DOCSLIB.ORG

COSEWIC Annual Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
COSEWIC Annual Report COMMITTEE ON THE COMITÉ SUR LA SITUATION STATUS OF ENDANGERED DES ESPÈCES EN PÉRIL WILDLIFE IN CANADA AU CANADA ANNUAL REPORT TO THE CANADIAN ENDANGERED SPECIES CONSERVATION COUNCIL (CESCC) MAY 2003 COMMITTEE ON THE STATUS OF ENDANGERED WILDLIFE IN CANADA (COSEWIC) MARCO FESTA-BIANCHET CHAIR 1 PREFACE COSEWIC was given its mandate in 1976 by recommendation 6 of the 40th Federal- Provincial Wildlife Conference. In June, 1988, the Canadian Wildlife Directors directed COSEWIC to report to their Committee. In March 1999 the Canadian Endangered Species Conservation Council (CESCC) released new Terms of Reference for COSEWIC. COSEWIC determines the status in Canada of wildlife species whose future may be in doubt and releases to the public the information upon which the designation of status is based. The twenty-sixth annual report of the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada is herein provided to you, the Canadian Wildlife Directors’ Committee, for your review and comment. ----- ----- ----- 2 PART 1 November 25-29, 2002 meeting General Information The fall, 2002, meeting of COSEWIC took place at the Cartier Place Suite Hotel, Ottawa, Ontario, chaired by Dr. Marco Festa-Bianchet. All members were in attendance. World Wildlife Fund Canada, Canadian Nature Federation and Canadian Wildlife Federation attended the meeting as continuing observers. Workshop/Presentation/Special Meeting On November 25 during the afternoon a Workshop entitled “Approaches to Status Assignments Below the Species Level” took place. All members were in attendance as well as a number of observers. Several presentations were made by members and invited guest speakers. On November 26 in the evening, a meeting took place between members of COSEWIC as well as some observers at the Species Assessment Meeting, Lynda Maltby, director of the Species at Risk Branch of the Canadian Wildlife Service and two representatives of the Canadian Wildlife Directors’ Committee (CWDC), Bruce Morgan, British Columbia and Steve Bowcott, Ontario. Marco Festa-Bianchet, chair of COSEWIC, was invited to attend part of a meeting of the CWDC during the week of February 10, 2003 in Victoria, British Columbia, to address mutual concerns with the CWDC as well as other issues which arose during the course of the Species Assessment Meeting held that week. On November 27 in the evening, members/observers attended an interesting and informative presentation by Steve Carr on the “Use of Molecular Genetics to Identify Taxonomic Units”. Approval of Changes to Membership It was decided that following public calls for membership in Species Specialist Subcommittees (with the exception, of course, of co-chairs) renewals/new member selections will be recorded in the minutes of the Co-chairs Subcommittee meeting and that it was not necessary for these changes to be provided to the full committee. Note: A reallocation of responsibilities for the Plants & Lichens Specialist Subcommittee was announced. Erich Haber will be responsible for all vascular plants and René Belland will not only handle mosses but will also be responsible for lichens. The following committee members were recommended for approval for a four-year term effective January 1, 2003: 3 Species Specialist Subcommittee co-chairs Following a public call for members and submission by the chairs of Selection Committees of top candidates where there were more than one applicant, the members voted either by e-mail or at the full committee meeting with the following results: Marty Leonard is the new co-chair of the Birds Specialist Subcommittee. Gerry Mackie, renewed as co-chair for Molluscs of the Lepidopterans & Molluscs Specialist Subcommittee Ron Brooks, renewed as co-chair of the Amphibians & Reptiles Specialist Subcommittee. Non-government Member Steve Carr, renewed. Jurisdictional Members Juanita Ptolemy, new alternate from British Columbia. Gilles Seutin (formerly alternate), now member from Parks Canada. Earl Wiltse, (member from Saskatchewan) announced he will no longer be the member. Irene Bowman announced that she will be retiring from Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, and as COSEWIC member from Ontario). The above membership changes/renewals are herein submitted for your recommendation to the Canadian Endangered Species Conservation Council (CESCC). A schedule of renewal dates for jurisdictional members was circulated and Marco stated that this process needs to be clearly defined. Organization and Procedures Manual - Version # 17 • Steve Brechtel, outgoing chair of the Organization & Procedures Manual Working Group attended to present this version. Marco thanked Steve for his hard work and dedication to this task. The members of the working group, Michael Bradstreet, Ron Brooks, Joe Brazil and Ruben Boles, were also thanked. • Steve stated that the working group built on the work of many people, first Bob Campbell and then Theresa Fowler and for two and a half years tried to pull together existing practice, make improvements and put together a cohesive text. • Steve recommended that a permanent subcommittee be set up with least one jurisdictional member, one co-chair and one non-government member and someone from the Secretariat as ex officio allowing the manual to continue to evolve without taking up too much time at future meetings. • Michael Bradstreet was chosen as chair of the Organization & Procedures Manual Subcommittee which will include the following members: Ron Brooks, Jake Rice, Siu-Ling Han, Lynda Maltby and someone from the Secretariat as ex officio. • The subcommittee was charged to begin working under its Terms of Reference to monitor operations and procedures of COSEWIC, identify opportunities to improve efficiency and/or compliance with appropriate guidelines and policies and propose changes as appropriate. Terms of Reference for COSEWIC 4 Some modifications to the Terms of Reference (ToR) were discussed and a further draft of the revised ToR was circulated after the meeting for review/comment by members. Reports from Existing Ad Hoc Working Groups a) Instructions to Authors Working Group (WG) Gerry Mackie, chair, provided a revised draft for review along with eight motions which were approved. The WG will finish these Instructions for the spring, 2003 Species Assessment Meeting. b) Intellectual Property (IP) WG Ruben Boles gave a presentation on IP matters after which it was agreed that status reports will now undergo an additional step wherein the draft report will be revised by the report writer who will produce a “background report”. A second contract will then be issued, possibly to the same individual who wrote the draft report, to produce the interim report. c) Taxonomic Coverage within COSEWIC WG Gerry Mackie, chair, provided a report following which it was recommended that a new Species Specialist Subcommittee (SC) be added to COSEWIC resulting from the separation of the current Lepidopterans and Molluscs SC into Molluscs as one separate SC and Lepidopterans being included in a new SC for Arthropods. This will create one additional vote and two additional co-chairs. d) Guidelines for Data Deficient WG Following discussion, David Green was charged to provide by e-mail appropriate wording for further review/comment. New Ad Hoc Working Groups Established a) Template for Technical Summary WG David Green, chair and Gerry Mackie. b) Habitat and Threats WG Jake Rice, chair, Erich Haber, Gerry Mackie and Gina Schalk (Secretariat). It was suggested that this Working Group liaise with someone from the Recovery Secretariat as a succinct identification/reporting of threats is very important for recovery purposes. The Chair of COSEWIC and the Chair of RENEW (Lynda Maltby) are to meet to discuss how the two committees can better liaise. c) Designatable Units WG Gilles Seutin, Sherman Boates, Howard Powles, David Green, Suzanne Carrière, Jeff Hutchings, Mart Gross are to provide wording for the O & P Manual under guidelines for listing units below the species level. Marco suggested that this working group should liaise with the Ecozones Working Group. d) Ecozones WG 5 Bob Campbell, chair, Maureen Toner, Rosemary Curley, Howard Powles, Gilles Seutin, Tom Jung, Andrew Trites or Hal Whitehead, Gerry Mackie, someone from the Secretariat, Mart Gross (unsure). e) Criteria for Delisting WG Dave Fraser, chair, Lucie Métras, Al Dextrase, David Green, Sherman Boates. f) Long Term Planning WG Jim Duncan, chair, René Belland, Suzanne Carrière, Tom Jung, Dave Fraser, someone from Secretariat. Report from the Aboriginal Traditional Knowledge (ATK) Subcommittee. Henry Lickers, interim Co-chair of the ATK Subcommittee advised as follows: • There was a good meeting with the Aboriginal Working Group (AWG) • It was decided to retain the word “Recovery” in the ATK Terms of Reference (ToR) because native groups feel that recovery is very important. • The AWG is looking across the country for people to serve on the ATK Subcommittee. • They are also trying to decide who will be other co-chair. • They think it is a good idea to meet with the WMBs, COSEWIC and the Recovery Secretariat. • The AWG hope that by the next meeting, they will have people who can provide advice - contacts within each major ecozone of Canada. David Green added that reference to Recovery in the ToR of the ATK Subcommittee will allow them to obtain information about assessment and recovery all at once rather than contacting the elders twice). Emergency Assessments A request for an emergency status assignment for two populations of sockeye salmon.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wild Species 2010 the GENERAL STATUS of SPECIES in CANADA
    Wild Species 2010 THE GENERAL STATUS OF SPECIES IN CANADA Canadian Endangered Species Conservation Council National General Status Working Group This report is a product from the collaboration of all provincial and territorial governments in Canada, and of the federal government. Canadian Endangered Species Conservation Council (CESCC). 2011. Wild Species 2010: The General Status of Species in Canada. National General Status Working Group: 302 pp. Available in French under title: Espèces sauvages 2010: La situation générale des espèces au Canada. ii Abstract Wild Species 2010 is the third report of the series after 2000 and 2005. The aim of the Wild Species series is to provide an overview on which species occur in Canada, in which provinces, territories or ocean regions they occur, and what is their status. Each species assessed in this report received a rank among the following categories: Extinct (0.2), Extirpated (0.1), At Risk (1), May Be At Risk (2), Sensitive (3), Secure (4), Undetermined (5), Not Assessed (6), Exotic (7) or Accidental (8). In the 2010 report, 11 950 species were assessed. Many taxonomic groups that were first assessed in the previous Wild Species reports were reassessed, such as vascular plants, freshwater mussels, odonates, butterflies, crayfishes, amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals. Other taxonomic groups are assessed for the first time in the Wild Species 2010 report, namely lichens, mosses, spiders, predaceous diving beetles, ground beetles (including the reassessment of tiger beetles), lady beetles, bumblebees, black flies, horse flies, mosquitoes, and some selected macromoths. The overall results of this report show that the majority of Canada’s wild species are ranked Secure.
    [Show full text]
  • Ours to Save: the Distribution, Status & Conservation Needs of Canada's Endemic Species
    Ours to Save The distribution, status & conservation needs of Canada’s endemic species June 4, 2020 Version 1.0 Ours to Save: The distribution, status & conservation needs of Canada’s endemic species Additional information and updates to the report can be found at the project website: natureconservancy.ca/ourstosave Suggested citation: Enns, Amie, Dan Kraus and Andrea Hebb. 2020. Ours to save: the distribution, status and conservation needs of Canada’s endemic species. NatureServe Canada and Nature Conservancy of Canada. Report prepared by Amie Enns (NatureServe Canada) and Dan Kraus (Nature Conservancy of Canada). Mapping and analysis by Andrea Hebb (Nature Conservancy of Canada). Cover photo credits (l-r): Wood Bison, canadianosprey, iNaturalist; Yukon Draba, Sean Blaney, iNaturalist; Salt Marsh Copper, Colin Jones, iNaturalist About NatureServe Canada A registered Canadian charity, NatureServe Canada and its network of Canadian Conservation Data Centres (CDCs) work together and with other government and non-government organizations to develop, manage, and distribute authoritative knowledge regarding Canada’s plants, animals, and ecosystems. NatureServe Canada and the Canadian CDCs are members of the international NatureServe Network, spanning over 80 CDCs in the Americas. NatureServe Canada is the Canadian affiliate of NatureServe, based in Arlington, Virginia, which provides scientific and technical support to the international network. About the Nature Conservancy of Canada The Nature Conservancy of Canada (NCC) works to protect our country’s most precious natural places. Proudly Canadian, we empower people to safeguard the lands and waters that sustain life. Since 1962, NCC and its partners have helped to protect 14 million hectares (35 million acres), coast to coast to coast.
    [Show full text]
  • Endemic Genera of Bryophytes of North America (North of Mexico)
    Preslia, Praha, 76: 255–277, 2004 255 Endemic genera of bryophytes of North America (north of Mexico) Endemické rody mechorostů Severní Ameriky Wilfred Borden S c h o f i e l d Dedicated to the memory of Emil Hadač Department of Botany, University Boulevard 3529-6270, Vancouver B. C., Canada V6T 1Z4, e-mail: wilfs@interchange.ubc.ca Schofield W. B. (2004): Endemic genera of bryophytes of North America (north of Mexico). – Preslia, Praha, 76: 255–277. There are 20 endemic genera of mosses and three of liverworts in North America, north of Mexico. All are monotypic except Thelia, with three species. General ecology, reproduction, distribution and nomenclature are discussed for each genus. Distribution maps are provided. The Mexican as well as Neotropical genera of bryophytes are also noted without detailed discussion. K e y w o r d s : bryophytes, distribution, ecology, endemic, liverworts, mosses, reproduction, North America Introduction Endemism in bryophyte genera of North America (north of Mexico) appears not to have been discussed in detail previously. Only the mention of genera is included in Schofield (1980) with no detail presented. Distribution maps of several genera have appeared in scattered publications. The present paper provides distribution maps of all endemic bryophyte genera for the region and considers the biology and taxonomy of each. When compared to vascular plants, endemism in bryophyte genera in the region is low. There are 20 genera of mosses and three of liverworts. The moss families Andreaeobryaceae, Pseudoditrichaceae and Theliaceae and the liverwort family Gyrothyraceae are endemics; all are monotypic. A total of 16 families of mosses and three of liverworts that possess endemic genera are represented.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Evolution and Circumscription of the Neckeraceae (Musci)
    J. Hattori Bot. Lab. No. 76: 13- 20 (Oct. 1994) ON THE EVOLUTION AND CIRCUMSCRIPTION OF THE NECKERACEAE (MUSCI) JOHANNES ENROTH 1 ABSTRACT. The family Neckeraceae (Musci) contains the traditional subfamilies Neckeroideae and Thamnobryoideae ("Thamnioideae"). The family must be defined mainly on gametophyte characters, since the sporophytes display great plasticity. A few gametophyte characters critical in the definition of the Neckeraceae are pointed out. A list of the 23 genera provisionally accepted in the family is provided. The key word in understanding the evolution of the Neckeraceae is reduction, implying anatomical and morphological reduction in both generations. For example, the evolution of the peri­ stome shows a reduction series from the generalized perfect hypnoid type (e.g., Thamnobryum Nieuwl.) to various reduced "neckeroid" types (e.g., Neckera Hedw. and Neckeropsis Reichardt). Several primitive versus advanced character states in the gametophytes and sporophytes of neckera­ ceous mosses are briefly discussed. Hypnodendron (C. Mull.) Lindb. ex. Mitt. and Climacium Web. & Mohr. are provisionally recognized as outgroups. It is emphasized that the evolution of the two gener­ ations have not always progressed at same "rate", since there exist genera with a primitive gameto­ phyte and an advanced sporophyte, and vice versa. INTRODUCTION To understand the present-day expression of a given natural group of organisms, one must have a good comprehension of the group's evolutionary history. This paper presents, for the first time, ideas on the evolution and their bearing on the circumscription of the iso­ bryalian moss family Neckeraceae. The generic relationships within the Neckeraceae have not yet been cladistically scrutinized, and global revisions are wanting for some critical genera, such as Neckera Hedw., Porotrichum (Brid.) Hampe, Porotrichodendron Fleisch., and Thamnobryum Nieuwl.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Home and Native Land: Canadian Species of Global Conservation Concern
    Our Home and Native Land Canadian Species of Global Conservation Concern NatureServe Canada contributes to the conservation of Canada’s biodiversity by providing scientific data and expertise about species and ecosystems of conservation concern to support decision-making, research, and education. Citation: Cannings, S., M. Anions, R. Rainer, and B. Stein. 2005. Our Home and Native Land: Canadian Species of Global Conservation Concern. NatureServe Canada: Ottawa, Ontario. © NatureServe Canada 2005 ISBN 0-9711053-4-0 Primary funding for the publication of this report was provided by the Suncor Energy Foundation. This report is also available in French. To request a copy, please contact NatureServe Canada. NatureServe Canada 960 Carling Avenue Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0C6 613-759-1861 www.natureserve-canada.ca Our Home and Native Land Canadian Species of Global Conservation Concern by Sydney Cannings Marilyn F. E. Anions Rob Rainer Bruce A. Stein Sydney Cannings NatureServe Yukon Fish and Wildlife Branch Yukon Department of the Environment P.O. Box 2703 Whitehorse, Yukon Y1A 2C6 867-667-3684 Marilyn F. E. Anions NatureServe Canada 960 Carling Avenue Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0C6 Note on Captions: For each species, captions state the range in Canada only, as well as the NatureServe global conservation status. 613-759-1942 Rob Rainer Front Cover Chelsea, Québec Left to right: Steller sea lions (Eumetopias jubatus). Vulnerable (G3). 819-827-9082 British Columbia. / Photo by Jared Hobbs. Golden paintbrush (Castilleja levisecta). Critically imperiled (G1). British Bruce A. Stein, Ph.D. Columbia. / Photo by Leah Ramsay, British Columbia Conservation Data NatureServe Centre. 1101 Wilson Blvd., 15th Floor Spotted owl (Strix occidentalis).
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Species 2015 the GENERAL STATUS of SPECIES in CANADA
    Wild Species 2015 THE GENERAL STATUS OF SPECIES IN CANADA Canadian Endangered Species Conservation Council National General Status Working Group This report is a product from the collaboration of all provincial and territorial governments in Canada, and of the federal government. Canadian Endangered Species Conservation Council. 2016. Wild Species 2015: The General Status of Species in Canada. National General Status Working Group: 128 pp. Available in French under title: Espèces sauvages 2015: la situation générale des espèces au Canada. ii Abstract In this report, the conservation status of 29 848 species has been assessed in Canada among 34 different taxonomic groups: selected macrofungi, macrolichens, bryophytes, vascular plants, sponges, corals, freshwater bivalves, terrestrial and freshwater snails and slugs, spiders, mayflies, dragonflies and damselflies, stoneflies, grasshoppers and relatives, lacewings, beetles, ants, bees, yellowjacket wasps, caddisflies, moths and butterflies, scorpionflies, black flies, mosquitoes, horse flies, bee flies, flower flies, decapods, sea cucumbers, sea urchins, fishes, amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals. Results indicate that the majority of species in Canada are secure. In fact, among species that are critically imperiled, imperiled, vulnerable, apparently secure or secure, 80% of species have a national rank of apparently secure or secure. However, 1659 species were identified as may be at risk in Canada. Of these, 1032 species have only a small part of their range in Canada (10% or less) and 498 are intermediary (from 11% to 74%). However, 129 species have 75% or more of their range in Canada, of which 99 species are thought to be endemic to Canada. A priority score was determined for each of the 1659 species that may be at risk, and 296 species had the highest priority scores (between 1 and 5).
    [Show full text]
  • The Distribution, Status & Conservation Needs of Canada's Endemic Species
    Ours to Save The distribution, status & conservation needs of Canada’s endemic species June 4, 2020 Version 1.0 Ours to Save: The distribution, status & conservation needs of Canada’s endemic species Additional information and updates to the report can be found at the project website: natureconservancy.ca/ourstosave Citation Enns, Amie, Dan Kraus and Andrea Hebb. 2020. Ours to save: the distribution, status and conservation needs of Canada’s endemic species. NatureServe Canada and Nature Conservancy of Canada. Report prepared by Amie Enns (NatureServe Canada) and Dan Kraus (Nature Conservancy of Canada). Mapping and analysis by Andrea Hebb (Nature Conservancy of Canada). Cover photo credits (l-r): Wood Bison, canadianosprey, iNaturalist; Yukon Draba, Sean Blaney, iNaturalist; Salt Marsh Copper, Colin Jones, iNaturalist About NatureServe Canada A registered Canadian charity, NatureServe Canada and its network of Canadian Conservation Data Centres (CDCs) work together and with other government and non-government organizations to develop, manage, and distribute authoritative knowledge regarding Canada’s plants, animals, and ecosystems. NatureServe Canada and the Canadian CDCs are members of the international NatureServe Network, spanning over 80 CDCs in the Americas. NatureServe Canada is the Canadian affiliate of NatureServe, based in Arlington, Virginia, which provides scientific and technical support to the international network. About the Nature Conservancy of Canada The Nature Conservancy of Canada (NCC) works to protect our country’s most precious natural places. Proudly Canadian, we empower people to safeguard the lands and waters that sustain life. Since 1962, NCC and its partners have helped to protect 14 million hectares (35 million acres), coast to coast to coast.
    [Show full text]
  • Bryophyte Biology Second Edition
    This page intentionally left blank Bryophyte Biology Second Edition Bryophyte Biology provides a comprehensive yet succinct overview of the hornworts, liverworts, and mosses: diverse groups of land plants that occupy a great variety of habitats throughout the world. This new edition covers essential aspects of bryophyte biology, from morphology, physiological ecology and conservation, to speciation and genomics. Revised classifications incorporate contributions from recent phylogenetic studies. Six new chapters complement fully updated chapters from the original book to provide a completely up-to-date resource. New chapters focus on the contributions of Physcomitrella to plant genomic research, population ecology of bryophytes, mechanisms of drought tolerance, a phylogenomic perspective on land plant evolution, and problems and progress of bryophyte speciation and conservation. Written by leaders in the field, this book offers an authoritative treatment of bryophyte biology, with rich citation of the current literature, suitable for advanced students and researchers. BERNARD GOFFINET is an Associate Professor in Ecology and Evolutionary Biology at the University of Connecticut and has contributed to nearly 80 publications. His current research spans from chloroplast genome evolution in liverworts and the phylogeny of mosses, to the systematics of lichen-forming fungi. A. JONATHAN SHAW is a Professor at the Biology Department at Duke University, an Associate Editor for several scientific journals, and Chairman for the Board of Directors, Highlands Biological Station. He has published over 130 scientific papers and book chapters. His research interests include the systematics and phylogenetics of mosses and liverworts and population genetics of peat mosses. Bryophyte Biology Second Edition BERNARD GOFFINET University of Connecticut, USA AND A.
    [Show full text]
  • Bryological Times 1994 78
    Volume 78 April 1994 ISSN 0253-4738 Contents Computers and Authors of scientific names .......... 1 New literature ....................................................... 2 What is a Hypnoid peristome? .............................. 3 Towards a World Red List of Bryophytes. II ......... 4 Why do we need author citations? ........................ 6 I A B Committees ................................................. 6 Internet sources for bryological information ......... 7 New Bryophyte collection in Missouri Botanical Garden ............................................................. 7 Local floras - publish or be damned? .................... 8 KARTBASE, a new Dbase application for mapping projects ............................................................. 9 Keyword thesaurus available ................................ 9 Product News: Herbarium aids ........................... 10 Product news: useful watches ............................. 11 The “Flora Briológica Ibérica“ Project ............... 11 Bryological Data - an alternative approach ......... 12 Bryophyte Nomenclature - a further response ..... 13 DIARY ............................................................... 14 Computers and Authors of scientific names Gillis Een Karlbergsvägen 78, 113 35 Stockholm Almost all bryologists today are us- may offer some variations - such as writing of authors’ names. For my own ing computers and word-processors for Racomitrium/Rhacomitrium and Weis- use I have formulated a number of rules, producing, transferring and storing texts sia/Weisia
    [Show full text]
  • Helsingin Yliopisto
    Evolution of the Neckeraceae (Bryopsida) Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades (Dr. rer. nat.) der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Technischen Universität Dresden vorgelegt von Sanna Olsson (Uppsala, Schweden) Dresden 2008 1. Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Christoph Neinhuis, Dresden 2. Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Dietmar Quandt, Bonn 3. Gutachter: PD Dr. Sanna Huttunen, Turku TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of contents........................................................................................................................................ 3 Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................................... 5 Introduction................................................................................................................................................ 7 Introduction............................................................................................................................................. 7 Material, methods & related discussion ................................................................................................ 10 Results & discussion ............................................................................................................................. 12 Conclusions........................................................................................................................................... 14 Chapter 1.................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ours to Save the Distribution, Status & Conservation Needs of Canada’S Endemic Species
    Ours to Save The distribution, status & conservation needs of Canada’s endemic species June 4, 2020 Version 1.0 Ours to Save: The distribution, status & conservation needs of Canada’s endemic species Additional information and updates to the report can be found at the project website: natureconservancy.ca/ourstosave Suggested citation: Enns, Amie, Dan Kraus and Andrea Hebb. 2020. Ours to save: the distribution, status and conservation needs of Canada’s endemic species. NatureServe Canada and Nature Conservancy of Canada. Report prepared by Amie Enns (NatureServe Canada) and Dan Kraus (Nature Conservancy of Canada). Mapping and analysis by Andrea Hebb (Nature Conservancy of Canada). Cover photo credits (l-r): Wood Bison, canadianosprey, iNaturalist; Yukon Draba, Sean Blaney, iNaturalist; Salt Marsh Copper, Colin Jones, iNaturalist About NatureServe Canada A registered Canadian charity, NatureServe Canada and its network of Canadian Conservation Data Centres (CDCs) work together and with other government and non-government organizations to develop, manage, and distribute authoritative knowledge regarding Canada’s plants, animals, and ecosystems. NatureServe Canada and the Canadian CDCs are members of the international NatureServe Network, spanning over 80 CDCs in the Americas. NatureServe Canada is the Canadian affiliate of NatureServe, based in Arlington, Virginia, which provides scientific and technical support to the international network. About the Nature Conservancy of Canada The Nature Conservancy of Canada (NCC) works to protect our country’s most precious natural places. Proudly Canadian, we empower people to safeguard the lands and waters that sustain life. Since 1962, NCC and its partners have helped to protect 14 million hectares (35 million acres), coast to coast to coast.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Biodiversity: the IUCN Red List and SARA
    Canadian Biodiversity : The IUCN Red List and SARA Bombus terricol a , photo by Tom Murray – Discover Life Debborah Donnelly University College Dublin World Heritage Conservation May 27 , 2016 D. Donnelly 1 Introduction Canadian biodiversity is extensive , and is subjected to many of the same g lobal pressures that effect all non - human species. The IUCN Red List was developed to inform and encourage governments to take action in a prioritised fashion, in order to address those species most at risk. This paper shall i dentify the differences betwee n the IUCN Red List and the Canadian Species at Risk Act (SARA) registr y with regards to Canadian taxa, as well as the major threats facing them. A spreadsheet will be included with information gleaned from both databases for conducting analysis, and in or der to c ompare and contrast the results for Canada with the IUCN list of global priorities. IUCN Red List Criteria The IUCN (2012: 14 - 15) provides definitions for the criteria following: “ Least Concern (LC) - A taxon is Least Concern when it has been evalu ated against the criteria and does not qualify for Critically Endangered, Endangered, Vulnerable or Near Threatened. Widespread and abundant taxa are included in this category. Near Threatened (NT) - A taxon is Near Threatened when it has been evaluated ag ainst the criteria but does not qualify for Critically Endangered, Endangered or Vulnerable now, but is close to qualifying for or is likely to qualify for a threatened category in the near future . Vulnerable (VU) - A taxon is Vulnerable when the best avai lable evidence indicates that it meets any of the criteria A to E for Vulnerable (see Section V), and it is therefore considered to be facing a high risk of extinction in the wild.
    [Show full text]