/A 2017 Association DE Earl Jaques$ 300 3/1/2017 General 2018 State House DE Edward Osienski$ 300 3/1/2017 General 2018 State House SC Henry McMaster$ 1,000 3/1/2017 Primary 2018 Governor DE James Johnson$ 300 3/1/2017 General 2018 State House DE John Kowalko$ 300 3/1/2017 General 2018 State House DE John Viola$ 300 3/1/2017 General 2018 State House DE Margaret Rose Henry$ 300 3/1/2017 Primary 2018 State Senate DE Mike Mulrooney$ 300 3/1/2017 General 2018 State House DE Nicole Poore$ 300 3/1/2017 Primary 2020 State Senate US Republican Governors Association (RGA)$ 10,000 3/1/2017 N/A 2017 Association SC SC Rep House Caucus/Cmte$ 3,500 3/1/2017 N/A 2017 State Party Cmte SC SC Rep Senate Caucus$ 3,500 3/1/2017 N/A 2017 State Party Cmte DE SENR PAC$ 300 3/1/2017 N/A 2017 State PAC DE Stephanie Hansen$ 300 3/1/2017 Primary 2018 State Senate DE Valerie Longhurst$ 300 3/1/2017 General 2018 State House AL AL Rep House Caucus$ 1,500 3/24/2017 N/A 2017 State Party Cmte MS Percy Bland$ 250 4/26/2017 General 2017 Mayor SC SC Dem House Caucus/Cmte$ 1,000 4/26/2017 N/A 2017
    [Show full text]
  • Blaenau Gwent County Borough Council Bridgend County Borough Council Caerphilly County Borough Council the City of Cardiff Counc
    Welsh Local Authorities gritting information (alphabetical order) Blaenau Gwent Info and map of http://www.blaenau-gwent.gov.uk/resident/highways- County Borough gritting routes cleansing/winter-gritting/winter-gritting-routes-salt-bins/ Council http://www.blaenau- gwent.gov.uk/resident/emergencies-crime- prevention/preparing-for-winter/ Bridgend County Info and map of http://www.bridgend.gov.uk/winter.aspx Borough Council gritting routes http://www.bridgend.gov.uk/services/highways.aspx Caerphilly County Info and map of http://www.caerphilly.gov.uk/Services/Roads-and- Borough Council gritting routes pavements/Gritting-and-snow-clearing/Winter-Service- Plan http://www.news.wales/south/caerphilly-county- borough-council/caerphilly-council-is-monitoring- weather-conditions-2017-01-25740.html The City of Cardiff Info and map of https://www.cardiff.gov.uk/ENG/resident/Parking-roads- Council gritting routes and-travel/Winter-maintenance/Pages/Winter- Location of salt maintenance.aspx bins https://www.cardiff.gov.uk/ENG/resident/Community- safety/Severe-winter- weather/Documents/winter%20weather%20guide.pdf Carmarthenshire Info and map of http://www.carmarthenshire.gov.wales/home/residents/t County Council gritting routes ravel-roads-parking/gritting/#.WH4UVk1DT9Q Twitter https://twitter.com/CarmsCouncil/status/7992671481998 25409 Ceredigion County Info and map of https://www.ceredigion.gov.uk/English/Resident/Travel- Council gritting routes Roads-Parking/Highways-During- Twitter Winter/Pages/default.aspx https://www.ceredigion.gov.uk/English/Resident/Travel-
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 General Election Report by IBRG (Update15)
    A report to supporters and members of Indiana Business for Responsive Government (IBRG), the Indiana Chamber of Commerce, and allied organizations. This report will be updated as additional election results are received in the hours and days following. Tumultuous Political Environment Nets Solid Election Wins Indiana Business for Responsive Government (IBRG), the non-partisan political action program of the Indiana Chamber of Commerce, scored a very successful general election. 70 of 74 IBRG- endorsed candidates facing opposition were victorious. Twenty-one (21) additional endorsed candidates did not face general election challenges. Considerable excitement and upheaval in the Indiana electorate this mid-term election certainly created rough waves and realignments around the state. However, in the end there were few ultimate changes in the political status quo for both candidates and seats held by the parties. Republicans swept all statewide races by significant margins, led by an unexpectedly large double-digit margin victory by Mike Braun for the U.S. Senate seat. In the General Assembly, Republican majorities took a relatively modest hit, but not enough to lose super-majority status. In the House, three (3) incumbent GOP legislators were defeated, resulting in a net breakdown of a 67-33 GOP majority. In the Senate, the Republican super-majority was reduced by just one seat to 40-10 with the defeat of notorious Sen. Mike Delph (R-Carmel). Although the final tally changed little, the Senate battlefield was intense and involved more competitive races than seen in the last decade. It’s very hard to look at the 2018 midterms in Indiana state legislative races as a “status quo” election, even though the number of seats changing was minimal.
    [Show full text]