DOCSLIB.ORG

6.5 X 11 Double Line.P65

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-87225-6 - Bryophyte Biology, Second Edition Edited by Bernard Goffinet and A. Jonathan Shaw Index More information Index Entries in bold refer to figures 3/2 self-thinning rule 405 Acromastigum 44 allele replacement 219, 221 Acroporium 122 Allionellopsis 122 Abietinella 117 Acroschisma 86, 100 Allisonia 5, 21, 38 Abietinella abietina 398 Acroschisma wilsonii 86 Allisonia cockaynei – abscisic acid (ABA) 260, 274, Acroscyphella 46 gametophyte 12 275, 276, 279 acrotelm 357, 361, 363, 371, Allisoniaceae 20, 38 abscisic acid – Responsive 373, 374, 381 Allisoniella 45 Elements (ABREs) 279 Actinodontium 115 allopatric speciation 463 Ac/Ds transposition 211 Actinothuidium 116 allopolyploid 451, 464 Acanthocoleus 41 active transport 301 allopolyploidy 446, 470 Acantholejeunea 41 Adelanthaceae 45 Alobiella 45 Acanthorrhynchium 122 Adelanthus 45 Alobiellopsis 45 Acaulon 107 Adelothecium 114 Aloinella 107 Acer platanoides 416, 418, 431 adenosine kinase 457 Aloinia 107 Achrophyllum 114 adk 457 Alophozia 101 acid phosphatase 321 Aerobryidium 119 Alsia 125 acidic peatlands 363, 369, 376 Aerobryopsis 119 aluminum (Al) 308, 324, 336, Acidodontium 110 Aerobryum 118 337, 338 Acritodon 119 Aerolindigia 118 Amazoopsis 44 Acrobolbaceae 46 AFLPs see Amplified Fragment Amblyodon 109 Acrobolbus 46 Length Polymorphism Amblyolejeunea 41 acrocarpous mosses 394 Agrostis curtisii 426 Amblystegiaceae 116 Acrochila 45 Aitchisoniella 25, 36 Amblystegium 116, 452 Acrocladium 125 a-cellulose 372 Amblytropis 115 Acrolejeunea 41 Aligrimmia 104 Ambuchanania 73, 100, 498 Acrolophozia 47 alkaline peatlands 364 Ambuchananiaceae 100 535 © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-87225-6 - Bryophyte Biology, Second Edition Edited by Bernard Goffinet and A. Jonathan Shaw Index More information 536 Index Ambuchananiales 100 Aneuraceae 21, 30, 40 Antitrichia 68, 123 ammonia (NH3) 308, 320 anhydrobiosis 225, 228 Antitrichia curtipendula 242, 418 þ ammonium (NH4 ) 301, 311, Anisotachis 46 Aongstroemia 106 321, 333 Anisothecium 106 Aongstroemiopsis 106 Amphicephalozia 45 annual shuttle 327, 515 Aphanolejeunea 41 Amphidium 106 Anoectangium 107 Aphanorhegma 103 Amphijubula 41 Anomacaulis 45 Aphanotropis 41 Amphilejeunea 42 Anomobryum 110 apical cell (see also under Amphilophocolea 44 Anomobryum filiforme 247 liverwort, moss, and Amplified Fragment Length Anomoclada 45 hornwort) 1, 11, 177, 237, Polymorphism 456 Anomodon 126, 239 239, 247 Anacamptodon 116 Anomodon rostratus 425 Aplodon 109 Anacolia 110 Anomodon viticulosus 242, Apomarsupella 47 Anacolia menziesii 452 255, 256 Apometzgeria 40 Anacolia webbii 452 desiccation 259 apophysis 335 Anastrepta 45 photosynthesis 255 apoplast water 241, 243 Anastrophyllum 45, 400 Anomodontaceae 125 Apotomanthus 45 Anastrophyllum hellerianum 332, Anomomarsupella 47 Apotreubia 34 399, 401 Anoplolejeunea 41 Aptychella 122 ancestor–descendant Anthelia 47 Aptychopsis 122 comparison 176, Antheliaceae 8, 47 aquaporins 300 177, 178 antheridiophore 24 Arabidopsis 200, 205, 208, Ancistrodes 114 antimony (Sb) 324 209, 211, 213, 217, 227, Andoa 119 Anthoceros 139, 140, 142, 144, 230, 276 Andreaea 57, 63, 67, 80, 81, 155, 159, 161, 162, 166, Arabidopsis thaliana 205, 85, 86, 87, 92, 94, 99, 247, 302, 320 227, 300 100, 331 land plant phylogeny 187 Arachniopsis 44 Andreaea alpina 242, 243, 337 & Nostoc 319 Arbusculohypopterygium 114 Andreaea rothii 248, 256, 337 Anthoceros agrestis – archegoniate 154 Andreaeaceae 100 pyrenoid 148 archegoniophore 24 Andreaeales 100 Anthoceros angustatus 159 Archeochaete 44 Andreaeobryaceae 101 pyrenoglobuli 149 Archeophylla 44 Andreaeobryales 101 pyrenoid 149 Archidiaceae 104 Andreaeobryopsida 61, 97, 101 Anthoceros cavernosus 159 Archidiales 104 Andreaeobryum 57, 59, 80, 81, Anthoceros fusiformis 142 Archidium 86, 88, 104 85, 86, 87, 99, 101 Anthoceros punctatus 142, 159 Archilejeunea 41 Andreaeopsida 60, 61, 63, 79, spore 161 Arctoa 106 97, 100 thallus anatomy 150 Arctoscyphus 46 Andrewsianthus 45 Anthoceros tuberculatus 159 area for CO2 uptake/projected Aneura 22, 26, 31, 40 Anthocerotaceae 142, 149 leaf area ratio 248 Aneura pinguis 452 Anthocerotales 141, 142 Arnellia 46 apical and slime cell 4 Anthocerotidae 142, 144 Arnelliaceae 46 gametophyte 13 Anthocerotophyta 142 arsenic (As) 324 sporophyte 27 Anthocerotopsida 142, 144 Arthrocormus 107 © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-87225-6 - Bryophyte Biology, Second Edition Edited by Bernard Goffinet and A. Jonathan Shaw Index More information Index 537 Aschisma 107 Baldwiniella 124 bog 358, 360, 360, 361, Ascidiota 41 Barbella 119 363, 371, 376, 378, ascorbate 278 Barbellopsis 119 379, 426 Asterella 22, 24, 25, 27, 36 Barbilophozia 45 carbon accumulation 381 Asterella tenella – Barbula 107 chemistry 362 carpocephalum 11 Bardunovia 119 depth 370 Astomiopsis 105 Bartramia 110 net primary production 380 Athalamia 24, 36 Bartramiaceae 65, bohemite 308 atmospheric CO2 383 110, 247 boron (B) 324 atmospheric pollution 238 Bartramiales 110 Boulaya 117 ATP 286, 301 Bartramiopsis 101 boundary layer 245 Atractylocarpus 107 basic 369 Brachelyma 115 Atrichopsis 101 Bazzania 44 Brachiolejeunea 41 Atrichum 101 Bazzania novae-zelandiae – Brachydontium 104 Atrichum androgynum 273, gametophyte 14 Brachymeniopsis 103 277, 279 Bazzania trilobata 242, 243 Brachymenium 110 Atrichum angustatum 398 Beeveria 114 Brachymenium leptophyllum 94 Atrichum undulatum –CO2 Bellibarbula 107 Brachytheciaceae 118, 329 uptake 249 Benitotania 114 Brachytheciastrum 118 Aulacomniaceae 112 Bescherellia 113 Brachythecium 64, 82, 118, 313 Aulacomnium 63, 112, 370 Bestia 125 Brachythecium praelongum 404 Aulacomnium palustre 248, 367, Betula 329 Brachythecium reflexum 426 379, 422, 425 Betula pendula 431 Brachythecium rutabulum 250, Aulacopilum 105 bioaccumulate 323 313, 314, 316, 332 Aureolejeunea 41 biolistic transformation 220 Brachythecium starkei 332, 426 Austinia 119 biological glass 276 Bragginsella 46 Austrofossombronia 38 biological species concept Braithwaitea 112 Austrofossombronia peruviana – 448, 472 Braithwaiteaceae 112 cells and oil bodies 8 biomineralization 307 Braunfelsia 106 Austrolejeunea 41 bismuth (Bi) 324 Braunia 111 Austrolembidium 44 Bissetia 107, 124 Breidleria 119 Austrolophozia 46 black spruce 379 Breutelia 110 Austrometzgeria 40 Blasia 26, 32, 35, 319 Brevianthaceae 45 Austrophilibertiella 105 and Nostoc 319 Brevianthus 45 Austroscyphus 46 Blasia pusilla – cells and oil Bromeliophila 41 auxin 72 bodies 8 Brothera 107 Aytoniaceae 24, 25, 29, 30, 31, Blasiaceae 8, 20, 35 Brotherella 122 36, 46 Blasiales 9, 22, 29, 31, 35 Brotherobryum 106 Blasiidae 21, 34 brown moss 362, 363, 364 BAC clone 207 Blepharidophyllaceae 46 Bruchia 105 Balantiopsidaceae 29, 46 Blepharidophyllum 46 Bruchia flexuosa 91 Balantiopsis 46 Blepharolejeunea 41 Bruchiaceae 105 Balantiopsis rosea – Blepharostoma 18, 44 Bryaceae 58, 67, 84, 109 gametophyte 14 Blindia 104 Bryales 109 © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-87225-6 - Bryophyte Biology, Second Edition Edited by Bernard Goffinet and A. Jonathan Shaw Index More information 538 Index Bryanae 99, 108 Bryoxiphiaceae 103 Calycularia radiculosa 5 Bryhnia 118 Bryoxiphiales 103 Calyculariaceae 20, 38 Bryidae 97, 108 Bryoxiphium 65, 69, 103 Calyculariineae 38 Brymela 115 Bryum 64, 80, 110, 333, 336 Calymperaceae 64, 66, 69, Brymela websteri 59 Bryum argenteum 333, 398 71, 107 Bryoandersonia 118 Bryum bicolor 327 Calymperastrum 107 Bryobartramia 93, 102 Bryum caespiticium 95 Calymperes 107 Bryobartramiaceae 102 Bryum schleicheri var. Calypogeia 7, 46, 367, 452, 454, Bryobeckettia 103 latifolium – culture 518 455, 468 Bryobrittonia 103 Bucegia 24, 36 Calypogeia azurea 455, 468 Bryobrothera 114 Buckiella 119 Calypogeia muelleriana 455, 468 Bryoceuthospora 107 Bucklandiella 104 cells and oil bodies 8 Bryochenea 116 bulk elastic modulus 241, 243 Calypogeia sphagnicola 455, 468 Bryocrumia 119 Buxbaumia 64, 67, 76, 84, 85, Calypogeiaceae 18, 46 Bryoerythrophyllum 107 86, 94, 102 Calyptopogon 107 Bryohumbertia 107 Buxbaumia viridis 328, 396, Calyptothecium 123 Bryolawtonia 124 402, 496 Calyptrochaeta 82, 114 Bryomanginia 105 Buxbaumiaceae 82, 102 Calyptrocolea 45 Bryonorrisia 126 Buxbaumiales 97, 102 Campanocolea 44 Bryophyta 100 Buxbaumiidae 102 Camptochaete 125 bryophyte – diversity in Camptodontium 106 vegetation 394 cadmium (Cd) 322, 324, 325 Campyliadelphus 116 ecological significance of Caduciella 124 Campylidium 119 life history features 395 Calatholejeunea 42 Campylium 116, 370 ecological significance of calcium (Ca) 301, 302, 304, Campylium stellatum 364 morphological 305, 307, 311, 317, 323, fen restoration 519 features 395 324, 333, 337, 338, 340, Campylophyllopsis 119 ecological significance of 361, 375 Campylophyllum 119 physiological calcium carbonate (CaCO3) Campylopodiella 107 features 395 336, 360 Campylopodium 106 life history diversity in calcium:sodium (Ca:Na) 340 Campylopus 82, 107, 460 spore bank 403 Callicladium 119 Campylopus introflexus 334, mitochondrial genome 180 Callicostella 115 427, 452, 460 paraphyly 180 Callicostellopsis 115 Campylopus paradoxus 334 sperm 178 Calliergon 116 Campylopus pilifer 452, 460 Bryopsida 61, 62, 64, 71, 94, Calliergonaceae 116 Campylostelium 104 97, 101 Calliergonella 119 Canalohypopterygium 62, 74, 114 Bryopteris 17, 41, 447 Calliergonella cuspidata 310, capillary space 239 Bryopteris diffusa 447 321, 338, 364, 425 capillary water 240 Bryopteris
Recommended publications
  • Novelties in the Hornwort Flora of Croatia and Southeast Europe

    Novelties in the Hornwort Flora of Croatia and Southeast Europe

    cryptogamie Bryologie 2019 ● 40 ● 22 DIRECTEUR DE LA PUBLICATION : Bruno David, Président du Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle RÉDACTEURS EN CHEF / EDITORS-IN-CHIEF : Denis LAMY ASSISTANTS DE RÉDACTION / ASSISTANT EDITORS : Marianne SALAÜN ([email protected]) MISE EN PAGE / PAGE LAYOUT : Marianne SALAÜN RÉDACTEURS ASSOCIÉS / ASSOCIATE EDITORS Biologie moléculaire et phylogénie / Molecular biology and phylogeny Bernard GOFFINET Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut (United States) Mousses d’Europe / European mosses Isabel DRAPER Centro de Investigación en Biodiversidad y Cambio Global (CIBC-UAM), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (Spain) Francisco LARA GARCÍA Centro de Investigación en Biodiversidad y Cambio Global (CIBC-UAM), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (Spain) Mousses d’Afrique et d’Antarctique / African and Antarctic mosses Rysiek OCHYRA Laboratory of Bryology, Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow (Pologne) Bryophytes d’Asie / Asian bryophytes Rui-Liang ZHU School of Life Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai (China) Bioindication / Biomonitoring Franck-Olivier DENAYER Faculté des Sciences Pharmaceutiques et Biologiques de Lille, Laboratoire de Botanique et de Cryptogamie, Lille (France) Écologie des bryophytes / Ecology of bryophyte Nagore GARCÍA MEDINA Department of Biology (Botany), and Centro de Investigación en Biodiversidad y Cambio Global (CIBC-UAM), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (Spain) COUVERTURE / COVER : Extraits d’éléments de la Figure 2 / Extracts of
  • Revision and Checklist of the Moss Families Bartramiaceae and Mniaceae in Vietnam Timo KOPONEN1, Thanh-Luc NGUYEN2, Thien-Tam L

    Revision and Checklist of the Moss Families Bartramiaceae and Mniaceae in Vietnam Timo KOPONEN1, Thanh-Luc NGUYEN2, Thien-Tam L

    Hattoria 10: 69–107. 2019 Revision and checklist of the moss families Bartramiaceae and Mniaceae in Vietnam Timo KOPONEN1, Thanh-Luc NGUYEN2, Thien-Tam LUONG3, 4 & Sanna HUTTUNEN4 1 Finnish-Chinese Botanical Foundation, Mailantie 109, FI-08800 Lohja, Finland & Finnish Museum of Natural History, Botany Unit (bryology), P.O. Box 7 (Unioninkatu 4), FI-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland 2 Southern Institute of Ecology, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, 1 Mac Dinh Chi, District 1, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam 3 University of Science, Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City, 227 Nguyen Van Cu, District 5, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam 4 Herbarium (TUR), Biodiversity Unit, FI 20014 University of Turku, Finland Author for correspondence: Thanh-Luc NGUYEN, [email protected] Abstract The genera Fleischerobryum Loeske and Philonotis Brid. of the Bartramiaceae and the family Mniaceae (excluding Pohlia Hedw.) are revised for Vietnam, based on specimens studied and literature reports. Four species are added to the flora: Orthomnion javense (M.Fleisch.) T.J.Kop., Philonotis asperifolia Mitt., P. laii T.J.Kop., P. speciosa (Griff.) Mitt. syn. nov. (based on P. mercieri Paris & Broth.), and Plagiomnium wui (T.J.Kop.) Y.J.Yi & S.He. Eight species are excluded from the flora. Two taxa are considered doubtful. The flora now includes one species of Fleischerobryum, eight species of Philonotis, one species of Mnium Hedw. (doubtful), three species of Orthomnion Wills. and five species of Plagiomnium (one doubtful). The 15 species are divided into phytogeographical elements. Eight belong to the Southeast Asiatic temperate to meridional element, and seven to the Southeast Asiatic meridional to subtropical element.
  • Phytotaxa, a Synthesis of Hornwort Diversity

    Phytotaxa, a Synthesis of Hornwort Diversity

    Phytotaxa 9: 150–166 (2010) ISSN 1179-3155 (print edition) www.mapress.com/phytotaxa/ Article PHYTOTAXA Copyright © 2010 • Magnolia Press ISSN 1179-3163 (online edition) A synthesis of hornwort diversity: Patterns, causes and future work JUAN CARLOS VILLARREAL1 , D. CHRISTINE CARGILL2 , ANDERS HAGBORG3 , LARS SÖDERSTRÖM4 & KAREN SUE RENZAGLIA5 1Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, 75 North Eagleville Road, Storrs, CT 06269; [email protected] 2Centre for Plant Biodiversity Research, Australian National Herbarium, Australian National Botanic Gardens, GPO Box 1777, Canberra. ACT 2601, Australia; [email protected] 3Department of Botany, The Field Museum, 1400 South Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, IL 60605-2496; [email protected] 4Department of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway; [email protected] 5Department of Plant Biology, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL 62901; [email protected] Abstract Hornworts are the least species-rich bryophyte group, with around 200–250 species worldwide. Despite their low species numbers, hornworts represent a key group for understanding the evolution of plant form because the best–sampled current phylogenies place them as sister to the tracheophytes. Despite their low taxonomic diversity, the group has not been monographed worldwide. There are few well-documented hornwort floras for temperate or tropical areas. Moreover, no species level phylogenies or population studies are available for hornworts. Here we aim at filling some important gaps in hornwort biology and biodiversity. We provide estimates of hornwort species richness worldwide, identifying centers of diversity. We also present two examples of the impact of recent work in elucidating the composition and circumscription of the genera Megaceros and Nothoceros.
  • Floristic Study of Bryophytes in a Subtropical Forest of Nabeup-Ri at Aewol Gotjawal, Jejudo Island

    Floristic Study of Bryophytes in a Subtropical Forest of Nabeup-Ri at Aewol Gotjawal, Jejudo Island

    − pISSN 1225-8318 Korean J. Pl. Taxon. 48(1): 100 108 (2018) eISSN 2466-1546 https://doi.org/10.11110/kjpt.2018.48.1.100 Korean Journal of ORIGINAL ARTICLE Plant Taxonomy Floristic study of bryophytes in a subtropical forest of Nabeup-ri at Aewol Gotjawal, Jejudo Island Eun-Young YIM* and Hwa-Ja HYUN Warm Temperate and Subtropical Forest Research Center, National Institute of Forest Science, Seogwipo 63582, Korea (Received 24 February 2018; Revised 26 March 2018; Accepted 29 March 2018) ABSTRACT: This study presents a survey of bryophytes in a subtropical forest of Nabeup-ri, known as Geumsan Park, located at Aewol Gotjawal in the northwestern part of Jejudo Island, Korea. A total of 63 taxa belonging to Bryophyta (22 families 37 genera 44 species), Marchantiophyta (7 families 11 genera 18 species), and Antho- cerotophyta (1 family 1 genus 1 species) were determined, and the liverwort index was 30.2%. The predominant life form was the mat form. The rates of bryophytes dominating in mesic to hygric sites were higher than the bryophytes mainly observed in xeric habitats. These values indicate that such forests are widespread in this study area. Moreover, the rock was the substrate type, which plays a major role in providing micro-habitats for bryophytes. We suggest that more detailed studies of the bryophyte flora should be conducted on a regional scale to provide basic data for selecting indicator species of Gotjawal and evergreen broad-leaved forests on Jejudo Island. Keywords: bryophyte, Aewol Gotjawal, liverwort index, life-form Jejudo Island was formed by volcanic activities and has geological, ecological, and cultural aspects (Jeong et al., 2013; unique topological and geological features.
  • Fossil Mosses: What Do They Tell Us About Moss Evolution?

    Fossil Mosses: What Do They Tell Us About Moss Evolution?

    Bry. Div. Evo. 043 (1): 072–097 ISSN 2381-9677 (print edition) DIVERSITY & https://www.mapress.com/j/bde BRYOPHYTEEVOLUTION Copyright © 2021 Magnolia Press Article ISSN 2381-9685 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/bde.43.1.7 Fossil mosses: What do they tell us about moss evolution? MicHAEL S. IGNATOV1,2 & ELENA V. MASLOVA3 1 Tsitsin Main Botanical Garden of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia 2 Faculty of Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia 3 Belgorod State University, Pobedy Square, 85, Belgorod, 308015 Russia �[email protected], https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1520-042X * author for correspondence: �[email protected], https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6096-6315 Abstract The moss fossil records from the Paleozoic age to the Eocene epoch are reviewed and their putative relationships to extant moss groups discussed. The incomplete preservation and lack of key characters that could define the position of an ancient moss in modern classification remain the problem. Carboniferous records are still impossible to refer to any of the modern moss taxa. Numerous Permian protosphagnalean mosses possess traits that are absent in any extant group and they are therefore treated here as an extinct lineage, whose descendants, if any remain, cannot be recognized among contemporary taxa. Non-protosphagnalean Permian mosses were also fairly diverse, representing morphotypes comparable with Dicranidae and acrocarpous Bryidae, although unequivocal representatives of these subclasses are known only since Cretaceous and Jurassic. Even though Sphagnales is one of two oldest lineages separated from the main trunk of moss phylogenetic tree, it appears in fossil state regularly only since Late Cretaceous, ca.
  • Bryophytes of Azorean Parks and Gardens (I): “Reserva Florestal De Recreio Do Pinhal Da Paz” - São Miguel Island

    Bryophytes of Azorean Parks and Gardens (I): “Reserva Florestal De Recreio Do Pinhal Da Paz” - São Miguel Island

    Arquipelago - Life and Marine Sciences ISSN: 0873-4704 Bryophytes of Azorean parks and gardens (I): “Reserva Florestal de Recreio do Pinhal da Paz” - São Miguel Island CLARA POLAINO-MARTIN, ROSALINA GABRIEL, PAULO A.V. BORGES, RICARDO CRUZ AND ISABEL S. ALBERGARIA Polaino-Martin, C.P., R. Gabriel, P.A.V. Borges, R. Cruz and I.S. Albergaria 2020. Bryophytes of Azorean parks and gardens (I): “Reserva Florestal de Recreio do Pinhal da Paz” - São Miguel Island. Arquipelago. Life and Marine Sciences 37: 1 – 20. https://doi.org/10.25752/arq.23643 Historic urban parks and gardens are increasingly being considered as interesting refuges for a great number of species, including some rare taxa, otherwise almost absent from urban areas, such as many bryophytes and other biota that are not their main focus. After a bibliographic work, the "Reserva Florestal de Recreio do Pinhal da Paz" (RFR-PP), in São Miguel Island (Azores), stood out as one of the least studied areas of the region, without any bryophyte’ references. Thus, the aim of this study was to identify the most striking bryophyte species present along the main visitation track of RFR-PP, in order to increase its biodiversity knowledge. Bryophytes growing on rocks, soil or tree bark were collected ad- hoc, in 17 sites, ca. 100 m apart from each other. In total, 43 species were identified: 23 mosses, 19 liverworts, and one hornwort, encompassing five classes, 15 orders and 27 families. Seven species are endemic from Europe and three from Macaronesia. No invasive bryophytes were found in the surveyed area.
  • Plant Life Magill’S Encyclopedia of Science

    Plant Life Magill’S Encyclopedia of Science

    MAGILLS ENCYCLOPEDIA OF SCIENCE PLANT LIFE MAGILLS ENCYCLOPEDIA OF SCIENCE PLANT LIFE Volume 4 Sustainable Forestry–Zygomycetes Indexes Editor Bryan D. Ness, Ph.D. Pacific Union College, Department of Biology Project Editor Christina J. Moose Salem Press, Inc. Pasadena, California Hackensack, New Jersey Editor in Chief: Dawn P. Dawson Managing Editor: Christina J. Moose Photograph Editor: Philip Bader Manuscript Editor: Elizabeth Ferry Slocum Production Editor: Joyce I. Buchea Assistant Editor: Andrea E. Miller Page Design and Graphics: James Hutson Research Supervisor: Jeffry Jensen Layout: William Zimmerman Acquisitions Editor: Mark Rehn Illustrator: Kimberly L. Dawson Kurnizki Copyright © 2003, by Salem Press, Inc. All rights in this book are reserved. No part of this work may be used or reproduced in any manner what- soever or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy,recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without written permission from the copyright owner except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews. For information address the publisher, Salem Press, Inc., P.O. Box 50062, Pasadena, California 91115. Some of the updated and revised essays in this work originally appeared in Magill’s Survey of Science: Life Science (1991), Magill’s Survey of Science: Life Science, Supplement (1998), Natural Resources (1998), Encyclopedia of Genetics (1999), Encyclopedia of Environmental Issues (2000), World Geography (2001), and Earth Science (2001). ∞ The paper used in these volumes conforms to the American National Standard for Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, Z39.48-1992 (R1997). Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Magill’s encyclopedia of science : plant life / edited by Bryan D.
  • Molecular Phylogeny of Chinese Thuidiaceae with Emphasis on Thuidium and Pelekium

    Molecular Phylogeny of Chinese Thuidiaceae with Emphasis on Thuidium and Pelekium

    Molecular Phylogeny of Chinese Thuidiaceae with emphasis on Thuidium and Pelekium QI-YING, CAI1, 2, BI-CAI, GUAN2, GANG, GE2, YAN-MING, FANG 1 1 College of Biology and the Environment, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China. 2 College of Life Science, Nanchang University, 330031 Nanchang, China. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract We present molecular phylogenetic investigation of Thuidiaceae, especially on Thudium and Pelekium. Three chloroplast sequences (trnL-F, rps4, and atpB-rbcL) and one nuclear sequence (ITS) were analyzed. Data partitions were analyzed separately and in combination by employing MP (maximum parsimony) and Bayesian methods. The influence of data conflict in combined analyses was further explored by two methods: the incongruence length difference (ILD) test and the partition addition bootstrap alteration approach (PABA). Based on the results, ITS 1& 2 had crucial effect in phylogenetic reconstruction in this study, and more chloroplast sequences should be combinated into the analyses since their stability for reconstructing within genus of pleurocarpous mosses. We supported that Helodiaceae including Actinothuidium, Bryochenea, and Helodium still attributed to Thuidiaceae, and the monophyletic Thuidiaceae s. lat. should also include several genera (or species) from Leskeaceae such as Haplocladium and Leskea. In the Thuidiaceae, Thuidium and Pelekium were resolved as two monophyletic groups separately. The results from molecular phylogeny were supported by the crucial morphological characters in Thuidiaceae s. lat., Thuidium and Pelekium. Key words: Thuidiaceae, Thuidium, Pelekium, molecular phylogeny, cpDNA, ITS, PABA approach Introduction Pleurocarpous mosses consist of around 5000 species that are defined by the presence of lateral perichaetia along the gametophyte stems. Monophyletic pleurocarpous mosses were resolved as three orders: Ptychomniales, Hypnales, and Hookeriales (Shaw et al.
  • Phylogeny and Classification of Lejeuneaceae Subtribe Cheilolejeuneinae (Marchantiophyta) Based on Nuclear and Plastid Molecular Markers

    Phylogeny and Classification of Lejeuneaceae Subtribe Cheilolejeuneinae (Marchantiophyta) Based on Nuclear and Plastid Molecular Markers

    Cryptogamie, Bryologie, 2015, 36 (4): 313-333 © 2015 Adac. Tous droits réservés Phylogeny and classification of Lejeuneaceae subtribe Cheilolejeuneinae (Marchantiophyta) based on nuclear and plastid molecular markers Wen YE a,b, S. Robbert GRADSTEIN c, A. Jonathan SHAW d, Blanka SHAW d, Boon-Chuan HO e, Alfons SCHÄFER-VErwIMP f, Tamás PÓCS g, Jochen HEINRICHS h & Rui-Liang ZHU b* aKey Laboratory of Plant Resources Conservation and Sustainable Utilization, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xingke Road 723, Tianhe District, Guangzhou 510650, P. R. China bDepartment of Biology, School of Life Sciences, East China Normal University, 3663 Zhong Shan North Road, Shanghai 200062, P. R. China cMuséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Dept. Systématique et Evolution, Case Postale 39, 57 rue Cuvier, 75231 Paris cedex 05, France dBiology Department, Duke University, Box 90338 Durham, NC 27708, USA eSingapore Botanic Gardens, 1 Cluny Road, Singapore 259569, Republic of Singapore fMittlere Letten 11, 88634 Herdwangen-Schönach, Germany gBiology Institute of Eszterházy College, Eger, Pf. 43, H-3301, Hungary hDepartment of Biology I, University of Munich (LMU), Systematic Botany and Mycology, GeoBio-Center, Menzinger Strasse 67, 80638 Munich, Germany Abstract – Cheilolejeuneinae is an early diverging lineage of Lejeuneaceae tribe Lejeuneeae with a pantropical distribution. The current phylogeny and classification of this subtribe is based on morphological and limited-sampling molecular studies. Here we present a molecular phylogeny of Cheilolejeuneinae and related lineages based on maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood analyses, as well as Bayesian inference of two chloroplast regions (trnL-F, trnG) and the nuclear ribosomal ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 region, to test the monophyly of this subtribe, and to re-evaluate the infrageneric classification of Cheilolejeunea.
  • Hypnaceaeandpossiblyrelatedfn

    Hypnaceaeandpossiblyrelatedfn

    Hikobial3：645-665.2002 Molecularphylo窪enyOfhypnobrJ/aleanmOssesasin化rredfroma lar淫e-scaledatasetofchlOroplastlｂｃＬ，withspecialre他rencetothe HypnaceaeandpOssiblyrelatedfnmilies1 HIRoMITsuBoTA，ＴｏＭｏＴｓｕＧｕＡＲＩＫＡｗＡ，ＨＩＲｏＹｕＫＩＡＫＩＹＡＭＡ，ＥＦＲＡＩＮＤＥＬｕＮＡ，DoLoREs GoNzALEz,MASANoBuHIGucHIANDHIRoNoRIDEGucHI TsuBoTA,Ｈ､,ARIKAwA,Ｔ,AKIYAMA,Ｈ,,ＤＥＬｕＮＡ,Ｅ,GoNzALEz,，.,HIGucHI,Ｍ ４ ＆DEGucHI，Ｈ、2002.Ｍolecularphylogenyofhypnobryaleanmossesasinferred fiPomalarge-scaledatasetofchloroplastr6cL,ｗｉｔｈspecialreferencetotheHypnaceae andpossiblyrelatedfamiliesl3:645-665． ▲ Phylogeneticrelationshipswithinthehypnobryaleanmosses(ｉｅ,theHypnales,Leuco- dontales,andHookeriales）havebeenthefbcusofmuchattentioninrecentyears Herewepresentphylogeneticinfierencesonthislargeclade，andespeciallyonthe Hypnaceaeandpossiblyrelatedftlmilies，basedonmaximumlikelihoodanalysisof l81r6cLsequences、Oursmdycorroboratesthat（１）theHypnales(ｓｓｔｒ.[＝sensu Vittl984])andLeucodontalesareeachnotmonophyleticentities、TheHypnalesand LeucodontalestogethercompriseawellsupportedsistercladetotheHookeriales;(2) theSematophyllaceae(s」at［＝sensuTsubotaetaL2000,2001a,ｂ])andPlagiothecia‐ ceae(s・str.［＝sensupresentDareeachresolvedasmonophyleticgroups,whileno particularcladeaccommodatesallmembersoftheHypnaceaeandCryphaeaceae;ａｎｄ (3)theHypnaceaeaswellasitstypegenusﾉﾘDlwz"川tselfwerepolyphyletioThese resultsdonotconcurwiththesystemsofVitt(1984)andBuckandVitt(1986),who suggestedthatthegroupswithasinglecostawouldhavedivergedfiFomthehypnalean ancestoratanearlyevolutionarystage，fbllowedbythegroupswithadoublecosta (seealsoTsubotaetall999;Bucketal2000）OurresultsfiPomlikelihoodanalyses
  • Fifty Shades of Red: Lost Or Threatened Bryophytes in Africa

    Fifty Shades of Red: Lost Or Threatened Bryophytes in Africa

    Bothalia - African Biodiversity & Conservation ISSN: (Online) 2311-9284, (Print) 0006-8241 Page 1 of 7 Original Research Fifty shades of red: Lost or threatened bryophytes in Africa Authors: Background: A Red List of threatened bryophytes is lacking for Africa. The International 1,2 Jacques van Rooy Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Species Survival Commission (SSC) Bryophyte Ariel Bergamini3 Irene Bisang4 Specialist Group has recently launched the ‘Top 10 Initiative’ to identify the 10 species on each continent that are at highest risk of extinction. Affiliations: 1National Herbarium, South Objectives: The main aim of this paper was to highlight some of the lost or strongly threatened African National Biodiversity bryophyte species in sub-Saharan Africa and the East African islands and to draw up a Top 10 Institute, South Africa list for Africa. 2School of Animal, Method: Lost or threatened species have been identified with the help of experts on the Plant and Environmental bryoflora of Africa, global and regional Red Lists and taxonomic literature. Each species on Sciences, University of the this candidate list is discussed at the hand of its taxonomy, distribution, habitat, threat and Witwatersrand, South Africa current global or regional Red List status as far as previously assessed. 3 Department of Biodiversity Results: Fifty bryophyte species, representing 40 genera and 23 families, have been identified and Conservation Biology, Swiss Federal Research as Top 10 candidates. Of these, 29 are endemic to Africa and 21 are restricted to the East African Institute WSL, Switzerland islands. The majority of the candidate species occur in one of eight ‘biodiversity hotspots’ with most species (19) in the Madagascar and the Indian Ocean Islands hotspot.
  • Comparative Analysis of the Bryophyte Floras of Northwest Belarus Concrete Fortification and the Carpathians

    Comparative Analysis of the Bryophyte Floras of Northwest Belarus Concrete Fortification and the Carpathians

    Biodiv. Res. Conserv. 24: 23-27, 2011 BRC www.brc.amu.edu.pl DOI 10.2478/v10119-011-0025-7 Comparative analysis of the bryophyte floras of northwest Belarus concrete fortification and the Carpathians Anastasia Sakovich1 & Gennadij Rykovsky2 1Department of Botany, Faculty of Biology and Ecology, Yanka Kupala State University of Grodno, Ozheshko 22, Grodno, 230022, Republic of Belarus, e-mail: [email protected] 2V. F. Kuprevich Institute of Experimental Botany, Belarusian National Academy of Sciences, Academic 27, Minsk, 220072, Republic of Belarus, e-mail: [email protected] Abstract: The detailed research of bryophyte flora, carried out in 2008-2011 on fortifications from the times of the First World War and Second World War in Grodno district, resulted in recording 101 species, of which 95 species were true mosses (Bryophyta) and 6 species were hepatics (Marchantiophyta). Because the substratum displayed certain ecological similarity with carbonate rocks, we made comparative analysis of the species list. The total of 28 rare and very rare (in Belarus scale) bryophyte species were recorded, of which 3 species were included in the Red Data Book of Belarus; 3 species had a conser- vation status at the European level. Key words: bryophyte flora, concrete fortifications, carbonate rocks, comparative analysis 1. Introduction These constructions occur more often in the western part of the country. Older fortifications, built before the First In general, within a region, bryophyte floras retain World War (WWI), were the most interesting to us, in more ancient features than vascular floras. At the same particular the forts encircling Grodno town which are time, the mobility of bryophytes should not be under- especially extensive.