DOCSLIB.ORG

Hydrogeological Risk Assessment Proposal to Restore

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hydrogeological Risk Assessment Proposal to Restore Environmental Statement Volume 3 – Hydrogeological Risk Assessment Proposal to Restore Rugeley ‘B’ Station Borrow Pit through Landfill using Pulverised Fuel Ash Rugeley Power Station May 2007 Document control sheet Form IP180/B Client: Rugeley Power Limited Project: Rugeley B Station Borrow Pit Landfill Job No: J24151C0 Title: Environmental Statement (Volume 3, Hydrogeological Risk Assessment) Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by ORIGINAL NAME NAME NAME S. Mannings & A. J. Oakeshott Parkes S. Mannings DATE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE April 2007 REVISION 1 NAME NAME NAME J. Oakeshott S. Mannings S. Mannings DATE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE May 2007 REVISION NAME NAME NAME DATE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE REVISION NAME NAME NAME DATE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE This report, and information or advice which it contains, is provided by Jacobs Ltd solely for internal use and reliance by its Client in performance of Jacobs Ltd’s duties and liabilities under its contract with the Client. Any advice, opinions, or recommendations within this report should be read and relied upon only in the context of the report as a whole. The advice and opinions in this report are based upon the information made available to Jacobs Ltd at the date of this report and on current UK standards, codes, technology and construction practices as at the date of this report. Following final delivery of this report to the Client, Jacobs Ltd will have no further obligations or duty to advise the Client on any matters, including development affecting the information or advice provided in this report. This report has been prepared by Jacobs Ltd in their professional capacity as Consulting Engineers. The contents of the report do not, in any way, purport to include any manner of legal advice or opinion. This report is prepared in accordance with the terms and conditions of Jacobs Ltd‘s contract with the Client. Regard should be had to those terms and conditions when considering and/or placing any reliance on this report. Should the Client wish to release this report to a Third Party for that party's reliance, Jacobs Ltd may, at its discretion, agree to such release provided that: (a) Jacobs Ltd's written agreement is obtained prior to such release, and (b) By release of the report to the Third Party, that Third Party does not acquire any rights, contractual or otherwise, whatsoever against Jacobs Ltd, and Jacobs Ltd accordingly assume no duties, liabilities or obligations to that Third Party, and (c) Jacobs Ltd accepts no responsibility for any loss or damage incurred by the Client or for any conflict of Jacobs Ltd's interests arising out of the Client's release of this report to the Third Party. Contents 1 Introduction 1-1 2 Installation Description 2-1 2.1 Site Location 2-1 2.2 Historical Development and Existing Arrangement 2-1 2.3 Proposed Containment Engineering 2-1 2.4 Use of Cooling Water as a Waste Transport Medium 2-1 2.5 Operation 2-2 2.6 Future Scenario 2-2 3 Overview of Conceptual Site Model 3-1 3.1 Introduction 3-1 3.2 Pollution Source Term 3-1 3.3 Pollution Pathway – Landfill Liner 3-2 3.4 Receptors 3-3 3.5 Numerical Modelling 3-4 3.6 Conclusion 3-5 4 Source Term Characterisation 4-1 4.1 Waste Types 4-1 4.2 Overview of Physio-Chemical Properties of PFA 4-1 4.3 Site-Specific PFA Analyses 4-5 4.4 Ash Supernatant Analyses 4-10 4.5 Model Source Term 4-12 5 Environmental Setting 5-1 5.1 Topography and Surrounding Land Uses 5-1 5.2 Historical Land Uses 5-1 5.3 Regional Geology 5-3 5.4 Ground Conditions in the Site Area 5-3 5.5 Hydrology 5-6 5.6 Hydrogeology 5-8 6 Assessment of Hydrochemical Conditions 6-1 6.1 Introduction 6-1 6.2 Monitoring 6-1 7 Hydrogeological Risk Assessment & Numerical Modelling 7-1 7.1 Introduction 7-1 7.2 Source-Pathway-Receptor Linkages 7-1 7.3 Source Characterisation 7-1 7.4 Groundwater and Surface Water Monitoring 7-2 7.5 Numerical Modelling 7-3 7.6 Modelling Scenarios and Assumptions 7-4 7.7 Model Results 7-6 7.8 Model Sensitivity 7-7 7.9 Model Summary 7-8 7.10 Hydrogeological Risk Assessment Summary 7-8 8 Requisite Surveillance 8-1 8.1 Introduction 8-1 8.2 Source Term and Leachate 8-1 8.3 Groundwater 8-2 8.4 Surface Water 8-3 8.5 Proposed Control & Trigger Levels 8-3 9 Conclusions 9-1 Appendix A - HRA Drawings Appendix B - Background Leachable Testing and Site Specific Certificates of Analysis Appendix C - Historical Plans Appendix D - Borehole Logs Appendix E - Pumping Tests Appendix F - Groundwater Level Data and Hydrographs Appendix G - Baseline Groundwater Quality Appendix H - Quantitative Risk Assessment Appendix I - Site Monitoring Plan 1 Introduction Rugeley Power Limited (the applicant) has submitted a full Planning Application to Staffordshire County Council (the Waste Planning Authority or ‘WPA’) for the restoration through landfill of the B Station Borrow Pit (the Borrow Pit). The Borrow Pit is located at the eastern end of the Rugeley Power Station site in Rugeley, Staffordshire, and would be infilled using Pulverised Fuel Ash (PFA) generated on-site as a by-product of coal combustion. It is estimated that the voidspace of the Borrow Pit is around 718,000 m3 which would cater for the disposal of approximately 1 Million tonnes PFA (assuming a density of 1.4 tonnes/m3). The proposed landscaping would consume an additional 600,000 tonnes PFA (assuming a density of 1.6 tonnes/m3), increasing the landfill’s total capacity to around 1.6 Million tonnes PFA. The proposal should be able to cater for the disposal of all of Rugeley’s unsold PFA until at least 2016. PFA is classified under the European Waste Catalogue (No. 10-01-02) as being “Solid, Non-Hazardous, Stable, Non-Biodegradable and Non-Reactive”. The proposal falls under Item 11, Schedule 2 of the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) (England and Wales) Regulations 1999 (the EIA Regulations) and as such the Planning Application must be accompanied by an Environmental Statement (ES) to assess its potential environmental effects. The ES consists of three separate volumes, as follows: • Volume 1 Non Technical Summary; • Volume 2 Environmental Statement (Main Report); and • Volume 3 Hydrogeological Risk Assessment. The scope and content of the ES were agreed during pre-application meetings held with the WPA, which provided a ‘Scoping Opinion’ dated 5/12/2006 for the development under Regulation 10 of the EIA Regulations. This document is Volume 3, the Hydrogeological Risk Assessment, which provides an assessment of the likely risks posed by the landfill on groundwater and surface water quality. The Borrow Pit was excavated within fluvio-glacial sands and gravels and is approximately 11m deep. The Borrow Pit is currently flooded but would be dewatered and provided with an engineered basal and side slope liner composed of bentonite enriched soil (BES) of minimum 0.5m thickness. Due to the low level of environmental risk posed by the installation, it would be operated as a passive landfill. This report demonstrates that the installation would comply fully with the Groundwater Regulations 1998 and the Landfill Regulations 2002. The report has been prepared in general accordance with all relevant guidance provided by the Environment Agency for the landfill sector, including: • Hydrogeological Risk Assessments for Landfills and the Derivation of Groundwater Control and Trigger Levels, March 2003 • Guidance on landfill completion, February 2003 Rugeley Power Limited 1-1 Proposal to Restore Rugeley ‘B’ Station Borrow Pit through Landfill using Pulverised Fuel Ash Environmental Statement – Volume 3 ‘Hydrogeological Risk Assessment’ • Guidance on Monitoring of Landfill Leachate, Groundwater and Surface Water Issue 1 dated 28 Feb 2003 • Landfill Directive Regulatory Guidance Note 6.0 Interpretation of the Engineering Requirements of Schedule 2 of the Landfill Regulations 2002 Version 2 dated July 2004 • LFD Regulatory Guidance Note 11: The disposal in landfills for non- hazardous waste of; stable, non-reactive wastes, asbestos wastes; waste with high sulphate or gypsum contents The structure of this report is as follows: Section 2 provides a description of the installation; Section 3 summarises the conceptual site model; Section 4 characterises the source term represented by the repository; Section 5 describes the site environmental setting and the hydrogeological and hydrological conditions relating to the site and local surrounding area; Section 6 assesses the hydrochemical conditions relating both to groundwater and surface water resources located on site and in the local vicinity; Section 7 comprises the hydrogeological risk assessment, with the methodology and results of contaminant fate and transport modelling that has been carried out for the installation; Section 8 outlines the proposals for requisite monitoring of the installation in order to comply with the Groundwater Regulations and relevant guidance; Section 9 sets out the overall conclusions of the report. All drawings referred to in the report can be found in Appendix A. Rugeley Power Limited 1-2 Proposal to Restore Rugeley ‘B’ Station Borrow Pit through Landfill using Pulverised Fuel Ash Environmental Statement – Volume 3 ‘Hydrogeological Risk Assessment’ 2 Installation Description 2.1 Site Location The proposal site is located to the south-east of Rugeley Power Station (NGR 406930 316670) and covers approximately 87.3 hectares in total, of which approximately 6.3 hectares is occupied by the existing Borrow Pit. The installation will comprise a single discrete excavated cell. Drawing J24151C0/EIA/01 shows the site location and Drawing J24151C0/EIA/02-A the installation boundaries.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Walsall Tour Notes 1993
    Walsall Tour Notes 1993 The West Midlands Group organised a walk that followed the Wyrley & Essington Canal from Walsall to Sneyd and used the newly re-opened passenger route from Bloxwich North to visit Churchbridge Railway interchange basin and the now demolished South Staffordshire Railway House near there, These notes reflect a time prior to the railway privatisation, when Regional Railways had charge of local services and Intercity operated the express trains in this region. Members from the East Midlands, West Midlands and North West groups attended. Lunch was arranged at the public house built beside the infilled locks at Sneyd. Tour leader ; Ray Shill. Index 2 – 18 Morning Walk 19 – 30 Afternoon Walk 31 – 34 Images of Walk Area 1 2 3 The walk begins at Walsall Station and the group assembles in the Saddler Centre. It is a modern brick and concrete structure, a product of 1970's architecture. Many will probably remember the old station, its wooden circular booking hall and frontage to Park Street. Some may even recall the transition, in 1978, when the old booking office was demolished to leave a gaping hole above the tracks below. In this period the station entrance was effected from Station Street across a temporary footbridge to an equally temporary booking office on the island platform. Then there was only one passenger service. Electric units, usually 304s, trundled from New Street to Walsall and back. Their diagram's might have involved exotic places such as Bletchley or Manchester, but for Walsall folk the train only went to Birmingham. If they wanted anywhere else it was simply change at Brummagen.
    [Show full text]
  • Wales Network Specification: March 2017 Network Rail – Network Specification: Wales 02 Wales
    Delivering a better railway for a better Britain Network Specification 2017 Wales Network Specification: March 2017 Network Rail – Network Specification: Wales 02 Wales Incorporating Strategic Routes: L: Wales and This Network Specification describes the Wales Route in its There are also a number of other supporting documents that Borders geographical context and provides a summary of the infrastructure present specific strategies including: that is available for passenger and freight operators. It identifies Scenarios and Long Distance Forecasts – published in June 2009. the key markets for passenger and freight services by Strategic • The document considers how demand for long distance rail Route Sections (SRS). The SRSs cover specific sections of the route services, both passenger and freight, might be impacted by four and are published as appendices to this document. They describe in alternative future scenarios greater detail the current and future requirements of each SRS to inform both internal and external stakeholders of our future • Electrification Strategy – published October 2009 presents a strategy. strategy for further electrification of the network. Work is ongoing to refresh the Strategy in the light of committed Control This Network Specification draws upon the supporting evidence Period 5 electrification schemes, the ‘Electric Spine’ development from the Route Utilisation Strategy (RUS) process which informs the project and the formation of a ‘Task Force’ to consider further strategy to 2019, and the emerging findings from the Long Term electrification opportunities across the North of England. Planning Process (LTPP) which looks ahead 10 and 30 years. Stations – published in August 2011. This strategy considered the As part of the LTPP, four Market Studies have been established, • pedestrian capacity of stations on the network.
    [Show full text]
  • Report-Former Rugeley 'B' Power Station Site
    ITEM NO. 14 .1 Report of: Head of Economic Development Contact Officer: Glenn Watson Telephone No: 01543 464529 Portfolio Lead er: Economic Development and Planning Key Decision: No Report Track: Cabinet: 15/06/17 CABINET 15 JUNE 2017 FORMER RUGELEY “B” POWER STATION SITE: PROPOSED SUPPLEMENTARY PLANNING DOCUMENT (SPD) 1 Purpose of Report 1.1 To approve the production of a Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) to guide future redevelopment of the former Rugeley “B” Power Station site. 2 Recommendations 2.1 That approval is given to the preparation of a Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) to guide future redevelopment of the former Rugeley “B” Power Station site, jointly with Lichfield District Council. 2.2 That Annex 1 of this report should be utilised for the purposes of consultation to be undertaken jointly with Lichfield District Council. 2.3 That delegated authority be given to the Head of Economic Development to make non-substantive changes to the documentation prior to the formal consultation stage to incorporate further information relating to the former Rugeley “B” Power Station site. 2.4 That the Head of Economic Development, in consultation with the Cabinet Leader for Planning and Economic Development, be authorised to agree the details of the joint consultation with Lichfield District Council. 3 Key Issues and Reasons for Recommendations 3.1 Rugeley “B” Power Station stopped generating electricity in June 2016 and is currently being decommissioned by its owners, Engie. The site extends to a total of 139 ha of which 84 ha lies within Lichfield District and 55 ha in Cannock Chase District.
    [Show full text]
  • Welsh Route Study March 2016 Contents March 2016 Network Rail – Welsh Route Study 02
    Long Term Planning Process Welsh Route Study March 2016 Contents March 2016 Network Rail – Welsh Route Study 02 Foreword 03 Executive summary 04 Chapter 1 – Strategic Planning Process 06 Chapter 2 – The starting point for the Welsh Route Study 10 Chapter 3 - Consultation responses 17 Chapter 4 – Future demand for rail services - capacity and connectivity 22 Chapter 5 – Conditional Outputs - future capacity and connectivity 29 Chapter 6 – Choices for funders to 2024 49 Chapter 7 – Longer term strategy to 2043 69 Appendix A – Appraisal Results 109 Appendix B – Mapping of choices for funders to Conditional Outputs 124 Appendix C – Stakeholder aspirations 127 Appendix D – Rolling Stock characteristics 140 Appendix E – Interoperability requirements 141 Glossary 145 Foreword March 2016 Network Rail – Welsh Route Study 03 We are delighted to present this Route Study which sets out the The opportunity for the Digital Railway to address capacity strategic vision for the railway in Wales between 2019 and 2043. constraints and to improve customer experience is central to the planning approach we have adopted. It is an evidence based study that considers demand entirely within the Wales Route and also between Wales and other parts of Great This Route Study has been developed collaboratively with the Britain. railway industry, with funders and with stakeholders. We would like to thank all those involved in the exercise, which has been extensive, The railway in Wales has seen a decade of unprecedented growth, and which reflects the high level of interest in the railway in Wales. with almost 50 per cent more passenger journeys made to, from We are also grateful to the people and the organisations who took and within Wales since 2006, and our forecasts suggest that the time to respond to the Draft for Consultation published in passenger growth levels will continue to be strong during the next March 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Rugeley Power Station Development Brief
    1 Rugeley Power Station Development Brief Supplementary Planning Document Cannock Chase District Council & Lichfield District Council Adopted 20 February 2018 July 2017 Rugeley Power Station Development Brief - Supplementary Planning Document Contents 1 Introduction 3 2 Site Analysis 6 3 Policy Context 26 4 Development Principles 32 5 Delivery & Implementation 41 Appendices A LDC Planning Policy 42 B CCDC Planning Policy 46 July 2017 Rugeley Power Station Development Brief - Supplementary Planning Document 3 1 Introduction 1.5 The overall aim for the site is to create a well-designed mixed use development Background which incorporates market housing, affordable housing, self-build housing, 1.1 The Rugeley Power Stations were a employment provision, education provision series of two coal fired power stations and open space and recreational facilities. located to the east of Rugeley adjacent to It is envisaged that the new development the River Trent traversing the boundary will become a popular residential between Cannock Chase District and neighbourhood and place of work, creating a network of pedestrian and cycle routes Introduction Lichfield District. Rugeley Power Station A and open spaces which connect the site with was decommissioned during 1994 and 1 demolished in 1996 with residential the surrounding area and respond to the development still ongoing to replace the local context. facility. Purpose and Scope 1.2 This Development Brief relates primarily to Rugeley Power Station B 1.6 A Supplementary Planning Document although it does encompass part of the (SPD) is a planning policy document that former Power Station A in Lichfield District supports a policy in an adopted Local Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • West Midlands Regional Energy Strategy Monitoring Report
    West Midlands Regional Energy Strategy Monitoring Report 2006 Document Information Title: West Midlands Regional Energy Strategy Monitoring Report Creator: Brian MacAulay, [email protected] Publisher: Brian MacAulay, [email protected] Contributor: Chris Owen, [email protected] Tim.Gebbels, [email protected] Date created: 2006-04-28 Status: Version 2.0 Document Contact: Brian MacAulay, [email protected] (A full set of Document Information is available at the back of this document). 1 OVERVIEW..................................................................................................................................4 1.1 CONTEXT ...............................................................................................................................5 1.2 SUMMARY OF ENERGY STRATEGY .........................................................................................7 1.3 SUMMARY OF KEY POINTS ......................................................................................................9 1.3.1 Industry.............................................................................................................................9 1.3.2 Commerce and public services .........................................................................................9 1.3.3 Domestic .........................................................................................................................10 1.3.4 Transport ........................................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • National Rivers Authority Severn Trent Region TRENT LICENSING POLICY REVIEW DRAFT FINAL REPORT
    National Rivers Authority Severn Trent Region TRENT LICENSING POLICY REVIEW DRAFT FINAL REPORT 'O-'ZrR'l. o VERSION PURPOSE PREPARED BY /CHECKED BY REVIEWED BY K1051/060/0/Q19 ENVIRONMENT AGENCY 089502 TRENT LICENSING POLICY REVIEW DRAFT FINAL REPORT CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2. INTRODUCTION 3. SCOPE OF THE STUDY 4. DESCRIPTION OF THE CATCHMENT 5. USES OF THE RIVER TRENT 5.1 Water Abstraction 5.1.1 The Power Generation Industry 5.1.2 Public Water Supply 5.1.3 Industry 5.1.4 Agriculture 5.2 Fisheries 5.3 Recreation and Conservation 5.4 Navigation 5.5 Effluent Disposal 5.6 Flood Defence 5.7 Other Uses 6. EXISTING STATE OF THE CATCHMENT 6.1 River Flows 6.2 Water Quality 6.3 Conclusions 7. PROPOSALS FOR WATER ABSTRACTION 8 . POSSIBLE EFFECTS OF THE PROPOSALS 9. OPTIONS FOR LICENSING POLICY 9.1 Key Points 9.2 Licensing Strategy 9.3 Prescribed Flow Conditions 9.4 Other Considerations 9.5 Conclusions APPENDICES A. MINUTES OF MEETINGS B. ACTUAL ABSTRACTION FIGURES C. POTENTIAL CHANGES IN IRRIGATION DEMAND WITHIN THE RIVER TRENT CATCHMENT 1ST OF FIGURES igure 4.1 The Trent Catchment igure 5.1 Power Stations and in the Trent Basin igure 5.2 Mean Monthly Abstraction and Evaporation - Rugeley igure 5.3 - Mean-Monthly Abstraction and Evaporation — Drakelow igure 5.4 Mean Monthly Abstraction and Evaporation - Millington igure 5.5 Mean Monthly Abstraction and Evaporation - Castle Donnington igure 5.6 Mean Monthly Abstraction and Evaporation - Ratcliffe- on-Soar igure 5.7 Mean Monthly Abstraction and Evaporation - Staythorpe igure 5.8 Mean Monthly
    [Show full text]
  • Future of Coal-Fired Power Station Sites 3
    DEBATE PACK Number CDP 2016/0091, 27 April 2016 Future of coal-fired By David Hough Ed White power station sites Contents Summary 1. Summary 2 2. News items 4 This Debate pack has been compiled ahead of the debate on Future of coal-fired 3. Press releases 6 power station sites to be held on Wednesday 27 April 2016 at 2:30pm in Westminster Hall. The Member in charge of the debate is Amanda Milling MP. 4. Parliamentary Material 13 This pack contains relevant news items, press releases and parliamentary material, and 4.1 PQs 13 links to further reading. 4.2 Other Parliamentary material 20 5. Further Reading and Useful link 22 The House of Commons Library prepares a briefing in hard copy and/or online for most non-legislative debates in the Chamber and Westminster Hall other than half-hour debates. Debate Packs are produced quickly after the announcement of parliamentary business. They are intended to provide a summary or overview of the issue being debated and identify relevant briefings and useful documents, including press and parliamentary material. More detailed briefing can be prepared for Members on request to the Library. www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary 2 Number CDP 2016/0091, 27 April 2016 1. Summary This debate is concerned with the redevelopment and re-use of coal fired power stations sites in the UK. Unless carbon capture and storage becomes economical and can work at scale, electricity will no longer be generated in coal fired power stations in the UK.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of the Toxicity and Environmental Behaviour
    w w w.environment-agency.gov.uk A Review of the Toxicity and Environmental Behaviour of Hydrogen Fluoride in Air The Environment Agency is the leading public body protecting and improving the environment in England and Wales. It’s our job to make sure that air, land and water are looked after by everyone in today’s society, so that tomorrow’s generations inherit a cleaner, healthier world. Our work includes tackling flooding and pollution incidents, reducing industry’s impacts on the environment, cleaning up rivers, coastal waters and contaminated land, and improving wildlife habitats. This report is the result of research commissioned and funded by the Environment Agency’s Science Programme. Published by: Author(s): Environment Agency, Rio House, Waterside Drive, Aztec West, P Coleman, R Mascarenhas and P Rumsby Almondsbury, Bristol, BS32 4UD Tel: 01454 624400 Fax: 01454 624409 Dissemination Status: www.environment-agency.gov.uk Publicly available ISBN: 1844323579 Keywords: hydrogen fluoride, inhalation toxicity, air quality, exposure © Environment Agency January 2005 Research Contractor: All rights reserved. This document may be reproduced with prior Netcen, Culham Science Centre, Culham, Abingdon, permission of the Environment Agency. Oxfordshire, OX14 3ED WRc-NSF Ltd, Henley Road, Medmenham, Marlow, Bucks, The views expressed in this document are not necessarily SL7 2HD those of the Environment Agency. Tel: 0870 190 6437 Fax: 0870 190 6608 Website: www.netcen.co.uk. This report is printed on Cyclus Print, a 100% recycled stock, which is 100% post consumer waste and is totally chlorine free. Environment Agency’s Project Manager: Water used is treated and in most cases returned to source in Dr Melanie Gross-Sorokin from January 2003 to May 2004 and better condition than removed.
    [Show full text]
  • House of Lords
    Vol. 763 Wednesday No. 42 16 September 2015 PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) HOUSE OF LORDS WRITTEN STATEMENTS AND WRITTEN ANSWERS Written Statements ................................ ................. 1 Written Answers ................................ ..................... 7 [I] indicates that the member concerned has a relevant registered interest. The full register of interests can be found at http://www.parliament.uk/mps-lords-and-offices/standards-and-interests/register-of-lords-interests/ Members who want a printed copy of Written Answers and Written Statements should notify the Printed Paper Office. This printed edition is a reproduction of the original text of Answers and Statements, which can be found on the internet at http://www.parliament.uk/writtenanswers/. Proposed corrections should be sent to [email protected] for review. Ministers and others who make Statements or answer Questions are referred to only by name, not their ministerial or other title. The current list of ministerial and other responsibilities is as follows. Minister Responsibilities Baroness Stowell of Beeston Leader of the House of Lords and Lord Privy Seal Earl Howe Minister of State, Ministry of Defence and Deputy Leader of the House of Lords Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Home Office and Department for Transport Baroness Anelay of St Johns Minister of State, Foreign and Commonwealth Office Baroness Altmann Minister of State, Department for Work and Pensions Lord Ashton of Hyde Whip Lord Bates Minister of State, Home
    [Show full text]
  • Rugeley B Power Station, Rugeley January 2019
    Rugeley B Power Station, Rugeley January 2019 Rugeley B Power Station, Rugeley Environmental Impact Assessment Scoping Report Volume 1 – Main Statement On behalf of Rugeley Power Limited Contents CHAPTER 1: ................................................................................... INTRODUCTION CHAPTER 2: ............................................................................. SITE DESCRIPTION CHAPTER 3: .............................................................. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT CHAPTER 4: ................................................................................... EIA APPROACH CHAPTER 5: .............................. ALTERNATIVE OPTIONS AND CONSULTATION CHAPTER 6: ........................................................................... SOCIO-ECONOMICS CHAPTER 7: ....................................................................................... AIR QUALITY CHAPTER 8: .................................................................................. ARCHAEOLOGY CHAPTER 9: ................................................................................ BUILT HERITAGE CHAPTER 10: .......................................................................................... ECOLOGY CHAPTER 11: ..................... WATER ENVIRONMENT (INCLUDING FLOOD RISK) CHAPTER 12: .................................................................... NOISE AND VIBRATION CHAPTER 13: ..................................................................... GROUND CONDITIONS CHAPTER 14: .....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Control Committee Agenda
    Please ask for: Mrs. J. Hunt Extension No: 4623 E-Mail: [email protected] 14 July, 2020 Dear Councillor, PLANNING CONTROL COMMITTEE 3:00 PM, WEDNESDAY 22 JULY, 2020 MEETING TO BE HELD REMOTELY You are invited to attend this remote meeting for consideration of the matters itemised in the following Agenda. The meeting will commence at 3.00pm via Zoom. Instructions on how to access the meeting will follow. Instructions on how the public can access the meeting will be posted on the Council’s website. Yours sincerely, T. McGovern Managing Director To Councillors:- Cartwright, Mrs. S.M. (Chairman) Startin, P. (Vice-Chairman) Allen, F.W.C. Pearson, A.R. Dudson, A. Smith, C.D. Fisher, P.A Stretton, Mrs. P.Z. Fitzgerald, Mrs. A.A. Thompson, Mrs. S. Jones, Mrs. V. Todd, Mrs. D. Layton, A. Witton, P. Muckley, A. Civic Centre, PO Box 28, Beecroft Road, Cannock, Staffordshire WS11 1BG tel 01543 462621 | fax 01543 462317 | www.cannockchasedc.gov.uk Search for ‘Cannock Chase Life’ @CannockChaseDC A G E N D A PART 1 1. Apologies 2. Declarations of Interests of Members in Contracts and Other Matters and Restriction on Voting by Members To declare any personal, pecuniary or disclosable pecuniary interests in accordance with the Code of Conduct and any possible contraventions under Section 106 of the Local Government Finance Act 1992. 3. Disclosure of details of lobbying of Members 4. Minutes To approve the minutes of the meetings held on 1 and 8 July, 2020 (enclosed). 5. Members’ Requests for Site Visits 6. Report of the Development Control Manager Members wishing to obtain information on applications for planning approval prior to the commencement of the meeting are asked to contact the Development Control Manager.
    [Show full text]