DOCUMENT RESUME

ED 076 897 CG 007 285 AUTHOR Pedrini, D. T.; Pedrini r Eonnie C. TITLE Projection: A Bibliography. PUB DATE 72 NOTE 12p.

EDKS PPICE MF-S0.65 HC-$3.29 DESCRIPTORS *Behavior Patterns; *Bibliographies; *Projective Tests; *Psychological Patterns; ^Psychology ABSTRACT Sigmund Freud and his associates did much clinical work with the dynamic of projection, especially with regard to paranoid symptoms and syndromes. Much experimental work has also been done with projection. Sears evaluated the results of some of those studies. Murstein and Pryer sub-classified projection and reviewed typical studies. The bibliography lists research with projection between the late 1920's and the middle 1960's. There are many uses of the word "projection". As a Freudian dynamic or mechanism, however, it is in the unconscious ego and related to unpleasure, threat, or anxiety. Many of the studies presented in this bibliography attempt to deal with projection as a Freudian conceptualization. (Author) PROJECTION:. A BIBLIOGRAPHY

cr D.T. Pedrini and Bonnic 0. Pedr:lr:i oc University of Nebraska at Omaha, Cmaha, Nebraska 68lO],

Abstract Sigmund Freud and his associates did much clinical work with the dynamic of projection, expccially with regard to paranoid symptoms and syndromes. Much

experimental work has also been done with projection. Sears evaluated the results

of some of those studies. Murstein and Pryer cub-classified pi ejection and reviewed typical studies. Cur bibliogi^aphy lists research with projection betv;een the Ia1el920's and the middle 1960*3. There are many uses of the word "projection."

As a Freudian dynamic or mechanism, however, it is in the unconscious ego and related to unpleasure, threat, or anxiety. Many of the studies presented in this bibliography attempt to deal with projection as a Freudian conceptualization.

30 rsJ o o

FILMED FROM BEST AVAILABLE COPY PROJECTION

Akutagawa, D. A study in construct validity of the psycho-analytic concept

of latent anxiety and a test of a projection distance hypothesis.

Dissert. Abstr., 1956, 16>, 2519.

Alker, H. A. Cognitive controls and the Haan-Kroeber model of ego functioning.

J. abnorm. Psychol.. 196?, 22, 4;j4-440,

Apfeldorf, M., & Smith W. J. The representation of the body self in human

figure drawings. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1962, 64, 283-288.

Bellak, L. The concept of projection: An experimental investigation and

study of the concept. Psychiatry. 1944, £» 353-370.

Benedek, T. Defense mechanisms and ego structure. Int. Zaoh. f. Psychoanal...

1937, 23, 490-508.

Benedek, T. Defense mechanisms and structure of the total personality. Psycho-

anal. Quart.. 1957, 6., 96-118.

Bernabeu, E. P. Underlying ego mechanisms in delinquency. Psychoanal. Quart., 1958, 27., 383-396. Bibring, E. Clinical contributions to the paranoia question: II. A case of organ projection. Int. Zsch. f. Psychoanal., 1929, 12, 44-66. Bieri, J., Blacharsky, E., & Reid, J. W. Predictive behavior and personal ad­ justment. J. consult. Psychol.. 1955, 19. 351-355. Bindleglas, P. M. Therapeutic approaches to projection. Psychiat. Quart., 1965, 22. 293-302. BlumbergjS., & Maher, B. Trait attribution as a study of Freudian Projection.

j. soc. Psychol.. 1965, 65, 311-316. P/ramel, D. A dicr.-vnr.nce theory approac:i to defensive projection. J .. ,?bn; -r^. __r-^i

Bra;r.e.l, D. Selection :if a target for defensive pro u >n. J. ahn^nn. s-"c.

Psych-1., 1963, 6f, 318-32*1.

Butler, R. L. Responses of institutionalized mentally retarded cliildren to human and to animal pictures. Amer. t J.. inont. Defjc., 1961, _63_, 620-622.

Cattell, R. B. Projection and the design of protective tests of personality. Charact. Pers.. 19-Vl , 12, 177-19 J »

Cattell, R. B., & Wenig, P. ~J. Dynamic and cognitive factors controlling rnis­ perception. J. abn^r:^. sac. Psycho!., 1952, ji7, 797-809.

Chance, J. E., & Headers, V. Needs and interpersonal perception. J. Pers. , I960 ,

28, 200-209.

Chansky, II. M. How students see their teacher. Mont. Hy^. ,17. Y^, 195^ > fr.2 ,

118-120. / Chris toffel, H. Observations on the tv/o mechanisms of identification: In agree­

ment with G. H. Graber. Imago, Lpz., 1937, 2^, '19-62.

Clanon, T. L. Persecutory feeling and self-mutilation in prisoners. Correct. Psychiat._.J. spc... Ther. , 1965, 11, 96-102. Clark, R. A., & Sensibar, M. R. The relationship between symbolic and manifest projections of sexuality with some incidental correlations. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol.. 1955, 5°, 327-33^. Cohen,A.R. Experimental effects of ego-defense on interpersonal relations. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1956, 32. 19-27. Cohen,R. A. Anxiety. Med. Ann., D. C. t 1950, 1£, ^79-484, 541-542. Collier, K. G. The role of projection in genesis of the superego. Brit. J. med. Psychol.. 19^4, 20, 96-99. Colombo, E. R., & Moccio, P. The vampire: Study of a rumor. Acta neuropsiquiat.

Argent.. 1961, 1, 12-19. Cowden, R. C. Empathy or projection. J. clin. P.:,ohol., 1955, 11, 188-190.

Dana, R. H. Eisegesis and assessment. J. proj. Tech. pera- Assess., 19^6,

J50, 216-222.

Davitz, J. R. Fear, anxiety, and the perception of others. J. gen. Psycho!., 1959, 61, 169-173. de Saussure, R. The mechanisms of projection in the neuroses. Ann. mecU^ psychol., 1929, 8? (11), 118-126. Dolto-Marette, P. Psychoanalytic therapy with the aid of the "flower doll."

Prax. Kinderpsychol. Kinderpsychiat. t 1958, £» 40-50.

Edlow, D. W., & Kiesler, C. A. Ease of denial and defensive projection, £. exp. soc. Psychol., 1966, j2 (1), 56-69. Peigenbaum, D. On projection. Psychoanal. Quart., 1936, J5, 303-319. Peshbach, S., & Feshbach, N. Influence of the stimulus object upon the complementary and supplementary projection of fear. J. abnorci. soc. Psychol.. 1963, 66, 498-502. Feshbach, S., & Singer, R. D. The effects of fear arousal and suppression of fear upon social perception. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol.. 1957, £5» 28^-?3v, Peshbach, S., & Singer, R. D. Effects of anger arousal and similarity upon the attribution of hostility to pictorial sti-mili. J. consult. Psychol., 1963, 27_, 248-252. Plescher, J. Contribution to a bioanalytical study on projection and intro­ jection. Int. J. Psycho-Anal.. 1949, ^0, 203-204. Flescher, J. Contribution to a psychoanalytical study on projection and introjection. Psychoanal. Rev., 1951, ^8, 353-360. Poltim, E. M. Paintings of psychotic patients. Amer. Psychologist.. 19^6, j.., 445. Priedman, I. Phenomenal, ideal, and projected conceptions of self. J. abnorm. Psychol.. 1955, *1, 6ll-6l4. Freul, A. The ego an:: the roc]ui:vl_.?;ur> of c'.c fence. London: Hogarth and The

Institute of Psycho-Analysis, 1937-

Gluck, I-T. R. The relationship betv.-ecn ho utility in the TAT and bahavir-irJ.

hostility. J. rro.i. Tech.. 1955, 22, 21-26.

Gluck, H. R. Rorschach content and hostile behavior. J. con~i.lt. Prychcl., 1955, 12. ; i75-'!73.

Goldingr;, : :. J. Cn the avowel and projection of happiness. J. Pern., 195^, 23, 30-37.

Goldstein, S. A projective study of psychoanalytic rnechariinmr, of defense. Dinrert. Abrtr.,1952, JL2, 2lS.

Green, R. T., & Stacey, B. G. A survey of the idealized self images of voters as measured by a projective technique. Brit. J. soc. clin. Psychol., 19^7, j5, 108-118.

Haan, N. Proposed moiel of ego functioning, Psychol. I-.'onocr., 1963, 77. No. 8. Haan, N. Coping and defense mechanisms related to personality inventories. J. consult. Psychol., 1965, 2", 373-378.

Hall, C. S. Diagnosing personality by the analysis of dreams. J. abnorm. aoc. Psychol., 19^7, jte, 68-79.

Harnik, J. Introjection and projection: In the mechanism of depression. Int. J. Psycho-Anal.. 19^2, 1^, 425-4J2.

Hastorf, A. H., & Bender, I. E. A caution respecting the measurement of eiapathic ability. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol.. 1952, 47_, 574-5?6. Hochheimer, Vi. Concerning projection. Psyche, Heidel., 1955» 2.t 279~305« Hoffman, E. P. Projection and ego development. Int. Zsch. f. Psychoanal., 1935> 21, 3^2-373.

Hornberger, R. H. The projective effects of fear and sexual arousal on the rating of pictures., J. clin. Psychol., 1960, 16, Kuntley, G. V'. Jud -"meats of scOf based upon records of expres." Lv j behavior. J .

KI 1 v-• . **r- ' xop,*s* '-' _)i;->I £- v (

Ichhc.-ir.cr, G, Projccrti-'-n and the inate-beaT:-r.:'.--c::anin:-:. J^. -xbii-ir:::. rrc . Fryc': !_._, 19-7, iil, 133-133.

Johnson, J. ii. E::;p:it':iy, projection, and job perfor;r..^^r:Li cf plant pupcrvi sors .

Dinport. Abr.tr., 195", !£ ^53-

ILauf:r.-n, M. II. Projection, heterosexual and homosexual. ?s v/cl;"::;ril . yjart. ,

193", 1, 13^-136.

Kaufnun, M. ii. A clinical note 011 social anxiety. P.^ychtvinal. Rev. , 19^9, 28, -" 7^-77­

Kiesler, C. A., & Singer, R. D. The effects of similarity and guilt on the pro­ jection of hostility. J. cljn. Psyche;!., 1963, 19, 157-162. Kroeber, T. C. Tlie coping functions of the ego mechanisms. In White, R. W. (Ed.), The study of lives. New York: Atherton, 1963. Lorenz, M. Problems posed by schizophrenic languace. Arch, gen. Psychlat. , 19^1 Jj., 603-610. Lundin, W. Psychodynardc differences between undetermined and paranoid types of schizophrenia elicited by the projective-movement-sequence test. A. M. A. Arch. Neurol. Psychiat.^ 1952, 68, 4(M. Lundy, R. M. Assimilative projection and accuracy of prediction in interpersonal perceptions. J. abnorm. soc. Psycho!., 1956, 52, 33~38« Lundy, R. M.,& Eerko^tz, L. Cognitive complexity and assimilative projection in attitude change . J . abnorm . soc . Psycho! . , 1957 » 55 » 3^-37 Malin, A., & Grotstein, J. S. Projective identification in the therapeutic process. Int. J. Psycho-Anal.. 1966, 4?, 26-31. Margoshes, A., & Litt, S. Projective imagery in Shakespeare. J. proj. Tech.

pers. Aogess.. 1966, ^0(3), 290-292. McClelland, D. C., Atkinson, J. W., & Clark, R. A. The projective expression

of needs: III. The effect of ego-involvement, success, failure on perception. J. Psycho!.. 19^9, ?7t 311-530

Meltzer, D. Relation of anal masturbation to projective identification. Int. J. Psycho-Anal.. 1966, 47_, 335-3^2.

Miller, D. R., & Swanson, G. E. jCnner .conflict _and defense. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, I960.

Mintz, E. E. Personal problems and diagnostic errors of clinical psychol­ ogists. J. proj. Tech.. 1957, 21, 123-128. Mondy, L. W. A failure to obtain defensive projection. Psycho1. Rep.. 1967, 20, 1009-1010.

Mvihl, A. M. Identification-projection-domination. Mpd. Worn. J..19^3,^0,219-228. Murray, H. A. The effect of fear upon estimates of the maliciousness of other personalities. J. soo. Psychol.. 1933, Ji» 310-329.

Murstein, B, I. The projection of hostility on the Rorschach as a result of ego threat. J. pro.1. Tech.. 1956, 20, 4l8-428.

Murstein, B. I. Studies in projection: A critique. J. proj. Tech.. 1957, 21, 129-136.

Murstein, B. I. The effect of amount of possession of the trait of hostility on accuracy of perception of hostility in others. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1961, 62, 216-220.

Murstein B. I., & Fryer, R. S. The concept of projection: A review. Psychol. Bull., 1959, 5£, 353-37*.

Newstrand, M. B. The eavesdropping questions: A new projective technique to aid in determining self-image. J. pro.1. Tech.. 1958, 22. 312-319. Norman, R. D., & Ainsworth, P. The relationship among projection, empathy, reality, and adjustment, operationally defined. J. consult. Psychol.. 1954, 18. 53-58. Kojv.-iii, R. D., oc Lciding, W. C. The relationship betv;ecu nieasurcs of individual a. id iiir-.;-'3 o::ipathy . J. c

O'Kelly, L. I., & Stock] e, L. C. A note on jLcr.c-endurins emotional :>-r;>-:n:;ibi"l Ity in the rat. J. Pr-chcl., l',AO, £, 125-131.

Onbredane, A. Distinction and positioning of the aspects of projecti'.-n. Bull.

Gr. Etud. Pr.ychol., Univ. Parir, 1952, _4, 55-62.

Peak, II., Muney, 3.,&Clay, M. Opposite structures, defenses, and attitudes, Psychol. Mono -jr., I960, 7^, Ho. 8.

ReisiTian, J. LI. Types of movement in children's Korschachs. J. proj. Tech. , I960, 2fj., 46-48.

Hichter, H. E c Object-relationship in schizophrenia. Nervenarzt, 19^8, 29,

Roberts, G. The effect of stimulus variation on projection of children. Dinsert. Abstr. . 3958, 12, 365-366.

Kukeuch, W. ot-uciieo in .neauoy: xx. i>ome ae-oerrainers or tne percepxion of beauty

in women. J. soc. Psychol., 1945, 22, 155-169.

Rosenthal, R. The experimental induction of the defense mechanism of projection.

J. proj. Tech... 1959, 2J, 357-363.

Sarkar, J. K.. Introjection and projection. Indian J. Psychol., 1929, _4_, 135-146.

Saul, L. J. Some observations on a form of projection. Psychoanal . Cjuart . , 1947, 16, 472-481.

Sears, R. R. An experimental study of the Freudian dynamic "projection." Psychol . Bull.. 1934, jjl, 711.

Sears, R. R. Experimental studies of projection: I. Attribution of traits. J.

soc. Psychol.. 1936, ]_, 151-163. Sears, R. R. Experimental studies of projection: II. Ideas of reference. J. soc. Psycho 1.. 1937, %, 389-400. 9

Seam, H. R. Survey ^f ' bjective r-turSicr; ;;f jcyoiv^n^lytie ccricoj-.tr. Nev: York:

ooci-'il Science Heneareh Council, Hi: 1. ].. Mo. 'jl , IQ'O-

Seal's, 11. R. .Experiment:!! analysis fif psychoanalytic pher.roion.i. In Hunt, J.

McY. (Ed.), Personality ar.-.l the Behavior dir;or.1nrs. Vol. I. New Yc.rV;:

Ronald, 19^.

Shen-;ood, J. J. Sclf-respsct and projective measures of achievement and affil­

iation. J. consult. Pr.ychol., 1966, ^0, 329-537.

Silver;:i-in, P. L. Some personality correlates of attributive projection. PereejTb.

mot. Skills. 1962, 11(3), 9^7-955.

Singer, R. D. A cognitive view of rationalised projection. J. i)roj. Tech. pcrr.,

Assess.. 1963, 27_(2). 235-2^.

Singer, R. D., & Peshbach, S. Effects of anxiety arousal in psychotics and normals

upon the perception of anxiety in others. J. Pcrs., 1962. jjJO, 57^-52?.

Smith, A. J. Perceived similarity and the projection of similarity: The influence

of valence. J. abnom. soc. Psycho!., 1958, _5_7_, 376-^79.

Spivak, A. P. Leveling-aharpening as related to repression and projection.

Dissert. Abstr., 1965, 2^, 6771.

Stephen, K. Introjection and projection: Guilt and ra&e. Brit. J. med. Psycho!., I93'i, li, 316-331. Stotland, E., Zander, A., & Natsoulas, T. Generalization of interpersonal similarity. J. abnorm. soc. Psyohol., 196l, 25, 216-220. Suessmilch, P. L. A long-terratnaladjustnent culminating in catatonic episodes during adolescence. J. proj. Tech., 1956, 20, 4l8-428. Swanson, G. E. Determinants of the individual's defenses against inner conflict: Review and refemulation. In Gridewell, J. C. (Ed.), Parental attitudes in child behavior. Springfield, 111: Charles C. Thomas, 1961. ' " DO

f Thomas, II. F. The relationship cf movement responses on the Kor:ic:.;.ch tent t-:­

the defense mechanism cf projection. J . .-.hmn.!. :•.'__ -c . rr>yc:iol . , 1953> _!>\ 41-44.

Thomsen, A. Psychological projection and tlie election: / simple class exper­ iment. J. Psych-. 1.. 19'!1, ]_!, 115-137.

Tolentino, I. Psychodynamic considerations vdth respect to projection in a case of sensitive delusions of reference treated by psychotherapy. A^ch. Fsncnl . Neurol. Psichiat., 1957, 18, ^>356.

Tiiddentiai i , R. D., & McBride, P. D. The yielding experiment from the subject's point of view. J. Pers., 1959, 2J_, 259-270.

Vroom, V. H. Projection, negation, and the self-concept. Hum. Relat. , 1959» 12,

V/allon, E. J., & Uebb, \I. B. The effect of varying decrees of projection on test scores, J. consult. Psyc'nol., 1957, 23 , '465-^72. warsnaw, L,. , & iiailey, M. Person perception in relationship to personality pro­ jection. J. proj. Tech., 196l, 25, 216-220.

Veatherley, D. A. An investigation of the relationship between anti-Semitism and

displacement, projection, and inhibit:' on of aggression. Dissert. Abstr., 1957, 17_, teO.

V«'einstock, A. R. Longitudinal study of social class and defense preferences. J. consult. Psychol.. 1967, _21, 539-541. Weinstock, A. R. Family environment and the development of defensive and coping mechanisms. J. pers. soc. Psychol., 19&7, .5., 67-75* Weiss, E. Regression and projection in the superego. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 1932,

Weiss,' E. Projection, extrajection, and objectivation. Psychoanal . Quart . , 1947, 16, 357-377. 11

Wells, W. D., & Goldstein, }{. L. Soars' study of projection: Replications ;-.nd

critique. J. 3r-c. Psycno-1 ., 196-'i, 64, 169-] 79.

Werthei:ncr, M. The defense mechanisms that studcnLs report in their own behavior.

J. f^net. Psychol., 3958, c£, 111-112.

Wenterman, II. A. J. Projection and identification. Ned. Ti.jcU ; chr. Pr;ycurlv.

Grencreb., 1950, 5., 79-99­

Uexrner, L. D. /ui experirr.ental -'nvestic^tion uf projection as a functi/;n of psycho­

logical distance between subjects and picture. Di_nsert._ Abatr., 195'5, jji' 582.

Winick, C. Hov; people perceived "The Mad Bomber." Publ.. 0:- :[: . Quart., ]96l, 23, 25-38.

Wispe, L. G. The success attitude: An analysis of the relationship betv:een in­

dividual needs and social role-expectancies. J. soc. Psycho!., 1957 > j i-6, 119-123.

Wright, B. A. Altruism in children and the perceived conduct of others. J. abnorra. soc. Psychol., 1942, 37, 218-233.

I/right, B. A. An experimentally created conflict expressed by means of a pro­ jective technique. J. soc. Psychol., 19^5, 21, 229-245.

Wright, G. 0. Projection and displacement: A cross cultural study of folk-tale aggression. J. abnonn. soc. Psycho].., 1954, 49, 523-528.

Zimmer, II. The roles of conflict and internalized demands in projection. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1955, ^2» 188-192.