HARROGATE BOROUGH COUNCIL

PLANNING COMMITTEE

LIST OF APPLICATIONS DETERMINED BY THE HEAD OF PLANNING SERVICES UNDER THE SCHEME OF DELEGATION

CASE NUMBER: 10/05287/FUL WARD: Bilton CASE OFFICER: Phil Jewkes DATE VALID: 08.12.2010 GRID REF: E 429696 TARGET DATE: 02.02.2011 N 457617 DECISION DATE: 26.01.2011

APPLICATION NO: 6.79.104.E.FUL

LOCATION: 120 Knox Lane Harrogate North Yorkshire HG1 3AS

PROPOSAL: Erection of two storey extension.

APPLICANT: Mr Tom Cox

APPROVED subject to the following conditions:-

1 The development hereby permitted shall be begun on or before 26.01.2014.

2 The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in strict accordance with the submitted plans reference S10/164-04 received by the Local Planning Authority on the 2 December 2010.

3 The materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the extension hereby permitted shall match those used in the existing building.

Reasons for Conditions:-

1 To ensure compliance with Sections 91-94 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. 2 In order to ensure compliance with the approved drawings. 3 In the interests of visual amenity.

JUSTIFICATION FOR GRANTING CONSENT

1 The proposed side extension reflects the design and appearance of the application dwelling. There is adequate separation distance between the proposed extension and the adjacent dwelling to ensure that the proposal does not materially harm existing levels of privacy and amenity. The extension would not have any detrimental impact on the street scene or the special landscape area. The proposal therefore accords with the provisions of the development plan.

CASE NUMBER: 10/05298/FUL WARD: Bilton CASE OFFICER: Ms Hannah Morrall DATE VALID: 01.12.2010 GRID REF: E 430346 TARGET DATE: 26.01.2011 N 457532 DECISION DATE: 20.01.2011

APPLICATION NO: 6.79.11381.A.FUL

LOCATION: 13 Bachelor Drive Harrogate North Yorkshire HG1 3EH

PROPOSAL: Erection of rear extension and pitched roof to existing garage, installation of 3 roof lights and conversion of garage to form living space.

APPLICANT: Mr I Mitchell

APPROVED subject to the following conditions:-

1 The development hereby permitted shall be begun on or before 20.01.2014.

2 The development hereby permitted shall not be carried out otherwise than in strict accordance with the details shown on the following drawings:

Drawing numbers 1021 A(L)04 and 1021 A9K) 01A received on the 1st December 2010.

3 The external materials of the extension hereby approved shall match the existing materials of the dwelling house.

4 Notwithstanding the provisions of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 1995 (or any order revoking and re-enacting that Order with or without modification), the areas shown on the submitted drawing, Proposed Site Plan 1021 A (k) 01A and Proposed Ground Floor Plan 1021 A(K) 01A received on the 1st December 2010 as parking spaces, turning areas and access shall be kept available for their intended purposes at all times.

2 Reasons for Conditions:-

1 To ensure compliance with Sections 91-94 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. 2 In avoidance of doubt and in the interests of proper planning. 3 In the interests of visual amenity in accordance with Policies H15 and HD20 of the Harrogate District Local Plan and Policy SG4 of the Harrogate District Core Strategy DPD. 4 To ensure the provision of acceptable off street parking and in the interests of road safety.

JUSTIFICATION FOR GRANTING CONSENT

The scale, design and materials would respect the host property and the character and appearance of the area. The development would not harm the amenities of adjacent residents. The proposal therefore accords with guidance in Planning Policy Statement 1, Saved Policies H15 and HD20 of the Harrogate District Local Plan and Policies SG4, EQ1 and EQ2 of the Harrogate District Core Strategy DPD (adopted 2009) and 'The House Extensions and Garages Design Guide' (SPD).

CASE NUMBER: 10/05156/FUL WARD: Bishop Monkton CASE OFFICER: Mr Mark Danforth DATE VALID: 29.11.2010 GRID REF: E 433394 TARGET DATE: 24.01.2011 N 466697 DECISION DATE: 21.01.2011

APPLICATION NO: 6.54.128.A.FUL

LOCATION: Ivy House Farm Boroughbridge Road Bishop Monkton Harrogate North Yorkshire HG3 3QN

PROPOSAL: Erection of extension to kennel building, 3 silage clamps and slurry lagoon.

APPLICANT: Mr S Simpson

APPROVED subject to the following conditions:-

1 The development hereby permitted shall be begun on or before 21.01.2014.

2 The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in strict accordance with the submitted plans reference documents labelled Cow kennel building, bulk silage store, silage and slurry stores received 22 November 2010.

3 3 Notwithstanding the submitted details, prior to being brought into use a security fence shall be erected around the lagoon details of which shall be submitted for the written approval of the local planning authority.

4 The lagoon shall be covered with a floating crust in the form of LECA (light expanded clay aggregates) balls for the lifetime of the development.

Reasons for Conditions:-

1 To ensure compliance with Sections 91-94 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. 2 In order to ensure compliance with the approved drawings. 3 In the interests of safety and amenity. 4 In order to reduce smells emanating from the lagoon in the interests of residential amenity.

INFORMATIVES

1. The construction and operation of the scheme must comply with The Water Resources (Control of Pollution) (Silage, Slurry and Agricultural Fuel Oil) (England) Regulations 2010

The farm is located within a Nitrate Vulnerable Zone and therefore the rules under the Nitrate Pollution Prevention Regulations 2008 must be followed regarding storage capacity and slurry spreading. Guidance can be found at http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/quality/water/waterquality/diffuse/nitrate/help- for-farmers.htm

Under the terms of The Water Resources (Control of Pollution) (Silage, Slurry and Agricultural Fuel Oil) (England) Regulations 2010 the person who proposes to have control over any relevant storage installation is required to serve notice on the Environment Agency specifying the type of structure to be used and its location at least 14 days before it is to be used for the keeping or storing of any relevant substance.

We advise early contact with the Environment Agency local office to discuss the development before construction commences.

JUSTIFICATION FOR GRANTING CONSENT

The proposal represents suitably scaled additions to the farm holding, the design of which reflects that of other farm buildings. The proposal will therefore have a neutral impact on the character and appearance of the area. In addition adequate separation distances exist between the application property and neighbouring houses ensuring that the proposal does not materially harm existing levels of privacy and amenity. The proposal therefore accords with the provisions of the development plan.

4 CASE NUMBER: 10/05551/OHLEXP WARD: Bishop Monkton CASE OFFICER: Mr A Moxon DATE VALID: 21.12.2010 GRID REF: E 433199 TARGET DATE: 01.02.2011 N 466800 DECISION DATE: 26.01.2011

APPLICATION NO: 6.54.OHLEXP

LOCATION: Land Comprising Field At 433199 466800 Renton Close Bishop Monkton North Yorkshire

PROPOSAL: Notification for the erection of 'H' Substation.

APPLICANT: Northern Electric Distribution Limited

Subject to NO OBJECTIONS

1 The District/Borough Council/Authority: Harrogate Borough Council

(i) does not object for the proposed development detailed above to be undertaken under the exemptions laid down in the Overhead Lines (Exemption)(England and Wales) Regulations 2009.

(ii) does not wish the Secretary of State to consider the application using the full section 37 process under the Electricity Act 1989.

Reasons for Conditions:-

CASE NUMBER: 10/05308/FUL WARD: Boroughbridge CASE OFFICER: Mr Mark Danforth DATE VALID: 08.12.2010 GRID REF: E 440519 TARGET DATE: 02.02.2011 N 466401 DECISION DATE: 26.01.2011

APPLICATION NO: 6.64.463.A.FUL

LOCATION: Olive House Aldborough York North Yorkshire YO51 9ES

PROPOSAL: Erection of first floor side extension, single storey rear extension, conversion of garage to form additional living accommodation and alterations to first floor window to form two

5 smaller windows.

APPLICANT: Sir A Lawson-Tancred

APPROVED subject to the following conditions:-

1 The development hereby permitted shall be begun on or before 26.01.2014.

2 No development shall take place within the application area until the applicant has secured the implementation of a programme of archaeological work in accordance with a written scheme of investigation which has been submitted by the applicant and approved by the Planning Authority.

3 The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in strict accordance with the submitted plans reference H/25/03,04/EG10 Revision A received by the Local Planning Authority on the 3 December 2010.

4 Notwithstanding the provisions of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 1995 (or any order revoking and re-enacting that Order), no windows shall be inserted in the western elevations of the extension hereby approved, without the prior written approval of the Local Planning Authority.

Reasons for Conditions:-

1 To ensure compliance with Sections 91-94 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. 2 The site is of archaeological importance. 3 In order to ensure compliance with the approved drawings. 4 In the interests of privacy and residential amenity.

INFORMATIVES

1. If a programme of geotechnical investigation is proposed on site in due course, I would advise an archaeological response may be appropriate. The Historic Environment Team does not undertake archaeological work of this nature. The applicant/developer is advised to commission a professional archaeological contractor to prepare a written scheme of investigation (WSI) for, and to carry out, the archaeological work. The WSI should be formally approved in writing, prior to implementation I would request that a copy of any resulting reports from the archaeological fieldwork be forwarded to the Historic Environment Record Officer for inclusion in the Historic Environment Record.

JUSTIFICATION FOR GRANTING CONSENT

The proposal represents a suitably scaled addition to the property, the design of which

6 reflects that of the host property. The proposal will therefore have a neutral impact on the character and appearance of the area. In addition adequate separation distances exist between the application property and neighbouring houses ensuring that the proposal does not materially harm existing levels of privacy and amenity. The proposal therefore accords with the provisions of the development plan.

CASE NUMBER: 10/05024/FUL WARD: Claro CASE OFFICER: Mr Mark Danforth DATE VALID: 10.12.2010 GRID REF: E 444191 TARGET DATE: 04.02.2011 N 464729 DECISION DATE: 26.01.2011

APPLICATION NO: 6.72.78.B.FUL

LOCATION: Oak View Lower Dunsforth York North Yorkshire YO26 9RZ

PROPOSAL: Erection of extension to garage.

APPLICANT: Mr S Fearnly

APPROVED subject to the following conditions:-

1 The development hereby permitted shall be begun on or before 26.01.2014.

2 The external materials of the extension hereby approved shall match the existing to the satisfaction of the Local Planning Authority.

3 The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in strict accordance with the submitted plans reference ML02388 Drawing No02 received by the Local Planning Authority on the 26 November 2010.

Reasons for Conditions:-

1 To ensure compliance with Sections 91-94 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. 2 In the interests of visual amenity. 3 In order to ensure compliance with the approved drawings.

JUSTIFICATION FOR GRANTING CONSENT

The proposal represents a suitably scaled addition to the property, the design of which partially reflects that of the host property. The proposal will therefore have a neutral

7 impact on the character and appearance of the area. In addition adequate separation distances exist between the application property and neighbouring houses ensuring that the proposal does not materially harm existing levels of privacy and amenity. The proposal therefore accords with the provisions of the development plan.

CASE NUMBER: 10/05266/FUL WARD: Claro CASE OFFICER: Phil Jewkes DATE VALID: 09.12.2010 GRID REF: E 433770 TARGET DATE: 03.02.2011 N 459770 DECISION DATE: 26.01.2011

APPLICATION NO: 6.83.152.A.FUL

LOCATION: Cross Pass House Market Flat Lane Scotton Knaresborough North Yorkshire HG5 9JA

PROPOSAL: Erection of single storey link extensions between house and barn.

APPLICANT: Mr T Doswell

APPROVED subject to the following conditions:-

1 The development hereby permitted shall be begun on or before 26.01.2014.

2 The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in strict accordance with the submitted plans reference 8947, 8948 and 8949 received by the Local Planning Authority on the 29 November 2010.

Reasons for Conditions:-

1 To ensure compliance with Sections 91-94 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. 2 In order to ensure compliance with the approved drawings.

JUSTIFICATION FOR GRANTING CONSENT

The proposed extension reflects the design and appearance of the property and would not have any detrimental impact on the dwelling or the surrounding area. The proposal therefore accords with the provisions of the development plan.

CASE NUMBER: 10/05005/TPO WARD: Hookstone CASE OFFICER: Ms Hannah Morrall DATE VALID: 11.11.2010

8 CASE OFFICER: Ms Hannah Morrall DATE VALID: 11.11.2010 GRID REF: E 431961 TARGET DATE: 06.01.2011 N 454760 DECISION DATE: 01.02.2011

APPLICATION NO: 6.79.3958.F.TPO

LOCATION: Wayside Bowling Club St Leonards Oval Harrogate North Yorkshire HG2 8NT

PROPOSAL: Lateral crown reduction of 1 Oak and a group of 8 Beech trees within A1 of Tree Preservation Order 19/1991.

APPLICANT: Wayside Bowling Club

APPROVED subject to the following conditions:-

1 The works shall be completed within two years from the date of this decision.

2 This consent allows for the lateral crown reduction of the Oak tree, by a maximum of 2m from the edge of the Bowling Green and the 8 Beech trees, a lateral crown reduction, up to the rear edge of the footpath adjacent to the trees, by a maximum of 2m only off the side branches, within area A1 of Tree Preservation Order 19/1991. The works shall be carried out by a trained Arborist in accordance with British Standards 3998 (2010) Works to trees.

Reasons for Conditions:-

1 In the interests of the health and amenity of the trees. 2 In the interests of good arboricultural practice.

CASE NUMBER: 10/05389/FUL WARD: Hookstone CASE OFFICER: Ms Claire Barwick DATE VALID: 10.12.2010 GRID REF: E 432330 TARGET DATE: 04.02.2011 N 454527 DECISION DATE: 01.02.2011

APPLICATION NO: 6.79.12154.FUL

LOCATION: 21 Woodlands Green Harrogate North Yorkshire HG2 8QD

PROPOSAL: Erection of two storey rear extension.

9 APPLICANT: Mr And Mrs J Wilson

APPROVED subject to the following conditions:-

1 The development hereby permitted shall be begun on or before 01.02.2014.

2 The development hereby permitted shall not be carried out otherwise than in strict accordance with the submitted details.

3 The external materials of the extension hereby approved shall match the existing to the satisfaction of the Local Planning Authority.

Reasons for Conditions:-

1 To ensure compliance with Sections 91-94 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. 2 In order to ensure compliance with the approved drawings. 3 In the interests of visual amenity.

JUSTIFICATION FOR GRANTING CONSENT

In conclusion the proposed development does not detrimentally affect the spatial quality of the area, and complies with the saved Policies H15 and HD20 of the Harrogate District Local Plan and policies SG4, EQ1 and EQ2 of the Harrogate District Core Strategy and the Councils Design Guide.

CASE NUMBER: 10/05172/FUL WARD: Kirkby Malzeard CASE OFFICER: Mrs N M Waddington DATE VALID: 08.12.2010 GRID REF: E 430295 TARGET DATE: 02.02.2011 N 473062 DECISION DATE: 01.02.2011

APPLICATION NO: 6.12.37.AK.FUL

LOCATION: Springhill School North Stainley Ripon North Yorkshire HG4 3HN

PROPOSAL: Bricking up of existing openings and installation of 3 windows.

APPLICANT: Barnardo's

10 APPROVED subject to the following conditions:-

1 The development hereby permitted shall be begun on or before 01.02.2014.

2 The development hereby approved shall be carried out in accordance with drawing number 03 'Elevations' revised 16 November 2009, dated November 2010, received by the Local Planning Authority on 19 November 2010, and as modified by the conditions of this consent.

3 The brickwork of the development hereby approved shall match the existing including the contrasting coloured brick bands and cills.

Reasons for Conditions:-

1 To ensure compliance with Sections 91-94 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. 2 For the avoidance of doubt and in the interests of proper planning. 3 In the interests of visual amenity.

INFORMATIVES

1. There is a history of ground instability in the area. This sometimes arises from the presence of peat, sometimes from gypsum and sometimes a combination. You are advised to satisfy yourself that there is no such problem on this site, or that any problem can be overcome by taking appropriate measures, before works commence.

JUSTIFICATION FOR GRANTING CONSENT

The proposal represents minor alterations to the building, the design of which respects the host building and does not result in harm the countryside. The proposal accords with the provisions of the development plan.

CASE NUMBER: 10/04580/PNAFUL WARD: Killinghall CASE OFFICER: Laura Wilkinson DATE VALID: 06.12.2010 GRID REF: E 429284 TARGET DATE: 31.01.2011 N 461507 DECISION DATE: 31.01.2011

APPLICATION NO: 6.75.60.M.PNAFUL

LOCATION: Land Comprising Field At 429284 461507 Ripley North Yorkshire

PROPOSAL: Erection of detached agricultural building.

11 APPLICANT: K And D E Bowes

APPROVED subject to the following conditions:-

1 The development hereby permitted shall be begun on or before 31.01.2016.

2 The development hereby permitted shall not be carried out otherwise than in strict accordance with the submitted details, drawing titled 'Agricultural Building for Storage of Straw' and the location plan, both received and dated 14th October 2010.

3 The colour of the profile sheeting of the roof shall be 'anthracite', as agreed by the email received on the 25th January 2010.

Reasons for Conditions:-

1 To comply with Article 3 and Schedule 2 Part 6 of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 1995 2 In order to ensure compliance with the approved drawings. 3 In the interests of the visual amenity of the countryside.

CASE NUMBER: 10/05160/COU WARD: Knaresborough King James CASE OFFICER: Stuart Mills DATE VALID: 06.12.2010 GRID REF: E 435088 TARGET DATE: 31.01.2011 N 456993 DECISION DATE: 25.01.2011

APPLICATION NO: 6.100.406.K.COU

LOCATION: Prudames Cafe & Greengrocer 9 Silver Street Knaresborough North Yorkshire HG5 8AJ

PROPOSAL: Retrospective change of use of part of ground floor Greengrocers (Use Class A1 - Shop) to provide additional space for cafe (Use Class A3 - Restaurants and cafes).

APPLICANT: Mr J Prudames

APPROVED subject to the following conditions:-

1 The change of use hereby permitted relates to the ground floor area shown on Drawing HG1617/1/1, submitted on 19th November 2010.

12 Reasons for Conditions:-

1 For clarity and the avoidance of doubt.

INFORMATIVES

1. Any alterations to the shopfront or other external alterations may require planning permission. You are advised to discuss any proposals for alterations to the shopfront or other external alterations with this office to clarify if any permission is needed. 2. Any signage associated with the business may require advertisement consent. You are advised to discuss any proposals for signage with this office to clarify if any permissions are needed.

JUSTIFICATION FOR GRANTING CONSENT

Whilst in the strictest policy sense the change of use still leads to the loss of an A1 shop unit on a primary shopping frontage, it also supports the continued viability of an existing trader and brings a long-term vacant property back into use. Therefore, it is considered that the application can be supported on account of the specific circumstances of the case. Highway safety and residential amenity would not be harmed. The character and appearance of the Knaresborough Conservation Area would be conserved. The proposal therefore complies with the relevant policies of the Development Plan.

CASE NUMBER: 10/05394/COU WARD: Knaresborough King James CASE OFFICER: Phil Jewkes DATE VALID: 09.12.2010 GRID REF: E 434949 TARGET DATE: 03.02.2011 N 457122 DECISION DATE: 01.02.2011

APPLICATION NO: 6.100.2780.COU

LOCATION: 63 High Street Knaresborough North Yorkshire HG5 0HB

PROPOSAL: Change of use from retail unit (Use Class A1 - Shops) to Letting Agency (Use Class A2 - Financial and Professional Services).

APPLICANT: Fitzmaurice Lettings

APPROVED subject to the following conditions:-

1 The development hereby permitted shall be begun on or before 01.02.2014.

13 2 The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in strict accordance with the submitted plan and details received by the Local Planning Authority on the 10 December 2010.

Reasons for Conditions:-

1 To ensure compliance with Sections 91-94 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. 2 In order to ensure compliance with the approved drawings.

JUSTIFICATION FOR GRANTING CONSENT

The proposed use would not harm existing levels of privacy and amenity. The use would not have any detrimental impact on the shopping area. The proposal would have a neutral impact on the character and appearance of the conservation area and would not have any detrimental impact on the listed building. The proposal therefore accords with the provisions of the development plan.

CASE NUMBER: 10/05419/TPO WARD: Knaresborough King James CASE OFFICER: Phil Jewkes DATE VALID: 13.12.2010 GRID REF: E 434945 TARGET DATE: 07.02.2011 N 455502 DECISION DATE: 01.02.2011

APPLICATION NO: 6.100.2781.TPO

LOCATION: Land Comprising Courtyard Area Chadwick Park Knaresborough North Yorkshire

PROPOSAL: Crown lift to maximum height above ground level of 3 metres, lateral crown reduction to give a 1metre clearance from the street lamppost and crown clean and removal of deadwood to include cleaning out of any stumps, deadwood, hung up branches and climbers, the removal of sucker growth and trunk cleaning to a height of 2.5 metres above ground level of 4 Horse Chestnut trees within group G4 of Tree Preservation Order No. 25/2002

APPLICANT: Mr W Dias

APPROVED subject to the following conditions:-

1 The tree work hereby approved shall be begun on or before the expiration of two years from the date of this permission.

14 2 The work shall be carried out by a competent person in accordance with British Standard 3998 (2010) Recommendation for Tree Works. All works shall be carried out by an appropriately experienced and qualified tree surgeon with no pruning wounds in excess of 25mm diameter over bark.

Reasons for Conditions:-

1 In the interests of the health and amenity of the tree. 2 In the interests of the health and amenity of the tree.

CASE NUMBER: 10/04828/FUL WARD: Low Harrogate CASE OFFICER: Mrs G Pinna-Morrell DATE VALID: 08.12.2010 GRID REF: E 429750 TARGET DATE: 02.02.2011 N 454604 DECISION DATE: 01.02.2011

APPLICATION NO: 6.79.12148.FUL

LOCATION: 12 Queens Road Harrogate North Yorkshire HG2 0HB

PROPOSAL: Erection of double gate and railings (maximum height 1.9m).

APPLICANT: Mr Philip Peacock

APPROVED subject to the following conditions:-

1 The development hereby permitted shall be begun on or before 01.02.2014.

2 The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in strict accordance with drawing number GA1 Rev.A

3 The gates, gate posts and railings hereby permitted shall be painted black and shall thereafter be maintained and retained as such.

Reasons for Conditions:-

1 To ensure compliance with Sections 91-94 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. 2 In order to define the planning permission and in the interests of proper planning. 3 In order to safeguard the visual quality of the conservation area.

15 JUSTIFICATION FOR GRANTING CONSENT

The gates and railings retain the spatial character and quality of this part of the conservation area. The proposal therefore accords with the provisions of the development plan and there are no other material considerations in this instance that warrant setting aside local planning policies.

CASE NUMBER: 10/05291/REP WARD: Low Harrogate CASE OFFICER: Mr A Hough DATE VALID: 15.12.2010 GRID REF: E 430446 TARGET DATE: 09.02.2011 N 454826 DECISION DATE: 01.02.2011

APPLICATION NO: 6.79.2060.N.REP

LOCATION: Norwood House Rear Of 17 York Place Harrogate North Yorkshire

PROPOSAL: Replacement planning permission for 07/06031/FUL (expiry date 28/01/2011) for the erection of 2 pairs of semi-detached dwellings (Site Area 0.06ha) (Revised Scheme).

APPLICANT: York Place Mews LLP

APPROVED subject to the following conditions:-

1 The development hereby permitted shall be begun on or before 01.02.2014.

2 The development hereby permitted shall not be carried out otherwise than in strict accordance with the submitted details as modified by the other conditions of this consent.

3 Samples of the materials it is intended shall be used externally in the construction of the roof and walls of the development hereby approved, shall be submitted for the written approval of the Local Planning Authority and the development shall not be started before any such approval.

4 All new doors and windows shall be set back a minimum of 75mm from the external face of the walls to form reveals to the satisfaction of the Local Planning Authority.

5 The window frames of the development hereby permitted shall be constructed in timber and no other materials shall be used without the prior written consent of the Local Planning Authority.

6 The site shall be developed with separate systems of drainage for foul and surface

16 water.

7 Unless otherwise agreed by the Local Planning Authority, development other than that required to be carried out as part of an approved scheme of remediation must not commence until sections 1 to 4 have been complied with. If unexpected contamination is found after development has begun, development must be halted on that part of the site affected by the unexpected contamination to the extent specified by the Local Planning Authority in writing until section 4 has been complied with in relation to that contamination.

1. SITE CHARACTERISATION An investigation and risk assessment, in addition to any assessment provided with the planning application, must be completed in accordance with a scheme to assess the nature and extent of any contamination on the site, whether or not it originates on the site. The contents of the scheme are subject to the approval in writing of the Local Planning Authority. The investigation and risk assessment must be undertaken by competent persons and a written report of the findings must be produced. The written report is subject to the approval in writing of the Local Planning Authority. The report of the findings must include:

(i) a survey of the extent, scale and nature of contamination;

(ii) an assessment of the potential risks to: * human health, * property (existing or proposed) including buildings, crops, livestock, pets, woodland and service lines and pipes, * adjoining land, * groundwaters and surface waters * ecological systems * archaeological sites and ancient monuments;

(iii) an appraisal of remedial options, and proposal of the preferred option(s).

This must be conducted in accordance with DEFRA and the Environment Agency's 'Model Procedures for the Management of Land Contamination, CLR 11'.

2. SUBMISSION OF REMEDIATION SCHEME A detailed remediation scheme to bring the site to a condition suitable for the intended use by removing unacceptable risks to human health, buildings and other property and the natural and historical environment must be prepared, and is subject to the approval in writing of the Local Planning Authority. The scheme must include all works to be undertaken, proposed remediation objectives and remediation criteria, timetable of works and site management procedures. The scheme must ensure that the site will not qualify as contaminated land under Part2A of the Environmental Protection Act 1990 in relation to the intended use of the land after remediation.

3. IMPLEMENTATION OF APPROVED REMEDIATION SCHEME The approved remediation scheme must be carried out in accordance with its terms prior to the commencement of development other than that required to carry out remediation, unless otherwise approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority.

17 The Local Planning Authority must be given two weeks written notification of commencement of the remediation scheme works.

Following completion of measures identified in the approved remediation scheme, a verification report (referred to in PPS23 as a validation report) that demonstrates the effectiveness of the remediation carried out must be produced, and is subject to the approval in writing of the Local Planning Authority.

4. REPORTING OF UNEXPECTED CONTAMINATION In the event that contamination is found at any time when carrying out the approved development that was not previously identified it must be reported in writing immediately to the Local Planning Authority. An investigation and risk assessment must be undertaken in accordance with the requirement of section 1, and where remediation is necessary a remediation scheme must be prepared in accordance with the requirements of section 2, which is subject to the approval in writing of the Local Planning Authority.

Following completion of measures identified in the approved remediation scheme a verification report must be prepared, which is subject to the approval in writing of the Local Planning Authority in accordance with section 3.

8 Notwithstanding the provision of any Town and Country Planning General Permitted or Special Development Order for the time being in force, the areas shown on SK07 A for parking spaces, turning areas and access shall be kept available for their intended purposes at all times.

9 No development shall take place until the applicant has provided for the approval in writing of the Local Planning Authority a Design Stage Code for Sustainable Homes Certificate for each dwelling type comprised in the development to be carried out by a BREEAM or STROMA licensed accredited Code assessor that achieves Code level 4 or higher. The Code Level to be achieved will be a minimum of:

* Code Level 4 for dwellings to be completed between 2011 and 2015, and * Code Level 6 for dwellings to be completed after 2015

Development shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details. A Post Construction Stage Certificate for each dwelling/dwelling type assessed shall be provided to the Local Planning Authority in writing, confirming that the required Code level has been met, prior to the first occupation of the first dwelling comprised in the development to which the certificate relates

Reasons for Conditions:-

1 To ensure compliance with Sections 91-94 of the Town and Country Planning Act

18 1990. 2 To secure the satisfactory implementation of the proposal. 3 In order to ensure that the materials used conform to the amenity requirements of the locality. 4 In the interests of visual amenity. 5 In the interests of visual amenity. 6 To prevent pollution of the water environment. 7 To ensure that risks from land contamination to the future users of the land and neighbouring land are minimised, together with those to controlled waters, property and ecological systems, and to ensure that the development can be carried out safely without unacceptable risks to workers, neighbours and other offsite receptors in accordance with policies SG4 and EQ1 of the Harrogate District Core Strategy. 8 In accordance with Harrogate District Local Development Framework Core Strategy Policy SG4 and to ensure these areas are kept available for their intended use in the interests of highway safety and the general amenity of the development. 9 To safeguard the environment and mitigate climate change in accordance with Harrogate District Core Strategy Policy EQ1.

JUSTIFICATION FOR GRANTING CONSENT

Since consideration of the earlier approved application there has been a change in planning circumstances trough the adoption of the Harrogate District Local Development Framework Core Strategy. The broad land use principle of residential development is acceptable on this plot and would comply with the sustainability objectives of Harrogate District Local Development Framework Core Strategy Policy SG1, sG2 and the regional Spatial Strategy Policy YH4 and YH7 in terms of the location requirement of new development. Having regard to the earlier appeal inspectors decision notice, it is considered that whilst the development would result in the loss of potential employment facilities, this issue would not represent a substantive reason to oppose the application under Harrogate District Local Plan Policy E2 or Core Strategy Policy JB3The design and general form of the development accords with Harrogate District Local Plan Policy HD20 and Core Strategy Policy SG4 . The existing buildings to be demolished make no contribution to the conservation area, whilst the character of the conservation area would be retained through the redevelopment scheme. In this respect the scheme accords with advice contained within Local Plan Policy HD3. The scheme provides a satisfactory residential environment subject to closure of the proposed Robert Street vehicle access. Subject to the imposition of an additional condition to ensure that the development is in constructed in accordance with the Code for Sustainable Homes as required by the provisions of Core Strategy Policy EQ1 there has been no change in material circumstances to prevent a further consent from being granted.

CASE NUMBER: 10/05325/ADV WARD: Low Harrogate CASE OFFICER: Mrs N M Waddington DATE VALID: 06.12.2010 GRID REF: E 430227 TARGET DATE: 31.01.2011 N 455342 DECISION DATE: 26.01.2011

APPLICATION NO: 6.79.826.Q.ADV

19 LOCATION: 36 - 38 Cambridge Street Harrogate North Yorkshire HG1 1RX

PROPOSAL: Display of 1 non-illuminated high level sign to replace existing lettering and 1 set of halo lluminated lettering to Oxford Street fascia.

APPLICANT: Primark Stores

APPROVED subject to the following conditions:-

1 The proposal hereby permitted shall only be carried out in strict accordance with drawing number DraTTG Harrogate AR106 Rev 1.1, dated 06.12.2010, received by the Local Planning Authority on 5 January 2011, and as modified by the conditions of this consent.

2 The powder coated aluminium backing panel to the non illuminated high level sign shall have a matt finish.

Reasons for Conditions:-

1 For the avoidance of doubt and in the interests of proper planning. 2 In the interests of visual amenity.

JUSTIFICATION FOR GRANTING CONSENT

The signage scheme is considered acceptable in the context of the application site and is not considered to result in harm to amenity or public safety. The proposal accords with the provisions of the development plan.

CASE NUMBER: 10/05339/FUL WARD: Low Harrogate CASE OFFICER: Ms Hannah Morrall DATE VALID: 14.12.2010 GRID REF: E 429949 TARGET DATE: 08.02.2011 N 455975 DECISION DATE: 26.01.2011

APPLICATION NO: 6.79.12156.FUL

LOCATION: 8 Coppice Drive Harrogate North Yorkshire HG1 2JE

PROPOSAL: Retention of single storey rear extension.

20 APPLICANT: Mr And Mrs Evans

APPROVED

JUSTIFICATION FOR GRANTING CONSENT

The scale, design and materials of the extension respect the host property and the character and appearance of the conservation area. The development would not harm the amenities of adjacent residents. The proposal therefore accords with guidance in Planning Policy Statement 1 and 5, Saved Policies H15, HD20 and HD3 of the Harrogate District Local Plan and Policies SG4, EQ1 and EQ2 of the Harrogate District Core Strategy DPD (adopted 2009) and 'The House Extensions and Garages Design Guide' (SPD).

CASE NUMBER: 10/05425/CON WARD: Low Harrogate CASE OFFICER: Mr A Hough DATE VALID: 08.12.2010 GRID REF: E 430446 TARGET DATE: 02.02.2011 N 454826 DECISION DATE: 01.02.2011

APPLICATION NO: 6.79.2060.M.CON

LOCATION: Norwood House Rear Of 17 York Place Harrogate North Yorkshire

PROPOSAL: Conservation area application for demolition of workshops.

APPLICANT: York Place Mews LLP

APPROVED subject to the following conditions:-

1 The works to which this consent relates must be begun on or before 01.02.2014.

2 The demolition hereby permitted shall not be undertaken before a contract for the carrying out of the works of redevelopment of the site has been made and planning permission has been granted for the redevelopment for which the contract provides.

21 Reasons for Conditions:-

1 To ensure compliance with Section 18 of the Planning (Listed Building and Conservation Area) Act 1990. 2 In the interests of the visual amenity of the locality and to avoid a gap site within the conservation area.

JUSTIFICATION FOR GRANTING CONSENT

The existing buildings formerly functioned as stables or as a coach house for the properties in York Place. The structure has been extended and significantly altered over time and now make little, if any contribution to the character of this part of the conservation area. It is therefore concluded that the demolition of the structures would be acceptable under the provisions of Harrogate District Local Plan Policy HD3 and would not conflict with national Planning Policy contained within Planning Policy Statement 5: Planning for the Historic Environment subject to a controlling condition ensuring the appropriate redevelopment of the site.

CASE NUMBER: 11/00041/DISCON WARD: Low Harrogate CASE OFFICER: Phil Jewkes DATE VALID: 04.01.2011 GRID REF: E 429872 TARGET DATE: 01.03.2011 N 455379 DECISION DATE: 25.01.2011

APPLICATION NO: 6.79.1035.AB.DISCO N

LOCATION: The Crown Hotel Crown Place Royal Parade Harrogate North Yorkshire HG1 2RZ

PROPOSAL: Application for approval of details required by condition 3 of permission 6.79.1035.AB.LB in regards to panel details, the colour of the joinery of doors, colour of fire escape stairs and balustrades and re-use of leaded and stained glass.

APPLICANT: Crown Hotel

CONFIRMATION of discharge of condition(s)

22 CASE NUMBER: 10/05093/REP WARD: Marston Moor CASE OFFICER: Mr A Hough DATE VALID: 10.12.2010 GRID REF: E 450250 TARGET DATE: 04.02.2011 N 451200 DECISION DATE: 01.02.2011

APPLICATION NO: 6.125.54.I.REP

LOCATION: Land Adjacent To Fairfax Cottage York Road Long Marston North Yorkshire

PROPOSAL: Replacement planning permission for the erection of 1 dwelling 6.125.54.H.RENEW (Expiry date 03.03.2011) renewal of unimplemented Permission 6.125.54.C.OA for the erection of 1 dwelling (Site Area 0.03ha).

APPLICANT: Mr And Mrs J And E Nice

APPROVED subject to the following conditions:-

1 Application for the approval of the reserved matters shall be made to the Local Planning Authority not later than 2yrs. The development hereby permitted shall be begun on or before the expiration of one year from the final approval of reserved matters or in the case of approval on different dates, the final approval of the last such matter to be approved.

2 No development shall take place without the prior written approval of the Local Planning Authority of all details of the following reserved matters -

(a) access; (b) appearance (c) landscaping (d) layout; and (e) scale.

Thereafter the development shall not be carried out otherwise than in strict accordance with the approved details.

3 Any application for approval of reserved matters under this outline permission shall be accompanied by a revised design and access statement covering the following information and or issues - Layout and scale having regard to adjacent property

4 Prior to the completion of any other part of the development hereby permitted, the access(es) to the site shall be laid out and constructed in accordance with the following requirements:- (ic) the crossing of the highway verge and/or footpath shall be constructed in

23 accordance with the approved details and/or Standard Detail number E6a and the Specification of the Local Highway Authority. (ii) any gates, barriers or other means of enclosure shall be erected a minimum distance of 6 metres back from the carriageway of the existing highway and shall open into the site; (v) provision shall be made to prevent surface water from the site discharging onto the existing or proposed highway in accordance with the approved details and/or Standard Detail number E6a and the Specification of the Local Highway Authority.

NOTE:You are advised that a separate licence will be required from the Local Highway Authority in order to allow any works in the adopted highway to be carried out. The local office of the Local Highway Authority will also be pleased to provide the detailed constructional specification referred to in this condition.

5 There shall be no means of vehicular access to or from the application site other than from the south eastern corner of the plot frontage unless otherwise approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority.

6 Prior to the commencement of the development hereby permitted being brought into use, sight lines shall be provided at the access to the site, offering clear visibility to the extremities of the site frontage including land outlined in blue on the plans submitted, from point on the centre-line of the access, 2 metres back from the nearside edge of the carriageway. Thereafter the area between the sight lines and the highway boundary shall remain clear of any obstruction in excess of 1 metre in height above the adjoining carriageway level.

7 The dwelling shall not be occupied until parking spaces of a size not less than 4.8 metres x 2.4metres, including one garage or a car parking space capable of accommodating a garage, have been provided within the curtilage of the dwelling, in accordance with standards set out in the North Yorkshire County Council Transport & Development – A Guide 2003. Any garages shall then be positioned a minimum of 6 metres back from the highway boundary. Once created these parking and garaging areas shall be maintained clear of any obstruction and retained for their intended purpose at all times.

8 No development shall take place until the applicant has provided for the approval in writing of the Local Planning Authority a Design Stage Code for Sustainable Homes Certificate for each dwelling type comprised in the development to be carried out by a BREEAM or STROMA licensed accredited Code assessor that achieves Code level 4 or higher. The Code Level to be achieved will be a minimum of:

* Code Level 4 for dwellings to be completed between 2011 and 2015, and * Code Level 6 for dwellings to be completed after 2015

Development shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details. A Post Construction Stage Certificate for each dwelling/dwelling type assessed shall be provided to the Local Planning Authority in writing, confirming that the required Code level has been met, prior to the first occupation of the first dwelling comprised in the

24 development to which the certificate relates

9 The application for Reserved Matters shall include either: i) Full details of open space and village hall contributions to serve the development in accordance with Policy C1 of the Harrogate District Local Development Framework Core Strategy to be submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority and agreement has been reached with the Local Planning Authority as to provision of the same and its subsequent management and maintenance.

ii) Alternative arrangements for the provision of open space and village hall contributions have been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority.

Reasons for Conditions:-

1 To ensure compliance with sections 91-94 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. 2 To safeguard the rights of control by the Local Planning Authority in respect of the reserved matters. 3 To ensure the delivery of sustainable development and facilitate community involvement and informed decision making as explained in Planning Policy Statement 1. 4 To ensure a satisfactory means of access to the site from the public highway, in the interests of vehicle and pedestrian safety and convenience. 5 In the interests of road safety to provide for drivers of vehicles using the access road to the site and the public highway with a standard of inter-visibility commensurate with the vehicular traffic flow and road conditions. 6 To ensure appropriate on-site vehicle parking facilities with associated access and manoeuvring areas, in the interests of highway safety and the general amenity of the development. 7 To provide for adequate and satisfactory provision of off-street accommodation for vehicles generated by occupiers of the dwellings and visitors to them, in the interest of safety and the general amenity of the development. 8 To safeguard the environment and mitigate climate change in accordance with Harrogate District Core Strategy Policy EQ1. 9 In order to secure compliance with Core Strategy Policy C1 of the Local Development Framework in relation to the provision of open space and village hall contributions for residential development.

JUSTIFICATION FOR GRANTING CONSENT

The broad land use principle of development is considered to be in compliance with the sustainable approach towards new housing provision identified within national, regional and local planning policy. The proposed development is considered to accord with the provisions of Harrogate District Local Development Framework Core Strategy Policy SG2.

25 Satisfactory access can be provided to the site, however concern is expressed in relation to the submitted details contained within the supporting Design and Access Statement. The dimension identified could result in a dwelling that dominates the plot. Accepting the principle of the development and the fact that all matters are reserved for subsequent approval, it is considered that the reserved matters application should be accompanied with a new design and access statement. Subject to the imposition of controlling conditions there are no reasons why replacement planning permission should not be granted.

CASE NUMBER: 10/05171/FUL WARD: Marston Moor CASE OFFICER: Mr Andrew Siddall DATE VALID: 07.12.2010 GRID REF: E 447105 TARGET DATE: 01.02.2011 N 451796 DECISION DATE: 26.01.2011

APPLICATION NO: 6.124.469.FUL

LOCATION: Land Comprising Field At 447105 451796 Tockwith Lane Tockwith North Yorkshire

PROPOSAL: Erection of detached stable block.

APPLICANT: Mr And Mrs Corbett

APPROVED subject to the following conditions:-

1 The development hereby permitted shall be begun on or before 26.01.2014.

2 Development shall be undertaken in accordance with the submitted details comprising drawings numbered 510/336 received by the Local Planning Authority on 22nd November 2010 and 25th January 2011

Reasons for Conditions:-

1 To ensure compliance with Sections 91-94 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. 2 In the interests of proper planning and for the avoidance of doubt

JUSTIFICATION FOR GRANTING CONSENT

The proposal represents acceptable development in this location. The building is small in scale and does not harm existing levels of visual amenity or the character of the surrounding landscape. It has no impact on residential amenity or the setting of the

26 adjacent historic battlefield and therefore complies with the requirements of the development plan.

CASE NUMBER: 10/05158/FUL WARD: Mashamshire CASE OFFICER: Mr Mark Danforth DATE VALID: 07.12.2010 GRID REF: E 416017 TARGET DATE: 01.02.2011 N 480265 DECISION DATE: 20.01.2011

APPLICATION NO: 6.6.41.C.FUL

LOCATION: Pinewood Manor Healey Ripon North Yorkshire HG4 4LW

PROPOSAL: Erection of first floor balcony on the front and side elevation.

APPLICANT: Ms E. Warner-Reed

APPROVED subject to the following conditions:-

1 The development hereby permitted shall be begun on or before 20.01.2014.

2 The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in strict accordance with the submitted plans reference 3002-002 Revision P and 004 received by the Local Planning Authority on the 22 November 2010.

Reasons for Conditions:-

1 To ensure compliance with Sections 91-94 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. 2 In order to ensure compliance with the approved drawings.

JUSTIFICATION FOR GRANTING CONSENT

The proposal represents a suitably scaled addition to the property, the design of which reflects that of the host property. The proposal will therefore have a neutral impact on the character and appearance of the area. In addition adequate separation distances exist between the application property and neighbouring houses ensuring that the proposal does not materially harm existing levels of amenity. The proposal therefore accords with the provisions of the development plan.

27 CASE NUMBER: 10/05484/OHLEXP WARD: Mashamshire CASE OFFICER: Mr A Moxon DATE VALID: 17.12.2010 GRID REF: E 420595 TARGET DATE: 28.01.2011 N 482779 DECISION DATE: 25.01.2011

APPLICATION NO: 6.1.17.OHLEXP

LOCATION: Sutton Barn Sutton Lane High Ellington Ripon North Yorkshire HG4 4PB

PROPOSAL: Notification to convert 9 spans of overhead low voltage network to ABC operation.

APPLICANT: Northern Electric Distribution Limited

Subject to NO OBJECTIONS

1 The District/Borough Council/Authority: Harrogate Borough Council

(i) does not object for the proposed development detailed above to be undertaken under the exemptions laid down in the Overhead Lines (Exemption)(England and Wales) Regulations 2009.

(ii) does not wish the Secretary of State to consider the application using the full section 37 process under the Electricity Act 1989.

Reasons for Conditions:-

CASE NUMBER: 10/05230/FUL WARD: Nidd Valley CASE OFFICER: Mr Mark Danforth DATE VALID: 13.12.2010 GRID REF: E 417227 TARGET DATE: 07.02.2011 N 461899 DECISION DATE: 26.01.2011

APPLICATION NO: 6.65.259.FUL

LOCATION: Holme Farm Barn Heyshaw Harrogate North Yorkshire HG3 4HD

PROPOSAL: Retention of Flue.

APPLICANT:

28 Mr P Hughes

APPROVED

JUSTIFICATION FOR GRANTING CONSENT

The proposal represents a suitably coloured flue albeit it is overly tall particularly on a barn. The proposal will therefore have some impact on the character and appearance of the Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty however in the circumstances it is considered acceptable in this instance. In addition adequate separation distances exist between the application property and neighbouring houses ensuring that the proposal does not materially harm existing levels of amenity. The proposal therefore accords with the provisions of the development plan.

CASE NUMBER: 10/03682/AMENDS WARD: Ouseburn CASE OFFICER: Mrs K Williams DATE VALID: 16.08.2010 GRID REF: E 444586 TARGET DATE: 13.09.2010 N 461991 DECISION DATE: 24.01.2011

APPLICATION NO: 6.80.120.E.AMENDS

LOCATION: The Forge Main Street Great Ouseburn York North Yorkshire YO26 9RF

PROPOSAL: Application for a non material amendment for resiting of 2 roof lights and installation of 1 roof light in relation to planning permission 10/01893/FUL - Conversion of outbuilding to form annexe.

APPLICANT: Mrs K Swann

APPROVED subject to the following conditions:-

1 The development hereby permitted shall not be carried out otherwise than in strict accordance with the submitted details, as amended by letter and or drawings received by the Council of the Borough of Harrogate on the 27 October 2010 and as modified by the conditions of this consent.

Reasons for Conditions:-

29 1 In order to ensure that the development is carried out in accordance with the approved drawings.

CASE NUMBER: 10/05481/FUL WARD: Ouseburn CASE OFFICER: Mr Mark Danforth DATE VALID: 16.12.2010 GRID REF: E 444544 TARGET DATE: 10.02.2011 N 460679 DECISION DATE: 01.02.2011

APPLICATION NO: 6.88.81.FUL

LOCATION: Police House Main Street Little Ouseburn York North Yorkshire YO26 9TD

PROPOSAL: Erection of single storey front and two storey rear and side extensions.

APPLICANT: Mr M Lawrence

APPROVED subject to the following conditions:-

1 The development hereby permitted shall be begun on or before 01.02.2014.

2 The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in strict accordance with the submitted plans reference Job No 2010.049 Drawing No 002 Revision D received by the Local Planning Authority on the 12 January 2011.

3 A sample panel of the type, texture and colour of render to be used shall be erected on the site for the written approval of the local planning authority prior to the commencement of development and shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details.

Reasons for Conditions:-

1 To ensure compliance with Sections 91-94 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. 2 In order to ensure compliance with the approved drawings. 3 In the interests of visual amenity.

JUSTIFICATION FOR GRANTING CONSENT

The proposal represents a suitably scaled addition to the property, the design of which

30 reflects that of the host property. The proposal will therefore have a neutral impact on the character and appearance of the area. In addition adequate separation distances exist between the application property and neighbouring houses ensuring that the proposal does not materially harm existing levels of privacy and amenity. The proposal therefore accords with the provisions of the development plan.

CASE NUMBER: 10/05153/FUL WARD: Pateley Bridge CASE OFFICER: Mr A Moxon DATE VALID: 09.12.2010 GRID REF: E 407431 TARGET DATE: 03.02.2011 N 476834 DECISION DATE: 01.02.2011

APPLICATION NO: 6.16.49.FUL

LOCATION: Land Adjacent To And North Of Access Track 745m East Of Scar House Reservoir New Houses North Yorkshire

PROPOSAL: Erection of pumping station.

APPLICANT: Yorkshire Water Services

APPROVED subject to the following conditions:-

1 The development hereby permitted shall be begun on or before 01.02.2014.

2 The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the submitted details, drawing numbers 20101142 Rev B with the exception of the roof tiles indicated which are the subject of condition 4 below.

3 Prior to the commencement of development a sample panel of the type of stone to be used showing the proposed coursing and pointing shall be erected on the site for the written approval of the local planning authority and, once approved, the walls hereby approved shall thereafter be constructed in accordance with the approved detail

4 Prior to commencement of any development and notwithstanding the submitted details a sample of an alternative type of roofing material shall be made available for inspection for the written approval of the Local Planning Authority and, once approved, the roof hereby approved shall thereafter be constructed in accordance with the approved detail. (NB. The use of Marley modern in this location is not acceptable).

5 An ecological inspection shall be undertaken prior to the commencement of works to check that there are no reptiles or nesting birds which may be adversely impacted by

31 the development. Should any protected species be found a method statement for mitigation shall be agreed in writing with the local planning authority prior to the commencement of works.

Reasons for Conditions:-

1 To ensure compliance with Sections 91-94 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. 2 For the avoidance and doubt and in the interests of proper planning. 3 In order to protect the landscape character of the area given its sensitivity. 4 In order to protect the landscape character of the area given its sensitivity. 5 In the interests of protected species.

INFORMATIVES

1. It is advised that the use of marley modern roof tiles is not appropriate in this location and a good quality imitation stone tile be used.

JUSTIFICATION FOR GRANTING CONSENT

The development would not harm the spatial quality of this part of the Nidderdale Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty or the existing levels of recreational amenity visitors to the locality. However the use of Marley Modern roofing tiles is not acceptable and a condition is added to ensure a better tile is used. The proposal accords with the provisions of the development plan.

CASE NUMBER: 10/05125/FUL WARD: Ribston CASE OFFICER: Mr M A Warden DATE VALID: 29.11.2010 GRID REF: E 444817 TARGET DATE: 24.01.2011 N 455758 DECISION DATE: 24.01.2011

APPLICATION NO: 6.113.72.L.FUL

LOCATION: Johnsons Of Whixley Cattal Nurseries Cattal Street Cattal York North Yorkshire YO26 8AQ

PROPOSAL: Erection of four polythene tunnels.

APPLICANT: Johnsons Of Whixley

APPROVED subject to the following conditions:-

32 1 The development hereby permitted shall be begun on or before 24.01.2014.

2 No development approved by this permission shall be commenced until a scheme for the provision of surface water drainage works has been approved by the Local Planning Authority. Such scheme shall provide soakaways together with permeability calculations and the scheme once approved shall be implemented to the reasonable satisfaction of the Local Planning Authority before the development is brought into use.

3 The development hereby permitted shall not be carried out otherwise than in strict accordance with the submitted details as modified by the other conditions of this consent.

Reasons for Conditions:-

1 To ensure compliance with Sections 91-94 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. 2 To prevent the increased risk of flooding by ensuring the provision of a satisfactory means of surface water disposal. 3 To secure the satisfactory implementation of the proposal.

JUSTIFICATION FOR GRANTING CONSENT

The proposal would have no significant impact on neighbouring properties or the surrounding area and the development complies with planning policies.

CASE NUMBER: 10/05177/FUL WARD: Rossett CASE OFFICER: Ms Hannah Morrall DATE VALID: 07.12.2010 GRID REF: E 428975 TARGET DATE: 01.02.2011 N 453634 DECISION DATE: 26.01.2011

APPLICATION NO: 6.79.12152.FUL

LOCATION: 2 Beckwith Walk Harrogate North Yorkshire HG2 0BP

PROPOSAL: Erection of replacement single storey side extension.

APPLICANT: Mrs S Grunnill

APPROVED subject to the following conditions:-

33 1 The development hereby permitted shall be begun on or before 26.01.2014.

2 The development hereby permitted shall not be carried out otherwise than in strict accordance with the details shown on the following drawing:

Drawings number 2BW/PL01A received on the 7th December 2010.

3 The external materials of the extension hereby approved shall match the existing materials of the dwelling house.

Reasons for Conditions:-

1 To ensure compliance with Sections 91-94 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. 2 In avoidance of doubt and in the interests of proper planning. 3 In the interests of visual amenity in accordance with Policies H15 and HD20 of the Harrogate District Local Plan and Policy SG4 of the Harrogate District Core Strategy DPD.

JUSTIFICATION FOR GRANTING CONSENT

The scale, design and materials would respect the host property and the character and appearance of the area. The development would not harm the amenities of adjacent residents. The proposal therefore accords with guidance in Planning Policy Statement 1, Saved Policies H15 and HD20 of the Harrogate District Local Plan and Policies SG4, EQ1 and EQ2 of the Harrogate District Core Strategy DPD (adopted 2009) and 'The House Extensions and Garages Design Guide' (SPD).

CASE NUMBER: 10/05259/FUL WARD: Rossett CASE OFFICER: Phil Jewkes DATE VALID: 10.12.2010 GRID REF: E 429791 TARGET DATE: 04.02.2011 N 453745 DECISION DATE: 01.02.2011

APPLICATION NO: 6.79.12157.FUL

LOCATION: 121 Arthurs Avenue Harrogate North Yorkshire HG2 0EH

PROPOSAL: Erection of rear conservatory and front porch.

APPLICANT: Miss Dinsdale

APPROVED subject to the following conditions:-

34 1 The development hereby permitted shall be begun on or before 01.02.2014.

2 The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in strict accordance with the submitted plans reference 20438 01 received by the Local Planning Authority on the 1 December 2010.

Reasons for Conditions:-

1 To ensure compliance with Sections 91-94 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. 2 In order to ensure compliance with the approved drawings.

INFORMATIVES

1. This property is situated within one hundred metres of a known great crested newt breeding pond at Rossett Local Nature Reserve. Contractors should be made aware of the potential presence of Great Crested Newts. A check should be made for great crested newts immediately prior to the commencement of development. Any objects on the ground that may act as potential refuges should be lifted upwards directly with care. In the unlikely event that great crested newts are detected, works should cease and either Natural England or a licenced great crested newt worker should be contacted for advice and the local planning authority should be informed.

JUSTIFICATION FOR GRANTING CONSENT

The proposed extension reflects the design and appearance of the application dwelling. There is adequate separation distance between the proposed extension and the adjacent dwellings to ensure that the proposal does not materially harm existing levels of privacy and amenity. The extension would not have any significant detrimental impact on the street scene. The proposal therefore accords with the provisions of the development plan.

CASE NUMBER: 10/05304/DISCON WARD: Ripon Minster CASE OFFICER: Mrs N M Waddington DATE VALID: 02.12.2010 GRID REF: E 431263 TARGET DATE: 27.01.2011 N 471237 DECISION DATE: 26.01.2011

APPLICATION NO: 6.31.100.Y.DISCON

LOCATION: Unicorn Hotel 2 Market Place Ripon North Yorkshire HG4 1BP

PROPOSAL: Application to approve details required under condition 3 relating to a sound insulation scheme, condition 4 relating to details of the mechanical extraction ventilation system,

35 condition 5 relating to submission of further drawings and condition 6 relating to approval of samples, of permission 6.31.100.Y.FUL.

APPLICANT: JD Wetherspoon Plc

CONFIRMATION of discharge of condition(s)

INFORMATIVES

1. Condition 3. PARTIALLY DISCHARGED. Environmental Health accept the conditions of the report subject to the mitigation measures and specifications being adopted. The condition can not be fully discharged until a validation report is provided on completion of the works. The condition is therefore partially discharged, and the remainder of the condition requires formal discharge prior to the commencement of use.

Condition 4. DISCHARGED. Environmental Health accept the details provided subject to the installation being carried out in accordance with the specifications and plans provided.

Condition 5. DISCHARGED. The agent has opted to under implement the scheme and no longer intends to install the two sets of double doors and therefore it is no longer relevant to discharge the first section of the condition. In connection with the second section a plan has been provided showing the cross section and design of the new door which is to be painted to match the external joinery, and is acceptable.

Condition 6. DISCHARGED. The agent has opted to under implement the scheme and no longer intends to install the ramp and therefore the first two sections of this condition are no longer relevant and do not require formal discharge. In connection with the third section a sample flag of cast reconstituted stone has been inspected, the sample was square, and the agent has agreed the flags used will be rectangular which is acceptable.

2. This consent does not convey approval for the details shown on the floor plans which differ from the approved scheme and must form the subject a revised application for Listed Building Consent. For full details of the approved plans please refer to condition 2 of planning application 10/03569/FUL dated 12.11.2010.

CASE NUMBER: 10/05306/DISCON WARD: Ripon Minster CASE OFFICER: Mrs N M Waddington DATE VALID: 02.12.2010 GRID REF: E 431263 TARGET DATE: 27.01.2011 N 471237 DECISION DATE: 26.01.2011

APPLICATION NO: 6.31.100.X.DISCON

36 APPLICATION NO: 6.31.100.X.DISCON

LOCATION: Unicorn Hotel 2 Market Place Ripon North Yorkshire HG4 1BP

PROPOSAL: Application to approve details required under condition 3 relating to submission of further drawings and condition 4 relating to approval of samples, of permission 6.31.100.X.LB.

APPLICANT: JD Wetherspoon Plc

CONFIRMATION of discharge of condition(s)

INFORMATIVES

1. Condition 3. DISCHARGED. The agent has opted to under implement the scheme and no longer intends to install the two sets of double doors and therefore it is no longer relevant to discharge the first section of the condition. In connection with the second section a plan has been provided showing the cross section and design of the new door which is to be painted to match the external joinery, and is acceptable.

Condition 4. DISCHARGED. The agent has opted to under implement the scheme and no longer intends to install the ramp and therefore the first two sections of this condition are no longer relevant and do not require formal discharge. In connection with the third section a sample flag of cast reconstituted stone has been inspected, the sample was square, and the agent has agreed the flags used will be rectangular which is acceptable. 2. This consent does not convey approval for the details shown on the floor plans which differ from the approved scheme and must form the subject a revised application for Listed Building Consent. For full details of the approved plans please refer to condition 2 of planning application 10/02388/LB dated 12.11.2010.

CASE NUMBER: 10/05189/FUL WARD: Stray CASE OFFICER: Ms Hannah Morrall DATE VALID: 07.12.2010 GRID REF: E 430285 TARGET DATE: 01.02.2011 N 454475 DECISION DATE: 26.01.2011

APPLICATION NO: 6.79.11987.E.FUL

LOCATION: Inglehurst Park Drive Harrogate North Yorkshire HG2 9AY

37 PROPOSAL: Erection of access steps, 1m high railings and enlargement existing of lightwell.

APPLICANT: Mr And Mrs M Newton

APPROVED subject to the following conditions:-

1 The development hereby permitted shall be begun on or before 26.01.2014.

2 The development hereby permitted shall not be carried out otherwise than in strict accordance with the details shown on the following drawing:

Drawing number IPD/PL20 received on the 7th December 2010.

Reasons for Conditions:-

1 To ensure compliance with Sections 91-94 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. 2 In avoidance of doubt and in the interests of proper planning.

JUSTIFICATION FOR GRANTING CONSENT

The scale, design and materials of the proposal would respect the host property and the character and appearance of the area. The development would not harm the amenities of adjacent residents. The proposal therefore accords with guidance in Planning Policy Statement 1 and 5, Saved Policies H15, HD20 and HD3 of the Harrogate District Local Plan and Policies SG4, EQ1 and EQ2 of the Harrogate District Core Strategy DPD (adopted 2009) and 'The House Extensions and Garages Design Guide' (SPD).

CASE NUMBER: 10/05252/TPO WARD: Stray CASE OFFICER: Ms Hannah Morrall DATE VALID: 30.11.2010 GRID REF: E 431223 TARGET DATE: 25.01.2011 N 454595 DECISION DATE: 25.01.2011

APPLICATION NO: 6.79.765.BG.TPO

LOCATION: St Aidans Church Of England High School Oatlands Drive Harrogate North Yorkshire HG2 8JR

PROPOSAL: Felling of 1 Horse Chestnut, lateral reduction of 1 Sycamore, 2 Lime, 1 Horse Chestnut, 1 Acer, 1 Willow and 2 Oak trees within woodland W2 of Tree Preservation Order No.

38 25/1996.

APPLICANT: St Aidans Church Of England High School

APPROVED subject to the following conditions:-

1 The works shall be completed within two years from the date of this decision.

2 This consent allows for the lateral reduction, by a maximum of 3m or to a point not in excess of 35mm diameter over bark only, to the Sycamore identified as T1 on the submitted plans, Lime trees T3 and T4, Horse Chestnut T5, Acer T6, Willow T7 and two Oaks T8 and T9. The works shall be carried out by a trained Arborist in accordance with British Standards 3998 (2010) Works to trees.

Reasons for Conditions:-

1 In the interests of the health and amenity of the trees. 2 In the interests of good arboricultural practice.

CASE NUMBER: 10/03848/DISCON WARD: Washburn CASE OFFICER: Mr Gerard Walsh DATE VALID: 26.08.2010 GRID REF: E 426614 TARGET DATE: 21.10.2010 N 452485 DECISION DATE: 25.01.2011

APPLICATION NO: 6.120.19.G.DISCON

LOCATION: Higher Shaw Farm Beckwithshaw North Yorkshire

PROPOSAL: Application for approval of details reserved by conditions 3 and 10 of permission 6.120.19.G.FUL relating to materials and bat mitigation measures.

APPLICANT: The Main Furniture Company

CONFIRMATION of discharge of condition(s)

INFORMATIVES

39 1. The discharge of Condition No 3 is in relation to the details submitted on 26 August 2010 as amended by the drawings submitted to the planning authority on 17 January 2011. The discharge of condition No. 10 is in relation to the letter and mitigation report from John Drewett submitted to the planning authority on 26 August 2010.

None of the other conditions attached to the planning permission need to be formally discharged but the development should be carried out in accordance with the requirements of these conditions. If you are in any doubt as to what these conditions require you should contact the planning authority for clarification.

CASE NUMBER: 10/05138/PDUCO WARD: Washburn CASE OFFICER: Mr Andrew Siddall DATE VALID: 07.12.2010 GRID REF: E 416620 TARGET DATE: 01.02.2011 N 452649 DECISION DATE: 01.02.2011

APPLICATION NO: 6.131.73.C.PDUCO

LOCATION: High Moor Barn Timble North Yorkshire LS21 2NJ

PROPOSAL: Erection of single storey rear extension.

APPLICANT: Mr C Dibb

APPROVED subject to the following conditions:-

1 The development hereby permitted shall be begun on or before 01.02.2014.

2 The development hereby permitted shall not be carried out otherwise than in strict accordance with the submitted details, as amended by letter and or drawings received by the Council of the Borough of Harrogate on the 28th January 2011 and as modified by the conditions of this consent.

3 Prior to commencement of development a sample panel of the proposed external stonework and samples of the proposed external roofing material shall be made available on site for the written approval of the local planning authority. Such panel shall measure 1 square metre in area and demonstrate the type, size, colour, pointing, dressing and coursing of the stone to be used. Thereafter the development shall be constructed as approved.

4 Notwithstanding the provisions of The Town and Country Planning General Permitted Development Order 1995 (or any order revoking and re-enacting that Order with or

40 without modification), no further windows or doors shall be inserted into any elevation of the development hereby approved, without the prior written approval of the Local Planning Authority.

Reasons for Conditions:-

1 To ensure compliance with Sections 91-94 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. 2 In order to ensure that the development is carried out in accordance with the approved drawings. 3 In the interests of visual amenity and in order to harmonise with the existing building. 4 In the interests of visual amenity and landscape character

JUSTIFICATION FOR GRANTING CONSENT

The proposal represents a small scale addition to this residential rural building conversion. The proposal has a neutral impact on the character and appearance of the existing building and the appearance of this part of the Nidderdale AONB. It does not harm existing levels of residential amenity and therefore accords with the provisions of the development plan.

CASE NUMBER: 10/05346/FUL WARD: Washburn CASE OFFICER: Phil Jewkes DATE VALID: 06.12.2010 GRID REF: E 426965 TARGET DATE: 31.01.2011 N 452410 DECISION DATE: 26.01.2011

APPLICATION NO: 6.120.28.H.FUL

LOCATION: Shaw Green Farm Shaw Lane Beckwithshaw Harrogate North Yorkshire HG3 1RA

PROPOSAL: Formation of vehicular access.

APPLICANT: Ms Sarah Stevenson

APPROVED subject to the following conditions:-

1 The development hereby permitted shall be begun on or before 26.01.2014.

2 The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in strict accordance with the amended plans reference 09/310/111A received by the Local Planning Authority on the 12 January 2011 and the amended 1:2500 site curtilage plan received by the

41 Local Planning Authority on the 26 January 2011.

3 The vehicular access to the site hereby approved shall be laid out and constructed in accordance with the following requirements:-

(i) the access shall be formed with 6 metre radius kerbs, to give a minimum carriageway width of 5 metres, and that part of the access road extending 10 metres into the site shall be constructed in accordance with standard detail number E7e and the specification of the Local Highway Authority.

(ii) any gates, barriers or other means of enclosure shall be erected a minimum distance of 10 metres back from the carriageway of the existing highway and shall open into the site;

(iii) provision shall be made to prevent surface water from the site discharging onto the existing or proposed highway in accordance with the approved details and/or standard detail number E7e and the specification of the Local Highway Authority.

4 On completion of the vehicular access hereby approved the existing vehicular access shall be permanently closed-off to vehicle traffic, but maintained open as a public right of way for pedestrian users with the highway and made good in accordance with details that shall first have been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority in consultation with the Local Highway Authority. After such closure, no new access shall be created without the prior approval of the Local Planning Authority.

5 Prior to the access hereby permitted being brought into use visibility splays providing clear visibility of 2.4 metres x 70 metres measured down the centre line of the access road and the nearside channel line of the major road shall be provided at the junction of the access road with the county highway at a height of 1 metre above the level of the adjacent carriageway. Once created, these visibility areas shall be maintained clear of any obstruction and retained for their intended purpose at all times.

6 A vehicle parking and turning area shall, at all times, be provided & maintained within the site so as to ensure that vehicles visiting the site can enter and leave the public highway in a forward gear.

Reasons for Conditions:-

1 To ensure compliance with Sections 91-94 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. 2 In order to ensure compliance with the approved drawings. 3 To ensure a satisfactory means of access to the site from the public highway, in the interests of vehicle and pedestrian safety and convenience. 4 In the interests of highway safety. 5 In the interests of road safety to provide for drivers of vehicles using the access road to the site and the public highway with a standard of inter-visibility commensurate with the vehicular traffic flows and road conditions.

42 6 To ensure appropriate on-site vehicle parking facilities with associated access and manoeuvring areas, in the interests of highway safety and the general amenity of the development.

INFORMATIVES

1. The existing Public Right of Way on the site must be protected and kept clear of any obstruction until such time as any alternative route has been provided and confirmed under an Order made under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990.

Applicants are advised to contact the County Council's Access and Public Rights of Way Manager at County Hall, Northallerton on 0845 8 727374 to obtain up-to-date information regarding the line of the route of the way. The applicant should discuss with the Highway Authority any proposals for altering the route.

You are advised that a separate licence will be required from the Local Highway Authority in order to allow any works in the adopted highway to be carried out. The local office of the Local Highway Authority will also be pleased to provide the detailed constructional specification referred to in this condition.

JUSTIFICATION FOR GRANTING CONSENT

The proposed vehicular access would not have any detrimental impact on residential amenity, the special landscape area or the green belt. The proposal therefore accords with the provisions of the development plan.

CASE NUMBER: 10/05351/FUL WARD: Washburn CASE OFFICER: Phil Jewkes DATE VALID: 06.12.2010 GRID REF: E 427022 TARGET DATE: 31.01.2011 N 450714 DECISION DATE: 26.01.2011

APPLICATION NO: 6.134.55.O.FUL

LOCATION: Highfield House High Moor Road North Rigton Leeds North Yorkshire LS17 0AE

PROPOSAL: Erection of conservatory.

APPLICANT: Mr J Shaw

APPROVED subject to the following conditions:-

1 The development hereby permitted shall be begun on or before 26.01.2014.

2 The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in strict accordance with the

43 submitted plans reference CO 860 01-C and C0 849 PA02-G received by the Local Planning Authority on the 6 December 2010.

Reasons for Conditions:-

1 To ensure compliance with Sections 91-94 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. 2 In order to ensure compliance with the approved drawings.

JUSTIFICATION FOR GRANTING CONSENT

The proposed extension reflects the design and appearance of the application dwelling. The extension is appropriate development in the green belt and would not have any detrimental impact on the openness of the green belt. The proposal therefore accords with the provisions of the development plan.

CASE NUMBER: 11/00053/CMA WARD: Washburn CASE OFFICER: Ms Hannah Morrall DATE VALID: 05.01.2011 GRID REF: E 416962 TARGET DATE: 02.02.2011 N 448329 DECISION DATE: 26.01.2011

APPLICATION NO: 6.131.10.M.CMA

LOCATION: Askwith County Primary School Askwith Lane Askwith Otley North Yorkshire LS21 2JB

PROPOSAL: Retention of Elliot Unit 1113.

APPLICANT: North Yorkshire County Council

Subject to NO OBJECTIONS with OBSERVATIONS as follows:-

1 The prefabricated unit is sited within the Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) and the West Riding Green Belt. The council has no objections to the retention of the prefabricated building, but would prefer it to be replaced with a more permanent structure that is more appropriate to the character and appearance of the AONB and surrounding Green Belt. The proposal therefore accords with guidance in Planning Policy Statement 1, 7, Planning Policy Guidance Note 2, Saved Policies HD20, C1 and GB1 of Harrogate District Local Plan and Core Strategy Policies SG3, SG4, EQ1 and EQ2. The approval should be temporary for three years.

44 Reasons for Conditions:-

CASE NUMBER: 10/04766/FUL WARD: Woodfield CASE OFFICER: Mrs G Pinna-Morrell DATE VALID: 27.10.2010 GRID REF: E 430885 TARGET DATE: 22.12.2010 N 456911 DECISION DATE: 25.01.2011

APPLICATION NO: 6.79.11133.A.FUL

LOCATION: 108 King Edwards Drive Harrogate North Yorkshire HG1 4HW

PROPOSAL: Erection of rear conservatory, detached garage and 1.6m entrance gates

APPLICANT: Modern Maison LTD

APPROVED subject to the following conditions:-

1 The development hereby permitted shall be begun on or before 25.01.2014.

2 The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in strict accordance with the amended plan received by the Local Planning Authority on 10.1.2011.

3 Notwithstanding the terms of condition 02 above, the small window panes (located 1.9m above ground level as shown on the side elevation of the approved drawing) shall be fitted with obscure glass in the side elevation facing no.104 King Edwards Drive and shall thereafter be retained and maintained as such.

Reasons for Conditions:-

1 To ensure compliance with Sections 91-94 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. 2 In the interests of proper planning and in order to define the planning permission. 3 In order to safeguard the level of privacy and amenity currently afforded to the occupants of the adjoining dwelling.

JUSTIFICATION FOR GRANTING CONSENT

The proposal represents appropriate additions to the host property, which retain the

45 overall appearance of the house and the spatial quality of the area along with safeguarding the level of amenity currently afforded to neighbouring property. The proposal therefore accords with the provisions of the development plan and there are no other material considerations in this instance that warrant setting aside local planning policies.

HARROGATE BOROUGH COUNCIL

PLANNING COMMITTEE

LIST OF APPLICATIONS DETERMINED BY THE HEAD OF PLANNING SERVICES AFTER CONSULTATION WITH THE CHAIRMAN or VICE-CHAIRMAN OF PLANNING COMMITTEE

CASE NUMBER: 10/04071/DVCON WARD: Bishop Monkton CASE OFFICER: Mrs K Williams DATE VALID: 21.09.2010 GRID REF: E 429250 TARGET DATE: 16.11.2010 N 465726 DECISION DATE: 24.01.2011

APPLICATION NO: 6.52.31.B.DVCON

LOCATION: Farnley Grange Markington Harrogate North Yorkshire HG3 3PQ

PROPOSAL: Application for a minor material modification in relation to permission 6.52.31.B.FUL to allow the alterations of fenestration and internal layout to form additional living accommodation to replace the approved garage and office space.

APPLICANT: Mr Clarke

APPROVED subject to the following conditions:-

1 The development hereby permitted shall be begun on or before 24.01.2014.

2 The development hereby permitted shall not be carried out otherwise than in strict accordance with the submitted details.

3 The window frames, of the development hereby permitted shall be constructed in timber and no other materials shall be used without the prior written consent of the

46 Local Planning Authority.

Reasons for Conditions:-

1 To ensure compliance with Sections 91-94 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. 2 In order to ensure compliance with the approved drawings. 3 In the interests of visual amenity.

JUSTIFICATION FOR GRANTING CONSENT

The proposal would not harm the character and appearance of the building or the character of the area. In addition adequate separation distances exist between it and neighbouring dwellings, which would ensure that the proposal would not have an unacceptable impact upon neighbouring residential amenity. Sufficient space for parking has been retained on site. The proposal accords with the provisions of PPS1, PPS3 Saved Harrogate District Local Plan (as amended 2004) Policy HD20, H15 and Core Strategy Policies SG1, SG2, SG4, EQ1 and EQ2.

CASE NUMBER: 10/04979/FUL WARD: Bishop Monkton CASE OFFICER: Mr A Moxon DATE VALID: 30.11.2010 GRID REF: E 431876 TARGET DATE: 25.01.2011 N 462942 DECISION DATE: 24.01.2011

APPLICATION NO: 6.67.22.C.FUL

LOCATION: Stainley Mill Limekiln Lane Burton Leonard Harrogate North Yorkshire HG3 3TE

PROPOSAL: Erection of single storey extension.

APPLICANT: Mr And Mrs S Falshaw

REFUSED. Reason(s) for refusal:-

1 The siting, appearance, design and materials of the proposed extension would have a poor relationship with the original building and would harm its character and appearance. In addition, the cumulative amount of addition to the dwelling would be out of scale with the original building. The proposal is therefore contrary to guidance in Planning Policy Statement 1, Saved Policies H15 and HD20 of the Harrogate District Local Plan, Policies SG4 and EQ2 of the Harrogate District Core Strategy DPD and guidance in the Supplementary Planning Document 'House Extensions and

47 Garages Design Guide' (2005).

CASE NUMBER: 10/05305/DVCON WARD: Bishop Monkton CASE OFFICER: Mr A Moxon DATE VALID: 02.12.2010 GRID REF: E 432650 TARGET DATE: 27.01.2011 N 466500 DECISION DATE: 24.01.2011

APPLICATION NO: 6.54.176.I.DVCON

LOCATION: Land Comprising Part Of Field 6400 Knaresborough Road Bishop Monkton North Yorkshire

PROPOSAL: Variation of condition 2 of planning permission 6.54.176.G.FUL to alter landscaping.

APPLICANT: Bishop Monkton Parish Council

REFUSED. Reason(s) for refusal:-

1 The information supplied relating to the landscaping of the multi-use games area is insufficient. In particular, a plan showing the proposed landscaping details has been omitted but is necessary to allow full consideration of the scheme. The submitted details also omit any references to planting along the southern boundary near Paddock House, where additional planting is considered to be necessary and was previously approved. The details also fail to include a programme for the maintenance of the planting. Allowing the variation of the condition as proposed would potentially detract from the appearance of the scheme and its integration with its setting, contrary to guidance in Policy Statement 7, Planning Policy Guidance Note 17, Saved Policies C2, R5 and HD20 of the Harrogate District Local Plan, Policies SG3 and SG4 of the Harrogate District Local Development Framework and the guidance contained in the Supplementary Planning Guidance ‘Landscape Character Assessment’ (2004).

CASE NUMBER: 10/05320/FUL WARD: Claro CASE OFFICER: Mr A Hough DATE VALID: 02.12.2010 GRID REF: E 438997 TARGET DATE: 27.01.2011 N 465508 DECISION DATE: 24.01.2011

48 APPLICATION NO: 6.64.77.G.FUL

LOCATION: Ashdown Park Minskip York North Yorkshire YO51 9HY

PROPOSAL: Change of use of agricultural building to form industrial units (Use Class B1 - Business) and (Use Class B8 - Storage or Distribution) to include alterations to the building.

APPLICANT: Mr G Sadler

APPROVED subject to the following conditions:-

1 The development hereby permitted shall be begun on or before 24.01.2014.

2 The development hereby permitted shall not be carried out otherwise than in strict accordance with the submitted details as modified by the other conditions of this consent.

3 Unless otherwise agreed by the Local Planning Authority, development other than that required to be carried out as part of an approved scheme of remediation must not commence until sections 1 to 4 have been complied with. If unexpected contamination is found after development has begun, development must be halted on that part of the site affected by the unexpected contamination to the extent specified by the Local Planning Authority in writing until section 4 has been complied with in relation to that contamination.

1. SITE CHARACTERISATION An investigation and risk assessment, in addition to any assessment provided with the planning application, must be completed in accordance with a scheme to assess the nature and extent of any contamination on the site, whether or not it originates on the site. The contents of the scheme are subject to the approval in writing of the Local Planning Authority. The investigation and risk assessment must be undertaken by competent persons and a written report of the findings must be produced. The written report is subject to the approval in writing of the Local Planning Authority. The report of the findings must include:

(i) a survey of the extent, scale and nature of contamination;

(ii) an assessment of the potential risks to: * human health, * property (existing or proposed) including buildings, crops, livestock, pets, woodland and service lines and pipes, * adjoining land, * groundwaters and surface waters * ecological systems * archaeological sites and ancient monuments;

49 (iii) an appraisal of remedial options, and proposal of the preferred option(s).

This must be conducted in accordance with DEFRA and the Environment Agency's 'Model Procedures for the Management of Land Contamination, CLR 11'.

2. SUBMISSION OF REMEDIATION SCHEME A detailed remediation scheme to bring the site to a condition suitable for the intended use by removing unacceptable risks to human health, buildings and other property and the natural and historical environment must be prepared, and is subject to the approval in writing of the Local Planning Authority. The scheme must include all works to be undertaken, proposed remediation objectives and remediation criteria, timetable of works and site management procedures. The scheme must ensure that the site will not qualify as contaminated land under Part2A of the Environmental Protection Act 1990 in relation to the intended use of the land after remediation.

3. IMPLEMENTATION OF APPROVED REMEDIATION SCHEME The approved remediation scheme must be carried out in accordance with its terms prior to the commencement of development other than that required to carry out remediation, unless otherwise approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The Local Planning Authority must be given two weeks written notification of commencement of the remediation scheme works.

Following completion of measures identified in the approved remediation scheme, a verification report (referred to in PPS23 as a validation report) that demonstrates the effectiveness of the remediation carried out must be produced, and is subject to the approval in writing of the Local Planning Authority.

4. REPORTING OF UNEXPECTED CONTAMINATION In the event that contamination is found at any time when carrying out the approved development that was not previously identified it must be reported in writing immediately to the Local Planning Authority. An investigation and risk assessment must be undertaken in accordance with the requirement of section 1, and where remediation is necessary a remediation scheme must be prepared in accordance with the requirements of section 2, which is subject to the approval in writing of the Local Planning Authority.

Following completion of measures identified in the approved remediation scheme a verification report must be prepared, which is subject to the approval in writing of the Local Planning Authority in accordance with section 3.

4 All floodlights and security lights, shall be installed and maintained in accordance with the " Guidance Notes for the Reduction of Light Pollution" produced by the Institution of Lighting Engineers.

All floodlighting be turned off no later than 2100 hours.

5 No activities shall be carried out on the premises, including deliveries to or

50 dispatches from the premises, outside the hours of 08:00 and 18:00 Monday to Friday and 08:00 to 13:00 Saturdays. No activities shall take place on Sundays or Bank Holidays.

6 No development shall take place until details of a sound insulation scheme designed to protect the amenity of occupants of nearby buildings from noise emitted from the application premises has been submitted and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority.

Before use of the development is commenced, a Validation Test of the sound attenuation works shall have been carried out and the results submitted to and approved by the. Such Validation Test shall

. be carried out by a competent person in accordance with an approved method statement

. demonstrate that suitable noise levels have been achieved.

If such levels have not been achieved, irrespective of the sound attenuation work already approved, a further scheme will be required incorporating the recommendations of an acoustic consultant to achieve specified noise levels. The scheme of works shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority, installed before use of the development begins, and thereafter retained. The approved scheme shall be fully implemented and completed prior to occupation of the site.

7 Samples of the materials it is intended shall be used externally in the construction of the roof and walls of the development hereby approved, shall be submitted for the written approval of the Local Planning Authority and the development shall not be started before any such approval.

8 Prior to the commencement of any other part of the development hereby permitted, the access(es) to the site shall be laid out and constructed in accordance with the following requirements:- (ib) the existing access shall be improved by providing 10 metre radius kerbs, to give a minimum carriageway width of 6 metres, and that part of the access road extending 20 metres into the site shall be constructed in accordance with Standard Detail number E7d and the Specification of the Local Highway Authority (ii) any gates, barriers or other means of enclosure shall be erected a minimum distance of 20 metres back from the carriageway of the existing highway and shall open into the site; (v) provision shall be made to prevent surface water from the site discharging onto the existing or proposed highway in accordance with the approved details

51 and/or Standard Detail number E7d and the Specification of the Local Highway Authority.

NOTE:You are advised that a separate licence will be required from the Local Highway Authority in order to allow any works in the adopted highway to be carried out. The local office of the Local Highway Authority will also be pleased to provide the detailed constructional specification referred to in this condition.

9 The means of vehicular access to or from the business park shall be from the existing access that runs between the dwellings know as Becklands and Arden Lodge and no other access shall be used except for emergency purposes unless otherwise approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority.

10 Prior to the first use of the development the approved vehicle parking, manoeuvring, turning areas indicated on the submitted drawing [Reference 1720:10a.] shall be provided, laid out, hard surfaced, drained, marked out and made available for use. Once created these areas shall be maintained clear of any obstruction and retained for their intended purpose at all times.

11 Prior to the development being brought into use, a Travel Plan shall have been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority in consultation with the Highway Authority. This shall include: (i) the appointment of a travel co-ordinator (ii) a partnership approach to influence travel behaviour (iii) measures to encourage the use of alternative modes of transport other than the private car by persons associated with the site (iv) provision of up-to-date details of public transport services (v) continual appraisal of travel patterns and measures provided through the travel plan (vi) improved safety for vulnerable road users (vii) a reduction in all vehicle trips and mileage (viii) a programme for the implementation of such measures and any proposed physical works (ix) procedures for monitoring the uptake of such modes of transport and for providing evidence of compliance.

The Travel Plan shall be implemented and the development shall thereafter be carried out and operated in accordance with the Travel Plan.

Reasons for Conditions:-

1 To ensure compliance with Sections 91-94 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. 2 To secure the satisfactory implementation of the proposal. 3 To ensure that risks from land contamination to the future users of the land and neighbouring land are minimised, together with those to controlled waters, property and ecological systems, and to ensure that the development can be carried out safely without unacceptable risks to workers, neighbours and other offsite receptors

52 in accordance with policies SG4 and EQ1 of the Harrogate District Core Strategy. 4 In the interests of residential amenity and to ensure compliance with Harrogate District Local Development Framework Core Strategy Policy SG4. 5 In the interests of residential and in order to ensure compliance with Harrogate District Local Development Framework Core Strategy Policy SG4.

6 In the interests of residential and in order to ensure compliance with Harrogate District Local Development Framework Core Strategy Policy SG4.

7 In order to ensure that the materials used conform to the amenity requirements of the locality. 8 To ensure a satisfactory means of access to the site from the public highway, in the interests of vehicle and pedestrian safety and convenience. 9 In the interests of highway safety and to ensure compliance with the provisions of Harrogate District Local Development Framework Core Strategy Policy SG4. 10 To provide for appropriate on-site vehicle parking facilities with associated access and manoeuvring areas, in the interests of highway safety and the general amenity of the development. 11 In accordance with Harrogate District Local Development Framework Core Strategy Policies SG4 and TRA1 and to establish measures to encourage more sustainable non-car modes of transport.

JUSTIFICATION FOR GRANTING CONSENT

Both National, Regional and Local Planning Policy supports the principle of the re-use and adaptation of existing rural buildings to form employment generating uses. The site is well located in relation to the classified road network and although located in a countryside location is closely related to an existing settlement. The scale of the development has been substantially reduced in relation to the earlier refused scheme and this has resulted in the parking and turning areas being restricted to within the existing yard area only. The proposed development is considered to meet the broad thrust of Planning Policy Statement: 4 (policies EC6 EC10 and EC12) and as a scheme of conversion, Regional Spatial Strategy Policy E7. Subject to the imposition of controlling conditions as recommended by the highway authority and Chief Environmental Health officer it is considered sufficient control can be exercised over the future use of the building to ensure that the development would accord with the provisions of the saved Harrogate District Local Plan Policy E8. In the absence of any material considerations to set aside the provisions of the development plan , support can be offered for the revised proposal.

CASE NUMBER: 10/05340/FUL WARD: Harlow Moor CASE OFFICER: Phil Jewkes DATE VALID: 07.12.2010 GRID REF: E 429342 TARGET DATE: 01.02.2011 N 454336 DECISION DATE: 31.01.2011

APPLICATION NO: 6.79.12108.A.FUL

LOCATION:

53 6 Harlow Oval Harrogate North Yorkshire HG2 0DS

PROPOSAL: Erection of two storey side and single storey rear extension. (Revised Scheme).

APPLICANT: Mr And Mrs Connor

APPROVED subject to the following conditions:-

1 The development hereby permitted shall be begun on or before 31.01.2014.

2 The materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the extension hereby permitted shall match those used in the existing building.

3 The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in strict accordance with the submitted plans reference C46-1-3 and C46-1-4 received by the Local Planning Authority on the 7 December 2010.

4 Notwithstanding the provisions of The Town and Country Planning General Permitted Development Order 1995 (or any order revoking and re-enacting that Order with or without modification), no windows shall be inserted at first floor in the south elevation of the two storey side extension hereby approved, without the prior written approval of the Local Planning Authority.

Reasons for Conditions:-

1 To ensure compliance with Sections 91-94 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. 2 In the interests of visual amenity. 3 In order to ensure compliance with the approved drawings. 4 To prevent any overlooking of the garden and dwelling at 4 Harlow Oval Harrogate.

JUSTIFICATION FOR GRANTING CONSENT

The proposed extensions reflect the design and appearance of the application dwelling. There is adequate separation distance between the proposed extensions and the adjacent dwellings to ensure that the proposal does not materially harm existing levels of privacy and amenity. The two storey side extension would not have any detrimental impact on the street scene. The proposal therefore accords with the provisions of the development plan.

CASE NUMBER: 10/04927/FUL WARD: Kirkby Malzeard CASE OFFICER: Mr Gerard Walsh DATE VALID: 10.12.2010 GRID REF: E 427520 TARGET DATE: 04.02.2011 N 477294 DECISION DATE: 31.01.2011

54 N 477294 DECISION DATE: 31.01.2011

APPLICATION NO: 6.12.177.A.FUL

LOCATION: Park Cottage North Stainley Ripon North Yorkshire HG4 3JA

PROPOSAL: Conversion of barn area and alterations to existing living accommodation to form detached dwelling, conversion of stables to form sun room and store and change of use of agricultural land to form domestic garden.

APPLICANT: HH Judge And Mrs Bryant

APPROVED subject to the following conditions:-

1 The development hereby permitted shall be begun on or before 31.01.2014.

2 The development hereby permitted shall not be carried out otherwise than in strict accordance with the submitted details, as amended by letter and or drawings received by the Council of the Borough of Harrogate on the 27/01/11 and as modified by the conditions of this consent.

3 Prior to works beginning the Listed Building should be recorded in its present state in line with the 'Level 2' requirements in English Heritage's 'Understanding Historic Buildings' guidance (2006). One copy of this record should be submitted to the Borough Council, and another should be submitted to the North Yorkshire Historic Environment Record (HER), which is administered by North Yorkshire County Council.

4 Prior to undertaking any structural works to the building a schedule of works shall be submitted for the written approval of the Local Planning Authority and thereafter the works shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details.

5 Prior to the replacement or repair of any roof timbers, a schedule of replacement of roof timbers and repair methods shall be submitted for the written approval of the local planning authority. Thereafter the works shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details. Any replacement timber should be of the same species as the existing principal timbers.

6 Prior to the use of any new materials in the carrying out of the development hereby approved samples of the such materials (to include roof tiles, hip and ridge tiles, stone slate, any new brick or stone, new cills and lintels) it is intended shall be used externally in the construction of the development hereby approved, shall be submitted for the written approval of the Local Planning Authority and thereafter the development shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details.

55 7 Notwithstanding the submitted details and prior to the construction of the new chimney the proposed materials and detail of construction of the chimney shall be submitted for the written approval of the local planning authority and thereafter the chimney shall be constructed in accordance with the approved details.

8 Prior to the insertion of any new or replacement windows and doors, details of said windows and doors, to include cross sections within the masonary openings (doors at a scale of 1:5 and windows at a scale of 1:2) shall be submitted for the written approval of the Local Planning Authority. Windows shall be single glazed, timber framed with putty holding the glass in place.

9 All new and replacement windows and doors shall be recessed a minimum of 175mm from the external masonry face of the wall.

10 Samples of gutters and down pipes it is intended to use in the development hereby approved shall be submitted for the written approval of the Local Planning Authority prior to their use. Thereafter the development shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details.

11 Revised details for the proposed treatment of the floor (ground floor) shall be submitted for the written approval of the local planning authority prior to the laying of the floor. Thereafter the floor shall be laid in accordance with the approved details.

12 A method statement and sample pointing shall be agreed in writing with the local planning authority prior to the rebuilding/repair of the external staircase. Thereafter the works shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details.

13 Prior to their erection/insertion, details of the positions and appearance of all flues and vents shall be submitted for the written approval of the local planning authority. Thereafter the works shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details.

14 Details of all proposed new gates, boundary fences and gravel/paving shall be submitted for the written approval of the local planning authority prior to their use. Thereafter the development shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details.

15 Details of the proposed colours for rainwater goods, doors and windows shall be submitted for the written approval of the local planning authority prior to their use. Thereafter the development shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details.

16 Works to the buildings which could affect nesting birds shall not be undertaken during the main birds breeding season (April-September inclusively) unless a survey, undertaken immediately prior to the commencement of works by a suitably qualified ecologist, demonstrates that no active nests are present, which are likely to be subject to disturbance.

17 The domestic curtilage of the dwelling house hereby approved shall not extend any further than the area of land shown edged red on the plan (Drawing No. 2033(PL)21 attached to the unilateral undertaking) submitted to the planning authority on

56 28/01/11. For the avoidance of doubt, there shall be no means of enclosure to the domestic curtilage to the front (northeast) of the dwellinghouse hereby approved.

18 Prior to their insertion, details of the rooflights hereby approved (including a section showing how the roof light is set into the roof plane) shall be submitted for the written approval of the local planning authority. Thereafter the rooflights shall be inserted in accordance with the approved details.

19 Notwithstanding the provisions of the Town and Country Planning General Permitted Development Order 1995, or any subsequent Order, the garage(s) shall not be converted into a habitable room(s) without the express written approval of the Local Planning Authority.

Reasons for Conditions:-

1 To ensure compliance with Sections 91-94 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. 2 In order to ensure that the development is carried out in accordance with the approved drawings. 3 To ensure that an accurate record of the existing building is retained to facilitate an understanding of the historic development of this important listed building in the future. 4 To ensure that the proposed works are appropriate in the interests of conserving the character of the building. 5 To ensure that the proposed works/repairs are appropriate in the interests of conserving the character of the building.

6 In order to ensure that the materials used do not harm the character and appearance of the building or the surrounding countryside. 7 In order to ensure that the materials used and form do not harm the character and appearance of the building or the surrounding countryside. 8 In the interests of visual amenity and in order to harmonise with the existing building. 9 In the interests of visual amenity and in order to harmonise with the existing building. 10 In the interests of visual amenity and in order to harmonise with the existing building. 11 The use of a concrete floor would be likely cause rising damp in the walls which would cause harm to the fabric of this listed building. 12 In the interests of visual amenity and in order to harmonise with the existing building. 13 In the interests of visual amenity and in order to harmonise with the existing building. 14 In the interests of visual amenity and in order to harmonise with the existing building. 15 In the interests of visual amenity and in order to harmonise with the existing building. 16 To avoid disturbance to nesting birds. 17 In the interests of visual amenity and to protect the rural character of the area. 18 In the interests of visual amenity and in order to harmonise with the existing building. 19 To ensure that adequate garaging space is retained to meet the needs of the dwelling house hereby approved.

INFORMATIVES

57 1. Listed Building Consent is also required in respect of this development. You are advised not to start work until such time as an appropriate Notice of Listed Building Consent has been granted and you should ensure that the development is carried out strictly in accordance with the approved plans and the terms and conditions of such a Listed Building Consent. 2. This development is subject to a Planning Obligation made under Section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. 3. All bats and their roosts are fully protected under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 (as amended by the Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000) and are further protected under Regulation 39(1) of the Conservation (Natural Habitats etc) Regulations 1994. Should any bats or evidence of bats be found prior to or during development, work must stop immediately and Natural England contacted for further advice. This is a legal requirement under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 (as amended) and applies to whoever carries out the work. All contractors on site should be made aware of this requirement and given Natural England’s contact details; Natural England, Government Team (West), Government Buildings, Otley Road, Leeds, LS16 5QT. Tel: 0300 060 4230. Further information is also available from the Natural England’s Yorkshire and Humberside Bat helpline on 0845 1300 228.

JUSTIFICATION FOR GRANTING CONSENT

The proposed conversion will bring a listed structure back into a viable sustainable use without requiring unacceptable alterations or extensions. It therefore complies with the requirements of the local plan and core strategy and with national advice. There are no other material considerations in these circumstances that warrant setting aside these requirements.

CASE NUMBER: 10/04935/LB WARD: Kirkby Malzeard CASE OFFICER: Mr Gerard Walsh DATE VALID: 10.12.2010 GRID REF: E 427520 TARGET DATE: 04.02.2011 N 477294 DECISION DATE: 31.01.2011

APPLICATION NO: 6.12.177.LB

LOCATION: Park Cottage North Stainley Ripon North Yorkshire HG4 3JA

PROPOSAL: Listed building application for conversion of barn area and alterations to living accommodation to form detached dwelling, conversion of stables to form sun room and store and change of use of agricultural land to form domestic garden.

APPLICANT: HH Judge And Mrs Bryant

APPROVED subject to the following conditions:-

58 1 The works to which this consent relates must be begun on or before 31.01.2014.

2 The development hereby permitted shall not be carried out otherwise than in strict accordance with the submitted details, as amended by letter and or drawings received by the Council of the Borough of Harrogate on the 27/01/11 and as modified by the conditions of this consent.

3 Prior to works beginning the Listed Building should be recorded in its present state in line with the 'Level 2' requirements in English Heritage's 'Understanding Historic Buildings' guidance (2006). One copy of this record should be submitted to the Borough Council, and another should be submitted to the North Yorkshire Historic Environment Record (HER), which is administered by North Yorkshire County Council.

4 Prior to undertaking any structural works to the building a schedule of works shall be submitted for the written approval of the Local Planning Authority and thereafter the works shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details.

5 Prior to the replacement or repair of any roof timbers, a schedule of replacement of roof timbers and repair methods shall be submitted for the written approval of the local planning authority. Thereafter the works shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details. Any replacement timber should be of the same species as the existing principal timbers.

6 Prior to the use of any new materials in the carrying out of the development hereby approved samples of the such materials (to include roof tiles, hip and ridge tiles, stone slate, any new brick or stone, new cills and lintels) it is intended shall be used externally in the construction of the development hereby approved, shall be submitted for the written approval of the Local Planning Authority and thereafter the development shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details.

7 Notwithstanding the submitted details and prior to the construction of the new chimney the proposed materials and detail of construction of the chimney shall be submitted for the written approval of the local planning authority and thereafter the chimney shall be constructed in accordance with the approved details.

8 Prior to the insertion of any new or replacement windows and doors, details of said windows and doors, to include cross sections within the masonary openings (doors at a scale of 1:5 and windows at a scale of 1:2) shall be submitted for the written approval of the Local Planning authority. Windows shall be single glazed, timber framed with putty holding the glass in place.

9 All new and replacement windows and doors shall be recessed a minimum of 175mm from the external masonry face of the wall.

10 Samples of gutters and down pipes it is intended to use in the development hereby approved shall be submitted for the written approval of the Local Planning Authority prior to their use. Thereafter the development shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details.

59 11 Revised details for the proposed treatment of the floor (ground floor) shall be submitted for the written approval of the local planning authority prior to the laying of the floor. Thereafter the floor shall be laid in accordance with the approved details.

12 A method statement and sample pointing shall be agreed in writing with the local planning authority prior to the rebuilding/repair of the external staircase. Thereafter the works shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details.

13 Prior to their erection/insertion, details of the positions and appearance of all flues and vents shall be submitted for the written approval of the local planning authority. Thereafter the works shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details.

14 Details of all proposed new gates, boundary fences and gravel/paving shall be submitted for the written approval of the local planning authority prior to their use. Thereafter the development shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details.

15 Details of the proposed colours for rainwater goods, doors and windows shall be submitted for the written approval of the local planning authority prior to their use. Thereafter the development shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details.

16 The domestic curtilage of the dwellinghouse herby approved shall not extend any further than the area of land shown edged red on the plan (Drawing No. 2033(PL)21 attached to the unilateral undertaking) submitted as part of the related planning application reference 10/04927/FUL on 28/01/11. For the avoidance of doubt, there shall be no means of enclosure to the domestic curtilage to the front (northeast) of the dwelling house hereby approved.

17 Prior to their insertion, details of the rooflights an roof lantern hereby approved (including a section showing how the roof light is set into the roof plane) shall be submitted for the written approval of the local planning authority. Thereafter the rooflights shall be inserted in accordance with the approved details.

18 Notwithstanding the provisions of the Town and Country Planning General Permitted Development Order 1995, or any subsequent Order, the garage(s) shall not be converted into a habitable room(s) without the express written approval of the Local Planning Authority.

Reasons for Conditions:-

1 To ensure compliance with Section 18 of the Planning (Listed Building and Conservation Area) Act 1990. 2 In order to ensure that the development is carried out in accordance with the approved drawings. 3 To ensure that an accurate record of the existing building is retained to facilitate an

60 understanding of the historic development of this important listed building in the future. 4 To ensure that the proposed works are appropriate in the interests of conserving the character of the building. 5 To ensure that the proposed works/repairs are appropriate in the interests of conserving the character of the building. 6 In order to ensure that the materials used do not harm the character and appearance of the building or the surrounding countryside. 7 In order to ensure that the materials used and form do not harm the character and appearance of the building or the surrounding countryside. 8 In the interests of visual amenity and in order to harmonise with the existing building. 9 In the interests of visual amenity and in order to harmonise with the existing building. 10 In the interests of visual amenity and in order to harmonise with the existing building. 11 The use of a concrete floor would be likely cause rising damp in the walls which would cause harm to the fabric of this listed building. 12 In the interests of visual amenity and in order to harmonise with the existing building. 13 In the interests of visual amenity and in order to harmonise with the existing building. 14 In the interests of visual amenity and in order to harmonise with the existing building. 15 In the interests of visual amenity and in order to harmonise with the existing building. 16 In the interests of visual amenity and to protect the rural character of the area. 17 In the interests of visual amenity and in order to harmonise with the existing building. 18 To ensure that adequate garaging space is retained to meet the needs of the dwelling house hereby approved.

INFORMATIVES

1. Planning permission has also been granted for these works. You are advised, if you have not already done so, to obtain sight of the Notice of Planning Permission and the approved plans and ensure that the development is carried out strictly in accordance with the approved plans and the terms and conditions of the Planning Permission. 2. The related planning permission for this development is subject to a Planning Obligation made under Section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. 3. All bats and their roosts are fully protected under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 (as amended by the Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000) and are further protected under Regulation 39(1) of the Conservation (Natural Habitats etc) Regulations 1994. Should any bats or evidence of bats be found prior to or during development, work must stop immediately and Natural England contacted for further advice. This is a legal requirement under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 (as amended) and applies to whoever carries out the work. All contractors on site should be made aware of this requirement and given Natural England’s contact details; Natural England, Government Team (West), Government Buildings, Otley Road, Leeds, LS16 5QT. Tel: 0300 060 4230. Further information is also available from the Natural England’s Yorkshire and Humberside Bat helpline on 0845 1300 228.

JUSTIFICATION FOR GRANTING CONSENT

The proposed scheme has been discussed extensively with officers of the Planning Authority and on the basis of these discussions has been amended to the satisfaction of the Planning Authority. It has been judged that the public benefit of securing a viable use

61 of the heritage asset in the interests of its long-term conservation outweighs the limited harm the proposal causes. On that basis the proposal complies with the requirements of the local plan and core strategy and with National guidance in PPS5.

CASE NUMBER: 10/05274/FUL WARD: Knaresborough Scriven Park CASE OFFICER: Mr A Moxon DATE VALID: 30.11.2010 GRID REF: E 435078 TARGET DATE: 25.01.2011 N 457975 DECISION DATE: 24.01.2011

APPLICATION NO: 6.100.493.B.FUL

LOCATION: 1 Victoria Avenue Knaresborough North Yorkshire HG5 9EU

PROPOSAL: Erection of conservatory, detached garage and 2m high boundary wall and gate.

APPLICANT: S Robertson

REFUSED. Reason(s) for refusal:-

1 The siting of the garage in front of the dwelling would have a harmful impact upon the spatial quality and visual amenity of the area. The proposal is therefore contrary to guidance in Planning Policy Statement 1, Saved Policy HD20 of the Harrogate District Local Plan, Policies SG4 and EQ2 of the Harrogate District Local Development Framework Core Strategy DPD and guidance in the Supplementary Planning Document ‘House Extensions and Garages Design Guide’ (2005). 2 The siting of the garage against the boundary with No. 1b Victoria Avenue would cause an unacceptable level of overbearing and overshadowing to the dwelling and the front garden area of No. 1b, thus harming the living conditions of the neighbouring residents. The proposal is therefore contrary to Saved Policy HD20 of the Harrogate District Local Plan, Policy SG4 of the Harrogate District Local Development Framework Core Strategy DPD and guidance in the Supplementary Planning Document 'House Extensions and Garages Design Guide' (2005). 3 The 2m high close boarded vertical timber fencing along Victoria Avenue would perpetuate a type of boundary treatment that is not common to the locality and would be harmful to the character of the streetscene. The proposal is therefore contrary to guidance in Planning Policy Statement 1, Saved Policy HD20 of the Harrogate District Local Plan, Policies SG4 and EQ2 of the Harrogate District Local Development Framework Core Strategy DPD and guidance in the Supplementary Planning Document 'House Extensions and Garages Design Guide' (2005).

4 The yew tree on the Victoria Avenue frontage is considered to make a positive contribution to the character and appearance of the streetscene. The proposed works would result in the loss of the tree as a result of root severance and compaction. Therefore, the loss of the tree would harm the character and

62 appearance of the streetscene and conflict with Saved Policy HD13 of the Harrogate District Local Plan.

CASE NUMBER: 10/05328/FUL WARD: Low Harrogate CASE OFFICER: Ms Hannah Morrall DATE VALID: 08.12.2010 GRID REF: E 429847 TARGET DATE: 02.02.2011 N 454883 DECISION DATE: 15.02.2011

APPLICATION NO: 6.79.1556.C.FUL

LOCATION: 22 St Marys Walk Harrogate North Yorkshire HG2 0LS

PROPOSAL: Erection of 1 dormer window, installation of 2 roof lights and conversion of loft to form additional living accommodation.

APPLICANT: Mrs L Campbell

REFUSED. Reason(s) for refusal:-

1 The proposed dormer window, due to position, size, appearance and materials would result in an incongruous addition to the building that would dominate the roofslope and unbalance the appearance of the pair of symmetrically designed semi-detached properties. The proposal would not preserve the character and appearance of the property, the streetscene or the surrounding Conservation Area. The proposal is therefore contrary to guidance in Planning Policy Statements 1 and 5, Saved Policies H15, HD3 and HD20 of the Harrogate District Local Plan, Policies SG4 and EQ2 of the Harrogate District Core Strategy DPD and guidance in the Harrogate Conservation Area Character Appraisal SPD and the Council's House Extensions and Garages Design Guide SPD.

CASE NUMBER: 10/04720/FUL WARD: Lower Nidderdale CASE OFFICER: Mr A Hough DATE VALID: 01.11.2010 GRID REF: E 425735 TARGET DATE: 27.12.2010 N 461147 DECISION DATE: 31.01.2011

APPLICATION NO: 6.74.56.G.FUL

63 APPLICATION NO: 6.74.56.G.FUL

LOCATION: New Inn Burnt Yates Harrogate North Yorkshire HG3 3EG

PROPOSAL: Conversion of part of pub to form dwelling (site area 0.03ha).

APPLICANT: Mr And Mrs T King

APPROVED subject to the following conditions:-

1 The development hereby permitted shall be begun on or before 31.01.2014.

2 The development hereby permitted shall not be carried out otherwise than in strict accordance with the submitted details.

3 A vehicle parking & turning area shall, at all times, be provided & maintained within the site so as to ensure that vehicles visiting the site can enter & leave the public highway in a forward gear

4 Prior to the commencement of the proposed conversion works to form a dwelling, the public bar shall be re-located to the existing restaurant area and that part of the building not forming a dwelling shall thereafter be retained as a public house as indicated on the proposed Ground floor plan dated 27 August 2010 unless otherwise approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority.

5 The new dwelling hereby approved shall not be occupied for residential purposes until the works to create the new public house bar as specified in drawing 'Proposed Ground Floor' Scale 1/50, dated 27 August 2010 and stamped as received by the Harrogate Borough Council Planning Division on 1 November 2010, have been completed and the new bar area is operational.

Reasons for Conditions:-

1 To ensure compliance with Sections 91-94 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. 2 In order to ensure compliance with the approved drawings. 3 To ensure appropriate on-site vehicle parking facilities with associated access and manoeuvring areas, in the interests of highway safety and the general amenity of the development and to ensure compliance with Harrogate District Local Development Framework Core Strategy Policy SG4. 4 In order to ensure the retention of an existing community facility and to ensure compliance with the saved Selective Alteration to the Harrogate District Local Plan Policy CFX. 5 To ensure that the scheme is in compliance with the provisions of the saved

64 Selective Alteration to The Harrogate District Local Plan Policy CFX.

INFORMATIVES

1. This planning permission grants planning permission for the change of use of only part of the building and the remainder retains its existing lawful use as a public house.

CASE NUMBER: 10/04949/FUL WARD: Lower Nidderdale CASE OFFICER: Ms Claire Barwick DATE VALID: 17.11.2010 GRID REF: E 421706 TARGET DATE: 12.01.2011 N 465858 DECISION DATE: 24.01.2011

APPLICATION NO: 6.60.21.P.FUL

LOCATION: High North Farm Fellbeck Harrogate North Yorkshire HG3 5EY

PROPOSAL: Retention of raised decking and fencing to Lilac, Willow, Maple and Cedar cottages.

APPLICANT: Mr D Beswick

REFUSED. Reason(s) for refusal:-

1 The development to be retained is considered inappropriate development at this countryside location in the Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty and will have a detrimental visual impact when viewed across the landscape from Brimham Rocks and adjacent roadway, a popular tourist route, and is contrary to PPS7, policies HD20, C1, C16 and C18, policies SG4 of the Harrogate District Local Plan, Supplementary Planning Guidance 'Re-use and adaptation of rural buildings' and the Harrogate District Landscape Character Assessment.

CASE NUMBER: 10/04868/FUL WARD: Nidd Valley CASE OFFICER: Mr Mark Danforth DATE VALID: 30.11.2010 GRID REF: E 419073 TARGET DATE: 25.01.2011 N 457806 DECISION DATE: 24.01.2011

APPLICATION NO: 6.90.121.G.FUL

LOCATION:

65 Moorcock Hall Darley Harrogate North Yorkshire HG3 2QL

PROPOSAL: Retention of workshop (Sui Generis) and farm store.

APPLICANT: Mr A Parry

APPROVED subject to the following conditions:-

1 The building shall be dark stained in a colour to be agreed with the Local planning authority within 3 months of the date of the decision.

2 The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in strict accordance with the submitted plans reference 1762.1 A received by the Local Planning Authority on the 30 November 2010.

3 In the event of the approved use of the building for Mr Parry ceasing the building shall be used for agricultural purposes only. No other activity shall be carried out without the grant of further specific planning permission from the Local Planning Authority.

Reasons for Conditions:-

1 In the interests of visual amenity. 2 In order to ensure compliance with the approved drawings. 3 In order to prevent harm to the general amenity of the area.

JUSTIFICATION FOR GRANTING CONSENT

The proposal represents a suitably scaled replacement building at the holding, the design of which reflects that of the existing buildings. The proposal will therefore have a neutral impact on the character and appearance of the area. In addition adequate separation distances exist between the application property and neighbouring houses ensuring that the proposal does not materially harm existing levels of amenity. The proposal therefore accords with the provisions of the development plan.

CASE NUMBER: 10/05290/FUL WARD: Nidd Valley CASE OFFICER: Mr Mark Danforth DATE VALID: 07.12.2010 GRID REF: E 419988 TARGET DATE: 01.02.2011 N 458286 DECISION DATE: 31.01.2011

APPLICATION NO: 6.90.365.E.FUL

66 APPLICATION NO: 6.90.365.E.FUL

LOCATION: Fairfield Farm Sheepcote Lane Darley Harrogate North Yorkshire HG3 2RN

PROPOSAL: Erection of agricultural building to include change of use for storage for contracting machinery (Sui Generis).

APPLICANT: Messrs Houseman

REFUSED. Reason(s) for refusal:-

1 The use of the building for the contracting business is considered to be inappropriate due to insufficient information being provided of the extent of that business in relationship to the agricultural activity of the holding and the resultant impact of development on the wider environment including the character and appearance of the Nidderdale Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty. In the absence of such information that would demonstrate that no harm exists to these interests of acknowledged importance the development is contrary to the objectives of Harrogate District Core Strategy Development Plan Document policies SG4 and EQ2 and national Planning Policy Statement 7 together with RSV10 of 'The Yorkshire and Humber Plan'.

CASE NUMBER: 10/05238/ADV WARD: New Park CASE OFFICER: Mrs G Pinna-Morrell DATE VALID: 30.11.2010 GRID REF: E 429703 TARGET DATE: 25.01.2011 N 456487 DECISION DATE: 24.01.2011

APPLICATION NO: 6.79.1294.T.ADV

LOCATION: Oakdale Service Station Ripon Road Harrogate North Yorkshire HG1 2BS

PROPOSAL: Display of 3 internally and externally illuminated fascia signs, 1 internally illuminated free standing sign, 4 internally illuminated hanging signs, 4 valet units and 2 freestanding signs.

APPLICANT: Co-operative Group Limited

Part APPROVED and part REFUSED as set out below:

67 PART TO BE APPROVED:

Subject to the following Conditions;

Reasons for Conditions:

PART TO BE REFUSED:

4 internally illuminated spreader panels (Sign No.108) and illuminated freestanding PID sign (no.118)

Reasons for refusal:

1 The proposed spreader panels, due to their size and method of illumination represent intrusive visual clutter and the proposed illuminated PID sign to the road frontage, as a result of its overall scale and width would result in a visually intrusive structure that would detrimentally affect the street scene and character of the area. The display of these signs is therefore contrary to saved policy HD22 of the Harrogate District Local Plan, policy EQ2 of the Harrogate District Core Strategy Development Plan Document along with government advice embodied in Planning Policy Guidance Note 19.

JUSTIFICATION FOR GRANTING PARTIAL CONSENT

The proposed signs displayed on the fascia and within the forecourt of the petrol pumps (with the exception of the Spreader Panels) are considered acceptable. The Spreader Panels and internally illuminated freestanding sign to the road frontage, are considered visually intrusive and detrimental to the character of the area. The proposal therefore in part is in accordance with the development plan and in part contrary to local planning policies.

CASE NUMBER: 10/04867/FUL WARD: Ouseburn CASE OFFICER: Mr Andrew Siddall DATE VALID: 09.12.2010 GRID REF: E 451505 TARGET DATE: 03.02.2011 N 454731 DECISION DATE: 31.01.2011

APPLICATION NO: 6.115.6.C.FUL

LOCATION:

68 Turnbridge House Moor Monkton York North Yorkshire YO26 8JZ

PROPOSAL: Erection of single storey side extension, detached triple garage and single storey workshop with solar panels on roof.

APPLICANT: Mr Chris Lavington

REFUSED. Reason(s) for refusal:-

1 The proposed extensions, due to the increase in floor space above the original building, are disproportionate to the size of the original building and represent inappropriate development in the Green Belt that would also harm the openness of the Green Belt. The proposal is therefore contrary to the requirements of national Planning Policy Guidance Note 2, Saved Policy H15 of the Harrogate District Local Plan, Policies SG3 and EQ2 of the Harrogate District Core Strategy DPD and the objectives of the Council’s adopted Supplementary Planning Document 'House Extensions and Garages Design Guide.' 2 The cumulative impact of the proposed outbuildings when considering the presence of existing development across the land holding, causes harm to the openness of the Green Belt by introducing disproportionate additions to the built development on the site. As such the development is contrary to the requirements of national Planning Policy Guidance Note 2. 3 The proposed extensions, by way of their siting, scale and design, represent excessive additions to the property that harm the character and appearance of the existing building to the detriment of visual amenity. As such, the proposal is contrary to the objectives of national Planning Policy Statement 1, Saved Policies H15 and HD20 of the Harrogate District Local Plan, Policies SG3, SG4 and EQ2 of the Harrogate District Core Strategy DPD and the objectives of the Council’s adopted Supplementary Planning Document 'House Extensions and Garages Design Guide.'

CASE NUMBER: 10/04887/FUL WARD: Ouseburn CASE OFFICER: Mr Andrew Siddall DATE VALID: 10.12.2010 GRID REF: E 451505 TARGET DATE: 04.02.2011 N 454731 DECISION DATE: 31.01.2011

APPLICATION NO: 6.115.6.D.FUL

LOCATION: Turnbridge House Moor Monkton York North Yorkshire YO26 8JZ

PROPOSAL: Erection of agricultural building and formation of access track.

69 APPLICANT: Mr Chris Lavington

REFUSED. Reason(s) for refusal:-

1 The size of the building, when considering the level of agricultural activity observed on site and the lack of agricultural machinery, is not considered to be commensurate with the size of the land holding. As such the development represents inappropriate development in the Green Belt, which would harm the openness of the Green Belt. The proposal is contrary to the requirements of national Planning Policy Guidance 2 (Green Belts) and Policy SG3 of the Harrogate District Core Strategy DPD. 2 The size, design and external appearance of the proposed building has an industrial rather than agricultural character and is out of scale with the surrounding development and the size of the land holding. As such, the development is harmful to the visual amenity of the Green Belt and the landscape character of the area, contrary to guidance in national Planning Policy Statements 1 and 7, national Planning Policy Guidance Note 2, Policies SG3, SG4 and EQ2 of the Harrogate District Core Strategy DPD, Policies C2 and HD20 of the Harrogate District Local Plan and the objectives of the adopted supplementary planning guidance 'Harrogate District Landscape Character Assessment’ (2004).

CASE NUMBER: 10/04898/LB WARD: Ouseburn CASE OFFICER: Mr Mark Danforth DATE VALID: 07.12.2010 GRID REF: E 444931 TARGET DATE: 01.02.2011 N 461749 DECISION DATE: 31.01.2011

APPLICATION NO: 6.80.125.O.LB

LOCATION: Church Hill Main Street Great Ouseburn York North Yorkshire YO26 9RQ

PROPOSAL: Listed building application for erection of 2 single storey extensions to form garden room, study and boot room, garage and workshop.

APPLICANT: Mr David Coidan

REFUSED. Reason(s) for refusal:-

1 The proposed garaging and study by virtue of their siting, scale and inappropriate design and materials would result in a detrimental impact on the aesthetic and

70 heritage value of the designated heritage assets contrary to PPS5 (Planning and the Historic Environment) together with the PPS5 Planning Practice Guide and policy ENV9 of 'The Yorkshire and Humber Plan'.

CASE NUMBER: 10/04902/FUL WARD: Ouseburn CASE OFFICER: Mr Mark Danforth DATE VALID: 07.12.2010 GRID REF: E 444931 TARGET DATE: 01.02.2011 N 461749 DECISION DATE: 31.01.2011

APPLICATION NO: 6.80.125.P.FUL

LOCATION: Church Hill Main Street Great Ouseburn York North Yorkshire YO26 9RQ

PROPOSAL: Erection of 2 single storey extensions to form garden room, study and boot room, garage and workshop (Revised Scheme).

APPLICANT: Mr David Coidan

REFUSED. Reason(s) for refusal:-

1 The proposed garaging and study by virtue of their siting, scale, inappropriate design and materials would result in an adverse effect on the character and appearance of the conservation area and the listed buildings contrary Harrogate District Core Strategy Development Plan Document policies SG4 and EQ2 and Harrogate District Local Plan Policies HD3, HD20, H15 together with Supplementary Planning Document (House Extensions and garages design guide), PPS1, PPS5 (Planning and the Historic Environment) and policy ENV9 of 'The Yorkshire and Humber Plan'.

CASE NUMBER: 10/05416/FUL WARD: Ouseburn CASE OFFICER: Mr Mark Danforth DATE VALID: 13.12.2010 GRID REF: E 444640 TARGET DATE: 07.02.2011 N 460622 DECISION DATE: 24.01.2011

APPLICATION NO: 6.88.65.A.FUL

LOCATION:

71 The Old Granary Main Street Little Ouseburn York North Yorkshire YO26 9TD

PROPOSAL: Erection of single storey rear extension.

APPLICANT: Mr B Padgett

REFUSED. Reason(s) for refusal:-

1 The proposal by virtue of the scale, siting and inappropriate design would result in an undue visual intrusion and an adverse effect on the character and appearance of the conservation area contrary Harrogate District Core Strategy Development Plan Document policies SG4 and EQ2 and Harrogate District Local Plan Policies HD3, HD20, H15 together with Supplementary Planning Document (House Extensions and garages design guide) PPS1 and PPS5 (Planning and the Historic Environment).

CASE NUMBER: 10/05257/FUL WARD: Pannal CASE OFFICER: Mr M Parkes DATE VALID: 06.12.2010 GRID REF: E 431051 TARGET DATE: 31.01.2011 N 453591 DECISION DATE: 24.01.2011

APPLICATION NO: 6.79.93.AG.FUL

LOCATION: Telecommunications Mast Manhattan Club And Snooker Centre Beech Avenue Harrogate North Yorkshire

PROPOSAL: Removal of existing flagpole mast, containing 3 no antenna, extending 5.8 m above roof with and erection of replacement flagpole mast, containing 6 no. 3G antenna, extending 6.5m above roof (variation of planning permission 6.79.93.AF.FUL with 3 antennae of different type). Siting of 3 no. Radio Remote Units to handrail on west elevation and an additional 2G antenna to 3 existing poles located north of flagpole and on northern and western elevations.

APPLICANT: Telefonica O2 Uk Ltd

APPROVED subject to the following conditions:-

1 The development hereby permitted shall be begun on or before 24.01.2014.

72 2 The development hereby permitted shall not be carried out otherwise than in strict accordance with the submitted details, drawings 100A, 201B, 301B, 400B, 410A and 500B.

3 The installation hereby approved shall be dismantled and removed from the site immediately following its cessation of use for telecommunication purposes.

Reasons for Conditions:-

1 To ensure compliance with Sections 91-94 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. 2 In the interests of proper planning and to avoid doubt. 3 To ensure that the locality is not blighted by redundant equipment.

JUSTIFICATION FOR GRANTING CONSENT

The increased bulk of the pole in comparison to the existing and additional individual antennae would not create undue harm on the locality and on that basis the siting and appearance of the proposal are considered to be appropriate and the proposal complies with the relevant policies of the Development Plan.

CASE NUMBER: 10/05271/FUL WARD: Pannal CASE OFFICER: Mrs G Pinna-Morrell DATE VALID: 29.11.2010 GRID REF: E 430871 TARGET DATE: 24.01.2011 N 453381 DECISION DATE: 24.01.2011

APPLICATION NO: 6.79.12146.FUL

LOCATION: 21 Beech Road Harrogate North Yorkshire HG2 8DZ

PROPOSAL: Erection of single storey and two storey rear extensions.

APPLICANT: Mr And Mrs C Mercer

REFUSED. Reason(s) for refusal:-

1 The proposed single storey rear extension, due to its projection along the joint boundary, would have an overbearing and enclosing impact and the high level clear glazed windows would potentially cause overlooking of the neighbours' garden in a manner that would harm the level of amenity currently afforded to the occupants of this property. The proposal is therefore contrary to saved policies HD20 and H15 of

73 the Harrogate District Core Strategy, policies SG4 and EQ2 of the Harrogate District Core Strategy Development Plan Document along with supplementary planning guidance contained within the Council's House Extensions and Design Guide (September 2005).

CASE NUMBER: 10/05275/TPO WARD: Pannal CASE OFFICER: Ms Hannah Morrall DATE VALID: 09.12.2010 GRID REF: E 430571 TARGET DATE: 03.02.2011 N 453334 DECISION DATE: 24.01.2011

APPLICATION NO: 6.79.6899.N.TPO

LOCATION: Harrogate Racquets Club Firs Road Harrogate North Yorkshire HG2 8HA

PROPOSAL: Reduction in height of 6 Birch, 5 Ash, 2 Chestnut, 1 Willow and 1 Oak to 8 metres and lateral reduction of branches and scrub by 1 metre within Tree Preservation Order No.23 1990.

APPLICANT: Harrogate Racquets Club

REFUSED. Reason(s) for refusal:-

1 The reduction of the 6 Birch, 5 Ash, 2 Chestnut, 1 Willow and 1 Oak within area A1 Tree Preservation Order 05/2008, by 8m is not acceptable. At present, the health and visual amenity value of the trees remains high. However, the proposed crown reduction of the trees would place stress on the trees. This would increase the vulnerability of the trees to disease and pathogenic attacks and could lead to their premature death. The work proposed to the trees would have a negative impact upon the health and appearance of the trees and the appearance and visual amenity of the surrounding Conservation Area. No technical detail has been submitted with the application to justify the proposed works.

INFORMATIVES

1. The clearance of the vegetation and ground base flora from the 1m wide access way adjacent to courts 3 and 4, is maintenance, and does not require permission.

CASE NUMBER: 10/05390/DVCON WARD: Ribston CASE OFFICER: Mrs K Williams DATE VALID: 10.12.2010

74 CASE OFFICER: Mrs K Williams DATE VALID: 10.12.2010 GRID REF: E 435713 TARGET DATE: 04.02.2011 N 453414 DECISION DATE: 31.01.2011

APPLICATION NO: 6.108.19.F.DVCON

LOCATION: 8 Plompton Square Plompton North Yorkshire HG5 8LZ

PROPOSAL: Deletion of condition 8 of permission 6.108.19.D.FUL to allow annexe to be used by others and removal of window and door openings.

APPLICANT: Mr K Backhouse

REFUSED. Reason(s) for refusal:-

1 The open boundaries between the residential properties results in any further domestic activity within the complex affecting all the properties within Plompton Square and thus the character of the Conservation Area. The proposal would therefore conflict with the saved Harrogate District Local Plan Policy HD3 and Core Strategy Policies SG4, EQ1 and EQ2 and the provision of National Planning Policy contained in PPS5 - Planning and the Historic Environment. 2 The creation of an independent dwelling in this isolated location would be contrary to national policy on sustainable development contained in PPS 7 - Sustainable Development in Rural Areas, and Harrogate District Core Strategy Policy SG3, SG4, EQ1 and EQ2.

CASE NUMBER: 10/04571/FUL WARD: Ripon Minster CASE OFFICER: Mrs N M Waddington DATE VALID: 25.10.2010 GRID REF: E 431196 TARGET DATE: 20.12.2010 N 471633 DECISION DATE: 24.01.2011

APPLICATION NO: 6.31.953.V.FUL

LOCATION: 30 North Street Ripon North Yorkshire HG4 1HJ

PROPOSAL: Change of use from car showroom and repairs to retail (Use Class A1 - Shops) and installation of 2 glazed screens and doors.

APPLICANT:

75 Finton Lyle Ltd

APPROVED subject to the following conditions:-

1 The development hereby permitted shall be begun on or before 24.01.2014.

2 The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with drawing number 1010-03A dated Oct 2010, received by the Local Planning Authority on 10 December 2010, the email letter dated 7 December 2010 received on 8 December 2010, and as modified by the conditions of this consent.

3 Notwithstanding the provision of any Town and Country Planning General Permitted or Special Development Order for the time being in force, the existing areas within the site used for parking spaces, turning areas and access shall be kept available for their intended purpose at all times.

4 The retail units shall be open to the public only between the hours of 9.00am to 8.00pm Monday to Friday, 9.00am to 7.00pm on Saturdays and 10.00am to 5.00pm on Sundays and Bank Holidays. No deliveries to or despatches from the premises shall take place outside the hours of 7.00am to 6.00pm Monday to Saturday. No deliveries or despatches shall take place on Sundays and Bank Holidays. No persons shall occupy the premises outside the hours of 7.00am and 11.00pm daily.

5 Any external floodlighting and security lighting shall be directed downwards at an angle below 70 degrees, and all external lights shall be turned off between the hours of 11.00pm and 7.00am.

6 Before the development hereby permitted commences, a scheme shall be approved in writing with the Local Planning Authority which specifies the provision to be made for the control of noise emanating from any internal fixed mechanical plant, for heating, cooling, extraction and ventilation on the site. The plant shall be installed and operated in accordance with the approved scheme before the development is first brought into use.

7 Unless otherwise agreed by the Local Planning Authority, development other than that required to be carried out as part of an approved scheme of remediation must not commence until sections 1 to 4 have been complied with. If unexpected contamination is found after development has begun, development must be halted on that part of the site affected by the unexpected contamination to the extent specified by the Local Planning Authority in writing until section 4 has been complied with in relation to that contamination.

1. SITE CHARACTERISATION An investigation and risk assessment, in addition to any assessment provided with the planning application, must be completed in accordance with a scheme to assess the nature and extent of any contamination on the site, whether or not it originates on the site. The contents of the scheme are subject to the approval in writing of the Local Planning Authority. The investigation and risk assessment must be undertaken by competent persons and a written report of the findings must be produced. The

76 written report is subject to the approval in writing of the Local Planning Authority. The report of the findings must include:

(i) a survey of the extent, scale and nature of contamination;

(ii) an assessment of the potential risks to: * human health, * property (existing or proposed) including buildings, crops, livestock, pets, woodland and service lines and pipes, * adjoining land, * groundwaters and surface waters * ecological systems * archaeological sites and ancient monuments;

(iii) an appraisal of remedial options, and proposal of the preferred option(s).

This must be conducted in accordance with DEFRA and the Environment Agency's 'Model Procedures for the Management of Land Contamination, CLR 11'.

2. SUBMISSION OF REMEDIATION SCHEME A detailed remediation scheme to bring the site to a condition suitable for the intended use by removing unacceptable risks to human health, buildings and other property and the natural and historical environment must be prepared, and is subject to the approval in writing of the Local Planning Authority. The scheme must include all works to be undertaken, proposed remediation objectives and remediation criteria, timetable of works and site management procedures. The scheme must ensure that the site will not qualify as contaminated land under Part2A of the Environmental Protection Act 1990 in relation to the intended use of the land after remediation.

3. IMPLEMENTATION OF APPROVED REMEDIATION SCHEME The approved remediation scheme must be carried out in accordance with its terms prior to the commencement of development other than that required to carry out remediation, unless otherwise approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The Local Planning Authority must be given two weeks written notification of commencement of the remediation scheme works.

Following completion of measures identified in the approved remediation scheme, a verification report (referred to in PPS23 as a validation report) that demonstrates the effectiveness of the remediation carried out must be produced, and is subject to the approval in writing of the Local Planning Authority.

4. REPORTING OF UNEXPECTED CONTAMINATION In the event that contamination is found at any time when carrying out the approved development that was not previously identified it must be reported in writing immediately to the Local Planning Authority. An investigation and risk assessment must be undertaken in accordance with the requirement of section 1, and where remediation is necessary a remediation scheme must be prepared in accordance with the requirements of section 2, which is subject to the approval in writing of the Local Planning Authority.

77 Following completion of measures identified in the approved remediation scheme a verification report must be prepared, which is subject to the approval in writing of the Local Planning Authority in accordance with section 3.

Reasons for Conditions:-

1 To ensure compliance with Sections 91-94 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. 2 For the avoidance of doubt and in the interests of proper planning. 3 To ensure these areas are kept available for their intended use in the interests of highway safety and the general amenity of the development. 4 In the interests of residential amenity. 5 In the interests of residential amenity. 6 In the interests of residential amenity. 7 To ensure that risks from land contamination to the future users of the land and neighbouring land are minimised, together with those to controlled waters, property and ecological systems, and to ensure that the development can be carried out safely without unacceptable risks to workers, neighbours and other offsite receptors in accordance with policies SG4 and EQ1 of the Harrogate District Core Strategy.

INFORMATIVES

1. There is a history of ground instability in the area. This sometimes arises from the presence of peat, sometimes from gypsum and sometimes a combination. You are advised to satisfy yourself that there is no such problem on this site, or that any problem can be overcome by taking appropriate measures.

2. In respect of condition 6 above any external fixed mechanical plant, for heating, cooling, extraction and ventilation on the site, or for any other purpose requires the submission of a full planning application.

JUSTIFICATION FOR GRANTING CONSENT

The proposed change of use is acceptable in terms of its sequential assessment, design, highways and environmental health considerations, impact on the streetscene and conservation area, and does not materially harm existing levels of privacy and amenity afforded to neighbours. The proposal accords with the provisions of the development plan.

CASE NUMBER: 10/05367/TPO WARD: Ripon Moorside CASE OFFICER: Mr A Moxon DATE VALID: 09.12.2010 GRID REF: E 430254 TARGET DATE: 03.02.2011 N 469937 DECISION DATE: 31.01.2011

APPLICATION NO: 6.31.2496.TPO

78 APPLICATION NO: 6.31.2496.TPO

LOCATION: 14 Hell Wath Grove Ripon North Yorkshire HG4 2JT

PROPOSAL: Crown thin by 25% and crown lift 4 trees (species unknown) within Area A1 of Tree Preservation Order No. 30 1994.

APPLICANT: Mr Peter Scanlon

Part APPROVED and part REFUSED as set out below:

PART TO BE APPROVED:

Subject to the following Conditions;

1 The development hereby permitted shall be begun on or before 2 years of the date of this permission.

2 The crown thin shall be to a maximum of 10% and the crown lift to a maximum of 2.5 metres. The work shall be carried out by a qualified arborist and in accordance with British Standard 3998 (2010) Works to Trees.

Reasons for Conditions:

1 In the interests of the trees.

2 In the interests of the health and amenity of the tree(s).

PART TO BE REFUSED:

The 25% crown thin of Tree A Silver Birch, Tree B Sorbus and Trees C Red Leafed Cherry and Maple.

Reasons for refusal:

1 The proposed 25% crown thin of the trees would be detrimental to the form, health and vitality of the trees and their contribution to the visual amenity of the area.

CASE NUMBER: 10/04709/FUL WARD: Spofforth With Lower

79 Wharfedale CASE OFFICER: Ms Hannah Morrall DATE VALID: 30.11.2010 GRID REF: E 427570 TARGET DATE: 25.01.2011 N 447433 DECISION DATE: 24.01.2011

APPLICATION NO: 6.147.234.B.FUL

LOCATION: Avon Lodge Wayside Terrace Huby Leeds North Yorkshire LS17 0HE

PROPOSAL: Erection of single storey side extension and erection of pitched roof to part of existing flat roof.

APPLICANT: Mr Gary Parr

APPROVED subject to the following conditions:-

1 The development hereby permitted shall be begun on or before 24.01.2014.

2 The development hereby permitted shall not be carried out otherwise than in strict accordance with the details shown on the following drawing:

Drawing number 12/2010/003 Revision A received on the 11th November 2010.

3 The external materials of the extension and pitched roof hereby approved shall match the existing materials of the dwelling house.

Reasons for Conditions:-

1 To ensure compliance with Sections 91-94 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. 2 In avoidance of doubt and in the interests of proper planning. 3 In the interests of visual amenity in accordance with Policies H15 and HD20 of the Harrogate District Local Plan and Policy SG4 of the Harrogate District Core Strategy DPD.

JUSTIFICATION FOR GRANTING CONSENT

The scale, design and materials would respect the host property and the character and appearance of the area. The development would not harm the amenities of adjacent residents. The proposal therefore accords with guidance in Planning Policy Statement 1, Planning Policy Guidance Note 2, Saved Policies H15 and HD20 of the Harrogate District

80 Local Plan and Policies SG4, EQ1 and EQ2 of the Harrogate District Core Strategy DPD (adopted 2009) and 'The House Extensions and Garages Design Guide' (SPD).

CASE NUMBER: 10/05243/FUL WARD: Stray CASE OFFICER: Mr Graham Brookfield DATE VALID: 08.12.2010 GRID REF: E 430382 TARGET DATE: 02.02.2011 N 454370 DECISION DATE: 31.01.2011

APPLICATION NO: 6.79.5358.F.FUL

LOCATION: Morningside 10 Leeds Road Harrogate North Yorkshire HG2 8AA

PROPOSAL: Conversion of 1 dwelling to form 4 flats with installation of 2 windows and 2 rooflights (Site Area 0.05ha).

APPLICANT: Mr Malcolm Bowker

APPROVED subject to the following conditions:-

1 The development hereby permitted shall be begun on or before 31.01.2014.

2 The proposed new windows to the gable elevation shall be sliding sash and no other type of window shall be used.

3 The laundrette, bin storage area and cycle store shown on the approved plans shall be provided prior to first occupation of the new dwellings and retained for their intended use for the life of the development.

4 The proposed roof-lights shall be a Conservation roof-light and finish flush with the plane of the roof.

5 The proposed accommodation shall not be sold or rented privately on the general market without further formal planning consent being granted by the Local Planning Authority.

6 Notwithstanding the provision of any Town and Country Planning General Permitted or Special Development Order for the time being in force, the areas shown on 3040/01/02A for parking spaces, turning areas and access shall be kept available for their intended purposes at all times.

7 The window on the rear elevation of the property, to the new 1st floor kitchen, shall be obscurely glazed to level 3 on the Pilkington Scale of Privacy and retained as such for the life of the development.

81 8 The existing hedge to the front boundary of the property shall be retained at a minimum height of 1.8m and if any of the hedging plants die they should be replaced with hedging plants of the same species within the next planting period.

9 The development hereby permitted shall not be carried out otherwise than in strict accordance with the submitted details, as amended by letter and or drawings received by the Council of the Borough of Harrogate on the 27/1/2011 and as modified by the conditions of this consent.

Reasons for Conditions:-

1 To ensure compliance with Sections 91-94 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. 2 In the interests of the visual amenities of the property and surrounding area. 3 In the interests of the residential amenities of the occupiers and to promote sustainable transport options. 4 In the interests of the character of the property and wider Conservation Area. 5 To ensure that the accommodation remains as supported accommodation and to ensure compliance with Policy CFX of the Harrogate Local Plan. 6 In accordance with Policy SG4 of the Harrogate Core Strategy and to ensure these areas are kept available for their intended use in the interests of highway safety and the general amenity of the development. 7 To protect the residential amenities of the neighbouring property. 8 To protect the existing character of the street scene and to ensure the car parking is screened from public view. 9 In order to ensure that the development is carried out in accordance with the approved drawings.

JUSTIFICATION FOR GRANTING CONSENT

In principle redevelopment of the site to provide additional dwelling is considered to be acceptable and complies with the requirements of Policy CFX of the Local Plan. The proposal will not be harmful to the amenities of surrounding properties or have a detrimental impact on the existing character of the property, street scene or Conservation Area. The existing access will be used and adequate off-street parking has been indicated on the plans. The proposal is not considered to be harmful to highway safety. The proposal therefore complies with the requirements of the Development Plan and there are no material considerations that warrant setting aside Development Plan Policies.

CASE NUMBER: 10/05004/FUL WARD: Washburn CASE OFFICER: Mr Gerard Walsh DATE VALID: 01.12.2010 GRID REF: E 428308 TARGET DATE: 26.01.2011 N 451272 DECISION DATE: 24.01.2011

APPLICATION NO: 6.134.121.F.FUL

82 LOCATION: Fairview Farm Brackenthwaite Lane Pannal Harrogate North Yorkshire HG3 1PL

PROPOSAL: Conversion and extension of agricultural building to form 1 dwelling and detached triple garage with office over (site area 0.26ha) (revised scheme).

APPLICANT: Mr P Turner

REFUSED. Reason(s) for refusal:-

1 The proposed development would, by reason of the excessive amount of inappropriate extensions and new build and inappropriate fenestration cause significant harm to the character and appearance of both the existing barns and the surrounding countryside and to the openness of the Green belt. It is therefore contrary to saved policies C2, C9 and C16 of the Harrogate District Local Plan, policies SG4 and EQ2 of the Core Strategy, guidance in the Harrogate District Landscape Character Assessment and to Government advice in PPG2 and PPS7.

CASE NUMBER: 10/05375/FUL WARD: Washburn CASE OFFICER: Mr A Moxon DATE VALID: 09.12.2010 GRID REF: E 419161 TARGET DATE: 03.02.2011 N 455291 DECISION DATE: 31.01.2011

APPLICATION NO: 6.106.50.F.FUL

LOCATION: Land Comprising Field At 419161 455291 Cobby Syke Road Fewston North Yorkshire

PROPOSAL: Erection of detached triple garage.

APPLICANT: Mr G Heptonstall

REFUSED. Reason(s) for refusal:-

1 The proposed building due to its position, size, design and appearance would be out of keeping with the permitted dwelling and would harm the open landscape of this part of the Nidderdale Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty. The proposal is therefore contrary to guidance in Planning Policy Statements 1, 5 and 7, Policies LCR1 and

83 ENV10 of the Regional Spatial Strategy, Saved Policies C1, C2, H15 and HD20 of the Harrogate District Local Plan, Policies SG3, SG4 and EQ2 of the Harrogate District Core Strategy DPD and the guidance contained in the Council's Supplementary Planning Document 'House Extensions and Garages Design Guide' (2005) and Supplementary Planning Guidance 'Landscape Character Assessment' (2004).

2 The dwelling on the site has been permitted exceptionally as a farmworkers dwelling that is commensurate with the functional requirement of the associated agricultural enterprise. However, it has not been demonstrated that the proposed building would be justified in relation to the functional requirement of the associated agricultural enterprise in this rural location. Permitting the development in the absence of an adequate justification could also lead to pressure to remove the agricultural occupancy restriction on the dwelling. The proposal is therefore contrary to guidance in Annex A of Planning Policy Statement 7, Saved Policy H15 of the Harrogate District Local Plan and guidance in the Council's Supplementary Planning Document 'House Extensions and Garages Design Guide' (2005).

CASE NUMBER: 10/04858/FUL WARD: Wathvale CASE OFFICER: Mr A Moxon DATE VALID: 30.11.2010 GRID REF: E 438287 TARGET DATE: 25.01.2011 N 473154 DECISION DATE: 24.01.2011

APPLICATION NO: 6.26.138.A.FUL

LOCATION: School House Chapel Yard Dishforth Thirsk North Yorkshire YO7 3JX

PROPOSAL: Erection of two storey extension, replacement porch, garden office and detached garage with living accommodation over.

APPLICANT: Mr And Mrs Gill

REFUSED. Reason(s) for refusal:-

1 The two-storey rear extension, by virtue of its siting, scale, design and form would harm the character and appearance of the host building and would not respect the significance of the heritage asset or local distinctiveness. The proposal is therefore contrary to guidance in Planning Policy Statements 1 and 5, Saved Policies H15 and HD20 of the Harrogate District Local Plan, Policies SG4 and EQ2 of the Harrogate District Core Strategy DPD and the guidance contained in the Council’s

84 Supplementary Planning Document 'House Extensions and Garages Design Guide' (2005). 2 The front porch, by reason of its siting, scale, design and form would be out of keeping with the character and appearance of the host property and would not respect the significance of the heritage asset or local distinctiveness. The proposal is therefore contrary to guidance in Planning Policy Statements 1 and 5, Saved Policies H15 and HD20 of the Harrogate District Local Plan, Policies SG4 and EQ2 of the Harrogate District Core Strategy DPD and the guidance contained in the Council's Supplementary Planning Document 'House Extensions and Garages Design Guide' (2005).

3 The garage and annex, by reason of its siting, scale, design, form and relationship to the host building would harm the setting of School House and would not respect local distinctiveness. The proposal is therefore contrary to guidance in Planning Policy Statements 1 and 5, Saved Policy HD20 of the Harrogate District Local Plan, Policies SG4 and EQ2 of the Harrogate District Core Strategy DPD and the guidance contained in the Council’s Supplementary Planning Document 'House Extensions and Garages Design Guide' (2005).

CASE NUMBER: 10/05294/FUL WARD: Woodfield CASE OFFICER: Mr Graham Brookfield DATE VALID: 06.12.2010 GRID REF: E 430980 TARGET DATE: 31.01.2011 N 456927 DECISION DATE: 31.01.2011

APPLICATION NO: 6.79.12153.FUL

LOCATION: 17 Butler Road Harrogate North Yorkshire HG1 4PF

PROPOSAL: Conversion of dwelling to form 2 flats and installation of 1 door and 1 replacement window (Site Area 0.02ha).

APPLICANT: Accent Foundation

APPROVED subject to the following conditions:-

1 The development hereby permitted shall be begun on or before 31.01.2014.

2 The proposed new brick-work to infill the existing window and door, as shown on the approved plans, shall match the existing brickwork in respect of the type of brick, its colour and coursing.

85 3 The bin store and cycle racks shown on the approved plans shall be provided prior to first occupation of the new dwellings and retained for their intended use for the life of the development.

4 No development shall take place until either - i. Full details of public open space to serve the development in accordance with Policy C1 of the Harrogate District Core Strategy have been submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority and agreement has been reached with the Local Planning Authority as to the provision of the same and its subsequent management and maintenance. ii. Alternative arrangement for the provision of open space have been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority.

Reasons for Conditions:-

1 To ensure compliance with Sections 91-94 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. 2 In the interests of the visual amenities of the property and surrounding area. 3 In the interests of the residential amenities of the occupiers and to promote sustainable transport options. 4 In order to secure compliance with Policy C1 of the Harrogate District Core Strategy in relation to the provision of open space for residential development.

INFORMATIVES

1. With respect to condition 4: this requirement can be met through the mechanism of a Unilateral Section 106 Agreement agreeing to pay a commuted sum in lieu of provision of Public Open Space.

JUSTIFICATION FOR GRANTING CONSENT

In principle redevelopment of the site to provide an additional dwelling is considered to be acceptable. The creation of two smaller units instead of the existing single unit is not considered to be harmful to the amenities of surrounding properties or have a detrimental impact on the existing character of the property or street scene. The existing access will be used and adequate off-street parking has been indicated on the plans. The proposal is not considered to be harmful to highway safety. The proposal therefore complies with the requirements of the Development Plan and there are no material considerations that warrant setting aside Development Plan Policies.

86 HARROGATE BOROUGH COUNCIL

PLANNING COMMITTEE

LIST OF APPLICATIONS DETERMINED BY THE HEAD OF PLANNING SERVICES AFTER CONSULTATION WITH THE CABINET MEMBER (PLANNING)

CASE NUMBER: 10/05497/SCREEN WARD: Falls Within 2 Or More CASE OFFICER: Mr Andrew Siddall DATE VALID: 16.12.2010 GRID REF: E 419187 TARGET DATE: 06.01.2011 N 464297 DECISION DATE: 20.01.2011

APPLICATION NO:

LOCATION: Glen House Wilsill Harrogate North Yorkshire HG3 4DJ

PROPOSAL: Environmental Impact Assessment Screening Opinion for hydropower plant.

APPLICANT: Northern Millwrights

Environmental Impact Assessment Is Not Required

1 Having regard to the criteria in Schedule 3 of the Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations, it is considered that the development would not have significant effects on the environment within the context of the regulations by virtue of factors such as its nature, size or location. Accordingly, the Local Planning Authority considers that the proposal is not EIA development.

Reasons for Conditions:-

CASE NUMBER: 10/05576/SCREEN WARD: Pateley Bridge CASE OFFICER: Mr Andrew Siddall DATE VALID: 24.12.2010 GRID REF: E 410065 TARGET DATE: 14.01.2011 N 475919 DECISION DATE: 20.01.2011

APPLICATION NO:

87 LOCATION: Limley Farm New Houses Harrogate North Yorkshire HG3 5SN

PROPOSAL: Environmental Impact Assessment Screening Opinion for hydropower plant.

APPLICANT: Northern Millwrights

Environmental Impact Assessment Is Not Required

1 Having regard to the criteria in Schedule 3 of the Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations, it is considered that the development would not have significant effects on the environment within the context of the regulations by virtue of factors such as its nature, size or location. Accordingly, the Local Planning Authority considers that the proposal is not EIA development.

Reasons for Conditions:-

CASE NUMBER: 10/05578/SCREEN WARD: Pateley Bridge CASE OFFICER: Mr Andrew Siddall DATE VALID: 24.12.2010 GRID REF: E 410097 TARGET DATE: 14.01.2011 N 476630 DECISION DATE: 20.01.2011

APPLICATION NO:

LOCATION: Barn At Grid Reference 410097 476630 New Houses North Yorkshire

PROPOSAL: Environmental Impact Assessment Screening Opinion for hydropower plant.

APPLICANT: Northern Millwrights

Environmental Impact Assessment Is Not Required

1 Having regard to the criteria in Schedule 3 of the Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations, it is considered that the development would not have significant effects on the environment within the context of the regulations by virtue of factors such as its nature, size or location. Accordingly, the Local Planning Authority considers that

88 the proposal is not EIA development.

Reasons for Conditions:-

89