DOCSLIB.ORG

Pre-Submission Consultations Statement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pre-Submission Consultations Statement PLANNING AND COMPULSORY PURCHASE ACT 2004 THE TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING (LOCAL PLANNING) (ENGLAND) REGULATIONS 2012 DRAFT CUMBRIA MINERALS AND WASTE LOCAL PLAN REGULATIONS 17 and 19 PRE-SUBMISSION CONSULTATIONS STATEMENT This report describes the Regulation 18 consultations in 2012 about the content of the Minerals and Waste Local Plan. It summarises the main issues that were raised and where they have been addressed in the draft Local Plan. February 2013 Cumbria MWLP Pre-submission Consultations Statement – February 2013 CONTENTS 1. The Regulation 18 consultations 2. Summary of the main issues raised and how the Local Plan takes them into account APPENDICES 1. Consultation letter 2. List of consultees 2 Cumbria MWLP Pre-submission Consultations Statement – February 2013 1 Regulation 18 consultations about the content of the Local Plan 1.1 Regulation 18 consultation letters, inviting comments about what the Local Plan should contain, were sent out to over 600 consultees by post and by email, on 25 June 2012, with a consultation period until 8 August 2012. A copy of the consultation letter is in Appendix 1 and lists of consultees are in Appendix 2. 2. Summary of the main issues raised by the representations that were received and where they are addressed in the Local Plan. 2.1 Substantive responses to the Regulation 18 consultations were received from forty three organisations or individuals. In addition, discussions have been held with three companies about mineral working proposals and these have been included as representations. Seventy three comments about specific issues can be identified. 2.2 There were also thirteen responses to the consultations that made no comments, agreed with the suggested content of the Local Plan or just provided updated contact details. 2.3 The response rate to the consultations was disappointingly low; this perhaps reflects difficulties in commenting on what a plan should contain, rather than on the actual content of a draft plan. It is hoped that there will be a better response to the first draft of the plan. 2.4 The comments related to a wide range of matters. Some of these can be covered in the text of the Local Plan, others are directly relevant to its policies. The substantive comments can be considered under seven headings:- Minerals Radioactive wastes Other wastes Environmental policies Community benefits Water resources/flooding References to other policies 2.5 At the present time, it appears that the main areas where there is likely to be continuing disagreement, are in connection with lower activity radioactive wastes (Policies SP6 and 7 and SAP5); non-inert landfill capacity (Policies SP3 and 4 and SAP4); “windfall” sites for waste management facilities (paragraph 19.3) and, possibly, aggregate minerals, although further work on these will be required to prepare the annual Local Aggregates Assessments (Policies SP8 and 9 and SAP6). 2.6 In the following paragraphs, the text in italics identifies where the comments that were received have been addressed in the draft Local Plan. 3 Cumbria MWLP Pre-submission Consultations Statement – February 2013 Minerals 2.7 Taking account of the comments, it appeared that reviews of existing policies or the inclusion of additional policies needed to be considered for:- the new requirement for a Local Aggregates Assessment; This is referred to in Local Plan paragraphs 5.40 to 5.44 and in Policy SP9. the new Duty to Co-operate; Considerable efforts have been devoted to this; in particular, the authorities in the north west have set up an informal North West Waste Network to replace the previous Regional Technical Advisory Body; an Aggregates Working Party has continued on an informal basis pending the resolution by DCLG of resourcing issues; meetings have been held with all of the Cumbria districts and with authorities in the north east, Yorkshire and Humberside; and the Council is actively engaged with the Local Government Association Nuclear Legacy Advisory Forum (NuLeAF) about radioactive waste matters and with Nuclear Decommissioning Authority national group meetings. Areas of Search and/or Preferred Areas for particular quarries; The most relevant paragraphs are 5.36 to 5.39 and 5.45 to 5.71 and Policies SP9 and SAP6. proposals for underground coal mining and for safeguarding coal resources; The relevant paragraphs are 5.28 to 5.32 and Policy DC10. local building and roofing stone quarries; Paragraph 5.25, Appendix 2 and Policies SP9 and SP12 are relevant. industrial limestones; Paragraph 5.27 and Policy SP11 are relevant. the potential for mineral site restoration schemes to contribute to biodiversity and flood relief; Paragraph 9.2 and Policy SP18 are relevant. Mineral Safeguarding Areas for slate and for peat; Paragraph 20.32 and Policies SP9 and SAP7 are relevant for slate. Paragraph 5.26 is relevant to peat. In accordance with National Planning Policy Framework paragraph 143, no provision is made for peat extraction. Radioactive wastes 2.8 The matters that appeared to require consideration of reviewed or new policies include:- whether or not all types of radioactive waste and all aspects of their management should be covered in the Local Plan; Chapter 4 and Policies SP 5, 6 and 7 and SAP5 are relevant. should there be local policies relating to a potential deep geological repository for higher activity wastes or is this a matter for national policies; The County Council has decided not to continue to participate in the process of finding a site for such a repository and no policies for the disposal of higher activity radioactive wastes are included. references to Committee for Radioactive Waste Management reports; Paragraph 4.5 refers to CoRWM, see also comment above. that geological screening for a repository should precede “volunteerism”; 4 Cumbria MWLP Pre-submission Consultations Statement – February 2013 This is a comment about the Government’s approach in Managing Radioactive Waste Safely and is not a matter that the Local Plan could have addressed. that there is good evidence that West Cumbria’s geology is unsuitable; There is no consensus about this; it would have been one of the priorities if there had been continued participation in the process of trying to identify suitable locations. community engagement, security and governance issues; Policy SP5 is relevant in connection with storage of wastes and SP6 in connection with a community fund. lessons from Fukushima; Policy SP5 refers to international standards and best practice, but the lessons from Fukushima are predominantly matters for national policy and the other regulators and could not be addressed in the Local Plan. disposal of millions of tonnes of spoil from the construction of a repository; This is not a relevant Local Plan issue now that the County Council is no longer participating in the process of finding potential sites for a repository. issues about facilities for managing lower activity radioactive wastes, from Cumbria and beyond; Paragraphs 4.18 to 4.35 and Policies SP6 and SP7 and SAP5 are relevant. impacts on the image of Cumbria as a national leisure area; Paragraph 4.35 and Policies SP 2, 5, 6, 7, 15 and 17 are relevant. Other wastes 2.10 Policy considerations include:- need to review amounts of waste arisings and consequent capacities of facilities that are needed; The most relevant paragraphs are 3.17 to 3.60 and Policy SP3. provision of recycling facilities; Paragraphs 3.10, 3.12, 3.33 to 3.35, 3.47 and Policies SP3 and SAP6 are relevant. location of waste management facilities, including centralised ones; Paragraphs 3.61 and Policy SP3 are relevant. avoidance of “windfall” sites; The most relevant paragraph is 19.3. Reference is also made to paragraphs 3.63 and 15.2 and Policy DC7. requests to identify particular landfills; Paragraphs 3.15, 3.47 to 3.60, 20.10 to 20.12, Appendix 1 and Policies SP4, 6 and 7 and SAP4 and 5 are relevant. co-location with renewable energy facilities; Paragraphs 3.36, 3.40, 3.64, 3.65 and Table 3.1, 20.5 to 20.9 and Policies SP3 and SAP2 and 3 are relevant. planning application consultations; These have to be in accordance with the Development Management Procedure Order and the Statement of Community Involvement. Duty to Co-operate; Please see earlier comments under minerals. 5 Cumbria MWLP Pre-submission Consultations Statement – February 2013 Environmental Policies 2.11 Policy considerations include:- Chapter 8 of the draft Local Plan relates to most of these points, including those about particular environmental assets; reference is made to Boxes 8.1 and 8.2 and Policy SP17. Other specific paragraph and policy references are given below. protecting and conserving regionally important geological sites; protection and enhancement of the historic environment; green infrastructure and restoration schemes in relation to climate change, flood storage and biodiversity enhancement; Chapter 6 and Policy SP14 relate to climate change; Chapter 8 and Policy SP17 are relevant to green infrastructure and biodiversity enhancement; Chapter 9 and Policies SP18 and DC13 are relevant to restoration schemes. sustainability principles; The most relevant paragraphs are 2.25 to 2.29 and Policy SP1. RSS policies and evidence base; Local Plan paragraphs 8.11 to 8.13 and 8.20 are the most relevant. ancient woodlands; Nature Improvement Area objectives; The Morecambe Bay Limestones and Wetlands NIA is within Cumbria and is listed in Box 8.1 in connection with policy SP17. It is the only NIA in the north of England. site location criteria re brownfield land; Table 3.1: site location criteria, includes brownfield land as part of a sequential approach. reference to purposes of adjacent National Parks designation; This is a matter of national policy and paragraphs 115 and 116 of the NPPF are relevant.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • At the Meeting of Bothel & Threapland Parish Council Held at Bothel
    BOTHEL AND THREAPLAND PARISH COUNCIL Minutes of the meeting of Bothel & Threapland Parish Council held at the Village Hall, Bothel on Tuesday 13th September, 2016 commencing at 7.30 p.m. Present: G. Bowe M. Story R. Teasdale N. Todhunter (Chair) R. Watson Also Present: A. Bowness, Cumbria County Council (for part of the meeting) J. Mounsey, Allerdale Borough Council One member of the public J. Rae (Clerk) 37. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE Apologies for absence were received from Cllrs. S. Austin, K. Nelson and PCSO A. Ostle. 38. MINUTES OF THE MEETING 12 JULY 2016 RESOLVED that the minutes of the Meeting held on 12th July, 2016 were agreed as a true record and signed by the Chairman. 39. CHAIRMAN’S ANNOUNCEMENTS Dog Fouling - A report had been received that dog fouling is occurring on the grassed area at the top of the village near Hunting Lodge Close. This has to be regularly removed so the grass can be cut. It was suggested that additional signs be sited in this area reminding people to respect the area and clean up after their dogs. Closure of Maryport and Wigton Hospitals - Public meetings have been held recently about the future of Maryport and Wigton Hospitals. Anyone wishing to voice their concerns should email Sir Neil Mckay on [email protected] or contact the MP for the area Sue Hayman. Dementia Action Alliance – An invitation had been received from Age UK who have formed an informal Dementia Action Alliance Group. The next meeting will be held on Monday 3rd October at Aspatria Surgery.
    [Show full text]
  • William Maxwell
    Descendants of William Maxwell Generation 1 1. WILLIAM1 MAXWELL was born in 1754 in England. He died in Apr 1824 in Sebergham, Cumberland, England. He married Letitia "Letty" Emmerson, daughter of John Emmerson and Mary Simson, on Aug 29, 1785 in Sebergham, Cumberland, England. She was born in 1766 in Sebergham, Cumberland, England. She died on Apr 16, 1848 in Hawksdale, Cumberland, England1. William Maxwell was buried on Apr 19, 1824 in Sebergham, Cumberland, England. William Maxwell and Letitia "Letty" Emmerson had the following children: 2. i. SARAH2 MAXWELL was born in 1800 in Sebergham, Cumberland, England (Parkhead). She died on Jul 08, 1844 in Penrith, Cumberland, England (Cockrey2). She met (1) JOHN PEEL. He was born in 1777 in Greenrigg, Cumberland, England (Caldbeck). He died on Nov 13, 1854 in Ruthwaite, Ireby High, Cumberland, England3-4. She married (2) THOMAS NOBLE on May 22, 1834 in Penrith, Cumberland, England (St. Andrew's Church). He was born about 1795. He died in Oct 1836 in Penrith, Cumberland, England. She married (3) JOHN COPLEY in 1840 in Penrith, Cumberland, England. He was born about 1790 in Buriton, Westmorland, England. He died in 1873 in Penrith, Cumberland, England. 3. ii. MARY MAXWELL was born in 1785 in Sebergham, Cumberland, England (Hartrigg). She married WILLIAM RUTHERFORD. iii. ROBERT MAXWELL was born in 1787 in Dacre, Cumberland, England. iv. JOHN MAXWELL was born in 1788 in Sebergham, Cumberland, England (Hartrigg). v. WILLIAM MAXWELL was born in 1791 in Sebergham, Cumberland, England (Small lands). He died in 1872 in Sebergham, Cumberland, England. He married Hannah Bulman, daughter of Chris Bulman and Ann Foster, on Feb 10, 1842 in Sebergham, Cumberland, England.
    [Show full text]
  • New Planning Applications Within the Lake District National Park Week Ending: 23 October 2010
    New Planning Applications within the Lake District National Park Week Ending: 23 October 2010 7/2010/5359 District: South Lakeland Application type: Full Applicant Name: Mr B Coulthwaite Location: Tween Bridges, Ings, Kendal, LA8 9PY Development: Demolition of dwelling house and construction of two storey building for brewery and 8 no letting bedroom for the Watermill Inn together with the construction of a vehicular bridge and a pedestrian bridge Parish: Staveley with Ings TIC: Date valid: 20-Oct-2010 Case Officer: Ben Long Grid Ref: 344557 498667 T/2010/0080 District: South Lakeland Application type: TPO application Applicant Name: Mr A Todd, Lake District National Park Authority Location: Brown Howe, Coniston, Cumbria Development: Heavily reduce 1 branch on oak tree (W4) and coppice one hazel (W3) Parish: Blawith and TIC: Date valid: 18-Oct-2010 Subberthwaite Case Officer: Marina Ramsden Grid Ref: 329047 491117 T/2010/0085 District: Copeland Application type: TPO application Applicant Name: Mr Brian Kelloway, Berkeley Leisure Group Ltd Location: Fell View Park, Gosforth, Seascale, Cumbria, CA20 1HY Development: G2 - remove overhanging branches and deadwood on trees 9, 11, 12, 14, 15 and 16 Parish: Gosforth TIC: Date valid: 20-Oct-2010 Case Officer: Marina Ramsden Grid Ref: 307189 503304 New Planning Applications within the Lake District National Park Week Ending: 23 October 2010 7/2010/5536 District: South Lakeland Application type: Full Applicant Name: Macdonald Hotels & Resorts Location: Dunmail Cottage, Grasmere, Ambleside, LA22
    [Show full text]
  • Community Governance Review – Egremont
    COMMUNITY GOVERNANCE REVIEW – EGREMONT EXECUTIVE MEMBER Councillor David Moore LEAD OFFICER Julie Betteridge, Director of Customer and Community Services REPORT AUTHOR Tim Capper, Community Governance Projects Officer Why has this report come to the Panel? To obtain agreement to proposals for the first stage of the Community Governance Review of Egremont Parish, and to the Review Terms of Reference, Initial Proposals and arrangements for consultation. Recommendation – that the Electoral Review Working Party: (a) Agrees the Terms of Reference for the Egremont Review as shown in Appendix “A”; (b) Agrees the Initial Proposals document shown in Appendix “B”; (c) Agrees the consultation proposals and the consultation period as set out at para 4; and (d) Agrees to invite Egremont Town Council to participate in the consultation as set out in para 4. 1 Introduction 1.1 Council on 28 June agreed to undertake Community Governance Reviews of four parishes in the Borough, under the provisions of the Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Act 2007 (the 2007 Act). 1.2 Council also noted that the conduct of the reviews agreed on 28 June fall within the terms of reference of this working party, and agreed that ward members for each parish to be reviewed be co-opted onto the working party for that parish review. Councillors Hogg, McVeigh and Pollen will therefore be co-opted for the Egremont review. 1.3 This report sets out proposals for the initial stages of the review of Egremont parish, which it is envisaged will be completed by the end of the current calendar year.
    [Show full text]
  • New Additions to CASCAT from Carlisle Archives
    Cumbria Archive Service CATALOGUE: new additions August 2021 Carlisle Archive Centre The list below comprises additions to CASCAT from Carlisle Archives from 1 January - 31 July 2021. Ref_No Title Description Date BRA British Records Association Nicholas Whitfield of Alston Moor, yeoman to Ranald Whitfield the son and heir of John Conveyance of messuage and Whitfield of Standerholm, Alston BRA/1/2/1 tenement at Clargill, Alston 7 Feb 1579 Moor, gent. Consideration £21 for Moor a messuage and tenement at Clargill currently in the holding of Thomas Archer Thomas Archer of Alston Moor, yeoman to Nicholas Whitfield of Clargill, Alston Moor, consideration £36 13s 4d for a 20 June BRA/1/2/2 Conveyance of a lease messuage and tenement at 1580 Clargill, rent 10s, which Thomas Archer lately had of the grant of Cuthbert Baynbrigg by a deed dated 22 May 1556 Ranold Whitfield son and heir of John Whitfield of Ranaldholme, Cumberland to William Moore of Heshewell, Northumberland, yeoman. Recites obligation Conveyance of messuage and between John Whitfield and one 16 June BRA/1/2/3 tenement at Clargill, customary William Whitfield of the City of 1587 rent 10s Durham, draper unto the said William Moore dated 13 Feb 1579 for his messuage and tenement, yearly rent 10s at Clargill late in the occupation of Nicholas Whitfield Thomas Moore of Clargill, Alston Moor, yeoman to Thomas Stevenson and John Stevenson of Corby Gates, yeoman. Recites Feb 1578 Nicholas Whitfield of Alston Conveyance of messuage and BRA/1/2/4 Moor, yeoman bargained and sold 1 Jun 1616 tenement at Clargill to Raynold Whitfield son of John Whitfield of Randelholme, gent.
    [Show full text]
  • North West Inshore and Offshore Marine Plan Areas
    Seascape Character Assessment for the North West Inshore and Offshore marine plan areas MMO 1134: Seascape Character Assessment for the North West Inshore and Offshore marine plan areas September 2018 Report prepared by: Land Use Consultants (LUC) Project funded by: European Maritime Fisheries Fund (ENG1595) and the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Version Author Note 0.1 Sally First draft desk-based report completed May 2015 Marshall Paul Macrae 1.0 Paul Macrae Updated draft final report following stakeholder consultation, August 2018 1.1 Chris MMO Comments Graham, David Hutchinson 2.0 Paul Macrae Final report, September 2018 2.1 Chris Independent QA Sweeting © Marine Management Organisation 2018 You may use and re-use the information featured on this website (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. Visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government- licence/ to view the licence or write to: Information Policy Team The National Archives Kew London TW9 4DU Email: [email protected] Information about this publication and further copies are available from: Marine Management Organisation Lancaster House Hampshire Court Newcastle upon Tyne NE4 7YH Tel: 0300 123 1032 Email: [email protected] Website: www.gov.uk/mmo Disclaimer This report contributes to the Marine Management Organisation (MMO) evidence base which is a resource developed through a large range of research activity and methods carried out by both MMO and external experts. The opinions expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect the views of MMO nor are they intended to indicate how MMO will act on a given set of facts or signify any preference for one research activity or method over another.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Strategy
    FUTURE GENERATION Contents West Cumbria 2 Foreword 3 1 Introduction 4 1.1 What is a Sustainable Community? 4 1.2 What is a Strategy for Sustainable Communities? 6 1.3 Who is this Strategy for? 7 2 Vision 8 3 Our Overarching Aims 9 4 A Sense of Place 10 4.1 West Cumbria - the Place 10 4.2 West Cumbria - Prosperity 11 4.3 West Cumbria - People 12 5 Localities 14 5.1 Cleator Moor 15 5.2 Cockermouth 15 5.3 Egremont 16 5.4 Keswick 16 5.5 Maryport 17 5.6 Mid Copeland 17 5.7 Millom 18 5.8 North Allerdale (Aspatria, Silloth and Wigton) 18 5.9 Whitehaven 19 5.10 Workington 20 6 Seizing the Opportunities - Transformational Strategies 21 6.1 Advantage through Knowledge - Managing Transition 22 6.2 Lifestyle Choice 24 6.3 Coastal Renaissance 26 6.4 Making Better Connections 28 6.5 Communities that Work 30 6.6 Networks and Leadership 32 6.7 Quality Public Services 34 6.8 Respect for Rights and Responsibilities 36 7 Implementing the Strategy 38 8 Monitoring, Evaluating and Reporting back to Our Communities 39 Appendix 1: Glossary 41 Appendix 2: Monitoring 48 Appendix 3: Process of Creating the Strategy 50 Appendix 4: Evidence 53 Appendix 5: List of Useful Reference Documents 55 1 FUTURE GENERATION West Cumbria West Cumbria stretches from the Duddon Estuary in the south to the Solway Firth in the north, from the Irish Sea in the west into the Lake District in the east. It has over 70 miles of coastline and covers an area of over 800 square miles, half of which lies within the Lake District National Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Jubilee Digest Briefing Note for Cartmel and Furness
    Furness Peninsula Department of History, Lancaster University Victoria County History: Cumbria Project ‘Jubilee Digests’ Briefing Note for Furness Peninsula In celebration of the Diamond Jubilee in 2012, the Queen has decided to re-dedicate the VCH. To mark this occasion, we aim to have produced a set of historical data for every community in Cumbria by the end of 2012. These summaries, which we are calling ‘Jubilee Digests’, will be posted on the Cumbria County History Trust’s website where they will form an important resource as a quick reference guide for all interested in the county’s history. We hope that all VCH volunteers will wish to get involved and to contribute to this. What we need volunteers to do is gather a set of historical facts for each of the places for which separate VCH articles will eventually be written: that’s around 315 parishes/townships in Cumberland and Westmorland, a further 30 in Furness and Cartmel, together with three more for Sedbergh, Garsdale and Dent. The data included in the digests, which will be essential to writing future VCH parish/township articles, will be gathered from a limited set of specified sources. In this way, the Digests will build on the substantial progress volunteers have already made during 2011 in gathering specific information about institutions in parishes and townships throughout Cumberland and Westmorland. As with all VCH work, high standards of accuracy and systematic research are vital. Each ‘Jubilee Digest’ will contain the following and will cover a community’s history from the earliest times to the present day: Name of place: status (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • The Seaside Resorts of Westmorland and Lancashire North of the Sands in the Nineteenth Century
    THE SEASIDE RESORTS OF WESTMORLAND AND LANCASHIRE NORTH OF THE SANDS IN THE NINETEENTH CENTURY BY ALAN HARRIS, M.A., PH.D. READ 19 APRIL 1962 HIS paper is concerned with the development of a group of Tseaside resorts situated along the northern and north-eastern sides of Morecambe Bay. Grange-over-Sands, with a population in 1961 of 3,117, is the largest member of the group. The others are villages, whose relatively small resident population is augmented by visitors during the summer months. Although several of these villages have grown considerably in recent years, none has yet attained a population of more than approxi­ mately 1,600. Walney Island is, of course, exceptional. Since the suburbs of Barrow invaded the island, its population has risen to almost 10,000. Though small, the resorts have an interesting history. All were affected, though not to the same extent, by the construction of railways after 1846, and in all of them the legacy of the nineteenth century is still very much in evidence. There are, however, some visible remains and much documentary evidence of an older phase of resort development, which preceded by several decades the construction of the local railways. This earlier phase was important in a number of ways. It initiated changes in what were then small communities of farmers, wood-workers and fishermen, and by the early years of the nineteenth century old cottages and farmsteads were already being modified to cater for the needs of summer visitors. During the early phase of development a handful of old villages and hamlets became known to a select few.
    [Show full text]
  • Der Europäischen Gemeinschaften Nr
    26 . 3 . 84 Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften Nr . L 82 / 67 RICHTLINIE DES RATES vom 28 . Februar 1984 betreffend das Gemeinschaftsverzeichnis der benachteiligten landwirtschaftlichen Gebiete im Sinne der Richtlinie 75 /268 / EWG ( Vereinigtes Königreich ) ( 84 / 169 / EWG ) DER RAT DER EUROPAISCHEN GEMEINSCHAFTEN — Folgende Indexzahlen über schwach ertragsfähige Böden gemäß Artikel 3 Absatz 4 Buchstabe a ) der Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG wurden bei der Bestimmung gestützt auf den Vertrag zur Gründung der Euro­ jeder der betreffenden Zonen zugrunde gelegt : über päischen Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft , 70 % liegender Anteil des Grünlandes an der landwirt­ schaftlichen Nutzfläche , Besatzdichte unter 1 Groß­ vieheinheit ( GVE ) je Hektar Futterfläche und nicht über gestützt auf die Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG des Rates vom 65 % des nationalen Durchschnitts liegende Pachten . 28 . April 1975 über die Landwirtschaft in Berggebieten und in bestimmten benachteiligten Gebieten ( J ), zuletzt geändert durch die Richtlinie 82 / 786 / EWG ( 2 ), insbe­ Die deutlich hinter dem Durchschnitt zurückbleibenden sondere auf Artikel 2 Absatz 2 , Wirtschaftsergebnisse der Betriebe im Sinne von Arti­ kel 3 Absatz 4 Buchstabe b ) der Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG wurden durch die Tatsache belegt , daß das auf Vorschlag der Kommission , Arbeitseinkommen 80 % des nationalen Durchschnitts nicht übersteigt . nach Stellungnahme des Europäischen Parlaments ( 3 ), Zur Feststellung der in Artikel 3 Absatz 4 Buchstabe c ) der Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG genannten geringen Bevöl­ in Erwägung nachstehender Gründe : kerungsdichte wurde die Tatsache zugrunde gelegt, daß die Bevölkerungsdichte unter Ausschluß der Bevölke­ In der Richtlinie 75 / 276 / EWG ( 4 ) werden die Gebiete rung von Städten und Industriegebieten nicht über 55 Einwohner je qkm liegt ; die entsprechenden Durch­ des Vereinigten Königreichs bezeichnet , die in dem schnittszahlen für das Vereinigte Königreich und die Gemeinschaftsverzeichnis der benachteiligten Gebiete Gemeinschaft liegen bei 229 beziehungsweise 163 .
    [Show full text]
  • How Should We Plan for Our District's Future?
    Local Plan Consulatation 2015 Plan Consulatation Local People, Homes & Jobs How should we plan for our district’s future? Developing a Local Plan for Lancaster District 2011–2031 Public consultation: Monday 19 October to 30 November 2015 People, Homes and Jobs – How can we meet our future development needs? To support the needs of a growing and changing community The overall strategy to meet these needs and provide opportunities for economic growth, Lancaster City Council must prepare a local plan. A lot of development is to continue with an urban-focussed activity is already happening locally. However, there is a approach to development that is great potential to create more jobs and successful businesses through continued growth at Lancaster University, investment supplemented with additional new large in the energy sector and opportunities created by completion strategic development sites that can be of the Heysham to M6 link road. developed for housing and employment. The latest evidence on the potential for new jobs and the housing needed to provide for a growing community suggests In 2014, the council consulted on five options for new a need to plan for around 9,500 jobs and 13,000-14,000 new strategic development sites. Following the consideration of homes for the years up to 2031. these options the council is proposing a hybrid approach with The evidence also suggests that the economic sustainability a number of additional strategic sites as the district’s needs of this area could become vulnerable due to falling numbers cannot be met by one single option. This approach has been in the working age population as older workers retire and they developed based on your views from the consultation last are not being replaced by enough new workers.
    [Show full text]
  • Arnside and Silverdale Milnthorpe Hollins 3 Deer Well Park Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty Dallam Tower Sandside Quarry Kent Channel 2 Sandside
    Arnside and Silverdale Milnthorpe Hollins 3 Deer Well Park Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty Dallam Tower Sandside Quarry Kent Channel 2 Sandside Beetham Storth Fiery House Underlaid Teddy Wood Heights Beetham Fairy Steps Hall 7 Farm Hazelslack Tower Carr Bank Slackhead Beetham Fell Beetham Park Wood Edge 1 Arnside Moss 110m Ashmeadow Coastguard Lookout Arnside Major Marble Leighton Beck Woods Quarry Hale Fell Beachwood New Dobshall Barns Grubbins Wood Red Bay Wood Hills Leighton Wood Coldwell Furnace Parrock Bridge Hale Moss Blackstone Copridding Silverdale Moss Point Wood Arnside Knott 11 Nature Reserve 159m Brackenthwaite White Creek Gait Barrows National Nature Reserve Heathwaite Arnside Arnside Tower Point Little Hawes White Moss Water Thrang End Hawes Water Middlebarrow Yealand Plain Eaves Hawes Water Storrs Far Arnside Wood Moss Jubilee Mon 6 10 Pepperpot Trowbarrow 12 8 Local Nature Reserve Round Yealand Silverdale To p Redmayne The Cove Bank House Hogg Bank Well Leighton Moss Farm Wood RSPB Cringlebarrow Wood Bottoms Burton Well 5 Wood Deepdale Pond The Lots The Green Leighton Moss RSPB Know Hill Fleagarth Woodwell Know End Wood Point Summerhouse Hill 4 Heald Brow Gibraltar 9 Tower Yealand Jack Scout Crag Foot Conyers Chimney Hyning Scout Jenny Brown’s Wood Jenny Brown’s Cottages Point Barrow Scout Three RSPB Brothers Shore Hides RSPB Strickland Wood Potts Wood N Bride’s Chair Warton Crag 125m Warton Crag Disclaimer: The representation on this map of Local Nature Reserve any other road, track or path is no evidence of Morecambe Bay a right of way. Map accuracy reflects current by Absolute. 2k by the Arnside and Silverdale April 2007.
    [Show full text]