DOCSLIB.ORG

Report-Rugeley 'B' Power Station Site Planning Application

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Report-Rugeley 'B' Power Station Site Planning Application Application No: CH/19/201 ITEM NO. 6.1 Location: Rugeley B Power Station, Power Station Road, Rugeley, WS15 2HS Proposal: Outline planning application for the creation of development platform and the demolition of existing office building and environmental centre, site clearance, remediation and mixed-use development comprising: Up to 2,300 new dwellings and residential units (Use Classes C3 and C2); up to 1.2ha of mixed use (Use Classes A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, C1, C2, C3, D1 & D2) up to 5ha of employment (Use Classes B1a,b,c &,B2); 1 No. 2 Form Entry Primary School (Use Class D1); Formal and Informal Publicly Accessible Open Space; Key Infrastructure including new adoptable roads within the site and the provision of a new primary access junction on to the A513; ground mounted solar panels and 2 No. existing electricity substations (132 kV & 400 kV) retained (All matters reserved except access) PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK ITEM NO. 6.2 Contact Officer: David O’Connor Telephone No: 01543 464 515 PLANNING CONTROL COMMITTEE 15 JANUARY 2020 Application No: CH/19/201 Received: 28-May-2019 Location: Rugeley ‘B’ Power Station, Power Station Road, Rugeley, WS15 2HS Parishes: Brereton and Ravenhill Rugeley Description: Outline Planning Application with the points of access included for the creation of a development platform and the demolition of existing office building and environmental centre, site clearance, remediation and mixed-use development of land at the former Rugeley Power Station comprising: up to 2,300 new dwellings and residential units (Use Classes C3 and C2), up to 1.2 ha of mixed-use (Use Class A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, C1, C2, C3, D1 & D2) up to 5ha of employment (Use Classes B1(a, b and c) and B2), 1 No. 2 form entry primary school (Use Class D1), formal and informal Publicly Accessible Open Space, key infrastructure including new adoptable roads within the site and the provision of a new primary access junction on to the A513, ground mounted solar panels with 2 No. existing electricity substations (132 kV & 400 kV) retained Application Type: Full Planning Application Major with ES RECOMMENDATION: Approve subject to the conditions within this report and: (1) Subject to the owners/applicants first entering into a Section 106 Legal Agreement under the Town and Country Planning Act (as amended) to secure contributions/planning obligations towards:- 1. On-site affordable housing provision equivalent to 17.6% spread evenly across the site (approx. 405 dwellings total) 2. On-site Sports Provision (including changing facilities and management). 3. On-site Public Open Space Provision (including delivery of Riverside Park, retained and new allotments and public art) ITEM NO. 6.3 4. Delivery of 2 form of entry primary school on site or £7.9 Million contribution and secondary school contribution of £8 Million 5. Highways and Transport Contributions (Off-site Highway Works costed to approximately £4.6 Million), off site linkage improvements, Trent Valley Station Improvements and canal towpath improvements 6. Public Transport Contribution (approx. £3.345 Million) or equivalent similar provision of public transport 7. Travel Plan Monitoring Sum £50,000 8. Air Quality Mitigation Contribution towards Cannock Chase SAC (£2.387 Million) 9. Provision of on-site Community Building and Healthcare Contribution (between £430-736K) Note a separate Unilateral Undertaking relating to the payment of £221 per dwelling for the mitigation of visitor pressure on the Cannock Chase SAC is also required. (2) If the S106 legal agreement / Unilateral Undertaking are not signed/completed by the 13th April 2020 or the expiration of any further agreed extension of time, then powers be delegated to officers to refuse planning permission based on the unacceptability of the development, without the required contributions and undertakings, as outlined. (3) And delegated approval to Officers to make minor changes to conditions as may be required Executive Summary Figure 1: Rugeley Power Station Design and Access Statement Extract (Pg 8) 1.1 The revised application seeks outline planning permission with the points of access included for the development of up to 2,300 dwellings, 1.2 ha of mixed- uses and up to 5ha of employment land. The proposal is cross boundary, affecting land within both Lichfield and Cannock Chase Districts. The submissions include a high level illustrative master plan showing how the ITEM NO. 6.4 resultant site could appear. Matters relating to appearance, the precise layout of the site, landscaping and the scale/ height of the buildings are reserved for subsequent approval and as such do not fall for full determination at this time. However the applicant has provided details for approval in the form of Parameters Plans which convey the broad site layout, density, intended movement framework and building heights amongst others features. Environmental Statement 1.2 By virtue of the size and scale of the proposed development and the potential for significant effects during the construction and operational phases of the development, an Environmental Statement has been submitted with the application. The Environmental Statement (ES) describes and assesses the likely environmental impacts of the proposed development and proposes various mitigation measures to avoid, remedy or reduce impacts where appropriate. 1.3 In terms of the Environmental Impact Assessment, it is considered that the implementation of the mitigation measures referenced within the ES will prevent the proposed development from having any significant adverse environmental effects. However this is not the same as concluding the development would not have any impacts on the local area from a planning perspective. These are explored and explained later in this report. 1.4 Therefore, a key issue in the determination of this application is whether the proposed development is acceptable, or can be made acceptable in planning terms with due regard to the relevant local and national planning policies and all other relevant planning considerations, including the proposed planning conditions and Section 106 obligations. Principle of Development 1.5 The application site straddles the boundary between Cannock Chase District Council and Lichfield District Council. The site as a whole is not identified or allocated for any purpose within the current adopted Local Plan (Part 1) in Cannock Chase District. The closure and redevelopment of the Power Station site was not envisaged in the processes that lead to the production of the Local Plan (Part 1) prior to 2014. Although the Council is working to progress a Local Plan Review, this work is in its early stages and cannot be given substantial weight in determining the current application. The site is also subject to the Rugeley Power Station Development Brief SPD that was jointly produced between the respective Council’s and this provides guidance about the wider redevelopment of the site. 1.6 The site is allocated for residential development of a minimum of 800 dwellings within the development plan governing the land within Lichfield District Council’s administrative area. The Armitage with Handsacre Neighbourhood Plan applies to the area of land around the Borrow Pit Lake, suggesting this should be Protected Open Space. A small development parcel is proposed within the application to the north of the Borrow Pit Lake. This portion of the development runs in conflict with Policy AH4 in the Armitage with Handsacre Neighbourhood Plan, although the general thrust and purpose of AH4 reflects the ambitions of the Rugeley Power Station SPD to retain the Borrow Pit as a landscape/water ITEM NO. 6.5 feature and promote improved access and recreational use of such assets, which the proposed development achieves. 1.7 Spatially the site is located on the edge of Rugeley town and is in part previously developed land (aka Brownfield). The development proposed is considered to be sustainably located with good access to public transport and day to day facilities, which could be further improved as part of the development. Accordingly, in spatial planning policy terms the development is considered acceptable. Design Concept 1.8 The site will include a new link to Rugeley town centre via the former rail link into the site. This will provide access from the town to a new neighbourhood centre inclusive of a convenience retail store (up to 500sqm), a community building and other mixed uses, closely associated with the proposed primary school, employment uses, formal sports provision and the proposed 25Ha Riverside Park. Also proposed is a smaller neighbourhood centre close to the Borrow Pit Lake with a more recreation related focus as well as links interconnecting with neighbouring land. Additional sports facilities are to be provided around the location of the former Power Station Social Club. The features will be linked by extensive walkable routes including the ‘Riverside Walk’ spanning much of the length of the site. The density and scale of development would be up to 4 and 5 storeys in the more accessible western portion of the site and would be largely up to 2.5 to 3 storeys to the eastern portion. Transport 1.9 Detailed transport modelling has been carried out to predict the uplift of traffic associated with the site. The predicted uplifts require certain improvements to offsite junctions and the wider pedestrian, cycle and canal towpath network. These improvements would be secured by conditions and S106 as would improvements to access to Rugeley Town and Trent Valley
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Walsall Tour Notes 1993
    Walsall Tour Notes 1993 The West Midlands Group organised a walk that followed the Wyrley & Essington Canal from Walsall to Sneyd and used the newly re-opened passenger route from Bloxwich North to visit Churchbridge Railway interchange basin and the now demolished South Staffordshire Railway House near there, These notes reflect a time prior to the railway privatisation, when Regional Railways had charge of local services and Intercity operated the express trains in this region. Members from the East Midlands, West Midlands and North West groups attended. Lunch was arranged at the public house built beside the infilled locks at Sneyd. Tour leader ; Ray Shill. Index 2 – 18 Morning Walk 19 – 30 Afternoon Walk 31 – 34 Images of Walk Area 1 2 3 The walk begins at Walsall Station and the group assembles in the Saddler Centre. It is a modern brick and concrete structure, a product of 1970's architecture. Many will probably remember the old station, its wooden circular booking hall and frontage to Park Street. Some may even recall the transition, in 1978, when the old booking office was demolished to leave a gaping hole above the tracks below. In this period the station entrance was effected from Station Street across a temporary footbridge to an equally temporary booking office on the island platform. Then there was only one passenger service. Electric units, usually 304s, trundled from New Street to Walsall and back. Their diagram's might have involved exotic places such as Bletchley or Manchester, but for Walsall folk the train only went to Birmingham. If they wanted anywhere else it was simply change at Brummagen.
    [Show full text]
  • Wales Network Specification: March 2017 Network Rail – Network Specification: Wales 02 Wales
    Delivering a better railway for a better Britain Network Specification 2017 Wales Network Specification: March 2017 Network Rail – Network Specification: Wales 02 Wales Incorporating Strategic Routes: L: Wales and This Network Specification describes the Wales Route in its There are also a number of other supporting documents that Borders geographical context and provides a summary of the infrastructure present specific strategies including: that is available for passenger and freight operators. It identifies Scenarios and Long Distance Forecasts – published in June 2009. the key markets for passenger and freight services by Strategic • The document considers how demand for long distance rail Route Sections (SRS). The SRSs cover specific sections of the route services, both passenger and freight, might be impacted by four and are published as appendices to this document. They describe in alternative future scenarios greater detail the current and future requirements of each SRS to inform both internal and external stakeholders of our future • Electrification Strategy – published October 2009 presents a strategy. strategy for further electrification of the network. Work is ongoing to refresh the Strategy in the light of committed Control This Network Specification draws upon the supporting evidence Period 5 electrification schemes, the ‘Electric Spine’ development from the Route Utilisation Strategy (RUS) process which informs the project and the formation of a ‘Task Force’ to consider further strategy to 2019, and the emerging findings from the Long Term electrification opportunities across the North of England. Planning Process (LTPP) which looks ahead 10 and 30 years. Stations – published in August 2011. This strategy considered the As part of the LTPP, four Market Studies have been established, • pedestrian capacity of stations on the network.
    [Show full text]
  • Report-Former Rugeley 'B' Power Station Site
    ITEM NO. 14 .1 Report of: Head of Economic Development Contact Officer: Glenn Watson Telephone No: 01543 464529 Portfolio Lead er: Economic Development and Planning Key Decision: No Report Track: Cabinet: 15/06/17 CABINET 15 JUNE 2017 FORMER RUGELEY “B” POWER STATION SITE: PROPOSED SUPPLEMENTARY PLANNING DOCUMENT (SPD) 1 Purpose of Report 1.1 To approve the production of a Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) to guide future redevelopment of the former Rugeley “B” Power Station site. 2 Recommendations 2.1 That approval is given to the preparation of a Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) to guide future redevelopment of the former Rugeley “B” Power Station site, jointly with Lichfield District Council. 2.2 That Annex 1 of this report should be utilised for the purposes of consultation to be undertaken jointly with Lichfield District Council. 2.3 That delegated authority be given to the Head of Economic Development to make non-substantive changes to the documentation prior to the formal consultation stage to incorporate further information relating to the former Rugeley “B” Power Station site. 2.4 That the Head of Economic Development, in consultation with the Cabinet Leader for Planning and Economic Development, be authorised to agree the details of the joint consultation with Lichfield District Council. 3 Key Issues and Reasons for Recommendations 3.1 Rugeley “B” Power Station stopped generating electricity in June 2016 and is currently being decommissioned by its owners, Engie. The site extends to a total of 139 ha of which 84 ha lies within Lichfield District and 55 ha in Cannock Chase District.
    [Show full text]
  • Welsh Route Study March 2016 Contents March 2016 Network Rail – Welsh Route Study 02
    Long Term Planning Process Welsh Route Study March 2016 Contents March 2016 Network Rail – Welsh Route Study 02 Foreword 03 Executive summary 04 Chapter 1 – Strategic Planning Process 06 Chapter 2 – The starting point for the Welsh Route Study 10 Chapter 3 - Consultation responses 17 Chapter 4 – Future demand for rail services - capacity and connectivity 22 Chapter 5 – Conditional Outputs - future capacity and connectivity 29 Chapter 6 – Choices for funders to 2024 49 Chapter 7 – Longer term strategy to 2043 69 Appendix A – Appraisal Results 109 Appendix B – Mapping of choices for funders to Conditional Outputs 124 Appendix C – Stakeholder aspirations 127 Appendix D – Rolling Stock characteristics 140 Appendix E – Interoperability requirements 141 Glossary 145 Foreword March 2016 Network Rail – Welsh Route Study 03 We are delighted to present this Route Study which sets out the The opportunity for the Digital Railway to address capacity strategic vision for the railway in Wales between 2019 and 2043. constraints and to improve customer experience is central to the planning approach we have adopted. It is an evidence based study that considers demand entirely within the Wales Route and also between Wales and other parts of Great This Route Study has been developed collaboratively with the Britain. railway industry, with funders and with stakeholders. We would like to thank all those involved in the exercise, which has been extensive, The railway in Wales has seen a decade of unprecedented growth, and which reflects the high level of interest in the railway in Wales. with almost 50 per cent more passenger journeys made to, from We are also grateful to the people and the organisations who took and within Wales since 2006, and our forecasts suggest that the time to respond to the Draft for Consultation published in passenger growth levels will continue to be strong during the next March 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Rugeley Power Station Development Brief
    1 Rugeley Power Station Development Brief Supplementary Planning Document Cannock Chase District Council & Lichfield District Council Adopted 20 February 2018 July 2017 Rugeley Power Station Development Brief - Supplementary Planning Document Contents 1 Introduction 3 2 Site Analysis 6 3 Policy Context 26 4 Development Principles 32 5 Delivery & Implementation 41 Appendices A LDC Planning Policy 42 B CCDC Planning Policy 46 July 2017 Rugeley Power Station Development Brief - Supplementary Planning Document 3 1 Introduction 1.5 The overall aim for the site is to create a well-designed mixed use development Background which incorporates market housing, affordable housing, self-build housing, 1.1 The Rugeley Power Stations were a employment provision, education provision series of two coal fired power stations and open space and recreational facilities. located to the east of Rugeley adjacent to It is envisaged that the new development the River Trent traversing the boundary will become a popular residential between Cannock Chase District and neighbourhood and place of work, creating a network of pedestrian and cycle routes Introduction Lichfield District. Rugeley Power Station A and open spaces which connect the site with was decommissioned during 1994 and 1 demolished in 1996 with residential the surrounding area and respond to the development still ongoing to replace the local context. facility. Purpose and Scope 1.2 This Development Brief relates primarily to Rugeley Power Station B 1.6 A Supplementary Planning Document although it does encompass part of the (SPD) is a planning policy document that former Power Station A in Lichfield District supports a policy in an adopted Local Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • West Midlands Regional Energy Strategy Monitoring Report
    West Midlands Regional Energy Strategy Monitoring Report 2006 Document Information Title: West Midlands Regional Energy Strategy Monitoring Report Creator: Brian MacAulay, [email protected] Publisher: Brian MacAulay, [email protected] Contributor: Chris Owen, [email protected] Tim.Gebbels, [email protected] Date created: 2006-04-28 Status: Version 2.0 Document Contact: Brian MacAulay, [email protected] (A full set of Document Information is available at the back of this document). 1 OVERVIEW..................................................................................................................................4 1.1 CONTEXT ...............................................................................................................................5 1.2 SUMMARY OF ENERGY STRATEGY .........................................................................................7 1.3 SUMMARY OF KEY POINTS ......................................................................................................9 1.3.1 Industry.............................................................................................................................9 1.3.2 Commerce and public services .........................................................................................9 1.3.3 Domestic .........................................................................................................................10 1.3.4 Transport ........................................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • National Rivers Authority Severn Trent Region TRENT LICENSING POLICY REVIEW DRAFT FINAL REPORT
    National Rivers Authority Severn Trent Region TRENT LICENSING POLICY REVIEW DRAFT FINAL REPORT 'O-'ZrR'l. o VERSION PURPOSE PREPARED BY /CHECKED BY REVIEWED BY K1051/060/0/Q19 ENVIRONMENT AGENCY 089502 TRENT LICENSING POLICY REVIEW DRAFT FINAL REPORT CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2. INTRODUCTION 3. SCOPE OF THE STUDY 4. DESCRIPTION OF THE CATCHMENT 5. USES OF THE RIVER TRENT 5.1 Water Abstraction 5.1.1 The Power Generation Industry 5.1.2 Public Water Supply 5.1.3 Industry 5.1.4 Agriculture 5.2 Fisheries 5.3 Recreation and Conservation 5.4 Navigation 5.5 Effluent Disposal 5.6 Flood Defence 5.7 Other Uses 6. EXISTING STATE OF THE CATCHMENT 6.1 River Flows 6.2 Water Quality 6.3 Conclusions 7. PROPOSALS FOR WATER ABSTRACTION 8 . POSSIBLE EFFECTS OF THE PROPOSALS 9. OPTIONS FOR LICENSING POLICY 9.1 Key Points 9.2 Licensing Strategy 9.3 Prescribed Flow Conditions 9.4 Other Considerations 9.5 Conclusions APPENDICES A. MINUTES OF MEETINGS B. ACTUAL ABSTRACTION FIGURES C. POTENTIAL CHANGES IN IRRIGATION DEMAND WITHIN THE RIVER TRENT CATCHMENT 1ST OF FIGURES igure 4.1 The Trent Catchment igure 5.1 Power Stations and in the Trent Basin igure 5.2 Mean Monthly Abstraction and Evaporation - Rugeley igure 5.3 - Mean-Monthly Abstraction and Evaporation — Drakelow igure 5.4 Mean Monthly Abstraction and Evaporation - Millington igure 5.5 Mean Monthly Abstraction and Evaporation - Castle Donnington igure 5.6 Mean Monthly Abstraction and Evaporation - Ratcliffe- on-Soar igure 5.7 Mean Monthly Abstraction and Evaporation - Staythorpe igure 5.8 Mean Monthly
    [Show full text]
  • Future of Coal-Fired Power Station Sites 3
    DEBATE PACK Number CDP 2016/0091, 27 April 2016 Future of coal-fired By David Hough Ed White power station sites Contents Summary 1. Summary 2 2. News items 4 This Debate pack has been compiled ahead of the debate on Future of coal-fired 3. Press releases 6 power station sites to be held on Wednesday 27 April 2016 at 2:30pm in Westminster Hall. The Member in charge of the debate is Amanda Milling MP. 4. Parliamentary Material 13 This pack contains relevant news items, press releases and parliamentary material, and 4.1 PQs 13 links to further reading. 4.2 Other Parliamentary material 20 5. Further Reading and Useful link 22 The House of Commons Library prepares a briefing in hard copy and/or online for most non-legislative debates in the Chamber and Westminster Hall other than half-hour debates. Debate Packs are produced quickly after the announcement of parliamentary business. They are intended to provide a summary or overview of the issue being debated and identify relevant briefings and useful documents, including press and parliamentary material. More detailed briefing can be prepared for Members on request to the Library. www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary 2 Number CDP 2016/0091, 27 April 2016 1. Summary This debate is concerned with the redevelopment and re-use of coal fired power stations sites in the UK. Unless carbon capture and storage becomes economical and can work at scale, electricity will no longer be generated in coal fired power stations in the UK.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of the Toxicity and Environmental Behaviour
    w w w.environment-agency.gov.uk A Review of the Toxicity and Environmental Behaviour of Hydrogen Fluoride in Air The Environment Agency is the leading public body protecting and improving the environment in England and Wales. It’s our job to make sure that air, land and water are looked after by everyone in today’s society, so that tomorrow’s generations inherit a cleaner, healthier world. Our work includes tackling flooding and pollution incidents, reducing industry’s impacts on the environment, cleaning up rivers, coastal waters and contaminated land, and improving wildlife habitats. This report is the result of research commissioned and funded by the Environment Agency’s Science Programme. Published by: Author(s): Environment Agency, Rio House, Waterside Drive, Aztec West, P Coleman, R Mascarenhas and P Rumsby Almondsbury, Bristol, BS32 4UD Tel: 01454 624400 Fax: 01454 624409 Dissemination Status: www.environment-agency.gov.uk Publicly available ISBN: 1844323579 Keywords: hydrogen fluoride, inhalation toxicity, air quality, exposure © Environment Agency January 2005 Research Contractor: All rights reserved. This document may be reproduced with prior Netcen, Culham Science Centre, Culham, Abingdon, permission of the Environment Agency. Oxfordshire, OX14 3ED WRc-NSF Ltd, Henley Road, Medmenham, Marlow, Bucks, The views expressed in this document are not necessarily SL7 2HD those of the Environment Agency. Tel: 0870 190 6437 Fax: 0870 190 6608 Website: www.netcen.co.uk. This report is printed on Cyclus Print, a 100% recycled stock, which is 100% post consumer waste and is totally chlorine free. Environment Agency’s Project Manager: Water used is treated and in most cases returned to source in Dr Melanie Gross-Sorokin from January 2003 to May 2004 and better condition than removed.
    [Show full text]
  • House of Lords
    Vol. 763 Wednesday No. 42 16 September 2015 PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) HOUSE OF LORDS WRITTEN STATEMENTS AND WRITTEN ANSWERS Written Statements ................................ ................. 1 Written Answers ................................ ..................... 7 [I] indicates that the member concerned has a relevant registered interest. The full register of interests can be found at http://www.parliament.uk/mps-lords-and-offices/standards-and-interests/register-of-lords-interests/ Members who want a printed copy of Written Answers and Written Statements should notify the Printed Paper Office. This printed edition is a reproduction of the original text of Answers and Statements, which can be found on the internet at http://www.parliament.uk/writtenanswers/. Proposed corrections should be sent to [email protected] for review. Ministers and others who make Statements or answer Questions are referred to only by name, not their ministerial or other title. The current list of ministerial and other responsibilities is as follows. Minister Responsibilities Baroness Stowell of Beeston Leader of the House of Lords and Lord Privy Seal Earl Howe Minister of State, Ministry of Defence and Deputy Leader of the House of Lords Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Home Office and Department for Transport Baroness Anelay of St Johns Minister of State, Foreign and Commonwealth Office Baroness Altmann Minister of State, Department for Work and Pensions Lord Ashton of Hyde Whip Lord Bates Minister of State, Home
    [Show full text]
  • Rugeley B Power Station, Rugeley January 2019
    Rugeley B Power Station, Rugeley January 2019 Rugeley B Power Station, Rugeley Environmental Impact Assessment Scoping Report Volume 1 – Main Statement On behalf of Rugeley Power Limited Contents CHAPTER 1: ................................................................................... INTRODUCTION CHAPTER 2: ............................................................................. SITE DESCRIPTION CHAPTER 3: .............................................................. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT CHAPTER 4: ................................................................................... EIA APPROACH CHAPTER 5: .............................. ALTERNATIVE OPTIONS AND CONSULTATION CHAPTER 6: ........................................................................... SOCIO-ECONOMICS CHAPTER 7: ....................................................................................... AIR QUALITY CHAPTER 8: .................................................................................. ARCHAEOLOGY CHAPTER 9: ................................................................................ BUILT HERITAGE CHAPTER 10: .......................................................................................... ECOLOGY CHAPTER 11: ..................... WATER ENVIRONMENT (INCLUDING FLOOD RISK) CHAPTER 12: .................................................................... NOISE AND VIBRATION CHAPTER 13: ..................................................................... GROUND CONDITIONS CHAPTER 14: .....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogeological Risk Assessment Proposal to Restore
    Environmental Statement Volume 3 – Hydrogeological Risk Assessment Proposal to Restore Rugeley ‘B’ Station Borrow Pit through Landfill using Pulverised Fuel Ash Rugeley Power Station May 2007 Document control sheet Form IP180/B Client: Rugeley Power Limited Project: Rugeley B Station Borrow Pit Landfill Job No: J24151C0 Title: Environmental Statement (Volume 3, Hydrogeological Risk Assessment) Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by ORIGINAL NAME NAME NAME S. Mannings & A. J. Oakeshott Parkes S. Mannings DATE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE April 2007 REVISION 1 NAME NAME NAME J. Oakeshott S. Mannings S. Mannings DATE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE May 2007 REVISION NAME NAME NAME DATE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE REVISION NAME NAME NAME DATE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE This report, and information or advice which it contains, is provided by Jacobs Ltd solely for internal use and reliance by its Client in performance of Jacobs Ltd’s duties and liabilities under its contract with the Client. Any advice, opinions, or recommendations within this report should be read and relied upon only in the context of the report as a whole. The advice and opinions in this report are based upon the information made available to Jacobs Ltd at the date of this report and on current UK standards, codes, technology and construction practices as at the date of this report. Following final delivery of this report to the Client, Jacobs Ltd will have no further obligations or duty to advise the Client on any matters, including development affecting the information or advice provided in this report. This report has been prepared by Jacobs Ltd in their professional capacity as Consulting Engineers.
    [Show full text]